My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHARTER 2018-12-14 (2018-2020)
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2018
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHARTER 2018-12-14 (2018-2020)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2019 1:27:21 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 1:31:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawai`i County Charter Comrnission-6 December 14, 2018 <br />today. Those lands are claimed by individuals whether it be plantation or <br />ranchers to own the land and the 1.8 million acres the Republic of Hawai`i <br />consists of U.S. citizens ceded it to the United States in 1898 by joint resolution. <br />These lands later under the 1900 Organic Act became, in 1920 became Hawaiian <br />Homes Land which is based on the Northwest Ordinance. You got a blood <br />quantum and homestead programs. In 1959 those lands were transferred to the <br />territory of Hawai`i which as admitted into the Union as a state which it is not. <br />They only could admit a state into the Union. Here the territory of Hawai`i was <br />admitted to the Union as a state and those 1.8 million acres were illegally sold or <br />reduced to 200,00 acres only called Hawaiian Home Lands and all subject to the <br />Northwest Ordinance which its limit is article five. The most recent case, well, <br />you got Cy vs. Clinton and most recently Cy vs. Trump, September, 2018. They <br />all cite the Article Four, Section 3, Clause 2 which is limited to the Northwest <br />Ordinance Article 5 only, the political question. The question here is the <br />Hawaiian Kingdom. We are totally separate from the United States. The United <br />States only has 13 states, Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3. There is no amendment. <br />How they have been getting away with all of this is illegal treaties based on the <br />Northwest Ordinance. The Reciprocity Treaty of 1875 was not signed by King <br />Kalakaua, nor was it signed by the U.S. President under Article 2, Section 2, <br />Clause 1. It was done by the three stooges. Three United States citizens who did <br />not have authority under the U.S. Constitution to represent the United States in a <br />treaty, nor the Hawaiian Kingdom. You got Fish, Allen, and Carter. The same <br />goes with Japan's constitution after World War II, or I should say the treaty. It <br />was done by General McArthur on the battleship, U.S. Arany General McArthur <br />had no authority to sign an unconditional surrender on the battleship at Tokyo <br />Bay and he also wrote Japan's Constitution which still exists today. Nowhere in <br />the U.S. Constitution will you find that except they have been stretching the <br />Northwest Ordinance under Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution <br />to do all kinds of wonderful things that's illegal like signing, doing illegal treaties, <br />occupying foreign countries and so forth. <br />Back to the lands here, the crown and government lands. These are not public <br />lands. You don't have public trust doctrine. It does not apply here. But these <br />lands are only leased out and right now land speculation, they are doing land <br />speculation under the Northwest Ordinance. With that I will end with the <br />Queen's protest of January 17, 1893 against U.S. Minister Stevens that has yet to <br />go to the U.S. Supreme Court, Article 3, Section 2, Clause 2, original but limited <br />jurisdiction, and the other one is the illegal application of the Northwest <br />Ordinance to this Kingdom through a Reciprocity Treaty of 1875. It wasn't <br />signed by either the King Kalakaua or the U.S. President. I will leave you a copy <br />of the Reciprocity Treaty to make this a part of the record. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Thank you for your testimony. If I could ask Sammie Stanbro to <br />come to the table. Mr. Harrold. <br />GARY HARROLD: Proposal No. CA -7 in opposition and Proposal No. CA -9 in support. <br />Page 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.