Laserfiche WebLink
Register / Vol 54. No. 40 / Thursday.M <br />arch 2, 1989 / Rules and Regaled/ins <br />be <br />riate in <br />areas wheremoie homes afire treated <br />as real property under Slate law or <br />where an agency ham the option to <br />consider mobile homes to be either re <br />al <br />property or personal property. However. <br />some State laws consider mtoh la home' <br />to be persona/ p1operty may, and. <br />therefore. they may not be acquired as <br />realty. <br />Subpart Gr --Certification <br />This subpart implements one of the <br />most significant changes added by the <br />1987 Amendments. Aa such, PHWA has <br />a special interest in its implementation <br />and would appreciate receiving further <br />information on its use and effectiveness <br />Several respondents commented on <br />Subpart G. however no single comment. <br />or group of comments, was sufficiently <br />persuasive to necessitate a change la <br />the proposed text However. one <br />comment on f 24.403, Monitoring and <br />correto need for substantiv revisve action. did draw our ion of <br />zteos(b)- <br />Section 24.802 Cectrfcadan <br />Application <br />Two commenters recommended that <br />certification be made <br />dlract!y the head the Stats <br />agency to the Federal agency providing <br />assistance. rather- <br />thedesState evee , or the governor's <br />not adopt this <br />recommendaliou&T la <br />need for a toned ere is a'defimita <br />point within each State d <br />for the receipt' and screening of <br />certification applications. Consistent <br />with the principles of federallem, the th <br />Office of the Governor, u the Chief Mar th <br />Executive er in any State, is the <br />logical starting point for this process Fe <br />since the governor normally exercises <br />executive authority over the State w <br />agencies that are recipients of Federal nen <br />financial assistance or through which <br />Federal financial assistance is <br />channelled to sub -recipients at the local <br />level. all of whom are sub to the <br />Uniform Act and any of whom could <br />make application for certification <br />approval. The certification process does Sega <br />not alter the existing relationshipbe <br />State -level between load sub -recipients and the pe <br />redptegts of Federal <br />finandal asaIatenc�e. kis expelled that to <br />any certificationlnwi be ii de s <br />State -level t � begettay to of <br />instances the governor's <br />designee. In those or <br />end <br />wi <br />(city, county, etc) it the direcocal trecipient,inclas <br />and there is nes State level ancy geis <br />authorized, to pe'� inchn <br />the certification x .�v;�tiontaould be . <br />made directly to the governor, or the <br />governor's designee. <br />The governor. or a State office or <br />agency designated by the governor. <br />be able to standardise the process <br />develop an expertise in the prones <br />of applications. Further, the governor <br />his or her designee will be more able <br />assess the capabilities of those State <br />agenciea.seeklug to immure Federal <br />agency responeibiiities through the <br />certification process. A focal point of <br />this nature will be particularly <br />advantageous in processing <br />certifications froze a State agency <br />seeking certification approval from <br />than one Federal agency. <br />Two commenters indicated some <br />misunderstanding of the respons e <br />ding agency, <br />It is not intended Feder <br />funding agency endorse an approved <br />application received from the governor <br />or the governor's wee. if the Federal <br />aPWop<iata <br />indicatideficiencies program. <br />State The purpose of the <br />ertifyine <br />���g agency accept the ' <br />approved application without <br />can independent review is <br />the <br />threefold: <br />first.. theft �a�a the roleige[ <br />In evaluating the State s designee. <br />co It wi@�to <br />current stats of the F <br />funding agency's oversight tilts State <br />agendas; third. unless there are pre- <br />existing appropriate le rsf <br />efdencies, the certification approval <br />neon of the three <br />ts The <br />is <br />e basis for the written assessment of <br />e State capabllitiea to <br />operate er certification ;filch the <br />dent find agency must provide <br />hen the rcation application is <br />emitted to the Federal Lead agency. <br />Section 34.E Monitory and <br />recognition of a possible inconsistency, <br />between the requirements of 1 24, <br />and the assurances required b <br />24,4 <br />will and sections 210 and 305 of the f_'r,," <br />and Act. Asa consequence, f zd.®03(b) ins <br />�g revised and clarified to provide that if a <br />or State agency certifies. under State law <br />to and regulation, it can and will comply <br />with the provisions of the Uniform Am <br />which would otherwise be covered by <br />the sections 220 and 305 assurances and, <br />.then, fails to comply, the Federal agency <br />should withhold Federal financial <br />assistance in that State agency. <br />prof -tuns, projects, and activities <br />more affected by the Uniform Act <br />diminish certification process does not <br />responsibilities agency's fundamental <br />with the Uni Uniform �� ccebulalt <br />provisions referred iny those <br />and 305 assurances. It islsections.o t the <br />statute. that compliance with pions <br />which are the subject of the asaurances <br />is or paramount importance to the <br />coni! Federal fieancial'asaistance <br />of programs. projects, end activities <br />affected by the Uniform Act. <br />Far example, if Uniform Ad non_ <br />occurred in <br />th <br />ay lose tedprooject connection <br />withhold Federal &sandaal cardse its authority e <br />ain <br />until noing state compli� stancewith the <br />Corrective action <br />One respondent objected to the <br />Lo <br />dal Federal <br />assistance aif of <br />State <br />envy failed to comply with applicable <br />te w and regulation serving at the <br />sill loaf i certification. The respondent <br />rceiyed this to mean that the authority <br />Fedf Federal <br />�aul assistance is thhold approval a available to an <br />agency regardless of the source <br />the finanda; <br />course. is not the assistance. authority <br />the <br />theponsibility <br />thholding of Federal financialregarding <br />t� <br />Lance rests with each Federal <br />and any re deer dit 14 projects, prpgrams. <br />ci <br />comment did, howev d ve to the <br />In order to ensure coordination of <br />information ambmg Federal. oracle'that may have accepted a certification <br />from the same state agencylanguage <br />has been added to ; 24 403 (b) and (c) to <br />require that the lead <br />consulted by the FedWary <br />eral heeling agency <br />before any Federal funds are withheld <br />from a certified state agency or the <br />acceptance of a certification is revoked. <br />Asa A to Part 24—Additimeal <br />The appendix has been modified and <br />augmented toprovtde for better <br />understsndhregulations to r the section, or the <br />which pedalos. <br />Section 21.2(021 <br />been gadded trsons ea displaced <br />�nce od� <br />that some persona may ba temporarily <br />displaced tart amort displaced swung <br />because they have not been permanently <br />Section 24.102(m) <br />Fair rental to response to severe/ <br />comments concerning share -fetes rent, the <br />mmote saieteagenerally, has bean added to the <br />Section at <br />Axed payment for laming expenses--nan- <br />residsettel . P}IWA Au b <br />