HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN GOREDC 2021/05/04 2020-2022 Committee on Governmental Operations,
Relations, and Economic Development
Stn Session
West Hawaii Civic Center
74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway, Building A
Kailua-Kona, Hawai i
May 4, 2021
CALL TO The regular meeting of the Committee on Governmental Operations, Relations,
ORDER: and Economic Development was called to order at 1:00 p.m., in the Council
Chambers, Kailua-Kona, by Ms. Heather L. Kimball, Chair.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Ms. Heather L. Kimball, Chair
Ms. Ashley L. Kierkiewicz, Vice Chair
Mr. Aaron S. Y. Chung, Member
Ms. Maile Medeiros David, Member
Mr. Holeka Goro Inaba, Member
Mr. Matt Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder, Member
Ms. Susan L. K. Lee Loy, Member (came in later)
Mr. Herbert M. "Tim" Richards, III, Member (came in later)
Ms. Rebecca Villegas, Member
STATEMENTS The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business,
FROM THE Statements from the Public on Agenda Items.
PUBLIC ON
AGENDA ITEMS: (There were none.)
CHR. KIMBALL: We'll move right into Communications. Can you read into
the record, Comm. 216, Mr. Clerk?
COMMUNI- The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business,
CATIONS: Communications.
Comm. 216: REQUESTS AN UPDATE FROM THE 2018 KILAUEA ERUPTION
RECOVERY TEAM REGARDING THE LAUNCH OF THE VOLUNTARY
HOUSING BUYOUT PROGRAM
From Council Member Ashley L. Kierkiewicz, dated April 14, 2021.
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
Motion to Approve: Ms. Kierkiewicz moved to close file on Comm. 216.
Seconded by Mr. Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder.
CHR. KIMBALL: I believe we have Director Zendo Kern from the Planning
Department and Douglas Le, also from Planning.
(Note: At this time, Planning Director Zendo Kern came forward to
address the members of the Committee.)
MR. KERN: Good afternoon, Madam Chair and Committee Members. Zendo
Kern, Planning Director here. I'm here to mainly give a lot of positive praise at
the end of the presentation. I'll turn the primary subsistence presentation over to
Douglas Le in Hilo. I believe he has some slides. I contemplated giving praise at
the beginning, but I think after he explains it, I'll get the praise at the end.
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Chair, if I could just tee-up the conversation?
CHR. KIMBALL: Of course, Council Member Kierkiewicz.
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Thank you. Last Friday, April 301h, you know, our
recovery team launched the Voluntary Housing Buyout Program. This is the
largest Federal grant our County has every received. It's a complex process that I
think the recovery team has really simplified. And in the last couple of days, I
think well over 100 individuals have applied to the program. I wanted to use this
opportunity to make sure folks know that the program has been activated. And if
there are any questions, or current questions that have been coming in, this would
be an excellent forum to bring that up at this time.
And because we are under the gun to provide a substantial amendment to the
current action plan with the additional $21 million coming from the Federal
Government, I wanted to make sure we have the data to date to kind of support
and direct the direction of that amendment. So, thank you.
CHR. KIMBALL: Thank you, Council Member.
MR. KERN: Madam Chair?
CHR. KIMBALL: Go ahead, Mr. Kern.
MR. KERN: In the spirit of teeing it up, I'll frontload it. So part of the disaster
recovery was the buyout program that you're all very aware of. When I came into
this position, I've had the opportunity to work with Douglas and launching the
buyout program was one of the top priorities. So a date of April 30'h was set.
Page 2
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
And in the spirit of kind of the same thinking of EnerGov, like we need to get this
up, let's burn the ships at the shore, let's move forward. Even though it's an
aggressive timeline, we decided to keep that timeline. The work that Douglas and
his team has done from that time, specifically over the last two months, has been
huge. I'm talking, you know, hiring a lot of staff, putting rules, policies,
procedures; getting the space; coming to the questionnaire; there's so many
components to it.
And the diligence and the work that they had done is amazing. And the fact that
we didn't have to push. They stood it up on the 30''. They started taking
applications with was absolutelyI don't know, amazing. Under a lot of stress,
under a lot of pressure, but they pulled it off. So I just wanted to give that praise.
Really, really proud of the whole team, and Douglas has some really great
information to update the committee with. Thank you.
CHR. KIMBALL: Thank you, Director. Mr. Le you want to go ahead and
thanks, excuse me. Take it over?
(Note: At this time, Disaster Recovery Officer Douglas Le came forward
to address the members of the Committee.)
MR. LE: Disaster Recovery Officer, Douglas Le. You know, really thank you,
Chair, for creating this time to be able to provide an update about the broader
community about where we are with the Kilauea Housing Buyout Program.
You know, I think we're coming together on I think a very important day. You
know,just after our three-year anniversary from the beginning of the eruption.
You know, I know that folks are going through a lot right now, both kind of still
grappling with their own recovery efforts, a sense of, I think, losses folks
experienced and anniversaries like this do bring that up. But, I think also, for
those for whom this buyout program is a solution and is part of their recovery
effort, you know, I think we're very proud to be able to stand this up for folks.
Really one of the more concrete recovery solutions that the County has been able
to initiate with the support of our partners and also really being driven by the
direct kind of discussions we've had with impacted residents from the very
beginning of the eruption.
You know, I know that we came here together to provide an update on the
Volunteer Housing Buyout Program. To really help inform that I'd like to kind of
ground the conversation by providing an update on the Kilauea Housing Recovery
Survey that we launched a couple months ago. Really the data is really indicating
what demand could look like.
Page 3
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
The context that folks currently are living in, in terms of the access to resources
and what is still outstanding that's impeding people's ability to recover and to
kind of secure permanent housing. And it's also kind of providing a lot of
direction of kind of where this really unique Federal resource through the
Community Development Block Grant for the actual recovery could go.
So, you know,just to ground us today, I'd like to cover some of the basic findings
from the survey, and then how that has informed our roll out of the buyout
program and some of our next steps.
(Note: At this time, Douglas Le, provided a presentation to the members
of the Committee. A copy of the presentation is made a part of the record,
see Comm. 216.1.)
MR. LE: So I acknowledge that that's a lot of numbers, but what does it actually
mean in terms of our direction forward? This survey effort was a way to really
understand where people are now, right, when we launched it was nearly three
years after the eruption.
The data indicates that there's still very strong demand for the buyout and an
indication that much of the CDBGDR (Community Development Block Grant
Disaster Recovery) funds that are available to the County to support recovery
from the Kilauea eruption could be allocated towards meeting demand. But we're
aren't solely relying on this survey data to really manage demand and understand
who we could serve through the implementation of the program. And I'll get to
that point in a little bit as well.
What is so really key though, and I know this has really been an issue, we've kind
of sought very specific clarity from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development(HUD). And it is that, you know, based on the requirements
associated with our funding in the Federal Register Notice, we must allocate these
funds towards meeting our unmet housing recovery needs before these funds can
be allocated towards otherwise eligible activities, like general disaster recovery
services, infrastructure or economic revitalization. So in the way that we must
continue prioritizing these funds in housing, you know, that it's very clear that the
buyout program could really allocate the majority of funds that we have available
to us.
You know, Council Member Kierkiewicz spoke to, not only the $83 million we
have currently available to us, but also the $23.7 million that HUD has allocated
to the County of Hawaii.
Page 4
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
Our next step is to do a substantial amendment to the Action Plan to be able to
receive that additional $23.7 million and to program it, right, to allocate those
funds towards programs or projects.
At this point in time, we are looking to allocate all the funds available to us
through the substantial amendment in service of the buyout program. And really
the demand, based on what we know from the surveys, is indicating in that
direction. However, we are also looking at real program data, right? Really who
applies, how many applicants can make it through the pipeline and monitoring,
and really kind of taking stock of what that budget allocation looks like relative to
real-time program performance, right? How many applications are in; how many
are closing; what does the remaining balance look like?
So I think this survey data, which is why I wanted to begin with it, is incredibly
foundational and does kind of set very clear direction on where the demand is and
what is possible. But I think it's also going to be important to monitor and you
know, keep the community more broadly updated about what the performance of
the program is.
So I wanted to kind of share that in terms of what the survey is indicating to us in
some of kind of the near term steps. We anticipate working on the substantial
amendment to the Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant
funds over the next month, month-and-a-half. And essentially kicking off a
public comment period ahead of our deadline to submit this draft of substantial
amendment to HUD for their review and approval following public engagement
in the public comment period, which we anticipate in June.
So the heart of the matter for today, you know, as both Director Kern and
Council Member Kierkiewicz spoke to, we were very excited to be able to come
together to launch this buyout program on April 30th,just last Friday.
You know, the program itself has already seen pretty significant demand. We've
received over 100 applications for Phase 1, which encompasses primary homes.
That application period started on April 30th and will run through July 31".
We've also received, I believe more than two dozen registrations for those
properties that would be eligible for the future phases. Essentially second homes,
which are kind of eligible for applications starting November 1st through January
30th. And then even a number of undeveloped parcels, you know, for which
applications will not be accepted until May 2nd
Page 5
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
And for applicants or folks who are considering this program, you know, please
know that while we are accepting applications in this prioritization, and this
phasing effort, you know, if you were eligible for Phase 1 as a primary home, and
you were not able to kind of make the decision or get the application together by
July 31": Folks from Phase 1 will have opportunities to apply during Phase 2 and
during Phase 3; and same with Phase 2 and into Phase 3. You know, we're here
to try to make this very complicated process as straight forward and kind of
client-centered as best we can, with the amazing staff, we've been able to identify
and kind of bring on board as well as clear information and communication of
what people can expect.
You know, I really want to point people to our website, recovery.hawaiicounty.gov
to access information, not only about the Buyout Program, but also in terms of
accessing the application form and instructions form that we created to help people
navigate that document. And also, some background information, like a checklist
of what people could prepare and what the process actually looks like from start to
finish.
You know, as I mentioned before, we have been meeting a lot of people who have
been dropping off their applications the last couple of days. I think people are
excited about what this solution could be for them in their recovery. I will say
that, at this point in the process we are requesting an application form. Folks do
not need to submit their title information, their ID (identification), any of the
documentation that then supports the application just yet. We really want to use
the application form as a tool to understand each applicant's situation and to
specifically focus on the documents that we will need to kind of get their
application to complete and then to move them forward in the queue. And really,
that is why I'm making sure that folks are putting their time in to assemble the
documents that we need from them. And then also, we can manage those
documents in a secure and safe manner. You know, emailing that type of
documentation is not something that we would want.
And while we have launched the program to be reliant on our website to really get
a lot of information, we have also been doing active mailing. And so, for
example, for individuals who participated in the survey or been in touch with us
about receiving paper information, we did a mailer on Friday the 30'h of April
about the information that was coming and we've sent out already I think over
100 application forms for individuals who requested a paper application. So
again, I think it's the same mindset of making this program as bearer-free as
possible in terms of participation while also kind of thorough and accountable in
terms of the expenditure of Federal Grant funds to deliver on this program.
Page 6
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
And really with the opportunity to stand up a program team. You know, our new
Program Manager Julie Leialoha is here with me in the room. We have seven
other staff on board and a couple other joining in June. You know, I think folks
are really coming together to serve in this role because they have a passion for
serving the community and supporting families that have—are still in recovery,
right, and how this can be a solution for them.
If you need assistance, if anyone in our community wants to know more about the
program, has questions, you know, they can call us at 961-8996. We have an
email address that our whole team is receiving for questions, for application
submissions. And we've also opened up a Program Office here in Hilo across the
street from the County building at 100 Pauahi Street, Suite No. 200, right above
the American Savings Bank. And we are working on setting up a service
location, you know, by appointment only, both in Pahoa, to actually be accessible
to families. You know, many of whom we know stayed in Puna after they were
displaced from their properties.
And so I really appreciate the opportunity to kind of, not only to kind of update to
this body, but to also share information for people to connect to this program.
And you know, if you need assistance or you need questions answered, our staff is
here to help. I think, as Director Kern mentioned, this program has been the
priority for our team for the last several months, to be able to deliver an effective
program and start serving folks.
But in addition to acknowledging our staff team that's come together, I really
want to acknowledge different arms of the Planning Department, DPW
(Department of Public Works), DIT (Department of Information Technology),
and every single division of Finance who's also contributed to the effort to make
this possible. So, I'll pause there. Thank you.
CHR. KIMBALL: Thank you so much, Mr. Le, for that very comprehensive
overview. I will turn the floor back to you, Ms. Kierkiewicz, since you've kicked
this off.
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Thank you, Chair. Mahalo, Douglas for that really
comprehensive overview. And really,job well done. You know, we've stayed in
touch throughout your duration in this capacity, and I know that you worked
incredibly hard, especially over the last few months to pull together a really
excellent team.
I really appreciated the opportunity to connect with these folks and to know that
they have experience in this arena or are connected to Puna. I just feel that
they're going to be really able to connect with our community in a very
empathetic and compassionate way. So really well done. Thank you.
Page 7
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
And I did want to offer, and I know I said this before, but just want to remind you
we're reactivating the Pahoa Council Office. We've secured a couple of
partnerships including a Neighborhood Watch Coordinator to be in the space.
And so I do want to offer that up to you. Central location in downtown Pahoa, so
you folks—if you find value in using that space, we can certainly accommodate
requests to meet there.
I have a few questions related to the program. I am wondering about
documentation and if there are any issues with title. How long are you going to
be giving folks to provide that information, resolve any of those issues before you
make a determination that, "You know what, we need to move on."
MR. LE: That's a great question. You know, I think for many of the properties
that would be eligible for this program, I'd like to think that the title escrow
process will be pretty straight forward, especially in the more established
residential areas. But of course, knowing the history of our island and how things
can become complicated, we know that there will be applicants that may face title
issues. And so, we're weighing kind of, not only how any title escrow company
we bring on board, can provide support and guidance and the research needed to
navigate these complicated issues with potential applicants.
We also know that sometimes attorneys may need to get involved to really get
people to the finish line, right,to be able to move forward with the acquisition of
property. And so talking to kind of legal service providers, attorneys in the
community, about who might be prepared to receive those kind of referrals, you
know, through a warm handoff with our staff.
You know, we haven't really specifically called out the policy, as you framed it,
how long we would wait for issues of title or probate to be resolved, but right now
we are looking at something close to a year. A year is a lot of time in the program
lens. But a year is not a lot of time in terms of resolving more complicated
situations of title and those kinds of issues. And so that's the current thinking.
You know, we want to start taking a hard look at how other County programs
have dealt with that issue and what expected timelines could look like. We have
personal experiences, right? Just from members of our team who've been through
similar things. So you know, no less than a year, but then we really want to gauge
if we need some additional time.
For sure,the program itself, right, from the beginning of Phase 1 to the end of
Phase 3 is a year-and-a-half course. And we know we'll need some time after that
to really button up any pending acquisitions and also any grant close out. And
that two-year timeframe roughly is within the six years we have to expend the
grant. And so, I will say there is some flexibility to be able to be accommodating
to applicants who may need more time to navigate the situation. But I think it's
Page 8
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
also important to say that, you know, in choices to extend time for title escrow
issues, probate issues, that means that's encumbered funds with a clock on them,
right,to be able to serve others or to even think about programing towards other
housing-type programs.
So I share that to say that that is the balance that, you know, we're going to have
to be really monitoring on a quarterly basis at a minimum. And one of the
benefits of actually approaching this program from a phased approach is that each
pause, each application phase gives us an opportunity to take stock and actually
take a hard look at these kind of questions in addition to just more standard
questions like budget expenditures, and you know, workflows and pipelines of
applicants so that we can plan the next steps accordingly with each phase.
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Okay, so just to summarize, about a year. I just want to
make sure. I really appreciate all those details. You know, the question I ask is
because there are as you say, six years to spend the funding. And you've
established a very, I think a good cadence for how you want to, you know, phase
out this program and offer it to different tiers of folks in the community. And I
just appreciate you working at that accelerated pace but good to know that there is
flexibility in accommodating, you know, helping folks with all their issues.
Director, did you need to add anything, no, okay, great. Thank you.
Couple more questions. I'm curious at what point in the process do we make the
determination around what we are going to be doing with the properties that we
acquire. We talk about ways in which we can steward the land, if there are, you
know, potentials for some light agriculture. Just curious as to when we begin to
have those conversations.
MR. LE: Right. So, in planning for the program, we felt that it was going to be
really critical to understand the properties themselves that are being acquired and
what the pipeline looks like in order to really set down what future management
could be. You know, we with some due diligence about how land is managed
following buyout programs from other parts of the country but also best practices
around how public/private partnerships have succeeded in terms of stewarding
land and conserving open space here on our island, we know that we have some
options, right, of what that could be. You know, directed to your question, we
really want to have a clear sense of the properties that are coming our way. So it
is, I think, probably well into Phase 3, because the undeveloped properties could
have quite a number coming through. And, you know, whether it's a couple of
houselots or, you know, five contiguous farm lots. You know,those present very
different types of management opportunities. And so I think within the next, you
know, 12 to 18 months is when that picture will become more clear. And, you
know, really look forward to being able to engage the community in what that
approach looks like for future management with the visibility on what the
properties are.
Page 9
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Great. Thank you. And I'm hoping that, you know, I just
want to put out there, I do want to explore partnerships with say, Habitat for
Humanity. I think there are going to be situations where we're buying properties
that have homes that are still intact. And so if there are ways in which we can do
waste diversion and find ways to take those liabilities and turn them into assets. I
don't know if we can, you know, create new homes from them, but this is an
opportunity for a raised community garden bedside. I don't know, but I do want
to say that, you know, I have reached out to Habitat for Humanity to have that
conversation. I think it's really important. And if there are ways in which we can
encourage more workforce development with the deconstruction of some of these
homes, let's talk about it. There's just so many opportunities that we can provide
experiences to our community.
You know, the final question I have is in relation to economic development. You
know, when we've had conversations as Housing Agency, folks wanted to see
some of this money programs for economic development. Can you speak at all to
that? I know that we have other buckets of funding that we can tap to support
economic development specifically, but in reviewing the slide deck, you know,
you mentioned roughly $93 million being earmarked to resolve or respond to
some of the folks that have indicated interest in the program. So there is sizable
funding available. So I'm just curious, you know, do you foresee any of this
being pivoted to support economic development initiatives.
MR. LE: Sure. Happy to have worked with—kind of respond to that, but also I
want to leave some space for Director Kern to chime in too. You know, specific
to this funding with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the
requirements in our Federal Register Notice that covers our funds, it's just not our
County, but also 2018 and 2019 grant recipients. It is very clear that we must
address our housing unmet need prior to being able to program any of the HUD
funds towards other otherwise eligible activities.
And so, you know, the numbers break down in the Action Plan. We'll be
updating the figures as well in the Substantial Amendment Plan, but the back
envelope is this: You know, once we've identified our $269 million, kind of
Housing need from this eruption, we've factored in any assistance folks may have
received through FEMA, the volunteer organizations, we've factored in this HUD
grant, and the remaining balance essentially, right, is $133 million. The one
missing piece of the picture, which we've talked about a little earlier was getting
precise clarity on insurance payments. Because insurance payments are a type of
disaster assistance that can be factored in, in order to kind of resolve some of our
unmet housing recovery need.
Page 10
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
You know, the survey was, I think a really good indicator of what we could
expect, but it was voluntary kind of sharing information. It was survey level. It
points to direction, but we're looking after kind of continuing to chasing down
this information and get the full picture. What we do know about the whole
picture, though, is that, you know, to resolve that $133 million worth of unmet
housing recovery need following this HUD funding, and if we know that, you
know, roughly 700 impacted properties had structures on them that could be
insured, half of them had insurance, you know, insurance payouts need to be
across-the-board, be averaging closer to $500,000 each this is my brain-math,
we'll look at the actual numbers in a bit. And so we have concerns about even if
we were able to get that full picture of direct insurance payouts, and folks are still
getting paid out to this day. Just heard about some resolution of cases this week.
We may never get to that$133 million that would resolve our housing unmet
recovery needs, which would then enable us to kind of explore other types of
programs with this funds, such as economic recovery.
I think the infrastructure investments that are happening kind of with the FEMA
funds, in terms of reinvestment of public infrastructure, support to our economy,
and the revitalization of the area, I feel that, you know, some of the other grant
funds through our Kilauea Recovery Grants, almost half of that funding did go
towards agriculture and other kinds of economic operations to get setup again. I
think there's real ways to still work in economic revitalization. I just want to be
very clear on HUD's administration of these funds and what we are required to
work through. And even within our discretion to program funds within eligible
activities, like Housing.
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Great. Thanks for that clarification. Director, did you
want to add anything?
MR. KERN: Not a lot to add. Douglas did a really great job doing that. I think
it's important to keep into account that we have the different funding
mechanisms. And that economic recovery for Puna and Pahoa is very, very
important. But the unmet housing needs through this funding source are going to
be extremely challenged as Douglas laid out.
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Okay, thank you. Yeah, economic support, recovery,
development, of Pahoa and Puna is, you know, critical. You know, yesterday we
celebrated not celebrated, but we marked the third year anniversary of the
eruption. Lava Zone Museum, they hosted a wonderful gathering of community
to just mark where we are, and we're still strong and resilient. But the town
certainly needs some help, so anyway in which we can tap some of those funding
streams to support, you know, economic revitalization, you know, I'm a huge fan
and I'm happy to help support.
Page 11
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
Thank you very much for your time and the information. I really appreciate it,
how we've used data consistently throughout this this process to really inform
how you've shaped the program. I think the application is very simple, which is
not—you know, and I applaud you for that. I mean I think this government
sometimes tend to overcomplicate. And so this was very refreshing. Thank you
for that. And again, really appreciate the use of data in helping us to form our
decisions and direct future investments. Keep us posted on how this progresses.
Thank you. Chair, I yield.
CHR. KIMBALL: Thank you. Mr. Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder.
MR. KANEALI`I-KLEINFELDER: Thank you, Chair. Thank you for being her
today, gentlemen. Doug, thank you. Good job, as usual and on point. A question
for you, what rules do we have to follow as our guidelines set forth by HUD as far
as what happens when we purchase or we obtain the properties through the
Voluntary Buyout Program?
MR. LE: So specific to the management of these properties following the buyout,
HUD has general guidelines and requirements. The most essential to those being
that these properties must be maintained as open space moving forward.
Oftentimes, that is worked through in a deed restriction as part of the acquisition
of the property by the local government. You know, whether we rezone the
property specifically, I think is kind of, to be explored. But it's really that
mechanism of the deed restriction for the use of the property.
In other disaster areas, like in floods, it is pretty clear that these properties after a
buyout are often utilized to manage flooding. Whether that be kind of best
management practices; kind of returning areas of wetland, building in culverts.
And you know, there are specific really best practices, I would even go so far as
requirements relative to flood control that govern what can and cannot happen on
a property after it gets bought out. But that's when we're dealing with water.
There aren't such specific level of best practice guidance or even requirements in
our context, you know, following an eruption. And so, this is kind of uncharted
territory in terms of how these specific Federal dollars under the Community
Development Block Grant for disaster recovery can be applied.
We can look to, you know, floodplain management practices as an equivalent, but
I have examples where standard practice there just doesn't make sense in a lava
context. I think long story short, though, we do have a lot of examples of how
conservation areas in parts of our island have been managed effectively. And so
we're also kind of taking a very deep exploration of what we can bring into the
management of these acquisitions, these buyout properties, after they have
changed hands for their future management.
Page 12
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
MR. KANEALI`I-KLEINFELDER: So it sounds like there's not a clear
document for us to follow then?
MR. LE: Yeah, not from HUD's perspectives. That would be much more clear in
other realms of this program.
MR. KANEALI`I-KLEINFELDER: So as we get further in, I mean, who do we
have this discussion with, what we can or cannot do with the properties that are
obtained from the buyout program.
MR. LE: So there's definitely consultation with the local communities where
these buyouts are occurring. I think other really important voices, of course, are
you know, on the County side Property Management and Real Property Tax. This
is their bread-and-butter work every day. And you know, for us we also
anticipate doing some type of environmental review relative to the specific
change of use, right, where these types of management practices could be further
developed and kind of explored and a consensus built round them.
And so, you know, I don't mean to say that everything's on the table, but I do
think it's really important to focus in on, you know, where can we learn from,
who needs to be at the table, and also what business practices, procedures, or
really laws that we do have to consider in terms of mapping out what management
looks like.
I wish that things were as clear cut as they are in other types of contexts like
flooding, but we aren't there. And you know, I think, the other partner who really
needs to be consulted is HUD, because I think there's so much about our
experience with this program that is unique and has kind of pushed their envelope
a little bit too.
MR. KANEALI`I-KLEINFELDER: Does anyone from HUD—have they
understood and wrapped their heads around the lava aspect and the kind of
unknown future of Puna?
MR. LE: You know when, earlier before COVID, we did have opportunities for
them to visit here as part of the technical assistance and kind of the early work to
prepare for this program. We made sure that they did experience the eruption
area and what the land is like now to help set that context. It's very different
when you're just kind of talking about it. So we've created opportunity for them
to see firsthand.
Page 13
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
MR. KANEALI`I-KLEINFELDER: Okay. We have a good point in contact over
there? I mean, I'm looking down the line. If we acquire 200 properties and
maybe, let's say it's 500 acres, you know, what then? There has to be some kind
of guidance of what we can and cannot do as we walk into that? Obviously,
we're not going in blind. So is there a document that we can refer to so we can
understand what possibilities there may be within the guidelines?
MR. LE: You know, as of today, what I can point to is how they address issues in
flood context, for example. And so, even in some of our own building of this
program, that has been helpful for our staff to look at and evaluate and really
reflect on. But to point anyone to something specifically about our lava situation,
the document doesn't exist, and based on the knowledge of the lands that are
being identified for acquisition, and also the broader context of where these pieces
of land are, we've really got to intentionally, build that rule book for us within the
broader kind of context of consultation.
MR. KANEALI`I-KLEINFELDER: Okay, so, kind of but not really?
MR. LE: Examples, but nothing I can pull off the shelf today that indicates to us
this is how it should go or needs to go.
MR. KANEALI`I-KLEINFELDER: Okay, okay. I'd like a little more clarity on
that so that I can understand what we're going to be doing with a variety of
different sorts of property that may be obtained through the Voluntary Buyout
Program. It's important for us to understand as we walk into the future. You
know, overall though, this is a great opportunity. It's been coming for a long
time. And thank you for your perseverance.
I mean we're years in and families are still trying to figure out what to do and
how to move on. So, mahalo for what you're doing and for your information
today. Thank you, Sir. I yield, Chair, thank you.
CHR. KIMBALL: Thank you. Any other questions from the body? Alright,
with that I will thank Director Kern and you, Mr. Le, for your very
comprehensive transparent and well-informed presentation. Certainly appreciate
that you guys are kind of flying blind in some areas. This is a unique situation.
There's not another State in the Country that has to solve this problem.
So appreciate that you're pulling from resources that are available best you can,
but there's a lot of this that you're going to have to just invent, and I appreciate
that you're doing that with a good basis of information.
Page 14
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
Just wanted to do a quick highlight to something Council Member Kierkiewicz
said with respect to looking for ways to recycle, reuse any of the facility
buildings; facilities on these properties that we ultimately acquire. Thank you for
bringing that up. You know, it's not something that I was thinking about, but
yeah, let's divert that waste, let's reuse. Particularly now, I'm sure you all know
that plywood has doubled in price and it's hard to get concrete these days.
You know, we're just, I think, at the beginning of the shortage of a lot of building
materials. So if we can reuse this, I think that's great. And certainly from my
standpoint as a Council Member. And I hope my colleagues as well will put our
thinking caps on and figure out how we can facilitate that. But I just want to
thank you for highlighting that. Alright, oh I have another light on, Matt, go
ahead.
MR. KANEALI`I-KLEINFELDER: Thank you. One follow-up question, Doug.
If I remember right,this is six years we had to fulfill the buyout program, is that
correct?
MR. LE: The grant funds, we have six years to expend.
MR. KANEALI`I-KLEINFELDER: Six years to expend all the grant funds. The
priority being Housing. So what, do we have to wait the full six years before you
can start to look into doing other things? That was always the catching point
before.
MR. LE: Yeah, that's right. So these grant funds, and it's not easy to access
everyone kind of within our class of grantees. We have six years to expend the
funds. You know, whether you have $10 million like Kauai or dealing with
billions of dollars like Puerto Rico, right? And for us, even though we know that
we have that six-year window, we're actually centering more so the client-service
aspect of a program like this. And so, that even two years to deliver a buyout
program, especially perhaps for some of the property owners who are on the
undeveloped side, for those parcels. It's more time.
But our real focus and our real effort is to deliver on this program in order to meet
the needs of the folks we're looking to serve. Regardless of the larger window of
time we may have to spend the funds. Of course, if things pivot and new projects
or programs kind of come online, you know, we will still have that time to deliver
on that program. But it's, you know, not a bad thing to have a four-year cushion,
essentially, right, with such a complex project and a complex funding source.
MR. KANEALI`I-KLEINFELDER: Okay, so we have six years to spend and the
Voluntary Buyout Program will last ?
Page 15
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
MR. LE: I'd say, 18 to 24 months based on what we kicked off last week. You
know, that's accommodating the phasing and the time to actually close out those
applications towards the end of the program.
MR. KANEALI`I-KLEINFELDER: And then at the end of the two years, we can
start to look at what to do with any extra funds that may be unused.
MR. LE: Any remaining funds, that's right. I think the requirements and the
limits of where those dollars can be programed are exactly the ones that I talked
through today. That won't change in two years and that won't likely change at all
in the next six years that we have to expend the funds. But if there are
unexpended funds after this buyout program is completed, we can look at other
kind of housing solutions.
MR. KANEALI`I-KLEINFELDER: Okay, thank you, Sir. Thank you, Chair.
CHR. KIMBALL: Council Member Kierkiewicz, you have another question?
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Thank you. Douglas, one more question. I know a
component of this program is related to Housing Relocation Services. Could you
just talk a little bit about that? You know, what does that entail, who qualifies,
when is that program available to residents that are participating in the buyout
program?
MR. LE: Sure. No, thank you for suggesting that, actually. It's a point that I
didn't get to earlier. So in addition to the Voluntary Housing Buyout Program,
we have our Housing Relocation Services. The Housing Relocation Services are
only eligible for low to moderate income households. However, they are eligible
both for those who are participating in the buyout program, as well as other
property owners or renters who were displaced by the eruption or otherwise
directly impacted by the eruption but may not be wanting to go through the
buyout program, right? I think that's an option.
Essentially what the program offers is for an applicant who is looking to buy a
new home as part of their recovery. At the time that they apply, they can receive
up to ten percent, kind of down payment assistance essentially. And this is the
mid-to-low-to-moderate-income households. And for folks who are looking for
their next home to be a rental property. We can assist with essentially kind of two
months of the lease rent, which operates as the security deposit, right, to be able to
enter into a rental agreement. We know that can be a barrier for a lot of families,
in general, but especially kind of are experiencing kind of recovery from the
disaster event.
Page 16
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
And so, part of this is also a kind of a call out for families that were longtime
renters and were displaced when the home that they were renting was covered by
lava or isolated. This can be a resource for them, even though they may not be
eligible for the buyout program, because they didn't own the property.
And now that the buyout program is launched, we're looking to launch the
relocation services as like a sibling to the buyout program in the next week or so.
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Great. Thank you so much for those details. I remember
that program. I didn't hear you talk about it, so I wanted to make sure that you
shared with folks that this is also another thing that your team is coordinating.
Thank you. Chair, I yield.
CHR. KIMBALL: Alright. I think we are all set here. Again, thank you both for
being here today and thank you for your presentation. There's a motion on the
floor to close file on Comm. 216. All of those in favor?
Vote on Comm. 216: The motion to close file on Comm. 216 was carried by
Filed the following voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, David, Inaba,
Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder, Kierkiewicz, Lee Loy,
Richards, Villegas, and Chair Kimball—9.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Excused: None.
CHR. KIMBALL: Okay, thank you.
ORDER OF The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business, Order
RESOLUTIONS: of Resolutions.
(There were none.)
BILLS FOR The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business,
ORDINANCES: Bills for Ordinances.
(There were none.)
CHR. KIMBALL: Alright, I'll take a motion on adjournment.
Page 17
GOREDC-8 May 4,2021
ADJOURN- There being no further business, at 1:52 p.m., Ms. David moved to adjourn the
MENT: meeting. Seconded by Ms. Kierkiewicz and carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, David, Inaba,
Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder, Kierkiewicz, Lee Loy,
Richards, Villegas, and Chair Kimball—9.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Excused: None.
CHR. KIMBALL: We are adjourned. Thank you.
Approved:
S (a
Ms. eather L. Kim all, Chair (Date)
overnment Operations, Relations,
and Economic Development Committee
HK/dt
Page 18