Laserfiche WebLink
against having something that will help the island’s environment, but they would like the <br />chance to be at the table to suggest where it should be. <br /> <br />Sophia Hanoa: Ms. Hanoa said she was born and raised in Pāhala, is a resident there, <br />and wanted to share some of the community’s concerns. First and foremost, there was no <br />disclosure of what was going on. The county came out in December with a plan, and the <br />community was told that different sites were being looked at, and it was up in the air. The <br />county was to return in April to talk to the community, but never did. All of a sudden, in <br />September, they got notification that an EA was done. The community had no idea. A copy <br />of the EA was dropped off at the library, but no one could check it out because it was a <br />reference item. The elderly had no idea what was going on. The community has been <br />stressed since 2007 with the sewage system. Some residents have been paying sewage <br />fees, and they are not even hooked up. They wonder why they are paying these fees. <br />Psychological stress is placed on the community now regarding the new system. They are <br />worried about the cost. They were told it was possibly going to be $20,000. Some of the <br />residents also have to pay for the cost to cover up their cesspools. The whole project is <br />being fast-tracked without the community’s input. The site in the EA was deemed not a <br />primary location back in 2008. Their former councilman, Guy Enriques, had provided a <br />handout on this. So why was an EA being done on the same site that the county knew was <br />not appropriate? The site has burials and caves. The community knows they need a <br />sewage plant. However, there is a better location just below the highway. If the county had <br />consulted Edward Andrade, who was the C. Brewer manager of the sewage system, he <br />would have told them the site below the highway is better. There is already access under <br />the highway, and the plantation used to use this access as well. Kamehameha Schools owns <br />the proposed site area, and they also own the site below the highway. The chosen location <br />is right at the entrance of Pāhala’s old historical road. Everyone knows they have flooding <br />problems. All of the community’s water comes to the corner of the proposed site. It’s a <br />hazard. Emergency access is also a problem. There are two ways in and out of Pāhala, one <br />by the hospital entrance and the other at the proposed site. If flooding occurs, they would <br />have to block off Maile Street and Māmalahoa Highway. If a flood overflows toward the <br />hospital, the community will be locked in. The lower part of Māmalahoa Highway would be <br />a better site. The community agrees, but they were never asked. She hopes the extension <br />is granted. The community wants to work with the county. They know it has to be done, <br />but it needs to be done properly. Wise decisions need to be made for the generations to <br />come. The cost is an issue. She just wanted to let the EMC know the concerns of the Pāhala <br />community and that they want to work with the county to get this project done <br />appropriately. <br /> <br />4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> <br />a. Chair’s update on the Environmental Management Commission’s report <br />to the Charter Commission. <br /> <br />Chair Bennett said he should probably apologize for his naivety. When he was asked <br />to provide the Charter Commission with the EMC’s report, he made the assumption they <br />would allow him to give a presentation to provide more detail. While the chair told him <br /> <br /> <br />