Laserfiche WebLink
Hawai`i County Charter Commission -7 January 25, 2019 <br />purchasing land and CA -13 could allow the fund to be completely raided by the <br />Administration for anything the Mayor or the Council considers an emergency. <br />That is not acceptable. <br />Please reject CA -7 which reduces the percentage for the land fund by almost two - <br />third which would make it impossible to purchase any significant lands. It would <br />also allow the Administration to remove the maintenance fund, where it would be <br />at the whims of the Mayor and Council. The deletion of the language that <br />protects the ownership of the public... it would give the Administration the power <br />to sell it. Who would be willing to give matching funds for land if they know the <br />County could eventually sell the land? These two charter amendments are a slap <br />in the face to the citizens who have clearly supported the land fund. <br />Please go forward to put CA -9 on the ballot. It is the only insurance or assurance <br />that the lands will be administered and open up possibilities for stewardship by <br />members of the public and for other funding. Thank you very much. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Thank you. Our next speaker please. <br />DWIGHT VICENTE: Communication No. 4 and Communication No. 7, commenting. <br />MR. VICENTE: Good afternoon my name is Dwight Vicente. I am representing <br />the Hawaiian Kingdom. Communication No. 2, Number 6, Communication <br />24.38. The problem with the lands here you have the 2.4 million acres under <br />lease contract with 25 year term contract under King Kalakaua. The problem was <br />those people there were leasing lands when the lease ended, they claimed they <br />owned the land. And the other problem is in 1898 the Americans calling <br />themselves the Republic of Hawai`i gave to the United States 1.8 million acres of <br />crown and government lands which they rebranded in 1920 as Hawaiian Homes <br />and they applied the Public Trust Doctrine to it. These lands are actually crown <br />and government lands, all subject to native tenant rights but yet, you will find <br />nowhere in the County Charter that they recognize native tenant rights to the land. <br />Number 7, the director is applying foreign law to the crown and government <br />lands. In other words they are doing land speculation based on the Northwest <br />Ordinance of 1787. These are crown and government lands not to be speculated <br />on. They are all subject to native tenant rights. So a lot of the information or <br />what little information that the director has, there is a large gap in the history. <br />They will tell you it is either a royal land patent or government land grant and <br />they will disappear and come up with something new. A new scheme that try to <br />divert the attention from the crown and government lands to now somebody <br />owns—some individual foreigner owns these public, these crown and government <br />lands. <br />This Kingdom has no public lands. Public lands is the Indian lands in the Ohio <br />River Valley. It doesn't extend in any way, shape, or form to this Kingdom. The <br />Page 5 <br />