Laserfiche WebLink
REPLOGLE: I have a little one. So, the landowner is purchasing the two adjacent properties. <br />MARTIN: Yes, to each side. <br />REPLOGLE: Okay. And, nobody is—he's not going to sell them and nobody is going to build <br />there or it will be if you want to live next to a—we've kind of been through this show. <br />MARTIN: Yes. <br />REPLOGLE: So, is he planning to leave that open space, dedicate that to no one living there <br />or? <br />MARTIN: I don't know what his future intentions are, but in any event, if he was to sell it, the <br />tower would be existing and then people would know that it was there. <br />REPLOGLE: People would have the choice of not living there or living there. <br />MARTIN: That's right. <br />REPLOGLE: Okay. <br />AGUINALDO: Mr. Commissioner, I have a question. As far as because of the trees, branches, <br />trying to blend in, and the wind load, it's not meeting the criteria, on the height 198 feet, correct? <br />MARTIN: That's right. <br />AGUINALDO: Does it require like a beacon? <br />MARTIN: No, and it was originally was designed for 200, and I asked them to reduce it two feet <br />so that we could remove that lighting requirement by the F.A.A. <br />AGUINALDO: And, my second question is why does it have to be—you got three acres, why <br />does the cell tower always have to be furthest in the back of the property? <br />MARTIN: This is where the landowner wanted it. He plans on building a home on that property <br />and so he wanted to use the rest of the property for that purpose. <br />AGUINALDO: Okay. <br />CLARKSON: And, there have been no complaints from any adjacent landowners about the <br />construction of the tower? <br />MARTIN: I received one phone call from a lady that was on the back side about five lots down, <br />and she didn't like it but said she would not contest it. <br />CLARKSON: Any further questions for Applicant? <br />EXHIBIT B <br />4 <br />