Laserfiche WebLink
Hawai`i County Charter Commission -4 October 12, 2018 <br />Please understand our position is not to take away from the principal of protecting <br />special lands. We know that is very important. Outside of the lower rate --let's <br />take a simple example that the present Charter says that we cannot ever sell it. I <br />cannot ever use that two percent funds for any of the maintenance of any park or <br />any lands purchase. It presents a simple problem sometimes if the land should be <br />given or sold to the State or National Park or whatever reason, that the Charter <br />prevents any of that for even consideration. I'm asking for review of that to see <br />what is best for the public. <br />The other thing I want to touch very lightly on is in regards to the proposal of the <br />Department of Water Supply. I've always, and I mean always from way back as <br />far as I can understand government, the Department of Water Supply is our most <br />precious resource. And that resource must be protected from as much as possible <br />the control of a single factor like the Mayor. I push for and I will always support <br />it be under the people's commission. Even that is questioned by some, "Well you <br />appoint the commissioners." This is correct. But the Council—we just nominate, <br />the Council approves or disapproves. I am for a form of government that <br />disseminate the power as much as possible where it is best. The Department of <br />Water Supply belongs under the control, supervision of the people through the <br />commissions system. The Mayor's responsibility and our authority is in regards <br />to general supervision and budget review. Nothing more than that, and I think it <br />is in the best interest of public that we keep it there. <br />In regards to the last one of the appointees, I am opposed to where the appointees <br />of cabinet are to be reviewed every two years. I think all of you and I see several <br />of you have administrative experience, and you can see how much of a problem <br />that would pose to appointed people where the continuation of them would be <br />under the authority someone else besides the Mayor. Even the dismissal of it <br />would be difficult. So I ask you to please look at that. In all of it, I think, has one <br />common denominator and that is a government that is what we consider is best for <br />the people, not for the Mayor. Thank you. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Mr. Mayor, if I may ask the Commissioners if they have any <br />questions? Briefly, in the advisory commissions you have the ability to appoint <br />advisory commissions in the Charter, and in the Charter it talks about the fact that <br />the departments will generally fund from their own funds these advisory <br />commissions. There has been expressed to us some concern about those. Do you <br />have any comment about that? <br />MAYOR KIM: There's a commission that I am thinking about now in regards to <br />funding. What we do on staff is try to appoint someone to—especially of <br />secretarial staff and any other expense. Any review of that that this commission <br />feels is best for the members who execute their duties will not be fought. Funding <br />in regards to where the sources come from basically, you know, it comes from the <br />very same source. It's a matter of process of where it --what department it comes <br />Page 11 <br />