Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Schatz drew the Commissioners’ attention to Sheet G-1A Overall Site Plan Tenant Sign <br />Locations, and said that the green color indicated the signs that would be facing the interior of the <br />project and therefore would not require a sign permit. Ms. Bugado advised the applicant to be <br />cautious about the determination because any of those signs could become visible from the public <br />right-of-way at one point, in which case having a master plan in place would expedite the <br />permitting process so long as the sign was consistent with the master plan. Upon inquiry by <br />Commissioner Hetherington, Ms. Bugado clarified that the proposed Road B directly across from <br />Alahou Street was a private driveway to the project rather than a public right-of-way. <br /> <br />Chairman Roth summarized the consensus of the Commission that a font and color scheme should <br />be included in the proposed master plan, and that tenants who wished to diverge from it should <br />submit their individual proposal to the Commission for review and approval. <br /> <br /> Motion <br /> <br />Upon inquiry by Commissioner Hetherington, Ms. Bugado explained that a denial action by the <br />Commission would not stop the application process with DPW, and that another option for the <br />Commission would be to defer action with specific recommendations for the applicant to address in <br />their revised proposal. <br /> <br />It was moved by Commissioner Hetherington and seconded by Commissioner Ching that the <br />Commission defer action until the applicant can revise the proposal to address the Commission’s <br />recommendations as follows: <br /> <br /> Four Ground Signs: The number of signs be reduced to two; the signs be located at the <br />corners of proposed Road A and Road B; the size of the signs be reduced to 50 square feet <br />maximum with a maximum height of five feet; and the design be as presented on Sheet G-2. <br /> Anchor Building #4: The tower sign be reduced in size to ten square feet with the Safeway <br />logo approximately 3.5 feet in diameter; the Safeway logo on the front elevation be also <br />reduced in size to ten square feet, or approximately 3.5 feet in diameter, and the size of <br />Safeway name be reduced proportionate to the logo reduction; the applicant provide a <br />rendering with the correct background material; and the bright white color be modified to a <br />creamy white color or a warmer L.E.D. be used, and the applicant provide a nighttime <br />visualization sample. <br /> Gas Station Signage: The overall sign area of the canopy sign be reduced to no longer <br />require a variance; but that the font and icon size be allowed a variance to match the existing <br />variance approved for the Lanihau Center. <br /> Typical Tenant Wall ID Signs: The applicant submit a font type and color palette that the <br />Commission can approve for the signs of future tenants. <br /> <br />There being no discussion on the motion, a roll call vote was taken and motion carried with six ayes <br />(Hetherington, Ching, Crusat, Ikeuchi, Kern and Sullenberger), no noes, and one absent and <br />excused (Dahlberg). Commissioner Van Pernis abstained. <br /> <br />Note: Ms. Schatz and Mr. Vierra requested to be excused at 7:25 p.m. in order to catch their return <br />flight. Although they left the meeting prior to the conclusion of discussion and the subsequent <br />8 <br /> <br />