Laserfiche WebLink
Harry Kim <br />Mayor <br />County of Hawaii <br />Office of the Mayor <br />Wil Okabe <br />Managing Director <br />Barbara J. Kossow <br />Deputy Managing Director <br />25 Aupuni Street, Suite 2603 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 • (808) 961-8211 • Fax (808) 961-6553 <br />KONA: 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy., Bldg C • Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 <br />(808) 323-4444 • Fax (808) 323-4440 <br />February 19, 2019 <br />Representative Sylvia Luke, Chair <br />Committee on Finance <br />Representative Ty J.K. Cullen, Vice Chair <br />Committee on Finance <br />Dear Chair Luke, Vice Chair Cullen, and Committee Members: <br />RE: HB 631, HD1 Relating to Taxation <br />Thank you for the opportunity to testify on HB 631, HD1, which would authorize each County to impose a <br />surcharge on the State's transient accommodations tax. <br />We appreciate the innovative approach this bill brings to the table, and the recognition of the counties as <br />partners in the affairs of Hawaii governance. We do not shy away from the responsibilities that these bills would <br />place on the counties to raise their own revenue, and appreciate that the State would still "levy, assess, collect, and <br />otherwise administer the county surcharge," because it would be wasteful and prohibitive for each County to set up <br />parallel structures. <br />Having recognized the benefit of HB 631, we do have to express concerns. <br />Hawaii County gets 18.6% of the TAT revenue allocated to the counties, which most recently came out to <br />$19.2M. Hawaii Island does not generate 18.6% of the TAT, so to achieve the same revenue from a County -based <br />surcharge, the surcharge rate has not yet been calculated but surely would be very high. If the Legislature is not <br />willing to give us that much flexibility, or does not think such a rate would be good policy, then some other pathway <br />forward needs to be found. <br />An alternative is proposed in SB 198, in which the counties would be authorized to impose a surcharge of up <br />to 2%, while continuing to receive $103M under HRS 237D-6.5 with no change to the existing allocation formula. <br />We would ask this Committee to consider that approach, or some other mechanism that would be fair to all counties <br />and assure that none suffer a revenue loss, while still asking the counties to accept some responsibility for raising <br />their own operating capital. <br />Res+ectf ly Submitted, <br />Harry Kim <br />MAYOR <br />County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. <br />