Laserfiche WebLink
CLARKSON: Well, I don't know whether—are you going to ask a question of the testifiers? <br />YEE: No, I'm not asking a question. <br />CLARKSON: Oh, hold on a second then. Are there any further questions for the testifiers here? <br />If not, thank you. Please be seated. Go ahead. <br />YEE: I want to clarify my term of floodgates. I think it's really important. You know, within <br />the Planning Department, we see numerous requests to do things on ag land because it typically <br />is the cheapest land that we have on the island, so everybody has the greatest idea `cause it's the <br />cheapest land they can get, and so we get a bunch of ideas for things. So, it's not necessary I <br />expect a huge multi-million dollar project to be going all along the bypass, but it will invite every <br />person who has some kind of bright idea `cause it's cheap and it's certainly the land's probably <br />not getting more expensive recently, to want to invite a Special Permit idea. Okay, so that's <br />what I meant by that. <br />I also wanted to be clear that part of what led me to the denial recommendation is the absence of <br />an access study. Right? If safety is such a big issue, you know, trying to have that to, to be able <br />to analyze that would certainly be critical. I totally understand that as a small business owner, <br />you're not a big developer, trying to expend funds before you have a permit is difficult, okay? <br />Sometimes, impossible. I acknowledge that. I also during the presentation you heard that, you <br />know, typically in an Urban zoned area, we take a look at rezones over a Special Permit. It <br />doesn't always have to happen, but there were these other avenues, and we heard Christian start <br />off that, you know, we had warned against kind of where we're at early on. The Applicant still <br />wanted to bring it forward, and so, in the absence of some of these things, we still went with the <br />denial. <br />And, finally, there was a comment around all the substandard lots in the Puna area. I really want <br />to be clear that Puna is substandard. Lack of water, lack of sewer. Recently, I was accused that I <br />have a bias against Puna. It's not that I have a bias against Puna, but through General Plan, <br />through CDP, we have tools which we can use to increase the growth rate or decrease the growth <br />rate, and when we have substandard areas, we look at tools that possibly could slow down the <br />growth rate because we can't keep up with, with, you know, the demands in the substandard <br />area. <br />So, we're in this job of trying not to, try to provide for folks while trying not to perpetuate a <br />greater problem for the County, and it's a difficult challenging situation. The lava eruption <br />certainly has exasperated trying to find that correct balance. So, no easy answers but I wanted <br />folks to understand my perspective on this. <br />CLARKSON: If there are noI think we'll wait Zendo until there's discussion. Let's get <br />through the closing of public testimony if there's a motion for that. <br />IKEDA: Move to close public testimony. <br />EXHIBIT E <br />21 <br />