My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-01-03 Hearing Transcript - Bank of HI REZ 18-231
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2019
>
2019-01-03 Hearing Transcript - Bank of HI REZ 18-231
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2019 11:38:33 AM
Creation date
2/8/2019 11:38:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLARKSON: Okay, is there any further discussion of this motion? Is there a second? <br />KAY: There was not a second yet. <br />REPLOGLE: Second. <br />CLARKSON: There being no <br />RAFFIPIY: So, the motion, the motion incorporated their, their requirement? <br />KAY: That's correct. So, the motion incorporated their proposed language as Condition G <br />which is now going to be Condition H with my suggested changes in terms of the West <br />Lanikaula and the proper Hawaiian diacritics. <br />RAFFIPIY: With a one-year, one-year <br />KAY: Correct. <br />RAFFIPIY: Okay. <br />KAY: As written as far as I understand. <br />CLARKSON: Together with the other amendments to the consolidation of the properties and the <br />five foot, nine inch stone wall on both. <br />RAFFIPIY: But, didn't we just read this no earlier than one year after the issuance of an <br />occupancy permit? <br />KAY: Yeah, that's correct. That is Condition—that's going to be new Condition G, pardon me, <br />new Condition H. It was proposed as Condition G from the Applicant this morning. So, aside <br />from the minor changes for clarity on the road name and the Hawaiian diacritics, it will go as <br />written. Is that correct, Mr. Ikeda, so my understanding is correct? <br />RAFFIPIY: But, that will only give them the one year. It wouldn't give after one year that <br />they're asking for. <br />KAY: As written, it would give them the one year to essentially determine whether or not the <br />left -turn is going to have impacts. <br />RAFFIPIY: Okay, got it. <br />KAY: After which Department of Public Works can require limiting access or other <br />improvements. <br />RAFFIPIY: Okay, thank you, yeah, makes sense. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.