HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0989.060 2018-2020 Testimony of COUNTY CLERK
Pacific Resource Partnership COUNTY OF HAWAI'I
RECEIVED
County of Hawaii Time I1:144 By MI
County Council Date JUL 2 1 -2020
Hawaii County Building
Councilmember Aaron S.Y. Chung, Chair
Councilmember Karen Eoff,Vice Chair
Bill 179—Establishing a County Construction Code Relating to Building Construction and Related Systems
Within a Building Under Construction by Amending the Hawaii County Code 1983 (2016 Edition, as
Amended)
Wednesday,July 22, 2020
Aloha Chair Chung,Vice Chair Eoff and Members of the Council:
Pacific Resource Partnership (PRP) is a non-profit market recovery trust fund which represents
approximately 7,000 men and women union carpenters and 240 large and small contractors.With our
expertise in research, compliance, marketing, and project advocacy,we are committed to building a
stronger, more sustainable Hawaii in a way that promotes a vibrant economy, creates jobs, and enhances
the quality of life for all residents of Hawaii.
PRP writes in strong support-of Councilmember Poindexter's Proposed Amendments to sections 5-3-2
through 5-3-5 and 5A-3-22(Appendix L; Factory-built Housing(FBH)), of Bill 179(Comm. No. 989.27).
Councilmember Poindexter's proposed amendments ensure that the permitting and inspection
requirements for FBH parallel the requirements that traditional homebuilders must follow.This will both
protect the health and safet-/of the consumer and create fair and equal opportunities for all
homebuilders.
It is inequitable for the County to maintain a special pathway for FBH through "Appendix L", allowing FBH
to bypass permitting and inspection requirements during the manufacturing process,while locally-based
construction contractors must comply with these requirements when they construct any building or
structure.The proposed construction code must,first and foremost, protect public health and safety,
safeguard property, and promote the public welfare by establishing minimum standards applicable to all
homebuilders within the County. Codes should not be written to provide special policies for companies
seeking to gain an advantage over their competitors. As such, PRP believes"Appendix L", as written is
inappropriate and prejudicial to the many traditional construction companies operating in Hawaii County
and employing a local workforce.
si
Comm. No. q;'.
Ref.To: P A (1C! ,s
Ref. Date 7 22 W20 PRP
POWER OF PAR T r �§ i �,_ 01 � six,�� '�."s"
THE
-
s
s
PHONE- 000.528.5557 1100ALAKEASTREET I4TH FLOOR TWITTER: I WWW.FACEBOOK.COW
H004OLULU(HE96813 F RPRPHAWI9I I PACIFICRESOURCEPARINERSHIP
� _ I
(Continued From Page 1)
PRP:also notesthat'the inclusion of special policies for FBH within the proposed building code will have a
negative inipact,on the construction industry,which plays a vital)) role in stimulating the local economy
and improving the existing quality'of life for the County's residelnts. Amongst those in the construction
industry are.highly s'killed.carpenters: 1)who have completed a State-approved apprenticeship program;
2)who'have'a wealth of knowledge and experience building in the local construction industry; and 3)who
are paid good middle-class wages that are spent in the local eccnomy.These are some of the jobs that
FBH will likely eliminate if given preferential treatment in the proposed construction code. FBH is built
within a factory using automated tools and a smaller labor force than on-site construction.The proposed
code enables FBH to take advantage of existing loopholes in the building code to gain a competitive
advantage over the traditional homebuilder who must follow standard permitting and inspection
requirements.
Moreover, existing provisions within "Appendix L" allowing for 'BH to be manufactured outside of Hawaii
County will also take away jobs from the local workforce witho t any assurances that the FBH is safe and
reliable—other counties, states,territories or countries may lack the same quality and safety standards as
Hawaii County.
To ensure that all homebuilders are treated equally under the construction code and the health and
safety of the consumer is protected, PRP respectfully requests that this Council adopt Councilmember
Poindexter's Proposed Amendments.Thank you for this opportunity to submit written testimony.
•
,110)
PRP