Laserfiche WebLink
Upolu - Segment 4 <br />Property Information <br />1O TMK 560010260000, privately owned. Small parcel adjacent <br />to the Old Coast Guard Road, house on site. <br />O2 TMK 560010560000, federally owned property, related to <br />the antenna site. <br />O3 TMK 560010280000, privately owned, leased, in <br />agricultural. <br />O4 TMK 55050040000, privately owned, leased, agricultural. <br />There are two Grant of Easement Instruments 11-17659 on <br />10/26/2011 and 03-130627 in 6/26/2003 <br />O5 TMK 55005005000, privately owned, leased, agricultural. <br />Two Grant of Easement Instruments 11-17659 on <br />10/26/2011 and 3/24/2008 (same Instrument #) <br />O6 TMK 550050170000, privately owned, leased, agricultural <br />O7 TMK 550050100000, privately owned, leased, agricultural. <br />O8 TMK 550060030000, privately owned, agricultural, no <br />buildings. <br />O9 TMK 550060320000, privately owned, agricultural, building <br />present. RR ROW is a small sliver of land that is touched on <br />south side of the road. <br />10 TMK 550070400000, privately owned, agricultural <br />land, wind turbines. Grant of easement] 2/19/2017 (no <br />instrument number) <br />Y.> <br />Opportunities: <br />Within the Upolu Airport Property, there is a proposed 20 -foot wide <br />vehicular easement for public access, as well as a proposed parking <br />easement and coastal pedestrian trail for public access. This is not within <br />the RR ROW, but does provide a destination to the coast and access to <br />sites. Discussions have been on-going, and may need to be re-initiated <br />to ensure that there is action on this matter. <br />The State Na Ala Hele program abstractor has done a memorandum on <br />the Old Coast Guard Road, but it did not include certain parcels that do <br />appear to be in public access/Highways Act of 1892. The Coast Guard <br />Road is essential for vehicular access. <br />Pedestrian access from the RR ROW to the sites (Mo'okini Heiau area and <br />Kamehameha I birth site) exists, and this could be a destination with <br />interpretive opportunities. <br />The RR ROW is shown on a number of maps, through Bishop Estate <br />lands. <br />State DLNR Historic Preservation Division has documented the old RR <br />ROW as a feature to be preserved, and has provided direction to keep it <br />preserved. <br />There is agriculture and wind farms throughout this segment. This may <br />be seen as a compatible use and be supported, if the proposal and <br />protections of private property are put into place. <br />Location of the easement from old maps appears to be close to property <br />lines and existing roads or driveways. Alignment with these could make <br />placement of the trail easier. <br />Issues: <br />While there is a proposed easement (see above) for vehicles and parking, <br />there has been no action. In 2001, Surety Kohala and the County came <br />to an agreement which includes an agreement to grant a 20'wide <br />easement for vehicular access over the RR ROW from the Coast Guard <br />Road to the Mo'okini Heiau and the birth place of Kamehameha I. The <br />agreement also included vehicular access to the Mo'okini Heiau and <br />the birth site from the RR ROW, pedestrian access to the sea from the <br />Mo'okini Heiau and birth site, and reaffirmed public access along the <br />shoreline. However, this has not been executed. <br />Access to Mo'okini Area has been discussed, and there is a letter that <br />details concerns with the State, County, Kamehameha Schools (Bishop <br />Estate), Ms. Momi Lum, Mo'okini Foundation, Duane Kanuha, and Kohala <br />Preserve Conservation Trust LLC. The discussions are around access to <br />Mo'okini Heiau and Kamehameha I birth site. The State, through State <br />Parks, has management of the sites. There is a dispute between the <br />county, the state, and other parties on management, as the sites hold <br />very sensitive historic sites. Both can be reached via a dirt road, however, <br />access and improvements have not been resolved. <br />There is a need to sensitively manage the cultural and historic sites and <br />enhance protection and awareness. <br />Wind farms and agricultural use may have some push backs related to <br />safety. <br />