My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-01-10 (draft) Cost of Government Commission minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2018-2019
>
2019-01-10 (draft) Cost of Government Commission minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2019 6:13:10 AM
Creation date
1/24/2019 6:13:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cost of Government Commission <br />January 10, 2019 meeting minutes <br />th <br />Okay do I need to move that we have our reports in to me by the 27 is that something <br />that needs to be done? <br /> <br /> Arthurs: I just have a question with regards to the final formatting. I liked what <br />you and Lenard has together and it is very concise it has the budget figures it has the <br />recommendation and the result. Do we need to add what Roy kept referring to as an <br />operating principle or is that over-arching thing or because like for our particular area I <br />just put this together the operating principle the citizen rate of Hawaii county bears <br />some level of responsibility in seeing that seniors age in adequate housing <br />accommodations according to their level of independence in able to drive and level of <br />dependence or unable to drive and those are definitions of the Office of Aging. So do <br />we want to do something about some principle? <br /> <br /> Jones: Well I had thought we were at least going to start with a paragraph for <br />each of our sub-committees in terms of that overarching so in other words all of these <br />recommendations from parks and rec, there probably should be a paragraph about that <br />that addresses that overarching theory that Mr. Takemoto was talking about I think there <br />is room for that and I think that is also where the personality of this commission comes <br />through and how we are responding to that overarching theme. <br /> <br /> Arthurs: And then also to indicate perhaps the individual that we spoke with. <br /> <br /> Jones: I am a little nervous about that. Only because there has been different <br />levels of acceptance of cooperation so I don’t really want to put anyone on the hot seat <br />because I asked and they didn’t come back to me. I’m really trying to keep this down to <br />a very specific report from this commission on what we recommend and why if you want <br />to acknowledge someone’s assistance again that first paragraph of this is our sub- <br />committee and this is what we have reviewed and these are the overlying principles that <br />would be the place to do it. I would think but, again, few words. The fewer words the <br />better. I wanted to first acknowledge Mr. McIntosh do you have something you wanted <br />to say? <br /> <br /> McIntosh: No you covered it. <br /> <br /> Arthurs: Oh okay. So that would be the basic format. Thank you. <br /> <br /> Jones: Can you read Mrs. Hopkins notes into the records for us? <br /> <br /> Arthurs: Yes I’ve read that. Yeah so any acknowledgement of the individuals that <br />we might have spoken with if we include those to be in the appendix is that what I am <br />seeing? <br /> <br /> Jones: Oh I see what she means it says the issue that Barbara brought could be <br />articulated in the introduction of the report and we could include the sources as <br />appendices at the end of the report. So that is not a bad idea either. Especially if you <br />quote somebody or someone gave you specific information I think and appendix at the <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.