Laserfiche WebLink
<br />KAY: Commissioner Kealoha? <br /> <br />KEALOHA: Aye. <br /> <br />KAY: Commissioner Vitousek? <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: Aye. <br /> <br />KAY: Commissioner Yates? <br /> <br />YATES: Aye. <br /> <br />KAY: And Chair Unger? <br /> <br />UNGER: Aye. <br /> <br />KAY: Thank you. Mr. Chair, motion carries, five-nothing. <br /> <br />UNGER: So, again, we’d like to open the floor to the second motion to the same agenda item in <br />regards to the extension request, or discussion, and conditions associated with the development. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: So, I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council <br />on the request to amend Project District Ordinance 99 42, based on the Planning Director’s <br />recommendation, findings, and proposed amended conditions, which shall be adopted; the <br />amended conditions include the updated language on the preservation plan and mitigation plan <br />being upheld that was read in by the County Planning staff; and we’d also like to include our <br />recommendation to the Planning Department and to the County Council that the public access <br />conditions be evaluated so that they are not tied to the completion of the golf course but to a <br />more publicly beneficial and mutually beneficial time period. <br /> <br />YATES: I second the motion. <br /> <br />UNGER: Motion by Commissioner Vitousek, second by Commissioner Yates. The floor is <br />open for discussion. Hearing no further discussion, roll call. <br /> <br />KAY: Mr. Chair, if I may — <br /> <br />UNGER: Oh, yes. <br /> <br />KAY: — I’d just like to clarify. The question is to “more mutually publicly beneficial <br />timeline”; it is kind of vague, and I’m not sure if that was on purpose or — <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: It is — <br /> <br />KAY: Okay. <br />20 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />