My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-10-18 Leeward Exh C (AMEND REZ 926)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2018
>
2018-10-18 Leeward Exh C (AMEND REZ 926)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2018 11:08:13 AM
Creation date
12/12/2018 11:08:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />time extension. Furthermore, the ordinance lacks the standard administrative time extension <br />condition. The applicants believe that this condition was omitted inadvertently, citing other <br />Project District Ordinances in the general time frame that were adopted, which included the <br />administrative time extension condition. Given the lack of clear guidance in the record on the <br />reasons or intentions of the Planning Department, Planning Commission and County Council <br />regarding what to do at the end of the 20-year period, the applicant is requesting a determination <br />on the need for a formal time extension. <br /> <br />So, just, again, the County zoning for the planning area is a Project District, which allow for a <br />mix of uses that I talked about before. And other zoning surrounding area is Open as indicated <br />in green, and then other Resort and Multiple-Family zonings are indicated in the pink, purple and <br />mustard colors. <br /> <br />The State Land Use designation for the project area is Urban as indicated in red, with the <br />surrounding area is Conservation. <br /> <br />The General Plan designation for the property is for the most part Resort Node as indicated in <br />purple and some Open along the shoreline and Conservation is surrounding the property as well. <br /> <br />Here is an aerial photograph of the subject project area. Again, we’ve got Queen Ka‘ahumanu <br />Highway running generally east-west through the slide, and then you’ve got, generally this area <br />to the south is Lot 4-B, which is the Hualālai Resort, and then the lot to the north is 4-A, which is <br />Kaūpūlehu as identified by the applicant.ʻ <br /> <br />Here is the applicant’s site plan for 4-A. And, again, you can see some of the development has <br />taken place already. According to the applicant, approximately 80 single-family residential lots <br />and associated subdivision improvements, including roadways and utilities, the Kaūpūlehu ʻ <br />Beach Club, set-asides for the coastal planning areas, which are kind of in this area here, as well <br />as the interpretive center, which is generally located here, and the Kaūpūlehu private wastewater ʻ <br />treatment plant. The applicants intend to develop additional 425 single- and multiple-family <br />residential units within Lot 4-A over the next 20 years, as well as an 18-hole golf course, golf <br />clubhouse and commercial retail opportunities. And just for your reference, here is Lot 4-A and <br />Lot 4-B. It’s here closer to, in this case, to the east. <br /> <br />Here is Lot 4-A. This is showing much more development that’s already taken place. They are <br />indicated that approximately 76 single-family residential lots, three multiple-family residential <br />lots and 20 multiple-family residential units and associated subdivision improvements have <br />already taken place in addition to the back-nine golf holes for the Keolu Golf Course. The <br />applicant anticipates approximately 25 more residential units within Lot 4-B over the next two to <br />three years. That’s in this general undeveloped area. <br /> <br />So, in order to determine kind of these multiple questions, the first question being whether or not <br />a time extension is needed, or a formal request for a time extension is needed, we took kind of a <br />deep dive into the record to determine if there was anything in the record form the original <br />rezone, any testimony or information at Planning Commission or at County Council, and here is <br />ultimately what we found: <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.