HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0047.037 2020-2022 ICowid(
'►1 211
cow,
From: Michelle Suber -v
Seat: Monday, December 21, 2020 12:27 PM
To: Council Testimony
Subject: Oppose Bill 217
Aloha County Council members,
I write with a request-a plea -to oppose Bill 217, prohibiting pedestrian access to all but a select few. {
It is concerning that this is being brought to the council just two days before Christmas, right at a time when many of us are putting
our attention on our families and the holiday. This move really doesn't provide adequate or appropriate time for public comment.
I have lived in Hawai'i for 22 years, most of that time on the Hamakua coast. I have heartbroken during my last few visits to Waipio
valley to see the incredible, unsustainable activity of both locals and tourists alike. The emotion is hard to describe, but the dialogue
in my mind goes like this: "They have no idea how sacred this place is." Of course, I am making this presumption based on the
behaviors I see, and recognize that I could be missing the mark. But the overarching desire is to protect this sacred land and to
inspire both locals and visitors to behave in a pono manner.
Personally, I rarely go to Waipio Valley unless I am carrying on to Waimanu Valley,which I do several times a year, typically as a day
trip. I do not play loud music, let my dog poop on the beach, or spray reef-damaging sunscreen all over myself. I just walk(or run)
by, with respect and care,and aim to keep my impact as minimal as possible. This is my church,even though I am not a Native
Hawaiian. I am opposed to a bill what would destroy my ability to worship Waipio's nature (unless I bring my 4wd along with me,
then it is ol(!?).
There are many issues surrounding the real purpose behind the bill, beyond what is stated. The answer to these issues requires,
first, being completely honest about what those issues are. I do not think safety is really the top concern. And even if it were,
restricting pedestrians is not the most comprehensive way to address it. Once we really lay out why we need to make change (and I
agree change is needed),then we need to have a comprehensive and thoughtful way to implement a meaningful plan. Calling it "a
start" is, truthfully, a cop out. We can do better.
Walking to and along the coastline is a sacred and protected right for all people. It is unethical to restrict it. That road is the only
reasonable way to access the coastline, and it is discriminatory to allow cars and not walkers/runners,the latter of which is so much
less impactful than cars.
I like the idea of restricting cars, and, even more, restricting tourists. What a breath of fresh air during Covid-related travel
restrictions to finally be able to truly relax and feel the power of this amazing place.
Let's work together to make this right,truly addressing the real issues. Please vote NO on 217.
Aloha,
Michelle Suber
Comm. No. 41 !
Ref. To: 1�1�Y1G1
1 e . ?ate r