2018-10-18 Leeward Exh C (AMEND REZ 926)

Home

trying to work with them to fix, not just this kind of situation but all of them. How we leverage CRC’s concern would be something we are looking into, too. VITOUSEK: Right, I mean, for us I don’t think that the County is in the place where we can solve the State’s problems for them, but the County has its own requirements under the law, under State Historic Preservation Law, and I feel like in this particular case— HALL: Sorry, what statute are you talking about? VITOUSEK: Hawai‘i Revised Statutes Chapter 6E-42. HALL: Okay, thank you. VITOUSEK: That the County can step in and complete these requirements so that this application can proceed. That being said, I have a couple of more questions on the preservation plan. Does this preservation plan that’s under review affect the entire project area? LIM: It affects the KD side, KD Acquisition side. Hualālai Resort has its own set of archaeological reports. VITOUSEK: Okay, so it is not just a preservation plan for the park, public access area, but for the entire development as a whole? KNABLE: No, the preservation, long-term preservation plan is purely for the Kalaemano Preserve, which is the area, the cultural preserve that Christian is pointing to right there. VITOUSEK: And is there another preservation plan that covers the development area? KNABLE: Yes, there was one that was completed, that allowed these folks to go in and apply for their grading permits for the development that’s there. VITOUSEK: You know, one of the potential conditions that, you know, with Chairman’s question about adding additional conditions, I have wondered about was this doesn’t seem like it has any conditions, which requires the applicant to uphold the terms of their mitigation plans. The only historic preservation related question is to report any inadvertent discoveries. And in the, you know, the agenda item that will be discussed later on, there is adding a condition to, “The applicant shall comply with mitigation and preservation plans approved by the Department of Land and Natural Resources.” And, to me, something being added into their requiring the applicant to continue to uphold their approved mitigation plans would be, would make sense to me. KAY: Yeah, I’m not sure if the applicant can speak to this. There is Condition U relative to, or related to the integrated resource management plan, which was made available as an appendix to the original ordinance, and it says, “The implementation recommendations and management 14 EXHIBIT C