Laserfiche WebLink
Hawai`i County Charter Commission -6 December 14, 2018 <br />Commissioner Hamano. <br />MR. HAMANO: Thank you Chair Adams. I have read a lot and heard a lot of <br />public testimony against reducing the two percent PONC fund set aside and I <br />accept and I wholeheartedly agree with a lot of the testimony that supports the <br />PONC fund. But again, the question is really at least one of the questions is how <br />much you know, should the County of Hawai`i be required to set aside and your <br />ad hoc committee you know investigated whether the amount of the set aside was <br />appropriate and found that it was too high in light of the County revenues and in <br />light of what other counties allowed. The majority of the ad hoc committee <br />thought that the appropriate set aside should be reduced from two percent to point <br />five percent. CA -7 you know, tries to seek a balance there of setting aside a total <br />of one percent which would include a .25 percent for the maintenance fund. <br />Hawai`i County's two percent set aside for the PONC acquisition fund is more <br />than double the next highest set aside which is Maui County, which has a one <br />percent set aside. There appears to be no justifiable reason to mandate a spending <br />provision in the County Charter which is a non-essential government service that <br />is more than 100% greater than what other counties in Hawai`i provide for. The <br />proposed Charter Amendment which is a one percent set aside for PONC related <br />activity is only the minimum amount that is mandated. There is nothing to <br />prevent the County Council from appropriating more if there is a great need for <br />PONC funds for the fiscal year. And if the public so wishes, it can come to the <br />County Council. But this is a Charter provision and with a Charter provision <br />there is no out out of it and the Council nor anybody else can set that aside unless <br />there is a you know, Charter amendment which comes through a long process or <br />through this process which comes along every ten years. <br />Moreover, while I think it is still a good government public policy to set aside <br />funds to acquire lands for public use as stated in the proposed amendment, we <br />need to be mindful of the fact that Hawai`i County has about 1.3 million acres of <br />land classified by the Hawai`i State Land Use Commission (LUC) as conservation <br />lands. More than half of the land in Hawai`i County is classified by the LUC as <br />conservation land. The proposed amendment to the current PONC provision is a <br />more reasonable and fiscally responsible approach to the PONC related activity. <br />Lastly, though often stated testimony that the voting public approved the current <br />PONC set aside about three straight times is not I think, entirely correct because <br />at least in one of those times, the voting public voted for the one percent. I think <br />that was made clear. There was one time when the voting public voted for the <br />one percent you know. I strongly believe that if the voting public were informed <br />that Hawai`i County's PONC Charter provision of essentially a 2.25 percent set <br />aside from RPT (Real Property Tax) revenues, is over 100% greater than other <br />Hawai`i Counties, that they would approve a lowering of the PONC set aside rate. <br />Page 42 <br />