Laserfiche WebLink
Permit is appearing to be needed, but it's not, you know, it's not a convenience store. It's not a <br />restaurant. It's not it's not, it's not a cafe, and I think that's, I think that's a really, really big <br />thing to consider. <br />Also, the other big factor, I know I said this before, this is Puna, and Puna can be very <br />controversial. We have close to 250 signatures of support. We have two letters of opposition. <br />That's unprecedented in Puna. It really is. And, I think that's a testament to Mr. Quinn and his <br />family and his business here. So, I'm going to let Mr. Quinn speak his mind, and I can help fill <br />in anywhere I can. Mr. Quinn? <br />QUINN: Thank you folks very—yeah, thank you folks very much for having me back. We have <br />put great thought into the concern, concerns of this council, especially with regards to customer <br />safety and traffic safety. In 19 years of doing business in Pahoa, we have not had one liability <br />claim or traffic incident where we are presently located. We play, we pay close attention to our <br />customers and their needs. We do not advertise our business. No big grand openings. We rely <br />on word of mouth advertisement. We feel it is important to note that both the geographic and <br />demographic criteria of Puna is very specific. I do not believe big business will target this area <br />due to the nature of our small town. We want to thank the Planning Department and the <br />Department of Transportation for bringing to our attention the line of sight issue. <br />Also, there were two opposition letters. One of them expressed concern about hydroplaning. So, <br />what we had done is we had gone down to the Department of Transportation on Makaala <br />Street— <br />HALL: Please speak into the mic <br />QUINN: —and I spoke to a gentleman over there. He was very nice. He made a copy of the <br />book that the Department of Transportation uses as a guideline for the line of sight issue that the <br />Planning Department feels is not there. So, after getting the two copies in this book that the <br />Department of Transportation uses, he gave me two pages, and these two pages will express the <br />amount of feet that you need at a certain rate of speed. On the first sheet, travelling at 35 miles <br />an hour, and it is a 45 mile an hour zone, it would require 250 feet stopping sight. If you're <br />travelling at 45 miles per hour, you would require 360 stopping sight distance. On this other <br />sheet that came out of this—that the Department of Transportation uses, travelling at 35 miles <br />per hour, you would need 250 feet. Travelling at 45 miles per hour, you would need 360 feet <br />line of sight. What we had done is we had done a preliminary check with a licensed engineer <br />who came out to the parcel. To just do a preliminary line of sight distance, it cost us a $150. <br />The request of a hard copy put in writing could be furnished to you folks. That cost would be <br />$700. So, we paid the initial one hundred and fifty, and what he came up with is, the sight <br />distance towards Kalapana is 350 feet. We're short ten feet going right. If you were to look left <br />towards Kea`au, we have 465 feet. We surpass the requirements on this book by over a 150 feet, <br />I think it is. <br />What has to be done is the side of the road has to be maintained with the California grass. We <br />feel if that was maintained, and it's something we could do on a regular basis, we would be able <br />to acquire the extra ten feet to make that line of sight, and we can also furnish you with a hard <br />EXHIBIT D <br />6 <br />