Laserfiche WebLink
Reduction of the funding assessed, and capping the total, would make the purchases of the parcels that have been <br />proposed for protection out of the question. Your proposal would hobble the work of the volunteer PONC committee <br />and the Finance Department with unrealistic caps of the funds that can be utilized to match with other funding agencies <br />to purchase the parcels. <br />Your proposal to delete the clause that protects the land from sale in perpetuity would throw into doubt any <br />participation by the agencies with matching funds, such as the Legacy Lands Commission, the US Fish and Wildlife <br />Service or the Trust for Public Lands. Providing funds to match under circumstances where the land could later be <br />disposed of to fund other county activities would not make any sense. <br />The maintenance fund is critical to the protection, support and upkeep of the lands purchased by the funds, and should <br />not be allocated for other uses by the County Council and the Mayor. The fund should be made available to community <br />groups and non -profits the are locally supporting, cleaning and maintaining the parcels they worked hard to obtain. The <br />funds have been poorly administered, and are inefficiently allocated; this situation needs to improve, but making the <br />fund subject to the whim of the council is not an improvement. We intend to support a proposal to amend the <br />maintenance fund at your next charter commission meeting in January. <br />The goal of Sierra Club is to strengthen the 2% Land Fund by improving the way properties are acquired and by awarding <br />stewardship grants funded by the maintenance to help community groups to care for these lands. From 2006 to today, <br />citizens have proposed 180 properties and only 14 have been acquired. The process has been slow and fraught with <br />road -blocks, and we propose ways to make the process more efficient. <br />We urge the commission not to support the proposed change (CA -7) to the Charter, and not to send it to First <br />Reading, but instead to strengthen the provision by supporting Comm 24 CA -9. <br />We support Comm 7.6 for the following reasons: <br />A senior staff person shall be hired by the Department of Finance and work ONLY on the 2% Land Fund program. This <br />staff position is in addition to the staff person who works with the Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources <br />Commission <br />The salary shall be funded from the 2% Land Fund.This is a benefit to the Department of Finance, because it will erase <br />one staff salary, since the salary does not come from their budget, but from the Land Fund. <br />This proposed amendment does NOT delete the Perpetuity Protection clause: "This property (or easement) was <br />acquired with money from the Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Fund. It shall be held in <br />perpetuity for the use and enjoyment of the people of Hawai'i County and may not be sold, mortgaged, traded or <br />transferred in any way." <br />2 <br />