Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0986.900 2018-2020From: Sherilyn Wells Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:54 AM To: Council Testimony; Poindexter, Valerie; Chung, Aaron; Lee Loy, Sue; Kierkiewicz, Ashley; Kanealii-Kleinfelder, Matt; David, Maile; Villegas, Rebecca; Eoff, Karen; Richards, Tim Subject: Attachment to my - Sherilyn Wells - 7/22/20 Oral Testimony in Support of Resolution 678-20 re 5G Attachments: capturedagency_alster.pdf, SSRN-id2282014.pdf, DOC-357620A5.pdf, DOC-357620A6.pdf, DOC-357620A2.pdf, 02-02-2020-CHD-v.- FCC- Petition -for- Review- For-Public.pdf, City of Eugene v FCC.doc; List of Cities, towns, Councils and Countries that have Banned 5G - Smombie Gate _ 5G _ EMF.pdf, s41598-018-22271-3.pdf Sherilyn Wells Testimony in Support of Resolution 678-20 re 5G July 22, 2020 COUNTY CLERK MONTY OF HAWAF' I ARCE n%D. Time 8y Date JUL 2, 2 .2020 In considering testimony from CITA that quotes the FCC and the FDA (see quotes of page 2 of CITA testimony), I encourage you to look at the attached reviews by Harvard University's Edmund J. Safra Center for Ethics. The Harvard reviews identify the FCC's (and the FDA's) profound failure to uphold their primary responsibilities to the public, their domination by the very industries they were supposed to regulate in the public interest. Please consider those reports when reading FCC and FDA quotes in the CITA letter. Re the FCC: Captured Amy - How the Federal Communications Commission Is Dominated Icy The Industries It Presumably Re a lates by Norm Alster (attached) Re the FDA: Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugas by Donald W. Light, Joel Lexchin, and Jonathan J. Darr (attached) ' �; I' 4• Y ♦ , ., e � , � �',- � � �a � 7 � `e a � � i it � � jj CITA's comments ignore the overwhelming amount of scientific information in the International EMF Scientists Appeal: "The (more than 240) scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals." (see Scientific American blog on page 14) The official website, www.5gaappeal.eu, for the 5G Appeal has been launched. The website contains the text of the Appeal, the current list of signatories, an explanation of 5G, and related news stories. The Appeal asserts that, "5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF -EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G; 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already in place. RF - EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment." Comm. NoS.,_(M i Ref.To: �-- Ref. t#al 2 More than 200 scientists and doctors from 38 nations have signed the declaration calling for a moratorium on the deployment of 5G (fifth generation) cellular technology. � S �: �' i'. j, M� t�j r t•` if. s Y 1� `� 'r ?,,.� � .�; .��t .� .� � ,, ! 4t ��s � y F ,�� 4�a a 1(c. G €, t Y Ei i' i �; L:,;1.1110110 Re the FCC's failure to update the health and safety regulations it adopted in 1996: the federal Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report in AUGUST 2012 that explicitly stated the FCC "should formally reassess and, if appropriate, change its current RF energy exposure limit and mobile phone tested requirements ... " The GAO report continued: "The [FCC's] RF energy exposure limit may not reflect the latest research, and testing requirement -s.- m-aynot identify maximum exposure in all possible usage conditions ... By not formally rea'ssessihg if's Ukr'&nt limit FCC cannot ensure it is using a limit that reflects the latest i al research on RF energy exposure..,;F�CC has also not reassessed its testing requirements to ensure that they identify ther,maxmum, RF energy exposure a user could experience." Congressman Pete DeFazio then wrote: "While I was pleased to see the FCC seek comments in 2013 on whether its RF safety guidelines should be reassessed, it is unacceptable that six (note added - now EIGHT) years later the FCC still has not conducted a reassessment of its 1996 guidelines." LAWSUITS AGAINST :FCC UNDERWAY - (1) CLASS ACTION BY MUNICIPALITIES & (2) C.1-1.I:LDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ET AL v. FCC ET AL That failure by the FCC to update its TWENTY-FOUR (24) YEAR OLD health and safety guidelines is the basis of one federal lawsuit against the FCC, a copy of which I provided during my testimony to the Commitee and which is attached to this email. Another active (large class action) lawsuit by various municipalities is underway against the FCC (attached). I encourage the Hawaii County Council to follow this lawsuit (and to seek intervention if appropriate), as it almost certainly contains arguments and issues relevant to Hawaii: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket for Case #: 19-70344 City of Eugene, Oregon, et al v. FCC, et al https://www.bloombertllaw.com/public/desktop/document/CityofEui!eneOre2onetalvFCCetalDo cketNo l9703449thCirFeb082019Court? 1595410524 INVESTIGATE SUCCESSFUL STRA.T:E:GIES EMPLOYED BY OTHER U.S. MUNICIPALITIES Refer to the List of Cities, towns, Councils and Countries that have Banned SG (attached) that I also provided to the Planning Committee during its hearing on this issue. There are some very creative ways of working within federal limits and still successfully holding off rollout of 5G, pending production. of the,,,w ss,ing/updated health and safety studies and the resolution of the federal lawsuits. .osa+aema5�es:mc¢+'r��HBumars�Ot.4'" https://smombie ag te.org/list-of-cities-towns-councils-and-countries-that-have-banned-5a As you review the various plant and animal studies below, please note that it is critical to acknowledge actual environmental conditions, in which CUMULATIVE, ADDITIVE, and SYNERGISTIC effects can amplify/increase the narrower results reported below, significant though they are. Given recent challenges to the Hawaiian ecosystem (Rapid Death of Ohia, etc.), the extinction or near extinction of other indigenous plant, avian, and animal species, giving Hawaii the dubious distinction of being The Endangered Species Capitol Of The World ( https:Holukai.com/blogs/news/hawaii-the- endan2ered-species-capital-of-the-world ), we must exert all necessary caution and implement proactive/protective measures to ensure that further damage to our rare and precious ecosystem does not take place, especially when proliferation of EMF technology could be the death knell for broad swaths of struggling, irreplaceable plant and animal/insect species. Hawaii: The Endangered Species Capitol Of The World The Hawaiian Islands, blessed with outstanding biodiversity and an ecosystem composed of hundreds of endangered species, is the most isolated landmass in the world. Many evolved species are unique to the island chain. Scientists and environmental activists often refer to Hawaii as the "Endangered Species Capital of the World." Koa played an in role in ancient Hawaiian culture and today is valued for its magnificent grain., strength and beauty. The giant straight trees were the source for logs to carve voyaging canoes; An assemblage of these Koa crafted canoes became the Polynesian Fleet that navigated the Pacific more than a thousand years before Columbus set sail to discover the new world. Known as the "King of the Forest," the magnificent Koa tree produces one of the world's finest tropical hardwoods. However, western methods of harvesting have devastated more than 90 percent of the spectacular stands of Koa trees that once blanketed the island chain. This valuable resource was eradicated from lower elevations, destroying the genetic diversity that once existed. Throughout the Hawaiian island chain, Koa forests have been decimated to near- extinction; harvested for the valuable wood and to make way for cattle ranches and sugar plantations. Today, less than ten percent of Hawaii's old-growth forests remain. �? � � j � 1 �, � u ,,r � �%�r 4 ii ♦':, ,�r F F��1 !, 'v,,� s :': � ■, c � . � ♦' ii '£ P t. "Exposure of Insects to Radio -Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from 2 to 120 GHz" published in .,Veienti fic Reports (attached) (2 GHz to 120 GHz) to be used in the 4G/5G rollout. The scientific simulations showed increases in absorbed power between 3% to 370% when the insects were exposed to the frequencies. Researchers concluded, "This could lead to changes in insect behaviour, physiology, and morphology over time...." (Thielens et al., 2018) HIGH-LEVEL DAMAGE IN TREES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF PHONE MASTS - SEE PHOTOSIN "SIX YEAR STUDY" BELO-W 3 Hum n health isn't the only concern. In a study published in Science of the Total Environment, researchers found: High-level damage in trees within the vicinity of phone masts. We found out that from the damaged side there was always visual contact to one or more phone mast(s). Statistical analyses demonstrated that the electromagnetic radiation from cellphone towers is harmful to trees. Results show that the measurements in the most affected sides of damaged trees (i.e. those that withstand higher radiation levels) are different to all other groups. These results are consistent with the fact that damage inflicted on trees by cellphone towers, usti.ally start on one side, extending to the whole tree over time. This constitutes a danger for trees worldwide. The further deployment of phone masts has to be stopped. Scientific research on trees under the real radio-frequency field conditions must continue. The study lasted for 9 years and used more than 100 trees. The field monitoring part of the study was performed in Bamberg and Hallstadt (Germany). Observations and photographic recordings of unusual or unexplainable tree damage were taken along with the measurement of electromagnetic radiation. In 2015 measurements of RF -EMF (Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields) were carried out. A polygon spanning both cities was chosen as the study site, where 144 measurements of the radiofrequency of electromagnetic fields were taken at a height of 1.5 m in streets and parks at different locations. By interpolation of the 144 measurement points, we were able to compile an electromagnetic map of the power flux density in Bamberg and Hallstadt. We selected 60 damaged trees, in addition to 30 randomly selected trees and 30 trees in low radiation areas (n = 120) in this polygon. The measurements of all trees revealed significant differences between the damaged side facing a phone mast and the opposite side, as well as differences between the exposed side of damaged trees and all other groups of trees in both sides. Thus, we found that side differences in measured values of power flux density corresponded to side differences in damage. The 30 selected trees in low radiation areas (no visual contact to any phone mast and power flux density under 50 µW/m2 ) showed no damage. Statistical analysis demonstrated that electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone masts is harmful for trees. These results are consistent with the fact that damage afflicted on trees by mobile phone towers usually start on one side, extending to the whole tree over time. What's also interesting is that the study points out that natural forms of electromagnetic radiation are not the same and do not have the same impact as unnatural sources of radiation do on plant life. Several researchers have pointed out how this topic has received little attention and these physiological effects are being considered negligible. The study also concludes that most studies that have addressed the effects of microwaves on animals and pants have documented effects and res, onses at ex osures below limits specified in the electromagnetic radiation exposure guidelines and it is therefore necessary to rethink these guidelines. Since 2005, on the occasion of medical examinations of sick residents living near mobile phone base stations, changes in nearby trees (crown, leaves, trunk, branches, growth...) were observed at the same time as clinical symptoms in humans occurred. Since 2006 tree damages in the radiation field of mobile phone base stations were documented. Trees that were in the radio shadow of buildings or of other trees remained healthy, because, the researchers hypothesized, they were protected from the radiation. The research on EMF's and their environmental impact is quite limited, and studies on humans show that this type of radiation affects biological organisms, especially humans. For example, a paper published in 2018 in Environmental Research titled "Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health" points out that. "Repeated WI-Fi studies show that Wi-Fi causes oxidative stress, sperm/testicular damage, neuropsychiatric effects including EEG changes, apoptosis, cellular DNA damage, endocrine changes, and calcium overload." When it comes to 5G, a study published in 2019 in Frontiers in Public Health is one of many that raises concerns about 5G technology. It points out that "novel 5G technology is being rolled out in several densely populated cities, although potential chronic health or environmental impacts have not been evaluated at -Rd are not being followed." It goes on to emphasize that the range and magnitude of potential impacts of 5G technologies are under -researched, although important biological outcomes have been reported with millimeter wavelength exposure. These include oxidative stress and altered gene expression, effects on skin and systemic effects such as on immune function. In vivo studies reporting resonance with human sweat ducts, acceleration of bacterial and viral replication, and other endpoints indicate the potential for novel as well as more commonly recognized biological impacts from this range of frequencies, and highlight the need for research before population -wide continuous exposures." (Does this) Six year study proves wireless kills trees? • Health Freedom Idaho • August 2, 2017 R k,.ai.✓/.d:7u;:����!'�W.SIN!�id+�1�i�57i+mM1':d�d��N:FY�5u"Po'ei%'i&Yli(m0'�:�I�M'MlG�7N:td L'�Ilidf.�(��ia�l��i�r�YW.ld9'L®I� :.v. ..w,,,u.:....�...,,s.........:.....::c.:»....w...:....t.....:.vaa.treuvv�vowur�eJ��uu We LL v deveLoped tree crown -in the city NO '.F 'transmitter In the Line of sight: "WO Norway mqpte tree, August 20 Badly damaged tree crown on facingtronsmitter Wireless Kills Trees. A six-year study of trees around wireless cell towers reveals the `invisible' damage of exposure to RF radiation. Radiation from wireless technology is now jeopardizing the health of our trees and other plants. "Tree damage in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations" by Waldmann- Selsam and Egar in 2013, documented suspected RF radiation related tree damage and RF radiation readings over a period of six years. It found significantly higher RF radiation readings by damaged trees as compared to undamaged trees. Sometimes damaged areas and undamaged areas were on the same tree, in which case RF radiation levels were found to be higher near the damaged areas. Because trees are unable to move, differences in RF radiation levels from fixed sources like cell towers can result in very different RF radiation exposure micro -environments in different parts of the same tree or bush. Researchers state "More recently, it has been shown that mortality rates of all dominant tree species in the western United States have been doubling every 17-29 years in old growth forests, and that recruitment of new trees is now occurring at a lower rate than mortality." The aspen experiment combined with other measurement and observational studies make a compelling case that our addiction to wireless technology is killing the trees we need so much for life far faster than they can replace themselves. In the Netherlands, because of the increased use if Wi-Fi over the last few years, a whopping 70% of urban trees are suffering from radiation poisoning, up from only 10% five years ago. Most people don't really stop to consider how their cell phone or other wireless devices work. They' -re just "magic" and "neat" and "convenient." If they do think about it, common perception includes these erroneous assumptions: direct communication from device to base station similar to an invisible wire or a homogeneous RF field put out by devices and towers. Neither of these are true. The RF fields put out by both devices and towers are not exclusively direct from device to tower. Nor are the RF fields homogeneous. There are areas of high RF concentration immediately adjacent to areas that are much lower. The exact nature of the fields depends on the transmitter configuration and use at the time. Hence, when you snake a call on a cell phone or download a video on WiFi, the RF radiation (specifically, microwave radiation) used by the wireless devices goes through you and everyone around you. Which person, tree, or other creature is exposed to the most RF radiation will depend on the device, your surroundings, and the base station transmitter location. Trees cannot move when they start to "feel bad" and show signs of damage. Tree give us oxygen and clear our air. Their health is declining visibly due to exposure. Testing results from the Eagle High School property as reported by Lisa Doyon: maps, results and detailed research can he found at EagleHealin , com The radiation from cell phones, towers, WI -FI, cordless technology is all the same microwave energy just at different frequencies and levels. But the effects are the same. After the school hoard approved a cell tower at the local high school where my daughter attends, I rented a meter to see for myself if there was indeed radiation outside and/or inside the school. The results were shocking even to me. As much as 66,700% higher levels of radiation measured in classrooms facing the tower than what has been shown to cause biological effects on us. ... most all of its have unknowingly turned our homes into microwave ovens. The power level, though, is at a much lower level than your cooking microwave, so it's just cooking you much slower, but is cooking you nevertheless. Click here to go right to the tower measurements. Click here to go right to the WI-FI/device measurements. Halgamuge, M.N. "Weak radiofrequency radiation exposure from mobile phone radiation on plants." Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, vol. 36, no. 2, 2017, pp. 213-235. "Our analysis demonstrates that the data from a substantial amount of the studies on :1 'F-'EM:Fs from mobile phones shove physiological and/or morphological effects (89.9%, p < 0.001). Additionally, our analysis of the results from these reported studies demonstrates that the maize, roselle, pea, fenugreek; duckweeds, tomato, onions and mungbean plants seem to be very sensitive to RF-EMFs. Our findings also suggest that plants seem to be more responsive to certain frequencies..." Waldmann-Selsam, C., et al. "Radiofrequency radiation injures trees around mobile phone base stations." Science of the Total Environment, vol. 572, 2016, pp. 554-69. Gustavino, B., et al. "Exposure to 915 MHz radiation induces micronuclei in Vicia faba root tips." Mutagenesis, vol. 31, no. 2, 2016, pp. 187-92. The increasing use of mobile phones and wireless networks raised a great debate about the real carcinogenic potential of radiofrequency -electromagnetic field (RF -EMF) exposure associated with these devices. Conflicting results are reported by the great majority of in vivo and in vitro studies on the capability of RF -EMF exposure to induce DNA damage and mutations in mammalian systems. Aimed at understanding whether less ambiguous responses to RF -EMF exposure might be evidenced in plant systems with respect to mammalian ones, in the present work the mutagenic effect of RF -EMF has been studied through the micronucleus (MN) test in secondary roots of Vicia faba seedlings exposed to mobile phone transmission in controlled conditions, inside a transverse electro magnetic (TEM) cell. Exposure of roots was carried out for 72h using a continuous wave (CW) of 915 MHz radiation at three values of equivalent plane wave power densities (23, 35 and 46W/m2). The specific absorption rate (SAR) was measured with a calorimetric method and the corresponding values were found to fall in the range of 0.4-1.5W/kg. Results of three independent experiments show the induction of a significant increase of MN frequency after exposure, ranging from a 2.3 -fold increase above the sham value, at the lowest SAR level, up to a 7 -fold increase at the highest SAR. These findings are in agreement with the limited number of data on cytogenetic effects detected in other plant systems exposed to mobile phone .:F -'EMF frequencies and clearly show the capability of radiofrequency exposure to induce SNA damage in this eukaryotic cell system. It is worth noticing that this range of SAR values is well below the international limits for localised exposure (head, trunk), according to the ICNIRP guidelines (35) and IEEE std C95.1 (38), which are 10 (8.0) W/kg for occupational exposure and 2.0 (1.6) W/kg for general public exposure respectively_ Halgamuge, Malka N., See Kye Yak and Jacob L. Eberhardt. "Reduced growth of soybean seedlings after exposure to weak microwave radiation from GSM 900 mobile phone and base station." Bioelectronzagnetics, vol. 36, no. 2, 2015, pp. 87-95. The aim of this work was to study possible effects of environmental radiation pollution on plants. The association between cellular telephone (short duration, higher amplitude) and base station (long duration, very low amplitude) radiation exposure and the growth rate of soybean (Glycine max) seedlings was investigated. The exposure to higher amplitude (41 V m-1) GSM radiation resulted in diminished outgrowth of the epicotyl. The exposure to lower amplitude (5.7 V m-1) GSM radiation did not influence outgrowth of epicotyl, hypocotyls, or roots. The exposure to higher amplitude CW radiation resulted in reduced outgrowth of the roots whereas lower CW exposure resulted in a reduced outgrowth of the hypocotyl. Soybean seedlings were also exposed for 5 days to an extremely low level of radiation (GSM 900 MHz, 0.56 V m-1) and outgrowth was studied 2 days later. Growth of epicotyl and hypocotyl was found to be reduced, whereas the outgrowth of roots was stimulated. Our findings indicate that the observed effects were significantly dependent on field strength as well as amplitude modulation of the applied field. Senavirathna, M.D., et al. "Nanometer -scale elongation rate fluctuations in the Myriophyllum aquaticum (Parrot feather) stem were altered by radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation." Plant. Signal. Behav, vol. 9, no. 3, 2014. Statistically significant changes to this plant from a non thermal effect. Soran, M.L., et al. "Influence of microwave frequency electromagnetic radiation on terpene emission and content in aromatic plants.'' Journal. of Plant Physiology, vol. 171, no. 15, 2014, pp. 1436-43. Haggerty, Katie. "Adverse Influence of Radio Frequency Background on Trembling -,Aspen Seedlings" International Journal of Forestry Research, vol 2010, no. 836278, 2010. "This study suggests that the RF background may have strong adverse effects on growth rete and fall anthocyanin. production in aspen, and may be an underlying factor in aspen decline." Read more at our webpage on peer reviewed science on the environment https://ehtlust.org/science/bees- butterflies-wildlife-research-electromagnetic-fields-environment/ This article originally appeared at: https://ehtrust.orR/tree-damage-caused-mobile-phone-base-stations- o b s ervation- guide-hellnut-breuni g/ RESOURCE: Photos and RF measurements by Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam Additional photos by Alfonso Balmori, Helmut Breunig, Orjan Hallberg, Volker Schorpp and Monika Schuberth-Brehm This documentation can be found online at Kompetenzinitiative.net. We have posted the peer-reviewed research that shows that cell tower mobile phone base station radiation damages trees below this document. Note the published article by Waldmann-Selsam, C., et al. "Radiofrequency radiation injures trees around mobile phone base stations." Science of the Total Environment, vol. 572, 2016, pp. 554-69. 2017 Observation Guide ENG FINAL RED Blog from Scientific American - citing the INTERNATIONAL EMF SCIENTIST APPEAL - https://blo2s.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/ We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe The technology is coming, but contrary to what some people say, there could be health risks By Joel M. Moskowitz on October 17, 2019 Credit: Bill Oxford Getty Imams The telecommunications industry and their experts have accused many scientists who have researched the effects of cell phone radiation of "fear mongering" over the advent of wireless technology's 5G. Since much of our research is publicly -funded, we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation. The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a press release that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 1990s. These limits are based upon a behavioral change in rats exposed to microwave radiation and were designed to protect us from short-term heating risks due to RFR exposure. Yet, since the .SCC adopted these limits based largely on research from the 1980s, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research, more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects front exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating. Citing this large body of research, more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger exposure limits. The appeal makes the following assertions: "Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to bot ark an animal life." The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals. The FCC's RFR exposure limits regulate the intensity of exposure, taking into account the frequency of the carrier waves, but ignore the signaling properties of the RFR. Along with the patterning and duration of exposures, certain characteristics of the signal (e.g., pulsing, polarization)increase the biologic and health 10 impacts of the exposure_ . New exposure limits are needed which account for these differential effects. Moreover, these limits should be based on a biological effect, not a change in a laboratory rat's behavior. The World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified RFR as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" in 2011. Last year, a $30 million study conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) found "clear evidence" that two years of exposure to cell phone RFR increased cancer in reale rats and damaged DNA in rats and mice of both sexes. The Rarnazzini Institute in Italy replicated the key finding of the NTP using a different carrier frequency and much weaker exposure to cell phone radiation over the life of the rats. Based upon the research published since 2011, including human and animal studies and mechanistic data, the IARC has recently prioritized RFR to be reviewed again in the next five years. Since many EMF scientists believe we now have sufficient evidence to consider RFR as either a probable or known human carcinogen, the IARC will likely upgrade the carcinogenic potential of RFR in the near future. Nonetheless, without conducting a formal risk assessment or a systematic review of the research on RFR health effects, the FDA recently reaffirmed the FCC's 1996 exposure limits in a letter to the FCC, stating that the agency had "concluded that no changes to the current standards are warranted at this time," and that "NTP's experimental findings should not be applied to human cell phone usage." The letter stated that "the available scientific evidence to date does not support adverse health effects in humans due to exposures at or - under the current limits." The latest cellular technology, 5G, will employ millimeter waves for the first time in addition to microwaves that have been in use for older cellular technologies, 2G through 4G. Given limited reach, 5G will require cell 'witerrrras every 1.00 to 200 meters, exposing many people to millimeter wave radiation. 5G also employs new technologies (e.g., active antennas capable of beam -forming; phased arrays; massive multiple inputs and outputs, kriowrr as massive MIMO) which pose unique challenges for measuring exposures. Millimeter waves are mostly absorbed within a few millimeters of human skin and in the surface layers of the cornea. Short-term exposure can have adverse physiological effects in the peripheral nervous system, the immune system and the cardiovascular system. The research suggests that long-term exposure may pose health risks to the skin (e.g., melanoma), the eyes (e.g., ocular melanoma) and the testes (e.g., sterility). Since 5G is a new technology, there is no research on health effects, so we are "flying blind" to quote a U.S. senator. However, we have considerable evidence about the harmful effects of 2G and 3G. Little is known the effects of exposure to 4G, a 10 -year-old technology, because governments have been remiss in funding this research. Meanwhile, we are seeing increases in certain types of head and neck tumors in tumor registries, which may be at least partially attributable to the proliferation of cell phone radiation. These increases are consistent with results from case -control studies of tumor risk in heavy cell phone users. 5G will not replace 4G; it will accompany 4G for the near future and possibly over the long term. If there are synergistic effects from simultaneous exposures to multiple types of RER, our overall risk of harm from RFR may increase substantially. Cancer is not the only risk as there is considerable evidence that RFR causes neurological disorders and reproductive harm, likely due to oxidative stress. As a society, should we invest hundreds of billions of dollars deploying 5G, a cellular technology that requires the installation of 800,000 or more new cell antenna sites in the U.S. close to where we live, work and play? Instead, we should support the recommendations of the 250 scientists and medical doctors who signed the 5G Appeal that calls for an immediate moratorium on the deployment of 5G and demand that our 11 government fund the research needed to adopt biologically based exposure limits that protect our health and safety. ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S) Joel M. Moskowitz Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD, is director of the Center for Family and Community Health in the School of Public Health at the University of California, Berkeley. He has been translating and disseminating the research on wireless radiation health effects since 2009 after he and his colleagues published a review paper that found long-term cell phone users were at greater risk of brain tumors. His Electromagnetic Radiation Safety website has had more than two million page views since 2013. He is an unpaid advisor to the International EMF Scientist Appeal and Physicians for Safe Technology. Electromagnetic Radiation Safety - www.saferemr.com Scientific and policy developments regarding the health effects of electromagnetic radiation exposure from cell phones, cell towers, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters, and other wireless technology Tuesday, July 7, 2020 Recent Research on Wireless Radiation and Electromagnetic Fields I have been circulating abstracts of newly -published scientific papers on wireless radiation and electromagnetic fields (EMF) about once or twice a month since August 2016. These updates are sent to several hundred EMF scientists around the world. The latest additions appear below. The complete collection of abstracts now covers more than 900 scientific papers. This 681 -page document (pdf) can be downloaded by clicking on the following link: http s : //bit.ly/EMFJu ly07072 0 Note: This link will change when new abstracts are added to the collection. Wednesday, July 1, 2020 5G Wireless Technology: Is 5G Harmful to Our Health? See the bottom of this page (link) for additional resources: https://www.saferemr.conz/2017/09/5 - ivireless-technoloay-is-5e-harm ficl--to. html 12 5G Research from the EMF -Portal Archive As of June 1, 2020, the EMF -Portal archive listed 133 papers and letters to the editor published in professional journals and presentations at professional conferences that focus on 5G research. Although most discuss technical or dosimetric issues (n = 92), 41 citations address other issues including potential biologic: or health effects. In all, the EMF -Portal archive references more than 30,000 publications and presentations on non -ionizing electromagnetic fields. The Portal is a project based at the University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany. Currently, no peer-reviewed, empirical studies of the biologic or health effects from exposure to 5G radiation have been published. Fence, those who claim that 5G is safe because it complies with radiofrequency exposure guidelines are engaging in sophistry. These guidelines were designed to protect the population from short-term heating (or thermal) risks. However, numerous peer-reviewed studies have found adverse biologic and health effects from exposure to low -intensity or non -thermal levels of electromagnetic fields (EMF). Hence, more than 240 EMF scientists who have signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal have recommended that "guidelines and regulatory standards be strengthened": "Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines.... The various agencies setting safety standards have failed to impose sufficient guidelines to protect the general public, particularly children who are more vulnerable to the effects of EMF." To download the list of 133 papers and presentations: bit.ly/EmfPortal5G Related Posts Have No Reason io, Believe 5G is Safe" Scientific American Scientific American Created Confusion about 5G's Safety: Will They Clear It Up? (includes "5G, Public Health and Uncomfortable Truths") 13 Scientists and Doctors Demand Moratorium on 5G Wireless Technology: Millimeter Wave Health Effects 5G Wireless Technology: Cutting through the Hype 5C Wireiess Technology: News)a�er editorials oppose "small cell" antenna hills ICNIRP's Exposure Guidelines for Radio Frequency Fields Worldwide Radio Frequency Radiation Exposure Limits versus Health Effects ." ill ' 'ac wer Health Effects ,Electrmn,a netic Hy ersensitivity EHSj Physicians for Safe Technology Environmental Health Trust Consequences of Electromagnetic Field Radiation During Early Pregnancy - Androgen Synthesis and Release From the Myometrium of Figs in Vitro Anita Franczak, Ewa M Waszkiewicz, Wiktoria Kozlowska, Agata Zmij ewska, Anna Koziorowska. Consequences of Electromagnetic Field Radiation During Early Pregnancy - Androgen Synthesis and Release From the Myometrium of Pigs in Vitro. Animal Reproduction Science. Vol. 218, July 2020, 106465. littps://doi.org/10.1016/ .aa_anireprosci.2020.106465 Highlights EMF radiation causes alterations in myometrial androgens synthesis and release. The consequences of EMF mainly depend on the frequency and duration of EMF exposure. The presence of P4 does not protect from EMF during the peri-iinplantation period. Abstract An electromagnetic field (EMF) has been found to affect reproductive processes in females. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of low, non -ionizing EMF radiation on the steroidogenic activity of myometrium collected from pigs during the fetal peri -implantation period. Myometrial slices were treated with an EMF (50 and 120 Hz, 2 and 4 h of incubation) and examined for the aromatase cytochrome P450 17(x-hydroxylase/C17-201yase (CYP17A1) and 30 -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/A5-04 isomerase (I 1SD3 B 1) mRNA transcript abundance, cytochrome P450c 17 and 3 PHSD protein abundance and the secretion of androstenedione (A4) and testosterone (T). To determine whether progesterone (P4) functions as a protectant from EMF radiation, the selected slices were treated with P4. In slices incubated without P4, EMF at 50 Hz altered cytochrome P450c 17 protein abundance (4 h), HSD3131 mRNA transcript abundance (4 h) and A4 release (2 h) as well as T release (2 h) in P4 -treated slices. The EMF at 120 Hz in non P4- 14 treated slices altered A4 release (2 and 4 h) whereas in P4 -treated slices altered CYP17A1 mRNA transcript abundance (4 h), 30HSD protein abundance (4 h), A4 (4 h) and T release (2 h). In conclusion, EMF radiation in the myometrium collected during the peri -implantation period alters the CYP17A1 and HSD3131 mRNA transcript and encoded protein abundance, and androgen release due to the time of treatment and P4 presence or absence. The P4 did not function directly as an obvious protector against EMF radiation in the myometrium of pigs during the fetal peri -implantation period. https://pLibmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32507253/ The Effects of Prenatal Radiation of Mobile Phones on White Matter in Cerebellum of Rat Offspring Mei-Li Yang, Shan-Yan Hong, Hong -Hong Huang, Guo-Rong Lyu, Ling -Xing Wang. [The Effects of Prenatal Radiation of an Phones on White Matter in Cerebellum of Rat Offspring] [Article in Chinese]. Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Jan 28;36(1):77-81. DOI: 10.12047/j.cjap.5880.2020.017. Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effects of prenatal radiation of 850 -1,900 MHz mobile phone on white mattes- in cerebellum of adult rat offspring. Methods: Pregnant rats were randomly divided into short term maternal radiation group, long term maternal radiation group and control group. Rats in short term and long term maternal radiation group were exposed to 6 h/d and 24 h/d mobile phone radiation during 1-17 days of pregnancy, respectively. The cerebellums of offspring rats at the age of 3 month (n=8) were taken. Cell morphology in cerebellum was studied by . heinatoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. The expressions of myelin basic protein (MBP), neurofilament -L (NF -L) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in cerebellum of rat offspring were detected by immunohistochemistry and Western blot. Results: Compared to control group, the morphological changes of purkinje cells in cerebellum were obvious in rat offspring of short term and long term maternal radiation group. Compared to control group, decreased MBP and NF -L expressions and increased GFAP expression were observed in long term maternal radiation group(all P<0.05). Compared to short term radiation group, the expressions of MBP and NF -L were down -regulated (all P<0.05) and the expression of GFAP was up- regulated(P <0.05) in long term radiation group. Conclusion: Prenatal mobile phone radiation might lead to the damage of myelin and axon with activity of astrocytes in cerebellum of finale rat offspring, which is related to the extent of radiation. https://pubmed.nebi.nlm.nih.gov/32476377/ 15 Enriched Environment Decreases Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Rats With Prenatal Mobile Phone Exposure Shanyan Hong, Honghong Huang, Meili Yang, Haining Wu, Lingxing Wang. Enriched Environment Decreases Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Rats With Prenatal Mobile Phone Exposure. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 Jun 4;12:162. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00162. Abstract Mobile phone use has rapidly increased worldwide, and pregnant women are passively or actively exposed to the associated electromagnetic radiation. Maternal cell phone exposure is related to behavioral difficulties in young offspring. However, whether prenatal mobile phone exposure can predispose the elderly offspring to cognitive impairment is unclear. The enriched environment (EE) has shown positive effects on cognition in an immature brain, but its impact on aging offspring after prenatal cell phone exposure is unknown. This study aimed to investigate whether prenatal exposure to mobile phone exerts long-term effects on cognition in elderly rat offspring and whether EE during adulthood can rescue cognitive impairment by altering the synaptic plasticity. Pregnant ratswere subjected to prenatal short-term or long-term cell phone exposure and off spring rats were randomly assigned to standard or EE. Spatial learning and memory were investigated using Morris water maze (MWM) in elderly rat offspring. Hippocampal cellular morphology was assessed by hematoxylin-eosin staining and synaptic ultrastructure was evaluated with transmission electron microscopy. Expression of synaptophysin (SYN), postsynaptic density -95 (PSD -95), and brain -derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were detected by western blot. The results demonstrated that prenatal long- term but not short-term exposure to mobile phone lead to cognitive impairment, morphological changes in the hippocampal cells, reduced synaptic number, decreased SYN, PSD -95, and BDNF expression in elderly offspring, which were alleviated by postnatal EE housing. These findings suggest that prenatal long-term mobile phone exposure may pose life-long adverse effects on elderly offspring and impair cognition by disrupting the synaptic plasticity, which may be reversed by postnatal EE housing. Open access paper: https://www.frontiersin.orR/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00162/full Also see: Pregnancy & Wireless Radiation Risks Absorption of 5G radiation in brain tissue as a function of frequency, power and time David H. Gultekin, Peter H. Siegel. Absorption of 5G radiation in brain tissue as a function of frequency, power and time. IEEE Access. Published online June 12, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002183. 16 Abstract The rapid release of 5G wireless communications networks has spurred renewed concerns regarding the interactions of higher radiofrequency (RF) radiation with living species. We examine RF exposure and absorption in ex vivo bovine brain tissue and a brain simulating gel at three frequencies: 1.9 GHz, 4 GHz and 39 GHz that are relevant to current (4G), and upcoming (5G) spectra. We introduce a highly sensitive thermal method for the assessment of radiation exposure, and derive experimentally; accurate relations between the temperature rise (AT), specific absorption rate (SAR) and the incident power density (F), and tabulate the coefficients, AT/AF and A(SAR)/AF, as a function of frequency, depth and time. This new method provides both AT and SAR applicable to the frequency range below and above 6 GHz as shown at 1..9, 4 and 39 GHz, and demonstrates the most sensitive experimental assessment of brain tissue exposure to millimeter -wave radiation to date, with a detection limit of 1 mW. We examine the beam penetration, absorption and'thermal diffusion at representative 4G and 5G frequencies and show that the RF heating increases rapidly with frequency due to decreasing RF source wavelength and increasing power density with the same incident power and exposure time. We also show the temperature effects of continuous wave, rapid pulse sequences and single pulses with varying pulse duration, and we employ electromagnetic modeling to map the field distributions in the tissue. Finally, using this new methodology, we measure the thermal diffusivity of ex vivo bovine brain tissue experimentally. Summary In this paper, we present for the first time, a simple, highly accurate test system for measuring the temperature rise and the specific absorption rate in tissue samples and liquid or gel simulants as a function of frequency, RF exposure power and time — pulsed and CW. We use this set up to make, and compare, carefillly calibrated measurements of bovine brain tissue and a gel simulant, Triton X and water, at both 4G (1.9 GHz) and newly allocated 5G frequency bands (4 GHz - 39 GHz). We show the effects of beam concentration, focusing, absorption and heat diffusion at all three frequencies and delineate a linear range over which we can derive highly accurate coefficients (AT/AF and A(SAR)/AF) that can be used to predict the temperature rise and the specific absorption rate at prescribed depths and exposure times within the tissue or gel at power levels that go down to detectable limits (<1 mW). This method may be used to evaluate a wide range of RF radiation sources, tissues and simulants. We also note that the impact of relatively modest incident RF power (1 W) and short exposure times (6 minutes CW and 30 second pulsed) at 39 GHz using a single mode waveguide source for the exposure, results in extremely large power density (16.5 kW/m2) and temperature rise (> 60°C for CW, > 35°C for 30 s pulse) in both bovine brain tissue and gel. This same temperature rise can be expected on skin (which has very similar dielectric properties) when such large surface power densities are present in very close proximity to the RF source or antenna, perhaps emanating from millimeter -wave base stations, handsets, or wireless -enabled appliances or kiosks. Although, current safety limits of 28.76 and 143.8 W/m2 for power density in unrestricted (public) and restricted (occupational) environments, respectively should prevent such exposures, the resulting limits on RF power generation of only 1.7 to 8.5 mW from a 17 directional RF source, such as our waveguide at 39 GHz, in the vicinity, will greatly limit the application potential for any such communications system. In the USA, the FCC and FDA are overseeing the implementation of millimeter wave technology in the - public realm and more studies are needed to help guide the science, technology and policy. Our experimental method can provide threshold temperature and SAR values for both occupational and public exposures to millimeter waves with surface power densities from 16.5 W/m2 to 16.5 kW/m2 and exposure times from 1 second to 30 minutes. Finally, we use our new data and this RF method to derive a thermal diffusivity coefficient for the ex vivo bovine brain tissue that is consistent with our prior measurements using an MRI. This is the first time that the thermal diffusivity of ex vivo bovine brain tissue has been directly measured by this thermal RF method [47, 50, 51, 70]. Open access paper: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9115853 Central nervous system lymphoma and radiofrequency radiation — a case report and incidence data in the Swedish Cancer Register on non-Hodgkin lymphoma Lennart Hardell, Michael Carlberg, Tarmo Koppel, Marie Nordstrom, Lena K Hedendahl. Central nervous system lyinphorma and radiofrequency radiation — a case report and incidence data in the Swedish Cancer Register on non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Medical Hypotheses. Available online 29 June 2020, 110052. https://doi.org/10.1016/'.r� nehy.2020.110052 Abstract .Earlier animal studies have provided evidence that non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may be caused by exposure to radiofrequency ( ) radiation. This was recently confirmed by the U.S. National Toxicology (NTP) study that showed an increased incidence of malignant lymphoma in female mice exposed to the GSM modulated or the CDMA modulated cell phone RF radiation. Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare malignancy in humans with poor prognosis. An increasing incidence has been reported in recent years. Based on a case -report we present the hypothesis that use of the hand-held mobile phone may be a risk factor for PCNSL. The increasing incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Sweden is discussed in relation to etiologic factors. https://www.sciencedirect.corn/science/articlelpiilSO306987720309567?via%3Dihub 18 Electric Field and SAR Distribution in the Vicinity of Orthodontic Brace .Ex osed to the Cell phone Radiation Jovanovic DB, Krasic DD, Stankovic VB, Cvetkovic, NN, Vuckovic DD. Electric Field and SAR Distribution in the Vicinity of Orthodontic Brace Exposed to the Cell Phone Radiation. Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal 34(12):1904-1914. Dec 2019. Abstract The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of orthodontic brace on the electric field distribution and amount of the absorbed energy from the cell phone within the teeth. A comparative analysis of the models (child and adult) with and without brace has been carried out due to different morphological and tissue characteristics of child's and adult's head. The 3D realistic models of the child's and adult's head, with the jaw having the orthodontic brace, have been designed. The shapes and features of the child and adult head model, as well as the distance between the electromagnetic source and the exposed object, have an important role in the evaluation of the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). The applied procedure is based on the numerical solution of the electromagnetic waves propagation equations. The numerical analysis has been performed at the frequency of 3G (0.9GHz). The obtained results are represented within the teeth positioned on the side of the electromagnetic radiation source. Based on the obtained results, one can conclude that the presence of orthodontic brace affects the increase of electric field and SAR within the teeth. Excerpts "According to previous studies, one can find that the metal objects can significantly increase the amount of absorbed energy. The authors in [1] have found that the SAR values can be several times greater in the presence of metal object. The effect of electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone on nickel release from orthodontic brackets has been taken into consideration in study [2]. It is found that the concentration of nickel in the artificial saliva in the exposure group was significantly higher than that of the control group. The level of the nickel released in this investigation was far below the toxic level but maybe enotr h that can lead to allergic reaction in humans. One of the previously studies [3] reported the ltn involuntary movements of the subjects, which had gold (metal) alloy dental inlay, caused by electromagnetic waves." "It is evident that the value of the electric field is significantly greater in the presence of an orthodontic brace for both models. Based on the results shown in Figs. 6-8, as well as the results given in Table 3, the overall conclusion is that the presence of an orthodontic brace increases the electric field strength within the teeth. 19 Also it is noticeable that the electric field strength in the case of a child is higher'comparing to the adult case." "Since the referent value for the electric field, prescribed by adequate standards at 0.9 GHz, is 41 V/1 -n, comparing the results obtained by numerical calculation with values prescribed by safety standards, it is evident that obtained results exceed the referent levels inside all teeth in both models (with and without the orthodontic brace). However, it should be kept in mind that in the case of model with orthodontic brace the values are many times greater than the allowable values." "Regarding the obtained results for SAR within the teeth, in the presence of an orthodontic brace, a significant increase in the amount of absorbed energy can be observed. The maximum of SARlg occurs in the tooth No. 6 in the case of a child (2.46W/kg). This value is about 65% higher comparing to the adult with orthodontic brace and 45% higher comparing to the results obtained for a child without orthodontic brace. In this tooth and tooth No. 5, the SAR1 g overcomes the safety values but only in the case of child in the presence of the orthodontic brace. The amount of absorbed energy inside the other teeth satisfies basic restriction. However, the increase in the amount of absorbed energy in the presence of an orthodontic brace is not negligible." "Based on the -obtained results, one can conclude that the presence of orthodontic brace causes increase of electric field and SAA within the teeth. In. some cases, those values overcome referent limits for electric field strength, i.e.; safety limits for SAIZ values." "Because of the mentioned before and the fact that each standard contains specific safety limits of exposure to electromagnetic fields but they have been developed based on the research for adults, it should be established if they are sufficiently valid also in case of children. The future researches should be focused on the impact of orthodontic brace on the electric field strength and amount of absorbed energy'at the frequency of LTE -4G, and the latest generation of mobile networks — 5G." Open,access paper: https://aces- societ y�org/includes/downloadpaper.php?of=ACES_Journal_December_2019_Pgper_17&nf=19-12-17 Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Changes Due to Exposure to Mobile Phone Electromagnetics Radiations in Normal and Glaucoma Eye Saped Shokoohi-Rad, Mohammad-Rez Ansari, Fatemeh Sabzi, Rahim Saffari, Parisa Rajaei, Farshid Karimi. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Changes Due to Exposure to Mobile Phone Electromagnetic Radiations in Normal and Glaucoma Eye. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 29;27(1):10-13. doi: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_20_19. DOI: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_20_19 Abstract Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of electromagnetic waves (EMWs) emitted by a mobile phone on the intraocular pressure (IOP) in the eyeball. Methods: This quasi -experimental study was conducted on 166 eyes from 83 individuals in the 40-70 age range who referred to "Khatam-al-Anbia Hospital, Mashhad, Iran" in 2016. There were two groups of participants, and the first one consisted of 41 participants who had normal eyes, whereas the second one comprised 42 participants who suffered from open -angle glaucoma disease. The IOP in both groups was measured and recorded by a specialist before and after talking 5 min on the cellphone with the help of the Goldman method. Statistical analysis such as paired t-test and analysis of variance was performed and all tests are statistically significant at (P < 0.05). For this purpose, the SPSS software (version 16) was applied. Results: IOP in the glaucoma eye (42 eyes) ipsilateral to mobile phone before and after the intervention was 18.64::L 6.7 and 23.53 ± 6.3, respectively (P < 0.001). However, IOP in the control group (41 eyes) ipsilateral to mobile phone before and after the intervention was 12.95 ± 3.5 and 13.39 ± 2.8, respectively (P = 0.063). IOP change in the opposite glaucomatous eye to mobile phone in glaucoma group (39 eyes) and normal group (44 eyes) was not significantly different before and after the phone call (P = 0.065 and P = 0.851) respectively). Conclusion: We found that the acute effects of EMWs emitted from the mobile phones can significantly increase the :IOP in glaucoma eye, while such changes were not observed in normal eyes. Open access paper: htlps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pme/articles/PMC7276173/ Continuous Exposure to 1.7 GHz LTE (4G) Electromagnetic Fields Increases Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species to Decrease Human Cell Proliferation and Induce Senescence Jlsu Choi, Kyeongrae Min, Sangbong Jeon, Nam Kim, Jeong-Ki Pack, Kiwon Song. Continuous Exposure to 1.7 GHz LTE Electromagnetic Fields Increases Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species to Decrease Human Cell Proliferation and Induce Senescence. Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 8;10(1):9238. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65732- 4. Abstract Due to the rapid development of mobile phone technology, we are continuously exposed to 1.7 GHz LTE radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs), but their biological effects have not been clarified. Here, we investigated the non -thermal cellular effects of these RF-EMFs on human cells, including human adipose tissue -derived stem cells (ABCs), Huh? and Hep3B liver cancer stem cells (CSCs), HeLa and SH-SY5Y 21 ;i cancer cells, and normal fibroblast IMR-90 cells. When continuously exposed to 1.7.GHz LTE RF -EMF for 72 h at 1 and 2 SAR, cell proliferation was consistently decreased in all the human cells. The anti- proliferative effect was higher at 2 SAR than 1 SAR and was less severe in ASCs. The exposure to RF -EMF for 72 h at 1 and 2 SAR did not induce DNA double strand breaks or apoptotic cell death, but did trigger a slight delay in the G 1 to S cell cycle transition. Cell senescence was also clearly observed in ASC and Huh7 cells exposed to RF -EMF at 2 SAR for 72 h. Intracellular ROS increased in these cells and the treatment with an ROS (reactive oxygen species) scavenger recapitulated the anti -proliferative effect of RF -EMF. These observations strongly suggest that 1.7 GHz LTE RF -EMF decrease proliferation and increase senescence by increasing intracellular ROS inhuman cells. - Excerpt Altogether, this study as well as other studies strongly suggest that RF -EMF exposure leads to a change in intracellular ROS levels that may result in genotoxic stress, decreased proliferation and cell senescence, or no physiological effects depending on ROS concentration and the differential sensitivity of various cells to ROS. Thus, the mechanism behind RF -EMF exposure altering intracellular ROS levels should be further studied to elucidate the biological effects of RF-EMFs. It is not plausible to directly predict the physiological effects of 1.7 GHz LTE RF -EMF from our cell -based study. However, the anti -proliferative effect of 1.7 GHz LTE RF -EMF on various human cells in this study suggests that the exposure to 1.7 G.l-1z L'S'E RF -EMF would be more harmful to children, whose adult stem cells should be very active for growth and may accelerate the aging of body cells. We also carefully suggest that the anti -proliferative effect of various cancer cells by 1.7 GHz LTE RF -EMF would be interpreted with care, considering that both positive and negative effects of RF -EMF have been reported on cancer development. Open access paper: https://www. nature. com/articles/s41598-020-65732-4 Electromagnetic Exposure Study on a Human Located, inside the Car Using the Method of Auxiliary Sources Jeladze VB, Nozadze TR, Tabatadze VA, et al. Electromagnetic Exposure Study on a Human Located inside the Car Using the Method of Auxiliary Sources J Communications Technology Electronics. 65(5): 457-464. May 2020. Abstract The article studies the effect of the electromagnetic field of wireless communications on a human inside a car- in the frequency ranges of 450, 900, and 1800 MHz, corresponding to the operational range of police radios and modern mobile phones. A comparative analysis of the influence of the Earth's surface under the 22 car is presented. The results of numerical calculations using the Method of Auxiliary Sources show the presence of resonance phenomena and a high reactive field inside the car, which leads to an undesirable increase in the level of absorbed energy in human tissues. Conclusions The Method of Auxiliary Sources was used to study the exposure of the electromagnetic field of a mobile phone's antenna on a human inside a car. The calculations took into account the effect of Earth's reflective surface under the car. The results showed that high -amplitude reactive fields inside the car can lead to a multiple increase in the SAR coefficient in human tissues compared to values obtained in the free space. It is recommended to reduce the duration of mobile phone calls inside a car. https://link. springer. coin/article/ 10. 1 134/S 1064226920050034 Effect of Electromagnetic Field_ Exposure on Mouse gain Morphological and Histopathological Profiling Judita Zyrnantiene, Vida Juozaitiene, Rasa Zelvyte, Vaidas Oberauskas, Ugne Spancermene, Antanas Sederevicius, Albina Aniuliene. Effect of Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Mouse Brain Morphological and Histopathological Profiling. J Vet Res. 2020 May 8;64(2):319-324. doi: 10.2478/jvetres-2020-0030. Abstract Introduction: Mobile phones (MP) and other electronic and communication devices that are used daily expose users to electromagnetic fields (EMF) and contribute to an increasing incidence of neurological disorders. Brain tissue is the closest organ to the MP as it operates, thus the influence of MP radiation on brain tissue is of particular concern, although research is still inconclusive. The present study investigated the possible effect of an EMF (1,350-1,375 megahertz (MHz)) from an MP on morphological and histopathological profiles in the mouse brain. Material and methods: Healthy BALB/c mice were assigned to three equal groups (a control and two experimental groups, n = 10 each). Experimental mice were exposed to EMFs continuously for 72 h, those of experimental group I to a 1,350 MHz field at a specific absorption rate (SAR) of 4.0 W/kg, and group II to a 1,375 MHz field EMF at an SAR of 4.0 W/kg. Brain segmentation and histopathological analysis were applied to detect changes in the morphometric parameters of the brain lobes and identify pathological lesions, respectively. Results:'Histopathology results revealed shrinkage of pyramidal neurons, presence of mild perivascular and perineural oedema, and some vacuolation of neurons and glial cells derived from souse great hemispheres. The lesions also included reduction of Purkinje cells, vacuolisation of 23 neurons and glial cells, and interstitial oedema in the cerebellum. Conclusion: MP distance of 3 cm from the cage may induce appreciable morphological changes in mouse brain strictures; therefore, more comprehensive research is essential for assessment of safe distance. These pronounced effects may interfere with the results of laboratory tests on murine experimental models in veterinary or biomedical research. Open access paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.Rov/pmc/articles/PMC7305646/ Investigating the impact of mobile range electromagnetic radiation on the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat during working memory Tafakori S, Farrokhi A, Shalchyan_ V, Daliri MR. Investigating the impact of mobile range electromagnetic radiation on the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat during working memory. Behavioural Brain Research. Available online 24 May 2020, 112703. htips:Hdoi.org/l0.1016/i.bbr.2020.112703. Highlights • Investigating the effects of radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation on local field potential signal. • Monitoring the- effects of radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation on working memory of the rat. • Evaluating the impact of mobile phone range exposure on medial prefrontal cortex of the rat. • Radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation may lead to temporary abnormal brain functioning. • Theta band of medial prefrontal cortex during working memory affected by mobile phone range radiation. Abstract Research has been focused on the effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF -EMR) emitted from a mobile phone on general health, especially the nervous system. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of RF -EMR on the brain mechanism of rats by recording local field potentials (LFPs) signals during working memory (WM) task. Subjects were exposed to 900 MHz from a dipole antenna daily for three hours. Exposure was applied, first on a short term base (1 week) and then on a long term base (4 weeks). Behavioral parameters were measured weekly while rats performed T -maze tasks in two types of normal and delayed. LFPs signals were simultaneously recorded by implanted microelectrode arrays on the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of rats. Results showed a significant increase (*p < 0.05) in the task completion time of exposed rats which vanished shortly after the end of short term RF -EMR exposure. Before exposure, during correctly performed delayed tasks, an increase (peak) in power changes of theta band (4-12 Hz) was observed. But during correctly performed normal tasks, an increase appeared only by applying RF -EMR exposure. The similarity in power changes pattern of theta band in both types of tasks was observed after long term exposure. Classification accuracy of LFPs in truly done normal and delayed tasks was compared in pre and post -exposure states. Initial classification accuracy was 84.2% which decreased significantly (*P < 0.05) after exposure. 24 These observations indicated that RF -EMR may cause unusual brain functioning which is temporary at least for short term exposure. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32461126/ Neuroprotective Efficacy of Luteolin on a 900 -MHz Electromagnetic Field -Induced Cerebellar Alteration in Adult Male Rat Ahmad Yahyazadeh, Berrin Zuhal Altunkaynak. Neuroprotective Efficacy of Luteolin on a 900 -MHz Electromagnetic Field -Induced Cerebellar Alteration in Adult Male Rat. Brain Res. 2020 May 30;146919. doi: 10.1016/j .bfainres.2020.146919. Abstract The adverse health consequences of exposure to electromagnetic field emitted from cell phone has recently raised public concerns worldwide. Also, the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) standard that operates in 900 MHz frequency is the most popular. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the adverse effect of exposure to 900 MHz EMF (1 h/day) on the cerebella of 12 -week-old rats. We also evaluated the protective activity of luteolin (20 µg/kg/day) against possible biological change in the cerebellar tissues exposed to EMF. Twenty-four male wistar albino rats were randomly assigned into four group of six rats: Control, EMF, EMF+luteolin, luteolin. Serological and biochemical analyses, as well as histopathological examination were performed on all cerebellar samples. We found that SOD (superoxide dismutase) level was significantly increased in the EMF group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). To the contrary, decreased SOD activity was detected in the EMF+luteolin group compared to control group (p < 0.05). The total number of Purkinje and granular cells was significantly decreased in the EMF group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In the EMF+luteolin group, the total number of Purkinje and granular cells was significantly higher than the EMF group (p < 0.05). Histopathological evaluation also showed destructive damage to the architectures of cerebellar tissues. Our results suggest that exposure to :EMF may cause cellular damage to the rat cerebellum. Further, the improvement of cerebellar damage may have resulted from antioxidant efficacy of luteolin by alleviating oxidative stress. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32485174/ Decreased Level of Plasma nesfatin-1 in Rats Exposed to Cell Phone Radiation Is Correlated With Thyroid Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress, and Apoptosis Noha I Hussien, Ayman M Mousa, Abeer A Shoman. Decreased Level of Plasma nesfatin-1 in Rats Exposed to Cell Phone Radiation Is Correlated With Thyroid Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress, and Apoptosis Arch Physiol Biochem. 2020 Jun 17;1-7. doi: 10.1080/13813455.2020.1778037. Abstract 25 Context: Exposure to Electomagnetic radiation fields of cell phones causes thyroid dysfunction and a previous study revealed that nesfatin-1 may affect functions of the thyroid gland. Objective: To study the role of nesfatin-1 on functions of rat's thyroid gland exposed to EMRF. Materials and methods: Thirty adult male rats were divided equally into 3 groups as group I, group II and group III. The experiment extended for 30 days then the plasma nesfatin-1 level, thyroid functions, and thyroid tissue oxidative stress were assessed. Also;, histological and immunohistochemical study studies were done to evaluate structural and apoptotic changes of the thyroid gland. Results: There was a significant decrease in plasma nesfatin-1 level and thyroid functions with an increase in oxidative stress and apoptosis. Interestingly, there was a correlation between nesfatin-1 level and markers of thyroid function, oxidative stress and apoptosis. Conclusion: Nesfatin-1 plays a role in thyroid dysfunctions of rats exposed to mobile phone radiation. https://://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32552170/ Revisiting 35 and 94 GHZ,Millimeter Wave Exposure to the Non -human Primate Eye James E Parker, Charles W Beason, Stephen P Sturgeon, William B Voorhees, Samuel S Johnson, Kaitlin S Nelson, Leland R Johnson, Jeffrey N Whitmore. Revisiting 35 and 94 GHZ Millimeter Wave Exposure to the Non -human Primate Eye. Health Phys. 2020 Jun 3. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001216. Abstract A previous study reported thermal effects resulting from millimeter wave exposures at 35 and 94 GHz on non -human primates, specifically rhesus monkeys' (Macaca mulatta) corneas, but the data exhibited large variations in the observed temperatures and uncertainties in the millimeter wave dosimetry. By incorporating improvements in models and dosimetry, a non -human primate experiment was conducted involving corneal exposures that agreed well with a three -layer, one-dimensional, thermodynamic model to predict the expected surface temperature rise. The new data'indicated that the originally reported safety margins for eye exposures were underestimated by 4:1 ± 201/0 over the power densities explored. As a result, the expected minimal visible lesion thresholds should be raised to 10.6 ± 1.5 and 7.1 -h 1.0 J cin at 35 and 94 GHz, respectively, provided that the power density is less than 6 W cm for subjects that are unable to blink. If the blink reflex was active, a power density threshold of 20 W cm could be used to protect the eye, although the eyelid could be burned if the exposure was long enough. https-.Hpubmed.iicbl.nlm.nih.gov/32501817/ 27