Laserfiche WebLink
CLARKSON: Amendment F? <br />HALL: I is next. <br />CLARKSON: Hmm? <br />HALL: I. <br />CLARKSON: Okay, now we're talking about amendment L F wasn't amended. Okay, is there <br />a motion for action on amendment I? <br />IKEDA: Move to approve Condition I as written. <br />DELA CRUZ: Second. <br />CLARKSON: Okay, it's been moved and seconded. Is there any discussion? II'm concerned <br />about this. I think the changes that the Planning Director may approve is too vague. I think <br />there should be some limitation as to the number of lots, the square footage of commercial area, <br />the general location of streets, or something that ties down the changes to those that have been <br />approved by the Commission and the Council and relegates the approval power of the Director in <br />concert with the Applicant to items that don't substantially change the nature of the project, <br />because the way this is written to me, the Planning Director may approve changes made by the <br />Applicant to accommodate evolving land use concepts, cost, I'm just going to skip through, <br />okay, and do not change permitted land uses, overall densities, open space requirements, and <br />infrastructure requirements. Okay, I take that back. They do not change permitted land uses, <br />overall densities. Open space requirements, infrastructure requirements, and are not contrary to <br />the amended project district ordinance. Okay. I withdraw any objection I had, and I won't go <br />for an amendment. <br />JACKSON: All right then <br />CLARKSON: Any further discussion? Thank you. <br />JACKSON: Commissioner Ikeda? <br />IKEDA: Aye. <br />JACKSON: Commissioner Dela Cruz? <br />DELA CRUZ: Aye. <br />JACKSON: Commissioner Aguinaldo? <br />AGUINALDO: Aye. <br />EXHIBIT C <br />28 <br />