My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-01-23 Meeting Minutes (EMC)
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Environmental Management Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
2019-01-23 Meeting Minutes (EMC)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2019 12:56:27 PM
Creation date
2/28/2019 12:53:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Commissioner Fulton brought up that at the previous meeting, they had created a <br />subcommittee which was to review alternatives to conventional wastewater treatment <br />plants. Chair Bennett said it was a hope and has yet to materialize. Also, it is outside the <br />purview of DEM, but that does not mean they have to remain silent. <br /> <br />b. Discussion on Bill 210, which proposes to increase wastewater service <br />charge rates to cover the costs of providing the services. The County <br />Council wants the Commission to discuss alternative funding options <br />other than sewer user fees and comment on the fee schedule options of <br />1 year, 3 years, or 5 years. A recommendation to Council is also <br />requested for these options. The Commission can also propose <br />alternatives to these scenarios. <br /> <br /> Chair Bennett said it appeared the Council feels that Bill 210 is repressive and puts <br />the burden on the existing sewer users, and is asking the EMC to look at what can be done <br />to soften the blow. He had prepared a draft letter from the EMC to the Council responding <br />in support of Bill 210, while also encouraging some alternatives for funding, operation, and <br />maintenance. He read his draft aloud: <br /> <br />Dear Chair Chung: At the last duly commissioned meeting of the Environmental <br />Management Commission, a unanimous vote of support was communicated to the <br />Council for Bill 210. Since that time, the chairman has been informed of concerns <br />about raising fees, especially for lower-income residents. We appreciate that concern, <br />and we encourage the Council to explore mechanisms for funding from all county <br />residents and visitors in order to keep the sewer system operating as required by state <br />and federal regulations. <br /> <br />Some members of the County Council have suggested the EMC provide an analysis of <br />financial options to fund sewer maintenance and operations. However, financing of <br />community infrastructure is both outside the charge and expertise of the EMC. <br /> <br />The EMC does offer some perspective as to why deferring maintenance and the <br />expertise to manage wastewater operations is simply not a wise course of action. The <br />sewer systems of the county were originally funded by a combination of federal, state, <br />and county funds. Thus, all persons have contributed in some fashion and all persons <br />benefit. Efficient sewer operations are critical for the public’s health and the beneficial <br />uses of the near coastal waters. Both issues are very large in the current public <br />discourse. <br /> <br />The sewer systems in both East and West Hawaiʻi are aging rapidly in a highly <br />corrosive marine environment. Now at 30 to 50 years of age, the rate of deterioration <br />is increasing, making repairs expensive and in some cases technically unsound. <br />Deferring maintenance can have the effect of making repairs as expensive as building <br />a new system. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.