Laserfiche WebLink
property; so I think they allowed the grubbing to take place after the archaeological study was <br />completed, so, that took place and I think it mentions that somewhere in the study that it was <br />allowed to go through. Thank you. <br /> <br />UNGER: Great, thank you. No other questions? \[None.\] You may be seated, thank you. At <br />this time we’d like to open up the hearing to public testimony, if anybody is interested in <br />testifying on this agenda item. Seeing no testifiers, Commissioners, I need a motion to close <br />public testimony. <br /> <br />SHIMAOKA: I motion that we close public testimony. <br /> <br />CHURCH: I’ll second it. <br /> <br />UNGER: We have a motion by Commissioner Shimaoka, second by Commissioner Church. All <br />in favor? <br /> <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br /> <br />UNGER: Opposed? \[None.\] Motion passes, public hearing is closed. Commissioners, at this <br />time the floor is open for a motion. <br /> <br />SHIMAOKA: Yeah, I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County <br />Council on the application for a Change of Zone, Docket No. REZ 17-00\[0\]219, based on the <br />Planning Director’s recommendation, which shall be adopted. <br /> <br />KEALOHA: I’ll second him. <br /> <br />UNGER: Motion by Commissioner Shimaoka, second by Commissioner Kealoha. The floor is <br />open for discussion. I support the project, I think for all the reasons that were listed by the <br />Planning Department; it’s infilling; it’s what our Community Development Plan calls for; the <br />infrastructure is there. I’m not a proponent of making any changes to the fair share. I guess the <br />policy is helpful and certainly guidance. But, in general, you know, I’m concerned about fair <br />share, and, you know, as these subdivisions continue on, do we have enough money for parks, <br />police, fire, etcetera. So I’m a proponent of the subdivision not making any changes. The <br />motion on the table does not call for those changes, so, to be clear, if we do approve this, it’s <br />without including any money spent on roadway development to go towards the other fair share <br />requirements. <br /> <br />KAY: Just so I can clarify, is that, was that your motion, Mr. Shimaoka? <br /> <br />SHIMAOKA: Yes. <br /> <br />KAY: Okay, thank you. <br /> <br />UNGER: Hearing no other comments, roll call, please. <br /> <br />7 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />