My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-11-28 Meeting Minutes (EMC)
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Environmental Management Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
2018-11-28 Meeting Minutes (EMC)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2019 11:01:01 AM
Creation date
1/24/2019 10:59:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion, second, and vote: Commissioner Fulton moved that the committee be <br />comprised of Commissioner Fritz, Chair Bennett, and herself. Vice Chair Olson seconded <br />the motion, and all commissioners voted aye. <br /> <br /> Chair Bennett said a preliminary report by the committee will be placed on the <br />January agenda. <br /> <br />b. Discussion on Bill 192 (Draft 2), which was referred by the County <br />Council’s Environmental Management Committee to this Commission <br />for comment and recommendation. Bill 192 seeks to establish an <br />Environmental Quality Control Program to mitigate nuisance factors at <br />County facilities managed by the Department of Environmental <br />Management, such as improperly handled refuse and wastewater, feral <br />cats, dogs, and other animals abandoned or released at DEM facilities. <br /> <br /> Motion and second: Vice Chair Olson moved to approve the bill so it could be <br />discussed. Commissioner Fritz seconded the motion. <br /> <br /> Director Kucharski said that Bill 192 expands upon the responsibility of DEM and <br />that he is somewhat torn by it. DEM is already doing what the bill seeks, but without a <br />comprehensive environmental quality control program and human impact study. Those <br />programs are already required by their permits or by federal law. Codifying in a separate <br />program the things DEM does in complying with their permits will take personnel, time, <br />and funding, which DEM does not have and which is not provided for in the bill. The bill <br />says the director is to request sufficient resources, but it does not say from whom. <br /> <br /> The department is already mandated, as a permit condition, to deal with feral <br />animals at their facilities. He is torn as to how they could fit the bill’s requirements into <br />their current operations without changing prioritizations and doing less of something else. <br />He also does not know how they would pay for the bill’s requirements, and the priority it <br />demands is not one of his top priorities as director. <br /> <br /> Chair Bennett said developing a comprehensive environmental quality control <br />program requires monitoring and feedback loops. It is not something easy to do. <br />Interpreted loosely, it would take a blank check to pay for it. <br /> <br /> Vice Chair Olson said he had spoken with Councilmember O’Hara, the drafter of the <br />bill. It was thought the bill would make the County Council more aware of what DEM has to <br />do. What the additional costs are don’t pop up in the legislative process. The Council needs <br />to know that DEM is not just about hauling trash and greenwaste. DEM has a commanding <br />control of all its facilities, which have ancillary expenses that can run up. These expenses <br />need to be known. The money to pay for them is coming out of the Solid Waste budgets, <br />but they do not show up as line items. If they did, the director would have an opportunity <br />to ask for additional funds. <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.