Laserfiche WebLink
fM12 Federal Register / Vol. 54, No. 40 / Thursday. March 2, 1989 / Rules and R <br />DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION <br />Office of the <br />49 CFR Part 24 <br />[FitW .,...:st No. 87-22) <br />RIN 2125-A8 65 <br />Uniform Relocation Assistance and <br />Real Property Acquisition Regulations <br />for Feder and Federally Assisted <br />Programs <br />AGENCY: Federal Highway <br />Administration (FHWA), DOT. <br />ACTION: Final rule. <br />BusMY: This regulation establishes a <br />governmentwide single rule for the <br />implementation of statutory <br />amendments to the Uniform Relocation <br />Assistance and Real Property <br />Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (the <br />Uniform Act) made by the Uniform <br />Relocation Act Amendments of 1987 <br />Title IV of the Surface Transportation <br />and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act <br />of 1987 (1987 Amendments), Pub„ 4100- <br />17. 101 <br />00-17.101 Stat 2,48-258. The Uniform Act <br />applies to all Federal or federally <br />assisted activities that involve the <br />acquisition of real property or the <br />displacement aperient, including <br />displacements cawed by rehabilitation <br />and demolition activities. This <br />regulation is intended to ensure that the <br />implementation of the Uniform Act by <br />Federal agencies is. in fact. as uniform <br />and consistent as possible. while <br />encouraging State and local discretion hi <br />implementing the Uniform Acte <br />provisions. <br />DATE This regulation is effective March <br />2.1989. Further information concerning <br />agency implementation is provided <br />below. <br />FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />FD. i.ucknw, Chief, Program <br />Requirements Division. Office of Right - <br />of W ay, HRW-lo, (202) 368.0110 or <br />Reid Alsop, Office of the Chief Counsel. <br />HCC -4o, (202) 36e -13'n. The address is <br />Federal Highway Administration. 400 <br />Seventh Street SW., Washington. DC <br />20590. <br />SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: <br />Background <br />This regulation is the final step in the <br />development of a governmentwide <br />single rule for implementing the <br />Uniform Act. The background of <br />this development is described In <br />considerable detail in the preamble to <br />the interim final rule issued on <br />December 17. 1987 (52 FR 47994), and the <br />Notice al Proposed Rules (pj), <br />Issued on July 21.1988 (53 FR 27508), <br />and le not repeated here. <br />On February 27„ 1985, a Presidential <br />Memorandum was signed and publiahed <br />in the Federal Register on March 5. 1965 <br />(50 FR 8953), naming the Department of <br />Transportation (DOT) as the agency <br />with lead responsibility for the Uniform <br />Act. This led to the publication of a <br />multi -agency governmentwide common <br />rule on February 27, 1988 (51 FR 7000). <br />The 1987 Amendments named the <br />DOT as lead agency. The Secretary at <br />the delegated Department of asportation has <br />g responsibility to the <br />Federal Highway Administration <br />(FHWA). The 1987 Amendments recpdre <br />the lead agency, in coordination with <br />other Federal agencies. to issue roles, <br />establish procedures end make <br />interpretations to implement provisions <br />of the Uniform Act <br />Implementation of the 1887 <br />Amendmeute <br />On Tuesday. May 19;1987 (52 Flt <br />18788) the FHWA issued a Notice <br />describing significant changes in the law <br />and general plans to implement those <br />changes. On Tuesday. December 1. 1987 <br />(52 FR 45687) the FHWA issued a Notice <br />of Regulatory Intent giving further notice <br />of the specific regudatory actions that ft <br />and the other affected Federal agencies <br />would take to implement the 1987 <br />Amendments. <br />A few provisions of the 1987 <br />Amendments upon which the law le <br />expddt and allows for little. if any, <br />administrative disaetion or <br />Interpretation. and for which a period of <br />public notice and comment would have <br />been impractical. were implemented in <br />an interim final rule in Part 24 issued by <br />FHWA (52 FR 47994). on December 17. <br />1987. <br />On the same day (52 FR 48015)17 <br />Federal Departments and agencies that <br />administer the Uniform Act, and had <br />adopted the governmentwide common <br />mile, published interim final rules <br />rescinding the governmentwide common <br />rule from the codification of their <br />regulations and adopting in its place a <br />cross -referents to the governmentwide <br />single regulation published by FHWA at <br />49 CFR Part 24. The effective date for <br />these agency rescissions and cross <br />references varied, however all mach <br />actions were to take effect on or <br />April 2,1989. the date the 1987 <br />Amendments become mandatory. <br />An eighteenth Federal Department. <br />the Department of Housing and Urban <br />Development (HUD), was unable to join <br />the other Federal agencies in publishing - <br />an interim final rescission and alma <br />referencing,action se December " 121114.4t <br />of its.need to se <br />certain Congressional review <br />obligations. HUD subsequently. <br />published such an interim rule on <br />February 19, 1988 (53 FR 4964). <br />As discussed in the preamble to the <br />NPRM. no comments were received that <br />objected to the nee of the rescission and <br />crow -referencing actions by the various <br />Federal agencies concerned to establish <br />a governmentwide single regulation. The <br />only relevant comment objected to the <br />effective date of HUD's rescission and <br />cross-referencing action. HUD <br />considered that oomment but does not <br />believe it is feasible to change the date <br />for administrative reasons, in order to <br />best achieve a smooth transition to the <br />new requirements of the 1987 <br />Amendments. <br />The objective of she February 27.1985 <br />Presidential memorandum. and one of <br />the primary goals of the 1967 <br />Amendments. was to establish <br />governmentwide uniformity so as to <br />eliminate the differences and <br />inconsistencies among Federal agencies <br />that had plagued Federal <br />'implementation of the Uniform Act since <br />its enactment in 1971. These differences <br />and incaasisteadea had been <br />pert culady burdensome to State and <br />bbW governments that were <br />administering a variety of Federal <br />programs, and also, in some cases. <br />resulted in differences ln.the benefits <br />provided to persons in like <br />circumstances. <br />The MS Amendments dearly provide <br />that a single Federal lead agency will <br />promulgate a governmentwide single <br />role for the Uniform Act's <br />implementation. Accordingly, other <br />Federal agencies covered by the Act no <br />longer have independent statutory <br />authority to promulgate their own <br />separate Uniform Act regulations and, in <br />implementing the Uniform Act, must <br />follow the regulations published by the <br />lead agency. The Uniform Act's unique <br />in that it Imposes requirements directly <br />upon a large number of Federal and <br />Federally assisted programs, but assigns <br />the authority for the publication of all <br />necessary implementing regulations to <br />one lead agency. (Of course, such <br />regulations will continue to be <br />developed with the participation of HUD <br />and other Federal agendas). <br />Accordingly. because a <br />governmentwide single regulation <br />required by law. because of the waique <br />nature of the Uniform Act. because no <br />comments were received. and because <br />no useful purpose would be served by <br />hale 18 Federal ageodes take <br />adilitional regulatory action to formally <br />finellarthelt resdsalos and crow <br />the interim readssion <br />