Laserfiche WebLink
Hawai`i County Charter Commission -6 December 14, 2018 <br />AARON CHUNG: <br />you to leave the fund as it is and to in support of adding a dedicated person for <br />management so that it is well managed and maintained. Thank you. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Thank you for your testimony. If I could ask Nelson Ho to <br />please come to the table. <br />Proposal No. CA -7 in support and commenting. <br />MR. CHUNG: Can you hear me? <br />CHR. ADAMS: Mr. Chung. <br />MR. CHUNG: Good afternoon and thank you all for your hard work. You know <br />I had a nice discussion earlier before you convened. It was with Sammie <br />Stansboro and Jon Olson, two people whom I have a great deal of respect for and <br />it had to do with this matter. And you know, to be quite frank I wasn't really <br />aware of the specifics of the proposal, I am talking about CA -7, and I am going to <br />give you guys, first of all I just want to say I think most of you know I am on the <br />Hawai`i County Council but I am not here as a Council person. I am just here as <br />Joe Q. Public, a person also who has some experience though making decisions at <br />the County Council level. <br />You know, back in 2004, and that is right when Bobby Jean had just left the <br />County Council, we took up the matter of the public lands two percent and I voted <br />in favor of that, to send it to the County, to the voters as a Charter Amendment. <br />However, the measure failed for lack of a super majority. It was a five to four <br />vote but it didn't get sent to the voters at that time and then subsequent councils <br />sent it up and it was later ratified by the voters. But over the years, having seen it <br />in its application, I have come to reconsider my position. I am not saying that <br />acquiring land, public lands is necessarily a bad thing, in fact it is a good thing. <br />But when I look over this, and this is the first time I have seen this, you know <br />there is a lot of talk about a cap, a one percent cap. When I read this, unless I am <br />reading it wrong or the Exhibit A that I have is incorrect, it is not a cap, a one <br />percent cap, it is a minimum. So it actually provides based on my reading, it <br />could go two percent, three percent, or more based on the fiscal condition of the <br />County. But there shall be a one percent minimum. I think this is a sensible <br />compromise to our situation. <br />No other program in the County of Hawai`i occupies this type of priority standing <br />where you can take off right off from our total revenues a certain percentage to <br />acquire certain things whether it be for Parks and Recreation, Police, Public <br />Safety, nothing, only the acquisition of public lands. It is wreaking havoc on our <br />County budget. Back then when I voted in favor of this provision, I said I am in <br />support of it, I think it is a good thing but it will also at some point result in a tax <br />increase. It has to and that is what is going to happen. It is happening right now. <br />So if you like tax increases well then keep it at two percent, but I think we should <br />Page 33 <br />