Laserfiche WebLink
1. Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of Hawaii of 1978, at 678. <br />In explaining their underlying intent, the framers distinguish between <br />officeholders whose offices were to be filled by an upcoming election and <br />those whose offices were not then subject to election: <br />Your Committee does not believe it would be warranted for a candidate to <br />resign if the office he is seeking has a concurrent term. In this case, he is <br />in effect resigning since, if he loses the election, he does not have an <br />office to return to. He is not abusing his elected office by using it as a safe <br />haven from which to make political forays and return if he proves <br />unsuccessful. <br />Id. (emphasis added in original). (page 2 of Opinion). <br />The Attorney General also addressed the issue of the various beginning and <br />ending dates of the terms for Hawai'i's federal, state and county offices. <br />Nothing in the constitutional history allows us to conclude that the framers <br />intended to distinguish between incumbent state legislators or board of education <br />members or Office of Hawai'ian affairs trustees, whose terms begin and end at a <br />general election and who would never need to resign if they were candidates <br />during the last year of their terms irrespective of the office sought, and federal <br />incumbents, the governor or the lieutenant governor, or elected county <br />incumbents who were completing the last year of their terms but seeking offices <br />with terms which begin chronologically before the term of the offices held end. <br />Moreover, the Attorney General explained that "If relying upon a literal or "plain <br />meaning" interpretation of "term" or the phrase "begins before the end" to distinguish <br />between incumbents' whose terms begin and end at a general election and those <br />whose terms do not, would lead to an unreasonable or unconstitutional result, that <br />interpretation should be avoided. We believe that such a distinction is not likely to <br />withstand the judicial scrutiny to which it would be put by a challenge based on the First <br />Amendment or the Equal Protection Clause." <br />Therefore, under Section 7, Article II of the Hawai'i State Constitution, the term of <br />office is considered broadly rather than by a particular start and end date for each office. <br />Thus, even though a Hawai'i State Senator is deemed to be elected on day of the <br />election (November 6, 2018) and a Hawai'i County Council member term begins on the <br />first Monday of December after their election (December 3, 2018), the proper <br />interpretation of Section 7, Article II is that both the Hawai'i State Senate office and <br />Council office end during the same term (2018). As such, a Hawai'i County Council <br />member is not required to resign upon the filing of nomination papers for a Hawai'i State <br />Senate office under Section 7, Article II of the Hawai'i State Constitution. <br />IV. Conclusion. <br />Based on the foregoing, Article XIII, Section 13-1 (f) (9) of the Hawaii County <br />Charter is consistent with Article II, Section 7 of the Hawai'i State Constitution and a <br />