My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-04-20 Liquor Adjudication Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Liquor Control
>
Liquor Adjudication Board
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
2017-04-20 Liquor Adjudication Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2017 8:14:13 AM
Creation date
7/21/2017 3:48:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It was more of a business-to-business availability. That's why we said it was available. <br /> We were ignorant on a lot of it. <br /> R. Smith: So, you weren't selling it? <br /> S. Smith: We weren't selling it. I did know that we couldn't sell. <br /> R. Smith: The other question I had was, when the Investigator was there, in his report <br /> he talked to Forrest and he asked, "If a person if a person did not make a donation of <br /> $5, would they be able to still get a glass of beer or wine?" The answer was no. <br /> S. Smith: Right. <br /> R. Smith: So you were selling it. If you were giving it for free, then you wouldn't have <br /> been selling it, but if you charged them, required a donation, you would be selling it. <br /> S. Smith: That's exactly right. I think they were all answering in support of the effort, <br /> but that wasn't the right answer. That was me not stressing enough the idea of a <br /> donation. It means that we were not too worried about it. If we were worried about it, <br /> we would have done the right thing and gotten a license. I think sometimes when folks <br /> are on the ground; they start to think that everyone is trying to get something for <br /> nothing. That is just the nature of people. But, we don't need it and that is probably our <br /> violation right there. <br /> R. Smith: I guess my concern too, the day before, you talked to Director Takase about <br /> what the rules were and he suggested since you don't have a license, you can ask for a <br /> donation, but you can't require a donation. Your signage and staff member that was <br /> providing liquor was saying you had to make a donation. Clearly a violation here. <br /> S. Smith: Communication is an art form that is being refined. I am refining on a daily <br /> basis. Sometimes you think people understand you from a perspective that you mean <br /> to speak, but without breaking down these things in elementary format and especially <br /> considering we are governed by somebody or something or body, that it's not about us. <br /> That is not how we think. It is my responsibility. I realize that I need to understand what <br /> the Commission wants from people in this community that handle alcohol and to let my <br /> staff know. We attempted to be great at this by asking for the help that was being <br /> donated. The Commission/officers did acknowledge we were working with some other <br /> of the local bartenders, who all had blue cards and it was because I wanted experience <br /> in the room. We're better now and we have events on the books right now. We have a <br /> great relationship developing with both the Waimea Brew House and the Kona Brewpub <br /> who are really supportive of youth programs and work in this town. We are better <br /> poised to take advantage of how to make that happen, especially considering our focus <br /> cliental. <br /> APRIL 20, 2017—LIQUOR ADJUDICATION BOARD MINUTES 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.