My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-02-14 (draft) Cost of Government Commission minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2018-2019
>
2019-02-14 (draft) Cost of Government Commission minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2019 3:18:27 PM
Creation date
3/13/2019 3:18:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cost of Government Commission <br />February 14, 2019 meeting minutes <br />st <br />(33:08): So, I think as of January 1 permits are now being accepted by DPW and not <br />by planning. The Department of Public Works is basically taking it back. <br /> <br />(33:26): Can you say that louder, I can’t hear you. <br /> <br />st <br />(33:28): Oh sorry, so as of January 1 I believe is what the date was that I saw on the <br />door of the planning department. The Department of Public Words, the building division <br />is now accepting permits so they used to accept them but then I think when Billy was in <br />office he decided to give it to planning and then I believe DPW wanted it back so now it <br />has been given back is what is my understanding. You might want to double check just <br />give them a call and see but I am pretty sure that is what I saw on the door as I walked <br />by so planning basically is just accepting the special permits. <br /> <br />(34:09): So a couple quick questions for you, does that mean DPW is now approving <br />permits <br /> <br />(34:15): Yeah, so basically it should all be running through them. <br /> <br />(34:20): Planning is then reviewing them also? <br /> <br />(34:23): I think they would just be commenting yes <br /> <br />(34:37): So many changes since we actually started this committee. So the first thing <br />that comes to mind is okay now there is another set of hands for this to go through <br />because you are still having to go through the planning department <br /> <br />(Crosstalk) <br /> <br />Jones: Is the goal though that DPW is going to reduce on those 2 people reduce the <br />load in terms of viewing and basic errors and taking it back before it even goes into <br />planning. That’s the thing the fact is there is no more people with a builder. It seems to <br />be a mystery (?) but it is a mystery, you don’t even know what is going on so I am <br />wondering if DPW will have a more concise and quicker response to the person <br />spinning the plans saying this isn’t going to fly, you know don’t bother to put it on to the <br />planning department. <br /> <br />(35:33): We will have to see but in all honesty with this group the only thing that we that <br />I can do is we can change the words a little bit to include department of public works. <br />But with this group we still have a serious problem with this is really about the planning <br />department really about permit approvals. We have a severe problem with permit <br />approvals and we have been reviewed nationally and we are not only the worst we are <br />the worst by many magnitudes across the United States we are number 1 the worst not <br />by you know 5% or 10% or 50% it is magnitudes of order <br /> <br />Ross: So we are missing out on business opportunities we are also missing out on <br />taxation because those buildings aren’t being built those taxes aren’t being paid <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.