My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019 01-29 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019 01-29 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2019 10:10:12 AM
Creation date
2/21/2019 9:47:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – January 29, 2019 <br />KU: This Kean, correct me if I’m wrong – for every money that State uses for <br />eradication – does the federal government match that? <br /> <br />RK: How do you look at that – when I said Section 6 \[unclear\] of Endangered <br />Species – that’s legislatively apportioned to the States – I’m not entirely sure <br />how whether or not that is matched – I don’t know about that – but you might <br />be referring to something similar as like Pittman-Robertson funds, which the <br />State will fund the full cost of a project – get an approval to do the project and <br />then the Feds – after the project is done – the Feds will basically reimburse <br />them 75% of the project. Pittman-Robertson funds – as far as I know and this <br />has been asked in the past too – I can’t prove it though but as far as I know <br />are not used toward any eradication-type actions or rather would be <br />prohibited from eradication-type actions – there is one thing, thought, about <br />Pittman-Robertson and federal dollars is that – I mentioned Section 6 – <br />there’s another section of the Endangered Species Act – I’m getting in the <br />weeds here – it’s called Section 7 – Section 7 is basically says that no federal <br />dollars can be used toward anything that is deemed detrimental to the <br />endangered species. This is determined by maybe the Pacific Office of the <br />Fish & Wildlife Service. So when we take State dollars to do a project – say <br />build a water unit on Mauna Kea like the previous testifiers have explained – <br />it’s – those water units are fenced – I can explain why they’re fenced – they’re <br />fenced because that money was matched with federal dollars – the Feds said <br />OK we’re matching you to build this water unit – Section 7 says we cannot <br />use any of the money to anything that would be detrimental to the <br />endangered species – detrimental maybe to the palila. The presence of <br />sheep on that mountain would be deemed detrimental to palila from them so <br />therefore they have to fence that water unit so no sheep can use it but birds <br />can because maybe birds aren’t deemed detrimental yet – so that’s the <br />balance between when someone – the State uses federal funds to do <br />something and when, you know, I mean, there’s been talk to try and say, oh, <br />how come we don’t just use State dollars all by itself, right? Don’t match it – <br />so it just comes with the rules – there’s talk about that too – but you know that <br />takes some influence to get done, so... I don’t know – just trying to be as <br />educational or as layman as I can about it. <br /> <br />OLD BUSINESS: <br /> <br />Papaikou Community Association – Fishing Community <br /> <br />BKK: Thank you, Ryan. Any other questions? Moving on to the Old Business - the <br />Papaikou Community Association – is there anybody from that association <br />here? Teresa, do you know? <br /> <br />BKK: We’ll skip over that unless anybody has any comments to make on that <br />because we don’t know too much information as far as what they wanted to <br />share. <br />16 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.