Laserfiche WebLink
eastern boundaries," we'll change boundary to boundaries, "of the property to mitigate adverse <br />noise and visual impacts to the adjacent properties." And, then it says, "The stone wall and <br />landscaping shall be indicated on the plans" for the proposed mitigation, so that shouldn't <br />change. There's no differentiation there on location. <br />RAFFIPIY: I second the amended motion. <br />CLARKSON: All those in favor? <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br />CLARKSON: Opposed? Ok, the amendment carries. Now, we'll do a roll call, please on the <br />original motion. <br />KAY: All right. Thank you, Mr. Chair. I can take that vote. There's still the question of <br />Condition G in terms of the access limitation. Did you want to address that as well? <br />CLARKSON: Thank you for the reminder. <br />KAY: Thank you. <br />IKEDA: Do we have to make another amendment? Withdraw? Can? <br />KAY: Yeah, it might be better to withdraw the motion. <br />IKEDA: We'll withdraw the motion, and we'll add on—is it to shorten the left—was it <br />shorten— <br />HALL: I think just add this condition. <br />IKEDA: We'll just add, we'll add Mr <br />RAFFIPIY: Question, Mr. Chairman. So, that the issue right now is to, as stated in this <br />Condition Gto choose between the? <br />IKEDA: No, no, we're just going to add on. <br />RAFFIPIY: So, we just add on? <br />IKEDA: Yes. <br />RAFFIPIY: Okay. <br />KAY: If I may, if you're going to move forward with the proposed Condition G, you would <br />have to delete the existing condition limiting right -in, right -out restriction or restriction to right - <br />in, right -out and replace it or come up with some different language to replace that. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />14 <br />