My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-03-21 Leeward Exh B (Discussion on condition deadlines)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2019
>
2019-03-21 Leeward Exh B (Discussion on condition deadlines)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2019 8:32:26 AM
Creation date
4/19/2019 8:32:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
This is just one of many conditions within a permit, but again, this is normally the condition that <br />an applicant comes in for a time extension request. <br /> <br />The other condition relative to ordinances is this one, which, if they are not proposing to build <br />anything, if they are proposing to change the zoning from, let’s say, Agricultural to Residential <br />and they are creating a subdivision with no proposed development, then this would be the timing <br />condition: <br /> <br />“Final Subdivision Approval of the proposed subdivision shall be secured from the Planning <br />Director within five (5) years from the effective date of this ordinance.” <br /> <br />So those are typical timing conditions. <br /> <br />Now, the administrative time condition that’s normally added in a majority, if not all, of the <br />permits with a time factor, is this particular one. It says: <br /> <br />“An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the ordinance (or permit) <br />may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: <br />1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or <br />are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns, and that are not the result of <br />their fault or negligence.” <br /> <br />I would, in commenting on this particular aspect, I would say 90 percent approximately use the <br />economy as the reason for not being able to move forward. That’s normally. Other, there’s a <br />number of other reasons; health reasons is one that comes up on occasion, but normally it’s the <br />economy. That’s what we see. <br /> <br />Before I go forward on that, so, all of a sudden we are seeing a number of request for time <br />extensions coming to the Commissions and the Council, and so they are asking why are all these <br />time extension requests coming to the Commission and Council? It appears that at this time <br />these applicants, or owners, successors or assigns, are able to go forward with their projects. <br />Now, that may not be true in all cases, but all of a sudden we are seeing a number of time <br />extensions come before the Commissions and the Council. So that question has been asked. <br />They are able to secure loans or funding and they state that they are in the position to go forward. <br />So, No. 2: <br /> <br />“2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or the Zoning <br />Code.” <br /> <br />So we, when these administrative time extensions come in, we look and see if there has been any <br />change to the General Plan in the particular area or the Zoning Code, and then: <br /> <br />“3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the <br />granting of the change of zone (or the permit).” <br /> <br />6 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.