Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0446.021 1998-2000 Lee A. Phelps 443 Rio Del Maz Boulevazd Aptos, California 95003-4723 January 10, 2000 Mr. Al Smith Puna Representative Hawaii County Council 101 Aupuni Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Mr. Smith, I'm an "absentee" property owner in Nanawale Estates (Lots 346/347, Unit 3B), and have been since 1971 when I purchased the lots while enroute to my second tour of combat duty in South Vietnam. I was faz from rich at the tone, and I remain so now. My decision to buy came only after I had thoroughly reviewed the covenants, conditions and restrictions applicable; the subdivision plot and development plan, as approved by County of Hawaii authorities; and the probability of an increase in property value over time. My investment was then--and remains now--of value only to the extent that county officials were acting in good faith when the subdivision plot and development plan were approved, to include appropriate zoning within the development boundaries to meet the eventual needs/desires of all who invested in Nanawale Estates. To arbitrazily change zoning within the development now, as I am advised you and certain other members of the council aze considering, would be a breach of faith and trust. I am further advised that a change in zoning from "open space" to "agriculturaUresidential" may be made only if there exists a "compelling public reason" to do so. To my knowledge, no such compelling pubhc reason exists, nor is one likely to develop in the foreseeable future if costs of building on the island remain at their current levels, or increase. These things being so, as they are, I'm sure you will understand that I firmly oppose any change that reduces the amount of open space within Nanawale Estates, or in any similarly funental way alters representations by the county and developers to prospective buyers, past or resent. Very truly yours, r L Comm. No. `2`j File No. ~ ~ /rte' Kef. To: PG Kef. Date JAN 2 6 2000