Laserfiche WebLink
Fed <br />/ Vol. 64, No. 40 / Thursday, March 2, 1989 / Rules and Regulations <br />Oa the matter of a review: Under <br />24.102(d). the Agency is required to <br />make a written offer. Offer tatters are <br />tienerally signed by someone at the <br />management leveL It is general FHWA <br />involved to have not i <br />lved in setting the amount clan <br />offer of Juat compensation. This process <br />would constitute a review where no <br />appraisal is made. Precisely how such <br />matters will be handled b within <br />Agency discretion. <br />A few comments objected to waiving <br />an appraisal for any reason. An Agency <br />has no obligation to waive the appraisal <br />of an acquisition if it prefers not to. <br />Section AIM i Criteria for Apprnrisals <br />Section 24.103(4 One Agency <br />described how it intended to integrate <br />the appraisal waiver provision la <br />f 24.102(c)(2) with oris section.n <br />appraisal standards. Many other <br />variations are also possible, but the <br />comment is summarized here for <br />purposes of illustration. In brief, <br />negotiators will; be instructed to dearly <br />explain to the owner the right to have an <br />appraisal made and in no way pressure <br />the owner to sign a waiver; acquisitions <br />valued between 3800 and $2,600 are to <br />be meted by sales in the project <br />airs, and will be approved by a review <br />appraiser prior to negotiations. As <br />described. tMs Agency to do <br />more than es intends <br />praisal <br />wenld always be a property owner <br />option; some value documentation will <br />be a requitement: and a reviewer's <br />approval is necessary is certain <br />circumstances. This description is <br />intended to illustrate the latitude an <br />agency has in implementing the <br />provisions of this Subpart. <br />Section 24.103faX2). One comment <br />recommended the requirement for a 5 - <br />year sales history be cut back to two or <br />three years. This recommended= was <br />not adopted, primarily because it <br />applies only when a detailed appraisal <br />is necessary. When a detailed appraisal <br />is not necessary, the agency may set a <br />different standard. <br />Section 24.104(a*9). A comment <br />recommended that a statement be added <br />to the effect that the appraiser must <br />explain the absence of more recent sales <br />data when the sales used are over e <br />mom old. This is viewed as a good <br />business practice on tha part of the <br />appraiser. but notes an essential <br />regulatory requirement. <br />Section 24.103(e). Three comments <br />recommended an i>taaase in the dollar <br />threshold from fiL50e to t5.010 <br />, <br />the same person can both appraise and <br />negotiate- The AIWA has notadopted <br />Incthis rerceonsedatinn <br />�r,.. .• <br />Section 24.101 Review of appraisals <br />Section 2L•1001. In response to a <br />comment. a minor editorial clarification <br />has been made to this section regarding <br />the role of the reviewing appraiser in <br />establishment of the Ageus offer of <br />Just compensation, <br />Section 24.105 Acquisition of Tenant - <br />awned Improvements <br />Four comments expressed a concern <br />with the matter of adequately protecting <br />the rights of a tenant owner of <br />improvements. One of these comments <br />recommended specific reference to <br />tenant owners be made at many points <br />within B. <br />FHWA has made no change because <br />it believes tenant owner interests ere <br />adequately protected. The language of <br />Subpart B is based on the premise that i'f <br />a tenant can demonstrate an ownership <br />interest in real property. that person is <br />an owner of real property to be acquired <br />befor treated sof this <br />�a� and is to <br />atach- <br />, =uFive commenter <br />t tory value or salvage <br />value measures of compensation to a <br />tenant ower are not fair and equitable <br />when the appraiser finds that all of the <br />value is in the land. with no value <br />attributable to the improvement As a <br />consequence. they "value in piece" measure ed nded a <br />compensation be added to this section. <br />cis WAtaape�t.a the duty this <br />urs. but the <br />provisions of <br />ao¢ of the UniformAct do not <br />permit it to accommodate the <br />recommendation. Section 30Z specifies <br />contributory value, or value for removal <br />(which has been implemented as <br />salvage <br />as the measures of <br />compensation. <br />However. there is some latitude <br />available under 126.103(e). Payment <br />under other applicable law" could <br />include provisions of State law and/or <br />relocation assistance benefits. Also, <br />contributory value can be viewed on a <br />temporary basin is the valuation <br />estimate process. FHWA believes the <br />basic objective is payment of an amount <br />of compensation which is just. <br />reasonable, and fair- <br />Two <br />airTwo comments ware received from <br />representatives of the outdoor <br />advertising industry. Both comments <br />focused on the way advertising signs aro <br />treated by #i 24-2(q), 24.106. and <br />24.303(e) a the regulation. <br />suggested that. pursuant to They <br />302 p <br />al the Uniform Act. all advertising sigma <br />covered by the Uniform Act should be <br />acquired as tenant owned _ • • nommen <br />Impr�ovem , and thavatseoi-a ,• in <br />laps before &sold lett • <br />used N determining the owner', <br />compensation. Neither of these <br />suggestions have been adopted. <br />pecific <br />anguage <br />rning <br />advertising sing sl i section10470) of <br />the Uniform Act makes it dear that <br />some. if not all, signowners should be <br />entitled to moving and related expenses <br />under section 202 of the Uniform Act, <br />rather than to compensation for a sign** <br />acquisition under section 902 <br />Furthermore. that language in section <br />101(7XD) was amended in the 1997 <br />Amendments to broaden the benefits <br />available to sigaownets under suction <br />202. For reconciled many years. <br />specifFHWA has <br />section � J U c language Act and <br />the more tenant improvements <br />� � <br />the Act by providing that an advertising <br />sign considered to be personas property, <br />wider State law should receive the <br />relocation benefits provided by section <br />202 end if considered to be reel <br />property. It accordance should <br />ith sectionF1 WA <br />believes this le the most reasonable <br />interpretation of the provisions of the <br />Uniform Act; audit aantiauee to be <br />reflected in this final nds. <br />When s sign le acquired <br />section <br />0 sumer on 302(b)( provides that <br />should receive the greater of <br />its ooateibatory Tebbe to the real <br />property or it, "fair market Mehra • • • <br />for removal from the real property." <br />FHWA that removal Interprets rs pew to mean <br />must be taken <br />into consideration indedete determining "fair <br />market value for removal," and believes <br />this le done in i 24.106 and 24.1(0) of <br />the regulation. <br />Subpart C --General Relocation <br />Requirement, <br />Sectio* 2L203 Relocation Notices <br />Section 24.203(o). A comment was <br />received that the term "as soon as <br />feasible" was not sufficiently specific. <br />FHWA considers this term to mean "as <br />son as practical" and does not believe <br />that any further elaboration is <br />eceother mar This t and several <br />comments addressed to <br />this section may have merit in <br />individual situations, but do not <br />necessitate changes in the regulations. <br />Displacing may wish to clarify <br />ui eular matters that aro of concern to <br />them in their operating instructions. <br />Sectionmment. definitional isresponse at <br />teat to acquire at notice efrelocetion, , <br />