The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOM 0550.000 2020-2022 ••••;15:1-,t? •',y' Lee E.Lord " ,1, I Managing Director Mitchell D.Roth 1•i `•'i1",`�ft:k 1 Mayor - �'�- _ Robert H.Command •.../4TF 1F'r:••.•'v` Deputy Managing Director ►� Irnxut3 .iif gi �zhnzf`� ®ffirr of fipAlauor 25 Aupuni Street,Suite 2603 • Hilo,Hawai'i 96720 • (808)961-8211 • Fax(808)961-6553 KONA: 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy.,Bldg C • Kailua-Kona, Hawai'i 96740 (808)323-4444 • Fax(808)323-4440 November 18, 2021 • cy. .. mici Maile David, Council Chair --i.) ®� -< and Members of the County Council 'T1/47.:: County of Hawai`i is =1"7- 25 r25 Aupuni Street :.0 g=. Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Chair David and Members: SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20-000054) Request: Agricultural to Urban Applicant: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Tax Map Key: 2-4-001:168, Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii As required by Chapter 7, Sec. 6-7.5 (a), Hawai`i County Charter, transmitted herewith for the County Council's consideration and action are the Windward Planning Commission's letter and enclosures regarding the above-referenced request. Sincerely, f MITCHELL D. ROTH Mayor TCouncilHICDCS LU20-054 Enclosures . cc: Planning Department \. <6iComm. No. `�o I' Q 1 �j Ref. To: PG Ref. Date OEC - 2 20211 County of Hawai`i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. Mitchell D.Roth o�M•Y% N--:r�`• John Replogle,Chair Mayor .�% Gilbert Aguinaldo,Vice-Chair •: �';; .��:. Dean Au Lee E.Lord • "e'r_ Joseph Clarkson Managing Director if; ;,a•�:••`_ Michelle Galimba Dennis Lin Thomas Raffipiy County of Hawaii WINDWARD PLANNING COMMISSION Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 • Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)961-8288 • Fax(808)961-8742 November 16,2021 Maile David, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Chair David and Council Members: SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 20-000054) Request: Agricultural to Urban Applicant: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Tax Map Key: 2-4-001:168,Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii The Windward Planning Commission, at its duly held public hearing on November 4, 2021, recommended for your approval the proposed legislative bill to change the State Land Use District from Agricultural to Urban for approximately 9.09 acres of land. The property is located at 1450 Mohouli Street, directly west (mauka) of the Mohouli Senior Housing Project and the County of Hawaii Fire Administration Support Complex, approximately 1,600 feet west of the Mohouli Street and Komohana Street intersection, Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawai`i. The Commission concurs with the following Planning Director's recommendation for a favorable consideration of the request: The applicant, the Hawai`i Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC), is requesting a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban for 9.09 acres of land, which is the future site of the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project. The applicant intends to develop 90-units of affordable housing which aims to provide afforable housing and related services on a parcel in South Hilo, which was made available by the Govenors Executive Order No. 4531. According to the applicant, the proposed affordable housing development will seek exemptions from certain code requirements, pursuant to HRS 201H-38 of the Hawaii Revised Statues for the Hale Ola Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer Maile David, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i Page 2 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project from the County Council through a resolution submitted by the County of Hawai`i Office of Housing and Community Development. Construction of the proposed affordable housing project is anticipated to begin in early 2022 and be completed by the end of 2023. The completion of the full project will be dependent on funding availability and is expected to be completed by 2024. The total cost of the proposed project is estimated at$30 to $40 million. The approval of the reclassification from the State Land Use Agricultural to the Urban District for approximately 9.09 acres will not be in violation of Section 205-2, Chapter 205, Hawaii Revised Statutes, nor will it be inconsistent with the Land Use Commission Rules, the County General Plan, and the Hawaii State Plan. Under the Land Use Commission Rules, one of the standards for considering an area for urban reclassification states that, "In determining urban growth for the next ten years, or in amending the boundary, land contiguous with existing urban areas shall be given more consideration than non-contiguous land, and particularly when indicated for future urban use on state or county general plans." The project area conforms to this standard as it is situated adjacent to existing urban-designated lands to the south and is designated for future urban growth (Medium Density Urban) on the County's Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map in the General Plan. According to the General Plan, the MDU designation allows for village and neighborhood commercial and single family and multiple family residential and related functions (multiple family residential -- up to 35 units per acre). Thus, the SLU Boundary Amendment is consistent with the LUPAG MDU designation. Finally, the reclassification action would be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Hawai`i State Plan by providing urban type uses in close proximity to existing urban areas where adequate public facilities are already available and converting marginal or non-essential agricultural lands for appropriate urban uses while maintaining more productive agricultural lands in the agricultural district. The Urban District request would be consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use and Housing elements of the General Plan. The Urban District request would be consistent with the goals, policies and standards of the Land Use-Multiple Family Residential and the Housing Elements of the Hawai`i County General Plan by encouraging the construction of affordable housing. The Urban classification conforms to the standard that the development is within reasonable proximity to centers of trading and employment and to basic services such as schools, police and fire protection, transportation systems and water. Access to the subject property is proposed from Kupuna Place by way of an Maile David, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai` Page 3 easement over the adjacent parcel TMK: (3) 2-4-001:176 and Mohouli Street, both County roadways. Kupuna Place is a two-lane paved roadway with an existing pavement width of 32 feet within a 50 feet right-of-way. Mohouli Street is classified as a major collector road with an existing pavement width of 80 feet. The applicant conducted a Traffic Impact Assessment Report (TIAR) dated November 2020, prepared by AECOM Technical Services, Inc. The proposed affordable housing is anticipated to generate 48 a.m. peak hour trips and 68 p.m. peak hour trips. The TIAR concluded that traffic from the proposed affordable housing is expected to be minor. Additionally, the TIAR recommended the implementation of a right-in/right-out access on Mohouli Street with restriping part of the wide paved shoulder on westbound Mohouli Street as a right-turn only lane. At this time, the applicant is proposing full movement access on Kupuna Place as well as the right-in/right-out access on Mohouli Street to accomodate traffic generated by the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development. Furthermore, DPW has indicated all driveway connections and construction to allow connection to Kupuna Place and Mohouli Street will require Right-of-Way permits and will need to conform to Chapter 22, County Streets, of the Hawai`i County Code. Finally, DPW recommends that the applicant install streetlights and traffic control devices as may be required by their Traffic Division. According to the Department of Water Supply, County water can be made available to the property from the existing 12-inch waterline along Mohouli Street as well as along Kupuna Place. This waterline is also adequate to provide the required flow for fire protection. The applicant will connect to the County sewer system, which is available along Kahikini Street in the adjacent subdivision to the north via easements along TMKS: (3) 2-4-001:176 and 2-4-001:177. The applicant indicated that all waste generated by the project will be disposed of at appropriate sites designated by the Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Solid Waste Division. The applicant will comply with Federal, State and County laws, codes, rules, regulations and requirements for this project. Police, fire protection and emergency medical services are located in Hilo, less than two miles from the property. Electricity cable and telephone are available to the site. Urban Districts shall include lands characterized by "city-like" concentrations ofeo le structures, streets, urban level of services and other P P related land uses. This proposed reclassification action does not represent the creation of a new urban concentration, as the surrounding area is already an urban-like environment. Adjacent to the subject property to the east is a 5.35-acre parcel that has been designated for the Fire Administration Support Complex. Phase 1, 2 and 3 of the Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood are located further to the east and were established via County Council resolution using the HRS 201H-38 provision for exemptions from County Code. Maile David, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i Page 4 Properties located to the west and northwest, north and northeast consist of single-family dwellings on land zoned A-la and RS-10 that are part of the Sunrise Ridge Estate Subdivision. Additionally, properties to the east across Komohana Street and along Mohouli Street consist of single-family dwellings on lands zoned RS-10. The property located at the southeast corner of Komohana Street and Mohouli Street is designated UNV by the General Plan, for the use by the University of Hawai`i at Hilo. Other land uses within a half-mile radius to the south of the subject property include medical offices and the University Park, which houses a number of research and technical support facilities for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Basin Agricultural Research Center and the astronomical observatories on Mauna Kea. Additionally, the Wailani Project District was approved in 2004 and is situated to the North (mauka) of subject property. As these urban type uses are located within the area, the urbanization of the project site will not contribute towards scattered urban development and be generally compatible with the surrounding area. The reclassification action would conform to the following goals, objectives and/or policies of the housing element articulated in the Hawai`i State Plan. The request would be consistent with the following goals, objectives and/or policies articulated in the Hawai`i State Plan as it will provide greater opportunities for Hawai`i's families to secure reasonably priced, safe and liveable housing located in suitable environments in areas in which housing has become scarce and costly. • Seek to use marginal or non-essential agricultural land and public land meet housing needs of low and moderate-income and gap-group households. • Effectively accommodate the housing needs of Hawai`i's people. • Stimulate and promote feasbile approaches that increase housing choises for low-income, moderate-income and gap-group households. • Promote design and location of housing developments taking into account the physical setting, accessibility to public facilities and services, and other concerns of existing communities and surrounding areas. Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the policies outlined in the Hawai`i State Plan. The properties have no severe geological or topographical problems which cannot be properly rectified, or which would render the land unusable. According to the Department of Public Works —Engineering Division, the subject parcel is in an area Maile David, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai i Page 5 designated as Zone X on the Flood Insurnace Rate Map (FIRM) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Zone X is an area determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain. All development-generated runoff will be disposed of on site and not directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study will be prepared and recommended drainage system will be constructed meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works. All earthwork activity, including grading and grubbing, will conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentation Control, of the Hawai`i County Code. Any improvements to the subject property must comply with Chapter 27 of the Hawai`i County Code, relating to Floodplain Management. Thus, the reclassification meets the standard which states that the lands included within the urban district, "...shall be those with satisfactory topography and drainage and reasonably free from the danger offloods, tsunami and unstable soil conditions and other adverse environmental effects. " While the subject property is located within the State Land Use Agricultural and County's Agricultural (A-la) zoned district, it has been vacant of any uses for several years and is not classified as Important Agricultural Land. The State of Hawai`i Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawai`i (ALISH) Map classifies the subject property as "Unclassified." The Land Use Study Bureau's Overall Master Productivity Rating classifies the property as "D" or "Poor." The U.S.D.A. Soil Survey classifies the soils within the subject property as Keaukaha Series, Keaukaha extremely rocky muck with 6 to 20 percent slopes. The soil consists of well-drained thin organic soils overlying pahoehoe lava bedrock. The soil above the lava is rapidly permeable. The pahoehoe lava is very slowly permeable but water runs rapidly through the cracks. Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is slight. The Hawai`i Right to Farm Act, HRS Chapter 165, was enacted to protect farming operations on land in the State Land Use Agricultural District when adjacent land is reclassified out of the Agricultural District. A condition of approval will require the applicant to notify prospective purchasers, tenants or lessees of the Hawai`i Right to Farm Act. The reclassification of the 9.09-acre area from the Agricultural to Urban State Land Use designation will not be detrimental to the reduction of this area from the agricultural land inventory in the County of Hawai`i. Furthermore, an Urban classification would complement the existing and future land use pattern of the surrounding area in view of the urban uses already in existence in close proximity to the subject property. Based on the above, the approval of the State Land Use Boundary Amendment from the Agricultural to the Urban District complements the State Land Use District Regulations and County General Plan and is supportive of the Hawai`i State Plan. Maile David, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i Page 6 The accompanying draft bill to amend the State Land Use Boundary Map is provided for your favorable consideration. Please note the proposed conditions of approval attached to the draft bill. We are enclosing copies of the staff Background, Planning Director's Recommendation, and the Power Point presentation. A draft transcript of the hearing will be provided under separate cover. �S/i7ncerely, John R o Replogie �Z2 Ze 8 HST) John R. Replogle, Chairman Windward Planning Commission LHICDCSLU20-054wpc1 Enclosures cc via email: Keith Kato, Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation(HICDC) Cristina Pineda, Office of Housing and Community Development Department of Public Works Department of Water Supply Jean K. Campbell Esq., Corporation Counsel Bhawai`ilslandCominunityDevelopmentCorporation(H I CDC)SLU.10/5/2021 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HAWAII ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (HICDC) STATE LAND USE DISTRICT BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (SLU 20-000054) HAWAII ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (HICDC) has submitted an application for a State Land Use District Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban for approximately 9.09 acres of land. The property is located at 1450 Mohouli Street, directly west (mauka) of the Mohouli Senior Housing Project and the County of Hawaii Fire Administration Support Complex, approximately 1,600 feet west from the Mohouli Street and Komohana Street intersection, Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawai`i, TMK: (3) 2-4-001:168. PROPOSED ACTION 1. Applicants' Request: The applicant is requesting a State Land Use District Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban for 9.09 acres of land, which is the future site of the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project. (Planning Department Exhibit 1 —State Land Use Boundary Amendment(15-acres or less) Application dated October 23, 2020) 2. Objectives of the Requests: The applicant is requesting a State Land Use District Boundary Amendment to develop 90-units of affordable housing which aims to provide afforable housing and related services on a parcel in South Hilo, which were made available by the Govenor's Executive Order No. 4531. The applicant will be submitting an application to the County of Hawai`i Office of Housing and Community Development to obtain exemptions from zoning code requirements, pursuant to HRS 201H-38 of the Hawai`i Revised Statues which will need to be approved by County County via resolution for the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project. 3. Construction Timetable Construction of the proposed affordable housing project is anticipated to begin in early2022 and be completed bythe end of 2023. The completion A g p P of the full project will be dependent on funding availabiliy and is expected to be completed by 2024. The total cost of the proposed project is estimated at $30 to $40 million. -1- 4. Landowner: The landowner is the State of Hawai`i. Effective April 7, 2017, the subject 9.091-acre property was set aside by Section 171-11, Hawai`i Revised Statutes under the Govenor's Executive Order No. 4531 for the public purpose of elderly and/or affordable rental housing and related purposes, to be under the control and management of the County of Hawai`i, identified as the Mohouli Heights Senior Housing Site. (Planning Department Exhibit 2—Governor's Executive Order No. 4531). The Hawai`i Island Community Development Corporation is the lessee of the land to implement the project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 5. Environmental Review: The use of County lands or funds requires compliance with Chapter 343, Hawai`i Revised Statutes regarding Environmental Impact Statements. To comply with this requirement, a Final Environmental Assessment and Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) declaration (Planning Department Exhibit 3- FEA/FONSI) was published in the October 8, 2021 bulletin of the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development's Environmental Review Program. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 6. State Land Use Designation: Agricultural. 7. County Zoning: A-la. 8. General Plan LUPAG Map: Medium Density Urban. These are areas of village and neighborhood commercial and single-family and multiple-family residential (up to 35 units per acre) and related functions. 9. Hilo Community Development Plan (CDP): The Hilo CDP, adopted as Planning Commission Resolution No. 1 on May 21, 1975, identifies the property for agricultural purposes. 10. Special Management Area (SMA): The Special Management Area(SMA) is a part of the Coastal Zone Management Program and regulated by the County. The project site is located over 1.4 miles from the shoreline and is not situated within the SMA. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES AND SURROUNDING AREA 11. Subject Property: The slightly trapezoidal shaped 9.09-acre subject property is located west from the Komohana Street and Mohouli Street intersection, at approximately 300- foot elevation above sea level gradually sloping downwards towards Komohana Street. The subject property is vacant and covered with vegetation. -2- 12. Surrounding Zoning/Land Uses: Surrounding properties are zoned A-la, RM-4, RM-3, and RS-10. The adjacent single-family residential district includes the Sunrise Ridge Subdivision to the northeast which is zoned RS-10. The Sunrise Estates Subdivision is immediately north and west of the subject property on lands zoned A-la. The Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood is located adjacent to the subject property to the east. Further south across Mohouli Street is a 267-acre undeveloped property zoned A-la owned by the State of Hawai`i. Properties to the east across Komohana Street and along Mohouli Street are zoned RS-10 and consist of single-family dwellings. Undeveloped lands further north were rezoned in 2004 to the Wailani Project District. 13. Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH): Unclassified. 14. Land Study Bureau's Detailed Land Classification System: "D" or"Poor." 15. U.S.D.A. Soil Survey: The property is classififed as Keaukaha Series, Keaukaha extremely rocky muck with 6 to 20 percent slopes (rKFD) and Pahoehoe lava flows (rLW)by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil Survey, U.S. Soil Conservation Service 1973. The Keaukaha soil series consists of well- drained thin organic soils overlying pahoehoe lava bedrock. The soil above the lava is rapidly permeable. The pahoehoe lava is very slowly permeable but water runs rapidly through the cracks. Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is slight. 16. Flood Zone: The subject parcel is in an area designated as Zone X on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Zone X is an area determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain. 17. Flora/Fauna Resources: According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in the 2021 Environmental Assessment, the federally threatened Newell's shearwater, Hawaiian petrel, Hawaiian hoary bat and the Hawaiian hawk have all been observed in the project vicinity. The USFWS stated that outdoor lighting can result in seabird disorientation, fallout and injury or mortality. There is no federally designated critical habitat located in the vicinity of the project. According to USFWS,potential impacts to seabirds can be minimized by: 1) shielding outdoor lights associated with the project, particularly when used during each year's peak fledging period(September 15 through December 15); 2) avoiding night-time construction; and 3)providing all project staff with information regarding seabird fallout. To avoid impacts to the endangered Hawaiian -3- hoary bat, woody plants suitable for bat roosting should not be removed or trimmed during the bat birthing and pup rearing season(April to August). If this avoidance measure cannot be implemented, a bat survey should be conducted and, if this species is found, USFWS should be contacted for further assistance. 18. Archaeological/Historic/Cultural Resources: In a letter dated January 15, 2021, the State of Hawai`i Department of Land and Natural Resources-Historic Preservation Division accepted the Archaeological Assessment prepared by Haun(Haun 2008; Archaeological Assessment, Portion of TMK: (3)2-4-001:168, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai`i). The survey covered the subject property. No historic sites were found during the survey. There is no evidence of any traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the site, nor existence of any known valued cultural, historical or native resources in the area. 19. Public Access: There is no known record of a designated public access to the shoreline or mountain areas that traverse the property. 20. Traffic: AECOM completed a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) for the project in November 2020 (Planning Department Exhibit 4- TIAR). The TIAR analyzed the impacts of the proposed 90-unit housing development. The TIAR concluded that the proposed project will generate 48 a.m. peak hour trips and 68 p.m. peak hour trips and that the proposed driveways will operate at acceptable levels of service for all traffic movements during peak hours for a 5-year forecast. The TIAR also concluded that the traffic at the study intersections under the 5-year extrapolation will not be caused by the project, but by the expected increase in background traffic in the area. The applicant analyzed the impacts of the new, 90-unit affordable rental housing development on three (3) intersections: 1) Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place(project access at Mohouli Street); 2) Mohouli Street/Komohana Street; and Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street. The TIAR recommended the implementation of a right-in/right-out driveway on Mohouli Street and restriping part of the wide paved shoulder on westbound Mohouli Street as a right-turn only lane. Furthermore, the applicant is proposing full-movement access from Kupuna Place to the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development by way of easement over TMK: 2-4- 001:176. The December 29, 2020 memo, from the Department of Public Works (DPW) recommends that the applicant will install streetlights and traffic control devises as may -4- be required by the DPW Traffic Division. According to the applicant, in 2013 the applicant contributed $500,000 to the Department of Public Works to install traffic signals for the intersection of Kupuna Place and Mohouli Street. 21. Waiakea Pond/Alenaio Stream/Waiakea Stream: The Waiakea Pond is the closest body of water to the proposed project area, situated downstream approximately 1 %2 miles northeast from the subject property. The nearby Alenaio Stream is located approximately 1,500 feet to the north and the Waiakea Stream is located 3,000 feet to the south and downslope of the subject property. According to the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli FEA, the proposed project is not expected to have any direct impact on any streams, wetlands, aquifer resource or marine waters. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 22. Access: Access to the subject property is proposed from Kupuna Place by way of an easement over the adjacent parcel TMK: (3) 2-4-001:176 and Mohouli Street, both County roadways. Kupuna Place is a two-lane paved roadway with an existing pavement width of 32 feet within a 50 feet wide right-of-way. Mohouli Street is classified as a major collector road with an existing pavement width of 80 feet. 23. Water: County water is available to the property via a 12-inch waterline running within Mohouli Street and a 12-inch waterline running within Kupuna Place. Finally, the Department of Water Supply(DWS) indicated that the existing 12-inch waterline within Mohouli Street and Kupuna Place is adequate to provide the required 2,000 gallons per minute flow for fire protection, as per DWS Water System Standards. 24. Wastewater: The applicant will connect to the County sewer system, which is available along Kahikini Street in the adjacent subdivision to the north via easements along TMKs: (3) 2-4-001:176 and 2-4-001:177. 25. Solid Waste: The applicant indicated that the solid waste generated by the proposed project will be disposed at appropriate sites designated by the Department of Environmental Management. 26. Essential Utilities and Services: Electricity, cable and telephone are available to the site. Police, fire protection and emergency medical services are located in Hilo within two miles from the property. -5- AGENCIES' COMMENTS 27. Department of Public Works-Engineering Division (Planning Department Exhibit 5 —December 29, 2020 Memo). 28. Department of Water Supply(Planning Department Exhibit 6—December 30, 2020 Memo). • 29. Department of Environmental Management(Planning Department Exhibit 7— December 16, 2020 Memo). 30. Fire Department(Planning Department Exhibit 8—December 16,2020 Memo). 31. State Department of Health (Planning Department Exhibit 9—March 8, 2021 Memo). 32. State Department of Land and Natural Resources—State Historic Preservation Division (Planning Department Exhibit 10—January 15, 2021 Memo). 33. State Department of Land and Natural Resources—Division of Forestry and Wildlife(Planning Department Exhibit 11 —January 12, 2021 Memo). 34. State Department of Land and Natural Resources—Engineering Division (Planning Department Exhibit 12—December 23, 2020 Memo). 35. State Department of Land and Natural Resources—Commission on Water Resource Management (Planning Department Exhibit 13—January 7, 2021 Memo). 36. U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service (Planning Department Exhibit 14-December 23, 2020 Memo). AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS—NO COMMENT/CONCERNS 37. Police Department; Office of Housing and Community Development; State Land Use Commission; Office of Planning; Depaituient of Agriculture. PUBLIC COMMENTS 38. None as of this writing. -6- iSI_AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION STREET, SUITE 204 HILO, HAWAII 96720 October Q 2020 Mr. Michael 'tee ['Laming Director I land Delivered Subject: State and Use boundary Amendment Request Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable I lousinu Project Tax Map Key: 2-4-00 : 168 We are pleased to submit this application for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment for ow- Pocket Neighborhood Project. We believe that this will he a iwod land use concept and most appropriate for this setting. We NV111 be seeking funding through the Low Income Housing Tax Credits (UHT() program in April. The Low Income 1-10116111P, TLx Credits are awarded through a statewide competitive process so it is critical that the project be consistent with the land use requirements at the time of the application. To this end we hope that this application can be approved by the end of March to meet that deadline. We will also be submitting a 201 H application through 014CD shortly. We have elected to go through the 2011-I process as we will need exceptions to parts of the Zoning. Subdivision, and Sewers Codes, including the conversion of the zoning from A-la to RM-4. Enclosed are the filing tee and other requirements listed on the. State Land Use Boundary Amendthent Application form. If you or your staff have any questions please call me at 957-6750 or email keith.hicdc( gmail.com. Sincerely. Keith Kato Executive Director SC i* ED I 3 7 0 4 8 QCT 2 2 Plr: /4 ' AN EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY Planninb Dept. ...EQUAL OPPQRTONITY EMpLOYEA- ADMINISTRATION:OM)968-1158 Exhibit I FAX(8O8).935- 916 . . • STATE LAND USE: V,OliNDARY ANI ENDA!!ENT APPLICATION 1-1:5 !\( R 9 1I I.F ) COUNTY OF LAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT (rype or Ie!!,ibly prim the requested inforivaiion) PETITIONER: Hawaii island Community Development Corporation 8, 2020 PETITIONER'S SIGNATURE: u/c/k, 4t( DATE; ADDRESS: 100 100 Pauahi Street Suite 201 Hilo, Hawaii 967 20 PETITIONER'S INTEREST IF NOT OWNER: Lessee TELEPHONE:(Bus.) 808-3 19-2422 (Res.) (Fax) 808=969-1158 LANDOWNER(S): State of Hawaii Executive Order 4531 Transfer to County of Hawaii LANDOWNER SIGN:\TURD:S.): DATE: -October 6,2020 by letn4) ADDRESS: 99 Aupuni Street, Hawaii 96720 TAX MAP KEY: (3) 2-4-001: 168 STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Nohouli Street, Hilo Hawaii 96720 ZONING: Ag-1 Acre• SIZE OF PROPERTY: 9.09 Acre CURRENT STATE LAND USE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION: Agriculture • REQUESTED STATE LAND USE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION: Urban AGENT: ADDRESS: TELEPTIONE(Rus.) (Res ) (Fax)- , Please indicate to whorl original correspondence and copies should bc sent. ORIGINAL: Anil-cant COPIES: .. • (See Instructions on Reverse Side) COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT REQUEST HAWAII ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION HILO, HI 96720 TMK: (3) 2-4-001: 168 • 1 T nb1e of Conic•nt:.+ i. INTRODUCTION ,. . .. .. . .4 PROJECT LOCATION III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION • 5 A. The Pocket Neighborhooci Concept 5 B. Project Timetable and Cost 6 V. INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS 6 A. State Land Use 6 B. County General Plan 6 C. County Zoning . , 7 i E. Relationship to SMA 7 F, Other Permitting Requirements 7 ' V. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS 7 A. General Description 7 B. Soils and Topography 8 C. Natural Hazards ,8 D. Flora/Fauna 9 E. Historic/Cultural/Archaeological Resources 10 F. Valued Cultural Resources -10 G. Water and Coastal Resources 10 H. Noise, Air Quality, and Dust 10 I. Scenic and Visual Considerations 11 VI. SOCIAL AND RELATED CONSIDERATIONS 11 A. Surrounding Land Uses 11 B. Economic Impacts 12 C. Agricultural Impacts 12 VII. INFRASTRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS 12 A. Roads 12 C. Wastewater 13 D. Solid Waste 13 E. Other Government Services 14 F. Other Utilities 14 VIII. IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS 14 2 A Relationship Betlrveen Local Short-Term Uses of Environment and Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity ...... ..... .... .. . .. . . 't4 B. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources C. Mitigative Measures 15 D. Alternatives to the Proposed Project 15 IX. REGULATORY ANALYSIS 16 A. General Plan LUPAG Map 16 B. General Plan Polices 16 X. CONCLUSION 20 Figures (follows page) 1. Location Map 5 2. Land Use Concept Plan 6 3. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) 9 Exhibits (follows page 20) A. Archaeological Field Inspection Report 3 . ^ • i INTRODUCTION The Hawaii Island Corhnounity Development Corporation ("applicant") is .requesting a State Land Use District Boundary amendment for a 9.091-acre parcel in VVaiake8. South Hilo, Hawaii from Aoricuitukat0 Urban. The property is located off Mohouli Street approximately 1`600 feet southwest of its intersection with Komohana Street (Figure 1). The applicant intends develop the site as a Pocket Neighborhood" development with small scale residential units surrounding common areas to create a sense of community within the clusters and a central commons area to be ejoyed all the entire development. The applicant plans to retain a buffer between the adjacent residential lots with a minimum width of thirty feet and comprised largely of retained able trees, Residences adjacent to the 1-acre lotsalong the northern and western sides of the property will be single story structures with higher densities and heights provided along the eastern (makai) and southern (Mohouli) portions of the site. In the central portion of the site the community center will be the social focus of the development. The residential development will be a mix or 1, 2 and possibly 3 bedroom units The specific building type and unit mixhave not yet been established and the overall unit count will not exceed that allowed by the County zoning. All units will be affordable for residents whose household income does not exceed 140% of the islands median income. A family of four at 140% of the median income in 2020 will have an income of$116,620 per year. Since 1991, The Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) has been providing affordable housing for families on Hawaii Island. Their mission is to assist low and moderate-incothe residents of the County to secure affordable housing. date, HICDC has developed 732 affordable homes on the Big Island. These homes are a mix a single family and multi-family units and are roughly balanced between home Ownership and rental units. For this pject fee simple sales is not allowed, hoyvEwe[ leasehold ownership is being considered along with rental units. 4 II. PROJECT LOCATION • As noted earlier, the subject property is located off Mohouli Street approximately 1;600 feet southwest of its intersection with Komohana Street. Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii (Figure 1). III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. The Pocket Neighborhood Concept Pocket Neighborhoods grew out of the work of Ross Chapin and his colleagues, but the idea is beyond any one person or style. It is pattern of housing that fosters a strong sense of community among nearby neighbors, while preserving their need for privacy. Examples can be found across the spectrum, from small towns, to suburbs to urban areas. Pocket neighborhoods are clustered groups of neighboring houses or apartments gathered around a shared open space —a garden courtyard, a pedestrian street, a series of joined backyards, or a reclaimed alley —all of which have a clear sense of territory and shared stewardship. They can be in urban, suburban or rural areas. These are settings where nearby neighbors can easily know one another, where empty nesters and single householders with far-flung families can find friendship or a helping hand nearby, and where children can have shirttail aunties and uncles just beyond their front gate. For this project the clusters will be arranged around a central community area where gathering spaces, mail pick up, and service opportunities will be housed. Also -included will be an open recreational space and a covered space modeled on the Cooper Center in Volcano. See Figure 2. 5 - ��- / i ' . ` . . '0,-;------ ,,G\"e .,,i/ f,_'-_, _-\-cP.."-.7./.1.`‘,'/ /-*C-n/C \--->.-_?%<__, __, '_..)_.?1:3---X '''. ).,.\'''''''\''71,,,,,,,. t'=.--"j'i\ r i II I'v IV t 41.8 A.' ,..' ',...'4'C' '',N C'-'33' sl" i '' i 1.• ‘. 00)\• :1'1'-'..-'7'' ''-- _ ,--., 1 c' c...:\ \ \ ,, V.:\ :". - , ''''''' '1'...q.) 6. 444,*40440'..154;;2.6.40.7,..,‘5'E \t ‘ - ,..,,, ,,-;.,,, ..,..1\19.,..\-.‘•,,,,,,,,c,,, _ ‘,,,,,, \.e"1::...I P.'II\;":,,,,i):,,i7...,,5_,9,4..,,,,,,,;,,,,,1__.,,&' ..e,-i,.,1,,,:,..,..,,,(.,.i.::::/74.:.:.,,,,,,,,,\,,,,,,,;-'14.2,,,...,,,,,,..„---t.:::,.::;,:s.c,s,...\s„,\:...::::\,,,,,,, lz;,,,, ,..,,,,,,,:.,:,51„1,(H,..„..,;:,,,\,. \_.‘,.._c____\\\\.___:_,LI:Ti.t..":11,:;)„,.,.:.,..1'1.ii\t,";.:.-‘1.1.,,,s.,..,.,,,_...;e://.iiit..._..._:.-•48..._.,,,.., ...it.".17;f1,7,.;._...,t_.,_.....,_...._-,,,,,. - _______:....,x/H,. / .) , I -‘. ,, _..-,-') ..,--4..,. I - .2.-'..\.,, .,„:\-c..,,,...,,..:..,\\‘.1::::.•..,\.,'.'.:\,:,,,,.\_;„\...,,,-::.,',. ,.\\\,.,,,,.\,11:.,, - , _ ~ �� • ~~ ^ ~~~ . AUL.4....) �.,u.� - � �� (Tar. � -7.,:,- 't � . = - ,�' �� — | L_ -� U -- ��a� I ~~"= / =°'°" ° *�/ °� ' ~ /^ q ' / r-r--- - - PLAT ° .~| nm ==� °' '^^^' "F—`~ PLA �/ � ' |-1—� tap. \// . A |' �o» �/ �— •:'' / . v o ' x o �~ ^ r , � []742 FIGURE I: IOCATlON8I&P ~ ''"--��.�� - '_- _ Z .c^ms^vnnww�^a,*m^°L�*""°n ' FOR PROPERTY xSsr Su[uT mnp:ncS Somcc7 TO CHANGE ___ _ PM--__'-_` _ --_-_. -__'__--- '. ________ __ _ -_- .-_ __ _. �__ -__ -__ _ _ - ' . • - B. Project Timetable and Cost The applicant hopes to secure State Land Use Boundary Amendment and a 201 H zoning exception approval as soon as possible and begin development of the project. It is anticipated that funding applications will be submitted starting in fail of 2020 and continuing forward. Should the requested tax credits be approved in June 2021 construction of the first phase will commence in early 2022 and be completed by the end of 2023. The completion of the full project will be dependent on funding availability but is expected to be completed by 2024. Cost estimates are very preliminary as the availability of funding will determine the unit count and the mix of unit types. It is estimated that at full build out the project will cost $30 million to $40 million. IV. INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS A. State Land Use The subject site is designated State Land Use Agriculture. Concurrently with this request, a State Land Use Boundary. Amendment application is being submitted to change the SLU • designation from Agriculture to Urban. Based on the size of the area of requested rezoning (9.091 acres), no State Land Use Commission action is required. The County of Hawaii can process the rezoning • request. A discussion of the extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to the applicable district standards is required for the State Land Use Boundary Amendment and is found in the Boundary Amendment application submitted concurrently with this application. B. County General Plan The County General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide .("LUPAG') map designates the subject site as Medium Density Urban. This designation identifies land for residential use with community and public uses, and neighborhood and convenience-type commercial uses; overall residential density may be up to thirty Five (35) units per acre. 6 • ,+ -t,„,,• , ,,,,,,tp...-4,....,k,,''''1,-„-,,! ,,,, r - , — -•,•••. '• 4 ' '''' f 'fii."'i4. '2.f:' ,. 7'..;'''''' - " - -4" ,•• • : - ai'f, , . .„..,,,, . '''.:-'-'7,,,t'J ''„g,' •,,,,e ,.. -;;;..31' '' , .4t I,'7:7''',A,= ,..,. r "., 4.,•• ,,' 4t,!„:,•4441--->X - ''.,,74,f;;”0.•, - .,•'' • .- , •*t 4- .". • ,-',,,e4 •°„' 4 ••_ '''''-'14 'lit.' .j. - '-:. ' — . ". ''-' /-•;,..i „41-P ., ,1,„.,,,.4„, ,k,,„„ • +O.t.: +,-,.. . r. 4 4 / 04 1 ,.... ., -- . ki.k "'•-'— . '-, k, . , „I 7.- I- i t •-'' • - . , - , ''. - .a,. .' '" t ' '.- ., -..,..y .\ 1"§"4, ""'''' it‘,.$ * , i \ -l'•' - ' cbi. „„. „: tt° - i \, \ \ \ . 1.1,--••• -,;4' 1 i E \\ ' , -,-, . , .:.'•••••01,', 1, ,','!.,i'S \ f.A t, ,, ./... 1,4,y,,, 7., • , 8 ...i. ' 0,--. ..-7-. ,,t ‘,;,., t„,„., ',„5,,,,, ;.%”- 1 :r',1/ ' 4 1,-11' ..„,,d ,-.:",,-.." ;..• =. , , ..-,,'-• , f ' . ',I:%,4.,-, 4 ',gf•-.', ,'t t 7-, e•-, 1 -4 , . .., l'•,;-"/:•:' s .,,,,,:,, . , ,,,,.. \ ,..„...., ,„,,..., , , ,.. , 4,,,,,,,, ,„,,,.. ,,,,:,: ,,,,:, 1 \ '• \ ,,\ , ) ; - I „- ,,t.',',„ ,.,,.t.06.-, •i., 1' '!:'°'. - :-.:‘,,: ., f ' -..., - ,• , 1$ -",„,•. *,.4„4, .,, .. I! • , • , , .... •,• • _ SK ..—.... • \ „D' • - , : , ,, _______--/-7,,, _ .,„ ... ,„,,,„„„,;:f.:.-.••;-t\,. u ----s;› '3..,.-4 t...3..,411i ' _ -, 1 r„. ,..,44,.; ., , . , , - ..,JA .T., ; .._,_. iti.",.• 'A 4 # , , _ , ,..• . . • •,-", \ _"" 1 4.,..", ,,,"•., , : • 'V•- ' ' ._ 1 1 . . • , - -- . p. , : ,., . . i• . . 1 • i - 1 . 1 , \ ---\ N .-----"---' - f , 1-- :• _ . t \ .- I. • ' ,..- ‘,..",\ \ -+.4 "k '-i;. , - A ' \ ..,.. , \\ ,,. ... -:.. v, , , -- .. , '.. . ,...,::.' '\,. , . \ , . ,.,. , \,.. ,,. . . , _ .. .. , .• \ „,- 1,,ti, ‘ _ .... .r•All 8 October 2010 • • Pl 1 .0 : I 4 ,. 44 . HALE OLA 0 MOHOULROSS GRAFIN 1 los? Use Dtoram , [ The proposed deveopment resulting in no more than ninety (90) dwelling units or less than 10 units per acre and would be consistent with the M,edfiurn-Density Urban designation. No General Plan amendment would be required to effectuate this project T Additionally, the affordable housing component is needed in this area and should further underscore the viability of this request. C. County Zoning The County zoning of the subject property is Agriculture (A-1a). The majority of the surrounding properties are zoned A-la and RS-1U. The large parcels to the south controlled by the University of Hawaii — Hilo are zoned A-1 a. The applicant will be filing a 201H request with OHCD to bring the zoning to RM-4 and to eliminate the need for loading zones within the project site. E. Relationship to SMA The site is located approximately 1.7 miles from the coastline and outside the County Special Management Area (SMA). No SMA Use Permit is required F. Other Permitting Requirements As noted earlier, other permits would still be required. First, a State Land Use Boundary Amendment would have to be granted and is being submitted herein Other permits would be of the "ministerial" variety, such as Subdivision Approval, Building Permits, Grading, etc. V. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS A. General Description The parcel is generally trapezoidal in shape and is accessed via Mohouli Street, which is a Countyowned and maintained paved access road with a 80-foot average right-of-way and 80-foot average pavement width. There are currently no structures on the subject • parcel. The site is situated at the 345 to 360-foot elevation level. The property slopes from west to east with a gradual decline. There does not 7 appear to be any topographic constraint in developing and utilizing the site for residential use There are homes on the adjacent 1 acre size lots along Kukuau Street The general area is primarily residential. The adjacent site to the east is planned for Fire Department use. Further to the east is the Mohouli Senior complex which includes 182 senior rental apartments and the Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Adult Day Center. Across Mohouli Street to the south is vacant land controlled by the University of Hawaii — Hilo. The annual median rainfall for this area is approximately 120 inches The average daily temperature ranges from 64 degrees to 77 degrees Fahrenheit. Wind patterns are generally easterly during the day and westerly during the evenings. B. Soils and Topography The subject parcel is located entirely o the 1880-1881 Hilo Lava Flow The young lava and little soil development on the subject parcel is unsuitable for farming or even grazing and has remained undeveloped. The property is covered with Keaukaha extremely rocky muck 2-10% slopes. The Keaukaha soil series consists of well drained thin organic soils overlying pahoehoe lava bedrock. The Agricultural Capability Subclass rating for this soils is VI's which includes soils having very severe limitations that make the unsuited for cultivation and that restrict their use largely to pasture or range, woodland or wildlife. As noted earlier, the topography of the site slopes in a west to east direction with an average grade of 1 7 percent. C. Natural Hazards 1. Drainage The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate map (Figure 3) (FIRM) identifies the project area as Zone "X" (areas outside of the 500-year flood). There are no identified existing drainage ways on the site 8 Pursuant to County drainage requirements. appropriate drywell and/or similar means to capture runoff from any improvements will be built if necessary. in conjunction with the development of the property 2. Volcanic, Earthquake and Tsunami Hazards According to the United States Geological Survey maps, the project site is located within Lava Flow Hazard Zone 3. on a scale of ascending risks 9 to 1. The Building Code designates the entire Island of Hawaii Earthquake Zone "U and contains certain structural requirements to address the relative seismic hazard. All structures would have to comply with this standard. 3. Tsunami Hazard As the site is located 1 7 miles from the ocean and sits at the 350 to 365-foot elevation, it is located outside of the Civil Defense's Tsunami Evacuation Zone. D. Flora/Fauna The vegetation on the site is relatively thick and is dominated by guava saplings and scattered ohi'a with an understory of uluhe. introduced species typical of disturbed roadsides are present along Mohouli Street. The suburban nature of the surrounding areas would make it less likely to find endangered animal life in this area. It would be possible to find the Island-wide ranging Hawaiian Hawk ('lo), Hawaiian Owl (Pueo), Hawaiian Goose (Nene), and the Hawaiian Hoary Bat on site, however this is not their main habitat In addition, introduced bird species (such as dove, Japanese White- eye, house finch, myna) are common in this area Domestic animals such as cats and dogs, and other animals like rats. pigs and mongoose are also common. These are all common and not endangered. As such, it is unlikely that the development of the subject property would cause any adverse faunal impacts. 9 10/6/2020 Flood Hazard Assessment Tool %11114,66-.4 Search for an address or location f w • 3 .x< '°°F — ;u. ::...,. y -r.-:.,-,:::::.'� 3ve a ",ea„ � ' z y ,,,,,, - _ ,,' - ,:f Ift -' 101°1i4r:,„, , -.-ti-.4,-,.,ii'dil:i.:,-„,, , s r • w _ + " - ,x"' § .fid' .� �� ._,,:t- ^" a ., �}C a • •'ice , N�"_,_. �:�, 1 a-. -b 4 ° �aM f � '.-1,,,.. yam» Air4,....„... . "a " M,� ,, . �,.:1:.--,,,,;,4,1,.."5., n 3" '- -mac t _,,, „ ,_-_,:•_.„,,, „ �, :::-" ....tom yfx�” : +- :1',,t14. �� ° v,�, � � -�q�.. �' '� '�;:1C;�,..` _ ..„,.. _„ ,,,, ,,„:- „ .,_,...,,,,,, _ _.„,_ „,.. . 4;1' ' ,...t',,,;,,, ''''';.-..44,_ , - ”' , —"P'-: ',''',r.At;-''''t.ff: -I; ' *. it r 1 '-,L, � "� " ,. ',..?..;i-V'V''''' ' ,, •ate ,' „' .` " k� .£. am y w, �. ' - x - a r�. w '� LONF' X it k 3. z: a t � -.. .... �nlcri nrenen. __„...z -. gis.hawaiinfip.org/FHAT/ E. Historic/Cultural/Archaeological Resources An Archaeological Field Inspection of the subject property was conducted on July 29, 2020 by ASM Affiliates. (Exhibit B). No historical properties of any kind were observed. However, in the event . any inadvertent discoveries are made during any land disturbance activity relating to this project, work will cease and the applicant will immediately notify the Planning Department and the State DLNR and secure their clearances before proceeding further. F. Valued Cultural Resources It is not known whether the subject or immediate surrounding area was used in the recent past for the gathering of plants by Native Hawaiians. The applicant has not observed any evidence of Native Hawaiians gathering plants on the site or the adjoining properties. Thus, it would appear unlikely that the site would serve such purpose today. Based on the above, it does not appear that the project would have any potential adverse impact relative to the cultural and historical resources of the area. G. Water and Coastal Resources • The subject site is located approximately 1.7 miles from the coastline and sits at approximately 350 to 365-foot elevation. There should be no coastal impacts resulting from discharge of wastewater systemsas the project will tie into the county sewer system. Further: being a non- coastal property, no coastal access will be affected. H. Noise, Air Quality, and Dust Mohouli Street will provide access to the proposed subdivision. Access within the housing project will be provided by private roadways and driveways. • The existing ambient traffic level in this area should not be significantly impacted with the addition of this residential. Traffic noise from Mohouli Street adjacent to the property will remain the dominant source of traffic noise. As such, the corresponding noise level should remain the same, 10 • • There may, however. be short-term noise and air quality impacts associated with the construction of the infrastructure as well as the vertical construction. In that event. contractors will be required to comply with appropriate noise and related mitigation measures of the State Department of Health. The proposed development should not generate any direct long-term air quality impacts. The,only discernible air quality impact could be associated with the vehicular traffic to and from the site. While there will be an impact to the ambient air quality, the impact should not be • significant. Especially considering higher EPA standards for automobile air emissions, the air quality impact should be negligible. With the exception of construction dust associated with the required infrastructure of any future dwellings, the short and long-term dust • generated by the project should be reasonable. Construction dust, however, like construction noise will have to comply with the State Department of Health's regulations. Scenic and Visual Considerations In,the Natural Beauty element of the General Plan, there are sites or areas listed as being a scenic resource. The subject site is not listed as a scenic site, nor will the proposed rezoning and subdivision action affect any of the scenic resources outlined in the General Plan. Views of any other scenic sites from surrounding roads would not be affected, due to the level topography of the site. VI. SOCIAL AND RELATED CONSIDERATIONS A. Surrounding Land Uses The existing land use in this area is a mix of vacant land and residential development. Given the existing conditions, the proposed development would represent an extension of the existing residential nature of this area. • -Fp mitigate the impacts to the adjacent one acre lots a buffer of a minimum of 30 teet will be maintained along the common boundary lines. This buffer will retain much of the native ohia trees. Residential development along the common property lines with the one acre lots will be limited to single story 11 iiflt'z.tiUit: #I1 i'.1111;_ iif"1i�i :lt:ii:•I{It.'.� I11:.1 ilt.'I�_ iil� '•.`,Ili Ilr,.• �,.,rt� lt1•t:d i':�t!n tft \1,ti,culil trr_.t .i I i mhei prorkert. lire '•. B. Economic Impacts The requested State Land Use Boundary Amendment would have some measure of economic impact. The construction of the project will generate short-term economic benefits including construction jobs, purchases from local suppliers and services. More significant is the long term benefit of adding more affordable housing to the Hilo community. Such.housing reduces the cost of living for the residents while providing quality living spaces. This will help with the cost of living for the residents. C. Agricultural Impacts Given the nearby poor soil quality and nearby residential land uses a rezoning of the site to residential use will not detract from the agricultural potential of the region. VII. INFRASTRUCTURAL-CONSIDERATIONS A. Roads Access to the project would be through Kupuna Place by way of an easement over the adjacent parcel TMK: 2-4-1: 176 end a right turn in and right turn out access point off of Mohouli Street. Kupuna Place is a County owned and maintained roadway with a right-of-way of 50 feet with 32 feet of pavement and sidewalks of both sides. Mohouli Street is owned by the County and has a right of way and pavement width of 80 feet. The easement over TMK: 2-4-1: 176 has been agreed to by the County of Hawaii and its documentation is in process. • This access plan was recommended by the Traffic Division over a proposed single access point from the subject property onto Mohouli . Street. This later approach would create an additional left turn point • on Mohouli Street which would further disrupt the traffic traveling on Mohouli Street. • 12 •• it should be noted that in 2013 the County required hie developer of the Mohouli Phase 1 project to deposit S500,000 for the purpose of purchasing the equipment for traffic signals at the intersection of Kupuna Place and Mohouli Street. It was understood at that time that DPVV would install the equipment so purchased with those funds. To date those funds have not yet been expended to the applicant's knowledge. A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared by AECOM in 2011 and focused on the traffic that would be carried on Kupuna Place from 150 residential units, the adult day center and through the second of three phases of the Fire Department complex on TMK: 2-4-1: 176. At that time it was assumed that the Kupuna Place entry onto Mohouli Street would remain stop controlled. B. Water • A request for a water commitment has been submitted to the Department of Water Supply. This request is currently under review. The DWS noted that the water use by the Mohouli 1, 2 and 3 projects is less than projected and DWS is evaluating the current request against that background. Should DWS indicate that at this time less than 90 water units would be available the project Will be phased to limit the initial development to the number of units DWS could support. C. Wastewater The Hale Ola 0 Mohouli residential project will connect to the county sewer system through easements across TNIK 2-4-1:176 and 2-4-1: 177. Connection to the county system will be at the county owned manhole on parcel 177. D. Solid Waste Solid waste will be handled through commercial haulers or the individual homeowners into authorized landfill sites or transfer stations. With the requested SLU Boundary Amendment, the potential . • for uses with toxic or related chemical waste would be minimal, if at a11. • • 13 E. Other Government Services As this property is a part of the City of Hilo, no extension of government services would be required. There is a Fire Station. Police Station, Public School. Library and a gas station all located within 3 to 5 miles of the subject site. In addition, there are recreation facilities in the general area. As such, the project should not result in the extension of any government services and the required public facilities are located reasonably proximate to the subject site. F. Other Utilities All other utilities such as cable, telephone and electrical services are available to the site. VIII. IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS A. Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of Environment and Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity If the request were denied, the short-term use of the area of the proposed rezoning would probably continue in its unused condition and will not provide additional affordable housing for the residents of Hilo. B. irreversible and irretrievable Commitment of Resources As the site has been relatively disturbed in the past, it is not likely that its development would result in an irreversible commitment of natural or archaeological resources. The soil on the parcel think muck overlying pahoehoe lava from the • 1881 lave flow. The potential for viable commercial agricultural use of the property is very minimal at best. An Archaeological Field Inspection Survey was conducted for the subject property and impacts to archaeological sites are not anticipated 141 • C. EVlitigative Measures The applicant intends to develop the property for residential use. With any construction activity, contractors will be obligated to comply with appropriate State noise and air quality standards. Should unanticipated archaeological finds be discovered in conjunction with any further development of the site, work will stop (as is required by the State and County) and clearance will be secured before work is resumed. There are no identified existing drainage ways on the property, Any and all required grading or grubbing work would be done in conjunction with the required permits. This is to assure that the development of this site does not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties or contribute to erosion or sedimentation. Finally, as the site is undeveloped land there will be no person or businesses to be dislocated by this project. D. Alternatives to the Proposed Project 1. No Project Under the status quo alternative, the site could continue in its idle state. The applicant would also not be able to develop the • property. Evaluation of Alternatives The project's impacts to the area's social and physical infrastructure would not be pronounced. Certain mitigative measures could be taken to address any possible impacts associated by the development of this project. Further, the project would be consistent with the land use objectives sought to be accomplished by the County General Plan I UPAG map. In view of the aforementioned, it would appear that none of the alternatives would be more prudent and beneficial than the requested RM-4 alternative. 15 IX. REGULATORY ANALYSIS A. General Plan LUPAG Map The General Plan provides for the long-range comprehensive development of the Island of Hawaii. It provides direction for balanced • growth in the County. The LUPAG map designates the site primarily Medium Density Urban. This designation allows the RM-4 zoning without a General Plan amendment. B. General Plan Polices The requested zoning would be consistent with the goals, policies, and standards of the General Plan document. For one, it may provide economic opportunities, from increased employment options and through the construction of any improvements required for the subdivision. The addition of single and multifamily residences will increase the real property values. In doing so, the resultant project should add revenues to the County and State coffers. The project intends to be energy conscious through the use and/or encouragement of solar energy and design features to take advantage of the sun and wind patterns. • Maintaining and improving the quality of the environment is important to the success of this project. The General Plan identifies five (5) areas of environmental concerns - air pollution, water quality, soil pollution, solid waste disposal, and noise pollution. As proposed, the project would not violate any of those objectives. Aside from the very limited vehicular transmission, air pollution associated with the project should be negligible. All wastewater would be put into the county sewer system. Drainage drywells will be 'installed as required as will erosion control measures during construction. This should be sufficient to address any potential surface water, groundwater or coastal water impacts. The archeological survey of the site did not encounter any historic sites. Nonetheless, work will cease if unanticipated archaeological remains are discovered during the development of this project. Work will resume only after proper clearances from the State and/or County have.been received. • 16 While there may have been sightings of the Hawaiian Hawk (•!o) and Hawaiian short-eared owl (Pueo), this area is not their primary habitat. As such, the subject project should not have any significant impacts on rare or endangered plant or animal life in this area. The proposed affordable housing development will help fulfil the • objectives of the'housing element by creating affordable housing options. As the project site is approximately 1.7 miles from the ocean and has an elevation of 350 to 365 feet, coastal resources concerns are notsignricant for this project. There will be no interference with shoreline access. Further, through the use of county sewer system impacts to the coastal water will be minimal. There will be marginal impact to public facilities. Wastewater will be handled by the Hilo sewage system, and the Department of Water Supply water line is adjacent to the site. Vehicular access to the site has been coordinated with the Traffic Division of DPW. The site is readily accessible by emergency vehicles. Schools and other public .facilities are also located proximate to the site, most of them being .less than 2 miles away. Finally, in terms of the Land Use and Housing elements, the pertinent goals, policies, and standards of the General Plan note the following: • • o Designate and allocate land uses in appropriate proportions and mix and in keeping with the social, cultural and physical environments of the County (Land Use Element) Encourage a volume of construction and rehabilitation of housing sufficient to meet growth needs and correct existing deficiencies. (Housing Element) • Aid and encourage the development of a wide variety of housing to achieve a diversity of socio-economic housing mix (Housing Element) o Allocate appropriate requested zoning in accordance with the existing or projected needs of neighborhood, community, region • and County. (Land Use Element) 17 • • O Encourage the development and maintenance of communities meeting the needs of its residents in balance with the physical and social environment (Land Use Element) • O Zoning requests shall be reviewed with respect to General Plan designation, district goals, regional plans, State Land Use District, compatibility with adjacent zoned uses, availability of public services and utilities, access;and public need. D. State Land Use Boundary Amendment • Conformance to Urban District Standards The proposed State Land Use Boundary Amendment conforms to Hawai'i Revised Statutes Chapter 15-15 Section 18 as amended October 11, 2013 in the following ways: It shall include lands characterized by "city-like" concentrations of people, structures, streets, urban level of services and other related land uses; It shall take into consideration the following specific factors: O Proximity to centers of trading and employment except where the development would generate new centers of trading and employment. The subject property is within the developed area of 1-filo. In the immediate vicinity there are hundreds of residential units including areas to the north, and east. m Availability of basic services such as schools, parks, wastewater systems, solid waste disposal, drainage, water transportation systems, public utilities, and police and fire protection; and sufficient reserve areas for foreseeable urban growth. • As this area is part of the city of Hilo, it is already being serviced. There is a Fire Station, Police Station, Library, Post Office and public school all located within 3 to 5 miles of the subject site. In addition, there are recreation facilities in the general area as well. 18 • • e it shall include lands with satisfactory topography, drainage, and reasonably free from the danger of any flood, tsunami unstable soil condition. and other adverse environmental effects There are no serious topographic, drainage, or soil conditions making the property unsuitable to urban development. • Land contiguous with existing urban areas shall be given more consideration than non-contiguous land, particularly when indicated for future urban use on state or county general plans or county community plans or development plans. The property is adjacent to the Sunrise Estate subdivision which is urban in character. VVithin 500 feet of the site are the Mohouli senior housing complex, the Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Adult day Center and the Sunrise Ridge residential subdivision. Also, the LUPAG Map designation of Medium Density Urban supports the requested State Land Use Designation.. g It shall include lands in appropriate locations for new urban concentrations and shall give consideration to areas of urban growth as shown on the state and county community plans or • development plans. As previously stated the site's LUPAG Map designation of Medium Density Urban supports the requested State Land Use Designation. • It may include lands which do not conform to the standards in paragraphs (1) to (5) when surrounded by or adjacent to existing urban development: and only when those lands represent a minor portion of this district The subject parcel substantially conforms to above criteria and the subject parcel is adjacent to existing urban development. • It shall not include lands, the urbanization of which will contribute toward scattered spot urban development, necessitating unreasonable investment in public infrastructure or support services. The subject parcel is within the City of Hilo and will not contribute to scattered spot urban development. 19 It may include lands with a general slope of twenty percent of more if the commission finds that those lands are desirable and suitable for urban purposes and that the design and construction controls. as adopted by any federal, state. or county agency. are adequate to protect the public health, welfare and safety, and the public's interests in the aesthetic quality of the landscape. This criterion does not apply as the subject property has generally zero to 5% slope. X. CONCLUSION Based on the consistency of the proposed State Land use Boundary Amendment request with the County's land use policies, approval of this request would be logical and reasonable. In addition, the request will help fulfil the need for additional housing options and help generate additional property tax revenue for the County. Finally, the request will allow the development of more affordable housing for the residents of the Big Island. • r 2V ) ) ) ) ) ) ) LAND COURT SYSTEM ) / REGULAR SYSTEM Return .y ai. 'lc up ( ) Total Number of Pages : Tax Map Key No. (3) 2-4-001 : 168 FROM: STATE OF HAWAII BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES TO: COUNTY OF HAWAII 25 Aupuni Street, Suite 2603 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. SETTING ASIDE LAND FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES BY THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER, I, the undersigned, Governor of the State of Hawaii, by virtue of the authority in me vested by Section 171-11, Hawaii Revised Statutes, as amended, and every other authority me hereunto enabling, do hereby order that the public land hereinafter described be, and the same is, hereby set aside for the following public purposes : FOR ELDERLY AND/OR AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING AND RELATED PURPOSES, to be under the control and management of the County of Hawaii, being that parcel of land situate at Waiakea, Hawaii, and identified as "Mohouli South Hilo, Island of Hawaii, a 1 Heights Senior Housing Site, " containing an area of 9 . 091 acres, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and delineated on Exhibit "B, " both of which are attached hereto and made parts 682241 1.DOC Nanning Dept. MUM AF?'D. Department of the Exhibit 2 Attorney Ger;aru! • hereof, said e bits being liespecLiyaly, a survey and survey map prepared by the Survey Division, Deoarrw,nc of • Ao,00unr_ ing and Geheral Servi,:es, itate ci aw .., both ..;eir:g ciei.gna;•led No. 25, 579 :and dated January 24, 2017 . :-F-UPJTCT, HCIWEVER, cc. the corld•ft.ion the: uci:,n cahc;,ilinh of Lhis executive o.rder or in the event of abandonment of fhe oremises Or any portion thereot for a continuous period of one (1 ) year, or for any reason whatsoever, the County of Hawaii shall, within a reasonable time, restore the premises to a condition satisfactory and accebtable to the Department of Land and Natural Resources, State of Hawaii . SUBJECT, FURTHER, to disapproval by the Legislature by two-thirds vote of either the Senate or the House of Representatives or by majority vote of both, in any regular or special session next following the date of this Executive Order . This executive order does not authorize the recipient of the set aside to sell or exchange or otherwise relinquish the State of Hawaii' s title to the subject public land . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State of Hawaii to he affixed. Done at the Capitol at Honolulu this day of 41:A , 2017 . _41 DAVIDit\Q:. IG Governor- of the State of Hawaii APPROVED AS TO FORM: CINDY. Z410 OU Deputy Attorney General Dated: May/..k) , 11 ..% " • 682241_1.DOC 9 "k3111:v • c. r .. - 1..�..� IS .0 Thal: ^C-'_._. •. fthin: is true c:: '✓ - - r xe_u%_"fe O d -. No -.i P 1 .seE_. i_naside landfor public purposes, the or_glfa_L of which is on file in this office . INLieutenant TESTIMONY rJYlY 'V1rI�1.E0. the .Governor of the State of Hawaii, has hereunto subscribed his name and caused the Grjeat Seal of the State to be affixed. SHAN S . TSUTSUI Lieutenant Governor of the State of Hawaii / ;� DONE in Honolulu, this / day of A. D. 2017 62241 L ooc 3 §r qN eta � i I — :(c:(77::17.topaz} anrtn0axg S,3,0111A00 oii sasod_ind put: :{1ap 5 alio,n,4 &role 1aa1 $c'` 9 . Z. ,»'cE • 'cOZi u?c1t?atldcIV l.tno4) pUe"l .To EL de1,'! uo u.,4tiotis sr £L I p013 iiL I `cL1 '9L1 'LL I `8L I s1ol 2u0113130,4 Li7-0 ;,Zc s6c o£cZ coli uolleoiiddV 1_moD p013-1 Jo EL duiAJ uo u.Motis st? 8L1 Pup. 6L1 `O8I sio i E:SuoI looJ Z;1'c££ cc £c 09OZ '1 • -:tpnos on.t_1, utoa; osiA\)iaola patnseotu st u.ulzt? r{q 1ctruuna aauafil `1so/A Pia; 6£'£ZO1 put?tiTno.S 1o2:I 6O.cf7L1•% Juto(-1 <<1\-rIV1- „ uo!P TS uoti1iftl ut,i.t L ananS lttatuu.I AOX) 01 P -'- J -'panoJadzIuluuriN Jo 1tilod ptt3sio salt?utp.t000 alp `1aaa1S potfol, J0 opts tilaou oto uo fio10113p1113 c:07;I uolleolldclV 1ano1 puulio £L dim 00 &mods st? 081 10-1 10 . .tepttnoq lsea ^aril U01:10131 Jo iao.it?d sit11 Jo 300.103 lsamtilnas og1 113 51.11.tzut 7:0, •00, ett?rvy Jo puri (uAo.1D) 1uotuu_i0,O '') oupio riotpocl o Tinton ttt n\t?1-1 `1113A\131-I.Io p11131s1 '0111-1111110S `133T3I13Ak :ITIS `NISd10I-I 'lI-IDI71-I 1-Ii101-i01A! L l O f .c.tt;nu >l 6Lc C 'ON'..1's':} !.)1:1.1:1':'!1- .1•J c1K\ ',201Si.l1C1 1..[V/A\'[I .10 T.L1cJ.5 • x:t , • C.S.F. Ni, 's.',70 .I Lrman. -l. _'I!I 7 4. 11'lctice LLEUnv� thy' north side of ;IUI1UUll Street OLI 2l CUI'V4;; Lu L11L i1l.2111. %Vial a radius of 1950.00 rect. the chord a/Ii11LLLh aid distance heini Cci, 3 1' I" N87.88 feet to the point ofbegi]illim!, and contali1lne an AREA OF 0.091 ACRES. SURVEY DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND GENERAI. SERVICES STATE OF HAWAII By. cd ''Aa...�5 '„y' , (. a Gerald Z. Yonashiro Land Surveyor Ll; Compiled from map and desc, fern. by Island Surveying, Inc. Said map and desc. have been . examined and checked as to form and mathematical correctness but not on the ground by the Survey Division. . • Pi,otair, ,',,r rt, cs `s ( r, .. ,, °'',f .. 'd.;, _7 .1 r. �__ ! % i• Loi 104 Lot 377 • }� r'f .4t ` , n7" 7.AI L Lot 345 • 4\ .--"•-•''..--------------.--......"7" O:fop \\_ 75) I 11 •� Lot 348 Lot 346 VIC .1 Lot 172 Lot 173 Lot 347 // Lot 174 I o; /i Lor 1 7 �„j il1 // ev I I!! I • 1. \ Lot 176 \• � ..s` hp,��t � \ `Cv o'rh �\ • \� \\ �\,'i� ' CP , \......,.. 141 Lot 177 ,ti4�'I { � Lot 178 I w ' cn CP r - 59�5,2" N { 253 off,. Lot ,79 ,4 r ,'4ti PUBLIC SAFETY AND I, RELATED PURPOSES SITE c i. 9e 091 ` I I Governor's Executive w"4 ACRES y Order 4223 -\�'o `0r, Lot 180 i`' 4745.09 S i (C.S.F. 24,596) ,94).-1,p, 't• o 1023.39 Yr Lot 1 A. i`bh HAL4J rn' Lot 2 O a r D `a` \ ' 'V m' ROAD LOT-- c ro 99;31• . Governor's Executive "....•° 4' Feer {iP� Order 4271 Lot J81 ,047,7:..'6,7',,,,/,::;°ifu ; r88Z8a `G (C.S.F. 7.4,785) 09 .. .leee, STREETto Komo,tonn Lot 182 St. Lot 183 '�15i, — G°1°4t fiend "CO. CE,N� T,1 ► t :F Lot 194 UNtVERSTIY OF HAWAII AND AWED PURPOSES SITE .1 Governor's Executive Order 3814 r-- (C.S.F. 22,952) 1 ,XH T �6B.ft • s MOHOULI HEIGHTS ENI R HOUSING SITE Waiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii ,i1 11-010(i 7) 1 C. EX Scale: 1 inch = 200 feet DAY 2-4-011 168 SURVEY DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND GENERAL SERVICES a SF. NO. 25,579 3 STATE OF H A AI I , MAC auurr 24, 2017 PLNN ge o m et r i c i a n <OCT �� z 1f ASSOCIATES , LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com October 5, 2021 Tracie-Lee Camero Planning Commission Division lawai`i County Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3, I-filo, 1-lawai`i 96720 Dear Ms. Camero: Subject: Final Environmental Assessment, Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project, TIVIK (3rd) 2-4-001:168, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii Thank you and your associates for your assistance in reviewing and processing the Final Environmental Assessment(FEA) for the project. Attached is a hardcopy of the FEA for Planning Department files. We have completed the submittal to OEQC, using the FONSI letter, and it is slated to be published on October E. We have also submitted the required librarycopy to the I lawai`i State Documents Center. Upon publication, l will also send via mail or email a "Dear Participant" letter providing notice of Final EA publication to all parties who submitted comments to the Draft EA. Thank you for your assistance in the EA process. If you have any questions, please contact me at 969-7090, or e-mail to rterry(4hawaii.rr.com. Sincerely, 4:)‘191\‘ 11:t Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates Attach: Final EA Cc: Keith Kato, I IICDC: keith.hicdci.,)gmail.com (no attachments) Planning Dept • Exhibit 3 Mitchell D. Roth f��" ' ''! Tendo Kern I r • �l��r r'I t Lee L. Lord t ' 1f Jeffrey W. DaiTo • :rlG:riO�'%71'Oirec lnr \ '••°i a-:�••� !h•our)'Oireocir 11'cs 1 Ea„'ai'i S7like I.;tsL l ln,+ai'i Office '4-51.1-44 Ane I tr l atiUi ilea-Kona. County of Hawaii.' Ildr,.11:n,i Phony tisl32 .47711 Mono_>u.ti)vrrl- s i:astmils',;- .=rr., PLANNING DEPARTMENT E:,,mati>nr;t- September 16, 202 I Environmental Review Program Office of Planning and Sustainable Development 235 S. Beretania Street, Suite 702 Honolulu, HI 96813 • Dear Director, Subject: Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) and Finding of No Significant Impact (TON,SI) for the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Housing Project Location: South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii TIK: (3) 2-4-001:168 With this letter, the Hawaii County Planning Department (Accepting Authority) hereby transmits electronically the Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact (FEA-FONSI) for the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project located on the subject parcel (TMMI.K: (3) 2-4-001:168) in Hilo on the Island of Hawaii, for publication in the next available edition of the Environmental Notice. The Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable HousingProject is being proposed to construct up to 90 units of affordable rental housing for seniors and families by creating a pocket neighborhood concept on 9.091 acres of land. Additional improvements are also planned such as landscaping,-, driveways, utilities and other related improvements. The Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact (DEA- AFONSI) was published in the OEQC's August 8, 2021 issue of the Environmental Notice. The FEA includes copies of comments received and the corresponding responses from the applicant that were received during the 30-day public comment period on the DEA-AFONSI. Based on the findings from Part 5 of the FEA, the Planning Department has determined that this project will not have a "significant effect" or "significant impact" on the quality of the environment and have therefore issued a FONSI. This FONS.I does not constitute approval of the project or any project components or proposed uses. wn•w.piannin9.hatvaiicouutv_2ov Howai i Comm,is cm Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer planninn;uih<waiicount‘.,a., ERPIEN September 16, 202 Pane If you have any question regarding this letter, please contact Tracie-Lee Camera of our Planning Department staff at (808) 961-S166 or via email at Trac e-' TM't_sli )ff_9'ii kw oiic.`}u Ft v.11(A. Sincerely, //o)a^ (7GIG/( o. 71 /- s'Ik iia 7:z1 l5Tr ZENDO KERN Planning Director TC:jaa r'atcohr!1'plam inv'll ihluhwpw'inCit)ch34 2U3lthalk ola o mohouliv,I`ea_onsi_to_oogc.docX cc (via email): Ron Terry•, Geometrician Associates, Environmental Consultant, <rterry a..hawaii.Tr.colim== Keith Kato, Hawaii Island Community Development, <keith.hicdcg.gmaiLcom> From: we,n-Fwster(Oh wr ii.aov To: �G kLv S2 ✓irnrT i�7 _-Le:J Ern. r� Subject: New online submission for The Environmental Notice Date: Monday,September 27,2021 9:23:42 AM Action Name Hale Ola 0 fvlohouli Affordable Housing Project Type of Document/Determination Final environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact(FEA-FONSI) HRS §343-5(a)Trigger(s) • (1)Propose the use of state or county lands or the use of state or county funds Judicial district South IIilci.Flawni'i Tax Map Key(s)(TIvi:K(s)) (3)2-4-001:168 • Action type Applicant Other required permits and approvals • State Land Use District Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban by Windward Planning Commission and Hawaii County Council •201 H Exemption of County Zone (Windward Planning Commission and Hawaii County Council)• National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (State DOH)•Grading,Grubbing and Driveway Permits (County DPW)•Building Permits and Plan Approval(County DPW and Planning) Discretionary consent required State Land Use District Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban Approving agency Hawaii County Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3, Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Agency contact name Trade-Lee Camero Agency contact email(for info about the action) Tracie-Lee,Camero©hawaiicounty.gov Email address or URL for receiving comments Tracie-Lee.Camero a hawaiicountr.gov Agency contact phone (808)961-8166 • Agency address 101 Pauahi Street Suite 3 Hilo.Hawaii 96720 United States Map It Applicant Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Applicant contact name Keith Kato • Applicant contact email • • keith.htcdcaomail.com Applicant contact phone (808)319-2422 Applicant address 100 F auahi Street • Suite 20 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 United States Map It Was this submittal prepared by a consultant? Yes Consultant GEOMETRICIAN ASSOCIATES,LLC Consultant contact name Ron Terry Consultant contact email lterry@hawaii.rr.cont Consultant contact phone (808)987-5239 Consultant address • 10 HINA STREET • Hilo,HI 96720-2005 United States Mao It Action summary 1-IICDC,a non-profit dedicated to developing afthrdable housing,proposes to construct up to 90 units of affordable housing on a 9.091-acre government property in Hilo.Land use designations will he changed to State Land Use Urban and County zoning 01=W-family residential.The site's vegetation is lightly disturbed native'ohi`a forest on the.1881 lava flo v.Surveys have determined that no historic properties,cultural sites or uses,or threatened or endangered plant species are present on the property.Mitigation includes landscaping,construction of a fence adjacent to residential properties,tithing of vegetation clearing to avoid impacts to listed vertebrate species,and NPDES and grading permits with BMPs.Traffic impacts will be minor and within the capacity of the existing irrlerSc'i i un. Reasons supporting determination • Chapter 11-200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules,outlines those factors agencies must consider when determining whether an Action has significant effects: (a) In considering the significance of potential environmental effects. agencies shall consider and evaluate the sum of effects of the Proposed Project on the quality of the environment. (b)In determining whether an action may have a significant effect on the environment.the agency shall consider every phase of a Proposed Project, the expected impacts.and the proposed mitigation measures. In most instances,an action shall be determined to have a significant effect on the • environment if it may: 1. Irrevocably commit a natural,cultural,or historic resource.No valuable natural or cultural resource would be committed or lost.A common native vegetation type and several common native plants are present, but no rare,threatened or endangered species or unique native ecosystems would be adversely affected.An archaeological survey has determined that no historic sites are present on the property or would be affected. No valuable cultural resources and practices such as forest access;fishing,gathering, hunting,or access to ceremonial sites would be affected in any way. 2, Curtail the range of beneficial uses of the environment.No restriction of beneficial uses would occur by construction and occupation of affordable rental housing on the property. • 3.Conflict with the State's environmental policies or long-term environmental goals established by law. The State's long-term environmental policies are set forth in Chapter 344, HRS.The broad goals of this policy are to conserve natural resources and enhance the quality of life.The Proposed Project is environmentally beneficial and all adverse impacts are minor,and it is thus consistent with all elements of the State's long-term environmental policies. 4. Have a substantial adverse effect on the economic welfare,social welfare,or cultural practices of the community and State.The Proposed Project would have highly beneficial and no substantial adverse effects on the economic or social welfare of the Big Island community-or the State of Hawaii. 5. Have a substantial adverse effect on public health.The Proposed Project would not affect public health and safety in any adverse way.Wastewater will be disposed of in conformance with State Department of Health regulations. 6. Involve adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities.The scale and context of the Proposed Project would not produce any major secondary impacts,such as population changes or effects on public facilities_ 7, Involve a substantial degradation of environmental quality. The Proposed Project is minor and environmentally benign,and thus it would not contribute to.environmental degradation. 8. Be individually limited but cumulatively have substantial adverse effect upon the environment or involves a commitment for larger actions.The adverse effects of the Proposed Project involve very limited and temporary disturbance to traffic,air quality,noise, and visual quality during construction. During construction, there is at least a small potential for noise, traffic and dust impacts from the ' affordable rental housing development to acccumulate with those of the proposed adjacent Fire and Police Dispatch Center and the Wailani Mixed Use Project, under the scenario of two or more more being constructed at the same time,These impacts are mitigable and can be handled by construction-phase measures that can easily be implemented by the Hawai`i County Department of Public Works,which is rnonitoring traffic in this area.Although traffic on Mohouli and Komohana Street would clearly rise as a result of all three projects,with the vast majority being attributed to the Wailani project, traffic analysis has demonstrated that with the extension of Ponahawal Street by Wailani, traffic impacts at Mohouli Street would not be severe and level of service would remain acceptable. J. Have a substantial adverse effect on a rare,threatened,or endangered species. or its habitat. Thorough survey has determined that no endangered plant species are present.Other than the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat and the recently delisted Hawaiian hawk. island wide-ranging species that will experience no adverse impacts due to mitigation in the form of timing of vegetation removal and/or survey. no rare.threatened or endangered species of fauna are known to exist on or rear the property,and none would be affected by any project activities_ 10. Have a substantial adverse effect on air or water quality or ambient noise levels. No substantial effects to air, water,or ambient noise would occur.Brief. temporary effects would occur during construction and would be mitigated. Contractors will be required to consult with DOH per Title 11, Chapter 46,HAR (Community Noise Control)prior to construction. DOH would then review the proposed activity,location,equipment,project purpose and timetable in order to decide whether a permit is necessary and what conditions and mitigation measures,such as restriction of equipment type, maintenance requirements,restricted hours,and portable noise barriers,will be necessary_ Dust will be controlled per State regulations through extensive BMPs. Erosion and sedimentation impacts will be avoided by implementation of Best Management Practices during grading. 11. Have a substantial adverse effect on or be likely to suffer damage by being located in an environmentally sensitive area such as a flood plain,tsunami zone,sea level rise exposure area,beach, erosion-prone area,geologically hazardous land, estuary, fresh water, or coastal waters.Although the Proposed Project is located in an area with volcanic and seismic risk, the entire Island of Hawaii shares this risk.The facilities are not imprudent to construct and will employ design and construction standards appropriate to the seismic zone.The property is not located in a flood zone or any other hazardous area, and it would not affect any such area. Due to the elevation of the property at approximately 350 feet above sea level,there is no risk to the Proposed Project from sea level rise.The project has adapted to climate change by accounting for the potential for larger storms,through minimizing hard surfaces that generate runoff in heavy rainfall. 12_Have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas and viewplanes,during day or night,identified in county or state plans or studies.No scenic sites or views are located nearby or would be affected in any way..Ail exterior lighting will be shielded and designed with the proper spectra to protect dark skies and transiting seabirds. 13.Require substantial energy consumption or emit substantial greenhouse gases.Construction would involve unavoidable small but non-negligible carbon emissions. Occupation of the housing would entail greenhouse gas emissions that would be essentially the same regardless of where the residents live, leading to no net increase.Carbon emissions as a result of construction and operation of the Proposed Project would be considered negligible and are not expected to contribute significantly to global climate change. Attached documents(signed agency letter&EA/EIS) • FONSI-QJ6_2021-LTR-TO-ENVIRONMENTAL-REVIEW-PROGRAM-RE,FEA-FONSI-FOR- HALE-OLA-O-MOHOULI-PROJECT pdf • Final-EA-Hale- ta-O-Mohouti-Affordable-Housing-Project.pd( Shapefile • The location map for this Final EA is the same as the location map for the associated Draft EA. Action location map • ,Mohouli-Affordaj~ile-Property.zip Authorized individual • • Ron Terry • Authorization The above named authorized individual hereby certifies that he!she has the authority to make this submission. • • • • Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project • Final Environmental Assessment TM K (3rd) 2-4-0,01 :168 South Hilo District, Hawai`i Island, State of Hawaii October 2021 Prepared for: County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Hale Ola 0 ` Iohouli Affordable Housing Project TMK Ord) 24-001: 168 South Hilo District. I-lawai`i Island. State of Hawaii APPLICANT: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation 100 Pauahi Street, Suite 20 Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 APPROVING AGENCY: County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 IIilo, Hawaii 96720 CONSULTANT: Geometrician'Associates LLC 10 Hina Street Hilo Ilawai`i 96720 CLASS OF ACTION: Use of County Land and County Funds This document is prepared pursuant to: The Hawaii Environmental Protection Act. Chapter 343. Hear*:ai'i.Revised Statutes MRS).and Title 11. Chapter 200.1, Hatirai'i Department of Health Administrative Rules(EAR). (Phis page left } atikj . ' TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ii PART I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION. PURPOSE AND NEED AND E.A. PROCESS 1 1.1 Project Description and Location 1 1.2 Purpose and Need 7 1.3 Environmental Assessment Process 7 1.4 Public Envol‘einem and A.gencv Coordination , 8 I.5 Cost and Schedule , 9 PART 2: ALTERNATIVES 9 2.1 No Action Alternative 9 2.2 Alternative Locations for Affordable Housing Project 9 2.3 Alternative Strateg-ies Involving Existing Facilities 9 PART 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION 10 3.1 Physical Environment 10 3.1.1 Climate, Geology, Soils and Geologic Hazard 10 3.1.2 Drainage, Water Features and Water Quality 13 3.1.3 Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems 14. 3.1.4 Air Quality, Scenic Resources and Noise 20 3.1.5 Hazardous Substances,Toxic Waste and Hazardous Conditions 22 3.2 Socioeconomic and Cultural 23 3.2.1 Socioeconomic Characteristics , 23 \ 3.2.2 Cultural Resources 24 3.2.3 Archaeology and Historic Sites 29 3.3 Infrastructure 30 3.3.1 Utilities and Public Services 30 3.3.2 Roadways and Traffic 3 I 3.4 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts 33 3.5 Required Permits and Approvals 33 3.6 Consistency with Government Plans and Policies 34 3.6.1 Hawai`i State Plan 34 3.6.2 Hawaii State Land Use Law 34 3.6.3 Hawaii County Zoning 37 3.6.4 Hawaii County General Plan 37 PART 4: DETERMINATION . ' 40 PART 5: FINDINGS AND REASONS - 40 REFERENCES 43 LIST OF TABLES TABLE i Plant Species Observed on Project Site 18 TABLE 2 Selected Socioeconomic Characteristics -)., ,_,..1 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE I Location Map ') . FIGURE 2 TM K.1Map 3 FIGURE 3 Project Site Photos 4 FIGURE 4 Concept Site Plan 5 FIGURE 5 Sea Level Rise Map 12 FIGURE 6 Flood Insurance Rate Map and NearbyIntermittent Channels 13 FIGURE 7 Land Use Designations of Property and Vicinity 35 1 Page 1 Hale Qla 0 Alohouli A f/b re/able Housing Environmental Assessment LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX la Comments in Response to Early Consultation APPENDIX lb Comments to Draft EA and Responses APPENDIX 2 Traffic Impact Assessment Report APPENDIX 3 Archaeological Field Inspection Report and SI-IPD Concurrence Letter APPENDIX 4 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment APPENDIX 5 Market Study Preliminary Findings SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) is a non-profit dedicated to developing affordable housing that has assisted in the development of elderly, low-income and transitional housing throughout the Island of Hawai'i. HICDC proposes to construct up to 90 . units of affordable housing, on a 9,091-acre State property in Hilo that Was transferred via Executive Order(E0) to the COLtilty of Hay in for affordable housing purposes. The property is designated in the County General Plan for Medium Density Urban uses but is currently within the State Land Use Agricultural District and County Zoned for agriculture. HICDC has submitted a State Land Use Boundary Amendment Which is currently in prbcess. HICDC intends to utilize the Section 201 H, Hawai`i Revised Statutes (HRS) process obtain the County zoning of RM-4 (multi-family residential, 4,000 square feet minimum per building site), matching uses makai of the project site. The vegetation is lightly disturbed native.'ohi‘aforest on the 1881 lava flow. Primary access to the property will occur from Kupuna Place to Mohouli Street, via an easement on the adjacent parcel, TMK (3) 2-4-001:176, which is currently being developed as a Fire and Police Dispatch Center. Surveys have determined that no historic properties, cultural sites or uses, or threatened or endangered plant species are present on the property. Mitigation includes landscaping, construction of a fence adjacent to residential properties, timing of vegetation clearing and/or surveys to avoid impacts to listed vertebrate species,NPDES and grading permits with Best Management Practices during construction to avoid erosion and sedimentation, and ( precautionary conditions related to inadvertent finds of cultural materials. Traffic impacts will be • minor and within the capacity of the existing intersection. There will be no noticeable change to the traffic level of service on Mohouli Street or other roads. Page- ii Hale 01a,0 Mohouti Afforclable Housing Rovironment.61 I Assessment • PART is PROJECT DESCRIPTION, PURPOSE AND NEED AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS 1.1 Project Description and Location The Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation 0-11CDC) is a non-profit dedicated to developing affordable housing that has assisted in the development of elderly, low-income and transitional housing throughout the Island of Hawaii. HICDC proposes to construct up to 90 units of affordable rental housing in Hilo, Island of 1-lawai'i. The 9.091-acre property on which the facilities would be built, TMK (3) 2-4-00I:168, is a State property that was transferred via Executive Order(EO) 4531 for Affordable Housing Purposes to the County of Hawai`i. The vegetation is lightly disturbed native `ohi`a forest on the 1881 lava flow. Primary access to the property will occur from Kupuna Place to Mohouli Street, via an easement on the adjacent parcel, TiMK (3) 2-4-001: 176, which is currently being developed as a Fire and Police Dispatch Center (Figures 1-4). The development concept for the Proposed Project is to provide affordable rentals for seniors and families. One method of achieving this is to create pocket neighborhoods where clusters of units are arranged around central greens. Under this concept, the units would typically be single-family dwellings; duplexes, and up to four-plea structures not exceeding two stories in height. An illustration of this development type for this site is shown in Figure 4. This concept is dependent on securing the necessary funding and may be altered if appropriate funding is not secured, but in any case, the project will consist of no more than 90 residential units. The Proposed Project would remove existing vegetation, grade using onsite material by balancing cut and fill, install utilities (including connection to the municipal wastewater system), install a border fence on the western side of the property, create residential spaces, construct buildings, and provide accessways, parking and landscaping for each building. The property is designated in the County General Plan for Medium Density Urban uses but is currently • within the State Land Use Agricultural District, with a County Zoning of A-la (agriculture, minimum lot size one acre). After the EA process is complete, HICDC intends to pursue a reclassification of the property to the State Land Use Agricultural District and utilize the Section 201H, Hawai`i Revised Statutes (1-IRS) process in a request filed with the County Office of Housing and Community Development (01-1CD). This law was enacted to provide a process whereby an affordable housing project may be granted exemptions from any statutes, ordinances and rules of any governmental agency relating to planning, zoning and construction standards that do not negatively affect the health and safety of they general public. H1CDC seeks to obtain County zoning of RM-4 (multi-family residential, 4,000 square feet minimum per building site). This 20I1-1 filing also requests the elimination of the loading zone requirement(which 1-IICDC has found is generally not needed at apartments, where loading trucks can utilize the parking lot): a reduction in the minimum separation between main buildings from 15 to 10 feet consistent with the Building Code (to accommodate a mix with more single-family residence, to meet demand); and the elimination of the requirement that neighboring lots adjacent to a County sewer line connect to the sewer line, in order to not unreasonably burden adjacent properties that already have conforming systems. Page 1 Hale 0/a 0 Mohotrli Affordable Horsing Environmental Assessment Figure 1. Location \la ) liply, .� +y - may; ,, Q �4 �£ 4.. ..A e _ ,.it-, .. , Y�. -! te a • aw y ♦ _..^'*x T t.‘.4 „ - ,, - 4 1:1* ' .4 -*4, ,i,,,,4r._54 it s s Id - o�� 4° Property �x geek k� �- ^ i �,5 �. c� m ` - _ _.- Oc X01 �, Base Map ( Googic Earth North t Figure 2. TN1K %lap -- • \:"--(C14 \, 0(/ " sO,$,. k. Sts't 16 6 ' ''''*itcil ( 6 1‘.` /,p� ? so V h / ' ��;; 161� - .) 69 � X31 Z� Qs 5•G' 5 .vt• i� `,/ ! 158 •'++ ?� r� 0t. _ ter, 6.. c , 1. 5£E f �` 13 ti.. „�,^ S 7/..t168 ai «x„ soo3 ft.` \11,9r ci9091 `�a. 176® Source: Hawai`i County Real Property Tax Maps Plat 2-4-I Page 2 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Juatussassy fntuatuuo.I/.tu3 ursnoH digt,ptol/d IInoyoyy 0 n10 aInH f '2nd . i. ' .. '74tn x`s.. soh x , 'r Y {. 1saJoJ paginlsip ssaE ui uo!;uiaiiaA At10UBJ 'q A V rr):Y1J111 itiptool `3aanS rrnoc{oy a i).11 ,\ai.,. _1' 3 w 'k t" .XF +d Aar r" 't. 0 :0. i ..� f r Cr r .. .i. M '' ` ;; it .z Vt i .4,,,,p.,..4.-. ..4!..-* ,.. .,,,.. soaogd al!S a) l'o.id •f a.in��!.111 _� tuauissassw 1aluautunrrnu?3uisrzoN atynnro(fV!Iraoi1oytl 0 'k)arPH f a nd 4J& 3 al5OO9 a,,t -+ a. ,: * rrt a a a 74 4,. ' y ,yam +M ` ...-"*"t"":".....„_---- "�,`^ „".r` :. .SPb ^ v •.v _ , M aA' sIW a , _ ^. a IP 0 i k ,:.,xi (£IQ 1110* nsaln�n !IQ()"P A �'� ats�jacu`e:&en' . Ilgm .rxs`agnln'-u,!4(2. :lic�nr,.,-�'. +� �,�,,,,_�i,�� F,��c a i �' .,c 4 i' ate. "� s � ,. .ref .> a�� r, i �: rd ;4,;:'.41..'�;0'4i4wee. t '-: .'5,4 ,°,',;(:' r i /r4 N f� .?' .. . a ,.. ... ,. .. t- - _- . _. t, f \ -% "; 1 t 4 -L,. ti,r.i #}715 • ''•1 , •` . It .. .."� }��*h. }�{i{. $ ^p fd ¢ 4 � h• ,no T 4 '''"" ' ' SO1O(1(J .)1!S "')!(l.l(1 "� J.Illi>. t u•.Aril 4,.: __ C 1 -- r Z \J t. -3 ,aI Q 11�_ 1 r 4{ ...),/ r f I , [ 1 • "PH\ i r.i {t '�L.'> ma.. Ai . 3 va -- \ , 1r{ . i 3— 1 . _ tri, 1 W fc„ J J I r ' + gin ,' 1 ter_�. .F.. 7 W I N '7'. Site Plan s A ityttaatua.10.ttH 21qPiffiff Piqvp.tojk t/flOL[O)2/0 vi0 Ji&H, 9 agbet • Ii twiti attql sitml 1.2 Purpose and Need f The purpose of the Proposed Project is to meet a portion of the demand for affordable rental housing in East l-lawai`i. Since 1991, HICDC has been providing housing for low and moderate income residents on the Island of l-lawai`i. Until recently, hone construction on the Big Island had outpaced population growth, albeit skewed to upper income levels. Since shortly after the start of the coronavirus pandemic, the demand for housing has skyrocketed — partly fueled by mainland retirees and tech Workers fleeing crowded urban areas — and the affordable housing crisis has worsened,,The Proposed Project would answer the need for additional affordable rental housing in East Hawaii at a centrally located site supplied with existing utility infrastructure, within a mile or two of shopping, schools, and job centers. A Market•Study prepared for this project by Collier's International (Appendix 5 contains preliminary findings) reviewed the need for affordable housing for households with incomes 60% of the median income and below. The area of coverage was Hilo and its secondary market areas from Wainaku to Pepe'ekeo and Kea'au to Kurtistown, as well as specifically for the project site. The analysis concluded that after accounting for available affordable housing units there remains a large demand: • Unmet Housing Demand for All Households 60% AMI and below Hilo Primary Trade Area 5,152 units Secondary Trade Area 1,266 units Total 6,415 units Unmet Housing Demand for Senior Households 60% AM.1 and below Hilo Primary Trade Area 842 units Secondary Trade Area 56 units Total 1,095 units • Demand for Affordable Units at Hale Ola 0 Moliouli • Total 60%AMI and below 373-708 units Senior Units 62-117 units This indicates that there is a substantial need for affordable housing such as that proposed. 1.3 Environmental Assessment Process This Environmental Assessment(EA) discusses possible impacts the Proposed Project may have on the environment and presents mitigative strategies for any potential adverse impacts the Proposed Project • may generate. This Environmental Assessment (EA) is being conducted in accordance with Chapter 343 • of the Hawaii Revised Statutes (1-IRS). This law, along with its implementing regulations, Title 11, Chapter 200.1, of the 1-lawai`i Administrative Rules (HAR), is the basis for the environmental impact process in the State of Hawai`i. According to Chapter 343, an EA is prepared to determine impacts ' associated with an action, to develop mitigation measures for adverse impacts, and to determine whether any of the impacts are significant according to thirteen specific criteria. Part 4 of this document states the anticipated finding that no significant impacts are expected to occur; Part 5 lists each criterion and presents the preliminary findings for each tmade by the applicant in close consultation with the County of .Page 7 Hale Ola 0 illohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment t-lawai'i Planning Department, the approvin4g agency. If, after considering comments to the Draft EA. the approving agency concludes that rid significant impacts would be expected to occur, then the agency will issue aFinding of No Si+ugnificaiit Impact(EONS!), and the action will be permitted to proceed to other appropriate approval and permit processes. If the agency concludes that significant impacts are expected to occur as a result of the Pioposed Project, then an Eng ironmental Impact Statement(EIS) will be prepared. 1.4 Public Involvement and Agency Coordination • The following agencies and organizations were consulted by letter/email on April 20,2021 as part of development of the Environmental Assessment. Federal'. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service State: Department of Health Department of Land and Natural Resources Office of Hawaiian Affairs University of Hawai`i at Hilo County: County Council Department of Environmental Management Department of Public Works • Department of Water Supply Finance Department Fire Department Planning Department Police Department Private: Sierra Club Nearby Property Owners: Ching, Goodwin, Julian,Martins, Okuda, Otis, Park, Sabnani_ Sugai Hawaii Island Chamber of Commerce A sample of the early consultation letter and responses received are contained in Appendix la. Notice of the availability of the Draft EA was ptimblisheci in_tbe August 8, 2Q21f)1>f)('Etivi1_ownetflal Notice, Appendixl b contains writ en c mment, on he Dr,ft EA 'tui the r-s i ns-s t It se comments. \ riots places in the EA have been modified to reflect input received in the comment letters: additional or modified non-procedural text is denoted by double underlines, as:in this paragraph. • P etre 8 Ola t')Mohouli<4ffardahle 10trsirrg.E nvilvnJnental Assessment 1.5 Cost and Schedule Assuminu, the property is granted the requested land use designation changes, H1CDC will finalize design, secure financing and apply for Plan Approval to the Planning Department. and then apply for a grading and grubbing permit and various building permits. The estimated cost for the Proposed Proiect is 547 million. The project is expected to be ready for construction in late 2022 and completed mid-2024. PART 2: ALTERNATIVES No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternati\;e, the County of Hawaii would not construct the affordable rental housing project on this or any other site in the area. The benefits provided by the expansion of housing opportunities would not be realized, but there would be no disturbance of the existing ground surface or vegetation, and no impacts to neighbors or area traffic. The No Action Alternative provides a baseline for comparing the impacts of the Proposed Project. 2.2 Alternative Locations Affordable Housing Project The property was designated by the State Department of Land and Natural Resources as a site for affordable rentals and has been turned over to the County of Hawaii for such development. IHICDC monitors the availability of suitable affordable housing sites throughout the County of Hawai'i that could be similarly conveyed. The only other government-owned and currently available site within central Hilo that has necessary access to the County sewer system is a 0.34-acre site on Puainako Street mokai of Komohana Street (TMK 3-2-4-1:156). That site is smaller than needed and has significant slopes unsuitable for the proposed development concept, and it is not being considered further. No other suitable sites have been identified; therefore, no alternative sites have been advanced in this Environmental Assessment. 2.3 Alternative Strategies Involving Existing Facilities In some cities, existing structures such as commercial and market housing complexes can simply be renovated and converted to affordable rental housing. This can be an economical solution that utilizes existing materials and land in an efficient manner. However, in order to be cost-effectively converted, the complexes need to be in reasonably good condition and have the utility and other infrastructure necessary for housing consistent with modem codes and regulations. To FIICDC's knowledge, no existing sites meet these conditions. HICDC therefore does not consider any such actions as worthy of consideration at this time. and therefore it has not advanced in this Environmental Assessment as an alternative. • Page 9 Hale Ola 0 Rolla Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment PART 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Basic 6..eogretphic Setting The location for the Proposed Project is referred to throughout this EA as the properit. (see Figures 1-4). The term project CirCU is used to describe the general environs of this part of Hilo. The property is a vacant forest of'ohi'a with significant invasion by alien plants and is bordered by Mohouli Street on the south, by the developing Fire and Police Dispatch Center on the east, by residences on agriculturally zoned lots that are part of Sunrise Estates on the north and west. 3.1 Physical Environment 3.1.1 Climate, Geology, Soils and Geologic Hazards Liiviro/iineelia!Setting The climate in the area is warm and moist, with a high average annual rainfall of about 135 inches and a mean annual temperature of approximately 75 degrees Fahrenheit (Giambelluca et al 2013; UH Hilo- Geography 1998). The property is located at about 350 feet in elevation above mean sea level. The underlying geology is a Mauna Loa lava flow dated from 1881 (Wolfe and Morris 1996), On May I, 1880, an eruption began in Moktaiweoweo, the summit crater of Mauna Loa, and lasted a few days. The following November, the eruption resumed, this time from vents along the Northeast Rift Zone. Lava streamed down the mountain toward Hilo Town, the main flow following what was then IKOkOau Gulch. The flow reached the property in late June, 1881, completely covering it, and then continued molcal. The eruption lasted till August 11, stopping just short of a mile from Hilo Bay. Despite the recent age of the lava flow, the area has developed soil due to the rapid vegetation of the lava and buildup of organic material. The soil on the property is Keaukaha highly decomposed plant material, 6 to 20 percent slopes. This soil occurs in undulating to rolling topography of the underlying pahoehoe lava. Rock oiatcrops occupy about 25 percent. of the area. In a representative profile, the surface layer is very dark brown muck about eight inches thick and underlain by pahoehoe lava bedrock. This soil is strongly acidic. The soil above the lava is rapidly permeable. The pahoehoe lava is very slowly permeable, but water moves rapidly through the cracks. Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is slight. In places, roots are matted over the pahoehoe lava or extend a few feet into the cracks. The suitability of the soil as a source of both topsoil and road fill is poor: pahoehoe lava at a depth of less than 10 inches. Permeability is about 3 to 20 inches per hour, reaction is roughly 1 to 5.5 plel, shrink-swell potential is high, and corrosivity for both uncoated steel and concrete is moderate. The agricultural capability subclass rating for this soils is \'lls (limited mainly because it is shallow, droughty or stony), which includes soils that have very severe limitations that make them unsuited to cultivation and that restrict their use largely to pasture or range, woodland or wildlife. Additionally, the property is not prime or unique farmland and is not designated as Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (AL1SH). As such, conversion of the property to urban uses as part of the Proposed Project will not be detrimental to the island's agricultural resource base, nor will it have an adverse impact on the overall agricultural productivity of the region and the island. Page 10 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affirclable Housing Environmental Assessment The entire Big Island is subject to geologic hazards, especially lava flows and earthquakes. Volcanic hazard as assessed by the U.S. Geological Survey in this area of Hilo is 3 on a scale of ascending risk 9 to I iHeliker 1990:23). The hazard risk is based on the fact that Manna Loa is an active volcano. Volcanic hazard zone 3 areas have had I to 5 percent of their land area covered by lava flows or ash since the year 1800, but are at lower risk than zone 2 areas because of their greater distance from recently active vents and/or because the local topography makes it less likely that flows would cover these areas. The Island of Hawaii experiences high seismic activity and is at risk from major earthquake damage (USGS 2000), especially to structures that are poorly designed or built. In October of 2006, two damaging earthquakes.cf magnitude 6.7 and 6.0 struck the west side of'Hawaii island, and a 6.9-magnitude quake shook Kilauea in May'2018. These earthquakes caused no known damage to the property or nearby facilities. The property is undulating, with no surrounding steep slopes, and does not appear to be subject to subsidence, landslides or other:forms of mass wasting. No lava tube caves were observed, but underground voids of various sizes are likely because of the pahoehoe substrate. Impacts cnrca1itigafion Measures Geologic conditions impose no constraints on the Proposed.Project. Most of the surface of Hawaii Island is subject to eventual lava inundation, and any facilities in Hilo face risk. The utilization of the area for affordable rental housing is not imprudent to undertake, and given the need, the State, County and HICDC have determined that it is sensible to construct housing here. Project design will take the seismic setting into account and will,include geotechnical investigations for voids in the lava and mitigate appropriately. No other mitigation measures are expected to be required. There is a scientific consensus that the earth is warming due to manmade increases in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, according to the.United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UH Manoa Sea Grant 2014). Global mean air temperatures are projected to increase by atleast 2.7°F by the. end of the century.This will be-accompanied by the warming of ocean waters, expected to be highest in tropical and subtropical seas of the Northern Hemisphere. For Hawaii, where warming air temperatures are already quite apparent,not only is the equable climate at risk but also agriculture, ecosystems, the visitor industry and public-health. Guidance to federal agencies for addressing climate change issues in environmental reviews was released in August 2096 by the Council on Environmental Quality (US CEQ 2016).The guidance urged that when addressing climate change, agencies should consider: 1)the potential effects of a pr6ject on climate change as indicated by assessing greenhouse gas emissions in a qualitative, or if reasonable, quantitative way; and 2)the effects of climate change on a,project and its environmental impacts. It recommends that agencies consider the short- and long-tents effects and benefits in the alternatives and mitigation analysis in terms of climate change effects and resiliency to the effects ol'a changing climate. The State of Hawaii in Hawaii Revised Statutes §226-109 encourages a similar analysis, and both Act 17 of the 2018 Hawai`i Legislature and Title 1 1, Chapter 200.1 now require analysis of sea-level rise and greenhouse gases in environmental impact statements. In terms of precipitation,wet and dry season contrasts will increase, and wet tropical areas in particular are likely to experience more frequent and extreme precipitation. In general, rainfall in Hawaii has been Variable in the recent past with some years drier and some wetter than avetage. The El Nino Southern Pagel 1 11d e'04i 0 Iviohouli 4 fordable Housing Environmental Assessment Figure56 Sea Level Rise Map • c 0 VULNERABILITY © ! : ej HighNays Sea Level Rise Exposure Area U1}0 OVI HAYS 1 .1 .x„„a • coups.• Cleat • e,de 3.2 A!scenario • Project Site PaclOOS Oscillation (i.e., periodic variation in winds and sea surface temperatures in the Pacific, the warming phase of sea temperature known as El Nino and the cooling phase as La Nina) will likely continue to dominate precipitation patterns from year to year in the tropical Pacific. Climate change-related increases in air temperatures will lead to more evaporation and more moisture in the air. As a result, the variability in El Nino-related precipitation will probably increase, making rainfall predictions difficult. However, it is very likely that warmer temperatures and larger and more frequent tropical storms and hurricanes will affect the Hawaiian Islands in the future. Project design will direct surface runoff into seepage pits of sufficient disposal capacity to accommodate reasonably expected increase in runoff. Due to the elevation of the property at a minimum of 350 feet above sea level, there is no risk to the Proposed Project from sea level rise (Figure 5). Construction of the facilities would involve unavoidable small but non-negligible carbon emissions. Occupation of the housing would entail greenhouse gas emissions that would be essentially the same regardless of where the residents live, leading= to no net increase. The Proposed Project would not be expected to contribute significantly to global climate change. Page 12 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment 3.1.2 Drainage, Water Features and Water Quality Lvistin,t,g 1:tivironiiietti No stream, lakes or other water bodies are present on or near the property. The intermittent Alenaio Stream is approximately 1,500 feet to the north, the main branch of\1'aiakea. Stream is 3.000 feet to the south, and a drainage area associated with the land south of Nlohouli Street is about 500 feet to the south (Figure 7). Alenaio Stream empties into the \Vailoa Riser, an estuary that connects to Hilo Bay. Because of the recent lava, no active drainagewvays are present on the property, and excess rainfall drains directly into the ground. The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) 1551660903E (9/29/2017) shows that the entire project site is in Flood Zone X. outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain (sometimes known as the 500-year floodplain)(Figure 6). Hilo Bay has been struck by several highly destructive tsunami in historic times. Maps printed by the Ha�yai'i County Civil Defense Agency locate the property well ntcntk�t of the area that should be evacuated during a tsunami warning. Figure 6. Flood Insurance Rate \lap anti \.arhv Intermittent ( hanncls a a Subject :. Pro 3erty ' \� , . '74';'74::\:'''''''''fri''..:::::::.i: f':--:-'-"":',:/::,:r.,:,,: ---...--- , , --;-_-..., :::::::4,40:::,: s...r. ' #b ;� r:-vi. r" r; "�. '" . r. ,;::1-fr,:r,I.- :,„ .., 12, / ; Source.adapted from UL\R Flood 131;i laaicc Rat: \laps at htip.:tgis.hawaiinfip.orglfhat. Page 13 Hale Ola 0 Mohouuli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Impacts and A'litigcition Measures Landclearing and construction activities would occur in an area greater than one acre and thus will require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to ensure that erosion and sedimentation impacts to adjacent waters will be minimized. Plans submitted as part of the application for this permit and a County grading permit will specify practices to minimize the potential for sedimentation.. erosion and pollution of coastal waters. HICDC will ensure that its contractor performs all earthwork and gradin, in conformance with: (a) "Storm Drainage Standards," County of Hawai`i, October, 1970, and as revised. (b) Applicable standards and regulations of Chapter 27, "Flood Control," and Chapter 10, "Erosion and Sedimentation Control," of the Hawaii County Code. (c) Conditions of an NPDES permit. Chapter 27 and the County's Storm Drainage Standards require that all increases in runoff due to a project's development must be captured and disposed of. Rainfall runoff for the site after development will be calculated by the project engineers using the Storm Drainage Standards. Drainage structures will be designed and constructed to capture and retain the increase in rainfall runoff generated by the development. Drainage structures may include lava sumps, seepage drains, structures not requiring underground injection control permits, and/or diywells. A typical seepage drain stiucture has a percolation rate of 2 cubic feet per second (cfs), whereas a typical drywell structure has a percolation rate of 6 cfs. The type, number and placement of these structures will be determined during final design. 3.1.3 Flora, Fauna and Ecosystems Exisiing Environment The property was surveyed by Ron Terry, Ph..D_, on portions of three days in December 2020. The objectives of the botanical survey component of the survey were to: I) describe the vegetation; 2) list all species encountered; and 3) identify the locations of any individual plants of rare, threatened or endangered (RTE)species. Plant species were identified in the field and, as necessary, collected and keyed out in the laboratory. Special attention was given to the possible presence of any federally listed (USFWS 2021) threatened or endangered plant species, although the habitat did,not indicate a high potential for their presence. The faunal portion of the survey consisted of visual/auditory faunal surveys both during and apart from the botanical survey, covering birds, mammals, reptiles, and amphibians. Also considered during the sirivey was the general value of the habitat for native birds and the Hawaiian hoary bat. The field survey did not include invertebrates, which require highly specialized techniques by entomologists or other taxa experts, because of the general lack of potential RTE invertebrate species. There are no lakes, ponds or intermittent or permanent streams, and thus aquatic fauna would not be present. The vegetation of the property consists primarily of low to medium-stature forest(20-30 feet) dominated by the natives `5hi`a lehua (ivIeirosicleros polyinorpha var. incarici) and the mat-forming fern, uluhe (Dicranopieris liiiearis). The entire site is also lightly to moderately infested with various invasive trees • and shrubs,notably Asian melastome (?vfelasioina ccinclidiim) and strawberry guava (Psidriim Page 14 Hale Ulp 0 hfohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment ca11/eiarrilrn), with lesser numbers of albizia (1•a/carctria rrrohrccana), octopus tree (Supe/Jlera aciinophi llu), gunpowder tree (Irerna orbic ii ci/i ). wax myrtle (ailr)rella ceri era), ;1/e/nchia iini/ac'17urrr, and other non-natives. The interior of the property appears never to have been mechanically disturbed. The roadside fringes of the property are managed for weeds and experience heavy sunlight. They are thus dominated by invasives such as strawberry guava. ('roialaria spp., and a variety of weedy trees, shrubs, herbs and ferns, as shown in the photos in Figure 3, above. Table 1 is a list of species found on the property. `Ohi'a and uluhe are by far the most abundant native's. Two native epiphytes — the whisk fern moa (Psiloliun imdrwi) and the pakahakaha fern (Lep/soots thaaribergicums)—are scattered but also fairly common. Only a few spindly pukiawe (Leptecophylla tanaeianreicte) are present, remnants of hardy shnibs that probably colonized the 1881 lava flow in abundance in the first few decades but have become shaded out with the growth of`ohi`a trees and especially strawberry guava and Asian melastome. The Hawaiian sumac or neneleau (Rhus sandwic'ensis), which favors disturbed light gaps, is present in a few locations on the edges of the property, as is the -common, almost weedy native herb `uhaloa (tffallheria indica). Of the 51 species detected, six are. indigenous (native to the Hawaiian Islands and elsewhere), while only two—`ohi`a and neneleau-are endemic (found only in the FIawaiian Islands). Each of the indigenous plants is very common throughout the Hawaiian Islands and elsewhere, and no rare or unusual native plant species were present. One common Polynesian introduction was also present: ti (Corelyline fruticosa). During the December 2020 botanical survey and in subsequent dedicated observations, several species of birds, all non-native, were observed: Japanese white-eye (Zosierops japonicus), northern cardinal (Cardura/is can/Ma/is), spotted dove (Slrep'lopelia chinensis),zebra dove (Geopelia striata) and house finch (Ccirpoc/eters nvexicarms). The Japanese white-eye was the most abundantly observed bird. A previous(2009)two-day bird survey by ornithologist Phillip Bruner(Appendix F Hawaii County DPW 2009) of the Fire Administration Complex, directly next door and with the same vegetation, also noted barn owl (Ti+lo alba) and hwamei (Garr/flax canorus). A subsequent survey of that site by Geometrician Associates in 2020 observed various birds, including three species not noted in the 2009 survey: domestic chickens (Gal/ars Obis clonieslieus),common myna (Acridolberes iristis) and saffron finch (Sicalis flaveola). Additional observations would undoubtedly reveal more species of non-native birds. Although the property is covered with native forest that is only moderately degraded, the low elevation — and thus prevalence of mosquitos and avian malaria— reduces the value of habitat for native birds. One fairly common native bird that is increasingly returning to low elevations after having developed some resistance to this disease that plagues the lowlands is the Hawaii `arnakihi (CIrloroc/repanis vireras). This bird was not observed in either 2009 or 2020, but could occasionally be present. The formerly federally-endangered Hawaiian hawk or `io (prier so/ilarias)—which remains listed by the State of Hawai`i--occurs throughout the island of Hawaii from sea level to 8,530-feet in elevation. Although no hawks were observed the surveys for this project, they are frequently observed in a variety of habitats in the South Hilo District and indeed throughout East.Hawai`i. They generally prefer forest habitat but are known from both native and non-native forests and even range into farmland and towns to forage. Hawks nest in tall treeswithin their large territories from early March through the end of September. Most nesting occurs in native `ohi`a trees but hot-native trees, including eucalyptus, Page 15 H rle 0/a 0 Mcihoar/i Affbrclahie Ilousin Environnrenta/'Assessinent • • ironwood, mango, coconut palm and macadamia may also be used. The low to medium-stature forest on and around the property does not offer optimal nest sites for Hawaiian hawks. Given this vegetation, there is a small but not negligible possibility that hawks could nest on or near the property. if nests were present on or very near the property, any grading, tree removal or other construction activities might disturb nesting. although the context adjacent to housing and highways somewhat reduces the likelihood of both nests and disturbance potential. As with all of the island of Hawai �, several RTE seabirds may overfly, roost, nest, or utilize resources in the general project area of urban Hilo, including the endangered Hawaiian petrel (Pieroch•oma saudwichensis), the endangered band-rumped storm petrel (Oceanoc/roma castro), and the threatened Newell's shearwater(Puffnrris auricularis lrewelli). Although they may fly over various locations in South Hilo on their way to and from mountain nesting areas and the open ocean, no suitable nesting.habitat for any of these seabirds is present in lowland I-Iilo. The primary cause of mortality in these species in Hawai`i is thought to be predation by alien mammalian species at the nesting colonies. Collision with man-made structures is another significant cause. Nocturnally flying seabirds, especially fledglings on their way to sea in the summer and fall, can become disoriented by exterior lighting. Disoriented seabirds may collide with manmade structures and, if not killed outright, may become easy targets of predatory mammals. The threatened Hawaiian goose or nene (Branla scnrc/vicensis) has become very common on many Hawaiian islands and can be found at elevations ranging from sea level to sub-alpine areas above 7,000 feet. Historically, flocks moved between high-elevation feeding habitats and lowland nesting areas. Nests consist of'a shallow scrape lined with plant material and down. Breeding pairs usually return to the previous year's nest site,typically in dense vegetation. Nene have an extended breeding season, and nesting may occur in all months except May, June, and July, meaning that even if nene were present then they would not be nesting. The dense forest, lack of water bodies,and absence of grass make the property extremely unsuitable habitat for nene foraging or nesting. It is highly likely that endangered Hawaiian hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereas serno/us), the only native Hawaiian land mammals, at least occasionally utilize the property for feeding and perhaps roosting. They have been found throughout the island of Hawaii. Bats may forage for flying insects on the property on a seasonal basis and may also roost in trees and large shrubs. Bats are often visible while they are feeding on flying insects near dusk and dawn at various locations around the island of Hawaii. Their presence can also be verified by ultrasound detectors or radar. If a bat is detected during a night's study, this merely indicates that they were present in the area. Determination of bat populations or usage patterns requires much more sophisticated, long term studies. Conversely, the absence of bat.detections does not indicate an absence of bats,-which may have been absent for only a night, a week, or a season, or may have been present but undetected. No bats were observed in our surveys, which mostly took place in full daylight and did not use any detection equipment. For the purposes of this assessment, it is assumed that Hawaiian hoary bats are present at least some of the time, as they have been frequently seen and detected by ultrasound and radar in young `ohi`a forests. Hawaiian hoary bats are vulnerable to disturbance during the summer pupping season and require special mitigation measures. Page 16 Bale 0/a 0.tyfQhouli_Affhrdcible Housing Environmental Assess/new Only one non-native mammal was observed on the property — a domestic cat(t'elis caws)—although there were also signs of use by feral pigs (Sus srrofu). It is likely that small Indian mongooses (1-tut7v'.c(c.s a. auro/uu/ctatu.$). mice (Mus spp.l. rats (Rattans spp.). and domestic dogs (Canis' ff.firtniliur s) are also sometimes present. None of these alien mammals have conservation value and all are deleterious to native flora and fauna. There are no native terrestrial reptiles or amphibians in Hawaii. No reptiles were seen but there are probably various species of skink (Family: Scincidae) and gecko (Gekkonidae) present. The highly invasive coqui frogs (EIeuitrerodactylu.> coqui) was heard chirping at several locations. It is possible that bufo toads (Bujb tttarinas) and perhaps other amphibians are also present. No invertebrate survey was undertaken as part of the survey, but in general, RTE native inveitebrates on the Island of I-lawai`i tend to be associated with either high-elevation, older substrate rainforests (e.g.. various Drosophila); coastal dry shrubland (e.g., various Whims); the summit of Mauna Kea (Nt sius wekiuicofa); extremely dry, disturbed 'a'a flows (Marrdaica blackburnii); or aquatic settings (various A'legalagrion). Young, lowland 'ohi`a forests are not a likely setting for any threatened or endangered invertebrates. Nonetheless, some of Hawai'i's unique native invertebrates are associated with lava tube and cave ecosystems (Howarth 2002; Mitchell et al 2005). The roots of`ohi`a trees provide energy and nutrients for a rich ecosystem for various native insects, The island of llawai`i has at least 49 obligate, cave/void-adapted species (Slay et al 2018). New underground species are still being found, but information on their distribution and abundance is sparse and difficult to obtain. Although no true cave openings were observed on the property (some may remain hidden in the uluhe), small lava tubes, collapses, voids and cracks are omnipresent in pahoehoe flows such as those that cover the property. Similar habitat is present over many hundreds of square miles on thewindward side of the island, and the property does not represent essential habitat for this interesting cave fauna. In summary, it is unlikely that any RTE invertebrates would be expected from this property. Impacts'and Mitigation Measures Because of the low elevation as well as the lack of diversity and presence.of invasives in the property's vegetation,the Proposed Project would have no significant adverse impacts to native vegetation, RTE species or animal habitat.The following measures will help avoid impacts to RTE fauna: • To minimize impacts to the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat, trees taller than 15 feet will not be removed or trimmed during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15), unless bat monitoring studies by a qualified biologist using methods acceptable to regulatory agencies determine that no bat roosting is occurring in the affected area. if bat roosts are found in the affected trees, all landclearing activity will cease until the expiration of.the pupping season. Page 17 . tale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Table 1 Plant Species Observed on Project Site Scientific Name Family Common Name Life Form Status''' ;1rundiirigrantirriAria Orchidaceae Baraboo Orchid Herb A Arc/Vittelliptica Nlvrsinaeeae Shoe Button Tree Tree A Ruddick!crsiatica Buddleiaceae Buddleia Shrub A ('/l1uralicr carp trtircr Fabaceae Maunaloa Vine A C'crsrilleja cin'en.cis Scrophulariaceae Indian Paintbrush Herb A ('hamaecrisia nietitans Fabaceac Partridge Pea Herb A ' (.1tharerxt�fun7 spiritism Verbcnaceae Fiddlewood • Tree . A C7usia rosea CIusiaceac Autograph Tree Tree A "nrdyline frtnicose Agavaceae Ti Shrub PI (rolalaria 111 leans Fabaceae' Rattlepod Shrub_ A ('ratcrlarfcr retrrscr Fabaceae Rattlepod Shrub A. Filiciunr clecipiens Sapindaceae Fern Tree Tree A ('t verus pali;stcrchros Cvperaceae Pycreus Herb 1- L)csrnocfiuin cafanifalirnn Fabaceac Desmodium Shrub I A Desnrodiuni irifltream Fabaceae Tick Clover Herb A Dicranopteris'Mewls Gleicheniaceae Ultihe Fern A Erni Iira fbslreruii Asteraceae Pualele Herb A Eragrostis-pectinacean PoaccaeCarolina Love grass Herb A , Hyptis pet-line-11aLamta Laiaccae 1-lyptis Vine A Lepisorus thrnrber;Oanus Polypodiaceae Pakahakaha Fern 1 I eptecophvlla tanreiameiae Ericaecae Pukiawe Shrub 1 L godiurn japonicrni7 Schizaeaceae Japanese Climbing Fern Fern A. Megaiiirrus mcninna Poaceae Guinea Grass Herb ' A Mclastorna candid= Melastorataceae Asian Melastome Shrub A. Meelinis nrfnuli/lora Poaceae Molasses Grass Herb A tMelachia umbellate Sterculiaceae Melochia Tree -A Metrosiderns polrmorpha MyrtaceneOhi`a Tree E Mimosa pudica Fabaceae Sleeping Grass Herb' A . Morella cerifera Myricacene Wax Myrtle Tree A ephrolepis mrrlti/lara Nephrolepidaceae Sword Fern Fern A Parcrserianthes frlcataria, Fabaceac Albizia Tree A Pcrspahrnr conjugatrun Poaceae Hilo Grass Herb A Persea americana Lauiaceae Avocado _Tree A -Polygala pollen/ate Polygalaceac Miikwort Herb A Phan is tankervilleae Orchidaceae Chinese Ground Orchid Herb ' A Phlehodh/n?arrretrnr Polypodiaccae Golden Polypody Fern A Phvllanthrrs clehilis Euphorbiaceae Niruri ' Herb A Phvmatosomus,;*rossus Polypodiaceae Maile Scented Fern Fern A Polvgala panferrlaia Polygalaceae Rooabcer Plant Herb A l'silvbw n nuclnrn Psilotaceae Mon Fern Ally I Psiclizrnr ccrtilelanttrrr Myrtaceae Strawberry Guava Tree A Mrs sandwicensis Anacardiaceae Neneleau Shrub E Sacci alepis indica Poaceae. Glenwood Grass Herb A ;Spc'ithogiottfs plicate? Orchidaceae Malayan Ground Orchid Heib A .Page 18 Hale Dia 1)MOlipnli /firdable Hawing Envir°vnrneratcal Assessment Table I, continued Scientific Name Family Common Name Life Form Status* . j)errr7Ucoce crs:\mger;S _ Rubiaceae Button weed Herb A ,5'chc'filera Lrctinn1 hrlla Araliaceac Octopus Tree Tree A Schi_acin ririm cn,uknwuiruri Poaccac Beardgrass Herb A .S7uch17urp,heicr gip. Verbcnaceac Jamaican Vervain Herb A Ircrrcr oricniaiis Ulmaceae Gunpowder Tree Tree A Trk/ox procianh ns Asteraceae Coat Buttons Herb A Wiritherio indica Malvaceac Herb I A=Alien E—Endemic l lntli mous Pl=Polynesitm Introduced. END=Federal and State Listed Endangered Notes: Also observed unknown non-native species in Iridaceae. e To minimize impacts to Hawaiian hawks, the applicant will avoid earthmoving within 100 meters of tall trees or any tree cutting during the breeding season for Hawaiian hawks (March through the end of September). if this time period cannot be avoided, the applicant will arrange for a hawk nest search to be conducted by a qualified biologist. If hawk nests are present on or near the project site, all landclearing activity will cease until the expiration of the breeding season • Outdoor lighting may attract endangered seabirds,Which may become disoriented by the lighting, resulting in birds being downed. To avoid potential seabird downing through interaction with outdoor lighting, no construction or unshielded equipment lighting will be used after dark between the months of April and October. All permanent lighting will be kept to minimum necessary levels, with shielded lights so as to•lower the ambient glare, in conformance with the Hawai`i County Outdoor Lighting Ordinance (Hawai`i County Code Chapter 9, Article 14). Furthermore, all exterior lighting will consist of blue-deficient lighting such as filtered LED lights or amber LED lights,with a Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) of 2700 Kelvin cif available in the Stag or 3200 Kelvin if not). This will not only reduce the risk that threatened or endangered seabirds may be attracted to and then disoriented by lighting, but will also assist in protecting dark skies. ▪ Although not expected on the site, pre-construction will include another verification that there are no Hawaiian goose or nene(Brcrirrci sandvic•ensis) individuals or nests that could be disturbed by construction activity. If present, standard minimization measures will be instituted, and construction vwill not proceed until they have left the area; if necessary, resource agencies will be contacted. In an email of May 19, 2021 (see Appendix 1a), neighboring property resident Tim Keller stated concern that feral pigs, chickens and rats displaced by the loss of habitat would relocate to his yard_ However, it is more likely:that the conversion from forest to urban uses where feral animals are more easily controlled would reduce the number of feral animals transiting from the property to neighboring residences. An issue for construction in properties with 'ohi'a trees has recently surfaced. Two species of fungus called Ceraiocysiis hrkrtnhict curd C. lrritiuhla produce a disease that is new to science and apparently new to Hawaii—Rapid `Ohi`a Death (ROD) (Hawai`i DOFAW 2017). This disease has killed hundreds of thousands of'ohi`a trees across more than 34,000 acres of the BigIsland. It was first discovered in Lower Puna. The property contains a number of`ohl'a trees. Projects that harm or relocate `ohi`a trees can spread the disease, and certain mitigation measures are recommended, although it is important to Page 19 Wale Ola 0 Mghoz'li Af nrdahle Housing Envirownental Assessment recognize that treatment protocols are evolving. The following mitigation protocol is proposed and has been supplied to DOFA\V for comment as part of the Draft EA review process: • Prior to clearing the edges of the property, any isolated 'ohi'a trees on the boundary will be identified. Any such trees that are not planned for removal on the edges will be protected from disturbance entirely or cut and chipped or buried to ensure that they do not present a ready target for ROD infection that could spread to other trees: • Treat any unavoidable scars on 'ohi'a trees that result from clearing to prevent infestation of the fungus; and • Stack all removed `ohi`a trees and dispose of by burying or chipping; do not remove from project. site. Decontaminate boots and work tools before and after working in an area with `ohi`a trees. Discussions with the U.S., Forest Service during the Draft EA comm, nt period indicated that nhi'aposts or lnut(?er from local trees may Ileutilized_forconstr2>ction wttii_pr_op iirtspec ion/treatment wm_s:eitified si_2ecialists._NICDC may_choose to_I ursue this option, A final biological concern on-tate Big Island is related to clearing and the the movement of products such as scrap wood, rock fill and building materials, which can spread of invasive species, particularly little fire ants and coqui frogs. Both are rampant in the general area, although no fire ants were observed on the property itself during field reconnaissance_ It is unlikely that fill material will be required to brought in; if so,it will be inspected for fire ants. Any material removed from the site to areas without fire ants or coquis will be inspected, and if necessary, treated. 3..1.4 Air Quality, Scenic Resources and Noise Lm'lr'o/lnieJPlaI Selling Airquality in Hilo is generally excellent, although vog from Kilauea volcano is occasionally blown into this part of the island when this volcano is erupting. Even during eruptions., the persistent trade winds keep the project area relatively free of vog for most of the year, Motor vehicles provide another very minor source of air pollution, and combustion-derived air pollution in the entire State of I-iawai`i is minimal. Hawaii Island, like the rest of the state, meets the standards set by the Clean Air Act (CAA) and State of Hawai`i law(FIRS Chapter 342B), and is within an attainment area. Ambient concentrations of air pollution are regulated byboth federal and State of Hawai`"i ambient air quality standards (AAQS). The National AAQS, as well as the State standardsthat are defined in Chapter 11-59 of the Hawaii Administrative Rules, are set at levels that protect public health with a margin of safety, and are subject to periodic review and revision. The property is not an area considered significant for its scenic character in the 1-Iawai`i County General Plan, and no other scenic resources exist, aside from the low to medium-stature `ohi`a forest, which has some scenic and open space value(see photographs in Figure 3). Noise on the property is low to moderate and derived mainly front motor vehicles on Mohouli Street, with very minor noise from adjacent residences. Page 20 Hale Ola 0 Alphouli Affvrciahle Housing Environmental Assessment 11111)CK"!.w ri/k!Mitigation 't'le(l.s',ii'e.' On-site mobile and stationary construction equipment will emit air pollutants from engine exhaust. The largest of this equipment is usually diesel-powered. Nitrogen oxides emissions from. diesel engines can be relatively high compared to gasoline powered equipment, but the standard for nitrogen dioxide is set on an annual basis and is not likely to be violated by,short-term construction equipment emissions. Carbon monoxide emissions from diesel engines. on the other hand, are low and should be relatively insignificant compared to vehicular emisslolls on nearby roadways. Another source of air quality impacts are uncontrolled fugitive dust emissions. State of 1-Iayvai'i Air Pollution Control Regulations at Chapter t I- 60, HAR, prohibit visible emissions of fugitive dust from construction activities at the property boundary, and thus an effective dust control plan for the project construction phase is essential. In addition, a neighbor has expressed concern about potential dust issues (see email from Tim Keller, Appendix la). Dust will be controlled by the following: • The contractor will establish frequent watering program to keep bare-dirt surfaces in construction areas of the property from becoming significant sources of dust. • If there any particularly dust-prone or dust-sensitive areas, wind screens will be installed. Operationally, the Proposed Project would not measurably affect air quality or itself be subject to air quality effects. During construction, there is potential for minor impacts to noise during construction because of excavation, grading, compressors, vehicle and equipment en17ine operation, and construction of new infrastructure, impacting nearby sensitive noise receptors on the margins of the development. Mitigation measures will be ,implemented to avoid or minimze noise impacts including limitation of working hours. Operationally, the housing will produce low to moderate Iroise levels typical of multi-family housing. The increase in vehicular traffic from residents, visitors, and onsite work-related traffic operation of the facility will slightly increase'traffic noise. All increases are expected to be modest and in a context of already moderate 'levels. No exceedances of DOH's "maximum permissible" property-line noise levels would be expected. In terms of noise impacts to future residents from adjacent uses,the Fire and Police Dispatch Center is likely to have completed construction before affordable rental housing residents move in. The operating facility will not generate any substantial noise and will not impact the affordable rental housing units. Aside from this, adjacent property is all zoned for agriculture but currently utilized as large-lot residences and would not constitute a source of nuisance noise. The renrovf'al of the low to medium-stature 'Ohi`a forest and conversion to multi-family housing involves some loss of open space and scenery, The project will, however, match the urbanization of the general area that is occurring up and down the north side of Mohouli Street from Komohana Street to Ktikilau Street, including several senior housing facilities, the Fire and Police Dispatch Center, and the Sunrise Estates subdivision. No impacts to scenic areas identified in the Flawaii County General Plan would occur, Page 21 Hale©/a 0 Worth Affordable 1-lousing Environmental Assessment 3.1.5 Hazardous Substances, Toxic Waste and Hazardous Conditions A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted for the property site by Myounghee Noh and Associates (NINA). The Phase I ESA is attached to this EA as Appendix 4. A Phase I ESA aims to identify rccogni:ed env/row/kw/6i/conditions (R EC) that exist on or near the property and have the potential to impact the project site. The term recognized environmental conditions means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that indicates an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release into structures on the site or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the site. The Phase I ESA included site reconnaissance, interviews with land owners and managers, and research using a variety of State and federal databases. No RECs were identified.No RECs were noted during historic aerial photograph,or topographic map review, and site.reconnaissance in October and November, 2016 found no indication of illegal clumping or other RECs. One.propane aboveground storage tank (AST) was located on a property to the west. The AST was in good condition, and there was no stressed vegetation, and therefore, the AST is not considered a REC. Records indicated two hazardous waste'sites, one current and one former, located 'A mile away from the subject property: 600 Wailoa Street, where the Lanakila Homes Phase 3B-4 site was identified as having heavy metal and lead contaminated soils and is managed with controls. Due to the distance of this site from the property, it is not considered a REC. At a location on Kaumana Drive there had been a HELCO Pole-Mounted Transformer No. 20938 at Pole No. 7. It was identified as having petroleum contamination in the soil. The contaminated soil was removed, and a No Further Action letter was issued on June 5, 2012. Due to the distance of this site from the property, this is not considered an REC. State and federal records were searched, and no records were identified for the property of National Priorities List (NPL) sites, federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) CORRACTS (RCRA Facilities that are'undergoing "corrective action") and Non-CORRACTS Treatment Storage Disposal Facilities, Delisted NPL sites, federal or state Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) sites, federal CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) sites, landfill or solid waste disposal sites, State Leaking Underground Storage Tank (UST) list sites, State Voluntary Cleanup sites, federal RCRA Generator sites, State registered UST sites, Institutional Controls/Engineering Controls registries, federal Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) list sites, or federal or State Brownfields sites. Impacts and iLlidgalion.41eavures No impacts would be expected as the site is properly prepared for the project and the housing'facilities are constructed. Although it is unlikely that any potentially hazardous, toxic or radioactive material would be found on the property, reasonable precautions would be undertaken by the applicant and its contractors in the context of the project construction .Best Management Practices for the appropriate response and remediation should any hazardous, toxic, or radioactive material be encountered during construction. Page 22 Rale Ola(3 Mohouli Alibrdable Housing Environmental Assessment 3.2 Socioeconomic and Cultural • 3.2.1 Socioeconomic Characteristics The Proposed Project would provide much-needed affordable rental housing for the residents of 1-silo and vicinity. Population as measured in the 2010 U.S. Census (the most recent U.S. census) for Hilo, a Census Designated Place (CCD), was 43,263 (U.S. Census Bureau 2010a), Table 2 provides information on the socioeconomic characteristics of the State of 1-lawai'i, the County of Hawaii. and Hilo CDP, from the U.S. Census Bureau. The great majority of the population in Hilo is non-white, and it is one of the most diverse populations in the U.S. Hilo also skews slightly elderly compared to the State as a whole. Other areas of the County are older, but a large portion of this population, particularly in West Hawai`i, is retired Mainland immigrants. Several segments of the population that typically exhibit disadvantaged measures of social welfare are represented in the population of Hilo as compared to the State of Hawaii. Median disproportionately } p i p family income is much les's than the State as a whole. More than 17 percent of individuals have income below the poverty level, almost double the statewide rate. Similar patterns hold for households receiving welfare, food stamps, and disability payments. • Table 2. Selected Socioeconomic Characteristics Description - State of Hawaii County of Hawai'i Hilo CDP Total Population 1,360,301 185,079 43,263 Median age (years) 37.2 40.9 40.5 Total housing units 519,508 82,324 15,483 Older than 65 years 19.0% 21.9% 20.3% Median Household Income' 581,275 S62,409 S63 283 -Individuals below poverty level' 9.3% 13.1% 17.1% Race and Hispanic Origin White alone 24.7% 33.7% 19.7% Black or African .American 1.6% 0.6% 0.8% American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3% 0.5% 0.1% Asian alone 38.6% 222% 32.4% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 5.9% 8.5% 10.3% Two or More Races :23.6% 29.5% 32.0% Hispanic or Latino(of any race) - 8.9% 11.6% 11.8 % Source: U.S.Census Bureau 2010a,20 lob. and 2010c 'Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2019 *Estimates for CCDs have a high margin of error due to small population and sample size. Impacts and Mitigation Measures The Proposed Project is not expected to affect population size or demographics. Having adequate affordable rental housing is critically important for promoting a healthful and socially just environment for the population of Hilo and East Hawaii. The primary impact on socioeconomic conditions would be to provide much-needed affordable rental housing for the residents of Hilo. As discussed in Section 1.1, Page 23 , Hale 010 0 Mohouli Affbrdable Housing Environmental Assessment • HICDC has submitted a State Land Use Boundary Amendment to reclassify the property to the State Land Use Urban District and intends to utilize the Section 201H, HRS process to exempt the current County zoning to obtain a zoning of RM-4 (multi-1'am ilv residential. 4,000 square f'eet in in in-)urn per building site). This extends a cluster of affordable multi-family housing from an area makai and is compatible with nearby uses_ which are primarily single-family residential uses. Maps and a detailed discussion of consistency with land use designations is contained in Section 3.6. Along with those beneficial social effects, motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists on Mohouli Street may experience slightly greater traffic, and residents within the agriculturally zoned residential lots of Kukuau Street may be slightly impacted through having a multi-family housing as neighbors in area that previously was forested and had no active human use. ha response to concerns expressed by adjacent residents during early development phases of the proposal, the applicant will build a fence within the portion of the property that abuts the Kilkilau Street lots in order to reduce access and visual concerns. 3.2.2 Cultural Resources This section utilizes a variety of previous studies concerning Hilo and more specifically WaiTakea Altpua'a (in which the property is located), particularly McEldowney (1979), Kelly (1981) and Maly (1996), as well as the archaeological survey prepared for the site (Appendix 3). :Traditional Cultural.13aelfground The earliest historical knowledge of Hilo comes from legends written by Kamakau(1961) of a 16th century chief climi-a-Liloa (son of Liloa), who at thattime ruled the entire island of Hawai‘i. Descendants of Urni and his sister-wife were referred to as "Kona"chiefs, controlling Ka'0, Kona, and Kohala, while descendants of Uirii and his Maui wife were "Hilo" chiefs, controlling Hanidkua, Hilo, and Puna (Kelly 1981:1). According to Kamakau (1961), both sides fought over control of the island, desiring access to resources such as feathers, indinaki tapa, and canoes on the Hilo side, and wauke tapa, and warm lands and waters on the Kona side(c.f. Kelly t 98 I:3). Kept Maly (1996) conducted 'historical research for the lands ofWainaku, POnahawai,Waidkea, and Pi`ilionna. He evaluated the significance of the use of the Hawaiian word wai in the place names; Ponahawai, Waidkea, Wainaku, and Wailuku (River). According to Maly,'the word wai (water) has strong metaphorical associations with the Hawaiian concept of wealth (waiwai), stressing its cultural importance (Maly I 996:A-2). .In this context, the importance of Hilo can be better understood, with its copious streams that fed taro pondfields and its numerous fishponds. Sometime near the end of the I 6 ' century or early in the I 7th century, the lands of Hilo were divided into ahupna'a, which till today retain their original names (Kelly 1981:3). These include the ohnpua'a of Pu'u'eo, Pi'ihonua, Punahoa, Ponahawai KukCiau and Waidkea (where the property is located). The design of these land divisions was such that residents could have access to all that they needed to live, with ocean resources at the coast, and agricultural and forest resources in the interior. However, only Pi`ihonua and Wai5kea provided access to the full range of resources stretching from the sea up to 6,000 feet:along the slopes of Mauna Kea (Kelly 1981:5). Page 24 Hale 0/a 0 Moho till Affordoble Housing Environmental Assessment Waidkea, which translates as "broad waters" (Pukui et al. 1976:220) is home to the Wailoa River and portions of Hilo. Reed's. Kuhio. and Puhi Bays. Historically, the ocean resources of Hilo Bay were vital to everyday subsistence. Kamakau describes various fishing techniques as follows: -... with basket traps with hook and line... by drugging. A man could also fish with his hands. or with crab or shrimp nets. or with a pole from a ledge or the seashore or catch fish in tide pools with a scoop net, or go along the seashore with a net, or set a fishline; or search for fish with a small basket trap or draw a net over sandy spots in the sea or up onto the shore; or drive fish into nets by splashing; or With a pole. But these were not expert ways of fishing; they were just for the taking of fish to make living more pleasurable..." (Kamakau 1976:59-60 cited in Kelly et al. 1981:16-17), Marine-based subsistence was also strongly linked to social organization. Strict kap/were enforced, which dictated when and where certain varieties of fish such as Opelu and obi could be caught. A dedicated akar fishing ground or ko`a known as Maka-o-Ku was located on the shore of the Waidkea peninsula, near present day Coconut Island (Maly 1996). Theoretically, access rights to fishing areas and ocean resources were defined by ahuinta'a boundaries, with residents of a specific aimpua'cr only taking fish within their own land division. However, in the ease of Waidkea Ahupua`a, the Waidkea fishery extended'straight across Hilo Bay, allowing residents of the adjacent crimpurt a only limited rights in the fishery (Kelly et al. 1981). Extensive 'fishponds were developed in the vicinity of Hilo Bay, including the royal fishponds, five spring-fed inland ponds whose yield was reserved solely for the highest of air The largest of these royal ponds, known as Waidkea, was located a mile southwest of the property in the Wailoa River. Religious ritual accompanied the creation and maintenance of the royal ponds, which according to a historic account from 1823,were surrounded by small huts for their caretakers (Kelly et al. 1981). In addition to marine resources, .farming was essential to the residents of Waiakea. Wet taro was cultivated on mounds built into the existing, marshlands along the Wailoa River behind the sand dunes of Hilo Bay using the kipi/api method, which made a landscape of raised islands and ditches (Maly 1996). According to historical accounts in by Handy and Handy (1972) dry taro was planted wherever there was enough soil on the lava fields of Waifikea and on the slopes between the rivers. • POSI-European Comao Captain George Vancouver, an early European explorer who met with Kamehameha I. at Waidkea in 1794, recorded that Kamehameha was there preparing for his invasion of the neighbor islands, and that. Hilo was an important center because his ['elder'fleet of 800 canoes were being built there(Moniz n.d.; To]leson 2001). The people of Hilo hart long prepared for Kamehameha's arrival and collected a large number of hogs and a variety of plant foods to feed the ruler and his retinue. Kelly et al. (1981) surmised that the people of Hilo had actually prepared for a year prior to Kamehameha's visit and expanded their fields into the open lands behind Hilo to accommodate the increased number of people who would be present. It was during this early'Historic Period that Waidikea Ampua'a became part of.Kameharneha personal land holdings (Moniz Page 25 Hale 010 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment • • In addition to providing valuable subsistence resources, the protected waters and sandy shores of Hilo Bay offered a calm and safe landfall for ships in\olved in ' haling and the sandalwood trade. The sandalwood trade was initiated in the 1790s but did not become successful until 1812; Kamehameha held . the monopoly on the trade and oversaw its management by his chiefs until his death. Thereafter. King Liholiho's favored chiefs mismanaged the trade, which lead to the depletion of the forests and the end of the sandalwood trade by 1830 (Kelly et al 198 I). According to Kelly et al. (1981), historic accounts about whaling suggest that Hilo Bay was not a preferred port for the whaler§ due to the missionary influence and the resultant lack of liquor and women;.sailors preferred Honolulu and Lahaina as ports-of-call. At the end of the 1830s, industrial development was on the rise in Hilo, despite the decline in whaling and the end of the sandalwood trade. In a letter written in 1840, Reverend Titus Coan remarked on the conditions in Hilo: • "Industry is increasing. Our ports and places of trade begin to put on the air of activity and life. Temporal improvements and comforts are fast increasing at Hilo, that is, near the station. Two stores of goods are opened here, and three sugar-mills have recently gone into operation near us. Sugar-cane is being planted to a considerable extent; business assumes more tone and energy, and many of the people are approximating towards industry and competence. Probably the amount of cloth worn by the people has increased ten or twenty fold during four years past. Labor is in better demand and wages are rising continually" (Kelly et. al.1981:49). A period of great socio-political change began with the arrival of the first missionaries to Waiftkea in 1824, culminating in 1848 with the formal land division known as the Great Mcahele. The introduction of new spiritual concepts combined with an increased involvement in international trade and global politics led to a shift in settlement patterns from traditionally dispersed Hawaiian villages to more concentrated urban population centers. A fateful event occurred on the evening of November 7, 1837,when a large tsunami hit Hilo Bay. Reverend Coan described the scene as follows: "... we heard a heavy"sound as of a falling mountain upon the beach. This noise was followed by loud wailing and cries of distress, extending for miles around the shores of the bay... House furniture, calabashes, fuel, timber, canoes, food, clothing, everything floated wild upon the flood. The waters rushed up valleys, carried away fish-ponds, and swept over many plantations of food" (Maly 1996:18). After the tsunami, Hilo underwent a major religious revival that lasted from 1837 until 1840 and included mass conversions and meetings of up to 10,000 worshippers. Other events that had a profound effect on . the demography of Hilo was the measles epidemic of 1848, which claimed one third of the population of the island, followed by an outbreak of smallpox in 1853; later outbreaks of'plague and leprosy caused the population to dwindle further(McEidowney 1979). Pressure from foreign investors, combined with the above-described demographic and socioeconomic changes, resulted in a shift from traditional land tenure to a system of private land ownership that culminated in the formal land division known as the Wide 'A/na or Great ablcahele of 1848.. During the lvlI Bele `A/na all the lands of Hawai`i were classified into one of three categories: Crown Lands (for the Page 26 Hale Diu 0 Alohonli Affordable Housing Environmental4ssessment • occupant of the throne), Konohild Lands (to be divided among 245 chiefs) and Government Lands. Conditions of the;Lluhc'k ',-Jima also afforded native tenants the right to claim, and acquire,title to. parcels that they actively lived on or cultivated for a living (Maly 1996). These kn/tuna claims were essentially transfers of ownership from the ct/i'i nrri (high chief) or konohiki (lesser chieL'overseer), who had been awarded ownership of the crinrptru'a by Kamehameha Ill, to the commoners. The Board of Commissioners oversaw the program and administered the knlc'c.ntcr as Land Commission Awards (LCAw,). • Historically,the entire aiming-1'a of Waiakea was treated as personal land by Kamehameha 1, who then passed it on to his son Liholiho. Waiakea was later inherited by chiefess Kaunuohua, a grand-daughter of Keawemauhili and kahu of Alexander Liholiho (Kame'eleihiwa 1992), who later relinquished the alntpva'ct during the IVIalrele 'Aima. As a result of theivlcthele, Waiakea Ahtlpua`a was set aside as Crown Lands for Kamehameha III. In addition, twenty-six k tteana claims were registered within Waiakea for house lots and cultivation. Most were located along major inland roads or fishponds near Hilo Bay, (Devereux et. al. 1997; Moniz n.d.). No knleana were located on or near the property. Gl%aic kers anti the Heyciciy of Sngcu' Cane Following the ivleihele, the population of Hilo grew and the scattered upland habitations gave way to sugar cultivation (McEldowney 1979:37). iii Waiakea, Kamehameha IV leased large portions of Waiakea to outside interests for pasture and sugar cane cultivation (Moniz 1992). In 1861 S. Kipi leased the Crown. Lands of Waiakea for the rate of$600 dollars per year to be used as pasture for five years (Kelly et al. 1981; Maly 1996). In 1874 the first lease for sugar cane cultivation in Waiakea was granted to Rufus A. Lyman for a term of 25 years. The lease granted him all the privileges of the land including the use of the fishponds and the cutting of firewood (Maly 1996). This lease was eventually transferred to the Waiakea Mill Company,founded by Alexander Young and Theo H. Davis, and the Waiakea Sugar Plantation was established in 1879. The Waiakea Mill Company started with about 350 acres of cultivated lands they bad acquired from Lyman. In 1888 the company acquired a 30-year lease that increased their land holdings in Waiakea.Ahupua`a. When the lease ran out in .1918, the acreage under cultivation had increased to nearly 7,000; but without a lease the crhupna'a fell under the homesteading laws, which required the government to lease the land to individual growers. Waiakea Mill Company was expected to grind the crop for the independent growers under a contract that gave the company 40 percent of the proceeds from the sale of the refined sugar. Contractual and legal problems,combined with a declining sugar market and the devastating Isrincuni of 1946, led the Waiakea Mill Company to cease operation in 1947, and offer its property under General Lease 2741 to private cultivators for the purpose of growing cane (Maly 1996). During its 68 years of operation, the Waiakea Mill Company was a major force in shaping the economic and social growth of Hilo, and certainly left its mark on both the cultural and physical landscapes of the area. A plantation railroad system connected the sugar cane fields with the mill at Wailoa Stream, about a half mile southwest of the property. The railroad in Hilo was in operation from 1899 until 1946. The railroad's primary business centered on the transport of raw sugar froth the mills to the harbor and hauling plantation freight while the transport of passengers was merely a secondary interest. On April 18, 1899 the hepublic of Hawaii and the IIilo Railroad company (HRC) reached an agreement for.the HIPC to Page 27 Hale Ola O MQhouli 4ffordal le Housing Environmental Assessment "build and operate a railroad in; from between and through the districts of 1-filo, Puna, f-ittnakura, Kohttla. Kona, and Kau' (Kelly et al. 1981 :303). This rather liberal agreement ;granted the following to the HRC, subject to the approval of the Minister of the Interior: Government lands for the HRC to build their stations_ depots and other structures, a free right of way across Government Lands and roads: and free use of water for the construction of the railroad (Kelly et al. 1981 ). Six experienced Honolulu businessmen who hoped to recreate their success on O`alu' in the cultivation and transport of sugar cane were behind the I-IR.0 venture Oct the island of Hawaii. In the fall of 1899. the HRC began building its tracks from its terminus in Waia.kea 8.3 miles south to the Olaa Sugar Company Mill near Kea'au, Puna District (Kelly et al. 1981 ). The investors behind the HRC chose this route as their first rail service because they Were also backing the Olaa Sugar enterprise. Interestingly, the first product transported by rail from Olaa Sugar Company was not suggar, but rather timber that had been recently cleared from forests in the area and supplied to the NRC as 35,000 railroad ties (Kelly et al 1981). In 1900, a small wharf was constructed alone the eastern bank of the Wailoa River for the landing of material necessary to build the tracks, buildings and railroad cars. The first locomotive made landfall on May 15, 1900, and rail service from Hilo to Kea`au began on June 18, 1900. The Wailoa River railroad wharf was expanded in 1901 and a large warehouse was built to store up to 15,000 bags of sugar(Kelly et al 198 I). .By the end of 1901, HRC had completed construction of more than 35 miles of railroad line, which included 25.1 miles front Waiak.ea to Kapoho and a 5-mile branch to Pahoa. In 1902, a new sugar warehouse, with a 35,000 bag capacity, was built on the eastern shore of the Wailoa River. In 1903, a new railroad wharf was built north of the mouth of the Wailoa River in I-filo.Bay and the railroad line from Waiakea to Hilo Town was completed, including two bridges over the Wailoa River. The HRC ran mostly deficits during 1901-1905, but the advent of trans-Pacific steamship service in Nilo Bay promised to make the venture profitable. In 1906,the HRC directors paid to put together a proposal to construct a breakwater in order to accommodate the steamships and presented it to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The.HRC was able to secure the appropriation for the b eakwater in 1907 by making assurances to the U.S. government that they would construct a railroad north of Hilo, in addition to wharf facilities (Kelly et al. 1981). Breakwater construction began in 1908 and the HRC hauled most of the rock from Puna to:Hilo for the breakwater project, which compensated for the decline in the sugar industry and resulted in increased revenue for the years 1908-1910. From 1909 to 1913, the HRC laid track from Hilo northward to the district of flinnakua and southward through 'Puna. This expansion was funded by 84.5 million worth of stocks and bonds with annually rising interest rates that the HRC could not afford to pay. The I-IRC's failure to meet their bond interest obligations resulted in foreclosure in 1916. Later that year, the Hilo RailroadCompany was reorganized as the Hawaii Consolidated Railway (HCR) under the leadership of businessmen who represented the companies that ran the sugar plantations along the railroad. Hilo's railroad history helped shape much of the economic activity and land use of East Hawai`i. but did not leave any traces on or near the property. L;visliiig Cultural Resources and Practices The property consists of a low to medium-stature, moderately degraded `crhi`a. forest on a geologically recent (1881) lava flow. It does not contain many natural features that might be important in gathering or ritual, such as caves, springs,pu`aa, etc., although the 'vhi`a trees could provide some gathering resources Page 28 Rale©la 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing.l'nv,ir•onmental Assessment and have symbolic value. In general, with the possible exception of ohi'a, the vegetation does not contain the quality and quantity or resources that \yould be important for natioe gathering. The location about a mile away from the setting for the historical events of Hilo associated with royal residences, battles and visits, fishponds and intensive farming, and sugarcane in and railroads — particularly considering that the entire surface of the area was covered by lava in the 1881 eruption— avoids association with significant cultural sites. The property does not currently support any known traditional resource uses. Archaeological studies (most relevantly. Appendix 2), cultural studies of Waiakea (e.g., Maly 1992), and consultation with 01-IA and neighbors during the EA early consultation process did not indicate any cultural sites or practices. Cultural Resources: impacts and Mitigation Measures The Proposed Project will not have an adverse effect on any cultural resources or practices. The site currently has no uses and few resources. Cultural -use of iehua and liko from the 'ohi'a, which is more or less on hold currently because of concerns about Rapid Death, would not be affected, because there is abundant 'ohi'a in the forests above Hilo that is protected by its status within the Conservation District. There do not appear to be any valued cultural, historical, or natural resources on the property, and no known exercise of traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights. Therefore, no such resources would be affected or impaired by the proposed action, and there is no need for any action for bodies approving land use designation changes or other discretionary approvals to take measures to reasonably protect native Hawaiian rights. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs, State Historic Preservation Division, and other parties were supplied a link to the Draft EA, which has also been made available to agencies and the general public, in order to help finalize this finding. No party reviewing the Draft EA supplied any cultural information. 3.2.3 Archaeology and Historic Properties The entire parcel is completely covered by pahoehoe lava from the 1880 to 1881 flow. Any historic properties that may have been present were covered and destroyed in 1881 due to the complete coverage and thickness of the lava flow. Since 1881, the property has grown shrubs and then trees but has never been used for farming, grazing or other activities. Two prior archaeological studies have been conducted - in the immediate vicinity Of the property, neither of which identified any historic properties. An archaeological field inspection was completed for the property on August 6, 2020 (Appendix 3). The field inspection found no historic properties of any kind. The recommended determination of effect for the proposed project was"no historic properties affected." The field inspection report was submitted in January 2021 to the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) for review as part of the State Land Use Boundary Amendment permit process, pursuant to Chapter 6E, Hawai`i Revised Statutes. By letter of January 15, 2021 (see Appendix 3), SHPD concurred with the findings of the inspection. Page 29 Hale Ola 0 Mohoult.Affbrciable'HousingEnvironmental Assessment • 3.3 Infrastructure 3.3.1 Utilities and Public Services Lvisting facilities and Services Electrical power to the site is supplied by Hawaiian Electric, a privately owned utility company. via its island-wide distribution network, with poles and lines on Mohouli Street. Telephone and cable TV![nternet service are available from Hawaiian Telcom and Spectrum Cable. • There is a 12-inch waterline fronting the property within the Mohouli Street right-of-way and also a 12- inch line within theKupuna Street right-of-way. The project would connect both lines through the property and provide ample fire flow. The Department of Water Supply (DWS) has indicated that water will be available for the project and has provided conditions for granting a water commitment (see letter of June 10, 2021 in Appendix 1 a). In keeping with recommendations provided by the State Commission on Water Resources Management(see letter of May 19, 2021 in Appendix la), information about the project has been supplied to the Planning Department and DWS for incorporation into the County's Water Use and Development Plan; water efficient practices and fixtures are an integral part of project design; stormwater will be handled appropriately onsite.; landscape irrigation will be minimal, because of the climate of the area; and water uses will be calculated by an engineer to ensure adequate evaluation of the project's impact upon water use and resources. No impact to public trust water would be expected. Wastewater will be conveyed to the County wastewater system by installation of a sewer line along the north property lines of parcels -FMK: 2-4-1: 1.76 and 177 that will tie into the sewer manhole on parcel 177. Drainageimprovements will consist of swales and underground connections to drywells that will be spaced within the property to capture project generated run-off. Solid waste will be collected on site and removed periodically by private haulers. Medical,.government, social service, and recreational services and facilities.are located nearby at various locations within central Milo. Impacts and Mitigation Measures All necessary utilities and services are available for the project. No adverse impact upon the ability of the utilities to supply services is expected. No adverse effect to medical, government, social service, and recreational services would occur as a result of the housing, which is expected to be occupied almost entirely with existing East l-lawai`i residents who already utilize such services. in summary, the Proposed.Project would require extension and upgrade of existing facilities but would • not have any substantial impact on existing utilities or public services. Page 30 We'O q 0 Molumli Affordable Hpusing Environmental Assessment • 3.3.2 Roadways and Traffic A Traffic Impact Assessment Report (TZAR) for the Proposed Project Was conducted by AECOM Technical Services, Inc. The report is attached as Appendix 2 and summarized below. Existing l ttciliticx As shown in Figure 4, the proposed facility's access is via an easement over parcel 2-4-001:176 to the intersection of Kupuna Place at Mohouli Street, which currently provides access to the Mohouli Senior Residences and the Adult Day Center. Kupuna Place intersects Mohouli Street at an unsignalized "T"- intersection with STOP-sign control on the Kupuna Place leg of the intersection. Vehicles turning in and out of Kupuna Place are fully accommodated. The Kupuna Place approach is configured with a single lane, although there is sufficient width so that right-turning and left-turning vehicles can move concurrently. There is a refuge in the painted Mohouli Street median for vehicles turning left out of Kupuna Place onto Mohouli Street. The eastbound Mohouli Street approach is a single-lane approach with a median left-turn lane for traffic turning into Kupuna Place. The westbound Mohouli Street approach is configured with a through lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. There are no sidewalks along Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street, but the wide, paved shoulders are used by pedestrians as sidewalks and by bicyclists as bike lanes. There are sidewalks along the internal roadways within.the Mohouli Senior Residences, including on Kupuna Place. There are no crosswalks across the approaches at the Kupuna Place/Mohouli Street intersection. At this time, the property is not served by fixed public transit routes. • Major streets of interest in the area include Mohouli Street, Komohana Street, and.Kukuau Street. These streets all function to transmit traffic from the rnuaakel neighborhoods of Hilo back and forth to the major centers of downtown Hilo and Waiakea. • Impaels and Mitigation Meas ares Hale Ola 0 Mohouli will add up to 90 affordable residential units utilizing Kupuna Place at Mohouli Street as the primary access. This intersection currently provides access to 184 residential units at the Mohouli Senior Residences as well as Adult Day Center. It will also provide access for the Fire and Police Dispatch Center, which will soon be in construction according to the Hawai`i County Department of Public Works (DPW). Traffic from all three facilities must be considered—along with the natural growth in traffic in the general area—in order to evaluate the performance of this intersection in the future. The additional traffic from Hale Ola 0 Mohouli may also have some impact on other intersections in the area, particularly the nearby ones of Mohouli Street at Komohana Street, and Mohouli Street at Kukuau Street. To calculate effects, traffic data was collected and analyzed from each of these intersections. Vehicular turning movement, bicycle, and pedestrian counts were conducted at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection during several AM and PM peak traffic periods in October 2020. Potentially atypical conditions due to COVID-19 related restrictions necessitated use of alternative methods for establishing base condition traffic Volumes. Base traffic turning movement volumes at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Page 31 Hale'Ola(. 111oboirli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment • • Street and the Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersections were obtained from a 2011 TIAR. for the first increnents of senior housing. State Department of Transportation (HDOT) link traffic volumes on Mohouli Street and on Komohana Street for years 2016, 2017. 2018, and 2019 were obtained and used to adjust the traffic turning movement"counts to an estimate of what the base traffic volumes would be without the effects of CON/ID-19. These HDOT counts were also used to help estimate future ambient traffic growth rates. Details of the traffic analysis are found in Appendix 2. In summary, the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli • development is projected to_generate 48 vehicles per hour(vph) durin<_ the AM peak hour with 10 vph inbound and 38 vph outbound. In the PM peak hour, it is expected to generate 68 vph, with 44 vph inbound and 24 vph outbound. The additional generated traffic is forecasted to have minor impacts on intersection operations at the intersections in the vicinity. Assisting in reducing traffic impacts.to minimal levels is a proposed driveway at the mauka end of the property, which will be restricted to right-in/right- our movements. This will help handle many inbound trips and also marrka-bound outbound trips, and will 1 reduce the number of vehicles entering and existing at Kupuna Place (see Figure 3). The existing roadway infrastructure.would be able to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development.. The TIAR recommended the following improvements: • Implement the proposed right-in/right-out driveway on Mohouli Street. As part of the implementation,restripe part of the wide paved shoulder on westbound Mohouli Street as a right- turn only lane into the 1-lale Ola 0 Mohouli development. This recommendation is carried through in the design r f the facility and will be coordinated with the Hawai•i County DPW. • Assure that futuree major developments occurring in the area with traffic impacts to the segment of Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street provide an evaluation of traffic signal warrants for the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection. The Hciwai'1 County DPJ'V has been tasked through Special l'ernril conditions for Fire and Police Dispatch Center to regularly monitor traffic in this area and particularly al the intersection of.rh/ohouli Street and Kupuna Place. With these improvements and monitoring, no significant traffic impacts would,be expected to occur. The Hawai`i County Police Department provided an initial review of the project during early consultation and wrote a letter of April 28, 2021 (see Appendix la) indicating no comments at this time. They have been provided a link to the Draft EA. In an email of May 19, 2021 (see Appendix la), neighboring property resident Tim Keller stated concern that having a right-in/right out tnaarka driveway to the housing complex would funnel traffic west onto Mohouli and then north onto-Kukuau Street, increasing the traffic in his nei<ghborhood because of motorists bound to mctkai destinations in 'l-filo. While it is likely that some mcntka-bound traffic will exit the mania driveway, effects to KOlkuau Street are unlikely. The absence of a signal on Kukuau Street at Komohana Street, and the presence of a signal at Mohouli Street, makes it counterintuitive to utilize a roundabout route through Kukuau Street to access makai destinations in Hilo. Therefore, no significant increase in traffic to Kukuau Street between Mohouli Street and Konohana Street is thus expected. .Page 32 .Hale Ola 0 illvhouli Affordable Hou sing•Environmental Assessment 3.4 Secondary anti Cumulative Impacts The Proposed Project will not involve any substantial secondary or cumulative impacts, such as population changes or effects on other public facilities. HICDC expects that the great majority of residents of I-tale Ola 0 Mohouli will be existing residents on the island of' Hawai`iand likely East Hawaii. based on the substantial local need and previous affordable housing projects. The jobs Ygenerated by construction and maintenance of the facility are very likely to be filled by local labor. Thus, no significant net influx of population to East I-lawai`i would be expected. Traffic can be considered a secondary impact of facility development, and it has been fully evaluated through a Traffic impact Assessment Report(TIAR), as discussed above in Section 3.3.2. Cumulative impacts result when implementation of several projects that individually have limited impacts combine to produce more severe impacts or conflicts in mitigation measures. The Proposed Project will have very limited and temporary construction period impacts, such as noise, traffic, dust and sedimentation. Three other projects are known to be in planning in the vicinity. Directly adjacent is the Fire and Police Dispatch Center, which, as previously discussed, the Hawaii County DPW expects will soon be in construction. About 1,000 feet away on the land extending from the current terminus of Ponahawai Street between Komohana and the Mohouli Streets is the proposed Wailani mixed-use project. Ln planning since 2009, and scheduled to begin construction soon, the residential commercial project is situated on a 171-acre parcel of land between Komohana Street and Mohouli Street. The design, which has varied widely over the decade of planning, currently calls for up to 700 residential units and a maximum commercial floor space of 420,000 square feet. Ponahawai Street would be extended to Mohouli Street to deal with traffic, and streets would have curbs, gutters and sidewalks to provide an urban and walkable feel. Finally, a Portuguese Cultural Center is planned for the corner of Komohana and Ponahawai Streets. The roughly 6,000 square foot facility would serve as a museum, performance space and dining hall and would also include a garden and stone oven. Fundraising is underway, but the timing of construction is currently not set. The scale of the project has recently been downsized. During construction, there is at least a small potential for noise, traffic and dust impacts from the four projects to acccumulate, under the scenario of two or more more being constructed at the same time. These impacts are mitigable and can be handled by construction-phase measures that can easily be implemented by the Hawai`i County DPW in coordination with the HICDC and other parties involved in construction. As discussed above, permanent traffic levels on Mohouli and Komohana Street would clearly rise as a result of all four projects —with most attributable to the Wailani project—but would be largely mitigated by the built-in mitigation of the extension of Ponahawai Street to Mohouli Street. Traffic impacts would not be severe and level of service would remain acceptable. 3.5 Required Permits and Approvals The following permits and approvals would be required: State Land Use District Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban by Windward Planning Commission and Hawai`i County Council e 2011-1 Exemption of County Zone (Windward Planning'Commission and Hawai`i County Council) 0 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit(State DOH) Page 33 Hale 01cr D Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment • Grading. Grubbing and Driveway Permits (County DPW) • Building Permits and Plan Approval (County DPW and Planning) 3.6 Consistency with Government Plans and Policies -- • 3.6.1 1-las ai`i State Plan Adopted in 1978 and last revised in 1991 (Hawai`i Revised Statutes, Chapter 226, as amended). the Plan establishes a set of themes, goals, objectives and policies that are meant to guide the State's long-run growth and development activities. The three themes that express the basic purpose of the Hawcti'i Slate Plan are individual and family self-sufficiency, social and economic mobility and community or social well-being. The Proposed Project would promote these goals by providing affordable rental housing, thereby enhancing quality-of-life, self-sufficiency, and community, economic and social well-being. 3.6.2 Hawaii State Land Use Law Chapter 205 HRS classifies all land in the State of Hawaii into one of four land use categories—Urban, Rural, Agricultural;or Conservation. The property is currently in the State Land Use Agricultural District (Figure 7a). HICDC has filed a petition with the County ofHawai`i to reclassify the property to the Urban District. The process will involve a public hearing before the Windward Planning Commission,which will provide a recommendation to the Hawaii County Council, which must pass an Ordinance to amend the District Boundary. The State Land Use Boundary Amendment request is in conformance with the appropriate standards. A brief summary of conformance to standards related to effects on the health and safety of the general public, as expressed in Chapter .15-15,FIRS, Section 18, follows: It shall include lands characterized by "city-like" concentrations of people, structures, streets, urban level of services and other related land uses; it shall take into consideration the following specific factors: • Proximity to centers of trading and employment except where the development would generate new centers of trading card employment. Discussion: The properly is within the developed area of Hilo. In the vicinity there are Iniunlreds of residlerrtlal units to the north. court east, including the Sunrise Estates/Ridge residential subdivisions. Fruriherinore, the LlIPAG Map designation of&tedium Density Urban supports the requested State Laird Use Designation. • Availability of basic services such as schools, parks, wastewater systems, solid waste disposal, drainage, water transportation systems, public utilities, and police and fire protection; and sufficient reserve areas for foreseeable urban growth. Page 34 .Hale 0la 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Figure 7. Land Use Designations of Property and Vicinity e' 7a. State Land Use District --1 . , Hilo URBAN .-, Property AGRICULTURAL Source: Land Use Commission. Imps: Itic.havk.,ii1.$2,01 maps land-use-district-boundarv-maps state-of:hav,,iiii-land-use-district- boundaries-map Acc. 7 21. Note: not all recently approved amendments are depicted in thc. utap. 7b. County Zonin i „,,,,---t ” .9.- . -s,;..,.,. -\\.y.,,,..,,s4,... ........_ „op/ I 4 A(Iii,..tilt we joy RM Multi-famity RS Single ,,„. •,. - ,...„4„,, . PD Ct“liF,t D',t'i't ' ,?,,,, ‘, 41: \''ff, .:‘`.: ,,,,,',..,,,, •,''''‘i\s‘ ti Uriversity ,--c-- --^. % ',,,'„‘,1.•:'-‘,0...:7N`''''''',, '' ',.t'l,... ,+,4?"4„t,„ .. „ • , • • • •• •,, ,• --7.41.. ,,,,,., - ,„,, '''•.-'',,',',"s‘,t°,,•••,4,A'', '''‘'''„,..s,'s ,!-,',.;',,'' N.' • ",.`"4,,s,'s‘t:.,'s'. s sjr,,, ,,,,',. ,,,,>,,,,‘ - . . \, ,1,4„;0,„0/„-- 4 4,4,„4Y ,•'>',.A Iii"i''4" '140 --r" ,'''st;''.'s, 4 ',,., i' j _ tt,,,':4' __. j ,, % ,,„, .0 - PD „ , .40 Ifillml •i ---7",,, , . „ . .A. -•'.\\47.'" „\.,, Source:County of Hawaii.htips:/iwww.arcgis.corniliomefitem.littul?id=e8lbcaf8da9a4140a09aa922ef918ea4 Ace. 7/21 Page 35 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Figure 7. Land Use Designations of Property and Vicinit 7c. County General Plan (Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide Map) Hoo LaAY3ai'StX �JaBT?'` High Density Urban Medi.rr, r'vr n it Urban Low Density Urban 44,00„,,o, Rural Property University Use Source:County of Hawaii. Imps: 'www.arcgis.com:home itcru.htm1?id=073ebc14_eti:4;eche9c-r, cr,>ft391 Acc. 7i2 I>iscuwsion: As the property is part ofihe urban area of.Hilo, it is already beingservicecl. A I:ire Station, Police ,Station, l,ihra,:r. Post Office and public school are all located within two miles of the site. Jnr culdilion, there arc'many recreational fiacilities ill the general area. • It shall include lands with satisfactory topography, drainage, and reasonably free from the danger of any flood, tsunami unstable soil condition, and other adverse environmental effects I)iscrrssiorr: There are no serious topographic, drainage, or soil conditions making the property unsuitable io urban development • Land contiguous with existing urban areas shall be given more consideration than non-contiguous land, particularly when indicated for future urban use on state or county general plans or county community plans or development plans. Page 36 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affhrdable Housing Environmental Assessment l)i.1'C'iL'sinhl: /lie'imperil) is adjacent to the.5nitlrise Estates subdivisioil which is urban in character. 167thiit 500 fi'c't of/hc.ritc are the a-Iuhon/i senior hou.sin,t,complex and the Harty and leaneic II•cinheig Adult Dar Center. • • It shall include lands in appropriate locations for new urban concentrations and shall give consideration to areas of urban growth as shown on the state and county community plans or development plans. Discussion: The pi opertv's 1.(IPAG 11/10p designation of Mediimi Density Urban supports the requested .S7ate Gane! Use Desi,,naiion. • • it may include lands which do not conform to the standards in paragraphs (I) to (5)when surrounded by or adjacent to existing urban development; and only when those lands represent a minor portion of this district. Discussion: The subject parcel substantially col formas to above criteria and in addition is adjacent to existing urban dei'elopment. • It shall not include lands, the urbanization of Which will contribute toward scattered spot urban development, necessitating unreasonable investment in public infrastructure or support services. Discussion: Placing the subject parcel in the Urban district does not represent spot development, as it is adjacent to urban development, supplied with all necessary utilities cmd services for urban use, and is designated,for urban uses in the General Plan. 3.6.3 Hawai'i County Zoning The property is currently zoned Agriculture A-1 a (minimum lot size one acre) (see Figure 7b). As discussed in Sections 1.1 and 3.6.2, HICDC intends to utilize the Section 201 H,FIRS process in a request filed with the County OHCD. HICDC seeks, among other exemptions, to exempt the current County zoning to obtain a zoning of RM-4 (multi-family residential, 4,000 square feet minimum per building site). The process will involve a public hearing before the Windward Planning Commission, which will provide a recommendation to the Hawaii County Council, which must pass a resolution to permit the 20111 exemptions. In that all necessary services and facilities are available, and the General Plan designates the area.for Medium Density urban uses, and the property is adjacent to existing urban zoning, the property is suitable for residential zoning and there will be no effects on the health and safety of the general public. 3.6.4 Hawai`i County General Plan The General Pian for the County of FIawai'i is a policy document expressing the broad goals and policies for the long-range development of the Island of Hawai`i. The plan was adopted by ordinance in 1989 and revised in 2005 (Hawai`i County Planning Department). The General Plan itself is organized into thirteen elements, with policies, objectives, standards, and principles for each. There are also discussions of the specific applicability of each element to the nine judicial districts comprising the County of Hawaii. ,Page 37 Hale Uln Q Mohouli Affordable /lousing Environmental Assessment • Most relevant to the proposed project are the following Go'al and Policies, and Courses of Action of particular chapters of the General Plan: LAND USE 14.1.2 GOALS (a) Designate and allocate land uses iii appropriate proportions and mix and in keeping with the social, cultural, and physical environments of the County. (b) Protect and encourage the intensive and extensive utilization of the County's important agricultural lands. (c) Protect and preserve forest, water;natural and scientific reserves and open areas. • 14.1.3 POLICIES (a)Zone urban types of uses in areas with ease of access to community services and employment centers and with adequate public utilities and facilities. (b)Promote and encourage the rehabilitation and use of urban areas that are serviced by basic community facilities and utilities. (c) Allocate appropriate requested zoning in accordance with the existing or projected needs of neighborhood, community, region and County. (j) Encourage urban development within existing zoned areas already served by basic infrastructure, or close to such areas, instead of scattered development. The Hawai'i County General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide(LUPAG) component of the General Plan is a graphic representation of the Plan's goals, policies, and standards as well as of the physical relationship between land uses. It also establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the planned public and cultural facilities, public utilities and safety features, and transportation corridors. The property is within an area classified as Medium Density Urban (Figure 7c). Discussion: The need for affordable rental housing is critical and the Proposed Project is in keeping with the'social, cultural, and physical environinent. The area is not identified as important agricultural lands or lands valuable fir conservation. The area has ease of access to community services and employment centers along with adequate public utilities coldfcicilities. The property has adequate illfu.strniclure in terms of water, proximity to wastewater lines, electric utilities and transportation_f<icilities, and does nor represent scattered development. The proposed use for mulii,fcnnhir housing is consistent witli the property's mechiui'n density designation in the I UPAG. HOUSING 9.2 GOALS (a) Attain safe, sanitary, and livable housing for the residents of the County of Hawaii. • (b) Attain a diversity of socio-economic housing mix throughout the different parts of the County. (ci) Create viable communities with affordable housing and suitable living environments. (f) Seek sufficient production of new affordable rental and fee-simple housing in the County in a variety of sizes to satisfactorily accommodate the needs and desires of families and individuals. (h) Make affordable housing available in reasonable proximity to employment centers. Page 38 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment • 9.3 POLICIES (a),Encoura4ce a volume of construction and rehabilitation.of housing sufficient to-meet growth needs and correct existing deficiencies. ` (c) Encourage corporations and nonprofit organizations to participate in Federal. State and private programs to provide new and rehabilitated housing for low and moderate income Liniilies, (j) Initiate and participate in activities with the private sector including the provision of leadership and expertise to neighborhoods and nonprofit organizations in the development of housing and community development projects. Discussion: The Proposed Project would provide additional ci/Thrdable rental housing in an area with high demand iwcir sources of employment and services. HISTORIC SITES 6.2 GOALS (a) Protect; restore, and enhance the sites, buildings, and objects of significant historical and cultural importance to Hawaii. (b)Appropriate access to significant historic sites, buildings, and objects of public interest should be made available. Discussion: The Proposed Project has involved appropriate archaeological survey to determine the presence and significance of historic sites, of which there are none. Therefore the action satisfies relevant goals,,policies, and coiir'ses of action for historic sites in Hawai`i County. • NATURAL BEAUTY 7.2 GOALS (a) Protect, preserve and enhance the quality of areas endowed with natural beauty, including the quality of coastal scenic resources. (b)Protect scenic vistas and view planes from becoming obstructed. (c)Maximize opportunities for present and future generations to appreciate and enjoy natural and scenic beauty. • 7.3 POLICIES (a) Increase public pedestrian access opportunities to scenic places and vistas. (d)Access easement to public or private lands that have natural or scenic value shall be provided or acquired for the public. (1) Do not allow incompatible construction in areas of natural beauty. Discussion: The Proposed Project does not involve scenic areas or vantages and would not be inconsistent 'with the natural beauty oldie Hilo circa. Therefore the action is consistent with relevant goals, policies, incl courses of action of the Natural Beauty section °flue Han ai'i Country General Plan. NATURAL RESOURCES • 8.2 GOALS (a) Protect and conserve the natural resources from undue exploitation, encroachment and damage, (b)Provide opportunities for recreational, economic, and educational needs without despoiling or endangering natural resources. Page 39 Haile Ola 0lvfohorrli A fordable Housing Environmental Assessment • (c) Protect and promote the prudent use of Hawaii's unique, fragile, and significant environmental and natural resources. . (e) Protect and effectively manage Hawaii's open space, watersheds, shoreline, and natural areas. 8.3 POLICIES (b) Encourage a program of collection and dissemination of basic data concerning natural resources. (h) Encourage public and private agencies to manage the natural resources in a manlier-that avoids or nimimizes adverse effects on the environment and depletion of energy and natural resources to the fullest extent. (i) Encourage an overall conservation ethic in the use of Hawaii's resources by protecting, preserving, and conserving the critical and significant natural resources of the County of Hawaii. ('u) Ensure that activities authorized or funded by the County do not damage important natural resources. • Discussion: Although the Propased Project won/cl involve lightly invaded))alive `ohi'a Ibrest, the loss of roughly)line acres is miniscule Il) Comparison to the thousands of acres of-nearly identical olu'a prest mcrtlltia of Hilo on the 1881 lava fiow, mast 0/which has near-certain[uc(rclntees ofprotection because of its classification in the Conservation District. The Proposed Project is thus not inconsistent with the goals, standards and policies of the Natural Resources chapter of the Hmrai'i County General Plan. 11 should he noted that the property i5' not within the Special Management Area(Bile). PART 4: DETERMINATION Based on the findings below,and upon consideration of comments to the Draft EA, the FIawai`i County Planning Department has determined that the proposed action will not significantly alter the environment, as impacts will be minimal and has accordingly issued a Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI). PART 5: FINDINGS AND REASONS Chapter 11-200.1-13, I.Iawai'i Administrative Rules, outlines those factors agencies must consider when deterinwing whether an Action' has significant effects: (a) In considering the significance of potential environmental effects, agencies shall consider and evaluate the sum of effects of the Proposed Project on the quality of the environment. (b) In deten»ining whether an action may have a significant effect on the environment, the agency shall consider every phase of a Proposed Project, the expected impacts, and the proposed mitigation measures. In most instances, an action shall be determined to have a significant effect on the environment if it may: Irrevocably commit a natural, cultural,.or historic resource.'No valuable natural or cultural resource would be committed or lost. A common native vegetation type and several common native plants are present,but no rare, threatened or endangered species or unique native ecosystems would be adversely affected. An archaeological survey has determined that no historic sites are present on the property or would be affected. No valuable cultural.resources and practices such as forest access,fishing, gathering, hunting, or access to ceremonial sites would be affected in any way. Page 40 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli 4ffhrdable Housing-Environmental Assessment • �. ('rn tail the range e of beneficial ti.ves girdle environment. No restriction of beneficial uses would occur by construction and occupation of affordable rental housing on the property. 3. Conflict with the S'tcite's environmental policies or long-term enrironmetual goals c stablichea hl las: . The State's long-term environmental policies are set forth in Chapter 344. HRS. The broad goals of this policy are to conserve natural resources and enhance the quality of life. The Proposed Project is environmentally beneficial and all adverse impacts are minor, and it is thus consistent with all elements of the State's long-term environmental policies. 4. I-lave cr substcarticil adverse effect on the economic welfare, social 11 elfare, or cultural practices of the community and Stole. The Proposed Project would have highly beneficial and no substantial adverse effects on the economic or social welfare of the Big Island community or the State of Hawaii. 5. Have a substantial ac/verse effect on prublic health. The Proposed Project would not affect public health and safety in any adverse way. Wastewater will be disposed of in conformance with State Department of Health regulations. 6. Involve adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public.facilities. The scale and context of the Proposed Project would not produce any major secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. 7. Involve cisubstantial cleradcition of environmental quality. The Proposed Project is minor and environmentally benign and would not contribute to environmental degradation. S. Be individually limited but cumulatively have substantiail adverse effect upon the environment or involves a commitment for larger actions. The adverse effects of the Proposed Project involve.vety limited and temporary disturbance to traffic, air quality, noise, and visual quality during construction. During construction,there is at least a small potential for noise, traffic and dust impacts from the affordable rental housing development to acccumulate with those of the proposed adjacent Fire and Police Dispatch Center, Portuguese Cultural Center and the Wailani Mixed Use Project,under the scenario of two or more more being constructed at the same time. These impacts are mitigable and can be handled by construction-phase measures that can easily be implemented by the I-awai`i County Department of Public Works, which is monitoring traffic in this area. Although traffic on Mohouli and Komohana Street would clearly rise as a result of all three projects,with the vast majority being attributed to the Wailani project, • traffic analysis has demonstrated that with the extension of Ponahawai Street by Wailani, traffic impacts at Mohouli Street would not be severe and level of service would remain acceptable. 9. Hove cr substantial adverse effect oil ci rare, threatened, or endangered species. or its habitat. Thorough survey has determined that tato endangered plant species are present. Other than the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat and the recently federally delisted Hawaiian hawk, island wide-ranging species that will experience no adverse impacts due to mitigation in the form of timing of vegetation removal and/or Page 41 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment • survey, no rare, threatened or endangered species of fauna are known to exist on or near the property, and none would be affected by any project activities. r 10. l-/circa srlhstatnial adverse 11,feel on air or water quality Or anlhic/// rioi.,c /ci'ct . No substantial effects to air, water, or ambient noise /would occur. Brief, temporary effects would occur during construction and would be mitigated. Contractors will be required to consult with DOH per Title 1 I. Chapter 46. HAR (Community Noise Control) prior to construction. DOH would then reviews the proposed activity, location, equipment, project purpose and timetable in order to decide whether a permit is necessary and what conditions and mitigation measures, such as restriction of equipment type, maintenance requirements, restricted hours, and portable noise barriers, will be necessary. Dust \vill be controlled per State regulations through extensive BMPs. Erosion and sedimentation impacts will be avoided by implementation of Best Management Practices during grading. 11. Have a subsiariiial adverse e%fecl on Or be likely 10 stiffer dunnage by being located in an environmentally sensitive area such as a,flood plain, tsunami:one, sea level rise e.\1)Osaire area, beach, erosion-prone area, geologically ha=ciaous land, estuary,fresh water, or coastal waters. Although the Proposed Project is located in an area with volcanic and seismic risk, the entire island of Hawaii shares this risk. The facilities are not imprudent to construct and will employ design and construction standards appropriate to the seismic zone. The property is not located in a floodplain or any other hazardous area, and it would not affect any such area. Due to the elevation of the property at approximately 350 feet above sea level, there is no risk to the Proposed Project from sea level rise. The project has adapted to climate change by accounting for the potential for larggei'storms, through minimizing hard surfaces that generate runoff in heavy rainfall. 12. Have ci substantial cidverse effi:c/on scenic vistas and viewplanes, during Clay or night, iden/fed in county or slate plcins or studies. No scenic sites or views are located nearby and none would be affected in any way. All exterior lighting will be shielded and designed with the proper spectra to protect dark skies and transiting seabirds. 13. Require substantival energy consumption Or emit substantial greenhouse gases. Construction would involve unavoidable small but non-ne<gligible carbon emissions. Occupation of the housing would entail greenhouse gas emissions that would be essentially the same regardless of where the residents live, leading to no net increase. Carbon emissions as a result of construction and operation of the Proposed Project would be considered negligible and are not expected to contribute significantly to global climate change. • • Page 42 Hale Ola n Mnhozili Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment RE FERENCES Devereux. 1.K.. D.F. Borthwick. H.H. Ham matt. and M.O. Orr. 1997.Archaeological Reconnaissance Surrct o/ - Kcannkah l Military Reseryathm, .South Hilo 11l11i'iel, Hanoi l Island (Hawai'1 ,atiunal iliiord) 503.6-aero parcel. '/MK: 2-1-12:3 and 2-1-13:10. Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Kailua, Hl. Gagne. \V., and L. Cuddihv. 1990. "Vegetation." pp.45-114 in \V.L. Wagner, D.R. Herbst.and S.H. Sohmer. eds., Manual of the Flowering Plants of 11em•ai'1. 2 vols. Honolulu: Universay of Hawai"i Press. Giambelluca,T.W., Q. Chen. A.G. Frazier.J.P. Price, Y.-L. Chen. P.-S. Chu.J.K. Eischeid,and D.M. Delparte, 2013: Online Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii. Bull.Amer. Meteor. Soc.,doi: 10.1 175/BA.MS-D-1 1-00228.1. Handy,E.S.C.,and E.G. Handy. 1972.Native Planters in Old Hawaii: Their Life,Lore, and Environment. B.P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 233. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. 1-lawai'i County Department of Public Works(DPW). 2009. Final Lm'iro tenter!Assessment Jar Fire Administration ,Support Complex.Prep. by M&E Pacific. Inc., for DP\V. 1-Iawai`i County Department of Public Works(DPW). 2009. final Ent'ironmental4ssessment for Fire Adininisiration Support Complex.Prep. by M&E Pacific. Inc., for DPW. Hawai`i County Planning Department.2005. The General P1cm, Comte'ofHcnrai'1. Hilo. Hawaii State Department of Land and Natural Resources(DLN.R). 2017.Rapid 'Ohl"a Death: Part 1:Strategic Response PlanforHmrai'i, 2017-2019. Prep. by Division ofForestiy & Wildlife. Honolulu. Heliker,C. 1990. h'alcanic and Seismic Hazards on the Island oJ'1-lani'ai'1. Washington: U.S. GPO. Howarth F.G,2002.An assessment of the conservation stains oldie terrestrial cave Janna occurring on the Islands of Maui and Malo a'l, Haim]'i.Honolulu, (I-iI): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,Pacific islands Office. Kamakau,S. 1961.Ruling Chiefs.of l-Jawai'i.Honolulu:The Kamehameha Schools Press. Kelly,M. :198!."Archaeological and Historical Studies for the A lcnaio Stream Flood Damage Reduction Study, 1-lilo Hawaii.Report 1. Background History." Department of Anthropology,B.P.Bishop Museum,Honolulu. Prepared for U.S.Amy Engineer District,Pacific Ocean. Kelly,M.,.B.Nakamura,and Dorothy Barrere. 1981.A Chronological Hisrorv, Land cued Water Use.in the Hilo Bay Area. Island ofHmi•ai'i.Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press. Maly,K. 1996a. Appendix 1n: "Archaeological Assessment Study Hilo Judiciary Complex Project, Lands of\Vainaku, Ponohawai.Pi'ihonua. and Waiakea,South Hilo District, Island of Hawai`i (MIK: 2-6-15:1,2;2-6-16:2;2-4-49:15,.19: 2-2-15:33;2-41:12)."Paul H.Roscndahl, Inc., Hilo. PI-IRI Report 1721-061496. Prepared for State of Hawaii, Honolulu. . 1996b. Historical Documentcn-v Research and Oral Histo;t'Interviews, Waialce a Cane Lots (12, 13,. 17, 1$, 19, 20 c4 2041.Hilo:Kumu Pono Associates. McEldowney,H. 1979. ` Archaeological and Historical Literature Search and Research Design: Lava Flow Control Study,Hilo Flawai'i."Manuscript on file,Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division. Page 43 • Hale Ola 0 1Llphoilli 4ffordahle Housing Environmental Assessment Mitchell. C. C. Ogura. DW, Meadows.A. Kane. L. Strommer,S. Fret/. D. Leonard.and A_ McClung.2005. Hawaii's Comprehensive fri ('otiservation Strategy. Hawaii State Department of Land and Natural Resources. Honolulu. Hawaii. Mon 1992.Summary of Prior Archacolouical Work: Hisifiricul aftui Archaeological...-rittlicsi) tf'Lord 1. Nc7 ono' Seitlemem Walakeo Ahttpucro. Hilo. UH Anthropoloy 645. Historic Preserk ation, Fall 1992, Honolulu. Pukui, M.K., Elbert, S.H., and E.T. Mookini. 1976. Mace Names'of Hawaii. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. Slay. M.E., Porter,M.L.,Slay,C., Engel, A.S.2018."Preliminary results from a survey of lava tube caves in the southwest region of the Ka'0 district Of the Big Island, Hawai'i.-24th International Conference on Subterranean Biology, 20-24 August 2018, ARPHA Conference Abstracts I: c29874. https://doi.ore/10.3897/aca.l.c29874. U.S.Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).2016.Final Guidance pt.Federal Depariments and Agencies on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions'and the ISects of Climate Change in National Environmental Policy Act RePiews. Guidance dated August 1,2016,signed by C. Goldfuss,CEQ. U.S.Dept.of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration,Bureau of the Census,2010, http:Pfactlinder2.census.aovf. U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. USTWS'Endangered Species Home Page. lutps://www.rws.goviendangcred/. U.S. Geological Survey(USGS). 2000. .S'eismic Hazard.illaps HUIrall.By F.W.Klein,A.D.'Franke], C.S.Mueller, R.L.Wesson and P.G. Okubo. U.S.Soil Conservation Service. 1973.Soil Surrey of Island of 1-lanai 1, Slate of Hawai'i, Washington: U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. University of Hawaii at Hilo,Dept. of Geography. 1998.Alias of Hawaii. 3rd ed.Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. University ofHawai‘i at Ivlanoa.Sea Grant College PrOgram. 2014. (7imaie,Change Impacts in Hawaii-A sty of climate change and its impacts to Hawai 15 ecosystems and communities. UNTH1-SEAGRANT-TT-12-04. Wolfe, E.W.,and J. Morris. 1996. Geologic Map of the Island Hawai USGS Misc. Investigations Series Map i- 2524-A. Washington,D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey. Page 44 Hole 01a 0:Whop')Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project Draft Environmental Assessment APPENDIX la Comments in Response to Early Consultation f'his page intentionally left hianl:1 geometrician ASSOCIATES , LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com April 20, 2021 Dear Neighbor or Agency/Organization Official: Subject: Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project, TAU((3) 2-4-001:168 (9.091 acres), South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii Our firm is in the process of preparing an Environmental Assessment(EA) for a proposed activity proposing use of government land, in compliance with Chapter 343, Hawaii Revised Statues (HAR.), and Title 11, Chapter 200.1, Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR). The property is State land under Executive Order to the County of Hawai`i that is under lease to the Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (I-IICDC) for affordable housing uses. The exact nature of the 90-unit maximum affordable housing and the layout of the facilities on the property have not yet been determined, but there is sufficient information to examine environmental impacts and 1 designate mitigation measures to avoid, reduce or compensate for any impacts. The property is currently within the State Land Use Agricultural District and is zoned by the County of Flawai`i for Agriculture. As such, the affordable housing project will require a State Laud Use District Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone. The property is situated in a growing urban neighborhood of•Hilo near three elderly housing projects and an adult day center, the planned Fire and Police Dispatch Center, and the Sunrise Estates subdivision. The property is forested land on the 1881 lava flow, and an archaeological survey has determined that no historic sites are present. The .EA will include a biological survey, a Traffic Impact Assessment Report, and various other evaluations. I would appreciate your comments on any special environmental conditions or impacts related to the project. Please contact me at(808) 969-7090 or email to rterry@hawaii.rr.com if you have any questions or require clarification. Kindly indicate whether you wish to receive notice of EA availability when it has been completed. Sincerely, • Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates • Location Map -*$i �`#F ... sir �f �.+r. 4 r � �, a.7' is Ham .+. * 7. ' i'� i \ WI'_ i „". A '.„« • --' .. ----- ..,,..-9, "' ,,t _ / Property f ✓-"' ��v fi ,,� , Co lt zP , 6 r. k' y N „ 1 .L VA.i.4,,if 2y f•k �.. g '' Yr Y 1'y... r".—W !`3 "s,. `4_' u f7'./7,1,1 .4.7 a {^ 9r o 'cffy*...r+r **' �� + 7L! r' � � ��a�.�. Y �K�; .,s;•`,,.� ."'°f�Y., � � �"` ., Base Map , Google Earth North T Mitchell D. Rotlt `Y Oa � Paul K. Ferreira lhirnr ' nlrce• c'lnr; A!ti-sit r • - Kenneth Pau„ado Jr. DeUuh Polite Clue! County of Hawai ' POLICE DEPARTMENT 349 Kapi'ciani Street • I lila-liauai'i 96720-3998 (803)935-331 t • Fax(303}961-2389 April 28, 2021 Mr. Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates; LLC 10 Hina Street Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Mr. Terry: SUBJECT: EARLY CONSULTATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT, TMK (3) 2-4-001:168 (9.091 ACRES), SOUTH HILO DISTRICT, ISLAND OF HAWAII Staff has reviewed the above-referenced documents and has no comments at this time. • If you have anyquestions, please contact Captain Reed Mahuna, Commander of the South Hilo Division, at (808) 961-2214 or via e-mail at reed.mahuna@hawaiicounty.gov. Sincerely, �1f�1 'S 'CONNUK' J ” SSISTAN CHIEF AREA I OPERATIONS RM:11if21 HQ0389 "Hnwei County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer' Mitchell D. Roth • �`v oo ''sq,•5 Zendo Kern ,Mtrvor � r, (( L•t;4y Director ' 13 Lee E. Lord ✓ Jeffrey W. Darrow illanaging Director ardh • *; Deputy Director. Mist Hawaii Office East Hawaii Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole HwyA •6 i 101 f acahi Street,Suite 3 Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 Countyof M4'a a� Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)323-4770 Phone(808)961.8288 Fax(808)327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax(808)961-8742 June 1, 2021 Mr. Ron Terry • Principal Geometrician Associates 10 Hina Street Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Mr, Terry; SUBJECT: Request for Early Environmental Assessment Comments for an Affordable Housing Project Applicant: Hawai`i Island Community Development Corporation Tax Map I{ey: (3) 2-4-001:168 This is in response to your letter receieved by this office on April 23, 2021, requesting early consultation for an Environmental Assessment (BA) that is being prepared in accordance with the County's requirements for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone Application. According to your letter, the applicant is planning'to build a 90-unit maximum, affordable housing project to be situated on the subject parcel. Land Use Designations For your information, the subject parcel is located within the County's Agricultural (A-la) zoning district and the State Land Use Agricultural district. The General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map identifies the area as Medium Density Urban. The subject parcel is 9.091 acres in size and is not located within the County's Special Management Area (SMA). The current landowner of record is the State of Flawai'i. Permitting History On October 23, 2020, the applicant, Hawai`i Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC), submitted a State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20- 000054) for the subject property to reclassify the State Land Use Boundary from Agriculture to Urban. • www,oanniny,hawaiicounti,2tty Hawaii County is an Equal Opporianity Provider and Employer Plannine,a hawaiicounty.inv • Mr. Ron Terry Geometrician Associates June 1, 2021 Page 2 • The applicant also plans to rezone the subject property via a HRS 2011-1 application process from Agricultural with a minimum lot size of 1 acre (A-1 a) to Multiple Family Residential with a minimum land area of 4,000 square feet (RM-4) zoning district. The reclassification of the State Land Use District and Zoning District would allow for the applicant to develop the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project. ✓ On January 6, 2021, the applicant requested a deferral of the State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20-000054) pending the completion of an Environmental Assessment. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and please also provide us with a copy of the Draft Environmental Assessment for our review and comment. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Tracie-Lee Cantero at (808)-961-8166. Sincerely, .01)11. - ZENDO KERN '-`tri. Planning Director TC:jaa • \'CORD Ilplanning'public\wpwin60';Tracie\Letters'DEA`•.LGeomeiricianAssociatesLLC-PreEA Comments-2400 1.168.doc From:Tim Keller<lazyk51@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 19, 2021 12:28 PM To: rterry@hawaii.rr.com Subject: EA FOR TMK (3) 2-4-001:168 AFFORDABLE HOUSING HILO Mr. Terry Sorry for the late response, but we just returned from a month long trip to the mainland. In response to your letter dated April 20, 2021 for comments on any environmental conditions or impacts, we have a few commnets. 1. Control measures in the prevention of any potential Rapid Ohia Death (ROD) spread onto our properties while clearing land. 2. Dust control measures to minimize dust clouds flowing onto our property which would impact cost of pool maintenance during your construction project. 3. Pest Control: mitigating ferral pigs and rodents migration onto our property due to loss of habitat. Note: the pigs have already dug up our back yard and we have had to pay to hire someone to trap pigs. The rats and chickens as well will be looking for new homes. 4. Traffic Management Plan: While we know you have said a traffic study was conducted and the plan was to have one way traffic out of the new road leading on to Mohouli. We take issue with this finding/recommendation. For one, merging traffic onto a limited visability road due to curvature of the road is an accident waiting to happen. Plus you have alot of walkers and bike rides that use the shoulder. the flow of that traffic would head to an already intersection to cross (Mohouli and Kukuau) especially during key traffic times, 7-9AM, 11AM-1 PM AND 3-6PM Rush Hour traffic. You also now have added traffic turning onto Kukuau to cut through subdivision to head to town. We have neighbors on both sides of us with young children and speeding vehicles passing by our house is already a problem and it will only get worse with the additional traffic. Lovina Sabnani and Tim Keller 847 Kukuau St. Hilo, HI 96720 Mitchell D. Roth J YY O! - Kazuo S.K.L. Todd - � �, �' "� Fire Chief Mayor Lee E. Lord r1/anagrng Direclor County of Tbalatail HAWAII FIRE DEPARTMENT 25 Aupuni Street•Suite 2501•Hilo.Flawai'i 96720 (808)932-2900•Fax(808)932-2928 May 18, 2021 Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates, LLC P.O. Box 396 Hilo, Hawai`i 96721 Dear Mr. Ron Terry: SUBJECT: Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project TMK(3) 2-4-001:168 (9.091 acres), South Hilo District, Island of Hawai`i We are in receipt of your letter dated April 20, 2021 in regards Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project. • The Hawaii Fire Department would like to receive notice of EA availability. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact my office at(808)932-2911. Mahalo, KAZUO S.K.L. TODD Fire Chief I . KV/ds 1104 ) 111 Nawar'i County is an Equal Opportanily Prounkr and Employer. SW-ANNE D.CASE CU klEIVERSON DAVID Y.LGE r'{ ROARD OF LAND,tND NATURAL RESOURCES GOV2fiNO OF HAwA.! TIOTA I$SION ON%%ATER RFSOL'RCF. Ni NAGiiN2EN1 4 ann. ;?*:t::,1'-':!_ t1 ,,,ittrli* 1.‘„1„(fL l`'L^`/ ry " � STATE OF HAWAII rv,p `.,t+ia+,^T--''� DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND UIV[SION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96609 May 21, 2021 Geometrician Associates, LLC Attention: Mi.,Ron Terry via email: rterry@hawaIi.moo m P.O, Box 396 Hilo, Hawaii 96721 Dear Mr. Terry: SUBJECT: Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project located at South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4- 001:168(9.091 acres)on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Land Division of the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR)distributed or made available a copy of your request pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR's Divisions for their review and comments. At this time, enclosed are comments from the (a) Engineering Division, (b) Commission on Water Resource Management, and (c) Land Division-Hawaii District on the subject matter, Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at(808) 587-0417 or email: darlene.k.nakamura( hawaii.gov. Thank you. Sincerely, Russell Tsuji Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures cc: Central Files i SUZANNE 0 CASE i.1.1RPERSO. 4t71.7.7N.! K'MAN A SEWER PH D . ' MICHAEL 0 BUCK ‘a 40 /0 ELIZABETH A CHAR M NEIL J HANNAHS WANE K KATA'y AMA PAUL J MEYER M KALEO MANUEL STATE OF HAWAII r.EPYTY 7{, DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT EQ BOX 621 HONOLULU HAWAII n1300 May 19,2021 REF: RFD.5658.8 TO Mr. Russell Tsuji,Administrator Land Division FROM. M. Kaleo Manuel, Deputy Director .16)4<re Commission on Water Resource Management SUBJECT Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project,South Hilo (Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation) FILE NO.: RFD.5658.8 TMK NO.: (3)2-4-001:168 Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject document. The Commission on Water Resource Management(CWRM)is the agency responsible for administering the State Water Code(Code). Under the Code, al! waters of the State are held in trust for the benefit of the citizens of the State, therefore all water use is subject to legally protected water rights. CWRM strongly promotes the efficient use of Hawaii's water resources through conservation measures and appropriate resource management. For more information,please refer to the State Water Code, Chapter 174C,Hawaii Revised Statutes,and Hawaii Administrative Rules,Chapters 13-167 to 13-171. These documents are available via the Internet at htto://dinnhawaii.gov/cwrrn. Our comments related to water resources are checked off below. X 1. We recommend coordination with the county to incorporate this project into the county's Water Use and — Development Plan, Please contact the respective Planning Department and/or Department of Water Supply for further information. Fl2. We recommend coordination with the Engineering Division of the State Department of Land and Natural Resources to incorporate this project into the State Water Projects Plan, Li 3. We recommend coordination with the Hawaii Department of Agriculture(HDOA)to incorporate the reclassification of agricultural zoned land and the redistribution of agricultural resources into the State's Agricultural Water Use and Development Plan(AWUDP). Please contact the HDOA for more information. X 4. We recommend that water efficient fixtures be installed and water efficient practices implemented throughout the development to reduce the increased demand on the area's freshwater resources. Reducing the water usage of a home or building may earn credit towards Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design(LEED)certification. More information on LEED certification is available at http://www.usgbc orgileed. A listing of fixtures certified by the EAP as having high water efficiency can be found at http://www.epa.gov/watersense. X 5. We recommend the use of best management practices(BMP)for stormwater management to minimize the impact of the project to the existing area's hydrology while maintaining on-site infiltration and preventing polluted runoff from storm events. Stormwater management BMPs may earn credit toward LEED certification. More information on stormwater BMPs can be found at http//planning.hawaii.goviczmfinitiatives/low-impact-developmentd IX S. We recommend the use of alternative water sources,wherever practicable. 7. We recommend participating in the Hawaii Green Business Program,that assists and recognizes businesses that strive to operate in an environmentally and socially responsible manner.The program description can be found online at http://energy.hawaii.gov/green-business-program. M8. We recommend adopting landscape irrigation conservation best management practices endorsed by the Landscape Industry Council of Hawaii.These practices can be found online at Mr. Russell Tsuji Page 2 May 19,2021 http:l/www.hawaiiscape.comlwp-contenUupioadsl2013/04ILICH_Irrigation_Conservation_BMPs.pdf. 1 9 There may be the potential for ground or surface water degradation/contamination and recommend that approvals for this project be conditioned upon a review by the State Department of Health and the developer's acceptance of any resulting requirements related to water quality. 10 The proposed water supply source for the project is located in a designated water management area, and a Water Use Permit is required prior to use of water. The Water Use Permit may be conditioned on the requirement to use dual line water supply systems for new industrial and commercial developments. I 11 A Well Construction Permit(s)is(are)are required before the commencement of any well construction work. 12 A Pump Installation Permit(s)is(are)required before ground water is developed as a source of supply for the project. [1 13 There is(are)well(s)located on or adjacent to this project. If wells are not planned to be used and will be affected by any new construction, they must be properly abandoned and sealed. A permit for well • abandonment must be obtained. .14 Ground-water withdrawals from this project may affect streamflows,which may require an instream flow standard amendment. C,1 15 A Stream Channel Alteration Permit(s)is(are)required before any alteration can be made to the bed and/or banks of a steam channel. 16 A Stream Diversion Works Permits)is(are)required before any stream diversion works is constructed or altered. 17 A Petition to Amend the Interim Instream Flow Standard is required for any new or expanded diversion(s) of surface water, 18 The planned source of water for this project has not been identified in this report. Therefore,we cannot determine what permits or petitions are required from our office,or whether there are potential impacts to water resources. IX 1 OTHER: Planning-The proposed water source(s)and projected water demands for the project, both potable and non-potable,should be identified and the calculations used to estimate demands should be provided. A discussion of the potential impacts on water resources and other public trust uses of water should be included,and any proposed mitigation measures described. Water conservation and efficiency measures to be implemented should also be discussed. If you have any questions, please contact Neal Fujii of the Commission staff at 587-0216. SUZANNE.U.CASE CIIALRVERSON DAVID Y.IGE BOARD Of'I.AVII AND NA RJRA.Rf:SOURCES (.10.EANC.1i COM:ALSSIU.Y ON W.tTI;R RESOURCE AIAN.t GEMENT . t # _ ...�V - STATE OF HAWAII ,= DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION LD/Russell V. Tsuji Ref: Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project Location: South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii TMK(s): (3) 2-4-001:168 (9.091 acres) Applicant: Geometrician Associates, LLC on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) COMMENTS The rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44CFR), are in effect when development falls within a Special.Flood Hazard Area (high-risk areas). State projects are required to comply with 44CFR regulations as stipulated in Section 60.12. Be advised that 44CFR 4CFi r :fcci5 the minimum standards as set forth by the NFIP. Local community flood ordinances may stipulate higher standards that can be more restrictive and would take precedence over the minimum NFIP standards. The owner of the project property and/or their representative is responsible to research the Flood Hazard Zone designation for the project. Flood Hazard Zones arc designated on FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), which can be viewed on our Flood Hazard Assessment Tool (FHAT) (http://gis.hawaiinfip.org/FHAT). If there are questions regarding the local flood ordinances, please contact the applicable County NFIP coordinating agency below: o Oahu: City and County of Honolulu, Department of Planning and Permitting (808) 768-8098. o Hawaii .Island: County of Hawaii, Department of PublicWorks (808) 961-8327. o Maui/Molokai/'Lanai County of Maui, Department of Planning (808) 270-7253. o Kauai: County of Kauai, Department of Public Works (808) 241-4896. Signed: CARTY S. CHANG, CHIEF ENGINEER Date: May 12,2021 4/1, StliANNE D.CASE DAVIO OIAIRPERSOV BOA RE>Of 1AN1)AW NA !nut RESOEIRCVS CONIMISSION ON WAVES RESOURCE MANAGEMENT •;,% STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTNIENT OF LAND AND NATURAL.RESOt RC:ES LAND DivisfoN POS OFFICE BOX 521 110N01.1,Lk 968')'? April 26, 2021 MEMORANDUM TO: DLNR Agencies: _Div. of Aquatic Resources Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation 'X Engineering Division (DLNR.ENGRatiawaii.gov) X Div. of Forestry &Wildlife (rubvrosa.t.terraochawaii.gov) Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management(DLNR.CWRM( hawail.qov) Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands X Land Division— Hawaii District (oordon.c.heit(@,hawail.qov) FROM: Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator' 15-5611 ISUJI SUBJECT: Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project LOCATION: South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3)2-4-001:168(9.091 acres) APPLICANT: Geometrician Associates, LLC on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. Please submit comments by May 20, 2021. If no response is received by the above date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions about this request,please contact Darlene Nakamura at darlene.k.nakamura(CO,hawaii.gov. Thank you. ( ) We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. ( ) We have no additional comments. ( tr.( Comments are attached. Signed: Print Name: ______&‘212,Le2/1.)_.C., • Division: 0/./.---7J/ /) Date: Attachments cc: Central Files SiEL AN.SF.D.CASE vID IGE CIIAMPERSON 4C, HOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL iESOlISCCS CO',IMISSION ON WATER RF-SOURC:E MANAGEMENT Z• STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT Or LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION 75 Aummi Street,Room 204 ' Hi/o, kuvall 96720 Pf ION(' (80E)951-9590 FAX (808)961-9599 May 11, 2021 MEMORANDUM TO: Russell Y. Tsuji, AdminiStrator • FROM: Gordon C. Heit, Hawaii District Land SUBJECT: Early Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project LOCATION: Waiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii, TMK: (3)2-1-001:168 • APPLICANT: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (.HICDC) Pursuant to your request for comments on the above matter, we offer the following: The property identified by TMK: (3)2-1-001:168 is currently encumbered under Executive Order No's. 4531 to the County of Hawaii for Elderly and/or Affordable Rental Housing and Related Purposes. The project described is consistent with the executive order and the Hawaii District Land Office has no objection to the proposed project. Please contact me should you have any questions. 10,41, • , V •,a• 31,4 IA r4 DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY COUNTY OF HAWAVI 345 KEKCiANAA STREET, SUITE 20 • HILO, HAWAII 96720 - TELEPHONE (808)961-8050 • FAX (808)961-8657 June 10, 2021 Mr. Ron Testy Geometrician Associates, LLC P.O. Box 396 Hilo, 1-1I 96721 Dear Mr. Terry: Subject: Pre-Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii Tax Map Key 2-4-001:168 This is in response to your Pre -Environmental Assessment letter dated April 20, 2021. Please be informed that there is an existing 12-inch waterline along Mohouli Street fronting the subject parcel or an existing 12-inch waterline along Kupuna Place. Prior to issuing a water commitment for the proposed project,the Department will request estimated maximum daily water usage calculations, prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawai'i, for review and approval. After review of the calculations, the Department will determine a water commitment deposit amount, prevailing facilities charge (subject to change)to be paid, and any water system improvements required for final approval. Construction plans showing the proposed water system improvements must also be submitted for review and approval. Please be informed that the existing 12-inch waterlines within both roadways are adequate to provide 2,000 gallons per minute for fire protection,as required per the Department's Water System Standards. Any meter(s) serving the proposed project will require the installation of a reduced principle type backflow prevention assembly within five (5) feet of the meter on private property. The Department must inspect and approve the installation prior to commencement of water service. We have no additional comments on any special environmental conditions. „ Water; Our Wost Trecious Pssolirce, , , Kjz Wai nine The Department of Water Supply is ara Equal Opportunity provider and employer. N1r. Ron Terry Page 2 June 10. 2021 Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Ryan Quitoriano of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070, extension 256. Sincerely yours. G4/1/1/4,4 Keith K. Okamoto, P.E. Manager-Chief Engineer RQ:dfg copy--Mr. Keith Kato, Hawai`i Island Community Development Corporation Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project Draft Environmental Assessment APPENDIX lb Comments to Draft EA and Responses P4)8+ea'342551 Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Attn: Mr.Keith Kato 100 Pauahi Street, Suite 20 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 RE: Hale 0 Mohouli 90-unit affordable housing Dear Mr. Kato, Considering the published newspaper update to the planned housing in downtown Hilo yesterday, we are wondering the design as shown in the EIS with associated price-tag are finalized? Our reason for contacting is many-fold: With the definition of "affordable" housing in Hawaii remaining a mystery to me in light at the here proposed price-tag with a per unit cost coming in at roughly $ 522,000.00, requiring a median income to above $ 75,000 for anybody wishing to rent to meet ROI. This precludes a considerable amount of people while still not offering any "true affordable" solution to Hawaii's ongoing problem. The increasing amount of 'homelessness' is indicative of said concerning trend. FYI, I have for over 30-years traveled through Hawaii and onward, thus familiar with this issue not only on the Big Island. We sold our dwelling in HPP earlier this year - seeking retreat to American Samoa in view to ever-increasing traffic & commercialization contributing to losing the 'Aloha' island appeal. 1. The 'pocket design' while costly, lacks any renewable aspects as mandated. 2. half-hearted past approaches leave the community struggling with ever increase municipal household & construction waste being generated. f{ j}54;E.41 LIC• PO Bo 0F2i51 9!744 3. construction waste into landfill makes for a significant portion, leaving transfer stations struggle with its increasing daily trucking to the Kona side for landfilling. What if- we were to offer you/Hawaii a turnkey, modular solution at the fraction of the here proposed cost to realizing a sustainable and in many aspects more environmentally sound, more cost-effective dwelling/multi-dwelling solution? • One that arrives at Hilo port for trucking on a prepared site for set-up, with all services arranged underground "Plug & Play" in place for quick hook-up? • One that comes with an integrated R E solution into central storage, aside EV recharge infrastructure to promote electric car usage. • One that does not require construction waste to landfilling. • One that offers affordable to "true low-income" folks. • One that comes complete with furniture & appliances, filtration AC, double pane windows/heavy sliders and appropriate insulation/high-end vanity's/ wired for WIF1 and ceiling speakers. • One that comes with cement outside cladding and decking from recycled plastic composites - a perfect no-maintenance solution for Hilo's wet climate. • One that offers a modern & contemporary in-and outside community appeal and colors • One that offers multiple glass elevators, specially laid-out units with access to accommodate wheelchair/handicapped folks. • One that offers an integrated 'Building Information Modeling' (BIM) in digital 3D - offering building maintenance a true tool to fix & address any issue in the shortest of time. • One that offers in view of the beforementioned a 10-year structural warranty, otherwise unheard of in Hawaii! 4 One that carries a turnkey project price-tag under < USD $ 20M 2 ASRL�MI LLC i : P4)4449.4.9S25;1 4449494P.441.4.4.19 • One with a project realization within/under < 12-months form time of project "go" to move-in, assuming site prep-work completed in the meantime. • One that withstands any seismic / inclement weather event - due its 'strong-box' steel design. • One that exceeds the planned amenities utilizing 'smart' building concept While in Quarantine in Honolulu - as part of ASG repatriation program in June, I was able to elevate the concept to,Lt. Josh Greene as an alternative to Hawaii' lack of "true affordable housing." We are currently working with the local ASG government on sustainable 300 x ppl, 3 x story Quarantine multi-center complexes, including renewable energies, kitchen, and Laboratory facilities on 5-acres. The whole project is ASTM/UL compliant with world-wide installations ranging from Miami, FL. to Scandinavia, Europe, HK, across Asia, Emirates and close to us, in New Zealand of special interest after recent earthquakes. Our firm has the Oceania 'exclusive' marketing including for Hawaiian Islands thus prepositioned to help the project execution along being familiar with the lay- of-the-land. Below are a few of pics, including of award-winning projects, that not knowing they are of the here proposed 'modular' nature —would otherwise be hard to recognize as such. 3 4.• ASTiENI 1.1..C. PI)HO'S W12151 07 q 1 ,' ,,....„ ...... lit ; ..., ...1 1 lomoloor...a4 . t , . 1 . ! .., 4111 ... .. . „. i MI ..- , • / '5, '''' itasat , . ...., ,,, .... 1,..i4,.' ''''" • '''.-6. .. , '•,,,,,,* ' , .i'..,': .';.''' 1 ',,,',,,..*; ,:-,,' "..-,... .,....,-":""''''...7 tit ‘4'1$'", ,. ,, ... „. .. -•-' 't - . . • „ ,,- ,,„ .' - -, ,., „,. ..... ...... ., . ttellMT. . '-' 4,.. . .. I 1111 ,,Alirc 4 al ........1 , _......_ ....„ liblor — i ,. ...„,,,. „.,,......, .c.,r:,,,,, ,..., •.7'Vt: -, ..tt.:.-' -,t ',..k.„:. , , , .,,, ,,,.,...:--t.,.4. , , ,.- " 4 . '",,v, - . .. ,.. . , . 4 [ ,S;o, ASREM tie. ..... PO Bo 9S2351 P.tgo-PAgo,.1.s 9o7O9 *II . .311- g-.- .-.....,...... jp..0.0"1 ,i- •vv, • ,' -„,,,r_____--.---.0 r .,?.,.-«:.1,..,;.-,1.4,:',7. rs MO SIM III ,2 11111 I ... . . •. .. . . . , ,, ,, ,,. . ., . t' ..--.._-el:. **,, z,.•.-.A: .... . , , , . - --- „:....-_,--1,.....,',*• .:',' _,•-• .... :44-, •:'''',,Ii...'''..• _. `Aii4.', H . A'-''''',..— .' . ., --..-- '7', ';.:1:, ,'•I''''',:..1/,;.. • ---i..,;;.- ,,,t,..'•,;4"..'-;`,Az.,... '1'. , .. . 1 f ,.. - • - - -. •:' ' ''....' 1 r ',.. V ,,,:1 .$, ' .--. ilw ,li i ' ii ,., . ftliset -;,,, ci , if ' , ' % ' tf.i, ,,-„;.0 4 -„„,,,,i,,,4.2,...... ..• 1,.',X;'-''' '1111"0- it,-",.. ‘'..;4 ,:. '!. I . . ...t -.... ..., ,- . Jr 5 ASRE4I LIC. I II 84,r 9s25'i1 799 G +3-. I ?tea ' mum Ike Since the project seems to rely on 'County funding' to get executed, we can offer a re-design in both concept & cost, given the use of the existing site —to provide 3D / color renderings towards a more economical & sustainable approach, leaving funding available for yet other projects? Should this be of interest —we are happy to discuss details at your convenience, whereby I can be reached via here e-mail, or my mobile at: +1(684)782-3383. Mahalo & regards, Chris Thi nken; ENG. Managing Partner 6 From:Chris Thunken<chris@greenglobesolutions.energy> Sent: Monday,August 30, 2021 7:58 AM To: keith.hicdc@gmail.com - Cc:Tracie-Lee.Camero@!;awaiicounty.gov; rterry@hawaii.rr.com; mitchellroth@yaboo.com Subject: Mohouli proposed 90-unit 'affordable' housing on TMI<(3) 2-4-001:168 ...resending August 30, 2021/no response! Aloha Keith, Making contact to see interest to pursue an alternative dwelling solution away from traditional 'lumber &mortar' and in view to ever escalating resource pricing& availability-towards a modular,turnkey significantly in cost reduced option, at a fraction of the going$/sgft. rate in Hawaii. It is faster to realize, better suited to withstand any seismic or inclement weather events at much reduced maintenance. 'Our attached PDF letter goes into more detail/specifics with interest to offer Hawaii a truly alternative housing solution that conies with a 10-year structural warranty. This here 90-unit project would be a perfect 'show-piece'to rewrite the local housing market. Affordable multi-plex shelters for the homeless could realistically address the ever growing humanitarian crises at a fraction of the cost.Another show-piece for Hawaii and to lead the way in the pacific. Looking forward to hearing from you—I remain, With best regards, CHRIS geometrician ASSOCIATES , LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geometricianassociates.com September 17,2021 Chris Th unken Chris('.greenglobesolutions.energy Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA), Hale Ola 0 \'lotionli Affordable Housing Project, Island of Hawaii,TiM.K(3) 2-4-00.1:168 Dear Mr. Thunken: Thank you for your comment emails dated August 11 and 30.2021, which also included an undated letter to Keith Kato, Executive Director of the Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HiCDC). In answer to your specific comments: 1. Is design set? Would project proponent be willing to ...-pursue an alternative dwelling.volution away from traditional 'lumber d mortar'and in view to ever escalating resource pricing d cwarilahilin-- ioirorcls a modular, nu-like);sign]]icantly in cost reduced option, cit a.fiactiol, of the going S/.1'd ft, rate in Hawaii. It isf tstei' to realize, better cu/ted to withstand any seismic or inclement weather events at much reduced maintenance. 4/orclable multi-plea shelters fbr the homeless could realistically address the ever growing humanitarian crises til ci fraction of the cost. Another show-piece,for Hawaii and to lead the wait'in the pacific." The basic design concept and scale of the project have been set; however, the particulars of the project are subject to change in order to meet budgetary and final design requirements. HiCDC's experience is that the chosen development concepts creates attractive living conditions for both seniors and families. HICDC is looking into the feasibility of modular construction for this project, but it is too early to determine whether it will be practical. 2. ;iSRL•rbidesign better suited to withstand any seismic or inclement weallier even/s at much reduced maintenance. The final project will be designed to meet all seismic,wind and structural requirements of the Building Code. 1-iICDC is familiar with the maintenance requirements and will be designing the project to minimize unnecessary maintenance costs. • 3. Pocket design, while costly, lacks any renewable aspects as mandated, The proposed project will meet all mandates for sustainable development. 4. Kalf hearted past approaches leave the community struggling with ever increase municipal household c constrilclion waste being generated We differ from your interpretation that past efforts by agencies and non-profits have been half-hearted. There are many obstacles to building affordable housing, but HICDC alone has constructed 742 affordable housing • units and has another C)O units in the development process. I-lale Ola O \Vlohoulr will be a significant contribution to die goal of satisfying East Hawai'i's need tbr affordable housing. We very much appreciate your re\ie\\ of the Draft E;\. If you have any questions. please contact me at (S08) 09-7090. Sincerely. Ron Terry. Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato, H]CDC: Tracie-Lee Camera,I-Ia\vai`i County Planning StlZAVNE D.CASE, DAVID Y.ICE • _ CHAIRPERSON G^.bERFNR CF F44Ylk!i U0.I O Of I.AND AND NATCkAL RESOURCES Cr111Al1S\ION ON VV.l'rER H_SOI.P.r F ,'l\N 10E' EN'l- g 1 f*-1A li) 'I STATE OF HAWAII s " DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES _„r,,sa LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 521 HONOLULU.HAWAII 96809 September 7, 2021 County of Hawaii Planning Department Attn: Ms. Tracie-Lee Camero via email: tracie-lee.camero(chawaiicounty.gov 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Camero: SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing located at South Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2- 4-001:168 on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Land Division of the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) distributed or made available a copy of your request pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR"s Divisions for their review and comments. At this time, enclosed are comments from the (a) Engineering Division and CO) Land Division-Hawaii District on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (808) 587-0417 or email: darlene.k.nakamuraAhawaii.gov. Thank you. Sincerely, Russell .Tsuji Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures cc: Central Files Geometrician Associates, LLC (w/copies) Atten: Mr. Ron Terry (via email: rterry c(�hawaii.rr.com) S UEA E O.CASE C!!AtRI':itSON DAVID Y.IGe ' UOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ,OVLP:Or,OF 1-0,,W.11 COMMISSION ON,VAVFER RESOURCE ‘IANACE.NESY _,,,,,, r.,1 a.^ `r1ao N,r' Ll '\_„ -yT — 7 STATE OF HAWAII ma;= , DEPARTMENT OF LAND.AND NATURAL lRESUtRCGSf LAND DIVISION POST'OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU.HAWAII %809 August 11, 2021 MEMORANDUM FROM: I TO: DLNR Agencies: ' Div. of Aquatic Resources Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation X Engineering Division (DLNR.ENGR(Thhawaii.gov) X Div. of Forestry &Wildlife (rubvrosa.t,terra_go@hawaii_gov) Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management (DLNR.CWRM(c.hawaii.gov) _Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands X Land Division—Hawaii District(gordon.c.heit a(�.hawaii.gov) TO: FROM Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator Ri,P a-rF4jG SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing LOCATION: South Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4-001:168 APPLICANT: Geometrician Associates on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. The DEA was published on August 8, 2021 by the State Environmental Review Program (formerly the Office of Environmental Quality Control) at the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development in the periodic bulletin, The Environmental Notice, available at the following link: http://oegc2.doh.hawaii.gov/The Environmental Notice/2021-08-08-TEN.pdf Please submit any comments by September 3, 2021. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions, please contact Darlene Nakamura directly via email at darlene.k.nakamura(a7hawaii.gov. Thank you. ( ) We have no objections, ( ) We have no comments. ( V) We have no additional comments. ( ) Comments a e attached. Signed: Print Name: Carty S. Chang, Chief Engineer Division: Engineering Division Date: Aug 31,2021 Attachments cc; Central Files r";i•,}'' SUZANNE U.CAS F. DAVID Y.tr; \'" CIIAIRi'EFl5ON Go`2r,,cii c.t:AWau . ._ ..il BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAI.RF-SOI RCFS yy CCAl IlSStON ON WATER RESOURCE 1:6:7:3)i3).{ .1ANAGElIFNT ▪ Iffy j▪ J STATE OF HAWAII DEP:\R'rmENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOL RC:ES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE IIOX h2I HONOLULU,HAWAII 9oS09 August 11, 2021 MEMORANDUM TO: DLNR Agencies: Div. of Aquatic Resources Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation X Engineering Division (DLNR,ENGR61),hawaii.gov) X Div. of Forestry & (r ubyr osa ter t ago(ahawaii.gov) Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management (DLNR.CWRMRhawaii.gov) _Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands X Land Division—Hawaii District (oordon.c.heit at hawaii.gov) FROM: Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator Rucss-d4 rc yge SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing LOCATION: South Hilo, Island of Hawaii;TMK: (3) 2-4-001:168 APPLICANT: Geometrician Associates on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. The DEA was published on August 8, 2021 by the State Environmental Review Program {formerly the Office of Environmental Quality Control) at the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development in the periodic bulletin, The Environmental Notice, available at the following link: http://oegc2:doh.hawaii.gov/The Environmental Notice/2021-08-08-TEN.pdf Please submit any comments by September 3, 2021. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions, please contact Darlene Nakamura directly via email at darlene.k.nakamuraPhawaii.gov. Thank you. { ✓) We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. ( ) We have no additional comments. ( ) Comments are attached. Signed: Print Name: (3 0R OPV G. /;//L'/ Division: c ,^ —)/ V/ c/ Date: - ?—f Attachments cc: Central Files geometrician • ASS O C IAT E S . LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geometricianassociates.com September 17. 2021 Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator Hawai`i DLNR Land Division P.O. Box 621 Honolulu, Hawaii 96809 Dear Mr. Tsuji: Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project, Island of Hawaii,TIMK(3) 2-4-001:168 Thank you for your comment letter dated September 7, 2021. transmitting comments from various divisions of DLNR. We hereby acknowledge the ]lo-Coi ineni, ]lo-c]cfGhiIon[!I coflimenl.C, or no-oiifeciwns from Hawai`i Island Land Division and the Engineering Division. We very much appreciate your circulating the EA for review by DLNR agencies. If you have any questions, please contact me at (808)969-7090. Sincerely, P196. 123ri • Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato, HICDC: Tracie-Lee Camero, Hawai`i County Planning Mori Ashley y To: Camera, Tracie-Lee Subject: RE: From: lex pen<lexpei- 08@,;niail.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 10, 2021 9:19 AM To:Camera,Tracie-Lee<Tr:=.ci_-Le .CameroE7phaiicouniy ov> Subject: Hello, I'm curious to know how putting an affordable housing unit smack dab in the middle of sunrise ridge is OK? How that fair for all the people that paid a very high premium to buy and build there, now have to have section 8 or low income neighbors??This is absulotely disgusting,and im sure just announcement this has already lowered the sunrise property values.There's tons of land elsewhere. How did you manage to pick the highest value neighborhood in all of Hilo town to build affordable housing units in and destroy peoples property values?? • • •, • geOmetrician ASS O C I A T E S , LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geometricianassociates.com • September 17, 2021 • Lexpen8080g,mail.com Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA), Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project,Island of Hawaii, MIK(3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Commenter: Thank you for your comment email dated August 10,2021. In answer to your specific comments: I. "1'm curious 10 know how pulling cm affordable housing unit smack club in the middle of sunrise ridge is OK? How that Airlbr all the people that paid a very high premiulnt to bun and build there, now have to have section 8 or loll'income neighbors?? This is abst.tlolelt'disgusting, and fin sure just announcement this has already lowered the sunrise property values. There's tons of land elsewhere. How did von manage to pick the highest value neighborhood in all of Hilo town to build ebrdable housing units in and destroy peoples property values??" First, the project is not located in the middle of Sunrise Ridge (or Sunrise Estates). It is located on adjacent State land. Affordable housing is a high priority at the national,State and County level.Low-income families and individuals are not undesirable land uses that need to be separated from well-off residents.There is no law, regulation or policy that requires geographic segregation of housing by income levels, and in fact, there are many laws that prohibit this. Several Mohouli Senior Housing affordable projects are already located just to the cast, also adjacent to Sunrise Ridge,and-this does not appear to have affected property values in this part of 1-lilo, which have soared in recent.years. Despite your contention that there is lots of land elsewhere,there are very few State properties with suitable characteristics in East Hawai`i. All necessary utilities are available,and for medical.government,social service_and recreational services and facilities are located nearby at various locations within central Hilo. We very much appreciate your review of the Draft EA. If you have any questions, please contact me at (808) 969-7090. Sincerely. "Rerk .CTI Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates 'Cc: Keith Kato,H.ICDC: Tracie-Lee Canero,:Hawai`i County Planning ,hti6t�}nciH Potiaa uta tn.are: QPP United States Department of the Interior }:��•,a� 22 •"_ 1.�W , .� FIST-[ AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 444RCH 3.=� Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office �k ' 300.ala \'ioana Boule l ard, Room 3-122 Honolulu. i-I w i-i 0h>iO in k,:pl Rclor Io • September 3, 2021 u!Hnii'lail-2u21- -(05it Tracie-Lee Camero, Planner Hawai'i County Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 • Hilo. Hawaii 96720 Subject: Technical Assistance for the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Development Environmental Assessment Hilo, Hawaii • Dear Tracie-Lee Camero: • • The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)received your request for comment on the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact(Draft EA) for the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project (Project) on August 10, 202L This project proposes to construct up to 90 affordable housing units on 9.09 acres at TIvIK(3) 2-4-001:165, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Thank you for your efforts to address listed species and recommended avoidance and minimization methods referenced in our December 23, 2020 letter. We provide the following comments for incorporation in your final Environmental Assessment and further consultation as necessary. This letter has been prepared under the authority of, and in accordance with, . provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 LLS.C. 1531 etseq.) as amended. The Draft EA did not address ae`o or Hawaiian stilts (Himcmlopus inexicarrus kniiclseiu). If project activities are likely to create permanent or temporary standing water, we recommend you incorporate the following measures into your project plans to avoid and minimize potential project impacts to Hawaiian stilts: • In areas where stilts are known to be present, post and implement reduced speed limits, and inform project personnel and contractors about the presence of endangered species on-site. • Have a biological monitor that is familiar with the species' biology conduct Hawaiian stilt nest surveys where appropriate habitat occurs within the vicinity of the proposed project site prior to project initiation. Repeat surveys again within 3 days of project initiation and after any subsequent delay of work of 3 or more days (during which the birds may attempt to nest). If a nest or active brood is found: INTERIOR REGION 9 INTERIOR REGION 12 COLUMBIA—PACIFIC NORTHWEST PACIFIC ISLANDS IDAHO. MONTANA`, OREGON`, WASHINGTON AMERICAN SAMOA. GUAM. HAWAII. NORTHERN -PArnAI MAIRIANA ISLANDS Tracie-Lee Camero '- o C'ontact the Service within 48 hours for further guidance. o Establish and maintain a I00-foot buffer around all active nests and/or broods until the chicks have fledged. Do not conduct potentially disruptive activities or habitat alteration within this buffer. .: Have a biological monitor that is familiar with the species' biology present on the project site during all construction or earth moving activities until the chicks fledge to ensure that Hawaiian stilts and nests are not adversely impacted. We agree with your conclusion that 'ope'ape`a or Hawaiian hoary bats (La.Virrrncs ci110'e01.s semoilrs) may use the site, and that the absence of bat detections during one survey does not confirm absence of bats (Page 16). Infra-red scanners or other meticulous search techniques may be approved by the Service for use by qualified personnel to clear one or two trees for immediate removal; however, there are no agency-approved methods to ensure absence of bats to clear larger numbers of trees or whole stands. To avoid and minimize impacts to the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project plans: • Do not disturb, remove, or trim woody plants greater than 15 feet tall during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15). • Do not use barbed wire for fencing. Thank you for conducting an extensive plant survey (Table 1 beginning on page 18).-The list you provided indicated that there are no endangered plants On site and no host plants for Blackburn's sphinx moth (Manch/ea blackhw'iii). We recommend project proponents take action to avoid attraction of Blackburn's sphinx moth to the project location and prohibit Nicolianaglcmca (tree tobacco) from entering the site. Tree tobacco can grow greater than 3 feet tall in approximately 6 weeks. I.f it grows over 3 feet, the plants may become a hostt-plant for Blackburn's sphinx moth. We therefore recommend that you incorporate the following measures into your project plan: • Remove any tree tobacco less than 3 feet tall. • Monitor the site every 4-to-6 weeks for new tree tobacco growth before, during, and after the proposed ground-disturbing activity. o Monitoring for tree tobacco can be completed by any staff, such as groundskeeper or regular maintenance crew, provided with picture placards of tree tobacco at different life stages. The 'io or Hawaiian hawk(Buie°soiiicn•ius), a species that was recently removed from the Federal list of threatened and endangered species, is known to occur in the area. While the Service no longer consults on the Hawaiian hawk, this species is still protected under'Hawai`i State regulations (H.R.S. §195D-4) and the.Migratory Bird Treaty Act(16 U.S.C. 703-712). Thank you for incorporating measures to avoid impacts to Hawaiian hawks (Page 19). Thank you for incorporating lighting shielded from view above for both construction and permanent lighting to minimize impacts to endangered seabirds including the `ua`u or Hawaiian petrel (Preroclroina scuidwicensis), the `akeake or Hawaii distinct population segment of the band-romped storm-petrel (Oceanocircunci casino), and the `a`o or Newell's shearwater (Pulliniis auricularis ircn elli, Page 19). Tracie-Lee Camero 3 Thank Von for your commitment to verify that no nene or Hawaiian Goose (Brarrrcr ( Nc.sochcrr) saw/Ike/is/A) are present prior to commencement of project activities (Page 19). To avoid and minimize potenmal project impacts to Hawaiian geese we recommend you incorporate the following measures into your project plans: • Do not approach, feed, or disturb Hawaiian geese. • If Hawaiian geese are observed loafing or foraging within the project area during the breeding season (September through April), have a biologist familiar with Hawaiian geese nesting behavior survey for nests in and around the project area prior to the resumption of any work. Repeat surveys after any subsequent delay of work of 3 or more days (during which the birds may attempt to nest). • Cease all work immediately and contact the Service for further guidance if a nest is discovered within a radius of 150 feet of proposed project, or a previously undiscovered nest is found within the 150-foot radius after work begins. o In areas where Hawaiian geese are known to be present, post and implement reduced speed limits, and inform project personnel and contractors about the presence of endangered species on-site. Additional measures for housing developments common to all listed animal species that will reduce mortality or predation include the following:• • Post and enforce low speed limits to reduce vehicle collisions with wildlife. • Require all pets, including cats and dogs, to be on leash at all times outside. • Require garbage cans with lids to reduce populations, of rats and mongoose, which are invasive species and prey upon native and endangered species. • Provide signage instructing residents and visitors to avoid approaching, feeding, or disturbing wildlife. The Service recommends incorporating all applicable avoidance and minimization measures into your project design to avoid and minimize effects on protected species. If you determine the proposed project may affect federally listed species, we recommend you contact our office early in the planning process so that we may assist-you with ESA compliance. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and for participating with us in the protection of our endangered species. If you have any questions, please contact Melissa Cady at melissa_cady cr,fws.gov or by telephone at 808-933-6963. When referring to this project, please include this reference number.: 01 EPIF00-2021-TA-0450. Sincerely. Acting island Team Manager Maui Nui and Hawaii Island Team . cc: Pacific Islands Field Office Administrative Team Ron Terry, Geometrician Associates geometrician ASSOCIATES , LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo,Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geomerricianassociates.com September 17, 2021 Cite!sic Javar-Salas Acting Island Team Manager Maui Nui.and Hawaii Island Team Pacific islands Fish and Wildlife Office 300 Ala .Moana Boulevard,Room 3-122 Honolulu, Hawai'i 96850 Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project,Island of Hawai`i,'FMK(3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Ms. Javar-Salas: Thank you for the letter of September 3,2021,you provided to the Hawai'i County Planning Department concerning the potential listed species present on the subject property. i am responding to this from the standpoint of the project proponent, the Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation WICDC), which is a non-profit dedicated to developing affordable housing that has assisted in the development of elderly, low- income and transitional housing throughout the Island of Hawai`i.'We thank you for noting the efforts of the project proponent to protect listed species through survey and institution of various avoidance and mitigation measures where listed species had even a small potential to be impacted. It is expected that the Planning Department will adopt these measures as conditions of their recommendation,With respect to some of your specific comments: .1. Ae'0 or Hawaiian stills (Hitnantopus tne; iCa1711s knuc/seni}. Our survey of the habitat indicates that there is essentially no potential for Hawaiian stilts utilizing the property. There is no standing water on the extremely well-drained and heavily forested 1881 lava flow in this area, and the geology of the property will preclude formation of standing water during construction. No standing water resulted during a previous project conducted by the project proponent directly makai, in an area with identical geology and slopes. No standing water features are p.lained as part of final project design.Nonetheless, the project proponent would be willing to require a contingency plan incorporating the conditions your letter proposes if and when actions by the contractor or the operator result in such standing water. 2.Infra-red scanners or other meticulous search techniques may be approved by the Service for use by qualified personnel to clear one or Iwo trees for immediate removal: however, there are no agency-approved methods to ensure absence of bats to clear larger numbers of trees or whole slam& We very much appreciate your evaluation of the efficacy of such techniques for clearing forested areas such as the subject property. In consideration of this, the project proponent agrees to simply prohibit disturbing, trimming or removing woody vegetation taller than 15 feet during the June 1 to September 15 bat pupping and rearing season. 3. Potential for tree tobacco and attraction(Ff.;l'ancJtrcu hlackhrtrni. The high rainfall of the area should preclude infestations of tree tobacco, but the project prciponent has been made aware of the need for this precaution,which it is planning to rigorously implement for a similar project in Kona. 4. Hon aitan hawk [hank you for acknowledging the project's measures to avoid impacts to the Hawaiian hawks, which remain listed by the State of Flawai'i. i. lighting restrictions for.ceabirdc. Thank you for acknowledging the project's measures to avoid impacts to listed Hawaiian seabirds. 6.Recommended measures for Nene or Hmvaiian Goose ('Brat?ta sandvicensis). As stated in the EA.although nine arc not expected on the site, pre-construction will include another verification that no none individuals or nests arc present that could be disturbed by construction activity. if present, the standard minimization measures that you provided will be instituted,and construction will not proceed until they have left the area. 7.Standard measures for housing developments that reduce mortality or predation: I. Post and enforce low speed limits to reduce vehicle collisions with wildlife. 2. Require garbage cans with lids to reduce populations glans and mongoose.. which are%/7Va,5il-e species and prey upon native and endangered species. 3. Provide signage instructing residents and visitors to avoid approaching,feeding, or disturbing wildlife. Measures 1-2 are generally part of standard operating procedures at all County housing developments. The project proponents will seek assistance on obtaining appropriate signage for this particular area. Again, we very much appreciate your review of the Draft EA.If you have any questions,please contact me at (808)969-7090. Sincerely, 7ROA, Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato. 11ICDC: Tracie-Lee Camero,Hawaii County Planning • Good afternoon Tracie-Lee: • My name is Pat Baji from Day-Lum Rentals & Management, Inc. and I am the Property Manager for Sunrise Ridge Owners Association. The Board of Directors has requested a copy of the proposed street and housing unit plan. Do you have that inforniation or can you direct me as to where I can obtain that information? I thank you for your time and efforts in this request. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 808-935-4152 or e-mail. Sincerely, • Pat Baji Pat Baji P: (M8)935-4152 ll�Y74,"":4-;- F: (80S)961-2459 2020 !•i Association Manager *: " PatB�a.davlum.com • LIUMw\w.davlum.com b,r )Rentals&Management Inc N f!t� • • geometrician • • ASSOCIATES , LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com hawaii.rr.com geometricianassociates.com September 17, 2021 • Pat Baji, Association Manager Da -Lu m Rentals and Management Y PatB{ daylum.com • Subject: Comments on Draft.Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola 0+N.lohouli Affordable .Housing Project, Island of Haw'ai`i, TILL{.(3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Ms. Baji: Thank you for your email to Tracie-Lee Camero of the Planning Department. In response to the request for the street and housing plan,please note that a concept plan is contained in the EA,which is available at by selecting the August 8,2021 edition of the Environmental Notice at: http:lfhealth.hawaii.gov/oegcl. The development concept at this time is to create pocket neighborhoods where clusters of units are arranged around central greens. Under this concept, the units would typically be single-family dwellings, duplexes, and up to four-plex structures not exceeding two stories in height. An illustration of this development type for this site is shown in Figure 4. However, as stated in the Draft EA, this concept is dependent on the necessaryfunding and P securing may be altered if appropriate funding is not secured. Thank you for you inquiry,and if have any questions,please contact me at(808) 969-7090. Sincerely, 4::)°51(‘ Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Assodates Cc: ' Keith Kato, HICDC: Tracie-Lee Camera, Hawaii County Planning From: Isaac Ojukwu <ojukwuisaac@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 10, 2021 8:43 AM To: Camero, Tracie•Lee<Tracie-Lee.Camero@hawaiicounty.gov> Subject: Hale Ola 0 Mohouli I just wanted know more about the low income project. geometrician ASSOCIATESLLC• integrating geographic science and planning I , phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry©hawaii.rr.com geomecricianassociates.com September 17, 2021 Isaac Ojukwu olllkwuisaac{C1!gmai1.com Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA), Bale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project, !slant! of Hnw ai`i,TMK(3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Mr. Ojukwu: Thank you for your email dated August 10,2021, in which you inquired about the project. A great deal of information is contained in the EA, which is available at by selecting the August 8,2021 edition of the Environmental Notice at: http://health.hawaii.gov/oegc/. in summary, the development is to provide affordable rentals for seniors and families.One method of achieving this is to create pocket neighborhoods where clusters of units are arranged around central greens. Under this concept, the units would typically be single-family dwellings,duplexes,and up to foie--plea structures not exceeding two stories in height. The project is expected to be ready for construction in .late 2022 and completed mid-2024. _ Please contact Keith Kato, Executive Director of the Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation, at kcith.hicdc n?gmail.com or 808-319-2422 if you have more specific questions. Sincerely_ Pert' Ron Teny, Principal - Geometrician Associates • Cc; Keith Kato, H.ICDC: Tracie-Lee Camcro,Hawaii County Planning From: K.M.F .•<kirbl@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2021 7:58 AM To: Camero, Tracie-Lee <Tracie-Lee.Camero@hawaiicounty.gov> Subject: Location for Affordable Housing Project Hello Tracy, I own some land up hear Volcano in Royal Hawaiian Estates. This is just me making a suggestion about a future site for another round of affordable housing for the citizens of Hawaii. Starting at the intersection of Makaala St. and Railroad Ave. There are a series of 10ac. lots owned by Hawaiian Home Lands. The area would be south of Yamada and Sons Quarry and just west of Panaewa brag Strip Road. It's close to Walmart, Target and Home Depot. It's also close to a transfer station and near the airport. For people on limited resources, this kind of convenience is crucial. The area is big enough for homes and future commercial development. Please consider this site at the next P&J meeting. Mahalo, Kirby F. • • geometrician • ASSOCIATES , LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaiisr.com geometricianassociates.com September 17, 2021 Kirby F. kirb I(iihounai I.com Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project, Island of Hawni`i,TMK(3) 2-4-0011:168 Dear Kirby: • Thank you for your comment email dated August 11, 2021,suggesting an additional affordable housing site at Maka`ala Street and Railroad Avenue in Hilo.I am responding to this from the standpoint of the project proponent,the Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (I-11CDC), which is a non-profit dedicated to developing affordable housing that has assisted in the development of elderly, low-income and transitional housing throughout the Island of Hawaii. As you noted, the land you suggested is under the control of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands. It is the prerogative of that Department to utilize the land for purposes that best suit their mission. This of course is focused on making land available for beneficiary housing. Thank you for your inquiry: lfyou have any questions about the EA for the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project,please contact me at (80S)969-7090 Sincerely, Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato, l-II.CDC: Tracie-Lee Cameo:), Hawaii County Planning Mori, Ashley Subject: FW: kukuau st From: milt car,rnH'kcris houilallJ_:om> Sent: Tuesday,August 10, 2021 12:51 PM To:Camera,Trade-Lee<Trari_-_-L,_e t. rner ;@;-ia vv. ic:o!,n+1. ; ;•✓> Subject: kukuau st DEAR TRACIE, IT SEEMS TO BE A GOOD CONCEPT PROJECT TO SOVE AFFORDABLE OR LESS COSTLY HOUSING AT MOHOULI ST.I HOWEVER, MY CONCERN IS ABOUT KUKUAU ST. AND HOW IT EHS AND THEN CONTINUES IN THE HILO HILLSIDE SUBDIVISION. WHY IS THAT? RUMOR HAS IT THAT IS WAS AN AGREEMENT WITH THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY FOR EVENTUAL CONNECTION OF BOTH KUKUAU ST_ AND THEREFORE ALLOWED THE PASSING OF THE PROJECT TO GO AHEAD. CONNECTION COST TO BE BORN BY DEVELOPER. IS THATTRUE? IF YOU CAN'T ANSWER PLEASE SEND ME A CONTACT PERSON WHO COULD ANSWER THERE TYPE OF QUESTIONS? THANK YOU, ONA OSHIJO 1 • geometrician ASS O C I A T E S , LLC • integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geometricianassociates.com September I 7, 202 Ona Oshijo milikona@hotmail.com. com. Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project, Island of Hawa.i`i,Ti U<(3)2-4-001;168 Dear Ms. Oshijo: Thank you for your comment email dated August 10, 2021. 1 am responding to this from the standpoint of the project proponent,the Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC). In answer to your specific comments: • 1. Concern forKukuan Street and plans for connection to Milo Hillside Subdivision. Agreement with developer that allowed the project to go through as long as connection to Hilo Hillside was made, with cost borne hr developer. We assume that by"developer"and "passing of the project"you are referring to the Hilo Hillside Subdivision, • and not the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project. There is certainly no connection between the extension of Krikuau Street and Hale Ola 0 Mohouli.We are unaware of any arrangements related to other developments.It is our understanding that the Planning Department will respond to you separately concerning your question. • Thank you for your inquiry_ If you have any questions about the LA for the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project,please contact me at (808) 969-7090. Sincerely, • Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato, HICDC: Tracie-Lee Camero,Hawaii County'Planning From: Dayna Wong-Otis <dayna.wongotis@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 6, 2021 8:30 AM To: tracie-lee.camero@hawaiicounty.gov; rterry@hawaii.rr.com Subject: Comments on EA for TMK (3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Mr. Terry, This letter is in response to the draft environmental assessment prepared for the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project. Below are a few comments. The impact of traffic to the area with the addition of this project. With our home being on the corner, we recently had an accident in which someone crashed into our rock wall causing rocks to fly into our property and damaging our property. We were very fortunate that we were not outside at the time of the accident, as the debris could have seriously hurt someone. We also already deal with a lot of speeding and traffic in our area which makes it dangerous for anyone who wishes to walk, bike or exercise. The added traffic worries us, especially as parents to a young child. Control measures for pests. Our area is known to have frequent visitors such as wild pigs and rodents. if the area is cleared, these pests will attempt to find a new home and could cross into our property. In the past, our neighbors have hired help to trap these animals. Thank you, Dustin and Dayna Otis 851 Kukuau St. Hilo, HI 96720 • geometrician ASSOCIATES , LEC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geomecricianassociates.com September 17, 2021 Dustin and Dayna Otis Dayna.wongotistdumail.com Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), "Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project, Island of Hawni`i.TNI.I (3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Otis: Thank you for your comment email dated September 6, 2021. I am responding to this from the standpoint of the project proponent. the Hawaii island Community Development Corporation (HICDC). In answer to your specific comments: . Traffic in the area, including speeding.pedestrian and traffic ralciy. The Draft EA discusses traffic issues in detail_ To summarize the major findings, the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development would generate 48 vehicles per hour(vph) during the AM peak hour with 10 vph inbound and 38 vph outbound. In the PM peak hour, it is expected to generate 68 vph, with 44 vph inbound and 24 vph outbound. This is a very small fraction of the traffic on Mohouli Street. The additional generated traffic is forecasted to have minor impacts on intersection operations in the vicinity. Assisting in reducing traffic impacts to minimal levels is a proposed driveway at the mauka end of the property, which will be restricted to right- in/right-out movements. This will help handle many inbound trips and also mauka-bound outbound trips,and will reduce the number of vehicles entering and existing at Kupuna'Place. As for traffic on your part of Kukilau Street, while it is likely that some mauka-bound traffic will cross Kukirau Street, effects to Kukftau Street residences are unlikely. The absence of a signal on Kiikiiau Street at Komohana Street, and the presence of a signal at Mohouli Street, makes it counterintuitive to utilize a roundabout route through Kukirau Street to access makai destinations in =filo.Therefore, no appreciable increase in traffic to Kuku,au Street between Mohouli Street and Komohana Street is expected. While it is acknowledged that pedestrians and bicyclists utilize the shoulder along the more than one-mile length of Mohouli Street for transportation and exercise, the project does not significantly increase traffic and creates just one additional right-in/right-out driveway that pedestrians and bicyclists must cross. 2. Control measures for pests. lithe cu-cc!is cleaned these pests will attempt to.find a new home and could cross into the Sunrise Estates sulxlit'ision. As stated in the Draft EA, l-IICDC recognizes neighbors' concern that feral pigs,chickens and rats displaced by the loss of habitat would relocate to his yard. However, it is more likely that the conversion from forest to urban uses where feral animals are more easily controlled would reduce the number of feral animals transiting front the property to neighboring residences. Keith Kato, Executive Director of IIICDC,has stated that.if transiting or relocated pests become an issue during construction,HICDC is willing to work with you to find a solution. \ 'e very much appreciate your rc\ictiw of'the Draft EA. If you have any questions.. please contact n1e at OM) 969-7090. Sincerely. • Ron Terry. Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato, HICDC: Tracie-Lee Camera. i-Iawai'i County Planning ifR;AFF-11117W13 ,gyp -\A j;tr • il , �,9 , �� .� ' a' '.� DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY COUNTY OF HAWAt`l , 345 KEKUUANAO'A STREET, SUITE 20 • HILO, HAWAI'l 96720 • oPnnw�i�• � . TELEPHONE (808)961-8050 • FAX (808)961-8657 September 3, 2021 TO: Mr. Zendo Kern, Director All ENTION: Ms.Tracie-Lee Camero, Planner Planning Department FROM: Keith K. Okamoto,Manager-Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Assessment for Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project South Hilo District,Island of Hawaii Tax Map Key 2-4-001:168 We have reviewed the subject Draft Environmental Assessment and have the following comments. Prior to issuing a water commitment for the proposed project,the Department will request estimated maximum daily water usage calculations, prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawai`i, for review and approval. After review of the calculations,the Department will determine a water commitment deposit amount, prevailing facilities charge(subject to change)to be paid, and any water system improvements required for final approval. Construction plans showing the proposed water system improvements must also be submitted for review and approval. Any meter(s)serving the proposed project will require the installation of a reduced principle type backflow prevention assembly within five feet of the meter on private property. The Department must inspect and approve the installation prior to commencement of water service. Should there be any questions,please contact Mr. Ryan Quitoriano of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070, extension 256. Sincerely yours, 4/bw\VV---) Keith K.Okamoto, P.E. Manager-Chief Engineer RQ:dinj y copy—Mr. Ron Terry, Geometrician Associates, LLC . , , Water Our most Precious 1source. Wai Vine The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider-and employer, geometrician ASSOCIATES , LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina-Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geometricianassociates.com September 17, 2021 • Keith Okamoto, Manager Hativai`i County Department of Water Supply 345 Kekuanaoa Street, Suite 20 Hilo HI 96720 Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola 0.Nlohou.li Affordable Housing Project,Island of Hawai`i,'RIK(3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Mr.Okamoto: Thank you for the comment letter elated September 3, 2021, The developer understands that prior to issuing a water commitment for the proposed project,DWS will request estimated maximum daily water usage calculations. After this.DWS will determine a water commitment deposit amount,prevailing facilities charge (subject to change) to be paid,and any water system improvements required for final approval.HICDC will be submitting construction plans showing the proposed water system improvements.The development will include the installation of a reduced principle-type backflow prevention assembly within five feet of the meter on the subject property. It is also understood that DWS must inspect and approve the installation prior to commencement of water service. We very much appreciate your review of the Draft EA. If you have any questions, please contact me at(808) 969-7090. Sincerely. ice, . • Ron Ten-y, Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato, HICDC: Tracie-Lei: Cantero, Hawaii County Planning Hale Ola 0 iVlohouli Affordable Housing Project Draft Environmental Assessment APPENDIX 2 Traffic Impact Assessment Report intentionally left 1)Jank1 } Transportation Impact Assessment Report Hale Ola Mohouli Affordable Residential Hilo, Hawai i November 2020 € 1,, 0 0, im. .aula`Cnarv'n!star',f ., � e • %occnut island ^, 4�" ��' �k *� j is � r I. C. ._ .1.. • as• q 4w1 . • • y, ; �; e ,:— ""...'''t" 1.*3 1 �t Stitt t1 y" !�1 .. Ak dk } �}'Yfl rt 41,4.-: it F ,1°rZk*rJill """'...:.."..; ,}N ✓ '"- t' lte } kF. 4 • 7j ;7«ik4iS M. , , V '';11k 3F t i1#" d .;k. , ' A {+a t''''....'' ''',. .1' E to it �, 1 yy • .wry ,i Mar `�.' Q+v.. {., f s t r 4 '� a r.• w. .e ` ��h1 A1G COM Technical Services,Inc. 1001 Bishop Street,Suite 1600 Ho . Hawaii Ph.(8013nolulu)52a, 521-503196813 Project Reference: 60644974 I Transportation Impact Assessment Report Hale Ola o Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Hilo, Hawaii November 2020 Prepared for: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation 100 Pauahi Street, Suite 204 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 (808) 987-6750 Prepared by: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 1001 Bishop Street, Suite 1600 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 (808) 521-5031 Project Reference: 60644974 1 I • Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report of Co o e o: , 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 2.1 Site Description 2 2.2 Roadway Conditions 3 2.2.1 Roadway Descriptions ... 3 2.2.2 Intersection Conditions 7 • 2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Conditions 9 2.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities 9 2.3.2 Bicycle Facilities 9 2.4 Public Transit Conditions 10 _2.5 Transportation Conditions 11 2.5.1 Volume Data Collection and Adjustment 11 2.5.2 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes 13 2.5.3 Existing Intersection Operations 13 3.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS 15 3.1 Proposed Development 15 3.2 Future Roadway Conditions 15 3.2.1 Roadways ....15 3.2.2 Intersections 15 3.3 Future Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Public Transit Conditions 15 3.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities 15 3.3.2 Bicycle Facilities 15 3.3.3 Public Transit 15 3.4 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Background Traffic 16 3.4.1 Ambient Traffic Growth 16 3.4.2 Future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center ....17 3.5 Vehicular Trips Generated by Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development 19 3.6 Projected Year 2025 Traffic Volumes 20 3.6.1 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Trip Distribution and Assignment 20 AECOM i - November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.6.2 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 20 3.8 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Operations 23 4.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 4.1 Summary 24 4.2 Evaluation of Traffic Signal Warrants at Kupuna Place 24 4.3 Recommendations 26 5.0 REFERENCES 27 List of Figures Figure 1 Project Site Location 1 Figure 2 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Conceptual Site Plan 2 Figure 3 Nlohouli Street Looking Makai Toward Komohana Street 3 Figure 4 Mohouli Street Looking Mauka Toward Kukuau Street 4 Figure 5 Komohana Street at Mohouli Street Looking North 5 Figure 6 Kukuau Street Approach to Mohouli Street Looking North 6 Figure 7 Kupuna Place 6 Figure 8 Nlohouli Street/Kupuna Place Intersection 7 Figure 9 fvlohouli Street/Komohana Street Intersection 8 Figure 10 Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street Intersection 9 Figure 11 Hele-On Bus Route for Intra-Hilo Kaumana Route 10 Figure 12 Adjusted Year 2020 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 12 Figure 13 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Volumes 18 Figure 14 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Generated Traffic Volumes 21 Figure 15 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Volumes 22 Figure 16 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Mohouli/Kupuna Intersection 25 Figure 17 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Mohouli/Kupuna Intersection 25 List of Tables Table 1 Adjusted Existing Weekday Peak Hour Intersection Operations 14 Table 2 Comparison of Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 16 Table 3 Projected Trip Generation by Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development 19 Table 4 Year 2020 and Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Operations Summary 23 AiCOM ii November 2020 I Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation is proposing to expand the existing Mohouli Senior Residences in Hilo. Hawaii. Hale Ola 0 Mohouli will add up to 90 affordable residential uses. The existing Mohouli Senior Residences has 184 residential units and at Adult Day Care Center. The proposed development site is located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. Figure 1 illustrates the project location. This transportation impact analysis report (TIAR) documents existing transportation conditions, projects future conditions in the vicinity of the proposed development with and without the proposed housing development and assesses the transportation impacts of the proposed action. It summarizes the transportation issues identified and proposes recommendations to address those issues. 'eWaia ku t: i\ ' + - �Cau+a'maiw�Island j toccnut island ,t. " H o CFiiic %. `' . __�' Reeds;s:<. : o _1A . *• _ 1.�t rr1 .,.�� i j. �.,' w . R • w ' . t '° i4' `,",yyVit' 1 'mays. '.',' 4 i yw M @Y � art'va �r �, ,,,,,.- ,.,-, :I.. . , � 4" • 644 A ..:0a,' y,. '•• iii.t' 1_, 1'r ,., _-7,•:.•-::','\;> ,/`. .i *, r. a a • .C• t. wd F ! t' - 3 ♦, ..7;..,,, •%'' ... ?.te'R:er2€t t7VA;;.Iax-'�^'i" ,* 6• Figure 1 Project Site Location AECOM 1 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report The proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli affordable residential development will be on parcel TMK (3) 2-4-001.168 located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. The currently vacant site is located between existing single-family residential development on Kukuau Street and the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center. Access to the site is proposed via a right-in/right-out driveway with direct access to Mohouli Street and via a driveway that would connect to existing Kupuna Place. Kupuna Place provides access to Mohouli Street for the existing Mohouli Senior Residences and will also provide access for the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center The Hale Ola 0 Mohouli driveway will connect to Kupuna Place via an easement that crosses the future County of Hawaii Fire Departmentt. Dispatch Center site. A conceptual site plan is shown in Figure 2. • • , F Future "' County of Hawaii f -,'. „rL• Proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Fire Department Existing Mohouli Dispatch Center Affordable Housing Expansion P Senior Residences • Proposed c Right-in/Right-out a{ Driveway ,_ -. l M1 Mohouli Street - Figure 2 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Conceptual Site Plan A=COM 2 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Key roadways in this study are Mohouli Street. Komohana Street. Kukuau Street. and Kupuna Place. Mohouli Street provides mauka to makai access between Kaumana Drive and Kilauea Street. The older portion of the roadway. makai of Komohana Street. runs through a residential neighborhood and has a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour (mph). The roadway was extended mauka from Komohana Street to the Kaumana Drive/Ainako Avenue intersection in 2002. The newer section of roadway has wide paved shoulders that could be used to widen Mohouli Street to four lanes and has a posted speed limit of 45 mph The lands adjoining this section of roadway are currently mostly vacant. The new section of roadway provides residents of Kaumana Drive and Ainako Avenue with an alternate access route to the south and west sections of Hilo. Figure 3 and Figure 4 illustrate the newer segment of Mohouli Street in the vicinity of the Kupuna Place access to the existing Mohouli Senior Residences. • Figure 3 Mohouli Street Looking Makai Toward Komohana Street AECOM 3 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 4 y Z Figure 4 Mohouli Street Looking Mauka Toward Kukuau Street Kornohana Street Komohana Street runs in a general north to south direction between Waianuenue Avenue and Ainaola Drive. The portion of roadway south of Puainako Street generally passes through residential areas while the northern section adjoins vacant lands. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. Komohana Street serves as a commuter route for residents in the south and west sections of Hilo to reach downtown Hilo, Hilo Hospital, and Hilo High School. Figure 5 illustrates Komohana Street at Mohouli Street looking north. AiCOM 4 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 1010r • t • _ y. -r, z w - ay MuAwi,. M�(I+ '' '�sA+"^"�'I�Ir'•:. � - "`•. of etT Tf Figure 5 Komohana Street at Mohouli Street Looking North Ku wdu St!,.'et Kukuau Street is a two-lane County minor collector road. The older roadway section, makai of Komohana Street, runs through a residential neighborhood and intersects with Kapi'olani Street. The newer roadway, mauka of Komohana Street, provides access to a mauka residential subdivision. The extension of Mohouli Street created a new intersection on this roadway. The posted speed limit on Kukuau Street is 35 mph in the vicinity of Mohouli Street. Figure 6 shows Kukuau Street at Mohouli Street looking north. AZ-CO/VI 5 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report • • r 4! ^ POP Figure 6 Kukuau Street Approach to Mohouli Street Looking North Kttpuni H.ice Kupuna Place provides access to Mohouli Street for the existing Mohouli Senior Residences Figure 7 shows Kupuna Place at its intersection with Mohouli Street. � II 144 4. 4. ' 10, 1111 Figure 7 Kupuna Place A:COrMI 6 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 11,1ohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Traffic data was collected at the Mohouli StreetVKupuna Place intersection and updated at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street and Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersections: Kupuna Place intersects Mohouli Street at an unsignalized 'T-intersection with STOP- sign control on the Kupuna Place leg of the intersection. The Kupuna Place approach is configured with a single lane. although there is sufficient width so that right-turning and left-turning vehicles can move concurrently. There is a refuge in the painted Mohouli Street median for vehicles turning left out of Kupuna Place onto Mohouli Street. The eastbound Mohouli Street approach is a single-lane approach with a median left- turn lane for traffic turning int Kupuna Place The westbound IV1ohouli Street approach is configured with a through lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. There are no crosswalks across the approaches to this intersection. Figure 8 is a photograph of the Kupuna Place approach to the intersection. 1 4 . a I Figure 8 Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place Intersection hlnhouii StreetjKo>nuhana Street The Mohouli Street/Komohana Street intersection is a four-legged, signalized intersection located east of the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection. Figure 9 shows the intersection configuration. A=COM 7 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report .a Vt.!µ 1 — t Gi ..,a �.✓ m i tI I ii Figure 9 Mohouli StreetlKomohana Street Intersection All intersection approaches are configured with a single through lane and exclusive left- turn lanes. The eastbound Mohouli Street and northbound Komohana Street approaches also have exclusive right-turn lanes. The westbound Mohouli Street and southbound Komohana Street approaches have shared through/right-turn lanes. The westbound, southbound, and northbound approaches have protected/permissive left-turn turn signal phasing, while the eastbound approach has protected left-turn signal phasing. There are crosswalks and pedestrian signals on all intersection approaches. Mohouli Street/Kukthitu Street The Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersection is a four-legged, unsignalized intersection with a STOP-sign control on the Kukuau Street intersection approaches. Figure 10 shows the intersection configuration. Both Mohouli Street approaches are configured with exclusive left-turn lanes and shared through/right-turn lanes. The Kukuau Street approaches are configured a shared left- through-right lanes, although there are wide. paved shoulders that would allow right- turning vehicles to bypass vehicles waiting to turn left or proceed straight through the intersection. There are crosswalks across all approaches of the intersection. A=COM 8 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report i . , r _° , '-V, .a I. ' irr:i �__-_+ 1 � 1l #7i 1i - l:' tea. .. 7e f 't —�, ��- __...»* .lT ~II I I'!ll)lii,lTiirt r, 1[ mac., __ .:._., fit- • 1 e �� l�.d!_ ".t-A "tom lei may.,/ ::;:/4 wti Lk", ' ..--',..1r,,-`4:a-,' '-,'Y 5" -: 1 _`1 • -- s� Figure 10 Mohouli Strzt C,\,,,,..-1,_, ,-..,,,i, [4.2.,d, a�;-. 2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Conditions 2.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities The intersections on Mohouli Street at Komohana Street and Kukuau Street have crosswalks across all approaches. The Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection does not have crosswalks. There are no sidewalks along Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. There are wide, paved shoulders and it was observed that they are used by pedestrians as sidewalks. There are sidewalks along the internal roadways within the Mohouli Senior Residences, including on Kupuna Place. 2.3.2 Bicycle Facilities There are no designated bicycle facilities along Mohouli Street, Komohana Street. or Kukuau Street in the vicinity of the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli site. However, as noted previously, the roadways in the area have wide, paved shoulders that are utilized by bicyclists as well as pedestrians. A=COM 9 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report The public transit service on the island of Hawaii is provided by the County's Hele-On Bus system. Figure 11 illustrates the closest existing transit service routes in the vicinity of the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli site. At this time. the site is not served by fixed transit routes. It was observed that the senior daycare located within the existing Mohouli Senior Residences provides shuttle bus service to some of its participants. INTRA-HILA KAUMANA ti (ltiimut island S l/ib Rd. • Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Site J Figure 11 Hele-On Bus Route for Intra-Hilo Kaumana Route A=COM 10 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report .5 a x`;po tat zr tee 2_3.1 Vo: t?ll Adju Cath( Due potentially atypical conditions due to COVID-19 related restrictions, alternative methods for establishing base condition traffic volumes were used. Base traffic turning movement volumes at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street and the Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersections were obtained from the Traffic Impact Analysis Report for Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood Project, September 2011. Vehicular turning movement, bicycle, and pedestrian counts were conducted at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection. These counts were conducted for the AM and PM peak periods on Tuesday, October 20, 2020 and Wednesday, October 21, 2020 from 6:00 AM to 8:30 AM for the AM peak period and 3:15 PM to 5:30 PM for the PM peak period. State of Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) link traffic volumes on Mohouli Street and on Komohana Street for years 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 were obtained and used to adjust the traffic turning movement counts to an estimate of what the base traffic volumes would be without the effects of COVID-19. These HDOT counts were also used to help estimate future ambient traffic growth rates. Figure 12 summarizes the adjusted Year 2020 peak:hour traffic turning movement volumes at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street, the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place, and the Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersections. The weekday AM peak hour was estimated to occur from 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM and the PM peak hour was determined to' occur from 3:15 PM to 4:15 PM. The traffic count summary sheets from the 2011 study, the recently counted Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection, and the HOOT counts are included in Appendix A. ASCOM 11 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report . , ....../;-• '., 6. •e..., -"0 Tn''' -,c - -t ' 'P • .k" .....- t I: C..,, ) '.%).• . . . ...•, , .56• ,, ,,,, ". • ,„- . :3 6'''• ! 1, ‘... . c." v,e ' .N -.9'''' Ox‘ - ':-• tu ,.. 5 - . 4 a ),{.0•"!,. ...1t,, ,r, o-. .. 1 k'A'°k•':c3..- T.F22.40 -5- !) pc' ,. w z 0 LE'E - • 2 ,i... o •••-•„9 . n . ' 4 I 0 > . . i („2 z,•11 EZ ci.-.•1:1 a, . < 1--• 2.Lr.Zi 0..0 cc , dsi = •••>,, 0 = 4. . . Ili t._"3'•.!&(?).7'.1,•'''. a_ 4, Zmi.S' E ,-- .... o • a. ,. ,tili 1.`• & 0 = 1, 0 1 2 - C`.1 > s&'. 6'' ..4.- '' rt er4/11.31 ,' ri 4..X 6 ci. v.) .. .. ›- -5 .:... LL1 0 -.. S-.. n 0 LII. -4) 1 < x , '•-•\ , Figure 12 Adjusted Year 2020 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes • ) AECOM 12 November.2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2.5.2 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes • Low pedestrian and bicycle volumes were observed. Both the pedestrian and bicyclists were observed using the paved shoulders on Mohouli.Street. During the AM peak hour 1 bicycle and 7 pedestrians were observed. Most of the pedestrians observed appeared to be walking for exercise or were walking a pet. During the PM peak hour 1 bicycle and 0 pedestrians were observed. A greater number of pedestrians were observed later with the largest number, 13, occurring from 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM. As in the AM peak hour, most of the pedestrians observed appeared to be walking for exercise or were walking a pet. The pedestrian and bicycle counts are included in Appendix A with the traffic count summary sheets. There are separate worksheets for the pedestrian and bicycle counts. 2.5,3 Existing Intersection Operations The three intersections were analyzed using the adjusted Year 2020 peak hour turning movement volumes and existing intersection configurations. Table 1 summarizes the calculated intersection delay and level of service (LOS) for the weekday AM and PM commuter peak hour time periods. The intersections were analyzed using the unsignalized,intersection capacity methods described in the Highway Capacity Manual, Sixth Edition (HCM) through the Synchro/SimTraffic software. The Synchro analysis worksheets are included in Appendix B. As shown in Table 1, the key turning movements at each intersection operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS) for peak hour conditions. The left-turn movement from Kupuna Place to eastbound Mohouli Street reflects analyses conducted assuming a vehicle having to execute the turn in one maneuver. As noted previously, there is a median left-turn refuge area that allows vehicles to complete the left-turn maneuver in a two-step process, making the left-turn movement much easier. Assuming that vehicles must complete the left-turn in one maneuver results in a conservatively high delay. LOS for unsignalized intersections is a qualitative index based on a quantitative performance measure such as intersection delay to express the relative level of traffic operations. Definitions of LOS are included in Appendix C. AZ-",COM 13 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour IntersectioniMovemem Delay LOS Delay LOS MohouliiKukuau ES Mohouli LT 7.9 A 8.3 A VVB Mohouli LT 8.5 A 8.0 A NB Kukuau Combined , 20.4 C 14.8 SB kuktie,U Combined 12.3 B 15.3 Mohouli/Kupuna ES Nionc .iii LI 7.9 A 8.7 A SB Kupuna LT 18.1 C 18.7 C SB Kupuna RT 0.8 A 11.0 MohoulifKomohana 33.6 C 36.6 Notes: Delay is seconds/vehicle Analyses performed using Synchro Version 11 and summarized consistent with HCM,8th Edition,parameters AOM 14 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report The proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli development proposes up to 90 affordable residential units on parcel TMK (3) 2-4-001:168 located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. A conceptual site plan is shown in Figure 2 of this report. Access to the site is proposed via a right-in/right-out driveway with direct access to Mohouli Street and via a driveway that would connect to existing Kupuna Place. Kupuna Place provides access to Mohouli Street for the existing Mohouli Senior Residences and will also provide access for the future-County of Hawai'i Fire Department Dispatch Center. The Hale Ola 0 Mohouli driveway will connect to Kupuna Place via an easement that crosses the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center site. Assumed project time frame is five years in the future, 3.2 Future Roadway Conditions :3.2.1 Roadways No changes to Mohouli Street, Komohana Street, Kupuna Place, or Kukuau Street are anticipated within the time frame of this study. Mohouli Street, in the vicinity of the proposed project, has wide paved shoulders that would enable widening in the future if , justified by background traffic growth. 3.2.2 Intersections No changes to the existing intersections of Mohouli Street/Komohana Street, Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place, or Mohouli StreetfKukuau Street are anticipated within the time frame of this study. 3,3 Future Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Public Transit Conditions 3.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities No changes to the existing pedestrian facilities at the locations evaluated in this study are assumed. 3.3,2 Bicycle Facilities As noted previously, bicyclists traveling along Mohouli Street either share the road with vehicular traffic or use the wide paved shoulders. No changes are assumed for within the time frame of this study. 3.3.3 Public Transit Hele-On bus routes documented in the existing conditions section of this report are assumed to remain the same within the time frame of this evaluation. AECOM 15 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Peak Hi.Pur Background traffic refers to traffic unrelated to the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli affordable housing development. Background traffic was projected for Year 2025 • conditions based on an assumed five-year time frame for the proposed development. There are two main components to the background traffic volumes: • growth in traffic on Mohouli Street, Komohana Street, and Kukuau Street; • traffic generated by the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center. 3.4.1 Ambient Traffic Growth Table 2 compares peak hour traffic volumes counted from 2007 to 2020 at the intersections evaluated in this study. As shown, traffic volumes have remained relatively consistent over the past 10 plus years on Mohouli Street and Komohana Street. With the exception of the.2020,counts, the traffic volume data are pre-COVID-19. Table 2 Comparison of Peak Hour Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Roadway Segment Eastbound Westbound Total Eastbound Westbound Total Mohoull:Kukuau Kupuna 498 290 788 272 545 817 (2007 count) Mohouli:Kukuau Kupuna • 558 325 893 322 485 307 (2009 count) Mohouli:Kukuau-Kupuna 495 242 737 315 457 772 (2020 count) 1-- Mohouli:Kupuna- Komohana 470 245 715 290 527 817 (2007 count) Mohouli:Kupuna- • Komohana 535 255 790 300 485 785 (2009 count) Mohouli:Kupuna- Komohana 516 261 777 345 482 327 (2020 count) Northbound Southbound Total Northbound Southbound Total Komohana:South of • Mohouli 1,215 430 1,645 605 890 1.495 (2007 count) Komohana:South of Mohouli 1,135 455 1,590 615 930 1,545 (2009 count) Komohana:"South of Mohouli 1,102 435 1,537 618 867 1,485 (2019 HOOT) Note:AM Peak Hour:7:00 AM-8:00 AM.PM Peak Hour:4:00-5:00 PM(varies slightly) Counts 2007,2009,and 2019 are prior to COV1D-19 conditions Based on the historic traffic data, it is judged that current background traffic growth will. be based,on new projects occurring in the vicinity of the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli AECOM 16 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report affordable residential project. Many large projects were previously expected to occur by 2020 but have not. If they do proceed, an update of their entitlements will likely be needed. Therefore, growth in the year 2025 peak hour forecast of traffic at the intersections evaluated in this study is based on likely projects that will occur in the immediate vicinity of the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli project. A project that meets that criterion is the future County of Hawaii Fire Department • Dispatch Center located on the parcel adjacent to the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli project. Traffic from the Fire Dispatch project will be added to the adjusted existing year 2020 traffic to forecast the year 2025 background traffic. 3.4.2 Future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center Forecast of traffic generated by the County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center was obtained from a previous study entitled Traffic Impact Analysis Report, County of Hawaii Fire Administration Support Complex, February 2008. This is considered a conservatively high estimate of traffic generated as the land use assumed in the report contained more than just a dispatch center. Figure 13 illustrates the projected Year 2025 peak hour turning movement volumes for the background traffic. ACOS 17 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report . . o . o to . <I 1 • b, kl, ., . ,;• ,,..-.43 • it/ ...\%"3 ,,,, , , •e.,, ip 12""..e `., .‘ £ * t4, - 'eee \* ,-e•,' -t , , 4-' e .,., .*.,• • it\i ' '' e,-- • ..-,,s,... . . . ..‘"t. . . . ,,,,,,;• . ..-.* • . ,_ '''' , 4..o " .f1-• . 0 ,-•• '„ u..1 -s• ,3-... s.--et) s.--• --,V., a r4 D do _1 do ' ..‘.6... ''''''..k ' - 1 Q.6 •N•o-7A r...--T., 4). . 4. , 0 Z. O. 0 f -• • 1 'i c ' u-u • 8 1 . z -. 4 I 0 . W . 0 4.7. . 1:3-g''PI c 0 20,2 , . co 2 z- 0 -› I 6 * ' • 4, . <I w z< , ;,..•‘-? : a . .@.. .4.-... o.. . to 4..\•q , 2 2 (s.,4,,....,...,- .....1, , ... 001) 0 '''r ' 1 2‘41 • tn . - 73 ,. ,• 1E ',S,li:P 40 •••• '• 0 -•, o.1 c•C ).-:-- ) .. ,. Js n„ ,• es LIJ -' >•- = .4 e,-. •• , 0 ° a. •,, LLI 2. E L, o- .'• .4.z 0 . . • Figure 13 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Volumes ACOM 18 November 2020 • , Hate Ola 0 Mahout' Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report D1 pew'.. v- °t Table 3 summarizes the land use and estimated vehicular volumes that would be generated by the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development. The vehicular volume is based on the trip generation rates documented in the Institute of Transportation (ITE) publication, Trip Generation. 10' Edition. Equations for AM and PM peak hours of adjacent street traffic was used in this calculation. The trip generation equations for Category 210 (Apartment) was used to estimate the vehicular traffic generated by the site. The index used as a predictor was the maximum number of dwelling units proposed. Table 3 Projected Trip Generation by Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development ITE AM Peak Hour PM Peak.Hour I Land Use Intensity Category g y In Out In Out Multi family 90 D.U. 210 10 38 44 24 Residential Notes:AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes are in vehicles per hour.Trip Generation is the estimation of vehicular traffic based on equations documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' publication,Trip Generation, 10th Edition. For Category 220-Apartment,the trip generation equations are: AM:T=0,49 (X)+3.73 (20% Entering/80% Exiting) PM:T=0.55(X)a-17.65 (65%Entering/35%Exiting) where T-traffic volumes (vehicles per hour), X= dwelling units O.U. dwelling units CO 18 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report • 3.i' F ro : Y eto 20 1114.:e... .ta,l [Jule ( H 0 Moliouli Trip Distribution nod �Vi iltili_'lii The projected-Year 2025 vehicular volumes generated by the kale Ole 0 Mohouli project summarized in Table 3 were directionally distributed and assigned to the roadway network. The directional distribution of turns onto and from Mohouli Street was based on the traffic turning movement conducted October 20-21, 2020. Turning movements at the Mohouli StreetlKomohana Street and Mohouli StreetlKukuau Street intersections utilized the turning movement patterns in the adjusted existing turning movements. The resulting projected Year 2025 traffic volumes generated by the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohoull development are summarized in Figure 14. 3.6.2 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The projected traffic volumes generated by the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development summarized in figure x were combined with the projected Year 2025 background traffic summarized in Figure y to obtain the total Year 2025 peak hour traffic volumes. The total projected Year 2025 peak hour traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 15. • AECOM20 ,November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report ......./, , . I. q . 1 4, - e ,.._,<,1' .• ,, • c:,,,,, / ,. ,• ,-,-., ., 2-: 2 0 ' o •,, ti. I— ,0 ... S.- / .c`i v ILI 4.," ,;,t. '''Ll ,--"—C2,3 k• ..., dc" •k-''' t 7.1J, a, LLJ • o, c 1 4?" Q.110--;i t o 1 0 :-- x t7.s.,I I g S.,2 Ti ti 0 Fi 0 I 0 < I < 0 U.1 < ,`z-, CL 0 04 • ) d' °kind 0 I .> (J? t *, 1 e cv "4- --, yr <C ._ LU z< 0- 2 a. CI 4'1/ Ats . < = 8 , 7.Ss nerbin3? .'2) .7k Lt) CI , *.E D4 1— ,4 ,..? g 0 0 a. UJ r.: o ri o I— 0 . 0 cz a' 03. z Zu i i•-•t 1 ....." i , ••'.. •-• LIJ — —) 0 '''''. ^.• •k- 0 si., To- o. = •-' I Figure 14 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Hale Ola 0(Vlohoull Generated Traffic Volumes A-I:COM 21 November2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 5. 4 0 �,` `41.3\ ._• { a . � X05 X10° 641. 1� i eI. I AN. CC �BieNs`, :• .lc r fI ' 10Z i .y 16'1' J1 tr!i ' II i O� r ) J O 7j "'5 4'i�n Or' u h CN C Qom,a. .,w • o\ Wow 14, .m��` z rt KnPunap1' ,� �) y I`4,0}74 Va,_ m s C..,,,,, 2 X I 4� 1 0 4 . i '' ` "' I > c 3 2 w I 0 LLV . UI 1LL a I a x J ly,� � SL -2 oy") ,ra-8 }< 2- 0$y o 0 O a ` Co' I— - �r h LUc• Z P a. ,,,...-,.,•••.-4.? 0- Z /C") 0e, z/ a a ^s./esy ��6s)1J Q N `O`f.�� Q. N Q c ill 75 ao e c fl 0 a , W g n O e _ 9 -, O W ^ I ° O c J i a. T Figure 15 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Volumes A cOM .22 November 2020 • Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3,8 c _ Iz�_.._c, :. ._ , 2025 _ _. ,{ Er) ._1 Ft . .,ir_t c ... The projected Year 2025 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes with and without the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development were used to evaluate future intersection operations. The signalized and unsignalized HCM 61' Edition methods as implemented by the Synchro analysis software was used. Table 4 summarizes the results of the existing 2020, year 2025 without project, and year 2025 with project intersection analyses for AM and PM peak hour conditions. • Table 4 Year 2020 and Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Operations Summary • AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2025 w/o 2025 2025 w/o 2025 Intersection/Movement Existing Project w/Project Existing Project w/Pro•ect Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay I LOS Mohouli/Kukuau EB Mohouli LT 7.9 A 7.9 A 7.9 A 8.3 A 8.3 A 8.3 A VVB Mohouli LT 8.5 A 8.5 A 8.5 A 8.0 A 8.1 A 8.1 A NB Kukuau Combined 20.4 C 20.6 C 20.9 C 14.8 B 14.9 B 15.0 C SB Kukuau Combined 12.3 B 12.4 B 12.5 B 15.3 C 15.4 C 15.5 C Hale Ola 0 Mohouli RI/RO SB RI/R0 RT na I na ( na na 9.9 A na na na na 11.4 B Mohouli/Kupuna EB Mohouli LT 7.9 A 8.1 A 81 A 8.7 A 8.7 A 8.8 A SB Kupuna LT 18.1 C 18.7 C 21.1 C 18.7 C 22.1 C 26.6 , D SB Kupuna RT 9.8 , A 9.8 A 9.9 A 11.0 B 11.7 B 12.1 B Mohouli/Komohana 33.6 C 33.7 C 38.6 D .36.6 D 36.8 D 38.6 D Notes: Delay is in seconds/vehicle Analyses performed using Synchro Version 11 and summarized consistent with HCM 6th Edition parameters na=not applicable As shown, the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli affordable residential development has relatively small traffic impacts at the intersections evaluated. The added traffic does contribute to a slight increase in overall intersection delay at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street intersection, and because the overall.intersection delay due to current and projected background traffic volumes at this intersection are near the threshold for LOS C, the slight increase in delay moves this intersection to LOS D, usually considered acceptable to urban peak hour conditions, AE OM 23 November 2020 Hale Ole 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report .... .t .h''.:!-'1Y A :0 A 1.-,1 The proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development is a proposed affordable residential development that expands the existing Mohouli Senior Residences in Hilo. It will contain up to 90 multi-family residential units and is located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. The proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development is projected to generate 48 vehicles per hour (vph) during the AM peak hour with 10 vph inbound and 38 vph outbound. In the PM peak hour, it is expected to generate 68 vph with 44 vph inbound and 24 vph outbound. The additional traffic generated by the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development is forecasted to have minor impacts on intersection operations at the intersections in the vicinity of the proposed development. A proposed driveway with traffic movements restricted to right-in/right-out movements will be effective in reducing traffic activity on Kupuna Place. The existing roadway infrastructure would be able to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development. 4,2 Evaluation of Traffic Signal 'Warrants at Kupuna Place The projected Year 2025 peak hour turning movements were used to evaluate the need for a traffic signal at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection_ Currently, this intersection operates as.a two-way STOP-sign controlled intersection with the STOP- sign on the Kupuna Place approach. Figure 16 and Figure 17 show graphic evaluations of the peak hour traffic signal warrant • as documented in the Manual on Uniform Control Devices (MUTCD), 2009 as revised, for the projected year 2025 AM peak hour and the 2025 PM peak hour time periods.. As shown, in Figure 17, the projected year 2025 PM peak hour volumes are closer to warranting a traffic signal at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection than the projected year 2025 AM peak hour volume. Even for the projected year 2025 PM peak hour, the peak hour traffic signal warrant in not satisfied. The projected year 2025 PM peak hour traffic on Mohouli Street is 910 vehicles per hour. To satisfy the peak hour traffic warrant, this volume would need to increase to approximately 1,000 vehicles per hour, a 10 percent increase. Given the fairly stable traffic volume level on Mohouli Street between year 2007 and year 2020, it is anticipated that this 10 percent increase would require growth over a substantial number of years or would be caused by a dramatic increase in development in the vicinity of the intersection. AECOM 24 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Year 2025 AM Peak Hour Figure 4C-4, Warrant 3,Peak Hour(70% Factor) icommiiiiii?LESS7H4ri P.i..3trit PERULATION OF ili.10!•;'E 40'$O Oti VAIOR STREET. . . ' . Mit,CPA S'I'REET ,,,r • - — •- • ' —,X HOCA-EP- _7- - i VOLUME .4' APPROACH- ro I VPH 7 1 _ i i 7-71 _._„ 3(70 700 7077 tES.X.? 777) ,50A (...,,x, loija 1100 1000 13w 907)1'STREET—TOTAL.OF BOTH APPROACHES---- VEHICLES PER HOUR(VPH) 'Note• 100.ph appaAs a's rpv rdwei 1"C077861 000171 tat is,saup„sheat appaaAsh',111 1.80 at r-,ca-a SaVs and 75 oph Apiaahs as IN.,.trataN (Wes-hold aslurna,(10 77 travassacai apordacc Yin ona:ataa . Figure 16 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Mohouli/Kupuna Intersection Year 2025 PM Peak Hour Figure 4C-4, Warrant 3, Peak Hour(70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) i r Thr— I . 1 1 1 I 1 400 ---------4. --4-----,"2 OR MORE LANES a 2 OR MORE LANES ---i I !,,,... i 1 I I i ! MINORI I 2 OR MORE LANES& I LANE STREET 3no - ------i---- --i------- I 4 —,- —1 HIGHER- i I i 1 LANE& 1 LANE I i • VOLUME I APPROACH- 200 -i- ---i- --r-- 4 ._., VPH 1 i i 1 41111111 I — 100 1.- .-t, I - 100* 1 I i 1 1 i 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300., MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR(VPH) . "Note:100 vph apphes as the lower threshold volume or a minor-street approach with Iwo or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume Mr a minor-street approach with one lane. Figure 17 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Mohouli/Kupuna Intersection ASCOM. 25 Nbvember.2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development , Transportation Impact Assessment Report fReco3z 1-1 The following improvements are recommended for the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development: • Implement the proposed right-in/right-out driveway on Mohouli Street. As part of the implementation, restripe part of the wide paved shoulder on westbound Mohouli Street as a right-turn only lane into the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development; • Assure that future major development occurring in the area with traffic impacts to the segment of Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street provide an evaluation of traffic signal warrant for the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection. i AECOM 26 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development • Transportation Impact Assessment Report Hawaii Island Hele-On Bus - Hele-On - A Service of the County of Hawaii Mass Transit Agency. (2020). Retrieved from http://www.heleonbus.org/ Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2012. "210 Single Family Detached Housing." In Trip Generation Manual 1U'" Edition, Volume 2: Data 297-298. Washington DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers. Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2012. "230 Residential Condominium/Townhouse." In Trip Generation Manual 9t'' Edition, Volume 2: Data 395-396. Washington DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers. Transportation Research Board of the National Academics. 2010. "Urban Street Facilities." in Highway Capacity Manual 2010, 3:16-1-16-47. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. 2009. "4C. Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies." In Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 4C.03 439-441. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration. AECOM27 November 2020 Traffic Count Data Raw Vehicle Turning Movement Traffic Count Worksheets File Name C.,Userviefferson younvDocuments\Kupuna_MohouliXupuna_Mohouli AM Peak.pp Start Date 10121/2020 Start Time: 6:00:00 AM Site Code:00000000 Comment 1 Default Comments Comment 2 Change These In The Preferences Window Comment 3.Select FileiPreference,n the Man Scree 4;Then Click the Comi-ii,_,:t.: I KUPUNA Pt. 1 MOHOUU ST / KUPUNA PL MOHOUU ST From Ea at F'IIATI SOUCL i'..tili i,ies! 1 Start Time 1 Right I Thru I Left I Peds Right I Thfu I Left i Peds 1 Right I Thru 1 Left 1 Peds Right 1 Thru I Left I Peds 06 00 AM 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 06 15 AM 2 C 3 0 3 21 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 59 0 06 30 Am e 3 0 3 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .92 1 0 06 45 AM 0 0 2 0 6 32 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 120 0 0 07 00 AM 0 0 6 0 3 49 0 0 7 0 G 0 0 ;19 1 0 07 15 Ahl 1 0 9 0 10 39 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 133 3 0 07 30 Am 2 0 5 0 3 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 2 0 07 45 AM 7 0 7 0 9 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 C8 00 Ak! 1 0 5 0 9 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 2 0 C8 15 AM 1 0 5 0 5 53 0 0 0 0 ti 0 0 d3 0 AM Peak How 6 0 27 0 25 236 ' 0 n C 0 C 0 0 469 6 0 7 00.800 AM Vehicle Count File Name C,Usersiefferson.young\Documents\Kupuna_MohoulfiKupuna_Mohouh AM Peak ppd Start Date 10/21'2020 Start Time: 6.00:00 AM Site Code:00000000 Comment 1 Default Comments Comment 2 Change These in The Preferences Window Comment 3.Select File:Preference in the Main Scree mrnant 4 Then Click the CClilinentS Tab I KUPUNA Pt. MOHOUU ST I KUPUNA PL MOHOULI ST (slih From Eat Fi Lirei Souiti ri!chi Weiu I Stataime I Right i Pint I Left I Pods Right I Thru I Left I Peds I Right I This I Left I Peds Right 1 Thru 1 Left I Peds 06 00 AM lS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 06 15AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o to C LI o c 0 0630 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 C c C - , ' 0 o 0 08 45 AM o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C c , L o 0 I 0 0 07 00AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 07 15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Cr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 CC 0 o 0 0 oi 45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0800 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 . C. 1 0 0 08 15 AM 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C c . i i.! 1 0 0 APA Peak How 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ., 1 0 0 700.8 00M Bicycle Count • , File Name: C:iUsers\lefferson.young\Documentsikupuna_MohoulkKupuna_Nlohouli AM Peak.ppd Start Date: 10121/2020 Start Time: 60000 AM Site Code:00000000 Comment 1.Default Comments Comment 2:Change These in The Preferences Window Comment 3.Select File;Preference in the Main Scree 4 Then ack the Co0Tirenta Tat, 1---- KUPUNA Pt. 1 MOHOUL1 ST 1 KUPUNA Pt MOHOUL1 ST 31. 11',nth F(orri E.a.it FWEII SCX4i Fiona Wei I Start Time 1 Right I Thru { Left I Peds R5ht I Thru I Left I Peds Rigid I Thru I Left I Peds Right f 'Thru I Left I Peds I 06 00 AM 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 3, '.30 0 1 0 0 06-15 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 C, 0 0 2 0 0 06,30 AM 0 0 3 . 1 0 0 0 0 L, 3 0 3 0 0 06•45 AM 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 3 1 0 Or 00 AM 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 :3 3 0 0 0 0 Cl 07.15AM C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ni', 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0745 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n I. 0 0 0 1 0 0800 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 33 C 0 3 0 0E115 AM 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 •. 0 0 0 0 o AM Peak Hout 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ,T, 0 0 0 3 0 1 7.00.600AM Pedestrian Count • File Name:C:',Usersi..riefferson.young‘Documents\Kupuna_MonoulkKupuna_Mohouli PM Peak.ppd Start Date 10/20/2020 Start Time: 3:15:00 PM Site Code:00000000 Comment 1.Default Comments Comment 2:Change These in The Preferences Window Comment a Select FiletPreference in the Main Scree aemtner:t 4:Then CU the Cci. -,.. : KUPUNA PL 1 MOHOUU ST i KUPUNA PI I MOHOUU ST Front Noith From East I Stan Tome ;Right 1 Thfu ( Left I Pei:is 1 fi:,,lni I Thru 1 Left I Pods i Right I Thru I Left I Peds I Ff;ght I. Thre I Left I Peds I 03 15 PM 3 0 117 0 0 0 0 13 0 34 0 0 03.30 PM 3 0 ,. . _ .4 112 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 75 3 0 03 4.5 PM 3 0 , 3 9 100 0 0 0 C. ..0 ' . ,. 0 88 1 0 04.00 PM 1 0 ,:. 0 7 91 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 98 3 0 04 15 PM 0 0 5 0 8 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 0 04 30 PM I 0 03 ii 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cr 69 0 0 04 45 PM 1 0 7 Cl Cl 134 0 0 .. 0 0 0 67 0 0 05 00 PM t 0 6 0 3 98 0 0 c, 0 0 0 83 0 0 05 15 PM t10 3 10 3 '03 00 0 ,_ 0 0 .0 72 0 0 3 Cl 33 0 25 4M3 0 0 0 0' 0 C 0 0 312 3 0 Vehicle Count • • • • File Name- C-,Usersijefferson.youngDocuments\Kupuna_MohoulkKupuna_Mohouti PM Peak.ppd Start Date 10120/2020 Start Time: 3:1500 PM Site Code:00000000 Comment 1 Default Comments Comment 2 Change These in The Preferences Window Comment. Select FileiPreference in the Main Scree -: Thor.Cc the CCif,fTleflili Tab KUPUNA PL I MOHOULI ST KUPUNA Pt MOHOULI ST E ,T Nuith ,:.;r:,'-‘t.ai Fiur SouM Fical West Start Tme I ROI I Thru I Left I Pads I Rght I Thru I Left I Peds Right J Thru I Left I Peds Right I Thru I Left I Peds 03 15 PM 0 C 0 C0 r., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0330PM 0 e 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 45 PM 0 0 0 r.! 0 i) 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 O400PM it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 15 PM C 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 04 30 PM 00 0 0 5 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 45 PM 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 85 15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 Bicycle Count File Name:C:•Users'gefferson.young'\Documents\Kupuna Mohouli;Kupuna Mohouli PM Peak.ppd Start Date 10120/2020 Start Time: 3:1500 PM Site Code:00000000 Comment 1 Default Comments Comment 2 Change These in The Preferences Window Comment 3 Select FFilerPreference in the Main Scree -7-,::,-,Chick the Con r,mcnt5 Tab KUPUNA PL 1----- MOHOULI ST KUPUNA Pt. MOHODU ST From,Noith From Last Fiorn South FIGM.1-esi I Start Thme Rght 1 Thru I Left I Peds I Right I Thru I Left I Peds Right I Thru I Left I Peds Right I Thru I Left j Peds 03 15 PPR 0 0 0 0 0 ±' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03.30 PM 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03.45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 3 0 04.00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0415 PM 0 0 00 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0430 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 _ 04:45 PM 2 _ 0 0 3 2 0 C 0 0 U 0 0 0 2 _ 0500 PM 0 0 0 3 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 05.15 PPA 0 .. 2 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 _ 0 .. U 0 0 0 4 Pedestrian Count Traffic Count Data from TIAR for Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood Project - September 2011 r- KUKUAU ST KUKUAU ST to ninuka to nouka t 5 11) 00 5 to 0 LC) N *- 500 , IN <•-• — 295 MOHOULI ST " 1 L-+ 1 45 MOHOULI ST L. V 20 10 I I MOHOULI ST 50 r-4 230 to Kthuttana 435 o In 8N 1.0 85 1 0 o 0 t 5 0 0 L 20 0 LC) I 5 t 60 0 0 o LO N 1.0 LI) C) IN L- 170 310 ‘-- 490 580 145 " -. 1 25 " 1 130 " L. 1- 20 120 1 T r 10 i -1 I r KOMOHANA ST 160 I " 35 1 " I r-> 610 to 0 0 7600 0 to PowOlawni 280 -. 000 350 o to co-, co o N tr) N 405 15 1 ' 175 10C10 1 MOHOULI ST KUKUAU ST MOHOULI ST KUKUAU ST to tookni to otakai to makai to waktli AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING 2009 TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 2 State of Hawaii Department of Transportation Traffic Count Station Data / , . I , 10'2,31202G 15 Mtn07.e Report RDt :, State of Haveaii.Department of Transportation.Highways Division un ae;r, . ';4 1S Minute Voltima Report $INID:TO 01151011 To,-Io:,i4A01. LIR 1:•,W, DIR 2: `',"" Finol AADI:11777 I . Funefund CIAss:IiPEIAN.9C'..,'1 fl'9'1,,. Count Type:E,ASII Counter Typo:TA, Route No:I«,•:, , Location: DATE:144:110•10 , I AM COMMUTER PERIOD 405:00-001001 010 1 r DIA 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD 115:00.ISA DI RIR! DfR 2 TOTAL P44.;',..,q,--..,,D^;.4,2211 . (00770775100 0012 AT! 725K-.51',.1: .1,'9 91'r,0120((-AM ,,,, ,l'AC,,,:,N,,, Am.271.0.77 377.,41/ 04 '217 101 12(4 731 TA 17.,1 .:':.•: AM 012720700. 310 PM 7 73-03.71517- 040 . NVI 1:, 1 E,,-.!. '0T°510'':.„%, ,:C,..%" 17125.I 11:7031%IA., 070 ''..',4. .170 • AM ;IA<03 7A31. 37,5 AM 77.22 35AM 2-1710.130.,7357-77,2, ,-,.,-riAK K,-,,,,,wz 4.7,2;!A 7 537.2 7 V 4 72 717 AA:17 73,/ AM 2/e/5 117 7177.50 ''Z'.•,i ',..,, .".., !tet^.1,,,,,'g.',1_,'Ai 41, 991 AM PERIOD 190:0•12:001 0100 UIR 2 TOTAL PM HMCO(12,00•24.001 DM I DIRE TOTAL EWE:ORE,::,MAI Pi'.",,: 72277 2117273017770 73,34 AM.7215.32 7m3 71 v.:A.Y.70 C:r!...1,ATI ..'M "'EA'....A,1".9: • , 117994 TM ,FAK,-,F,V":,:o.,1_ --::•,, 444 '., MI 9"A037.217.777-11 11:7 111,-V:077772377, (Al 121-2 72203 7737 117 AM 0717 20/1 07271 100 72.3 7733 2270 3017 NON COMMUTER PERIOD 109770-12:00) MR 1 DM 2 TOTAL 6..HR.12,14R,04.110!PERIODS 010.* DIA 2 TOTAL 070. 1137,71.110,A,3301 Am 7,73 23727/17.2.777.17 9,1. 2011 914 7,017 91/45..0,-1,15 - 141(III?25 013 AM 37-077 755577 7007-13 201 377' 4 27.1 2.70,3 771 70 -71 7 5 11135:2,72.17-13.71. 3712 3725 7,713 2E47.77020770 22307,77.177,135 7 770 30.77:21.50717.2 50714'...7: 4 7'01 1407,Tr- 270 2M 7,0„07 110 (17 5730.372 230 7,1-1711747115,11.77-74 37., 271(0 5,277 0,503 PIA<-11237737.37.3 575; 501 A 761, 01/1 /77 'TIME-AM 0I01 MR-E TOTAL TIME-AM DITE1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME•PM 0101 RIOT 733T40 TIME•PTA 171101 DIA P TOTAL 11.9,49..19,..1" 11 .10 107199-0010 01 7.7 1-3, 1020-(AT. (37 0.7. 775 !ST 120 117 .237 1272 , 7 32 2,7 15-.2773C- 773 ,32 1237 12.27 377 :',..,^4 ,...,S•,:!",••a,37 131 120 221 ,no-t:-.,-,s 0 1 14 1030.7o25 21 /51 133 17730-,1 73 (II 777 227 7770-773.03 (IV 712 . 15 75.01 02 5 13: 1 3,47-,,,,C.., i':., 07 277 (7 45-71 70 32 1772 2.76 C,641-71 QC 17(1 ,.'" (1,1 2102.21 12 /2/ , 13 2351 23001 771 771 71/7 31110.7110 (VI 375 7.55 27 W..02 0, 22 22 11' 0 17 0010-07 13 '00 5217 322 7!0,-7,07 15, 231 7;10-7%7.7 17 77, 51 .71 70.01 71 1 - F 77 71-131.0 I, 377 712 ' .1,70-7,-0 VI /35 710 2220-77 17 N .;? 112 01(7.7111' 2 4 1.99 - 1145 41110 11 21? 374 7(17.17112 112 351 725 27 75•1151 732 -17 71 ,13 172 199.,-(94999. 1 -1 0 0770.1110 ?4 103 17? 0227-02.0 577 253 0271.70.00 77 A. I4i4 17II, ,,.::,.11 r 2 73 05/3.18 03 77. 177 752 77 7.1-527 13 503 0: 1.13. 01207-7707 13 12 0,1 (730.3-71.70 7 - ., 12 77 02 1077 .03, 705 210 77 VT-TV 45 13-4 13.2 272 21 32-0377 15 07 127 733 71.419-41; '. ' .'J 1,:. V 49:•77.27 (127 /71 337 4742•317 14 '11 131 14 T.E.I!,-.07 70 .3 21 /10 27 72 7317 5 . ., 0 0377-70-75 • 71 1273 717 0(717-2010 142 127 271 0772-00 17 373 57 (I? 73 10 017 12 ' 4 (1 3315.7330 S, 711 737 73 17.70 22) 7737 727 735 03 72 (5(1 0037.7.3 7! 4 2 1? 71/7.',I,,AT OVA .50 77-7112 121 (4 217 73 37.22 17 2.7 14 1.1 ('241.71 22 , 02 07 2317.0,73 05 1-17 711 77 1.51-110 10.1 177 320 7312 310/ 72 0.1 73 57 77.117/7 5 , II, 31 107777-170- 1C17 14? 771 CA 72 71/5 177 151 777 1270.17/5 12 '',.IS..C.,,r., 4 '4 19 (3(0-1512 IV 131 77, 77/0.EA.V., (4: 734 1017.01.75 10 ..4 0137-CA 41. 25 11 Al 133 371 CA 37-731 15. 2,7 11 352 10321 17 72 37 22 77 7777.7537 :A "L"-: 4, 1141 "111 (4 141 707 213 717 771 .215.-1.77 07 22 5.2 1 e7.17.13'2 77 0. ,111. 737 .75, 52777-075 0 701 172 307 ,'77.11 37 77 1.1, 75 21 1.27 37 77 20 21 '13551272 34 1117 127 73 0. 503 77 171 '27 377 II.1.5..3,20 7.2 2 51 V.72 ,:•1 41 37 '.i.r: 1-3 1272-1242 701- (II 272 01 77 75/2 -/7 27 277 3122 117% 01 12 42 27 77.71 27 13 (31 II 70-37 77, %A 157 777 70.71 27-77(7 132 121 273 I 1-I,-1 EIP ', 1'1 hwypdo07 8080/orde../Pp=101 3 502450064167a.1\10:RP:PS COUNTNU MBER,P6_SURVEY_DAY.31006,1,1 112 • . . • 1 ' 1012i3!2020 1 5%-1,nute Report. • I • 1 , r050 Date:I,,....:'••I • State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation.Highways Division 1 15 Minute Volume Report . Site*:57111.4x7;144 Towns HS'.10, 0100 to•IIIII DIR 21 1.10 Final MDT:'017.1 Functional Cr=,III:E,M:E•I'rE:I.V.. Count TypE,YIIA.ti, Counter Typc Ps:, ' Route Ne:7.21/ Location; DATE,15-DOC-Id • , AM COMMLITtR PERIOD E05:00.-0•MIV RIOT DIR 2 TOM!. PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15,00-19,00 DIR I DIR 2 TOTAL 520.2-22 42•71p)stAt 0 EAK ..,,.r...,,n,,,D:r4c-2N,,,,,71.0/ 211.1. LOOK 1.7.%Alt C''5 AIM"7..42 1,Met AM '1,0<...3s1:74,Mt. 770 s'17. 1.7kt 71,1 S-10.<1.2..../71,..177 131 1,1111 A`,1•71 342171511331, /13 714 0I7/2/21//2' ,12A-1122< :22.42 14,2 ' 1417 17.77-S17717s, 5910 42 1. 1/1/1 121.V 2.1K21<222 1/t..N0 1.717t20.77"..At i IRK 2121•PFA<F.71<712,12 71 00 Ass1 sc.72,77 AM +7715 10S7 Ip'1 .7 AN, 2111•+7.1.,S11t-011711.t7 5 2355'y 52 5;5 55,1 A 0i)71.1.s.1:7011 071 .0172 1171,7 24/21,401/ ,77, 007 7,7,71 07 eSt7.r k'7727.ts 1,t. 777 17. . . 2 API PERI co 401200-123301 DAD 1 0002 T01510 PM P10100(12010-24401 DIR I DIR 2 Ttrred. '1125115 q.5550/3441,-PISA( 1177,777.71/07":777,i12,..01.7 Al2.FM 1/7s PIPs '71 tc,41/1,13/2 MO PM 71...s4,,Et 1/MO .11.1-7,17 st CCC',: e‘271-'72A10727.1r-S-11.,1. :=r, .111 1,/PC , pm NA('•.7,177:s771.11. 7 St /29/ NV..<<A1222A,26. 2,1/A 211.2-{1122c12.1,121,2, 222 AM-{119121 7777 mit PM-0120t. /5?'. 40 12 1/0' PION COMMUTER PERI OD 401,40-1SMO) DIRT 0102 TOM 6-HP.12•1111.2441R PERIODS ' DID 1 DID 2 TOTAL 1121522:12512,255'53.1530 2110K .427..s.0st.17it.71.7)10,1S+,IS.'1/C. • 2C.7.7 +8777 014117." PIPS.11t 1.1.0i. .7 777 PM'o:"CO,t'M Al,..'4,,,1Ct41ltt.'n 4/4"..1.O,/,%."' 7.777 4242% 4F,A<-1Z 111'....ust . 117 5'7 s.7,771t 1,4 2:.711,17E++77717-11:.177 77770 S.111 2.771 s+P5,7 • r7t1it7:07.7..N.St.,t As: 77.1 17-400 07 SP 772 t1,177.747.72 7,...7:73 st-,.7. .141/ ,I i 00 PP,111.1t 77,7 PM 7:3 00 77.1 CII IC ps1 t,,7211101,1 .74-14-1,it'iAt1/O.,ts2 CC-/A 1/'4, /471 Sq.?. Its.1s1 PDX_+-7,,V01.+7P/11. 177 7:1107 .11/5.1 17,1,2 100 . _ TIME-AM D0R1 DM 2 TOTAL TIME•AAA D11/I1 0152 TOTAL 17174P.PM DWI 0103 10T01 TIME-PM DIR1 DID 2 TOTAL ip . 15 2555,15-55555 43 45; '5.5 ,2 QC-14 12 "17 Ii 443 34253./221/ III •1•••:?. 111.2,1//C' 15 17 27 0.7 15 1037/ 47 I,: tr..+7, 72 77':431/ •72 712 711/ 0071S-7s.1 20 775 17S 2.30 17/1'/.//21/ +, st 7, 5,,1I1 ;...,21 n. 1.$5 730. '2//i-17011 222 107 /11 22.6n.(HAS 1!!;; ')? 295 172,1.01 DA 10 Ii IA .sS.stS s 77700 /1 li/I 77.7 12.174-01M, '.S. 17,-S Cr, ,..:6.,:s-CF 510 122 125 215 55 CO'5.1 15 I 4 13 551/5-CT 12 Cl 13/ 275 11 552'31 71 713 1/4 245 ' 1113/-133 1"3 777, C1 11,7 7 s +02, '1/IA-07.2p.,, 77. 7.44 2'A 721 1s2-771 2.7. 141 7.7.2 .77 15.-CI 22, 155- 45 155 015311.•5.2 4+2 1/ ' 17 07555.17 43 123 77t+0 of 01 71.7-1,A.71 1(1/ 1772 71174 72251-1/7452 50' 12 115, 11/01,•CO02 3 2- 12 7...1.7. t1i/27 7.01 ' 7,7 SP.S. 113 413.25 31% 15.1 7417 07,f. 1711.70 P9 12 ''Cl CC/C.71.7711. A 1 Ii 021077-/51/ SP PIP, 21222: 22:2.122-211'121. 1/2 713 /73 137/21,11 15/13- 13 13 III • E.O.I:,.,..;,7P 4 / 7 77114 -22 30 95 ,/'/) 13S1 31 13•722 7.* :12 "*.$ •i.-,2 /212..<a 211 ;A SA 1710 '0-2 30.P7..75 3 17 ' 0 n's 00- 31-1S IS 113 /573= CO 173"17143 147 115 27,7 1771:PO.OP'15 C7 Cl Its .71 41.,•0771C 1 7 71 .77;241,.1/0/9/ '4'. 1,C 114. 555.73-71733 AC *,' /14 551 35•553 DP 55 ,..', 0,4 OP+10,07.1.s. 0 7 1:1 270.7' ritiss AC. 142 9,,2 2._2"A .72,1S. 11.77 1.72. ".;',1/Cl c;-r.-o-09 17.7 7£ 2' 11/1 , .02,,5 13/5 1 A .' K 313 /53 315/5"115/3 777 317 533 =311/ 111171 134 41 13313-15 2.. 2 2 19 22 20-7,4i, As. 1.77 5/3 11133--4541 171 '5' 71.5 25 11-1`1,4 57 7+7 ONE /41/C ', -...'.. 10 ':2.0/ ,,,,..,...., 0,-: 113 252 95 41;-7+4 CP :121 12-2 920 0.7.1/."2.PO 17 17 ... 2471-CM 25 t '4 272 11.54 s 10 1/ 101 145 7.7-I) .171.S.P7.14/1 113 142 771 70077.10 12 70 41/ C2 2.4 Is-CA tit., A tO 74,1,4'.•123/ /A 11I 371 331 3113'.•:_,3(3 '4' .K.,'", 11/11/-13.1.iL 41 4/ t-tt; ,:4',3i;-/24.1/ '7 27 2:1 112 222 1343= 133 /23 04:4,5 L'4 4.; 1111 'AC 3173 17.30 1.212 /1 7,3 . CI N...t i-35 33 33 43 13,19 '12/ iii 1171 1",,, 14.45'111 11 199 121 2117 52532•rpC2 35 NI 552 22,555 5C4'Pi ts /2. -1:t 711 ICC 55/ 143 13-353 37 `I,/ 171 /531 1'25-'113 33 , 4-A3,., 1/1 133 13 32 343 53 3311 71 133-17 33 777 112 251 333 713 31531 73" 742 /43 11 11•'131 32 13 511 31-1/4 lt 712 .7.4 ;0 11/O Ott,: 1'22 017 222 771 344 55 411 143 ,,..y., (CI ,r..-7, !,,'.. 31 '5 -1.5 70 21..'7+5,0, AC 72e /94 'CI' '/2 /V 25 212,-212.2221 1'', CII11222 7'All-1/ill " 15 /1 -;dvvypdc.,07:80,80/ordsif?p--1 01 3 6024500341676::NORP:PLCOUNT_NUMBER,P8_SURVEY_D,AY-.31 936:13 112 • ... . • . , : ., • 10726/2020 15 Mim.:17,PRI:0,i State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation,Highways Division IS Minute Volume Report Site ID;:'f"I':4n,r..,..': Tosvm',.‘va DM 1:''i" DM 2:: 7.0 filsal MDT,'17017. ' Fundional Class: !.1t4A^:'..-0,F,,SA Count Type,01200 Counter Typv:,,..1,. Route No:1-.14:' Loczliem 00TE,31-1411.17 e . AM COMMUTER PER100(05100-01:013) 01.01 MR 2 TO1.A1 PM CoMMITItit P00400 415,00.10100) 0111 1 DiR 2 10101. . .i..,•:7.7.,,ii,,1/OI,, .`,..::.FS03102 0017 1101 ,';,,,K,r1,01.11 I'M AM-zi 44*.,,L V:,',V: 171' tM,1F44,q,-*.1::,,Mi 4i r ',°,7 10 , 4.21.K.,A,7,:..,..,.. J 171 c7'01451 1 211 ,11,3 ;7.35, 33.53 34 12 315 032-7734, 2/21 1313 115 5,7iy).073411,2< 3.2213511.11,,,,;143 AM 1'457,11°M. Al'.C.C,i.-7.0,AN, 04101..0011,0'30'143 '070 07.2(071,W S,..,Mtc,.....,;:;.M ,,!...,V,C.,+.*,-4 Al' 10 A.:Pi,,,1.:.,0 '41 •,,.. 09 7)0,,,.,45 37101.7i 01: 04 201 PERIOD(0 0;00-12:60 Dig 1 010 2 101M. FAI 1010100111200131,00) DUI d OM 2 TMA1 ' I .-w-,..,;•,,,-./555355,34,-2713,5,3 "V;0,,51373331,335.13955 241•71511 r5%35317 51 37.417,3577:5 A5,1 MI 0129---e3'4741 1.1.1 ,,`..M 710700.70,..11 0177 422 7051 1.71. 3:11.3;71 55.3532151 11317) 75 1; 21.4 57,2:3333537: 2111 i17t-t.f-4,-.1,'-'4444,- ,70 271-11.13' 2120 "4 32 157 371.00%' 7052 11117 1503; . • , . , ,. .. . . flON COMMUTER PERIOD(01:00-.IS:00) 0)01 DIR 2 TOM& 0.140,12440,24.2111001002 OM 1 01122 Krtx ::::.e,,::::,:p:7,:::.e.1,..IN.A.:11.11: : A/515,155 11352%7 51513,17 54, 1.151 3;31 7.337: 11211.p31,513 1.71110012 11.1120'1Alii AM ..,,i44,+4 C.V'44')4,3::,CF., :01.74 433 315 1.140 7M 5+511 75733:1;32 511:33777 3,533 2270 4,132 7215001 27/1 11/7 171 30:1135114.557,111'.,:471.52; 3110, :.0f 01 190 ri'm,,,,log 11,10.1.131.1 41 135 3551 444,100 77 AM 1 0,711.130071 17 7045411.3 01377, .071, fl.A<,,,ii000..,Mi - 1.30 1,i' Cl' 4/13 2141 '05, TIME-.AIM 1/1R1 DIF:2 11721. 'TIME•AM DIM DM 2 TOTAL TIME-PM 01111 MI 2 12731 11111.1 OM 2 1:0121 11,772.4 33, 7., ..e.i /4 700 - ,.;',. Id 17 03 ,3..,".,'..32.15 11' 307 222 ' 140 235 017.11 75, /2 14 41 15 15-5510 22 37 03 7/'5 1231 :If 1.11. 215 51 13:•51 31 1.11 172 224 7221 2411 14 . 231 44. 5120 11.43 .* 51 93 7031.1243 122 214 731 7126-rx:eA5 115 ,(6 055 1247'0111.' 21 11.. V. 111 43-5217 21 50 001 12"43-03 115 '22 121 2,,4 055.45-02 05 151 1.4,1 79-4 fir 11 11 13, 13 IA 2; 5705 2113 02 32. ,.?.4 c''.c.4.2•01 1!. 141 111 20) 0231-0313 245 1:1 31: 1;31.1150 4 . 1.7 12 4441.5-04 1,.., 42 ,1 i V:0 !:,15-11 21 114 191 0.4.4 ,L)'IS-55 3p III 113 2331 ./1 251 55:415 ;4 .4 . 2:3 ,IM-r:Z42 70 1.112 052 , 01,13'2141 '15 1.01 141 03 21.:12 75 111 111 071 _ :5345•532 11 1 5. e.1 45 e 7.4.-!n. 72 '0' 74.1, 13/5.02 75 '11 1/2 /10 0147.1311 32? .M. 21' 1'110'71.'0 5 , 1 14 4?ci-7,--r.a1fL P.:i 305 514 121111-751,53 000 104 :704 ,3001,i71.0.': i114 .0: '.00 -00001 11 4 77 ,,,,,.: .50 01 ti 2$2 44k. N 1"--'4%-':0,1 '0 q 1 2.151 011.11-'A ii1 /ter, 3e, 1.1) 71230-30-41 5 4 ;,,, 1505 014a a2 21.1 151 55 55-55,1 '22 1,,,11 113 1.1.111,74.01. 142 77 115 12 40-12423 5: 1, 15 5547•5705 lap 07.1. 1,C., ,,,,,,f.+.M 51 52; 255 7111 4,.4.4--.zr 4;,-, 4-.., M. II, 00 75-57515 1 4 .. tr;,.Z. 11014 15" '/4 224 0000-01'') '11 121 21, 0+0 r7.1,.(9% ,,, 11 1:00: 70.1.7-32-71, 1 5 . , _ 1 293-'1340 315 112 012 13 17•571 31.1 '02 314 2231 15,5•11 11 24 17' ;15 1715••'..,I4.... 1 4 17: 71,r,-,11,..i. :.,.. 71.1 0110' 05 11-01 47 002 ?-..t. :;'''.F. :7730.c-,3 41, 14 ,,. 13041.0010. 4 7 1 441.4..: 1 r:,4.? 114 ,73 0/1 13 11::)4 CC 100 1101 200 11:40 1,0 g0 01 01 77 01 01.04:5 7 2 _ . 1111-57,1 131 117 251 54 07.34 If 1453 "01 157 1111,15'5 44 43. 3,7 5 2, 11 011,e 111:1 V 7.71 744 210,0''III': 154 '20" :00 10,0-1231 S. '10 .71 01.71-0400 , 7 10 11431 1041 77 531 23/5 14 30•0443 0135 3.22 232 1/11,11457 '5 34 ;20 14 17•511,55 3 :3 17 11 45-11 50 5. 145 1445•:AN '742 1.21 025 '142•11 07 4.1 47 10 1571'01') 1 17 04 .3,1.5 1"',1 114 'e':e!ee 74, CeS.CQ e e'..e.J '537 130 111.71'I'17 21 35 117 ..i 15 --4:-0'0, 1.0 17 77, 1111451150 51 103 00) 0012 0,5:,.`01 213 17/ 11; 11 75•13 223 3/ 72 11 2724 270,11 10 00 51 1321.1141 'r 141 2,4 ':700-71,45 2531 401 1100 31 41 41 35 112 '5 23: 42 ',.*e'"1." ,e01 1..e? 10.: 0545-1 702 121 513 3;4/-13.77, 20 4., hwypdc:07'8080/opds/Pc...-101-3:602450064167&.NO:RP:P8 COUNT_NUMBER,P8_,SURVEY_DAY:32874,31 1/2 • . . _ . . . • • . . . • . 10i)(V-2020 i 5%ki,...1F.,Repo". State of Hawaii Department of Transportation.Highways Division Run DMA -., 7 . IS Minute Volume Report • Site 01 22 I 2-151',', Town:,,,, DIRT:,Ni DM 2: .51 Final MDR 11752 functional CIaos:,1<28 .:1 5175,3 Count Typo:511<52 .Counter Typo:ill', Route No:;,15, Locaticro DAM-3 1-201,1 5 . ) , AM COMMUIER PN,100(05,a,09,3 IN COR1 DIR 2 101,0 PM COMMUTER PERIOD 1.15:013.19,31N DID 1 SIRS 10101 '1,51f..-,AE•7•,3',ie,_,ZAK 71227157-5755557145 I AV 537,,<21',1' 5151151 t1-,51 4v, "11 11:1,4 55-5'451: AV, =1112,11 v.,.,2,1. ,,,, ,...m ;,/A4111.111.,,,..N,1 ..! 11 1 ,S+, 20,:g.:,,,2 Ill Al.0.453, 5151-4 11507 221-52'S 2131 ;3 11 75-7 711127 3524351 1224 71•W;^AA!111111 111 1•FAS 151-,ma cs.z Ay%,,n,.,..1 AY SIAM Tt 51,121114 1-A1 15./4 f 42,1-1111- 5 ;•y•,‘,..;15 3 3, 4,41:,,3,,,,5245,44 PN 11E4 501 547,21 '.-A 1 1.151 -,..:,' .. . „ _ . -• . 102 51511100 WIN10-12101 DIA 1 UM 2 TOM PM PERIOD 02:0P.2.1:001 DID i DID 2 TUFA IIIN-,::,•"•1115•,o:,.•,,1,5512 1'152 511435.71.111141.2E44 AM-1 525(347 1135, .15 15 454 iv 2,253,AM 431 ASA<GA17541 2 5.15504'5 7.12<'.1 • AM-,,,,,ti Al,V73.51.50 3,5 421 4731 ,v, 4175,2 145724,55.715145 312 7'5 14 23 AM-2121<21 I s 1-3,.E17,341-57,372 All 31,24, 111! 1414 151 1137 51S, 1153 13 17 102 I .. . . . . . . . .. . . . ' ' •• -'' . . , 2. . . NON COMMUTER PERIOD(OR 00.12:00) DM 1 DIR 2 TOTAI 55-551512.1115 24A-IR PERIODS MR i DID 2 TOTAL II2r2,2121.r,:•1:81 01 AO 153152,15i..,, e, Xf U.^„':rj, 1111 .7,i AK,O,.1431 52,25,5251,3 1121,1 Am 241 1,,r,FOR:CO 2 5371 15151-- 1154 4 311 13142•555555,13,57A5 424 715 ,511 734 E.7.7,2:125:2,,55,2:55.2;,:x 31,12 53E1 E 27,3 54411 3,12521< 714•3-3,47-7"371.171'2 7455,5, 3-47," 5 114 1151 ' 455445 55.5 1,31, 1121 FM,53,e514 1-,a AM I,112511.22 1,1,51 i,"N245:47„r,r11-1.4 D.)! 2011 2114 17,75 45A4:515V23.7,2517 535 7554 23E 25532 53 42 Tim'1114 D1R 1 DID a TOTAL NME•AM 1301 MA 2 TOTAL 11551[.PM DON MI 2 201.15 TIME.FM P1111 MP 1 TOTAL ':'.,:, 14 102.05211 14 34 13-57.12(3 '1' 1231 321 <211,1.14.10 27.; 145 ESE 1314-12 2,5 52. 18 25 1515-1<32 71 41 152 12 53 12-32 112 155 175 71 15.Of Ef 151 123 224 1520.1144 24 21 AA GE 30•12 45 15 15 1 232-i 241 122 711 213. 24212-1281 <15 'IA 2031 1344-11E1. 51 . 53 .3<34<-5.32 14 2/ 111 1245-1110 "214 133 234 4E4S-1122 151 144 127 51 02-01 5 5 '3 14 2 i 35715 11,1 ES 7E -154 . 5115-01 II 147 131 5111 1 i 02.55,15 117 212, ,A1 IS.i111-1,7 ., 12 IA 151-15-•,,•'1.,;, 12 ,.i 1`,0 21 1!--PI;.,A0 )1'4 5.1":r., 1211 "2111-132 1511 135 341 , -212245 11 5 22 .1137-1145 1.5 152. 215 <I.112 5141 123 1.:0 15, 1,1 370 51 45.7.1 01 3 5 14 05,45.753 •., /2 ,e,.: 5131 5125.51152 1754 1,11 2E4 27 411-11 315 .,,,,, 33 21; 21 12.0515 5 1 14 012E1-14 15 111 ECG 214 22113-55.11. '13 17571 33E4 a.,-.1-,-.,.7.&1!.. 321 11 1,4 „..!1:1.,:;',.5T 11 .,, 17 1'1,.74 31 41 235 12 11 1A-511 E2 1753 131 311 <5111,15111 25.55 12 131 . 2230.2E4: 1 4 11 02 2,:, 1,1-11 13 7351, 455 C125525581 152 5E2 13E 2330-045 123 57 552 22--6-r51-115: -1. 1. IS 25 47,-05 253 1750 3747, 1.1.5 725 45 525170 ,11 •,,..* 351 :'..2.i:-C..".4 X P 18 1 o,•,,5.n11 ' 3 3 03E72 CV41, 111 ,14 4111 53 351-5 i"5 15' 133 754 31 37 13•3 I 5112-51.111. 3 . 4, . 2 -7112-053E1 1315 1,51 115 2535-25 325 413 1E.4 1215 .2.315.55151 24 55 11t • -212525111 . 7 2. .tt '.:'.':'..1-i:,,45 '-.".' 23 2551 25 3f 5 355 45 .114 ,514 :r..-F- 11A ii,.1141 23 "5 111 1341---111 0 A I 2545•1051 114 5;:-; 2,11 1545 24552 115 1517 231 7511-ILI Or: 17 41 -17 7.4 SG•24 11 - 2 ' 1,3,:c. 102f 55 1111 234 54101 14,! ".157 125 5117 11175•13 15 22 1., . '1411-1,3,, !.. -, •_ II 11 111-111E5 11 111 541 1.4 45.-111 251 152 5111 11,11-,ti-50 SA -51 1,-,..,,,•,,,,,, ,, . 7 1,17 1-1.Y,-7,24f -Si 1.547 2E5 724 K.7.4 412 2145 132 3E7 13E5 5,45 45 '8 172 -14 41.171.755 7 12 17 1045 *1 CO ,52 541 1712 03245-2252 715 T44 115 "57.45.1-11 10 41 41 27 7,45 OE-ft,.51 q 54 ,1,17 11 14 154 441 153 5155,52.15 3,5 5,75 557 1110.11” 13 35 55 15 Ef 3155 15 17 CII 11 11 11 31 75. 15., 212 1352.5.75 371 213 154 211 1,15-11352 51 42 if SEGO OE 43 11 15' 115.77•'142 21 1.31 134 ,-5 571.55 435. . 174 111 411 5171.11.74 41 12 52 hvaypdc07`8080/ords/f?p,--101-3.80245006,41.676::NO RP:PS COUNT_NUMBER,P8_51JRVEY_DAY:32874,31 1/2 . . 1. • • 1 • . 1 . . . , 1 1(1(26/2020 i !,.1,nt.t.a Per:ort. Run Date,..E..-.:('77 State of Hawaii,Deportment of Transportation.Kohways Division . 1S Minute Volume Report Site ID: ','t 1E.VAO:44 Town:'7/_i• MR 1:••YE; DIR 2: '7/ Final MOTE,4775 Functional Oa..ER43A,/CD,'5:41.:E... Count Type:7/4C7 Counter Ty(i,C's Route 14a::,.., lotaDcm DAM:01-AUG,I7 . AM COMMUTER PERIOD 10 210.0700) DIR 1 0102 TOTAL PM(0/. 41 PERIOD(157/0.131001 DIR I DIR 2 TOTAL W.K..:721(74.74434(55455 154,52 a,05657,055102.04/ AM 57:A5 57.10111 45/5 0124:117/4/A ANI-1',,,,C,,,,111,74 $1.1,17 P4.21'7,,72 AM.S7/1,1,73 1/''7/+14 .11.,711 141/ '''4t '554K 1452 5001550, 030 2,2 1 552 /125.1 4 555:20,,5,30i,, 5 32 'IV 2 t/2-25151521/ 0.55 A54 na; ,.,,,- . ...,7/ 1,21; r'm-rx- ., m:7,...I/Au r..,,: .,.16',:s:-.,,,,"NA'1 6,AC 1,,,.6.EAK 1665 5003 0723 Al,64512 AM 51362 AM 0:010 AM PM.70005 11,135 /11 1.14 55.,6 0 534 AC':55 ,,,14, ,1555 512 560 5/2 1 35 t 55,52 , 47/1.1-,,,,;,K2-5-6,,,,,r ;;;?:.., ' AM PERIOD WOAD-MAO) DiR 1 DM 2 • IOTA% PM PERIOD 02400.24A01 DIR I 0102 TOTAL '717/15/2111:74 REA< DA,O n,R74 1E:DE.4E,EAK AM-IDA4(1.155 5015 0 CO 0,20..,.,i-.7.C"f:4111 PM•PEW m/41741 , 77/77,,,,,e,2(Al AM 4144 51551035,11215 71,# -..V.,0 5471' PM CI 747/',055045.05q 552 , t 252 455-5 40,01531200, 0115 17.0 1,500550.45 AM-DA" . 70 50 7.1 11 122 PM 5.222, 512 2.7 1/12 '03 1 tIDN COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15260) DM I DIR 2 IOTA 6440.1211.12,24140 PERIODS ,DIR t DIR 2 TOTAL 1102 2021110/74 01522 4215-'02 05.5.635172355171.Cs)f 2 022 6120(204 1505 /1775 47/1r..112'.27,424 AM 16.'0 111,-CI,/7/157.122>- 5 2517 4155 515,5 312 V75.1.0215 ''' 654 2 152 ui,ac., ..1.m.,a:.:0 31.17' 14-51151-63/0,1205 ' , e7.2, 5505 455 062403, 4 02 10 t,61 IA(052 1.144 042 PM 5,1 415,157 0250 AM;,,','..?,Y,V,r, 14-140,45511,05--12 01-64,031 201 5035 ,T,15 111.5,0 064 211613242 3-33 20 r,,,' 4:,-.,9 72/C "03 . . 111,51-0,110 DM/ UR 2 TOME 7/MO'MA 01/1/ MR 2 10101 TEM-PM DERE RIR 2 TOM, 7/141-PEA DUI 011/P TOTAA MD!,•1E-D. n F. 47 EE E7E.64.,T(.• 0 7'S 4.5 1519-:2 T!, "%, 57/ 'r-,,,'' ',.,:',:', 4,,S 451 17/ /72 3555.12 513 1172 CA 3,07 00375 - 31 44 66 12 12 1250 112 215 553 2531 1."•01,7-35 20 12, 01 130 1542 ',2 15 020.744/ .‘,65 57 115/ 12 30.112 45 124 005 30. '0250-50345 ,C., CCC " 2551 1345-01 225 .,., -5, .35 044 -000 11 'PS, 159 17.41-1/154 :f 151 235 1240-C g:A I/(' 144 lit"' 2510.54 I2 7/ 6 60 11632-023 St .103 135 2,312.2,15 :7' 17/ 2'2 3035.07/2 '73 50 221 • 0,17.2166 1 7/ 52 Srti-02 25 /4 25,.• .17/: 5,I1..47/2.5 ,DE III 744. DE15-OE 7E, 1(1 EED 2(1 EEI EiE•OEAE si 1 115 5551. 7/47 v 2/1. .77 ,:r;!.:,•.:.,,,.,.. 1/C 142 253 3545-357 55 1605 5,5 511 0.36.5.2 0 7 7 ./ 2247.0,60 01 1/3 501 0;413-52 ro 44 t/4 CE.. 7,74.7''CA CO 11.3 ',"?.r; 57 05,C.,11., 11 1 CC, (1,411,..:-+7.11, 1.1 7/1,1 423 352 035•0652 11/ 142 50 100.0615 CCI 31 1-1: 35 15,.001 1 A , 175-714/i 53: 516 4555- 0 16,..,,,a r, /..,. 1,4. 5/11•53 22 102 15 .07 00.,.2.,,1 - CC -17 17,7,.-504'1 35 254 - 06 /227 32.43 154 1521 610 552/5 7041 1, 2.2 104 601 42-5.00 5 2 1' 11140.060, 1(4. 20'5 05 2241-025 1C4 MO 7/E 14,11..71 56, 50 0.5 1 52 05 541-0.12 C. • 12, ('1/47-17/C/ 1r,s, 1/4 E,EE„. 1..7^.r.1-71111 147 1E.7. 7"74 .ns c-7-49'5 55 0 153 5515'552,36, 5 3 '1:6 5050.5111 • 155 5.25 615 25 1":-D3nt 120 739 03 /911.05 30 61 42 134 050-55542 2 5 • 22 17.5242 '4 665 252 -265 70.02 42 15-5 1:55 246 010.000.7 V: Yi 110 65941,.34 0 3 2 6345 1500 010 151 251 52/4/ (ACT 166 1,13 166 0050 150 52 5, ;t 1 54 301.111 IS ..' 2 /5 1002 107 '(4 143 140 01 50,.01 ff 1/1, 134 75.1 1223'12°F. 62 M 5-4,0.•DeE DO 4 12 In 11,-1*.1,4, ^02 III 2I.,11 1192 15, 41? 14,1/, 22520 41 71 b4;a•c4.,,..,, 0 13 1215 ;240 00 12, "35'. 24.23.0606 252 726 345 1.50-5545 /0 0 56 34 42-14 0 7 ,.5 51 '334.1 51 SO 054 10 /21' /$,,C1.55//. 133 05, 214 11347 11 03 75 A!. 21 1414-/4-'.. , . 18 A? 11e. --11111 I'D 1,E,,,E,, 7E4,4 14Oc.-21'4E. ID Ell ME POO-,1E IA 'EI .E.,. 511E-000 15 50 11 ",53-,175,7 533 117 051 505'7.602 40 121 512 322 1215•II 65 ,..,, i,. 1/, 610,62 42 11 22 .44 1171,, 11,,, 411 174S 411 34.1 7141,/IS 224 772. :7'123, 117,1I. ,,tS, IIE, 7,, CI 1 C 4/ 15 ,542-1530 143 7/7 5242-20,3 517 5711 535 1 1 45-11 32 7/6 35 ''7 , . hmTdc07:80.30/orde?pr101.3.6024500641675:.NO:RP:P8,_COUNT NUMBER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:32874.1 1/2 1 . , . . • . , ! . , 1 , IC1725j2021 15 M,n,Ze,Report •• 1 I,, Atc, .,",, - State of Hawoii Npartment of Transportation,Highways Division • o ;.^ ,..0 . 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID:iMI 1 A!,:,.,', Town: ,,,,,, DIA t:.3,77 DIAZ: 147 POO MDT:AL77:71 Functional CEms:1177A1144741171717. Count Type;' All - Counter Typo 744- Route No:71,7 L.7.17kA: DATA:20-NOV-IS AM COMMUTER PER100 10571ATEAMIN DIRT EAR 2 nora PM COMPALTIM2 PERIOD(15:00.19:00: DIR II " OM 2 TORN. 144 D'AFTTI:11417.:41-C ,W74..00.,,E,:lEIN,.50 11.54 AM ,EAK,547,11I '77 PA AM'oPFL'77 AM FM7 711.0-.,i 0.0 1 1!.,Y..0.:,,,,p., AV 1111,4:',AM wi 4,-, 1.,:,,1 ,....,,,,,/ -Ti-',LAX',A:11E.05AL ..'I 1,1 04,50 0,;A,:-7„..,,,Ai, 11,1 PM, 1114,1744, AM 1,-%- • MM "44 r:A 112 474% 4.'4, M J. 0.0.550; ,,00EZr570,E0.101.,-EA,0 AM MAT.00',-NE 71141144 12,101E5E-A4 010'.„,Am,,, 11;.:,14,: P. :14<1:11 11ME 4 L711 II AT 142 71'1, i,AE 0.5,0,54.000,E, AM 0"0.00,,^3.050.5.50: 45 1-,',., IV 0E,n,.:-4 5,.e.:°,00500? 5,;2 5,0 .. .. . ... . . . . — , — AM PERIM 100100.12:00) 0101 DIR 2 . TOTAL PM PERIOD 451:0044171101 DIR; MR 2 TOTAL APP ETAT 1VT:DIA777717171A 11,14 AM 1 PAK HD 1,y,:-: 11,111A,,,,z,T 00 AM WM.PEAR ATR TNI A,5.'"..f,A 5'05 114 0554 ,105,K040:5000.5,0.01 444 "*.?, 1,141 AM ?i,A5c t*.,..,:,,,Ow 50,5 ,,,, 1 AV A 4144414k 5,0? '451-5 Al .1, AM. 900060 2,A,H °°"0 ' III TM 159E, 444 1.3.0 010E0 .-. — . .. NON COMMUTER PEMOD 4,09,DO•IMO) 010 1 0502 TOTAL 6-NA 12•14R.24•}1f1PERIODS 0505 MR 2 TOTAL 3:g7,0•00144E00350 y0110: 1-141-,A11:11111'„,e41.,7'IL 2.121 1111/ ,:11 ALA,:..5 l ME 7 44:111'177 70 TM 014 0?-,00i.r,r,,,,x;:.,,,, ,,z iv .1'C i, 21411 177,74 • PFAL.74M147TML 620 012 :;214 14 i',00-',EF05.7,0,000.EA.?KC, A''.:5 i2°E.00, L5sEE0E0 E.00.4A1 1001,: AM 17.1001,.11c7f, '..:.:.:41:1, 1:112. 4,,,i* ICA.<,, :144 ,c,,,ly,!-.:;,:i•,r,m :44114 IA,1..7,0,5, 1„A c,,AtOn 0;i,:>-;-?.:441 1,,171 ,,:':: ,1•Sr1 422 . MI 1774 4.1..? TIME.JIM CAM DIRT lOTAI TIME•AM DEM LAR 2 TOTAL TIME.PM 0101 LAD? TOTAL TIME-PM DIEL MR 1 TOTAL I14117-17.77, 11 4 147 ECF11F.NE'7 41 :117 ITT 44411 17 IL 1TT 1p.PF 71.1 4477,11141- /P1 1E:1 47A ATTE,•:2.?1,, 8 1'; '4 Ck;IS,.Ef.:3E0 El ,23 17.1 02,..° 12 2E0 '..?: 13E 2,.:..”, L',..--r,.,"Y.?,', IAA 11 0.0?-0 0.2110 11001 4, 4 -1E 1E0.E.0 0,:,x.0,70 ..10:0 P.a. NE. 7p.31,•12 Al' 1..,,,, 1441 :•:, 44n.062.!.. pp; :01 .01, , .. .. T': i.X.:'...-,:,;.4",,3 110, 411 :;0.I ;Z 4i,-01.00. ',Az MA 2°A, 0.E.4,-.,0C,i.°A:0. 7,;,,..4 A-; lAt., 1 .0 00 0 15 A t E 0000°1 (101.1 000 24 M3 01,7•01 0.! Pr'? •SI LII '100.5.0010-1. 114 070 lIp. 71 11-1411 ,. .. -17,5-U10 111, 2E40 ..101 EX,,$-2141 IN 171 TA: A IS.117'3Cr re II 111 01:1'0-,),AL , ,.. ..1 a 0007??..07••1 pr, w. 217 171 AT'-DI PE 1'11 E,..? 11.1. 0,50 i.'. E4.0 .CC'X 1:0 , ',, E,01.05 01., ,:, 021 270. AM 0-.00 1::'i.1,2 00 16E. 411 341:, :),* )3 V 14 17 1-22 7 7 13111.11111, 71,1, 177 CT D7-07”., '12 '.,4. 0:9,7 0.A0.1,f..0.”, ;),.• 7,4- 4 4 4 21''...11117 17: . "717, AT/7-CZ AM 14.7 •L 1 1117 ,n*-,411111 114 f-A ,pp 7.2,42 7,1741 3 - . . 01 1121:. 1441 5: 11050 271 DT ET'772.5 1177 122 2111 11114•04°.° AF. CS 112 'Tr 41,.177:D7 7 7 "7 1111411-11717 1111 I,: •rxi r,•-•.••••,i•1‘0,00,5 005.5' 141 PIT A14E.717.AP 17 1M 11 011D0 CLEIE 7' 15 1 177 77.CAM 37 1E' 171- CT 7TD-ALT! 11 7 '71 1:1 7s7E7-DT 1, 7, 5.; Ei3:11---.0:3 ' 5 1E. a,,,,,s '.1c..77, 114 2511 ,..,3:!0 03 P0 1'14 '34 111 7.7:1•03,3, 41 ET 74 TA"4:74,;,, i• ,', pp ''.0,,,'.0.,AA 81 )-', 14;? 1-1111 51-•EE0 Al 157 17.0 1111 00.E.10000.11 45 , Z..-. 11 1.0 1401-4411 4 . 11 EAT77-,,,,cc, 1 C1 'Al' '71,17'771410 7:17 17,4 .7717 PIMP-MIT 12 Al 11 - ,24000.1,1. 4 12 , '00,30: 7015 IN 113 .22a ql,c-2P21,,: n' A1-, 4,1 77-1-,.,,.0`r. 29. IA Ei? ^AM-.7501E. 04 11 21 1 r011.11000 lip. M, 4t4 14.-6.1 7:7 447 1T1 71: A77717 11s.M1, 17 04 4:434-.';',-'444- 14 171 JP, 17411011 F.E., 02.1 TV 1,4 X-04 4:. LII :41 YE 1E01C.1,:i.A.! 200 44 015 :,..4 v.',•:6 0,: ..t., :'-, '3: 10,A5 ,,CO lAf: I'll ,.'.,,A1',.01..03 51,3 ,10 1.,').-1 .0.*.1,V., 111 1s) 11 0,,•::00...E.,' .<1.0 t ,,,;,•11 I'? I IE. 005E2 E,E.E0E..0.55i,t,0 :551 377 14141111 10 , AT 117.,11 1171,30 17 CE 17 1117-1147 17C 12.1 AP PC 12.1.5 TIC777:1 1. 211 1711.173C '417 14 CI 117 T7 CE.41 47 'E., :111 10E0:-"AI P11 ,71 2320 E.'.E,..0 ,..,0.50., ,1.0 07,0 El:, ,.,,7.1,4f E. 10E0 ?.1141,-1.;;'. .,.. ,1.4 Ilf, '1411-1211- pp. '54 ;1,.-, CTI AL-1..CT 77 . 114 1117 1-77 I I 4L-11 11 7 1,1 h,,wpdc071080/ordsif9p,-,101'3:6024500841676:NO:RP:P8 COUNLNUMBERP8_SURVEY_DAY:37544 28 i,'2 . , • 1 , ! — , , I L . • • 1 Of2,3i2020 15 M,n,...,r,eR,,..,..r.,o7t • Po -::, State of Hawaii.Department of Transportation,Hi9hways Division un at.,:- 't' 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID:22 i isO.V3114 1 DR ft.112 DIR Z: F. Fistil RADS:.I122C Evnetionst Case 11111/03,137.2 1101111. Count Type,31,1044 Cantor Type:,,..1.7. Route Nat 1 111 totsticre 0,110.204100,IS AM COMMUTER PERIDD(05010-01004 DIR 1 DIR 2 Torm PM COMMUTER PERIOD 415:00'111001 MR t 0100 TOTAL '743,022,12 71..07324.IPA,: 714.11.,710.12.7322301A,41.A.< OM 11,1,4"41.10.11 CIII.311.4 3,47 It AV' I'M.130,34 OA mou 4,2-13s,32"11...103 AM-I;t...(,A 417,'LI El I '1-01 ...S1,I 1it4,,,.`/I1t1RII 141 toe AM a:.WIL.,A1, 223- PM s'IA,1.I.3s.i3Si 111 AM 113410 2,41 210" I111 'V-OVA- '214' 11,7,22144'vk 21+,4 01.11111,1011,01.1)11 AM t 1011 10111,111 E0.10 AM.41062 AM 32117 0314 1417 15 AA" 1M 212A41-31.11VE 4E1 t 24 11 5:,:012LOLL41402E AM 0.14 '33,11',14333.34,,,, 4.21 111, PM ' • - " . . AM PERIOD.(91200.1E,00.1 0101 0102 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12s20.20004 DM I DIP 2 TOM ..722)1..0,2i3'7,321iIii PLAO — ONO 211 ,2i112%,1,1 e22,2 001 '013341.3031251) 07 ALL 141410 AM PM-ETA')m11 Lw 0'',V 0,-;IS 01.1 AM-MTAK MA VE:o3.021. II-'. PM 11744 m7.1E3306 .,,,, 1 145 AP" A E01117.1140P; 2 tIll "M-2.1117113111A. r ie.4 AM 311533. 1121 1E10 It12 7 PM 27.1111 12-IL 1111 Ii 2. NON COMMUTER PERIOD MOO'IS:NS DIR 1 DM 2 TOTAT, 0440.12.14R 24.21011ER20DS ' OM 1 0102 TOTAL 111371.317111.31,713144Al 11,14 404 31,3334 EELL CIO,.113:01,12'.1, 1.410 OIL 'IA').22 1-Mi 2,37M mt 1121,77,2 AM IZ-417.9474 a ,1-47,-,2 it,, 4 PE.I 2 741 44) 2 FP:011.1,1.1.1) 1.•?.4 ,...,•,,, 1 2;:2.: "46 o A 0E12E11 10E0 0100 4,114 01413 14PT 001011.11131/11-t 010,-1 LV 17.2In 71 1.C.1111114 30E01 MC? t 10,1 4 4111 0111<00 13011 721 001,1 2 0-110112APM 312120 4,2 16,12 4.4,21,24 ,4.112."12112111117 01-74 MO 121-1 . 4224 12,E142 AEA(142311,73342M1E.2.41 (CO CLI 41 47 27.50 42,2 . TIME.AM D101 DIR 2 TOTAL MAE•AM 0104 0100 TOTAI 'TIME.PM DIM 0102 TOM TIME•PM 11401 EPP 0 TOTAL UNE-1E 113. 12 I IL 430.1"-1,1.11 'IL LI 102 11 LI-TOIL ILA ',. , .A.,; ,..,:::,,t,-)12.,!:. its; 121 10) 121,S-11 21: 13 12 21 01E15•121.,EC 42, MI 102 1411,'22) 131 lag 2(1 20.15.`A 2.33't 13223 ILL 275 I 70.0 IA ALL IC- 0. IL 0E20 0,12 II 'VI YEA '010. 2.1) 02 ELE LII UE5.101 2 S 124 02 242 121::,.111,...1. 1 :,. II ,010 -,,,K4., '.1•.? 11:223 Lai 1E 4,,-it.0.1 111:.. 1:i! 'ep- 011.45-04 V, III E'''.' MEL 01 OA.71 IE 0 1 11 4/02,012 1/11 21E4 226 E4.-101, Et 11 111 127 0E7 LETO.I17 10 El -1230 111011121 1 2 II 01-15-,,n.],, IT-I -311 41:: 1111.012) 11,3 '21 0111 r.,;.”...fv g. {,-,,I e4. 17; 01 En.321 0. t , A 11 VIE.374E 't 201 ELI UI.1,1•El 11 111 1412 0E3 ti 2, 1 41 11 12,-42 04 4 2 4 .w 42 ,11:',:, 'CA irg ' 410 E.4 415.CA En 11U ILO 0E4,2 OA 0E 04 pE 'SI 10110•LII) . 4 II P3047.213. 10E .E.E.,, Inc 111.11------11 ,12 I01 221 1:(7122 :24712 ).4 7.2`:, (24 11-11.0,114 1 III ',..2,..112-42,0 III .112 'II ,:.,;', ,::.;.11 1,1 ,:,-.2, ii27 2,1 12-)22,7M 'I, 14 ILL 02 AL.11,01) 2 . 4 7 OE EC.OAS 21 1 S1 277 112 2,0 71P342 202 171 277 110'LI-313 42 22 4, 140 ,22 45-,ELIT II , III EEL".1',12,,, 11, 133 13,1 .23,3.1-1121 III 11.1 212 1511-10.114, 40 :A 0:1:•:, an'', lb -E '1 E13033 EATS 02 ME 1,12 OE CO-44.1 IL 102 11E4 110 OEN-112 12 Q. Al' 111 A E COL .1E204 ,07 112 201 41711.CON 101 447 215 2,72115.61,20 42 22 ',,Z., 4E01''101 131 11 II 0120.1105 )O II) *1 1.:,,,4 III LIE 3,22.0.-C12•22. 21 RI ,,,, 27.42-7427 I 72 IL ,:.,-.,4'3..'flu.? -.!,,, ;FA 211 ,.',s'.13 3,102 21' 111 21* 3's.42.22,a6 Et" 47 ?A :.44.41..44,S •- 24 104,,?.-,S,12 111,4 144 220 EA CS 1A 17 120 122 271 4140.12310 111 41 Er. ',)4,1,4,<'21.15 7 01 Et/ 192312 1011) 117. 1E0 115 24.3./.E4A7 its 2 12'.: 112 11111-1321.. Ir." x III 10.,.,..,c,:.,:,:- 1) 53 42 IN) 1722, 102 140 115 2414313.E5402 24I III .111 ,:.,..1,..,.1,..e.c, 14 II Pt. y, 141 if 52i2••11,S 1:41 12.4 LI-IL ',SS 64.44.Is 741 2E1 7732 111111.II 11 2" m 4c. LOIS 01.,.2) 1:3 01 p,,,, ,{7 1'._:,-14 4,12 13.1 112 1122, •211 11 ,7,5 F.,..:, 101' ETA 1110111011 242 IA .1E410 -0110 13 111 1 MEC•1142 120 01 712 '42 10.ES 41, 127 1111. 113207.7143 10 12 111 111111--11 •.!.. 17.4 '01 F1441.-12 22, 111 '12 LII C.2.22.-42.212 1,, '111 LA1 11 41.-,..;0,2 ,.., I' I:, hy.,ypd,c07 80.80fords.n..-,101-3:60245006.41.676:.140..RP:P8 COUNTNUMBER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:375,14.29 112 . . • ..... - . . , - • • 0/2.31202...) 15!..1,ni:te Report . • Run Date: : ' State of Fiawaii,Department of Transportation.Highways Division . :I.'-:, 15 Minute Volume Report Sae ID:A * 4**??S*TD11144 Town*?..ms.t: DM 1:4 NIT Dal 4: `34' final AMA'MD Finutionat[Taw W.1.1,11;,111241.7294 Count Type: 1.,241 CounterType I 01, Route Ncl 1042 1.0.6C111 DOTE:15-SEP.19 , • . AM COMMUTER PERIOD E05:00.09:001 DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD El 5:00.MU CI1 MR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 7001-J C2212.:2,021412 ZAK 11747,3 1171141,4174,77s< 714 ,10.7 7,1'74 77 77 I7.17 07-701 7,7•01777771'74 i .:,.. :,i., 49? ,N1-••.!..,,4,,,,,V,:::,,,, ..5A7 4411 1 Ck,:',72. i: L :1 5.: 49 C rv,7:2',2, 2 77 72 AS r,%, r S.7, 4241 170 rm.-1479, 7 777 4.0774 '47 1777;!107-027 1,77 4 4_44 7.057777 10,5 AM I'(.44"4 4745, 47 40'0 0,47 AM 717 1470 4517;57 777 5427 77 11745. 141577 CS%0.7.1 .1957299-444' ,'7 AM 75 77 1,1.,2,..:i.2 VI 92.9 1.,', ,7,t'.•717,1!77 S51717,77 ;577 . -!- - - - .. , . „ ,. . . . - • . . . . AM PERIOD 4611700-12;(101 DIR 1 DID) Torn), PM P00100 011400-242401 DIR 1 DIR 2 TCRAL 'WI'5471717111 727,207.22-243 1111/17 914022445441:71770 AM 71,74 144 2777,5 747 0 70177 00 474 7.2%.7 47.744 7,4 07547. 02 17:041:5,V AM',..;:',X'.,a1,:',.144( ,..1, 1,154 2771 777777 7514,44711 007 7117 1,7S5 AM 7 7401177774 I 0710 517,•44 47017717747 44 .5174.97777 7295 5245 114 7,1,1-17777 , 1457 4(14 1457 . . ... . . ....._ —. .. . .,. 7. . . , ._. . .. .., . . . . - . • HON COMMUTER MO CID t09:12D15,001 DIP I D1R 2 TOTAI. 0M0.12THR 244-10PERIODS DIRT DIR 2 KITAt N.,,,,P.,...,,,,,:.,:449 24241:3425(9272,45(0.312,',. 5,7177 4 Y., saIl 2940:1,41424 ;DU!mc.43 4T:4771 4441;,7,•44,1.,4q2C7,01(7'.237.771}!71 Or 2,54 4 1,?0, 7707 01E27 774 027!,,2'. 7777 77777 '1,1 f,i,,.€2',":2,10717-7S 04 4.102 1757711 NA!707 4714.10 771177 517770710 70-74,220 00V,,,t 3941 1.1.1.1 21'12,11.11444 5734359(97(9 7.1-4,309015: 5*7444.7.144: '•.7.1.01 5.,2-4 I? 07477-77 7,1,771771.72!.7,', 0477 127 3214 /74 Ithlt-PM DiR I UM a 70104t 11510•iita OW DM.7 IDEAL 111114-PM DIRT D1R 2 TOTAL TIME-EM 11101 0104 '50100 7077.71 10 13 . 14 434572-54*44 TO 111 44.4 ?5544 12 1:', 152 *19 c,341.?.4i*1. 313' 145 1515 2715!".2 T.... .s . 7 35 U.,IS.%F., 91 475 224 75*2 5232 -774 013 L".., ?.?"...12•77 30 449 17,: 055 712-74 549. 7 4 I' 04.Y., 7414S 7! 140 174 77710.1245. 733 771 55 0410-04 CI 1.121.,ES. 117 7147-01 00 44 2 141 2,444-1191.111 '1,1 101 514 . 15 49 T at 3O 217.1 344 74.. 11.114E;-1101.10 1112.. 24 2177 01 50•0-15 , . 4 10 (492.0015 115 251 571 0141-SI 31 117 122 544 4,E15-01 1!_, 171 115 ..714,-0175 S 7 5 744,7-77.75 107 212 192 .}.,11-E,I.V.1 115 ".!'•. 'ie.» 5111-ni ' 7275 5, 304 07 55.171 47 ; 1 13 4' 2351-52.12 152 1541 575 0.:,! -C:74; 15.2 555 7-45 :I42,1-.7.,.,,..5 ').; ';',-.:. 142 SI+1. •(COD 5 2 5, 101 45.0344 707 0775 730 170 45.14 74 7.71 371 514 5540-174 77 77 51 . 5,229-(7517. ! 1 • 7 (411,1-4715 '27 214! 411: (5,2-3-57.43. 142 171 754 9215-14,'$ 27 71 104 110 112•00.77 10 57 77-0470 19- 1E11; 212 11 1.5.11:1 1.il 11.1 214. .711 Ii"-M.:in 3,1. 0 IV 5590'19.45 D 1 1.1: 17434-GS 40 71 177 245 05 34-12:1,1 154 13e ?544 5494.5745 75. 71 147 !07 411.112,7, e. 4: 4,:9 954: 55 ,,,,.,: 41. r..5,.5.7700 64 177.5 275 2442122-22 41 47 5355 71715 7 7 17 5401.5,41E 122 1140 191 11.1 211 590-110 1 EE i..1/ EA 3 4 7 07117!,11747! 171 2 146 :441** 01.57-47 30 715 423 191312 03 P 444 72 ?..f. a4 34 4 ci4 01,. , M :4 D 3?C.CV AD R,' '.,.?. 771 43 371-775 47 045 74.4 231 17174-77777 47 40 71 15735. 47 74 S 72 13 1.007-5 1041, "41 t11 1,5; 23:45 4.114 513 145 323 ':.,72..., .17 51 -57 >4 59 '.',.,50.C.:'f'. 7 57 772 3724522457 ,r, 327 213 ,A 1,1 14 t1. 241 155 7445 7047-12 11 77 . 174 17-0.7;2. a 77. 77 1515-4010 142 1.42 237 r...1 111.2125 701 107 0,7 7075-1321, 27 74 577 5.421 1-142 5 51 43 1J95-1545 ,75 421 037 177510.02;45 :32, '34 ..,....5 14132 35 031 45 5-115-45.55 52 212 35 -E725.41 21, 111 ':4 2413 C...*79 013 00 .577 177, -747 '471.71 77 51 ,5 .11 01 05.44:73 27 1140.71 17 17' 1177 46 4,:.-,.•:,;3'.. •.,,,,? '451 2.5* ,•NI•111,, :?, 02 9951 cf.31 5 42 5.7 1:15-7130 112 11211 213 1,..,7S 5.353 15, 177 320 m 77-m 2,2 37 10 s7 0770 1105 .71 *13 71540,747 1277 M. 217 .54453. 5447 131 11.0 242 11 70.717! 47, 70 50 1047-75.01 7.1 115 11777-*44(4, 1;77 3441 573 171 41-7149 154 175 114'.'4355 45 .E. n . . h‘hypdc.07 8080/ordsVp=101 8.602450064167 ri..NaRP:P8 COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:39•887 1.9 i!2 • , . . - , . — . • . • 10i2,3/20233 35 NI,n,te R,4port '• •I' State of Hawaii,Department of Transport afion,Hi9hways Division RunDate: •••••' i S Minute Volume Report Site to:I, 445534 44 Tow.:3473/7 DIR 1:•MI DIR 2: 729 69:14 0101:PP:::,0 Functinnat[Imp,1•::::-:`:,989 E:1c:A Count Typo:21945 Counter Type:142 Route Na:1-115 locutien: DATE:20-417-40 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-00:001 0101 DM 2 TOTEM PM COMMUICR PERIOD 415:00•14.00: OIR I 0402 T01/4 9. 72,9:129412127 ,:e.31-RE1V3'-A 33,34 3971 3e27<,,.:1:10, 575,,7253.A.71 34.1'51535 475 41445 4.99 40!,.',',97297 Ill.170,3!7.5 3995.WI 411 44.178 :3:2 :11 7153-94/449-75 34 - 947 73/ 4 433 811 (1297299.12: 311 PM 3301-24251 534 AM /543, 5904 93,-74734 23,39 17,,, 21.0 ,,,ii ,',4,.453/4 35177 1174334 1305 351 %91<38 5549 5415'3 4,3 197 A34 91 37,03 44 AM 431'7113 84891WE 43 341,31130 21,1 .23 2,.,1::2 222 222 ,29-112,:.:; ‘,2,,„':1 43! 1 353 554 3747114-71 797404.84 3'41 AM PERIOD 100:00-12:60) DIR 1 04R 2 IOTA:, PM PERM 112:00441001• 0404 OIR 2 , TOTAL • --0•1:::313. 13:324;PIEW 1-21':•LRRII•OEINAI 10443 AV-3344(144 TA18 :9794:5, 93:30 1310'PEAK 718 7/M1 5.537:4 94 24745.1 810-31131 4181315.10.44, 434 '152 9,379 274 154<1.411/359'A.4 405 5/7 1,0.,5 All 0 5.5.91794994! 319 975-9 9/01130095, I:, AM 78121 543 /1 7 113. 1310-13-75. ;35.a 1:413 IN% s . . NOR COMMUTER PER10010100-10:00/ DIA 1 D1R 2 TOTAI. 6•HR.02•1175 04.-.HR PERIODS MR 3 D102 TOTAL 29,2 921423135'1-4< AMP,34.334351 40.1910.15 215 5594 2033 3313 (LAC 145 15171 131 45 4,04.151.74 AV 95-719 3074 775 953554 5334 5455 -(1215 7 2731 711 1,32451431 97, 4.9131 i•-•:•• ,..,••.• ,in,•.-..D,:y.•,,,-,e/x, 4323 5-174 191' 2598311118:7743 174 7141.18 91.333534 92 V.,-;,2,.,7,. 3 , ,111 '5545 5(448 443 r9,49 5344514 054:12.4 91(5 9.4:919:4133 94-5914r i1:91,101,"41559-14 149, 5529 '9194 1919495.2199'25:M( 713 547 52% 59113 32.12 985,. . . T1704.-AM 0101 0102 IDTAI TIME•AM 0100 EISA TOTAL TIME-PM 0101 011 3) T3/131 TAME-PM DR/ 0400 TOTAL 43035.:812, .4 21 32 837.5-3318 54 175 •17933•45 1,17 14 454 2453,79331 5 133 915 7,45 43915,17472 E. 99 11 1,115,9631, 19 11: 1,10. 1)13 1.1•50 70" 931 28.9 94,39-".99 35, :115 . 111,5 2121 1910•12 45 III 5 15 5475 03145 35 :2.: 211 +.25,2,1541 "4,1 9.193 113 9950•199411 151 (25' 159 9945'Sill :I II 35 9445-9,5991 E4 515 214 12.43-41 0,5 294. 122 2151 12243-91:24 111 441 533 5103'411 15 5 3 ¶5 0703 0.7 12 51 323 323 51 40'54 911 113 120 209 913•27 9E ./33 /-, "1,5 01 14-019:51 IT 3 91. 2112-2159 :23 744 053 71 15-CA 35 141 151 .22 .37 13 451 755 51 74 151 37331.91.1 33 7 4 1 333 .3332 "99 111 429 94 19.9141 "19 159 295 2E999-9945 92 75 15; 0147'rr,..rk , , 2742,22139 134 E551I 3E10 9"45,52 14 949 3749 (700 35 571 '45 WO-0543 t 2 , 52(2'.•OM 499 .353 311 02.45-05./3 194 919 9.599 945.311 53 19 920 99 11.-51919 ", 3 5399•37..i-io 6,,i. , 13 ',,,,,,, c'l 15.52 441 145 1314 591 591?-75311 15 38 III 5230-32-13. 5 4 31 11353 oa-rf. 73 182 283 c322,132.43 4,0 '152 345 121511-c.22 45 73, 55 1293 99 45-99:,11, 0 • 15 5145.39049 11 1.50 9-03 92 40•99091 :91 :09 1191 111194E-934215 99 Al 149 13 99-99,15 ' ' 737117 3414 1.7., ¶.../.., '151 *2,...2.:-.7:315 153, '41 221 1:065-,:q°.!: 50 ..,i 315 9:,15•'...€'..?:, 7 3 , „ 1215 4203 35 192 215 9511E•1'211- •-• 157 128 355 5491 29515 31 21 455 0318 932 44 1 . 15 2229-5448 31.1 145 31,... 011230/11 105 133 105 5115-32011 50 79 114 03 41.34 9E9 , ,.j. 20 )1-29-'I'22 945 410 171 53 42 3.335 731, 143 500 55940 131 fp:. 44 44 51 44 4,.34 15 4 3 07 19392'IA 15 133 145 475 1452 1821 410 454 704 ..,253,5313 43 10 !311 3,3-7,9793 1 5: 41 35.13-1453 1114 753 039:2.3133 3-10 11,!.. 385 105-q'V,i.r: 73 44 41 5033---11 33 12 42 1231- 31941 ,1 1213 1111 •94 19-E5,45 Z. 545 7E4 :3:3.331. 105 3,,3.0590 21 1" 9,9 1,211 '1(13: 152 131 25.1 24-72'95/7< 243 114 1-45 '545,(:1:3 24 21 ,:h,.,'Ai.24'a 21 55 41 1144 947 15 135 1.12 113 3313•749740 222 .,..: V,'-1 SI 011-II 13 37 53 33 22-11, (555 57 42 21 11,..f-1152 5.5 1.2,2 351 91111 2535 134 123 .3474 11 91,114,1 55 ?, 73 (5.52 1312 411. 99 112 :110,9145 197 121 241 91191215:9-13 10: 121 11597 '"99 1145 25 .1 42 935 45'(/711' 411 17 134 9133-7495 113. Q4 345 3445,•3,107 925 23,4 11 437 la Y, 7,5 r: 21 hv9ypdc07 8080/ordePp=101”8.802/150C9641576:1NaRRPS COUNT_NUM8ER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:39867 20 1/2 • . . . , . • . • 1 ' I • , . , 1 , Appendix B Intersection Operations Analysis — Synchro Worksheets Adjusted Year 2020 Peak Hour Worksheets HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 1111312020 Intersection int Delay.siveh 3,2 Movement EBL EBT EBR VVOL t'BT 4'VBR NOL NOT NOR SBL SOT SBR Lane Configurations .'h a c, Traffic Vol,`vehih 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Future Vol, veh/h 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length , - - 150 - - - - - - - - i Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92- 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 49 528 5. 11 186 92 22 33 -60 3 5 33 Conflicting Flow All 278 0 0 533 0 0 902 929 531 929 885 232 Stage 1 - . 629-"°629 254 254 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 273 300 - 675 631 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 7 1 6.52 6.22. 7.12 6.52., 6.22` Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical HdwyStg,2. =° 16.12 .5.52 6.12 5.52:. Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pat Gap-1 Maneuver 1285. - - 1035 - - - .`259` '268 548 ° :248' .284 807 Stagel 470 475 - 750 697 - Stage 2... , - 733 666 441`,.474 Platoon blocked,% - - - - Mew Cap-i Maneuver- 1285° 1035 °`;236 " 255: "548 192 270 "' 607" Mov Cap-2 fvlaneuver 236 255 192 270 - Stage Stage 2 - - - - - - 690 659 - 353 456 - -y.a �me a HCMf,Control Delay,s .:'0.7 p,3 ; 20.4 12.3 HCM LOS C B f3T, 'VVBR SBL'n1 Capacity(vehih) 347 1285 1035 - 533 HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.329 0.038 - - 0.011 - - 0.077 HCM Control Delay(s) 20.4 7:9 - - 8.5 - - 12.3 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - B HCM 95th%the Q(veh) 1.4 0.1 - - 0 - 0,3 Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street 8:Mohouli Street 11(13/2020 Intersection int Delay.siveh 3.2 Movement EEL EST EBR WEL WET *ER NBL NET HER SEL SET SEE Lane Configurations t) 4. Traffic Vol,vehlh 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Future Vol.veh/h 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None -. - None Storage Length '150 - - 150 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - •0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 49 528 5 11 186 92 22 33 60 3 5 33 Major/Minor Majorl Majo2, ° „Wort Minor2- Conflicting Flow All 278 0 0 533 0 0 902 929 531 929 885 232 Stage 1 - - - - 629 629 - 254 254 - Stage 2 - - - 273 300 - 675 631 Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5,52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1285 - - 1035 - - 259 268 548 248 284 807 Stage 1 - - - - - - 470 475 - 750 697 Stage 2 - - - - 733. 666 - 444 474 - Platoon blocked,% - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1285 - - 1035 - 236 255 548 192 270 807 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 236 255 - 192 270 - Stage 1 - 452 457 - 722 689 - Stage 2 •- - - - - 690 659 - 353 456 - Approach ° WB WE SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 0,3 20.4 12.3 HCfv1 LOS minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnI EEL EDT EBR „W131._ 'NET WBR SBLnl. Capacity(Yellin) 347 1285 - - 1035 - - 533 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.329 0.038 - - 0.011 - - 0.077 HCM Control Delay(s) 20.4 7.9 - - 8.5 - - 12.3 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - B HCM 95th%tile()(ven) 1.4 0.1 - 0 - - 0.3 Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11113/2020 Movement EAL EBT EAR WEIL WAT WAR NAL NAT • NAR SAL SAT SAP Lane Configurations 'I r r 14. Traffic Volume(vell/h) 16 366 191 115 139 180 144 610 405 145 170 8 Future Volume(vehlh) 16 366 191 115 139 160 144 610 405 145 170 8 Initial 0(OW,veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehihfin 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 17 398 208 125 151 196 157 663 440 158 185 9 Peak Hour Factor 092 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 , 0.92- 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 .2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 109 530 449 252 205 266 586 748 634 225 690 34 Arrive On Green 0,06 0,28 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 739 959 1781 1870 1585 1781 1769 - 86 Grp Volurne(v),veh/h 17 398 208 125 0 347 157 663 440 158 0 194 Grp Sat now(s),vehinfin 1781 ' 1870 1585 1781 0 'i698 1781 1870 - 1585 1781 0 '1855 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.8 17.4 9.7 4.5 0.0 16.7 4.7 29.7 20.8 4,8 0.0 6.4 Cycle Clear(g_lo),s 6_6 174 9.7 4.5 6.6 - 1617 4.7 29.7' 20.8 4.8 0.0 8.4 • Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp 0ap(c),vehlh 109 530 440 252 0 472 586 748, 634 225 0 723 V/C Ratio(X) 0.16 0.75 0.46 0.50 up 0,74 0.27 0.89 0.69 0.70 0.00 0.27 Avail-baP(c_a);vehill 109 830 449 252 1 0 472 586 748 634 225 0 723 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 UPstreani,Fliter(1) 1.00"- .00 1.60 1.00 „9:ob ' 1.0o 'tooY too too:- 0.00 : 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 40.1 29.4 26.6 23A 0.0 29.5 14.6 25.1 22.4 21.0 0.0 18.7 IntrDeiay"(d2) ,siveh 3.0 ° 94 • 34: 9.8. ' 111, "14.6: - 612 16.8 • 0.6 0.9 Initial 0 Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0.0 0,0 %Ile Baok0f0(50%),Vehltri OA. 86 '-' 3.9 22 ' 0.9 76 19, 148- 8,1 28 00 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),siveh 43 1 38.8 36;030 2 00 39 3 15,7 397 286, '37:8 ' 0.0, 19.6 Lnerp LOS D 0 C C AD . 13 ID CD A ApproachVol,venth 823 472 "1263 - 352 Approach Delay,s/veh 36.0 36.9 32,8 27.8 Approach'LOS _ D - 0 - ycY;i: Phs Duration 40.5 6:5 30.0 1019, 3916 10.0 - Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 5.5 36.0 -25.5 ' 6.4 '35.1: 5.5 25.0: Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.8 31.7 6.5 19.4 6.7 8.4 2.8 18.7 Green Ext Time(p_c);'s 0:0 2.3 0.0. 1.5 00 1.0 0.0 to .°` HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.6 HCM 6th LOS Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TVVSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 11/13/2020 Intersection Int Delay.slveh 2,6 Movement EBL EST E8R WBL WET 'MIR NOL NOT NOR SBL SOT SEP Lane Configurations ,c-r› Traffic Vol,vehih 20 292 5 50 407 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Future Vol,vehlh 20 292 5 50 407 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Conflicting Peds,If/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 - - 159 - - - - - - - Veli in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - . 0 - Grade.% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 , 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvrnt Flow 22 317 5 54 442 5 4 11 27 2 22 60 Conflicting Flow All 447 0 0 322 0 0 958 919 320 936 919 445 Stage 1 - - - 364 '364 - 553 553 Stage 2 - - - - - - 594 555 - 383 366 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6:22' - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1113 - 1238 - 237 271 721 245 271 613 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 655 624 - 517 514 - Stage 2 - 491 513 640 " 623- - Platoon blocked. % - - , - - Mov CaP-1 Maneuver 1113 " 1238 - - 191 254 721 247 •254 513 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 191 254 - 217 254 - Stage 1 - - 642 612 - 507 491 —1 -Stage 2 - - - - - - 405 490 - 593 611 - Aporcach ED WD . NO SO 7 HCM Control Delay,s C. 0.9 14.0 15.3 HCM LOS Minor Lena!Ma jo Mvmz NI3Ln1 EBL EDT 013R WET WOR S[3Lnl Capaciiy veh/h) 411 1113 - - 1238 - - 433 HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.103 0.02 - - 0.044 - - 0.193 HCM Control Delay(s) 14.8 8.3 - - 8 - - 15.3 HCPvl Lane LOS B A - - A - - C HCM 95th%file Q(veh) 0.3 0. - - 0.1 - - 0.7 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 11/1312020 Intersection int Delay,siveh 1,1 Movernent EBL ERT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations '11 trYir Traffic Vol,vehih 4 315 485 40 48 4 Future Vol,vehit 4 315 485 40 48 4 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 "0 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 9292 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 342 527 43 52 LI Conflicting Flow All' 570 0 - 0 877 527 Stage 1 527 Stage 2 - - - 350 - Critical Hdvvy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3,318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1002 319 551 Stage 1 - - - - 592 Stage 2 713- - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1Maneuver' 1002 318 551 Moy Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 318 - „ Stage-1'., 590 ' Stage 2 - - - - 713 - Approach ES iB. SB HCM Control Delay,S '61 ; - 0 18 HCM LOS Capacity(vehlh) 1002 — - - 318 551, HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - - 0.164 0.008 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.6 - - 18.5 11.6 HCM Lane LOS A - - - C B HCM 95th iMle Q(veh) 0 - - 0.6 0 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/13/2020 I '4- k` 44\ Movement EBL EBT FOR •WBL WET WB R NOL NBT NOR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'I it ri Pr 13. Traffic Volume(vehih) 10 174 179 300 333 110 180 280 175 130 490 12 Future Volume(veh/h) 10 174 179 300 333 110 180 280 175 130 490 12 initial 0(Qh). ve.1-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/111 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehth 11 189 195 326 362 120 196 304 190 141 533 13 Peak Flour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92; 0.92 0.92 ' 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 - 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehfh 109 530 449 382 373 124 325 748 • 634 445 709 17 Arrive On Green 0.06 028 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow,vehih 1781 " 1870 1585 - 1781 1344 446 1781 1870 - '1585 1781 '1818 44 Grp Voiume(v), vehih 11 189 195 326 0 482 196 304 190 141 0 546 Grp Sat Flow(s),ven/b)in 1781- 1870' 1585 -1781 0 1,790 1781 - 1870 1585 1781 - 0 1862 Q Seive(g_s),s 0.5 7.3 9.0 5.0 0.0 24.0 6.0 10.5 7.4 4.2 0 0 22.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c);s '0.5' 7.3 9:0- 5.0 " 0.0 '24:0 6.0 10:5 7.4 4.2 '0.0 22.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh'h - 109 530 449 382 0 497 325 748 634 445 0 726 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.36 0.43 0,85 0,00 0.97 0.60 0.41 0,30 0.32 0.00 0.75 AVail-Cap(d_4,vehlh 109 530 - 449 :382 "0 497 " 325 748 634 445 0 726 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 QPStreerit,.Filier(4. '1;00 100 L00 I.00 0.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 too 1.00 0.00 1:03 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 39.9 25.7 ,26,4 31.0 0.0 32.1 18.4 19.3 18.4 15.3 0.0 23.7 incr:Deley:-(C12),.s/Veh 1.9 1.9 3.0 21.0 0.0; 314 8,12 : 1.6 1.2" 1.9 0:0 7.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Beck01Q,(50%),VehIln 0:3 ' '3.3' . ''3.6 8:5 0.0 "' 14.2 2;9' 4 5 , '2.7 1.6 , 0.0 10.4 Unsig. Movement Delay,siveh LnGrPi De!ay(d,sIveh 41.8 27.6 29.4 P51.9 0.0 '6:5;5 26.5 21.0' "" 19:6 17.2' LnGrp LOS 0 C CD A F CC B 13 A C Approach Vol,vehih • 690 687 Approach Delay,s/veh 28.9 60;1 22.2 28.0 Approach LOS - C E C Phs QttratiOn'(G4-Y-4-RP),s 10.0 46,6- 9.5 (j.c 2 10:9, Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 5.5 36.0 5.0 25.5 6.4 35.1 5.5 25.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_ct11),s 6.2 12.5 7.0 11.0 8.0 24.8 2.5 26.0 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 2.2 0.0 1.3 6:0 0.0 6:0 HOM 6th CV!Delay 36.6 HCM 6th LOS Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Year 2025 Peak Hour Background without Project HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 11/13/2020 • Intersection int Delay.siveh 3.3 Movement EBL EDT EBR WBL \NET WER NEL NET HER SEL SET SER Lane Configurations ) AP), I> 4> Traffic Vol,veht 45 491 5 10 172 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Future Vol.veh!h 45 491 5 10 172 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peds,#Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,1 - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade.% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 49 534 5 11 187 92 22 33 60 3 5 :33 Conflicting Flow All 279 0 0 539 0 0 909 936 537 936 892 233 Stage 1 - - 635 635 - 255 255 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 274 301 - 681 637 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdm Stg 1 - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - r 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2,218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot dap-1 Maneuver 1284 - - 1029 256 265 544 245 281 806 Stage 1 - 467 472 749 696 , „- - - - - " - Stage 2 - 732 665 - 440 471 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - • Mov Cap-tMeneuver '1284 1029 - 233 • 252 544 189 267 806 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 233 252 - 189 267 - Stage - - - 440 454 , - 688 - Stage 2 - - - - - 689 658 - 350 453 - HCM COntr61 Delay,a 0.7 •0.320.6 12.4 HCM LOS rvftor Lane/Major Mvmt NOLnI EEL EDT EBR Ak: WET WED SE3LnI Capacity(veh/h) 343 1284 - - 1029 - - 529 HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.333 0.038 - - 0.011 - - 0.078 HCM Control Delay(a) - 20.6 7.9 - - 8.5 - - 12.4 HCM Lane LOS .0 A - - A - - B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.4 0.1 , - 0 0.3 2025 Background AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 11113/2020 Intersection int Delay.siveh 1,1 Movement EBL EDT WBT WBR SBL SOP Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,vehlh 14 535 257 80 43 10 Future Vol. vehTh 14 535 257 80 43 10 Conflicting Peds,///hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade.% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mornt Flow 15 582 279 87 47 11 Major/Minor: , .41ajorl, Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 366 0 - 0 891 279 Stage 1 - - 279 - Stage 2 - - - - 612 - Critical Hdwy 4,12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1193 - - - 313 760 Stage 1 - - - 768 - Stage 2 * - , " - 541 - Platoon blocked,°,(ci MOo Cap-1 Maneuver 1193 - - 309 760 Moo Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 309 Stage 1 - - - - 758 Stage 2 - - - - 541 - Approach*, lEB ' WB SB: HCM Control Delay,-s 0.2 0 17 HCM LOS MinOr4LaneiMaloi,VoMiL: .;. CDL EDT WBT WBR SBLnI S8L2 Capacity(veh/h) 1193 - - 309 760 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - - 0.151 0.014 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.1 - - - 18.7 9.8 HCM Lane LOS A - - - C A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.5 0 2025 Background AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11113/2020 J _ Movement EBL EBT ,EBR WBL WET WOR NBL NBT NBR SBL SET SBR Lane Configurations li + fl '1 i+ ) t fc I 14 Traffic Volume(vehlh) 17 367 194 115 147 180 172 610 405 145 170 18. Future Volume(veh/h) 17 367 ' 194 115 . 147 180 172 610 405 145 170 18 Initial 0(Oh),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i Fed-Bike Adi(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flovi/,.Rate,vehih 18 399 211 125 160196 187 663 440 158 185 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92, ' 0.92 0.92 .0.92 .': 0.92 0.92 0-.92. -0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,%. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h" ' 109 530 449 251 212 260 ' 581 748' 634 - 225 627 68 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.08 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.38 0.38 Sat Flovir,vehin . 1781_ .1870 1685: 1781 - 765 937 1781 '. 1870 1565 1781 1659 179 Grp Volume(v),vehth 18 399 211 125 0' 356 187 663 440 158 , 0 205 Grp Sat'Flow(S),veniniln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1702 1781 . 1870 1585 1781' 0 1838 0 Serve(g_s),s 0.9 17.5 9.9 4.5 0.0 17.2 5.7 29.7 20.8 .4,9 0.0 7.0 Cycle CiClear(g_c),'s. 0.9 - 175 '9.9 •4.5.' 0.0' 17.'2, 5.7. - '29.7 - - 20.8 -4.9 - 0.0 ° 7.0 Prop in Lane '1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00' 1.00 1.00 0.10 ' Lane Grp Cap(c),vehlh 109 530 '449 251 0 .473 581, . -748 .' 634 ' '225 0 694 V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.75 0.47 0.50 0.00 0.75 0.32 0.89 0.69 0.70 0.00 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a),.vehin. 109 530 - -449 ' • 251 ' • 0 473 - 581 ' '748 '634 225 0 694 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 UptreaM.Filter(1)" ,'-'' ' ' - ' 1,00 ' :11.06 1:66' ' 1:100,1:', ',r,i'Xi0 '' 1‘,00 ' '''1,.db ,- ‘-1,00, - . 1:00 ' 1..06- 0.00. 1:00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 40.1 29.4 26,7 23.4 0.0 29.7 14.9 25.1 22.4 21.2 0.0 19.6 IncrDelaY(ci2).,siveh . 31:2., 0" 9.5 ' 35-: , '''6,9. "' -•?.00 10.8- 18. :, "14'..6 -. 6.2' - 16.8, - 090 " 11 Initial 0 Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Molle Back0f0(50%),vehiln' . ,0.5 .87 3,:9'' ., ' 2.2. ' '0.9 ' ;-7,9 ' ."2.314.;.8". -. 8.1 2,9- ' 0.0 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrPDelay(d),s/Veli. 1 .43.3, . 36:9.2' . .86: :' , ab•„..3..'' 0.0. r 40,3 ".".16.'..4,:' .3a7• "1286 38.0',- • 0.0 ,20.7 LnGrp LoS D 0 C C A 0 B D C D A C ApproaCh Vol,veh/h " '620 ' - , " '-2161' ' ' " '1290' ' " ' 363 Approach Delay,s/veh 36.1 37.7 32.5 28.2 . 0 , Approaati LOS - .' D' . ' D . 1','-::::;.,!,.,-',.272'.':.,.:4:: .',..::-',,.:-...!".14.'4'0'?7,.,",";5100....60J,T1."-L-1": 4-,",':,. 8".':13'I.1.::,";,:',";r,•.,:""-7.7,";.!:7.-!.: Phs Diiration(3:1-Y4-F-10,s 10.0 40..57. 9.5 r 50.0 121 '38.5 '10,0 ' -"20' •' ' Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Grnax),s 5.5 36.0 5.0' 25.5 ' '7.5' 34.0 '5:5 ' 25.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 6.9 31.7 6.5 19.5 7.7 9.0 2.9 19.2 Green Ext Time(p_c),a 0.0 2:3 0.0 1:5' 110 ' 1.0 0.0 1.0' iiiiiiia'Pii.411.iiiii:y27.7.7 ;,,7. HCM 6th Cid Delay 33.7 ' HCM 6th LOS C 2025 Background AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report 1 Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 1111312020 Intersection Int Delay;siveh 2.6 Movement • EBL EDT EBR VVBL WBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations vi Traffic Vol,veht 20 295 5 50 412 5 . 4 10 ' 25 2 20 55 Future Vol.vehlh 20 295 5 50 412 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Conflicting Reds,if/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 . - ' 0 - 0 Grade,% - - 0 - - 0 - • Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 321 5 54 448 - 5 4 11 27 2 22 60 Conflicting Flow All 453 0 0 326 0 0 968 929 324 946 929 451 Stage 1 - 368 '':368 559 559 Stage 2 - - - - - - 600 561 - 387 370 - Critical Hdwy ' 4.12 " - 4.12 - ° 7.12 - 6.52 9.22 7:12 . 6.52 • 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.12 5.52 • 6.12 5:52"'"" Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2,218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.918 3318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1108 1234 233;'''268 717 241 '11268 :908 • Stage 1 - - - - - 652 ,,•621_ r. 513 511 - Stage2•`• 2"- Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 ManeUver:,:1108 1234 '1E0 251 717 : '214 251 608 , Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 187 251 - 214 251 Stage 1, 609- A99 :Stage 2 - - - - - - 402 488 - 590 608 - HCM Control Delay,s 0.5 ° '0:9'; 14.9 15.4 HCMI_OS Capacity(Veh/h) 406 1108 - 1234 " - 429 HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.104 0.02 - - 0.044 - 0.195 HCM Control Delay(s) 14.9 8.3' - 8.1 - 2 154 HCM Lane LOS B A - A - - C HCM 95th 'dile quern' 0.3 0.1 - 0.1 - - 0.7 2025 Background.PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9. Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 11/1312020 Intersection Int Delay.siveh 2,3 Movement EBL ELT V1/ET VVER SBL SBR Lane Configurations ' ' Traffic Vol,veh!h 7 315 485 59 94 9 Future Vol,vehih 7 315 485 59 94 9 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 0 Grade.% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flown - 8 342 527 64 102 10 Conflicting Flow All 591 0 - 0 885 527 Stage 1 527, Stage 2 - - - - 358 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 :` - - • - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy St n2 -5.42 g - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver '985 - 315 551 Stage 1 - - - 592 - 'Stage 2 .. . 707.�. - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver'' `985, . - " " = - 312 . .551 iviov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 312 - • Stage 1,u .r . _ 5$7 Stage 2 ° - - - - 707 - Approach :,k EBS ,. 148 W o. ;13 :o x,p HCM Control'Delay,s 0.2 "0 21.2 HCM LOS C M nor."Lar�e71V3ajor,Mvmt," :EBL DT ,WBTY 18 BLn1, t Ln2 s. ., Capacity(vehih) ` 985 - - - 312 ,551 HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.008 t - - - 0.327 0.018 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.7 - - 22.1 11.7 HCM Lane LOS A - - - C B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 1.4 0.1 • 2025 Background PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11113/2020 J _0' -'sif C il- ik- 41\ t /* \°` d ) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL Wail WBR NBL NOT NOR SBL SOT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vent) 20 182 207 300 338 110 191 280 175 130 490 15 Future Volume(vehlh) 20 182 207 300 338 110 191 280 175 130 490 15. Initial 0(Ob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ', 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(kpbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870, 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/11 22 198 225 326 367 120 208 304 190 141 533 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 -0.92, 0:92, 0.92 0.92 0.92 ' 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h , 109 530 449 428' 418 137 ' 302 663 562 420 584 18 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat How,vehin 1781 " 1870 1585 1781, 1350 441 1781 1670 1585 1781 1806 54 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 22 198 225 326 0 487 208 304 190 141 0 549 Grp Sat Flow(s),VehlhAn 1781 i80 1585 1781 0 ' 1791 1781 , -1870 '1585 1781 0 1861 0 Serve(g_s),s 1.1 7.6 10.7 7.9 0.0 23.2 6.8, 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 25.5 Cycle 0 Ctear(g_c),s ' 1.1 .7.6 '10.7 ' -7.9 0.0 -23.2 .68 113 7.9' ' 4.7 ' 0,0 25:5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 Lane Grp Cap(c),vellh 109 • 530 449 428' 0 ' 555 302" 663 562 420 0 602 V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.37 0.50 0.76 0.00 0.88 0.69 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.91 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/ll 109 ' 530 , 449' 428 0 555 302 " 883 562 420 0 602 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Upstream'Filter(1) ' 100 -'.'1.00 l. 1.00' ' 1.00 0:00 ' '1.00 1.00 ''" .1.00' " 1.00 '" t00."' "10.00 ''' 1,00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 40.2 25.8 26.9 25.7 0.0 29.4 20.9 22.4 21.3 18.2 0.0 29.2 1p6r,Delay(d2);siveh 4.1 ' .20 ll -4.0 121 00 .17.6 " 12'..1. .' 23 '1;6- ' 2.2 " 0.0 20.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BacktifQ(50%),vefilln ' .0.6 " '.3:5 4,3 ° 3.7 l 0.0 11:9 '' -3:5 5.0' 10 2.0 9.0 13.8 Unsig. Movement Delay,siveh LnGrp Delay(d),i/Veli • ' 44:3 ' 279 ' 30.9. '''-379 -0.0 -47,0' ' '33.0-'',,243 22.9 '204 ' 0,0 ' 49.8 LnGrp LOS 0 'C C 0 A D C C C C A ,D „ .... . . Approach Vol,veh./IT ' . 445 l ' ' '813- ) 702, ' 8' 0' Approach Delay,s/veh 39.2 43.3 26.7 43.7 APprOach LOS ' C ' , D ' C . ' ' 0 ' Titifei.,;,,,kitiorid,di:Phii-,:f:;<,7,i1 , ,,-',, .?; . . ,..-;;:425:'',,,10Zi-,,,3'6;,”:4,;',::°7l..:'',0, 'lllZ- ';;,-..;7;l7,.. ";.;;;;;..::,''''';;''2,tll;;:-.',; Phls Duration(G404Rc);S' ' 11.2 ' '-6.41 12,4' ' -30.0-"' 14,0 ' 33.6 '-ito 32A / Change Period(Y+Rc).s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 / Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 8.7 31.9 . 7.9 '25.5. 9.5 29.1. 55 .27.9 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.7 13.3 9.9 12.7 8.8 27.5 3,1 25.2 Green Ext Time(p_c)',s 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.4 06 0.5 0.0' 08 iiii6is6.cii6iiiiiii7riiiii':47::::7.2:::,77,71':27:77'11,",:7T2.:::::;;,:77.7: : :7,:'1 HCM 6th Otrl Delay 36.8 HCM 6th LOS 0 2025 Background PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Year 2025 Peak Hour with Project HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street . 11/13/2020 Intersection Int Day, �Delay;.s/veh 3,3 Movement EBL EBT EAR WBL WBT WBR NAL NOT NOR SBL SOT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ Traffic Vol,veh/h 45 493 5 10 179 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Future Vol,vehih 45 493 5 10 179 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0" 0.. - 0 (-Grade.% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 49 536 5 11 195 92 22 33 60 3 5 33 1aor/ inor :. . �Malor lalor2 �r;„t. inor1 .., i. .. Mirot2'�. Conflicting Flow All 287 0 0 541 0 0 919 946 539 946 902 241 Stage 1 - . „ 631 637 263 263 Stage 2 - - - - - - 282 309 - 683 639 - Critical,Hdwy 4.12% - 4.12 - ,7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2. - 6.12 5.52. - 6.12<< 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy. 2.218 - - 2.218 - 3.518 '4.018 3,318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1275 . - 1028 °252' 262 '542 241- 277 798 Stagel - - - - - -465 471 742 691 - Stage 2 ":725 " ' .660 439'; 470". �. Platoon blocked,% - - - - Miov Gap-1 Maneuver '1275 1028` = `'''"-229' 249 542 . 186'— 263` 1981 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 229 249. - 186 263 - Stage'1°� , y '447 453 - 714' 683.,9, Stage 2 - - - - - 682 653 - 349 452 ' - HCfvl Control'Delay,'a 0.7-, 0.3 '• 20.9 12.5:" 1-1CM LOS C B - _ m Capacity{veh/h) • 339' 1275 - - 1028 - 522 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.337 0.038 - - 0.011 - - 0.079 HCM Control Delay(a) 20.9 7.9 - - 8.5 - - 12.5 RCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - B HCM 95th%tile O(veh) 1.4 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.3 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 • HCM 6th TWSC 11: Mohouli Street & RI/R0 Driveway 11/13+2020 Intersection Int Delay. s/veh 0,1 Movement EBL EDT WBT WED SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,vehih 0 551 267 8 0 7 Future Vol, veh%h 0 551 267 8 0 7 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - 150 - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.'% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 599 290 9 0 8 lajorIMinor Major1 Major2 M nor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 - 290 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - - 0 749 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 749 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WE SB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 9.9 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major`MvmtEDT WET �1BR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) - - - 749 HCN1 Lane VIC Ratio - - - 0.01 HCM Control Delay(s) - - - 9.9 HCM Lane LOS - - - A HCM 95th%tile°(veh) - - - 0 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 • HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 11113/2020 InterseCtion Int Delay.0/eh 1.8 Movement EBL EDT lAIBT WOR SBL SBR Lane Configurations '1 Traffic Vol,veht 16 535 265 80 74 10 • Future Vol, vehlh 16 535 265 80 74 10 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 Veil in Median Storage,# 0 : 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mymt Flow 17 582 288 87 80 11 Conflicting Flow All 375 0 - 0 904 288 Stage 1 Stage 2 - - - - 616 - Critical Hdwy ' 4,12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.42 - critical,Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pd!Cap-i Maneuver 1183 307 751 • Stage 1 - - - - 761 - 'Stage ' - „ - 539. Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-i Maneu'Ver 1183 - 303 751 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 303 Stage 1 - 750 Stage 2 - - - - 539 - Approach . E13 WB Sf3 HCM.Confrol Delay,s 0.2 0 19.8- — Hal LOS Capacity(vehih) 1183 - - 308 751 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 - - - 0.265 0.014 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.1 - - - 21.1 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A - - - C A HCM 95th%tile O(veh) 0 - - 1 0 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report • Page 1 • HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 f -''/' I- **--- k"' 4\ Movement EBL EBT FOR WOL \PIOT ,,A,/OR NOL NOT NOR SOL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ci . / Traffic Volume(vehM) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 Future Volume(vehih) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 Initial 0(0b) yell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fed-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlh/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 24 203 241 326 380 120 229 304 190 141 533 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 s 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 109 ' 530 449 422 422 133 296 663 562 420 573 27 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1363 430 1781 1870 1585 1781 1772 83 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 24 203 241 326 0) 500 229 304 190 141 0 558 G rp S a1 F iow(s),vehlivIn 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1793 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1855 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.2 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24.0 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.2 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24.0 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26:2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 109 530 449 422 0 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.38 0.54 0.77 0.00 0.90 0.77 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.93 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 109 530 449 422 0 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1,00 1.00' 1.00 1.00 000 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 40.2 25.9 27.3 25.9 0.0 29.7 21.3 22.4 21.3 18.2 0,0 29.5 lncr Delay(d2),siveh ' 4.6 2:1 4.5 ' 12,9 0.0 20.1 17:8' ' .2, . ' "1:6 2.2 0,0 23:0 initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back0fQ(50°/0),vehila 0.6 3.6 4.6 3.8 0,0 -12.6 4.2 5.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 14.5 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh , LriGrP Delay(d),s/veh 44.8 . 28:0 31.8 38.8 00 49.8 -39,1 24.7 22.9 20.4 0,0 52.5 LnGrp LOS D C C 0 A 0 D C C C ,A 0 Approach Vol,veh/h 468 826" 723 699 Approach Delay,s/veh 30.8 45.5 28.8 46.0 Approach LOS ' 'C ' 0 C D irirnar-Assigned Phs ; -, ,-,1: 0;- 2. ,-.3, ., ..„,' 4'', -- 05- 6' - '-', 7. ',. .'‘.8 Phs Duration(G-107-1-Rc),s 11.2 36.4 ' 12 4 '30,0 14.0 33.6 10.0 32-.4 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.7 31.9 7.9 25.5 9.5 , 29.1 5.5 27.9 Max 0 Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.7 13.3 9.9 13.6 9.5 28.2 3.2 26.0 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.6 intersectior0Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.6 HCM 6th LOS D 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 11/13/2020 Intersection Int Delay,siveh 2,6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WEL \NET WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SET; SBR Lane Configurations "P> II 14 Traffic Vol,vehih 20 299 5 50 414 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Future Vol,vehlh 20 299 5 50 414 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Conflicting Peds,#ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length %150 - - 150 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0` "0 0 - Grade;% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92. 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22- 325 5 54 450 5 4 11 27 ' 2 22 60 Conflicting Flow All 455 0 0 330 0 0 974 935 328 952 935 453 Stage 1 - -" - ' 372 `372 561 561 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 602 563 - 391 374 - Critical Hdtivy 4.12' '4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 '6.52 6.22 , Critical Hdwy y Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg°2. '6.12 ; 5.52 - 6.12 5,52 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1106 - 1229' - -1.'231 265- 713 239 265 ' 607 Stage 1 - - - - - - 648 619 512 510 - Stage 2 ° _ 486. '509. - 633 e618 Platoon blocked,% - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver-°1106 � 1229 '185 " 248 -713 .212 248 607 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 185 248 - 212 248 - . Stage a 635- `;607' - -502 488', Stage 2 - - - - - - 400 487 - 536 606 - Approach, . EB,' WEa .SBz `. x HCM Control'Delay,s 0;5., ,0,9 15 15:5. HCM LOS C C MinorLane/Ma)or.Mvrn`t , o. ,?JOLn 1, E L LET...EBR, WBL <,. ET ,WEE SBL l r.. ; Capacity(vehth) 402 1106 1229 - 426 HCM Lane V!C'Ratio 0.105 0.02 - - 0.044 - - 0.196 HCM Control Delay(s) 15 83 - - 8.1 - - 15.5' HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 - 0,1 0.7 • 2025 Total PM Peak Hour Syrichro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 11: Mohouli Street & RI/FRO Driveway 11/13/2020 Intersection int Delay.siveh 0 Movement EBL POT WK. 'NOR SBL SBR Lane Configurations A A 1 1 1 r P Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 326 462 40 0 2 Future Vol, veh/h 0 326 462 40 0 2 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 150 - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% 0 . 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Went Flow 0 354 502 43 0 2 MajorNincir'' '' ,MaiOrl : . Major2 ' -Minor2° Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 - 502 Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - ' - 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - - 0 569 Stage 1 0 - 0 - • • Stage 2 9 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 569 May Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 1 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - - - Approach PB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 11.4 HCM LOS B • Minor LaTie/Malor Mvrnt ' , ' EST,.-WBT WBR 813Ln1 Capacity(veh/h) - - - 569 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.004 11 HCM Control Delay(s) - - 11.4 HCM Lane LOS - B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - - 0 2025 Total PM Peak Hour . , Synchro 11 Report Page 1 lacy 6th TVVSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 11/1312020 Intersection Int Delay.slveh 3.2 Movement EBL OCT kAIBT WBR 'SBL SCR Lane Configurations t rf ff Traffic Vol,veh/h 11 315 525 59 116 11 Future Vol,veh/h 11 315 525 59 116 11 Conflicting Pads,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 - Veh in Median StOrage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade.% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 9292 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvrnt Flow 12 349 571 64 126 12 Maor/Mrnor Majorl Mjor2 Minot2 Conflicting Flow All 635 0 - 0 937 571 Stage 1 - - - 571 Stage 2 - - - - 366 - 'Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 948 - • - 294 520 Stage 1 - - - - 565 - Stage,2 - - - 702 Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 948 - - 290 520 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 290 - Stage 1 - - 558 - Stage 2 - - - - 702 - Approach ' ED ' WB SB HCM"Control belay,s 0.3 —0 25,3 HCM LOS Capacity(veh/h) 948 - - - 290 520 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - - 0.435 0.023 I-ICM Control Delay(s) 8.8 - - - 26.6 12.1 HCM Lane LOS A - - - D B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - 2.1 0.1 2025 Total PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/13/2020 ` -► c 4- k` 4\ t /" ' .d Movement EBL. EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) + r i 111 ) 'T), Traffic Volume(veh/h) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 Future Volume(veh/h) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No . Adj Sat Flow,vehih/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 24 203 241 326 380 120 229 304 190 141 533 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 1'09 530 449 422 422 133 296 663 562 420 573 27 • Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.09' 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow,vehih 1781 1870 1585 1781 . 1363 430 1781 1870 1585 1781 1772 83 Grp Volume(v),vehih 24 203 241 326 0 500 229 304 190 141 0 558 Grp Sat Fiow(s),vehin/in 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1793 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1855 , Q Serve(g_s),s 1.2 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24.0 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 • Cycle 0 Clear(g__c),s 1.2 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24.0 7.5 '11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Prop In Lane 1:00 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 109 530 449 422 0 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.38 0.54 0.77 0.00 0.90 0.77 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.93 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 109 530 449 422 0 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(!) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0:00 " 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),siveh 40.2 25.9 27.3 25.9 0.0 29.7 21.3 22.4 21.3 18.2 0.0 29.5 Ina Delay(d2),siveh 4.6 • 2.1 4.5 12.9 0.0 20.1 17.8 2.3 1.6 2.2 0.0 23.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 " 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/l6 0.6 3,6 4.6 3.8 „, 0.0 12.6 '°4.2 5.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 14.5 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.8 28.0 31.8 38.8 0.0 49.8 39.1 24.7 22.9 20.4 0.0 52.5 ' LnGrp LOS OCCD A DDCCC A D Approach VoL veh/h 468 826 723. 699 Approach Delay,siveh 30.8 45.5 28.8 46.0 Approach LOS C D C D Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 _ 5 6 ` 7 8, Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 11.2 ' 36.4 12.4 30.0 14.0 33.6 10.0 32.4 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.7 31.9 7.9 25.5 9.5 29.1 ' 5.5 27.9 - Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.7 13.3 9.9 13.6 9.5 28.2 3.2 26.0 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 2.1 ' 0.0 1.5 0.0 ' 0.3 0.0 0.6 Intersection:Sumnmary , .,. ..„- , , .. .. 1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.6 HCM 6th LOS 0 , I 2025 Total PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Appendix C Intersection Level of Service Definitions Highway Capacity Manual 2010 Signalized intersection level of service (LOS) is defined in terms of a weighted average control delay for the entire intersection. Control delay quantifies the increase in travel time that a vehicle experiences due to the traffic signal control as well as provides a surrogate measure for driver discomfort and fuel consumption. Signalized intersection LOS is stated in terms of average control delay per vehicle (in seconds) during a specified time period (e.g., weekday PM peak hour). Control delay is a complex measure based on many variables, including signal phasing and coordination (i.e., progression of movements through the intersection and along the corridor), signal cycle length, and traffic volumes with respect to intersection capacity and resulting queues. Table 1 summarizes the LOS criteria for signalized intersections, as described in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010(Transportation Research Board, 2010). Table 1. Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Average Control Delay Level of Service (seconds/vehicle) General Description A <10 Free Flow E >10—20 Stable Flow(slight delays) u Stable 35 flow(-accaptabiz~delays) I7 >35—55 Approaching.unstable flow(tolerable delay,occasionally wait through more than one signal cycle before proceeding) E >55—80 Unstable flow(intolerable delay) Fr >30 Forced flow(congested and queues fail to clear) Source:Highway Capacity Manual 2010,Transportation Research Board,2010. 1. If the volume-to-capacity(vie)ratio for a lane group exceeds 1.0 LOS F is assigned to the individual lane group.LOS for overall approach or intersection is determined solely by the control delay. Unsignalized intersection LOS criteria can'be further reduced into three intersection types:all-way stop, two-way stop, and roundabout control.All-way stop and roundabout control intersection LOS is expressed in terms of the weighted average control delay of the overall intersection or by approach.Two-way stop- controlled intersection LOS is defined in terms of the average control delay for each minor-street movement(or shared movement) as well as major-street left-turns. This approach is because major-street • through vehicles are assumed to experience zero delay, a weighted average of all movements results in very low overall average delay, and this calculated low delay could mask deficiencies of minor movements. Table 2 shows LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections. Table 2.Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay(seconds/vehicle) A 0-10 B >10-15 C >15—25 D >25-35 E >35—SO >50 Source:Highway Capacity Manual 2010,Transportation Research Board,2010. 1- if the volume-to-capacity(vie)ratio exceeds 1.0,LOS F is assigned an individual lane group for all i.irsigndfized intersections,or minor street approach at two-way stop-conlrotted intersections,Overall intersection LOS is determined solely by control delay. Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project Draft Environmental Assessment APPENDIX 3 Archaeological Field Inspection Report (This page intentionall} left blank] ` I '!'1\ SI I,(.1'.1. • S}. • I I ill lII tYt k 11111111 a t I + • � rI l.LL.(1F1t1111tL wre W STATE OF ND AJ I yil y t OilLAND AND NA l i R 1. la.SOURCES ?t \H 1(.11(11. t'RI-St I;`d.4 t1+1 l?i`c1S I.": 1,,r E.\Kt Belli WA lei 601 I'.;\\1111<1(A RI.\'D,S rl 555 lai}Uai'y l 5,202 t K.At u i-s, \Y:A11 4ie'oo:t IN R1:PLY REFLR"ft.): 7racic-1.ee Camera Project No. 2020PR00010 County of Hawaii—Planning Department Doe. No, 210!SN I 1 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Archaeology, I•lilo, III 96 770 tracie-lee.calllef:rr Etawaiicot.rnty.<gpv • Dear id'I .Carnero: • SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Itistoric Preservation Review State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application far Hale Ola O Mohouli COR-20-136782-Iia}v:►i`'s Island Community Development Corp. lvaiiikea Ahupua'a,South Hilo District,Island of Hawaii TiVf K:(3)2-4-001:168 This letter provides the State historic Preservation Division': (SI IPD's) review of the subject County of Hawaii State Land Use Boundary Amendment application received by our office on January 6, 2021. The submittal included a site map. the State Land Use(SLU) Boundary Amendment Application, a Department of Planning letter, and photos of the proposed project area.The project area consists of the entire 9.09-acre parcel. The applicant. Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (FHCDC), is requesting a State Land Use District Boundary amendment to change the SLU designation from Agriculture (A-1a) to Urban (RM-4). 1-IICDC • intends to develop the site as a "Pocket Neighborhood" development with small-scale. residential units surrounding common areas. Our records indicate that this project area has been subject to an archaeological inventory survey(AIS). No historic properties were identified during the A1S and the negative findings were presented in all archaeological assessment (AA) report (Haan 2008). SIIPI) accepted the Haun (2008) AA report in a letter dated May I I, 2016 (Log No. 2008.5033. Doe. No. 0811 r41D24). The proposed project area has been subject to previous grubbing and grading - permit review, resulting in delerrninations of no historic properties affected (e.g., Log No. 2014.05227, Doc. No. 1412SN02; Log No.2015.03678. Doe_No, 1511 SNO4).The SHPD has no new information or records of any known significant historic properties within or near the proposed'project area. Based on the information provided above. the S1:1PD has no objections to the proposed amendment to the SLU boundary application (COR•20-136782). however, SIIPI) requests the opportunity to review future permit applications involving ground disturbing activities. Pleas contact Sean Naletntaile at(808)933-7651 or at scatl.p.naleim tele, haw ii.gov for any questions or concerns • regarding this letter. Aloha, • Alan S.Downer.PhD Administrator,State I listoric Preservation Division Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer cc: County of Hawaii.Planning Department,planningtd hawaiicountv.gov Keith.Kato-HlCDC,keith.hicdcgmail.corn ett, Arch?e[ocjy • History• Ethnography•Arch.ti�ctur7I History Ati.ust 6. 2020 ASM Project No. 352 20.00 Keith Kato Executive Director I lawaii Island Community Development Corporation 100 Pauahi Street#204 Hilo. Hawaii 96720 email: keith.hicdc@gmail.com via email Subject: Field Inspection of the Hale Ola of Mohouli project area.TMK:(3)2-4-001:168,Waiakea Ahupua'a,South Hilo,Island of Hawaii. Dear Keith: As requested, ASM Affiliates (ASM) conducted an archaeological field inspection of the proposed Hale Ola o Mohouli project area, which comprises a 9.091-acre parcel (TMK: (3) 2-4-001:168) located in Waiakea Ahupua-a, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii (Figures I, 2,and 3).The purpose of the field inspection was to determine if historic properties exist within the subject parcel and to make recommendations regarding any additional HRS Chapter 6E requirements with respect to developing the parcel. This report summarizes the geological context of the subject parcel, the relevant findings from prior archaeological studies,details the findings from the current field inspection,and provides recommendations based on our findings. Geological Context The subject parcel is located entirely on the 1880-1881 i-lilo Lava Flow. Between May, 1880 and August, 1881,a series of eruptions on Mauna Loa sent lava flows down through the subject parcel, nearly reaching Hilo Bay(Figures 4 and 5). Kauahikaua et al.(2019)describe the route taken by the lava. On May 1. 1880, an eruption began in Moku'aweoweo,the summit craterofMauna Loa,and lasted a few days.The following November,the eruption resumed,this time from vents along the Northeast Rift Zone. Lava streamed down the mountain toward 1-filo Town, the main flow following what was then Ktiikuau Gulch. The flow reached the subject parcel in late June, 1881, completely covering it, and continued!»alai. The eruption continued until August 11, stopping just short of a mile from Hilo'Bay. The young lava and little soil development (Figure 6) on the subject.parcel and surrounding area was unsuitable for farming, or even grazing, and remained undeveloped (Figure 7) until the construction of the Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood project beginning in 2012.Due to this lava flow, there is a low likelihood of archaeological'sites or deposits predating 1881 on the subject parcel,and the land use history of the parcel suggests that few, if any, historic properties post-dating the eruption will be encountered. Prior Archaeological Studies Two prior archaeological studies have been conducted ,in the immediate vicinity of the subject parcel, neither of which identified any historic properties. An archaeological inventory survey (Robins et al. 1996) was conducted for the Mohouli Street Extension project, which included the road right of way adjacent to the subject parcel. No historic properties of any kind were identified during the that study. A second archaeological inventory survey(Haun 2008)was conducted for the Moltouli Heights Senior Neighborhood project area, which is located between the subject parcel and Komohana Street(now TMKs (3) 2-4- 011: 177, 17$, 184, 185. 186, and 187). The survey covered 15.9 acres and did not identify any historic properties. 820 Mililarii Street,,Suite 700,Honolulu,Hawaii 96813 (808)439-8089 Fax:(808)439-8087 507A East Lartikaula Street,Hilo,Hawaii 96720 (808)969-6066 Fax:(808)443-0065 www.asrnaffiilates.com • \lleusr 6.20211 Vicki Inspection sur the I1ai1c 01:t 0\lohouli l'rt jets Pa_c 2 of 10 Held Inspection Methods and Results On July 29, 2020. Johnny,Dudoit. B.A. and Olivia Crabtree. under the supervision of Benjamin Barna. Ph.D.(Principal Investigator)conducted a field inspection or the entire ground surface or the subject parcel. The ground surface was primarily pahoehoe bedrock covered with a yen thin layer of decomposed leaf litter, which is consistent with the USDA's mapped soil data (Figure 6). Vegetation was relatively thick (f=igures 8 thorough 13) and was dominated by guava (Rvic/coax sp.) saplings and scattered 'dhi'a (Heirosic%cr•os pol►'nr ha). with an understory or uluhe (Dirronop/cris /ine>aris). Introduced species typical of disturbed roadsides are present along Mohauli Extension. Despite the vegetation, it was possible to inspect the ground surface for lava tube entrances (none were noted) and surface features. No historic properties of any kind were observed. Summary and Recommendations As a result of the current field inspection, no historic properties of any kind were identified on the subject parcel. Our recommended determination of effect for the proposed project "no historic properties affected." Should you have any question or concerns,please don't hesitate to contact me directly. Sincerely. • r-') Benjamin Barna, Ph.D. Senior Archaeologist References Cited I-lawn, A. E. 2008 Archaeological Assessment,Portion of TRIK:(3) 2-4-01:168, Land of Waiakea,South 1-filo District. Island ofHawai'1. I-lit►n & Associates. Prepared for Brian Nishimura,1-Lilo. Kauahikaua, J., B. Gaddis, K. u. Kanalhele, K. Hon,and'W. Valerie 2019 The Lava Flow that Came to Hilo—The 1880-81 Eruption of Marna Loa Volcano, Island of Hawaii. United States Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2019-5 129. Lawrence, W. R. 1881 Map showing end of lava fiow near Milo, Hawaii, Aug. 24, 1881. Hawaii .Government Survey Registered Map No. 919. Robins,J., W_ Fortini,and R. Spear 1996 An Archaeological Inventory Survey of the ProposedMa ouli Connector Road.Ahupria'ca of Kukuan 1 and 2. Ponahawai, and Punahoa. South Hilo District. Island of&orrcri'1. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. Report SCS-085-2. Prepared for Youugki Hahn, Ph.D. Sherrod, D.,J. Sinton. S. Watkins, and K. Brunt 2007 Geologic Map of the State of Hawaii. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. Open-File Report 2007-1089. Electronic document. http://pubs.usgs.g.ovfoR2007/1.089.accessed Apr 27, 2018. Soil Survey Staff 2020 Web Soil Survey. United S'tcrteDeparntent o/Agriculture. iVatural.Resources Conservation Service. Electronic document, http://websoilsurvev.nres.usda.Uov. USAAF (,United States Array Air Forces)• 1940 Hilo and Maunci Loa in Distance, Hawaii, PH. National Archives and Records Administration Aerial Photograph 18-AA-37-026. Airseapes-Hawaiian Islands. Electronic document,https://cataloe.archives.aov,accessed May 18,2018. .ALtt;Ltst(.2I)21) I ieId Inspection for the I[ale OI:L o\lohottli I'micct I'aee 01 II) ry N Y a'Ci o.i::r111 mumr-1I,. Ir ‘,LlbJccl parcel • • 51) 1.000 portion of 1_ti(iti .{QuadranOc IIillVIII '_020 111111111=1111111111111111111.1Mcters — 1 1 1 I � _�_,IC 1. Subject parc.l location. 4- r IJ .;. I' "...J., I .. I .. — RJ 1 r .. ..two• •:.sae ter v. .Jx i e 1 '�. ,r11 1� :,...1 !�:-rte ° I— '�' Illy '531 '.�.' Ei9 ,A r?_ ..Nii_ .3J �'?.' r _ • ' -• Yw.Yrt•1 I PUJ r! 1 .•_� T- ..v`�. -.. i� - ., ' ..... r- f., kistet'A" s V — C W. • . ',L.-: 1 43), ,A,\Gt " 44/17'•':10.• ' ..:/'<.1,P'''.? ' ,141 ..„."' „., ‘...........J:' ' '' '''. '. ' i \4;4+� �� a� 5 R sr Jam' { / 1;, J ;.,:` . .. fro I� _ � • �1-j , y� i / al• 1+ 1 1 \ ll . ,,,., ..,',1=, N‘':-,--re-i't .,-;,;,,;?P;1. '''\ •-..0- ''', ... .4 . ‘- -'•''':C:: il• , --./.. ',(1..., -,% r \\ .',.--Y •Ii ___ , .7.1,#lisH 1(.,,,,.. ,:-.".:1.>„,.:1 ,...---"' , - \ ,,...?,"\\ \\.....„:„.0401"‘"""' !I' ' •/ �\/ _ - • ./ jam. Fti 1, �� - f1. ` C 7` - mow„ SJMI / ".'✓. \ ; PI: ��/// / `.T ✓� "; €d' ata��1, / I td -' J 2v J1� J I , • .,ur _..4..�� a r / ( F, i +IYAT J��' -1.. �! vu'I�r - {�,.i1 4r"It ...I :fl - - ! �I • t�--ter- I 1 ", 'iy l -� ft-- I I �! _ _....... 2 . C i .........,........r.......•it,r,nw o..,.... IN=0Pf-'1' SrENI ,RPOiE_ .,,E,c_ _ .-e•._E , . , Figure 2.Tax Map Key Plat(3)2-4-001 with the subject parcel indicated. •J3aa('d pofgns .Dip jo,{13Rr.U[1 311.113MS 1110300 arn l I s' 1N no; os S% t) 1 laikoro *1- .. ' E w�. .r!' ti r x ice' 1„h'ld 1111t' °I1()'lei 1 NI-II') uun"dsul I'I'” I OZ():'i) sofi 1\ • \ugust 6.21/20 1 lelti Inspection tUr the I kil.. ()I:I i. \toitoult I'roject TIL 6 tI.!0 0 250 500 1.000 1 1 \ \ 1 • • _ - • EiSubject parcel I.IL urc 4. Portion of Registered Map 919 with the subject parcel indicated(Lawrence 1881). flOtt ..trArt‘..,441! 4,049: is. A16. 2 Kau Basalt 750-1.500 yr Kau Basalt 750-1.500 r qtr, •.v i41,v.11,,i; )'•• tr?ir ‘-7-da.Y:t"...04 4,10 .41r .'421% IVF:1;:Arjiraldh°41$11 * 411 Kau 13acalt A.D. 1480-1881 IESubject parcel I Kau Basalt 750-1,500 yr Figure 5. Geology in the vicinity of the subject parcel (Sherrod et al. 2007). '(ob61 _lvvS(1)o1?H Jo ydpr;�o�ogd 1el.car,Ot'6 a jo uotuod •L aing13 i � `"' K Ai ."°.4-- -sir.._ -. •- '+ , '`. #^ .moi '. ^��r k--- _ rw,. -•.XeL '`s." ,,]Vs�.r.. ` `! "`" ,t, °.r �, ��'`' a � tl -r. ..-:,..,--x-:,4,--127,-.44,`!7=1" y Y,,Irt:2'„, } r t ♦ ,} .M ' t hUUll'101 ®'-. p.1Irtl 1„1411;. r (ozoZJJ 1s na 'ns nos) 13aird ;„fgns aqi to IC1111131A 0-N'1(.1!.11.11 ul silos paddtW .g aJn id ..,,J,,.tuaa;ad UI of i"vsitlition purl ur,{} I-ryrynr'y m-9 I> ...a:ai pl 01 'rtn;cat tu,;ld(.i,odntniol {Iq=t1 r:gcynr.'til i5`) sldojS itrvuYt 01 n1 c•rrr0; 4vtikL A 1SUI11.10U zip oi MMA`loalud ID31qnS '6 oinS!! , i• >,,- '`.0.' 4'.,, : ... 4.-- Ili _- - 0! ."1 '' : * ' *. • •• •- ,* ' S...4 . ... .. , . ., 1 " •* ' : ' '"'L.' ' - 1- ' ' .; 7,' ‘C' ,*4" •,. A. Z illi 1 ' . •:. • ' , 'Vs.'!`.. • ' •' .* ,r,..• 1.' it.' 1 ,,.,. „ , *. , , -.4 , "' . `,:.ro,..1%%.,‘ .--4,10;,' " ,t,•,_ ',Abe,,'',„c.. ... ,,,,..,— . '" ',-''' ''' •. ''f` u-4.'. ' ••••M'i• ' - '''J''''' ;CI' '' ''s‘ 1 ' '.i"liV"g74,.'cl'f 1 ."4.4"Vo.'Ir'''..' .'.. ', ' .'" Y .'.' ‘-,..'•t '1AI%.t ;,,Iitl,,,,a4.•''''4 • ,.. : "' ••- '.' . ...;'.•t•• ' "*... '. •••I LI ' ' ' "1..,,.,44..c.,:„,4.: * - '41'. , -04 t„ -1- •• Ai'' , -*" I ,:..,c, ',',..: , :..,:j.,•,,4. tf,,i?i 44eir '-i, ' 4„, • 511 iZ)', ,ii,L,.._, I.,: 44r, 1 V ' : , .- --- , - ki- -,:ipotf#R , ,,,. - '.4; , -,'''. zr 4'!., ',,,-.'' ...„4 (,..• ,,,,' .. ,t,,, 4.,-... , • .4.- ei,t, -: 1,t 7.-14,4% -':' '1°...'r' —Cie • .7..V A, 4 , .„; ,-,, T. 4,::.• ., 1* e--4.0, ,14,,, ., .---,,,,, -4 . -• ' '1'4 ', .„• '',. '''''1 11‘.11.1011 3[11.01 1‘..)1 1 133.trd ixligns '8 :1•In1,4 ..,„ Le ,64111114, .I, a. v4 , . . .. •-,.. - ' ' •• - ,' ' ,.,•e4- - ", , i : , -'1.- . • s.al.. .t?• 4.,,t, . 4-, - 44: + . w ,...,5-•,-. '''. , -.,:.iw4,-,, _...,,.,s 1 •••-• - . - ;44- .?-' •;4. ,` .1.4,--, 1,44,;:-t*. . ....0.1.• „..,44,„.. '...:'••..c..'4...=,''.,., ' .., , ,,. . ' ,I- '''•..'4 • I.' .,, Pelt '.. 211,'„;,. . .), . 1 (1)Jo..":I;1`,1 ' :%11 JO) IlttlIN'ed•411 pi I .N)1.01,1 111101101\0 11(,):It II ozoz.,1,11t.iiiN \ueti t(. '_f)_`tt I i;ltl Ittsp.itton tier III.;Ilia:()la o\l&ht ult Projccz Pay,,9)o(ll) I o ... ,,r'4, + Y I ' 4, fix, _ r I` �y t a .M .•A - 4 , '1 ,w ''',•':*,,,‘ :44:',..',-:`.,` �wy�.,*•'� A%-44111P— •j ▪�;4:&t f 41 + a""*`*, ,4,,44 74 1 `4 ~ 4' +''.'..' w+rr,"Tr x'+<: . . may' '.5 R� °A�Oaf +‘'' : "! y • ` �•.: . :?,s *trij t 3 r,:: 4 ,_. '� X4'1 ,.,, „ , = `: �.� . • y[ S,6y,4 . /_ • ,',. 1�{,. f do gg Figure 10. Subject parcel, view to the north. 1 4.#4 *: - k \ \ w r / 11/1*.ka- Y f 401 + 4' 11654 o- a , ,- * i ;Se. .. t s A t. �, 3 to 4 r. sva °"f1, r 11 „ ,'G "..:)q,A ,a•,•"7...4..,4-- 4 ' " r l `: 1.y „,t r o •,, r '`4 ae T,-..r„..., '1'1( 4.p ... . �`Vh � � y . Figure 11. Subject parcel,view to the northeast. Adults!6.20_10 t ilii Ill.pertion 10r tii 1lal:Oln o\haltlaui4 i'rojat Pa': 111111 10 anal - k..:.tib 1f t .►.)� ` \ l� '‘V"-'-''')': ' ) los-, _sem` ` a y.. 44ft° y� yEw � a \ 144z .fir .; sub ' ..._____,____*1-'1'V_.-04., `!k • -04., " '''''' 4 4. •,-� ,., - , _ y „� moi/ - ,• A" _ .., _ 440 Figure l2. Subject parcel. .te‘‘ to the northeast. tl "Y t r R „" 2 r r ' a) A - 1 , , ' • of% l .161 )--:IN s"az. ''.4 ...i 4' i � L� k 1\ 444. ' ' tl ''Ai .4.A:.'flk 1. ' , Tt tr.' ' 4 ..x. S.'''',0 li 1 ; ' ' 'I, ' ' . : V e. \ ,'erJw '� 3� 1M" �. , �. '�.a,.S, ;T . . .. 't {+:; I, c...'40, - ;� ',...'. 46711' ` ips 4 4 , kms. . 11 �. - e is :-- ,.r.'tir., .-�. i t ` • LC .. sitiii - a► i iit - i . �, �.� _ y y �c �a `r. .fes :vX VI_ >< rJw/. +N .T >�."'"! ,.y�j'1 �t w.3,yy,. i ..a,,^iw '', v 1 ._ ' , ' •t� a[ - 4 �?# �✓' R ,�'�.,y � .i' „}� �''/,�/ y ,..4 -t*-,..�y.y�, �}- J I ' ... "°4 iw'r,+fi 1 - .4✓:.m II e i\'_\�S� ••1 Figure 13. Subject parcel,view to the northeast. 'This I) 21 intentionally left blank Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project Draft Environmental Assessment APPENDIX 4 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Note: Appendices not included Available upon request to HICDC (This page• intentionally left blank' • PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR IMOHOULI STREET, TMK (3) 2-4-001 :168 HI LO, HAWAII 96720 NINA PROJECT 2271_3 DECEMBER 21, 20.16 f q, g' flk2 t I ' ` , $- A f"YY a v \t„..,...„ youfinh e Moi` A. tA8800� "F 8 Environmental Studies and Consulting Services 201) KolioU Spec', 1111o. l la\ aii. US\ 9( 720 • 8()x;.9',5 8727 99-1046 Ivv acna Su cot, Suutc 2 i OA. Aica. I-lak+ai all, [-S \ 90701 ° OS.48 t.9'14 , • ESA This Phase I LS.1 report is prepared for: County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo. Hawaii 96720 • PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR MOHOLLI STREET, TM (3) 2-4-001 : 168 HILO, HAWAII 96720 TMK (3) 2-4-001:168 9.091 acres 14NA Job No. 2271_3 • December 21, 2016. I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I- meet the definition of Environmental prgfessional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance 4vith the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR 312. Jessica Walsh Environmental Professional Myounghee Noh & Associates, L.L.C. Environmental Studies and Consulting Services . 200 Kohola Street, Hilo, HI 96720 Tel (808) 935-8727 www.noh-associatcs.com • 2271_3 ii Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment MIK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii k FINDINGS vii RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION I 1.1 PURPOSE 1.2 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.2.1 Site[Iu orti: l I 1.2.2 Regulator:Recorcls 3 1.2.3 Site Reconnaissance 3 1.2.4 Site Geology and Hvdrogeologv I 1.2.3 Data Evaluation and Reporting 4 1.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS 4 1.4 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS 4 1.5 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 4 1.6 USER RELIANCE 4 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 5 2.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5 2.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS 5 2.3 GEOLOGY 5 2.4 HYDROLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 7 2.5 CURRENT USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 8 2.6 STRUCTURES, ROADS. AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 8 2.7 PAST USES OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 8 2.8 CURRENT AND PAST USES OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES 8 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 21 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS 21 3.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE 22 3.3 VALUATION REDUCTION 22 3.4 REASON FOR PERFORMING THE PHASE I ESA 22 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW 22 4.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES ...................22 4.1.1 Federal Notional Priorities List 23 4.1.2 Federal RCRA CORRACTS TSD Facilities List 23 4.1.3 Delisted r\TPL Site List '3 4.1.4 Federal CERCUS List 23 4.1.5 Federal CERCLIS NFR.4P Site List/ 4.1.6 Federal RCRA non-CORRAC7S TSD Facilities List 24 4.1.7 State Brownfield Sites 74 4.1.8 State Hazardous Waste Sites 24 4:1.9 State Landiill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites 24 4.1.10 State LUST List 24 4.1.11 State Voluntary Cleanup Sites 25 4.1.12 Federal RCRA Genera ors List 25 4.1.13 State Registered UST List 25 4.1.14 Federal 1Cs and ECs Registries.. 25 2271_3 iii Myounghee Noh&Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD— Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo. Island of Hawaii 4.1.15 State 1Cs and ECs Registries 25 4.1.16 Fettered ERNS Li.sv 26 4.1.17 State Releases List 26 /N II/mi./Odds. • 26 4.2 ADDITIONAL RECORD SOURCES 26 '6 4.2.1 Sabiect Pro/ ' n. 4.2.2 Surroandin,t; Properties 26 4.3 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON TI IE SUBJECT PROPERTY 17 4.3.1 Historical Aerial Photographs • 27 4.3.2 Historical -1-.opographic Maps 4.3.3 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map 29 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 31 5.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 31 5.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING 31 5.3 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS 31 5.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS 31 5.5 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS .17 5.6 ABOVE GROUND AND UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS 32 6.0 INTERVIEWS 32 6.1 Gordon C. Heil.. DLNR • 32 7.0 DATA GAPS AND DEVIATIONS 32 8.0 KEY FINDINGS AND OPINION 33 8.1 Subject Property 33 8.2 Surrounding Area 33 8.2.1 Non- REC 9.0 CONCLUSION 34 REFERENCES 35 TABLES Table I. Hilo Aquifer Classification System 8 Table 2. Users and Primary Uses of Subject Property 9 Table 3. Users and Primary Uses of Adjoining Properties • 10 • Table 4. Aerial Photograph Details 27 FIGURES Figure 1. Site Location Map 2 Figure 2. TMK Map 6 Figure 3. Site Map • APPENDICES • Appendix A Environmental Data Resources Report and Maps Appendix B Site Reconnaissance Photographs Appendix C Additional Supporting Materials • • 2271_3 iv Myounghee Nob&Associates, L.L.C. • CCH OHCS—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Ht lo_ Island of Hawaii CC)\''FRlBU TORS Proicet Malta ,lesica \\'alsll Site Assessors Phillip Cabanii 1. Herbertsan Samos Report Writer Jessica Walsh. Graham Knopp [)raltct`Ilfusnatc7r Ilcrbcrtson ...autos QA Review I\1yottrn hcc 1t�11 • • • 2271_3 v Myounghee Noh &Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AST Aboveground Storage Tank • CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response. Compensation. and Liability Act CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response. Compensation. and Liability Information System CESQG Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators COH County oi•Hawaii CORRACTS RCRA Facilities that are undergoing-corrective action" EC Engineering Control EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc. EPA Environmental Protection Agency ERNS Emergency Response Notification System ESA Environmental Site Assessment FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency • FIDOII Hawaii Department of Health HOER Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response I-TELCO Hawaii Electric and Light Company IIFD • County of Hawaii Fire Department IC Institutional Control- LQG Large Quantity Generator LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank MNA Myounghee Noh & Associates, L.L.C. NFRAP No Further Remedial Action Planned NLR No Longer Regulated Generators NPL National Priorities List OHCD _ Office of Housing and Community Development RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act REC Recognized Environmental Condition SJIWB Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch SQG Small Quantity Generator TMK Tax Map Key TSD Treatment, Storage, and Disposal USGS United States Geological Survey UIC Underground Injection Control UST Underground Storage Tank VRP Voluntary Response.Program • •2271_3 vi Myounghee,Noh &Associates,L.L.C. CCH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001.168, Hilo. Island of Hawaii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Myoun�gliec Noh & Associates, L.L.C. (NINA), was retained in October 2016 to conduct a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the subject property located in Hilo. Island of Hawaii. and identified by Dour Tax Map Keys (TMK). Island 3, Zone 2. Section 4, Plat 001_ and Parcel 168. The subject property was owned by the State of Hawaii. This Phase I ESA was completed for the County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development for the potential acquisition of the property through an Executive Order from We Go%ernor for de\elopment as senior housing. The purpose of this Phase I ESA is to identify recognized environmental condition (REC) at the subject property,with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and petroleum products. A Phase I ESA consists of four parts. Three of those parts are intended to collect information that will aid in the identification of REC at the subject property. The information generating parts of the Phase 1 ESA consists of a review of state, federal, and local environmental records: a site reconnaissance visit: and interviews with key site personnel and other individuals with knowledge regarding the subject property. The fourth part of a Phase I ESA is a report that documents the collection of information about the subject property and evaluation of that information towards making a determination of the presence o.fREC at the subject property. The subject property was located in Hilo, in eastern Hawaii, approximately I�2 miles southwest of Hilo Bay and Waiakea Pond. The subject property was an unimproved vacant vegetated lot with no structures or roads present. FINDINGS No records of NPL sites, Federal RCR.A CORRACTS and Non-CORRACTS Treatment Storage Disposal Facilities, Delisted National Priority List sites, Federal CIRCUS sites, Federal CERCLIS NFRAP sites, landfill or solid waste disposal sites, State Leaking Underground Storage Tank List sites, State Voluntary Cleanup sites, Federal RCRA Generator sites, State registered UST sties, Institutional Controls/Engineering Controls registries, Federal ERNS list sites, Federal or State Brownfields sites were identified at the subject property or in the area surrounding the i-, subject property. Information provided as part of the User Questionnaire completed by Alan Rudo, project manager with the County of Hawaii Office of t-lousing and Community Development, did not indicate any RECs. NINA conducted an interview with Gordon C. Heit, Land Agent for the State of:Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources Land Division, owner and manager of the subject property. {his interview did not indidate any REECs. Based on a review of historic aerial photographs and topographic maps, no RECs were identified. - NINA requested records for review regarding the subject property, adjoining properties, and surrounding area from the State of Hawaii Department of Health (l-IDOH) Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch (Sl-IWB) and the County of Hawaii Fire Department (HFD). SHWB and HFD responded that they had no records regarding the subject. NINA reviewed I-{DOH Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response (MEER) Office publicly available files and sources online. No sites or incidents were listed for the subject or adjoining properties. 2271_3 vii 'Myounghee Noh &Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD— Phase i Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo. Island of Hawaii Limitations/Data Gaps/Deviations NINA encountered limitations in this Phase I ESA. During the site reconnaissance, there was limited access to the subject property due to the dense and impenetrable vegetation. fhc vegetation made it difficult to thoroughly inspect the ground surface and much of the interior of the subject property. There were no indications of illegal dumping. and therefore this is considered a minor data gap, as it is not anticipated that illegal dumpsites are hidden by the vegetation. There were no deviations from the Shun/my/Pracvice fi.)r Environmental Site ,Assessments: Phase I Ein ironmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM international:20 I 3). Non-REC • Subject Property During the site reconnaissance, MNA observed no evidence of REC. Surrounding Area During the site reconnaissance, LINA observed one propane aboveground storage tank (AST) located on the adjoining property to the west, TMK (2) 2-4-073:008. The AST was in good condition, and there was no stressed vegetation. Therefore, the AST is not considered a REC. EDR identified two hazardous waste sites located 3/4 mile away From the subject property: 600 Wailoa Street. Located 3/, mile and downgradient from the subject property was the Lanakila 1-comes Phase 3B-4 site. The site was identified as having heavy metal and lead contaminated soils present,and managed with controls. Due to the distance and proximity of this site from the subject property, it is not considered a REC. Non-Geocoded Location on Kaumana Drive. The 1-TELCO Pole-Mounted Transformer No. 20938 at Pole No. 7 was identified as having petroleum contamination in the soil. The contaminated soil was removed, and a No Further Action letter was issued on 05 June 2012. Due to the distance of this site from the subject property, this is not considered a REC. MNA reviewed the ,Final Environmental Assessment far Fire t1dministrcition Support Complex, Woiakea, Soi.itll Nilo, Island of Hawaii, TMK (3) 2-4-001:176 & 178 (Previously Parcel 168 [portion]),dated June 2009,which made no mention of hazardous materials or petroleum products at the adjoining property to the east (M&E Pacific, Inc., 2009). The'proposed Fire Administration. Support Complex would include administration, dispatch, and preparation/training buildings, warehouse, fire station, museum, open and covered training areas, site infrastructure, and paved access and parking areas. The use would include all operations and trainings. While the EA indicated no existing condition or impact li•oln the construction or use of the facility related to hazardous materials or petroleum products that could impact the subject property,MNA notes that should the facility be constructed and used as outlined in the EA, mock dire training including staging fires of burning materials and associated suppression techniques could impact air quality in the immediate vicinity of the facility, including the subject property. 2271_3 viii Myounghee'Noh&Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD— Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS • MNA performed a Phase I Enrirnttnteittctl Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations o[ASTM L 1527-13 ol'thc subject property identified as TMK(3) '-4-001:168 in 1-lilo,. Island of Hawaii. :any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 7.0 of'this report. This assessment has not revealed evidence of reco�ni_ccl environmental conditions based on existing conditions at the time of this Phase 1 site assessment: however, should the•Hre Administration Support Complex be constructed on the <idjoinin4 property to the east and used as outlined in the EA, mock lime training including staging fires of burning materials and associated suppression techniques could impact air quality in the immediate vicinity of the facility, including the subject property. • • 2271_3 ix MyO nghee Noh&Associates, COI-1 OFICD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-0011168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) conducted during October and November 2016 for the subject property identified by the Tax Map Key(TMK) of Island 3, Zone 2. Section 4, Plat 00 I, and Parcel 168 [TMK (3) 2-4-001:168] in Hilo. Island of Hawaii. The location of the subject property is identified in Figure 1. This Phase I ESA was conducted by Myoun2hee Nob & Associates, L„L.C.. herein referred to as NINA. Ibr the Count Y of Ilawu ii (CON)Office of Flousi m.2 and Community Development (01-ICD). • At the time of this Phase 1 ESA, the subject property was owned and operated by the State of Hawaii. • 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Phase I ESA is to identify any recognized environmental conditions (R ECs) at the subject property, with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and _Liability Act (CERCLA) and petroleum products. This practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner defense to CERCLA liability. "all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the site consistent with good commercial or customary practice." The term recognized environmental condition denotes the presence, or likely presence, of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on the property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material. threat of a release into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property (ASTM international,2013). This report is part of the Phase 1 ESA conducted for the subject property. The assessment was conducted in accordance with the practices described in Standard Practice for Environmental Site. Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM International, 2013). 1,2 .DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES A Phase I ESA has four components: records review, sit g:reconnaissance, interview, and report. NINA conducted this ESA using information sources with the potential to identify past or current releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products into the subject property. Adjoining properties were also evaluated for their potential to impact the subject property. Per the ASTM International Phase 1 ESA Standard, adjoining properties include parcels touching the subject property as well as those properties across a roadway (ASTM International, 2013). 1.2.1 Site History Where available and as needed, MNA researched historical and current.topographic maps, tax records, fire insurance maps, and aerial photographs to identify previous and current uses of the property, adjoining properties, and the surroundinL, area. 2271_3 1. Myounghee Noh&Associates;L.L.C. ,. . •,' ,' , S ilo Bay' " '"- ' --,, ...- .' Ho Internati., Airport: '' -. ••4.: ''. ''' - - ' - :.. ".. :''.. - '. '; e 1'.• - • ''''•^1,... ,'" "-, . .' ... . .. • , ;'- 4 " 7 qv _ • -", —4- '- '47, liVaiakea Pond "N- •,-."4! ''''-''' .• ' '1 ,.., .... .. ..• ::-., ,* ,....a;-••-••:::"... '#.....,••• .:111';,'......--''''' -'-';';' " . "V F...N. '''': '.7-- 4 • , •- - AS% , •-•. ;* 'IF N'a. 4. ' -.. . ' - . ... . ,a .1, ."... • ,, ,, ......, , .. S'O• i' ,,, ..;• , .. • (4 *.' . • • • '• . . -.. l• . • • Ar •+:'. ,"'TO \ •F '',.•' ''.‘•'-'3, - .- .• -. % - . .. Nt 6.* . / '•:, . . ' V .' A. ,.,.. 1't‘': ..:*' ". '. '„ 1 * '', .• .. , • • ''' '.",f" '' ' -'' .... ' .• • .0. '. • t '4‘ ' .k.• '... :• ' • e 2.•:.. , . ' , ,t, ,--, 'u 1,04,4 ., ..., ,,... v. . .0 T.::I V . ii, ...i. • 4,,,„ , .. • / t - \ 01 ..: Subject Property r_ 0 5 ",,Ii; , 6 'Ai. ,"' Figure 1. Site Location Nlap Phase 1 ESA IN Mohouli Street, Hilo, Hawaii TMK (3) 2-4-001 168 • flap Area Myounghee Noh- MNA Project No 2271_3 Associates,L.L.0 _ Page 2 COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo, Island of Hawaii 1.2.2 Regulatory Records • MNA examined government records with respect to environmental conditions, citations. complaints, and permits at the subject property, at adioining properties. and within the surrounding area. MNA utilized a records search provided by Environmental Data Resources. Inc. (EDR), to review records from the lollowing federal and state programs: • National Priorities List (NPL) • Delisted NPL • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities that arc undergoing "corrective action" (CORRAC.TS) • RCRA-Treatment, Storage, & Disposal (TSD) • Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation & Liability Information System (CERCLIS) List • CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) List o Federal and Hawaii State Brownfields o Hawaii Solid Waste & Landfill • Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) • RC RA-Violators/Enforcement • Underground Storage Tank (UST) • Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) • RCRA—Generators, including those No Longer Regulated (NLR) • Hawaii Sites of Interest • Hawaii Releases • Federal and Hawaii State Land Use Controls • Hawaii Voluntary Cleanup Sites • Tribal Lands Additionally, MNA requested state environmental case files from the Hawaii Department o:f Health (HDOH) and County of Hawaii Fire Department (IIFD). • 1.2.3 Site Reconnaissance NINA performed a site .reconnaissance to obtain information indicating the likelihood of contamination, to interview available site personnel, and to conduct a brief assessment of the adjoining properties. During the site reconnaissance, MNA looked for a variety of indicators of environmental hazards including, but not limited to, stained surface soil, dead or stressed vegetation, hazardous substances, aboveground and underground storage tanks, disposal areas, groundwater wells, drywells, and sumps. Sampling and testing of soil, surface water, or groundwater were not•part of this assessment. 1.2.4 Site Geology and Hydrogeology MNA reviewed published information for the property and surrounding area on surface and subsurface conditions such as topography, drainage, surface water bodies, subsurface geology, and groundwater. MNA used this information to assess the potential for migration and impact of the subject property by releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products at off-site properties. 2271_3 3 Myounghee Noh&Associates,L.L.C. CON OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:163. Hilo, Island of Hawaii 1.2.5 Data Evaluation and Reporting \'INA evaluated the information collected. and prepared this report as part of the assessment. Section 2 presents the site background information: Section 3 user provided information: Section 4 information collected from records review; Section 5 site reconnaissance: Section 6 interviews: Section 7 data ;gaps; Section 8 key findings and opinion: and Section 9 conclusion. 1.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS The conclusion presented in this report is based upon the assumption that reasonably ascertainable and relevant information pertaining to the environmental condition of the subject property was made available to i\`INA (luring the assessment. Information obtained from government agencies and other resources is presumed to be accurate and updated. Additionally, information collected in interviews is collected in"good faith"and believed to be true and accurate to the best knowledge of the interviewee. 1.4 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS The Phase 1 ESA provides a "snapshot" of the property conditions at the time of the assessment. Findings, opinions, and conclusions apply to property conditions existing at the time of the investigation and those reasonably foreseeable. They do not apply to conditions at, or changes to, the property, of which MNA is not aware, could not reasonably be aware, and has not had the opportunity to evaluate. This report is based upon visual observations of the subject property and its vicinity, interpretation of the available historical and.regulatory information and documents reviewed, and interviews of individuals with knowledge of the subject or surrounding property. MN.A cannot ensure the accuracy of the historical or regulatory information. This report is intended exclusively for the • purpose outlined and applies only to the subject property. This Phase I ESA excludes asbestos, lead paint; and investigation of geotechnical concerns. No surface or subsurface sampling was involved. 1.5 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS This Phase I ESA was conducted and prepared by MNA for the exclusive use of the COH OHCD. This report shall not be relied upon or transferred to any other party without written authori2ation from COH O;ICD. 1.6 USER RELIANCE This report is an instrument of service of MNA, which summarizes its findings and opinions with respect to recognized environmental conditions at the subject property. Findings and opinions are predicated on information that MNA obtained on the dates and from individuals stated herein, from public records reviewed, a site reconnaissance, and ancillary Phase I ESA activities. This assessment relies upon the accuracy and completeness of the information provided. The information obtained for this assessment is used ithout extraordinary verification. It is possible that other information exists and is discovered, or environmental conditions change subsequent to the submittal of this Phase I ESA report,to which MNA shall not be held responsible for exclusion. 2271_3. 4 Myotsnghee Roh,&Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment ' TMK(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION This section contains location and legal description; site and vicinity L_eneral characteristics: current subject property use; structures, roads, and other improvements: past subject property use: and current and past use of adjoining properties. 2.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property is located at TMK (3) 2-3-001:168 in H do, Island of Hawaii. According to . the County of Hawaii tax records. there is no physical address assigned. and the parcel is zoned as agricultural (County of Hawaii, 2016). Mohouli Street borders the property to the south. and the intersection of Mohouli and Kukuatt Streets is approximately 300 feet west of the subject property. A TMK map is presented in Figure 2. 2.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS The subject property is located in Hilo, in eastern Hawaii, approximately I:2 miles southwest of Hilo Bay and 1Vaiakea Pond. The subject property was an unimproved vacant veggetated lot with no structures or roads present. • The subject property is located adjacent to Mohouli Street. Vacant lands are located nearby to the south southwest. Residential areas are present to the north, south. and east. 2,3 GEOLOGY • The Island of Hawaii is of volcanic origin and was accumulated by the combination of Kohala, Mauna Kea, ivlauna Loa, Kilauea, and Hualalai volcanoes. The island is comprised of numerous thin, extremely permeable tholeiitic (relatively rich in silica and iron) basalt lava flows (Stearns, 1985). Hawaii, the youngest and largest Hawaiian Island, is larger than all the other Hawaiian Islands combined. Hazlett and Hyndman (1996) describe the island as follows: it {Hawaii Island] sprawls over an area the size of Connecticut, spanning 90 miles from north to south and 80 mils from east to west. Five large volcanoes coalesce to make the visible part of the Big Island; a sixth lies buried beneath the surface. The southern part of the island is still volcanically active and building out along much of the coastline. To the north, volcanism is in the waning stages. Of all the Hawaiian Islands, the Big Island shows the greatest diversity of rocks and landscapes (Hazlett & I-lyndman, 1996). • The subject property is located on the lower southeastern slopes of the Mauna Loa volcano, an active shield volcano Mauna Loa and the second youngest of the live Hawaiian volcanoes. Mauna Loa volcano is the largest volcano on the Island of Hawaii, making tip 50.5% of the land area of the island(Morgan, 1996). The USGS Geological Survey geologic map of Hawaii Island indicates that the subject property is underlain by lavas from a relatively recent Manna Loa for from 1880 (Wolfe, E.W. & Morris,J., 1996). 2271_3 . 5 Myounghee Noh&Associates,L.L.C. / <, J /,�`ty;4_, --,, Vie.. _, "- . YrJ A,.\ i t.•�lf t )/ s,1 14 % l ..„,„<\::<\\ ti / ..i / S'. o :\:\ 0‘ \ 1KN, c<:)\>„ J °.'4 . p O j pv), \ ,5`pp \\1r:\\*.k.7'9 3° �' 7073:oo7 .pps0 / / '9 .0498 Subject Property \ \\ 0 . 001'168 001.176 30�9 No Physical Address gg1ggg 3:07f 104°14 7 Scale 001.122 1O1 1:k„urc 2. 1N1K Flap Phase I Environmental Site Assessment a Z- Site TMK(3)2-4-001'168 \L;(..... Mohouli Street. Hilo. Hawaii MNA Project No 2271_3 Myounghee Noh& Page 6 Associates. L.L C • COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site'Assessment • TPM(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii The United Slates Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service classifies the soil at the subject property as Kcaukaha highly decomposed plant material, 2 to 10 percent slopes (series 652. national map unit symbol 2klld), composed primarily of highly decomposed organic material over pahoehoe lava flows. with a depth to bedrock of4 to 14 inches. This soil is described as well drained with a low to moderately low capacity to transmit water (0.00 to 0.06 in hr) (United States Department of Agriculture. 2016). The land capability classification for this soil is is, indicating that this soil has very severe limitations that make it unsuited for Cultivation and that restrict its use mainly to grazing, forestland, or wildlife. The "s'' subclass indicates that his soil is made,up of soils that have soil limitation within the rooting zone, such as shallowness of the-rooting zone. stones. low moisture-holding capacity. low fertility that is difficult to correct, and salinity or sodium content. 2.4 HYDROLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY The HDOH Safe Drinking Water Branch established an Underground Injection Control (UIC) line to serve as a boundary between drinking water and non-drinking water portions of aquifers. Areas above (mountain side) the U1C line are within drinking water portions of the aquifer, while areas below (ocean side) the UIC are in non-drinking water portions of the underlying aquifer. The subject property is above the UIC in a drinking water portion Of the aquifer(Hawaii :Department of Health Safe,Drinking Water Branch, 2014). The hydraulic gradient of the basal groundwater within the basaltic formation is, in general, from mountain areas to the shoreline. According to the Mink and Lau (1990), the subject property is located above the Hilo aquifer and described the hydrogeology and aquifer as follows: Average annual rainfall starts at 120 inches at the coast, increases to a maximum of 300 inches, then decays to 20 inches on the upper slopes of Mauna Loa. Despite the extraordinary rainfall, perennial streams do.not exist south of Wailuku River. Rain easily infiltrates into the permeable basalt. A voluminous basal lens extends at-least 4 miles inland of the coast, beyond which high-level water has been encountered. As the groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property is basal, it can be found at a depth roughly corresponding to its elevation, or about 350 feet bgs (below ground surface). The flux of groundwater in this basal lens is enormous; the fresh water springs at Hilo-Waiakea have been measured at 150 million gallons per clay. The gradient is about 5 feet per mile,and the permeability of the basalt is probably at least 5,000 feet per day (Mink &Lau,. 1990). Information for the Hilo aquifer is provided in Table 1 (Mink&Lau, 1990). • The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood map for the area (155166088OC September 16, 1988, revised December 21, 2006) indicates that a flood area traverses the midsection of the subject property. This.area, comprising about 50-60% of the entire property, is designated special flood hazard area Zone A, areas with a 1% annual chance of flooding inundation, but without base flood elevation determined (Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1988). This flood area is part of the Mohouli area drainage, which is confluent with the Alenaio Flood Control Channel near the University of Hawaii at Hilo campus. 2271_3 • 7 Myounghee Noh&Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii Table 1. Hilo Aquifer Classification System • Aquifer Code 1 80401111 Island Code 5—I Iawaii Aquifer Sector 04—Northeast \fauna Loa Aqui ler System 01 1liko \quifcrType. hydrogeology 1 -Basal Aquiler Condition I—l:'nconfined Aquifer Type, geology I—Flank, Horizontally extensive lavas . Status Code 1 1111 Development Stage. I--Currently used U tility 1—Drinking* Salinity (in mg/L Cl') 1—Fresh(<250) Uniqueness 1-Irreplaceable Vulnerability to Contamination 1-1-Iigh mg/'L Cl--milligrams per liter or chloride • 2.5 CURRENT USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property was owned by the State of Hawaii. There are no structures on the subject property. It is vacant, unused, and vegetated land. 2.6 STRUCTURES, ROADS, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS No structures,roads, or other improvements had been made to the subject property. No electrical, telephone, sewer, or water service was connected at the property. The propertyis p subjectsubject accessed from Mohouli Street,along the southern border where storm water drainage was observed along the street. A site map is presented in Figure 3. 2.7 PAST USES OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Information regarding past uses of the subject property was obtained from a review of tax records (County of:Hawaii. 2016), historic topographic maps and aerial photographs, and interviews. According to the County ofHawaii Real Property Tax Office, the State of Hawaii owns the subject property, and has since 1949. The County of Hawaii does not have property tax records on the subject property prior to 1949. Table 2 summarizes available information regarding the historical use and users of the subject property. 2.8 CURRENT.AND PAST USES OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES Information regarding past uses of the adjoining properties was obtained from review of tax records (County of Hawaii, 2016), historic y topographic maps and aerial photographs (Environmental Data Resources, Inc.. 2016) and interviews. The property use information is summarized in Table 3. 2271_3 8 Myounghee (qqh&Associates,L.L.C. CON OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii Table 2. Users and Primary Uses of Subject Property Period \ Area Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee Primary Use (approx.) (acres) TMK (3) 2-4-001:168; Mohouli Street, Hilo 2008-Present State of Hawaii 9.091 Undeveloped 0.354 acres from TNIK (3) 2-4-001:178 2008 6.373 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:177 5.003 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:176 2000-2008 State of Hawaii 30.396 Undeveloped 2000 30.396 acres from TiVIK (3) 2-4-001:122 1979-1999 State of 1-iawaii 318.668 Undeveloped 1979 0.517 acres to TMX (3) 2-4-001:166 1968-1979 State of Hawaii 319.205 Undeveloped 1968 319.205 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:041 1967-1968 State of Hawaii 499.827 Undeveloped 0.493 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-001:119 1967 8.588 acres dropped into a road 6.199 acres to 'FMK (3) 2-4-024:072 1.667 acres dropped into a road 1965-1967 State of Hawaii 516.774 Undeveloped 6.621 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-024:024 1965 6.021 acres to TNIK (3) 2-4-001:019 1.2 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:023 1950-1965 State of Hawaii 526.716 Undeveloped 1950 10.205 acres to TiV1K (3) 2-4-023:131 19.095 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-024:148 1949-1950 State of Hawaii 556.016 Undeveloped 46.344 acres to TM.K (3) 2-4-023:053 30.950 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:027 13.640 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:038 1949 1.880 acres from T>`IK (3) 2-4-001:042 50.000 acres from TM K (3) 2-4-001:039 7.313 acres from TNIK (3) 2-4-001:049 0.313 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-001:052 1949 State of I-iawaii 498.890 Undeveloped TM K-Tax Map Key 2271_3 9 Myounghee Noh&Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD-Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Tfv1K(3)2-4-001-168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii "Table 3. Users and Primary Uses of Adjoining Pro erties Period Arca • Owner/Lessee/Sup-Lessee Primary Use (approx.) (acres) • TM1< (3) 2-4-001:176; .'lohouli Street. }silo Adjoining property to the East 2008-Present State 01'Hawaii 5.003 Undeveloped 2008 5.003 acres from Til K (3) 2-4-001:168 2000-2008 State of Hawaii 30.396 Undeveloped 2000 30.396 acres front TM K (3) 2-4-001:122 1979-1999 State of Hawaii 318.668 Undeveloped • 1979 0.517 acres to TM K (3) 2-4-001:166 1968-1979 State of Hawaii 319.205 Undeveloped 1968 319.205 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:041 1967-1968 State of Hawaii 1499.827 I Undeveloped 0.493 acres to TM1< (3)2-4-001:119 $.588 acres dropped in to tl road 1967 • 6.199 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-024:072 1.667 acres dropped into a road 1965-1967 State of Hawaii 516.774 Undeveloped 6.621 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-024:024 1965 6.021 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-001:019 1.2 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:023 1950-1965 State of Hawaii 526.716 Undeveloped 1950 10.205 acres to ',FMK (3)2-4-023:131 19.095 acres to TVIK_(3)2-4-024:148 1949-1950 State of Hawaii 556.016 Undeveloped 46.344 acres to TM1< (3)2-4-023:053 30.950 acres from TMK (3)2-4-001:027 13.640 acres from TMK(3) 2-4-001:038 1949 1.880 acres from 1-N K (3) 2-4-001:042 50.000 acres from TMK(3) 2-4-001:039 7.313 acres from TALK (3)2-4-001:049 0.313 acres to TMK (3)2-4-001:052 1949 State of Hawaii 498.890 Undeveloped TMK (3) 2-4-073:002; 807 Kukttau Street, Hilo Adjoining property to the Northeast • 2002-Present Julian William S. Trust• 1.256 Residential Julian, Catherine C. 'Trust Citu. Yih-Horn 1994-2002 • Che, I ittei \lei C. 1.256 Residential • 1991-1994 Yamanaka. Melvin I. 1.256 Residential Yamanaka, Della M. 1991 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1.256 Residential • 1991 1.256 Acres from TMK (3) 2-4-008:014 1990-1991 USC, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki Matsuo 180.812 Undeveloped 2271_3 10 Myounghee Noh &Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:162. Hilo. Island of Hawaii Period Area Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee Primary Use (approx.) (act-es) I986-1990 Auto Import or Hawaii. Inc. I 80.81 ) Undeveloped Sifted Kagawa GEK. Inc. Katco. Int. 1986 Kasons, Inc. 180.812 t_IndeN eloped .11 Tradini. Co.. Ltd. Auto Imports orIIawaii, Inu. Farms & Ranches. Inc. 1982-1986 Kul:uau Development Corporation 180.512 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-008:026 1982 • 0.361 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.902 Siegfred Kagawa GEK. Inc. Katco, Inc. Kasons, inc. 371;.23S Vacant JT Trading Co., Lid. • Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms Ranches.Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Katco, Inc. 1980 Kasotts, Inc. 373.235 • Vacant John Stratton Tolniie Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms& Ranches. Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust 1978-1980 Fay Linger 373.235 Vacant Robert Richardson Trust Hawaiian Trust Co.. Ltd. Robert Richardson 191 1978 Julius Richardson'Trust 373.2>5 Vacant Geo Richardson -frust Thomas Guard 1951 34.170 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-008:015 1931 Akana Richardson Estate 407.405 Vacant Kinoole Development Co., Ltd. TMK (3) 2-4-073:003; 815 Kukuau Street, filo Adjoining property to the North 2006-Present David Roy 1.220 Undeveloped tMartins. Demetra Leslie Martins, David R. 1992-2006 Martins, DeMetra L. 1.220 Undeveloped 1991-1992 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1.220 • Undeveloped 1991 1.220 Acres from TIVIK(3) 2-4-008:014 2271_3 11 Myounghee Noh &Associates;L.L.C. • COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001'.168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii Period Area (rrppr e` .) Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee ( roes) Primary Use 1990-1991 HSC, Inc. 180.512 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki \Iatsuo 180.812 Undeveloped 1986-1990 Auto Import of l la\ . Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped Siegl'rcd Kngav a G[K. Inc. Katco. Inc. • 1986 Kasons. Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped JT Trading Co.. Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches. Inc. 1982-1986 Kukuatr Development Corporation 180.812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TM"( (3) 2-4-008:026 1982 0.361 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.902 Sieg red Kagawa GEK, Ire. Katco, Inc. 1980-1952 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped .IT Trading Co., Ltd. Auto imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco. the. 1980 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped Joim Stratton Tolmie Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms &Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust 1978-1980 Fay Linger 373.235 Undeveloped Robert Richardson Trust Hawaiian Trust Co.. Ltd. • Robert Richardson Julius Richardson Trust 1951-1975 `1 373.2 35 Undeveloped Geo'Richardson rust Thomas Guard 1951 34.170 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-008:015 1951 Akana Richardson Estate • 107.405 Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co., Ltd. TNIK (3) 2-4-073:004; 817 Kukuau Street, 1-silo • Adjoining property to the North • Okuda.Chad Tatsuo 2003-Present • Okuda. Tiffanie �V\ranti 1.129 Residential 1992-2003 Abe, Nathan N. 1.129 Residential Abe, Tracy M. T. 2271_3 12 Myounghee Noh&Associates,L.L.C. • COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TPM(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii Period Area Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee Primary Use (approx.) (acres) l qg� Tani<ttuchi, L'ary K. 1.129 Residential Abe. I racy M. T. 1991-1992 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1.129 Residential 1991 1.129 Acres from T•\1K (3) 2-4-008:014 1990-1991 1ISU. Inc. I$ft$12 Undeveloped 1990 Clliaki Matsu() 180.81-) Undeveloped 1986-1990 Auto Import of Ilawaii. Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped SiegIred Ka:La wa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1986 .Kasons, Inc. 180.512 Undeveloped IT Trading Co., Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii. Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. t. 1982-1986 Kukuau Development Corporation 180.812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to Ti\'JK (3) 2-4-008:026 1982 0.361 acres front FMK (3) 2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.902 Siegfied Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. Kasons. Inc. 1980-1982 1T Trading, Co.. Ltd. 373.235 Undeveloped Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation SiegFred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980 Kasons. Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped John Stratton Tolmie Auto Imports of I-lawan. Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust Fay Linger 1975-1950 Robert Richardson Trust '73.235 Undeveloped Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd. Robert Richardson Julius Richardson Trust 1951-1975 Geo Richardson Trust '73.235 Undeveloped Thomas Guard 1951 34.170 acres to TINIK (3) 2-4-008:015 1951 Akana Richardson Estate 407. 05 Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co.,Ltd. TIYIK (3) 2-4-073:005; 825 Kukuau Street, Hilo Adjoining property to the,North 2271_3 13 Myounghee Noh&Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3) 2-4-001'162, Hilo. Island of Hawaii Period Area (approx.) Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee (acres) Primary Use 1996-Present Park, Mvoung N. 1.005 Residential [.Gutierrez. ,lose U. 1991-1990 Gutierrez, Yolanda 1.005 Residential 1991 Four Real Partnership 1.005 Residential 1991 Sunrise [states Joint Venture 1.005 Residential 1991 1.005 Acres from "1"111< (3) 2-4-008:014 1990-1991 HSC, Inc. 180.812 LIndcvelopedUndeveloped 1990 Chiaki Matsuo 180.812 Undeveloped 1986-1990 Auto Import of Hawaii, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped Siegfred Kativawa GEK, Inc. Katco, inc. 1986 Kasons, Inc.. 180.812 Undeveloped JT Trading;Co.. Ltd._ Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches. Inc. 1982-1986 Kulzuau Development Corporation 180.812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TVIK (3) 2-4-008:026 1982 0.361 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-069:039 Area revised�scd to 373.902 Siegfred Kagawa GLK,'Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980-1982 Kasons, Inc' 373.2"35 Undeveloped JT Trading Co., Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegfred Kagawa G EK,• hlc. Katco, Inc. 198b K.asons. Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped John Stratton Tolmie Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches. Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust Fay Linger _ 1978-1980 .37.3.215 Undeveloped Robert Richardson Trust Hawaiian Trust Co.. Ltd. • Robert Richardson 1951-1978 Julius Richardson Trust 373?35 Undeveloped Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard 1 95 1 34.170 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-008:015 2271_3 14 Myounghee Noh &Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo. Island of Hawaii Period Area > >ro�.) Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee (acres) Primary Use (approx.)I A Ikana Richardson Estate 1951 Kinoc7le Development Co.. Ltd. 407.405 Undeveloped TMK (3) 2-4-073:0(16; Kukuau Street. ]-filo Adjoining property to the North Goodwin. James Von bill 2004-Present 1.000 Undeveloped eloped Goodwin. Jov I Iansuc Yamashita 1991-200I Tavares. Marion R. 1.000 Undeveloped Tavares. Laura C. 1991 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1.000 Undeveloped 1991 1.000 Acres from Ti\lK (3) 2-4-008:014 1990-1991 HSC, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki t\latstio100.81' Undeveloped • 198o-1990 Auto Import of Hawaii, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1986 Kasons, Inc, 180.812 Undeveloped JT Trading Co.. Lid. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. 1982-1986 . Kukuau Development Corporation 180.812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK (3)2-4-008:026 1982 0.361 acres Irorn TMK (3) 2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.902 Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980-1982 Kasons, Inc. 373.23 Undeveloped JT Trading Co., Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawan, Inc. Farms & Ranches. Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegfred Kagawa • GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. Kasons, Inc. 1980 John Stratton Tolmie 373.235 Undeveloped Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust Fay Linger ,_ 1978-1980 Robert Richardson Trust 373.2a� Undeveloped Hawaiian Trust Co.. Ltd. 2271_3 15 Myounghee Noh &Associates, L.L.C. CON OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii Period Area Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee • Pt imar\ t.-se (approx.) (acres) Robert Richardson t_5 Julius Richardson Trust I9 373.235 liitdc\rlohc�l . I-1 )! • Geo P.ichardscm Trust Thomas Guard 195 I 34.170 acres to T M K (3) 2-4-008:015 I 951 407.405 Richardson Estate 1(i7.4(15 Undcvclopzd Kinoale Developinetit to.. Ltd. MIK (3) 2-4-073:007; 833 Kukuau Street, Hilo Adjoining property to the North Sunni, Brian T. Trust 2014-Present 1.000 Residential Nang Suti�ai. Nine Trust Sugai. Brian Tadashi ?(.1 l4 - Wang-Sugai, .ling Wa 1.000 Residential 2009-2014 Tseng. Trust 1.000 Residential ITseng, Raymond Chi-Jen 2004-2009 1.000 Residential - - Tseng, Rose Yun Li Van Der Ilel, Cornelis Pieter 200 I-200{ 1.000 Residential Karow, Vena Mae 1992-2001 Paradis, �{ dward F. 1.000 Residential Parades, Y�asulko 1992 Young, Mary J. 1.000 Residential 1991-1992 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1.000 Residential 1991 1..000 Acres from TMK (3) 2-4-008:014 1990-1991 HSC, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki Matsuo .180.812 Undeveloped 1986-1990 Auto import of Hawaii., Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped • S:ieg'flreel.Ka gawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1986 Kasons. 180.812 ! Undeveloped JT Trading Co., Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms& Ranches,Inc. 1982-1986 Kukuau Development Corporation 180.8.12 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-008:026 1982 '0.361 acres from TMK(3) 2-4-069:039 Arca revised to 373.902 Siegfred Kagawa GLK, Inc. Katco. Inc. 1.980-1982 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped JT"trading Co., Lid. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation 2271_3 16 Myounghee Noh&Associates,L.L,C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001'168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii Period Area Owner/LcssccISub-Lessee Primary Csc (approx.) (acres) Sie<gfl-ed Kaygawa GEK. Inc. Katco. Inc. 1980 Kasons. Inc. 373,235 Undeveloped John Stratton I llmic Auto Imports of Hawaii. Inc. Farms Ranches, Inc. Sea Gills Corporation Geo Richardson Trust Fay Linger 1978-1980 Robert Richardson frust 373.715 Undeveloped Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd. Robert Richardson Julius Richardson Trust Undeveloped 1951-1978 373.235 ' Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard • 1951 34.170 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-008:015 195! Akana Richardson Estate 407.405 Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co., Ltd. TMK (3) 2-4-073:008; 847 Kukuau Street, Hilo Adjoining property to the West 2008-Present Saboani, Lovina 1-lariram 1.002 Residential 2000-2008 Palen, Fredrick L. 1.002 Residential Fergerstrom-Palea, Cindy-Lu 1995-2002 Takase, Glenn M. 1.002 Residential Takase. Kayleen K. Kubota, Peter K. 1992-1995 Sonotnura. Julann A1. K. 1.002 Residential 1991-]992 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1.002 Residential 1991 1.002 Acres from TMK (3) 2-4-008:014 1990-1991 HSC, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki iMatsuo 180.812 Undeveloped 1986-1990 Auto Import of Hawaii. Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped Siegfi•ed Kagawa GEK. Inc. Katco, Inc. 1986 Kasons, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped JT Trading Co.. Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms& Ranches. Inc. • 1982-1986 Kukuau Development Corporation • 180.812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-008:026 1982 0.361 acres from TNIK(3) 2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.902 2271_3 17 IVIyounghee Noh&Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD–Phase I Environmental 5ite Assessment Tfv1K(3)2-4-001'168. Hito, Island of Hawaii Period .area • Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee Primary Use (approx.) (acres) Sic`=feed Kagawa GEK. Inc. Katco. Inc. Kii ns. Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped .1"1"fr.tdine Co., Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii. Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegfred Ki1gawa GEK, Inc. Katco. Inc. i 1980 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped John Stratton Tolmie Auto imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust.` — �`- — -----` 1978-1980 Fay Linnet 373.235 Undeveloped Robert Richardson Trust Hawaiian Trust.Co., Ltd. Robert Richardson 1951-1978 Julius Richardson Trust 373.235 Undeveloped Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard 1951 34.170 acres to 'FMK(3) 2-4-008:015 3 951 Akana Richardson Estate 407.405" Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co., Ltd. TNIK (3) 2-4-073:009; 851 Ktlkuau Street, Hilo Adjoining.property to the West 2002-Present .Deetman. Louis Jit-ielena C. Trust 1.027 Undeveloped 2000-2002 Deetman, Louis J. F. 1.027 Undeveloped Deetman. Helena C. 2000 Deetman, Louis J. F. 1.027 Undeveloped 1992-2000 Deetman, Louis .1, F. 1.027 Undeveloped Deetman, Helena C. 1992 T G Exchange, Inc. 1.027 Undeveloped 1992 Meyer, 1Valtraud 1.027 ' Undeveloped 1991-1992 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1.027 Undeveloped 1991 L027 Acres from TMMK (3) 2-4-008:014 1990-1991 HSC, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped 1990 Chialci Matsuo 180.812 Undeveloped 1986-1990 Auto Import of Hawaii, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped 2271_3 18 Myounghee Noh &Associates,LL.C. • CON OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TPM(3)2-4-0011168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii Period Area Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee Primary Use (approx.) (acres) Sicgti' d Kagawa (iLK. Inc. Katco. Inc. I9,ti6 Kiuons, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped .1T Trading Co.. Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. 1982-1986 Kukuau Development Corporal ion 180.812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to 'FMK (3) 2-4-008:026 1982 0.361 acres from TNIK (3) 2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.902 Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco. Inc. K tsai's. Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped JT Tract n�� •Co.. Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches. Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegired Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco. Inc. Kasons, Inc. 1980 John Straiton Tolmie_ 37,.235 Undeveloped Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust 1978-1980 Fay Linger 373.2;5 Undeveloped Robert Richardson Trust Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd. Robert Richardson • 1951-1978 Julius Richardson Trust 373..?35 Undeveloped Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard 1951 34.170 acres to T1:IK (3)2-4-008:015 1951 Akana Richardson Estate 407.405 Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co.. Ltd. TIM (3) 2-4-073:010; Kukuan Street, 1-lilo Adjoining property to the Southwest 2015-Present Ching. Creighton Lowell Trust 1.002 Undeveloped 1991-2015 Ching, Creighton L. 1.002 Undeveloped 1991 Sunrise Estates joint Venture 1.002 Undeveloped 1991 1.002 Acres from Ti11'K (3) 2-4-008:014 1990-1991 I-ISC, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki Matsu() 180.812 Undeveloped 2271_3 19 Myounghee Noh &Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:163. Hilo, Island of Hawaii Period Area ( oner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee Primary Use (approx.) (acres) 1986-1990 Auto Import of Hawaii. Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped Siegl)red Kagawa • G LK. Inc. Katco. Inc. 1986 Kasons, Inc. 180.812 Uncle\eloped in- Trading Co.. Lid. Auto Imports of lawaii. Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. 1982-1986 K.ukuau Development Corporation 180.812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK (3) 2-44)08:026 1982 0.361 acres from TIVIK (3) 2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.902 SieL,fied Kagawa GE I' C. iii. Kate°1, Inc. KasOns,lnC. 1980-1982 1T Trading Co.. Ltd. 373.235 Undeveloped Auto Imports of Hawaii. Inc. Farms & Ranches. Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Slegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. Kasons, Inc. 1980 John Stratton Tolnaie 373.235 Undeveloped Auto Imports of Hawn ii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust 19;8-1980 hay Linger 373.235 Undeveloped Robert Richardson Trust Hawaiian Trust Co.. Ltd. Robert Richardson 1931-1978 luaus Richardson Trust 373.235 Undeveloped • Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard 1951 34.170 acres to TMK (3)2-4-008:015 1951 Akana Richardson Estate 407.405 Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co., Ltd. 'TMK (3) 2-4-001:122; .Komohana Street, Hilo Adjoining property to the South 2001-Present State of Hawaii 267.030 Undeveloped 30.000 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-:001:169 1.42 acres to 'FMK (3) 2-4-001:170 2001 Area revised to 323.470 acres 17.77 acres from TNII{ (3) 2-4-001:012 4.594 acres to TMK(3)2-4-001:171 2271_3 20 Myounghee Noh &Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii Period Area (approx.) Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee (acres) Primary Use 2000-2001 State oil lawaii 281.174 Undeveloped 2000 30.396 acres to "1':1K (3) 2-4-001:168 7.118 acres dropped into a road 1979-1999 State oil lawaii 318.668 Undeveloped 1979 0.517 acres to `1 \1 K (3) 2-4-001:166 1968-1979 State of I lawaii 319.205 Undeveloped 1968 319.205 acres from TM K (3) 2-4-001:041 1967-1968 Statof Hawaii 499.827 Undeveloped 0.493 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-001:119 1967 8.588 acres dropped into a road 6.199 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-024:072 1.667 acres dropped into a road I965-1967 State of Hawaii 516.774 I Undeveloped 6.621 acres to TM K (3) 2-4-024:024 1965 6.021 acres to 'FMK (3) 2-4-001:019 1.2 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:023 1.500 acres from Lanikaula Street 1950-1965 State of Hawaii 526.716 Undeveloped 1960 10.205 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-023:131 19.095 acres to 'FMK (3) 2-4-024:148 1949-1950 State of Hawaii 556.016 Undeveloped 46.344 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-023:053 30.950 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:027 .13.640 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:038 1949 1.880 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:042 50.000 acres from TMK(3) 2-4-001:039 7.313 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:049 0.313 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-001:052 1949 State of Hawaii 498.890 Undeveloped TMK- Tax Map Key 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION User provided information was obtained by having a representative of the County (future landowner and manager of the subject property), Alan Rudo with the COH O.HCD, complete a "User Questionnaire- administered by NINA. The information in the following sections was obtained from the questionnaire. 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS iVlr. Ruclo was unaware of any environmental cleanup liens or use limitations for the subject property. 2271_3 21 Myounghee Noh &Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii 3.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE Mr. Rudo was unaware of any past releases• specific chemicals, spills or other chemical releases. or environmental cleanups that have taken place at the subject property. Mr. Rudo was not aware of any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the subject property. 3.3 VALUATION REDUCTION The land is being transferred under the Governor's Executive Order, from the State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) to the• COl-1 OHCD. There will be no financial transaction. 3.4 REASON FOR PERFORMING THE PHASE I ESA • The purpose of'this Phase 1 ESA is to identify any recognized environmental condition.~ at the subject property, within the scope n f ASTM Standard 1527-13 for due diligence related to the potential transfer of property ownership from. DLNR to COl-1 OHCD and for lease to a non-profit organization for development of senior housing,. 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW Under ASTM 1527-13, records are to be reviewed by the environmental professional who may help identify RECs in connection with the subject property. 4.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES NINA used Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), to search standard federal and state government databases for hazardous substance or petroleum product releases that could impact the subject property. A copy of the EDR report is provided in Appendix A. ASTM.E 1527-113 specifies a minimum search distance for specific environmental record sources. The following sources are specified for incidents or sites within one mile of the subject property: • Federal NPL site list e Federal R ,.RA RRA T TSD facilities list C CO C S • State Sites of interest The following sources are specified for incidents or sites within %a mile of the subiect property: o Federal Delisted NPL site list • Federal CERCUS list • Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list • Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list • State Brownfield Sites • State Hazardous Waste Sites • State landfill and/or solid waste disposal site list • State leaking UST Iist • State voluntary cleanup program sites The following sources are for incidents on the subject and adjoining properties: 2271_3 22 Myounghee Noh&Associates,L.L.C. 00H OFICD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3j 2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii • Federal RCRAgenerators list a State registered UST list Finally, the following are for incidents for the subject property: • Federal rRvS list • Federal Institutional Controls(IC) and Engineering (EC) Registries • Stab IC and LC Registries • State releases list 4 The following subsections summarize the results of the [DR records review for the datasets listed above (Environmental Data Resources_ Inc., 2016). 4.1.1 Federal National Priorities List The NPL, maintained by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is a list of highly contaminated sites that have been identified by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986. There were no NPL sites id.enti(ied within one mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.2 Federal RCRA CORRACTS TSD Facilities List The RCRA CORRACTS TSD facilities list maintained by the EPA contains generators, transporters, treaters, storers, and disposers of hazardous waste that have reported violations and are subject to corrective actions. No RCRA CORRACTS TSD facilities were identified within one.mile of the subject property (Environmental Data :Resources,Inc.,2016). 4.1.3 Delisted NPL Site List This site list, maintained by the EPA, contains delisted NPL sites. No delisted NPL sites were identified within V2 mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.4 Federal CERCLIS List The CERCLIS list, maintained by the EPA, contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the NPL list, as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. No federal CERCLIS sites were identified within V. mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 20116). 4.1.5 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP Site List The CERCLIS NFRAP list, maintained by the EPA, contains designated CERCLA sites that, to the best of the EPA's knowledge, assessment has been completed and has determined that no further steps will be taken to list the sites cin the NPL. No CERCLIS NFRAP sites were identified *within 3 mile of the subject property the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 227'1_3 23 fvlyounghee Noh &Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii 4.1.6 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities List • The RCRA non-CORRAC:TS TSD facilities list, maintained by the EPA, contains RCRA permitted facilities that treat. store. or dispose of hazardous waste. No RCRA TSD facilities listed were identified within `rz mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc.. 2016). 4.1.7 State Brownfield Sites The. State Brownfield Sites database. maintained by the HDOH HEER Orrice, is an inventory of state designated brownfield sites. Under the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act, a brownfield is defined as "real property. the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse Of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of'a hazardous substance, pollutant,or contaminant.'- The EPA provides grants and loans to state and local governments for the assessment, cleanup, and redevelopment of these properties. Properties located on the state brownfield list may have received federal funding under this program or be designated a . brownfield for state administration or funding purposes. No state brownlield sites were identified within 1/2 mile of the subject property(Environmental Data Resources, Inc.. 2016). 4.1.8 State Hazardous Waste Sites The State I-Iazardous Waste Sites records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by responsible parties. No state hazardous waste sites were identified within 1 mile of .the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). One state hazardous waste site was identified at greater than '/2 mile,at 600 Wailoa Street, located just over 3/4 mile east northeast and downgradient from the subject property. The site, Lanakila Homes Phase 3B.-4 was identified as having'heavy metal lead soil contamination that was managed with controls. Another state hazardous waste site was identified at a non-geocoded location on Kaumana Drive. The site, identified as HELCO Pole-Mounted Transformer No. 20938 at Pole No. 7 was identified as having total petroleum hydrocarbons at levels lower than 50 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), and was issued a No Further Action (NFA) letter on 05 June 2012. The closest location of Kaumana Drive in proximity of the subject property is 1/4 mile upgradient. Please refer to Section 8.2 for determination of impact of these sites on the subject property. 4.1.9 State Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites , The HDOH records contain an inventory of permitted landfills in the State of Hawaii. No permitted solid waste landfills, incinerators, or transfer stations were identified within 'l mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.10 State LUST List The state LUST list, maintained by the EtDO1-1 Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch (SHWB), maintains an inventory of sites withLUSTs. EDR identified no LUST facilities within 11/2 mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 227 E_3 21,1 Myounghee Noh&Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TPM(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii 4.1.11 State Voluntary Cleanup Sites The state voluntary cleanup sites list, maintained by the I-IDO1-i HEER Office. contains sites participating in the state's Voluntary Response Program (VRP). No facilities participating in the state VRP were identified within Y2 mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.12 Federal RCRA Generators List The RCRA Generators list, maintained by the EPA, contains small and large quantity generators of RCRA hazardous waste. The determination of generator size is used to establish the risk that the (kiln), poses to public health and the environment and consequently, the amount of regulation and reporting required. Large Quantity Generators (LQG) are facilities that generate more than a 1,000 kg/month of hazardous waste and/or more than I kg/month of acute hazardous waste. Small Quantity Generators(SQG) are facilities that generate less than 1,000 kg/month but more than 100 kg/month of hazardous waste and/or less than 1 kg/month of acute hazardous waste. Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG) are facilities that generate less than • 100 kg/month of hazardous waste and/or less than 1 kg/month of acute hazardous waste. The EPA also maintains the RCRA NLR list. This list contains facilities that were once on the RCRA generators list, but are no longer in business, no longer in business at the listed address, or are no longer generating hazardous waste substances in quantities that require reporting. No SQG,.LQG. or CESQG were identified on the subject or adjoining properties (Environmental Data Resources, inc., 2016). 4.1.13 State Registered UST List The HDO1-I SHWB maintains a database of known UST. EDR identified no UST facilities within 1A, mile of the subject Property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.14 Federal ICs and ECs Registries • Federal ICs and ECs sites are federally listed sites that are required to implement institutional controls or engineering controls. Because the sites may continue to be impacted by past use, future use of the property may be restricted in order to protect human health and the environment. Land use controls can be either ICs or_ECs. Institutional controls are limitations on how the property may be used such as limiting use to industrial activities. Engineering controls are physical structures or devices located on the property that contain_ or limit exposure to contamination. Engineering controls need to be Maintained or protected to be effective. No Federal 1Cs or ECs were identified within one mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.15 State ICs and ECs Registries • These sites are state listed sites that have either state-required institutional controls or engineering controls in place. Because the sites may continue to be impacted by past use, future use of the property may be restricted in order to protect human health and the environment. Land Use Controls cant be either ICs or ECs. 1C.s are limitations on how the property may be used such as limiting use to industrial activities. ECs are physical structures or devices located on the property that contain or limit exposure to Contamination. ECs need to be maintained or protected to be 2271_3 25 Myounghee Noh&Associates,L.L.C. OCH OFICD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii e Free(i ye. No State IC or EC were identified within one mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources. Inc.. 2016). 4.1.16 Federal ERNS List The ERNS list, maintained by the EPA. contains CERCLA hazardous substance releases or spills. as maintained at the National Response Center. No incidents were identified on the subject property (Environmental Data Resources. Inc., 2016). 4.1.17 State Releases List The [MOH HEER Office maintains a database of known releases to the environment or hazardous material or petroleum products. No release incidents were identified within 'A mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.18 U.S. Brownfields U.S. Browntields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. No U.S. Brownfields Sites were identified within one mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.2 ADDITIONAL RECORD SOURCES • 114NA reviewed additional environmental records as needed and available. Additional record sources filed by the HDOFI SHWB were requested. MNA reviewed HDOH HEER Office online records for the subject and adjoining properties, and an Environmental Assessment that was completed in 2009 for the subject property. 4.2.1 Subject Property MNA requested records for review from the HDOH &FMB on 12 October 2016 and FIFD on 13 October 2016. FIDOT-1 SHWB and HFD responded that they had no records 011 file for the subject property. MNA reviewed publicly available information posted on the HDOH HEER Office website, http://eha-web.doh.has,vaii.gov/eha-cma/Leaders/HEER/public-records,and found that the subject property was not listed on the flEER Sites of Interest Lookup Spreadsheet or the HEER Emergency Response Lookup Spreadsheet.. MNA reviewed the HDOH Environmental Health Warehouse . (http://eha-web.doh.hawaii.goviehwl), and found that there were no sites of interest shown on the subject property. MNA reviewed the Final Environmental Assessment joy Fire Administration Support Complex, Waialcea, South Island of Hawaii, TAM (3) 24-001;176 & 178 (Previously Parcel 168 1-portion1),dated June 2009, which made no mention-of hazardous materials or petroleum products at the subject property(M&.E Pacific, inc., 2009). 4.2.2 Surrounding Properties MNA requested records for review from the HDOH SHWB on 12 October 2016 and HFD on 13 October 2016. HDOB SHWB and FWD responded that they had no records on file :for the adjoining properties. 2271_3 26 MyOtinghee Nph &Associates,L.L.C. COH 01-ICD—Phase i Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii NINA reviewed publicly available information posted on the 1-IDC l-1 I-lEER Office wcbsite. hup:iicha-web.doh.hawaii.goy=eha-cma Leaders/ ll_:ERipublic-records, and found that the adjoining properties were not listed on the NEER Sites of Interest Lookup Spreadsheet or the I-{EER Emergency Response Lookup Spreadsheet. NINA reviewed the L{DO1-I Environmental Health Warehouse (http:'ieha-web.doh.hawaii.go ''ehwt). and found that there were no sites of. imerest shown on the adjoining properties. MN A reviewed the (-ictal Environmental Assessment liir Fire Administration .Support Complex, 11au/kea, South Hilo. Island of Hawaii, TiVIK (3) 2--I-OW:176 c 17S (Previrtslt• Parcel 168 [portion]). dated June 2009, which made no mention of hazardous materials or petroleum products at the adjoining property to the east (M&E Pacific, Inc., 2009). The proposed .Fire Administration Support Complex would include administration, dispatch, and preparation/training buildings, warehouse, Hire station, museum, open and covered training areas, site infrastructure, and paved access and parking areas. The use would include all operations and trainings. Please refer to Section 8.2 for determination of impact of these sites on.the subject property. 4.3 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY MNA reviewed historical use information for the subject property, including aerial photographs and United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps. No lire insurance maps were available. 4.3.1 Historical Aerial Photographs Aerial photographs of the subject, adjoining, and surrounding properties were provided by EDR (Environmental Data Resources, Inc.,2016), Photographs from the years 1954, 1975, 1977, 1985, 1992, and 2000 were reviewed. Table 4 provides the details for those photos. Table 4.. Aerial Photograph Details Date - Image Type Approximate Scale 2000 C; 1992 C 1985 C 1'':500' 1977 BAY 1975 C 1954 BAHT 131W-Black and white photograph C-Color For the reviewed aerial photographs, the following observations were made: 1954: No building structures were visible on the subject and adjoining properties. The surrounding area was undeveloped and covered in vegetation. No roads were observable on the map in the area surrounding the subject property. A few building structures were observed approximately 1,500 feet northeast of the subject property. 1975: No building structures were visible on the subject and adjoining properties. The surrounding area was undeveloped and covered in vegetation. Roadways were evident to the northeast of the subject property, with the alignment of the current day Komohana and Kulkunu Streets. More buildings were observed approximately 1,000-1,500 feet northeast of the subject property. 2271_3 27 Myounghee Noh &Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TIVIK(3)2-4-081:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii 197.7: No change from the 1975 photo. except that a roadway with the alignment of current day Mohouli Street is evident. 1955: The development to the northeast has crown, with structures now present on the west side of Komohana Street, within 1.000 feet of the subject property. A structure and possibly agricultural fields are depicted north of(on the opposite side of) Kukuau Street. Apparent residential development is visible approximately 2.000 feet to the northwest of the subject property. 1992: No change from the .955 photo. 2000: Residential development to the northeast and southwest has increased to within 500 feet of the subject property in both directions along Kukuau Street. MNA reviewed historical aerial imagery available on Google Earth. Photographs from the years 2000, 2010, 2011,2012, 2013, and 2014 were reviewed. For the reviewed aerial photographs, the following observations were made: 2000:" No building structures were visible on the subject and adjoining properties east, south, and west. The surrounding area was undeveloped and covered in vegetation. Residential structures on the adjoining properties to the north were evident. 2010: No building structures were visible on the subject and adjoining properties to the east and south. Increased residential development is visible to the north and west, along Kukuau Street. 2011: Two photos were available for 2011, from March and June, both under moderate cloud cover. No change from the 2010 photo. 2012: Four photos were available for 2012, from May, June, November, and December. One change is evident on TMK (2) 2-4-001:177,to the east of the subject property. The'parcel was graded and active construction/development is evident in the photos. 2013: Two photos were available for 2013, from January and April. No change from the 2012 photo is shown in the January photo. The April photo was taken under thick cloud cover, and the subject property and surrounding area are not visible. 2014: Six photos were available for 2014, from August. Two of the photos were taken under thick cloud cover, and subject property and surrounding area are not visible. In the other four photos, development at parcel 177 appears to be nearing completion. The development.is the Mohouli Elderly Care Facility. 4.3.2 Historical Topographic Maps USGS topographic maps that cover the subject property and vicinity were reviewed. Maps were available for the years 1917, 1932, 1963, 1951. 1995, and 2013 (Environmental Data Resources, Inc.,201.6). A copy of the historical topographic maps provided by EDR is included in Appendix A. The maps of the subject property and surrounding area depicted the following: 1917: The subject property was depicted to lie within the lava flow of 1381. No structures are depicted on the subject property or in the surrounding -area: l4i:10 town is visible, 2271_3 28 -Mtyounghee Noh&Associates,L.L.C.' CpH OHCO—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-1-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii approximately 1.5 miles northeast. A railroad is shown approximately 1 .5 miles to the south of the subject property. 1932: No change at the subject property or surrounding area from the 1917 map. 1963: More buildings structures were obser\ed w ithm ',Y mile of the subject property to the east. The railroad south of the subject property is no longer present: instead there is residential development in this area. 1981: No change at the subject property or surrounding area from the 1963 map. 1995: Kukuau Street is depicted extending laterally north of the subject property. Multiple scattered structures are present north and west of the subject property. 2013: No significant changes at the subject property or surrounding area front the 1995 except that Mohotili Street is depicted and borders the subject property to the south. 4.3.3 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map No Sanborn Fire Insurance maps were available for the subject property. 2271_3 29 Myounghee Noh&Associates, v / II Subje Pro erty 8.' dary :�r `x.,I . .r'. ♦ ♦ ♦ y ' • • ♦ • • • y♦ • ♦ ♦ I `� • •• •• •• • • • • • •f , • • • 14 * *4 , 4 . 4 ♦ • , • • • ,', , ♦ ♦ • /0*At •1• • • • • • , , • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • ♦ • • • •ai • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . t• we, , Props BAST . • I , l . . * j • , 1• •t* • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • *#* • s•0` • • • ♦ ♦ ♦ • . + . • • , • . • ♦ • • , • • • ^/) • •1b • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • lee* > • ♦ , • • • , • • • • • , • • • • • • ♦ ♦ • • lr e a F•r 4000 • • • • • • •'O • • • •1 • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ ..•*•••,,,,...,,„ - • ♦ • 111•• ♦ • • • + • • , . + • $ • + • • •• e• • ♦ ♦ •`• ♦ ♦ ♦ • • ♦ ♦ ♦ ••• • • • Monow Slee _ •r . • ♦ • ♦ s ♦ 4t. _ ,a W=^ .Start Scale ,. 10E— t?7 i Figure 3. Site Map — — — Path Walked WTT'= Water drainage Phase I Environmental Site Assessment • • • TMK (3)2-4-001.168 61 • ♦ • Thick Vegetation Mohouli Street. Hilo, Hawaii s • • Myounghee Noh 8 MNA Project No.2271__3 Associates,L.L.C. • Tran'fiorrn::r P,_,I� Page 30 COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TPM(3)2-4-001:163. Hilo. Island of Hawaii • 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE The site reconnaissance \vas conducted by Phillip Cabanila and 1-lerbertson Santos of MNA on 06 December 2016. The site reconnaissance focused on identifying recognized environmer7n.rl cmmclitions with the ability to impact the subject property. A site map of the subject property is presented in Figure 3. 5.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS The site reconnaissance \Vas conducted by visually inspecting the subject property and adjoining properties on loot. MNA looked for a variety of environmental hazard indicators including..but not limited to,stained surface soil, dead or stressed vegetation, hazardous substances, aboveground and underground storage tanks, disposal areas, groundwater wells, dry\vells, and sumps. Inspection of wastewater system or building materials,was not part of this assessment. Figure 3 presents the path walked. Photographs from the site reconnaissance are presented in Appendix B. 5.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING The subject property is located in the town of Hilo, uphill towards the Kaumana area, on the north side of Mohouli Street, \vest of Komohana Street and east of Kukuau Street (Photograph 1). The immediate surroundings of the subject property are residential and agricultural properties. The subject property was adjoined on the. north and west by residential properties and was adjoined on • the east by forest land owned by the State of Hawaii. Mohouli Street runs along the southern border of the subject property. 5.3 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS At the time of the site reconnaissance, there were no structures observed on the subject property. No transformers were observed on the subject or adjoining properties. The subject property was observed to be undeveloped land with thick vegetation (Photographs 1-7). Along the Mohouli Street, three storm water drainages were observed. The drainages were indicated by yellow markers placed directly to the east of each runoff drain area (Photographs 3- 4). NINA personnel observed the runoff areas were constructed using asphalt and concrete, with a metal grate covering the drainage (Photograph 4). At the time of the site reconnaissance, no standing surface water was observed around or within the runoff access areas. Trails cut through the vegetation were previously cut along the east and wet boundaries of the subject property (Photographs 6-7 and 11). These were utilized as access points by MNA personnel to observe the northeast and northwest corners of the subject property. The property corners were marked with survey stakes and flagging tape (Photographs 1-2, 8-9, and 12). The adjoining property to the cast of the subject property was undeveloped land, with thick vegetation,similar to the subject property(Photograph 14). Residential properties to the north and west of the subject property \were observed (Photograph 15). No RECs were identified on the adjoining properties. 5.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS No structures were observed on the subject property; therefore, no interior observations were warranted. 2271_3 31 Nlyounghee.Noh&Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii 5.5 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS Hazardous substances and petroleum products were not observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. Small amounts of household debris were observed on the southern boundary of the subject property (Photograph 5). 5.6 ABOVE GROUND AND UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS One above-Lground storage tank (AST)containing propane was observed on parcel (2) 2-4-073:008. to the west of the subject property. The AST was observed to be in good condition (Photograph 13)_ with no stressed vegetation. MNA did not observe any indications of underground storage tanks (USTs) or ASTs or associated accessories, such as vent pipes, fill ports, or dispensers, on the subject property. 6.0 INTERVIEWS (MINA interviewed Gordon C. Heit. the District Land Agent with the State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources Land Division, the agency responsible for managing the subject property. The interview was administered by Jessica Walsh of MNA, via email. NINA attempted to interview the Hilo Police Department, but they said that they did not have the time to comply • with the request. During the site reconnaissance,MNA attempted to interview those present at the residential adjoining properties, but no one was available at the time. MNA called the County of I-Iawaii Department of Public Works for an interview, but they had not returned the phone call at the time of this writing. 6.1 Gordon C. Heit, DLNR • On 03 November 20.16 MNA interviewed Gordon Heit. Mr.Reit is the current District Land Agent with the State of Hawaii DLNR. The State of Hawaii is the owner of the subject property. He indicated that he didn't know of any specific chemicals present or once present at the subject property. Mr. 1-feit stated that the adjoining property to the east, parcel 176, is under Executive Order 4223 to the County of Hawaii for public safety and related purposes. An Environmental Assessment was completed by the County of Hawaii Fire Department as a requirement to the issuance of Executive Order 4223. Mr. Heit indicated that he had no knowledge of any spills, chemical releases, environmental cleanups, environmental cleanup liens, engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls at the site. 7.0 DATA GAPS AND DEVIATIONS MNA encountered a data wap during this Phase I ESA; MNA was unable to thoroughly inspect the ground surface and much of the interior of the subject property due to the presence of dense vegetation. There were no indications of illegal dumping, except (ora few small trashes (Photograph 5), and therefore this is considered a minor data gap, as it is not anticipated that illegal dumpsites are hidden by the vegetation. There were no deviations from the Standard Practicefir Environmental Site Assessments: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM International,2013). 2271_3 32 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCO—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:162. Hilo. Island of Hawaii 8.0 KEY FINDINGS AND OPINION This section evaluates the key findings of this assessment and makes a determination as to the presence RECs, if any. 8.1 Subject Property No records of NPL sites, Federal RCRA CORRACTS and Non-CORRACTS Treatment Storage Disposal Facilities. Delisted National Priority List sites. Federal or state CERCLIS sites. Federal CERC LIS NFRAP sites, landfill or solid waste disposal sites, State Leaking Underground Storage Tank List sites. State Voluntary Cleanup sites. Federal RCRA Generator sites. State registered UST sties. Institutional Controls/Engineering Controls registries, Federal ERNS list sites, Federal or State Brown fields sites were identified at the subject property. Information provided as part of the interview conducted or user questionnaire did not indicate any •RECs. No recognized environmental conditions were identified on the subject property based on the historic aerial photograph or topographic map review. During the site reconnaissance. MNA observed no indication of R.EC. 8.2 Surrounding Area No records of NPL sites, Federal RCRA CORRACTS and Non-COR.RACTS Treatment Storage Disposal Facilities, Delisted National Priority List sites, Federal CERCLIS sites, Federal CERCLIS NFRAP sites. landfill or solid waste disposal sites, State Leaking Underground Storage Tank List sites, State Voluntary Cleanup sites, Federal RCRA Generator sites, State registered UST sties, Institutional Controls/Engineering Controls registries, Federal ERNS list sites, Federal or State Brownfelds sites were identified in the area surrounding the subject property. Information provided as part of the interview conducted or user questionnaire did not indicate any RECs. No recognized environmental conditions were identified in the surrounding area based on historic aerial photograph or topographic map.review. 8.2.1 Non- REC During the site reconnaissance, MNA observed one propane aboveground storage tank (AST) located on the adjoining property to the west, TMK. (2) 2-4-073:003. The AST was in good condition, and there was no stressed vegetation. Therefore, the AST is not considered a REC. EDR identified two hazardous waste sites located 1/4 mile away from the subject property: 600 Wailoa Street. Located'/.i mile and downgradient from the subject property was the Lanakila Homes Phase 3B-4 site. The site was identified as having heavy metal and lead contaminated soils present,and managed with controls. Due to the distance and proximity of this site from the subject property, it is not considered a.REC. Non-Geocoded Location on Kaumana Drive. The 1-IELCO Pole-Mounted Transformer No. 2093$ at Pole No. 7 was identified as having petroleum contamination in the soil. The contaminated soil was removed, and a No Further Action letter was issued on 05 June 2012. Due to the distance of this site from the subject property, this is not considered a REC. MNA reviewed the Final Environmental Assessment for Fire Administration Support Complex, Waiakeca, South Hila, Island of Hawaii, TMK (3) 2-4-001:176 178. (Previously .Parcel 168 2271_3 33 Myounghee Noh &Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168. Hilo. Island of Hawaii [partirniJ), dated June 2009, which made no mention of hazardous materials or petroleum products at the adjoining property to the east (M&F Pacific. inc.. 2009). The proposed l=ire Administration Support Complex would include administration, dispatch. and preparation/training buildings, warehouse, fire station, museum. open and covered training areas, site infrastructure. and paved access and parking areas. The use would include all operations and trainings. While the LA conditionor impact construction or use of the facility related to indicated no existing unl.act from tea(. c.( 1. a , hazardous materials or petroleum products that could impact the subject property. MNA notes that should the liicility be constructed and used as outlined in the LA. mock lire training including staging fires of burning materials and associated suppression techniques could ulapiiCt air quality in the immediate vicinity of the facility. including the subject property. 9.0 CONCLUSION tMNA performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and I limitations of ASTM L 1527-13 of the subject property identified as TMK(3)2-4-001.168 in Hilo, Island of Hawaii. Any exceptions to. or deletions from, this practice are described ill Section 7.0 of this report. This assessment has not revealed evidence of recognized environmental conditions based on existing conditions at the time of this Phase I site assessment; however, should the Fire Administration Support Complex be constructed on the adjoining property to the east and used as outlined in the LA, mock fire training including staging fires of burning materials and associated suppression techniques could impact air quality in the immediate vicinity of the facility, including the subject property. 2271_3 34 Myounghee Noh&Associates,L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -FMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo. Island of Hawaii REFERENCES ASTM International. (2013). Standard Practice fir Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental SiteAssessnrent Process. West Conshohocken: ASTM International. Environmental Data Resources. Inc. (2016, October 2). /irstScarch Report fnr COiI OI/CI.:) illuhouli P111. Shelton: Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Retrieved May 20. 2013, from Web Soil Survey: http::,/weh oilsurvev.nres.usda.govlapp,'FlomePagc.htm Federal Emergency Management Agency. ( 1988. 09 16). FE:11AI Flood ; /op Service Center. Retrieved June 3. 2016, from https:iimse.lema.gov/portal I lawvaii Department of'Health Safe Drinking Water Branch. (2014,November). U/C Map v1.Oa1111. Retrieved May 19, 2016, from Underground injection Control (UIC) Program: h ttp:/Ihawa i i.gov/h ea l thlenv i ro nmenta l/wwatcrlsdw b/u i s/pd ff oa hu i c.pd f Hazlett, R. W., & I-lyndman, D. W. (1996). Roadside Geology of Hauvai'i_ Missoula, Montana: Montana Press Pubishing Company. M&E Pacific, Inc. (2009). Final Lnvhronmental Assessment for Fire tldministration Support Complex, Waiakea, South Milo, Island of Hawaii, TMVIK(3)2-4-001:176 c 178(Previously Parcel 168[portion]). Honolulu: County olHawaii Department of Public works Building Division. MacDonald, G. A:, & Abott, A. T. (1996). Volcanoes in the Sea. Honolulu: Univeristy of Hawaii Press. Mink, J. F., & Lau, L. S. (1990). Aquifer Identification and ClassifIcation for Hawaii: Groundwater Protection Strategy.for Ilmvai'i. University of Hawaii, Water Resources Research Center. Morgan, J. (1996). I-lawai'i:A Unique Geography. Honolulu: The Bess Press, inc. Stearns, H. T. (1985). Geology of the State of Hawaii. Palo Alto: Pacific Books, United States Department o.f Agriculture. (2016). Natural Resources Conservation Service. Retrieved October 19, 2016, From Web Soil Survey: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/H.omePage.htm Wolfe,E.W. &Morris,J. (1996). Geologic Map ofthe Island of Hawaii. Washington, D.C.: United States Geological Survey. 2271_3 35 Myounghee Noh &Associates,L.L.C. Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Rousing Project Draft Environmental Assessment APPENDIX 5 Market Study Preliminary Findings (This page intentionally left blank] Colliers INTERNATIONAL PRIONIMIIPOR Residential Rental Demand Study Hale Ola 0 Mohouli, Hilo, HI PRELIMINARY FINDINGS Prepared far: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Prepared by: COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL HAWAII 220 S. King Street Suite 1800 Honolulu, HI 96813 808.524.2666 lanoary 15, 2021. • Colliers SUMMARY OF FINDINGS INTERNATIONAL j \,L LA. L In order to determine the demand for residential rentals, we analyzed the potential trade area that the target market or renters would likely come from. We then analyzed the demographics of households in this trade as well as the existing rental inventory to estimate the potential demand for additional rental units for the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli project (the "Property") in Hilo. TARGET TRADE AREA Colliers identified the primary trade area as the City of Hilo where the Property is located. While there is likely enough demand within the primary trade area, we also examined secondary trade areas just outside of Hilo.Theses trade areas extended north to Pepeekeo and south to Kurtistown. Secondary H J • u Primary, � Secondary r \ Colliers 1 SUMMARY CSF FINDINGS 7IQNA __ _ ra mi 0 gaol 4 . The target market for Hale Ole 0 Mohouli are low-income family and elderly households. We examined the State affordable housing inventory in the trades areas as of October 2020. While this inventory includes apartment projects over 15 units for low-income residents (30% to 60% AMI), there may also be individual-owned properties under Section 8 which are not accounted for in our supply analysis. These projects have no vacancies with waiting lists as long as seven years. There are 1,001 low-income housing units in the primary trade area and an additional 264 in the secondary trade area. Elderly units account for about' 38% of these units. One-bedroom and two- bedroom units make up nearly 80%of the total units. AFFORDABLE HOUSING INV_EN T'QRY_ I ._! project T-- Location Units Type 1' Studios 1BR' ^TT�2BR 3BR 4BR+- PRIMARY TRADEAREA Haili Elderly Hilo 36 E 0 36 0 0 0 Kamana Elderly Hilo 62 E 0 61 0 0 0 Kinoole Senior Residences Hilo 30 E 0 30 0 0 0 Mohouli HtsSenior Hilo 182 E 0 182 0 0 0 I HaleOlaloa Hilo 50 E(PH) 20 30 0 0 0 Pomaikai Homes Hilo 20 E(PH) 10 10 0 0 0 E Komo Mai Hilo 45 F 0 35 10 0 0 HaleHoaloha Hilo 81 F 0 12 30 30 9 Hale Ulu Hoi-Laukapu Hilo 18 F 0 18 0 0 0 Hilo MaileTerrace Hilo 24 F 0 0 18 6 0 Hilo Val Hata Hilo 103 F 0 32 71 0 0 Lanakila Homes Hilo 190 F 0 16 78 82 14 Lincoln Courtside Hilo 36 F 0 0 36 0 0 RiversideApts Hilo 74 F 0 12 56 6 0 KauhaleO'Hanakahi Hilo 20 F(PH) PunaheleHomes Hilo 30 F(PH) 0 0 30 0 0 Total 1,001 30 474 329 124 23 3.0% 47.4% 32.9% 12.4% 2.3% Total Elderly 380 30 349 0 0 0 Total Family 621 0 125 329 124 23 SECONDARY TRADE AREA Lokahi Ka'u Honokaa 40 E 24 16 0 0 0 Kulaimano Elderly Hsg Pepeekeo 50 E 0 50 0 0 0 KauhaleOlu Pepeekeo 124 F 0 73 26 26 0 Weinberg Kea'au Elderly Keeau 20 E 0 19 1 0 0 Hale Aloha 0Puna Keeau 30 E(PH) 1 18 12 0 0 0 Total 264 42 170 27 26 0 15.9% 64.4% 10.2% 9.8% 0,0% Total Elderly 140 42 97 1 0 0 Total Family 124 0 73 26 26 0 TOTAL 1,265 72 644 356 150 23 5.7% 30.9% 28.1% 11.9% 1.8% R \ I Colliers SUMMARY OF FINDINGS t tTERNATICH AL 3o� _ Colliers used the 202 Hawaii County HUD income guidelines for housing to assess which households could be considered renters versus homeowners. based on an area median income ("AMI") of $75,200, a household with 100%AMI can afford to pay about $1,752 per month in housing expense which is equivalent to a mortgage payment (plus property taxes, insurance, and maintenance fees) for a $228,000 home with a 5% down payment and a 3.0% interest rate. The median condo price for South Hilo was $169,000 as of November 2020. This price can fluctuate due to limited inventory being sold. Households with incomes of 70% of AMI and higher would be able to afford a home at this price. In general, households with incomes below this threshold would be considered renters. However, one of the hurdles to home ownership among island residents is • the large down payment needed for Hawaii's high cost housing market. Thus, households in this income bracket and higher could also be considered in the rental pool. The target households with AMI below 60% would be considered renters. There are approximately 6,350 households in the primary trade area in this category and an additional 1,530 in the secondary trade area. An analysis of the senior/elderly population is provided on the next page. TRADE.AREA HOUSING AFFORDABILITY Percent-of HUD AMI i $75,200 ' Below 30% . 30%to 60% 60%to 80% 1 80%to 100% TOTAL Below 60% _ Annual HH Income 1,Tess then$4600j $2.2.1s00to$45,1100 �5,100to$60,20. $60 20.0 th$75,200 -- -- - - Households(2020) Primary 3,365 2,985 1,709 1,770 6,350 Secondary 944 586 348 358 1,530 Total 4,308 3,572 2,057 2,129 7,880 Affordable Rent Guidelines(2020 Monthly Rents including utilities) OBR $438 $438 to$876 $876 to$1,168 $1,168 to$1,460 $438 to$876 1BR $469 $469 to$938 $938 to$1,251 $1,251 to$1,563 $469 to$938 2BR $562 $562 to$1,125 $1,125 to$1,500 $1,500 to$1,875 $562 to$1,125 3BR $649 $649 to$1,299 $1,299 to$1,733 $1,733 to$2,166 $649 to$1,299 Max Monthly Rent 1111111.1.11111 30%of monthly income $565 $565 to$1,128 $1,128 to$1,505 $1,505 to$1,880 Max Home Purchase Price(1) Hilo Median Condo Price(November 2020).(3):$169,000 30%of monthly income ■ $141K to$2289( $228K to$314K (t)Basel on a 30-year mortgage with a 3.00%inlet est rate with 30%of gross hcusenold income available for payment of mortgage priroipal,interest,maintenance fees.real property tax and insura,re. (2)Strxce Title Guaranty Hawaii tt 1 Colliers- . SUMMARY OF FINDINGS GS INTERNATIONAL- . Utilizing census data for household income categories by age (over 65 years), there is an estimated 1,361 elderly renter households in the primary trade areas with an additional 200 in the secondary market. By median household income, there are about 1,222 households with incomes equal to less than 60%AMI in the primary trade area,'plus 520 in the secondary trade area. ;ELDERLY POPULATION'°DEMOGRAPHICS Trade Area PRIMARY ;SECONDARY u TOTAL . . . _ IMPULATION(II11 Total 60 and over(2020) 11,705 2,068 r 13,773 60-64 3,210 3,210 65-74 6,390 1,325 7,715 75-84 3,443 380 3,823 85 and older 1,872 363 2,235 ; 1t O1i R GSYEAR$AND OLDER RENTER-OCCUPIED Total 1,361 200 1,561 1-person household • 895 121 1,016 2-or-more-person household 466 79 545 _ ..,.—__.._ _.— - Total MEM 520 ----1,742 Less than$25,000 202 329 531 $25,000 to$44,999 1,020 191 r 1,211 (1)Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census SummaryFile I Esri current and 5 year forecasts. (2) U.S.Census Bureau(2015-2019). American CommunitySuriey5-year estimates.Retrieved from <https://censusreporter.org> SUMMARY OF-FINDINGS INTERNATIONAL" 1 After accounting for existing rental inventory and vacancies, it is evident that there is existing/pent-up demand for rental housing in the trade areas. . For the primary trade area, there appears to be a a residual demand for households with less than 60% AMI of 5,349 units after accounting for the affordable housing inventor units. For the secondary trade area, there appears to be an additional shortage of 1,266 units to serve renters. Senior/Elderly demand accounts for an estimated 842 of these units in the primary trade area. Although there is a shortageof units in the trade area, it is not reasonable to assume that the Property would capture all of this demand as residents could be housed in multi-family scenarios or other Section 8 housing. Thus, we have assumed the site can capture a certain amount (capture rate) of this demand. We have assumed rather conservative capture rates considering the systemic shortage of affordable housing throughout the Big Island and the state. Based on our analysis, the total potential demand for Hale Ola 0 Mohouli is between 280 to 573 units for the primary and secondary trade areas. Of these units, the potential demand for senior housing is between 45 and 92 units. PROJECTED MARKET DEMAND eelotN 61:954A141 Elderly TOTAL ;(Renters PRIMARY MARKET Households (Demand)' 6,350 1,222 Existing Family Housing Units 621 Existing Elderly Units 380 380 Planned Inventory Units(2021-2023) 0 0 Residual Demand(HH) 5,349 842 Project Capture Rate 5.0% 267 42 7.0% 374 59 10.0% 535 84 SECONDARY MARKET Households (Demand) 1,530 520 Existing Family Housing Units 0 0 Existing Elderly Units 264 264 Planned Inventory Units(2021-2023) 0 0 Residual Demand(HH) 1,266 256 Project Capture Rate 1.0% 13 1111 2.0% 25 3.0% 38 TOTAL PROJECT DEMAkliib_.. ` 280 to 573 45 tn92 (1)Householders 65 years and older with incomes less than$45,000. (2)U.S.Census Bureau/2015-2019). American CornmunitySurvey5-yearestimotes. Retrieved from<9https://censusrepo,ter.org> 5 HAWAII ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 100 PAUAHI STREET, SUITE 204 • HILO, HAWAII 96720 ca c 6-2 c'V.I 0,, To: Planning Department -, Attn: Tracie-Lee Carnero ' From: Keith Kato Executive Director Date: November 13, 2020 Subject: TIAR —Hale Ola 0 Mohouli SLU Boundary Amendment Request Tax Map Key: 2-4-1: 168 Enclosed are 21 copies of the Traffic Impact Report for the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli affordable housing project. Please let us know if anything further is required. Planning Dept. ExhibiL_ ;4 . G f 11' AN EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY -EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER- ADMINISTRATION: (808)969-1158 FAX(808)935-6916 ., ...,,, .....„1 Cr) ran s T portation Impact Assessment Report .... Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Hilo, Hawaii • November 2020 . . - ''''—'1Wa akt.tz••• - •.#:**..iti`t,„4,.4 „,,,:".':e(W*1*.f'6 ,-. i4 1 ptokoli-0,„.,... ,,, ----- - " ----w ------------- ,,,;?,,5„' ,.1;14-,.. kaula'inarivt Island 4-......7-, '...4. ,,,, ,:^A^",!,; t , „„ ."* -r-`" -- . i:c, ,.,,,, , •,,P,,. ...-4,...1.,; ''4" .. '''' I.*, . - ,.,,,,,,i Ctoconut Island 4—, 'IA m.-A4',4 ij,- 441„4..0.4 , 04.-t-:"..-4 ''''tfts- - - tar il ,,, ,,, -I ,,,.t4,4...,....t; ,, ., 4,„,„: , „,. ,;„-..-- ‘04 ,,-. Vgi-Pt::'. 1;', "c'' , .0', ' '''','• '.'-'NeP.4";--..'s' - - ' ',.,444:'i 447 F1'9P1(?..1. 4, c( !,,,cl',:::, --7,7'..', . '.';''' -4-- .:,,,„ - .• '''..-i"-:4'61. wi„. .„ ,.*, ,:,--,. ,f1,,.1 ,, r44°'40.141 -4Ftaret:is411arfcr:-1, -.*'-'1"4-0..ti-%%;‘, 44 341 r4,4' 1.41,7,4 14„4„ 14t.'':‘.. Ii4441 Ir ' s" Ir. Ac 4r.„, Al. ,-vf 0411141 40 I LA ri'i,4,..," i. , " 'At!, •°:••• „•••-t ',...', - ,,°.•°' 14v „,,„ ,ft - -.1, 1 '.4, ',•°' - •1/44,„ ii rilvit,"Alktt,”:.,";^..^..-; 41,.,11.; •;• , -- .44 1, i- b.„' , ,,,, ... ,„,.!...,,,„,;„ N-1,031 1:74.',K14:41.004,441.',1.16,4.'1', .NN5P4,• • ' t.,,,, 14, ;:l ..cz - We' '" 4,- tr4- 410,1t4V,3..,,1,*,4,..,. it ?,,., 71-41tiktriv.•„. AIX,,,,. *, ,7%.. A...,.._ic..,..,- . tf. i.,,,,... 4014,pr4-,,,,,,',-A-14 -r-r, „e. 1'"r i, ' ;V ,T47":.;V:4;''s1.'4,441$ '',''',t, ''4,^" '..rt,"1,1 ' • it,'4,1, •' „4,Oh f,ot .0 A"%4,71/4" °•'''' fic1,1": : ...r . rept. or ,,,7z, .,,,,, ..„.f.,-, „,,,,, elk,. , ,,,,e 0,h: 1#2,,i.,, 0,... ""°-"*„, ,, „,. r:to 44414414;,1/4044‘440 ,re1f-'''- ,i4,4-,, .,..447,1;„,..,NIZIS'. '''''' '.. ''''''Or,.'. ' ,,'7•"%losi 44,,i',41 '‘1,11/11'''.":"-. '''' -7 4...arp -,t. YV. •• ''''',*'•;i' Rig,,,`It.,4,- ,'•,,i4Are,m, ';''''';•,,- ,•,,t.It: i eer,....'4.. ,044:,-4".4- . ,,,. -, ..T:41,4, -, :,61,p6I4.1,:--.0,lti Oar !t:.4e,t:,,Z.:'',,,,,,,; ,m TASA,1.,vh I..."-0.. 111.41,„,. '..P, l e''.Ai* V',;74 44;4,'3•4E^V.M.- 00. .4 """".'' ° %.'4'''''' t' V44t','4 ;• -..'0,,-,.1,0'e,,i7a Wok!.li ..,egH,.:.*'"..44.4'. ^ ,s.r" 4iliffine.'44424,110^".4'45.4511, „,.4,1, ,,, 1,2, ; .,,3-si„0-#6,1,1„ .4,, eir,„r& -404.4vgy „Z, ; -: 4..! .,.!,,i, ;- 0'ixi,Atin„,i.!„4:'7, 711.1,. .,11t,'W°1,4,t I Ati R. ' ' „ , ,,''i.'''0'''t - 11,4\44°t'4%;°44,„° "I:'''i't':;°'4;111,'' 't° ” r:-,—re :, '., - ., -;‘...".''' ' ,^k ' ''';.4rior,„ 4° ".44,,,goilt'44i, +":,- ,t441.44"1/441,444 1%.1.10., ....or ,.,40,A )040' .0. -,,- 4..,,,t1.7•44-:.„,"* ' tii,I.W.,.,,,:I,4,e. ''' Irir-•i ' • `91 '174 '•.',I. i -, 1 4-NAP,' 101.44.4A° 14(11* 1 ....w- ., ,t Af-i„-0,,,---c 6,.- ., r .,„ „ , or.,,,,,i,1,,,, 4,,,,f, ,,,,,,,.., 4, ,,,oi.,. ,4,..v..4 . silii,4c.0,..;, ..4.1 , .% ,-'.,,v4A0TAK ,„,„i'! 4' ,. i 4 1.; , ' ,„‘e, 10:46—104.°V.,/ -.,-.4,7.07 .4‘,4,-n, ' -k,*, °,.:4,1' -•AP , -k,i,011,ti •;,,,,t7,1,4•!•%-i , ,.1-1.0"•:,.,, . , S. 14 `P•14-:It:** r'`.••,''11:i. .',. '4 N. 74 16.4,k, 'Xs 4.;,irk,„';,',° 4,11.#7,`r*1...",,, ',„--,-"”,‘.„.......;, 1;j4,, fti.Nrtt•.. 011,1fs.4 i' ; ` 4.0,414V4:* ' .4.„i„*.,, :AA" '.1:1'' ' .' ,.'1 ' i,,,, ,,Aird4,,,,,,,,, 441 ' k4 i 1.14 .,,,,„tit,t, .„,.„„,,,,„,,,v,o,,sta ,,,„i ,0„, :,,) ..,.'„ ,. ...... ,,,,2,„ . . .44.41 .iiieromygt: '',1,r, , ” ' ,irverts yl l' 1 ° ,1,4tt- 0 ' i"•'11 ' 1 1 ti4 1/4 t -4i 4, • ",.:, *- •••:40., • ,%.,,, :„.• •,.,,,,v,,,-„,,,, :,•2-,,efi,,,,,_; ,,,, -.,,,-„,,,,,,,-, Al,1,„,.Iv,,...4,,,,,,,,,,044,,i, ,.. '°,1.•„, '41$ ,,••••.,4:,•-.7,: •'ft., I, 4,. 4.-P!.........4.41, ..,,m.„„_, - ,J,..i AIS ''.','‘. ".1"'"!' fiM, ' "' 'Z '''' , 0, „,..,f,,,,,,t., V.' °' °•peolw7::k- , *t..lgt.l..,„.114,41, „ "t. ,,,t,%el,14,-„ 41,,,e,v,,,...- ., .,••,,, 1 , ltir^i101 .4.41;:sNTV''40:'''''' ','4„Pl.,..,,,fift.t."i'it!'I:'',_,,::,.1'),w'., tk,":';'.„',41.,,,,,,,i,,,.,,;',"„*.',644'itl.fli li::),..1,.'4,:.44'.• it;T°r ...t,...4,.4.44. fickitv,,, . AILTAL'-'•1,. '„1‘``,.7^-,A*744,,,faitr)' ''''' "••,.' .t:1;44"4 •., - :. %. -, ,k,.• 16,01 , '..,IPA...4.1,„.,..„A 7 4' L'I. :- •;.....* . — - --* :_,,,k,.° '"-IL,..' "14. 44:0::'” i', ...- igk -,,J ,ii.A' ;,' ''' .1.17i''"'''''''''' ' ..A. .•A , AF.COM Technical Services,Inc. --COM low Bishop Street,Suite 1600 flonolul it,Hawal.4.1 96813 Ph.(808)521-5031 Project Reference: 60644974 ...........,.........,...________------..., Transportation Impact Assessment Report Hale Ola o Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Hilo, Hauvai`i November 2020 Prepared for: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation 100 Pauahi Street, Suite 204 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 (808) 987-6750 Prepared by: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 1001 Bishop Street, Suite 1600 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 (808) 521-5031 Project Reference: 60644974 L Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Table of Contents 1O INTRODUCTION 1 20 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 2.1 Site Description 2 2.2 Roadway Conditions 3 2.2.1 Roadway Desi dona 3 2.2.2 Intersection Conditions • 7 2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Conditions 9 2.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities 9 2.3.2 Bicycle Facilities 9 2.4 Public Transit Conditions 10 2.5 Transportation Conditions 11 2.5.1 Volume Data Collection and Adjustment 11 2.5.2 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes 13 2.5.3 Existing Intersection Operations 13 3.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS.. 15 3.1 Proposed Development 15 3.2 Future Roadway Conditions 15 3.2.1 Roadways 15 3.2.2 Intersections 15 3.3 Future Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Public Transit Conditions 15 3.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities 15 3.3.2 Bicycle Facilities 15 3.3.3 Public Transit 15 3.4 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Background Traffic 16 3.4.1 Ambient Traffic Growth 16 3.4.2 Future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center 17 3.5 Vehicular Trips Generated by Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development 19 3.6 Projected Year 2025 Traffic Volumes 2O 3.6.1 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Trip Distribution and Assinment 20 AECQM ! November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report • 3.6,2 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes �0 3 8 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Operations 23 4.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .. 24 4.1 Summary........ ....24 4.2 Evaluation of Traffic Signal Warrants at Kupuna Place 24 4.3 Recommendations 26 5.0 REFERENCES 27 List of Figures Figure 1 Project Site Location . 1 " Figure 2 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Conceptual Site Plan 2 Figure 3 Mohouli Street Looking Makai Toward Komohana Street . . 3 Figure 4 Mohouli Street Looking Mauka Toward Kukuau Street • 4 Figure 5 Komohana Street at Mohouli Street Looking North 5 Figure 6 Kukuau Street Approach to Mohouli Street Looking North 6 Figure 7 Kupuna Place 6 Figure 8 Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place Intersection 7 Figure 9 Mohouli Street/Komohana Street Intersection 8 Figure 10 Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street Intersection 9 Figure 11 Hele-On Bus Route for Intra-Hilo Kaumana Route 10 Figure 12 Adjusted Year 2020 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 12 Figure 13 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Volumes...18 Figure 14 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Generated • Traffic Volumes 21 Figure 15 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Volumes..., 22 Figure 16 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Mohouli/Kupuna Intersection25 Figure 17 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Mohouli/Kupuna Intersection 25 i 1 List of Tables Table 1 Adjusted Existing Weekday Peak Hour Intersection Operations 14 Table 2 Comparison of Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 16 Table 3 Projected Trip Generation by Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development 19 Table 4 Year 2020 and Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Operations Summary 23 AECOM November 2020 ' Trans Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residental Development • portation Impact AssessmentiReport • 1..0 INTROD CT1 N Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation is proposing to expand the existing Mohouli Senior Residences in Hilo, Hawaii. Hale Ola O Mohouli will add up to 90 affordable residential uses, The existing Mohouli Senior Residences has 184 residential units and at Adult Day Care Center. The proposed development site is located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Stree#. Figure 1 illustrates the project location. This transportation impact analysis report (TZAR) documents existing transportation conditions, projects future conditions in the vicinity of the proposed development with and without the proposed housing development and assesses the transportation impacts of the proposed action. It summarizes the transportation issues identified and proposes recommendations to address those issues. ,..„.e., 1 # k + e tT142 , , a f,yx1' z.s e ' t - .`4:30%.- a t -7,4 Q(g�oulaC9Onn8uflw1t5lis6idann y a} il *tit • , r ' „wt fitrcI � 1•`�' Ma_ _ v ' " eets rta � d1J „" 7, G . +w w" „ ;t4, $.4'', , 1 „e, t ,�2 ' `¢� irs ' k h Vi»."u p e ' B mii: w' � - • 1,0 n a, x M ax. _ _ _• A. is • .firn€�"yfi" ''.. ,,,,4-4J:4 roF �✓ i+ +„ 1, i Torld 41 t1141°AV,..1711‘t. �� : i, � "4 , ,I ,,..01 . ., .441,4; x �� f' • ,4 14P4p t , gyaru � ryI+ rP ` ' ,IY , ti Ci •% roe 1. ,- " ( .r / " S � g ,_ .. r" -7 I � w } bd 'id,4 ',,PV",''' ,, 3 4 t x'� ,, r - c a.:i : • nr.}e „ ''''',14-,g '`. wd A. 144ti; Et , I' ? ?1 ir l'i troi Ir ',1, a � * 'Xa "T Yt 1l1. , r "i..44'.54 , e .n.b { '1M• YE.. kd4 :9mtdr' X,.t. ' iiv,, . '11'' "i*a Figure 1 Project Site Location AEOOM 1 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report ' 2,0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2, 1 Site Description • The proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli affordable residential development will be on parcel TMK. (3) 2-4-001:168 located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. The currently vacant site is located between existing single-family residential development on Kukuau Street and the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center. Access to the site is proposed via a right-in/right-out driveway with direct access to Mohouli Street and via a driveway that would connect to existing Kupuna Place. Kupuna Place provides access to Mohouli Street for the existing Mohouli Senior Residences and will also provide access for the future County of Hawai'i Fire Department Dispatch Center. The Hale Ola 0 Mohouli driveway will connect to Kupuna Place via an • easement that crosses the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center site. A conceptual site plan is shown in Figure 2. \ '\ \ ,\ e { Future 7 w i ill ' :;�._u>„ coati-Wof Hawaii �r'l am i -,�''' Proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli ' ire Department Existing Mohouli Affordable Housing Expansion , tspa 'cyl Center Senior Residences 11 � i 1. fs.§ a ice'' _u. _ t- �E`'., Proposed"- • F . 12 'r . r t.'Right2fn/Rght-out -w JM','= ii ) -------7--r--- ] Lu Orivetivay- .. - x . ___ ' rStreet _ _ — .' _'----1 Figure 2 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Conceptual Site Plan AECOM 2 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2.2 Roadway Conditions Key roadways in this study are Mohouli Street. Komohana Street, Kukuau Street, and Kupuna Place. 22.I Roadway Descriptions Mohoulec,t. Mohouli Street provides mauka to makai access between Kaumana Drive and Kilauea Street. The older portion of the roadway, makai of Komohana Street, runs through a residential neighborhood and has a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour (mph). The roadway was extended mauka from Komohana Street to the Kaumana Drive/Ainako Avenue intersection in 2002. The newer section of roadway has wide paved shoulders that could be used to widen Mohouli Street to four lanes and has a posted speed limit of 45 mph. The lands adjoining this section of roadway are currently mostly vacant. The new section of roadway provides residents of Kaumana Drive and Ainako Avenue with an alternate access route to the south and west sections of Hilo. Figure 3 and Figure 4 illustrate the newer segment of Mohouli Street in the vicinity of the Kupuna Place access to the existing Mohouli Senior Residences. k p' ti '*"'"a :w. ! "�' :,' a �;"�:. •`'r. A ',fix ,*"". - 44:2 aid ' , "a+ w °". • Figure 3 Mohouli Street Looking Makai Toward Komohana Street AE OM 3 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report b"sc f 1k 4 S � )3 - � Lr� a T". a c , r "` r � # i P^. I x, d Ytj n r `°.'"".";"r"' .'ea^4t;i "4nty:wee�k�`A'� waaw. m F, ~, nb a 1w J. 7i ax as t �,x,,.x �f t -•9� dS Y A t � ��x h C�,"Y' .0'hp 6 9- �Tl 'F.M�:t 41,44,• • t:Zehi7i0 4 Ire %w '� too •a" , ar, Figure 4 Mohouli Street Looking Mauka Toward Kukuau Street Komohana Street Komohana Street runs in a general north to south direction between Waianuenue Avenue and Ainaola Drive. The portion of roadway south of Puainako Street generally passes through residential areas while the northern section adjoins vacant lands, The posted speed limit is 45 mph. Komohana Street serves as a commuter route for residents in the south and west sections of Hilo to reach downtown Hilo, Hilo Hospital. and Hilo High School. Figure 5 illustrates Komohana Street at Mohouli Street looking north. • AECOM 4 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report wiro- J ., �, rJ'y ♦9 fa n k 6w 'S {f`,: fff tir7. y.,...e.,4`y".F, M,x'r `.yY y�y w _ .• ✓ ' '.A •r 111:04,11,%V.,We IN 't 7..1 .... Figure 5 Komohana Street at Mohouli Street Looking North Kukuau Street Kukuau Street is a two-lane County minor collector road. The older roadway section, makai of Komohana Street, runs through a residential neighborhood and intersects with Kapi'olani Street. The newer roadway, mauka of Komohana Street, provides access to a mauka residential subdivision. The extension of Mohouli Street created a new intersection on this roadway. The posted speed limit on Kukuau Street is 35 mph in the vicinity of Mohouli Street. Figure 6 shows Kukuau Street at Mohouli Street looking north. .ICOM 5 November 2020 • Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report e r f YY f _ M. y 'I R M `, s r . —1 ,w.. ,y - i -4'1:-47*-_ ."--`-'-.—_ .._ a`. tea..-. �,. ►�c�..'a.__-ter: __ _ —�C`— ._ -�-- - � ",-- ' — Figure 6 Kukuau Street Approach to Mohouli Street Looking North Kupuna Place Kupuna Place provides access to Mohouli Street for the existing Mohouli Senior 1 Residences Figure 7 shows Kupuna Place at its intersection with Mohouli Street. \ ., . ' \ . t . 2 "•-c. e. ,,,,,,,,-,;,?/,--„,'1;- 40 4 E ...' .. .: ..t_ '' '.g+ - -' • w f t _..•....n..+........++,.+moi' Figure 7 Kupuna Place AECOM 6 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2.2.2 Intersection Conditions Traffic data was collected at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection and updated at the Mohouli StreetlKomohana Street and Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersections Kupuna Place intersects Mohouli Street at an unsignalized "T'-intersection with STOP- sign control on the Kupuna Place leg of the intersection. The Kupuna Place approach is configured with a single lane, although there is sufficient width so that right-turning and left-turning vehicles can move concurrently. There is a refuge in the painted Mohouli Street median for vehicles turning left out of Kupuna Place onto Mohouli Street. The eastbound Mohouli Street approach is a single-lane approach with a median left- turn lane for traffic turning int Kupuna Place. The westbound Mohouli Street approach is configured with a through lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. There are no crosswalks across the approaches to this intersection. Figure 8 is a photograph of the Kupuna Place approach to the intersection. jl7�s .w •+ Win. , ,1. 1..;. • �.. ;qtr —� ,• , . '^u3Yatlya V 'f F k°J, °s tl5 :-,114t15`.1/441',411779P,11;, s , r 1i}, t+, ,sof? jtl ,d i. uta1"1W4:"4, z _yq . s ,*,°�.'" "Q e4 q� Mpg1r'Y'` : � ., Figure 8 f�1ohoull Street/Kupuna Place Intersection Mohouli Street/Kornohana Street The Mohouli StreetlKomohana Street intersection is a four-legged, signalized intersection located east of the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection. Figure 9 shows the intersection configuration.. A COM 7 November 2020 • Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development • Transportation Impact Assessment Report xtIflllUllllll - ,. *!1 11171 ,r ,: t Figure 9 Mohouli Street/Komohana Street Intersection All intersection approaches are configured with a single through lane and exclusive left- turn lanes. The eastbound Mohouli Street and northbound Komohana Street approaches also have exclusive right-turn lanes. The westbound Mohouli Street and southbound Komohana Street approaches have shared through/right-turn lanes. The westbound, southbound, and northbound approaches have protected/permissive left-turn turn signal phasing, while the eastbound approach has protected left-turn signal phasing. There are crosswalks and pedestrian signals on all intersection approaches. Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street The Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersection is a four-legged, unsignalized intersection with a STOP-sign control on the Kukuau Street intersection approaches. Figure 10 shows the intersection configuration. Both Mohouli Street approaches are configured with exclusive left-turn lanes and shared through/right-turn lanes. The Kukuau Street approaches are configured a shared left- through-right lanes, although there are wide, paved shoulders that would allow right- turning vehicles to bypass vehicles waiting to turn left or proceed straight through the intersection. There are crosswalks across all approaches of the intersection. aelECOM 8 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report _ .c7? "1— 0174.:... .,i, ra tea: (d�F7t �ar ". e n. 't1^ x ^P'pr„�r ; .i' *,,,,,vi As!�@ftlfifflt11 +� ,k' '.- s: ., 1 i i 4 M_ .V :', r # ilUt . 4,1,,,,,,,--57,-.10.4?,,,IAll.'4f.,74, , li. L '1111,N.-,- 7,-,S,,,.,„ ..-- • .,i.*-1°..4. t.,`:,„/:- r%i' MaTiau1 fieet Illlll(1111:11111 . yam ,s�y..^gp"my;.. ice koho11i1,:pt—c, ._ — Pim t--• li�i3� ,.«�-"� ea .: �,,1� •� 4"'� , fw ks , t ra eiw , .a TT'....f 4 '. - ' "..,'^, - rkt+"�ey110 • � .•. I•. ,Aw4 ,''awxr 1 wi ` f r + w s e NIrk . , . � > *"ta j - u- K _-..it4,t•^:o-.,.4 .,+,'.. .-'1., . .. ..,., ,- -. _. ._ - _•. -r w^.. • .+�•5°'.P.14.; Figure 10 Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street Intersection 2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Conditions 2.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities The intersections on Mohouli Street at Komohana Street and Kukuau Street have 1 crosswalks across all approaches. The Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection does not have crosswalks. There are no sidewalks along Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. There are wide, paved shoulders and it was observed that they are used by pedestrians as sidewalks. There are sidewalks alongthe internal roadways within the Mohouli Senior Residences, Y including on Kupuna Place. 2.3.2 Bicycle Facilities There are no designated bicycle facilities along Mohouli Street, Komohana Street, or Kukuau Street in the vicinity of the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli site. However, as noted previously, the roadways in the area have wide, paved shoulders that are utilized by bicyclists as well as pedestrians. AE OM 9 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report • 2.4 Public Transit Conditions The public transit service on the island of Hawaii is provided by the County's Hele-On Bus system. Figure it illustrates the closest existing transit service routes in the vicinity of the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli site. At this time. the site is not served by fixed transit routes. It was observed that the senior daycare located within the existing Mohouli Senior Residences provides shuttle bus service to some of its participants. s :- INT to-k111 2 KAi. 11ANA Cc:^ix,:,zt ilily ditty "7'1\1 '' 7 (71 yr 4i Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Site • - „„„ Figure 11 Hele-On Bus Route for intra-Hilo Kaumana Route ICOM 10 _ November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2.5Transportation Conditions . 2.5.1 Volume Data Collection and Adjustment Due potentially atypical conditions due to COVID-19 related restrictions, alternative methods for establishing base condition traffic volumes were used. Base traffic turning movement volumes at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street and the Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersections were obtained from the Traffic Impact Analysis Report for Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood Project, September 2011. Vehicular turning movement, bicycle, and pedestrian counts were conducted at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection, These counts were conducted for the AM arid PM peak periods on Tuesday, October 20, 2.020 and Wednesday, October 21, 2020 from 6:00 AM to 8:30 AM for the AM peak period and 3:15 PM to 5:30 PM for the PM peak period. State of Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) link traffic volumes on Mohouli Street and on Komohana Street for years 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 were obtained and used to adjust the traffic turning movement counts to an estimate of what the base traffic volumes would be without the effects of COV1D-19. These HOOT counts were also used to help estimate future ambient traffic growth rates. Figure 12 summarizes the adjusted Year 2020 peak hour traffic turning movement - volumes at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street, the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place, and the Mohouli StreetlKukuau Street intersections. The weekday AM peak hour was estimated to occur from 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM and the PM peak hour was determined to occur from 3:15 PM to 4:15 PM. The traffic count summary sheets from the 2011 study,the recently counted Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection, and the HDOT counts are included in Appendix A. • ICOM 11 November2020 • Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report yam. • c oa U e Y r9r 1p�`7\ .. '.O 4_0I'D'- , °yo *00• cmc G am• ��. py v �tnc iv.� . ,..,§ g°a uP°na p, • K � '�s iay a ka81 1,.../k .-31 a c Al ion' a 1 j Cc, a w U-Uii s o B a 0 >.s i- m 7� 4 1 0. O zr( a , o a. af2j Ni- Q4,( i 0 re vl` ; d .. .o SSA ci '1- a r ery.'n, <S o Ili a a q a 9 �n 0 z o o w O W ac O O Q Z Figure 12 Adjusted Year 2020 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volunies . 444.C.COM 12 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report _Y 2.5.2 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes Low pedestrian and bicycle volumes were observed. Both the pedestrian and bicyclists were observed using the paved shoulders on Mohouli Street. During the AM peak hour 1 bicycle and 7 pedestrians were observed. Most of the pedestrians observed appeared to be walking for exercise or were walking a pet. • During the PM peak hour 1 bicycle and 0 pedestrians were observed. A greater number of pedestrians were observed later with the largest number, 13, occurring from 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM. As in the AM peak hour, most of the pedestrians observed appeared to be walking for exercise or were walking a pet. The pedestrian and bicycle counts are included in Appendix A with the traffic count summary sheets. There are separate worksheets for the pedestrian and bicycle counts. 2.5.3 Existing Intersection Operations- The three intersections were analyzed using the adjusted Year 2020 peak hour turning movement volumes and existing intersection configurations. Table 1 summarizes the calculated intersection delay and level of service (LOS)for the weekday AM and PM commuter peak hour time periods. The intersections were analyzed using the unsignalized intersection capacity methods described in the Highway Capacity Manual, Sixth Edition (HCM) through the Synchro/SimTraffic software. The Synchro analysis worksheets are included in Appendix B. As shown in Table 1,the key turning movements at each intersection operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS)for peak hour conditions. The left-turn movement from Kupuna Place to eastbound Mohouli Street reflects analyses conducted assuming a vehicle having to execute the turn in one maneuver. As noted previously, there is a median left-turn refuge area that allows vehicles to complete the left-turn maneuver in a two-step process, making the left-turn movement much easier.Assuming that vehicles must complete the left-turn in one maneuver results in a conservatively high delay. LOS for unsignalized intersections is a qualitative index based on a quantitative ,performance measure such as intersection delay to express the relative level of traffic operations. Definitions of LOS are included in Appendix C. : O13 Novernber.2D20 _- '- — Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordab'e Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Table 1 Adjusted Ex:si.ng%Nee�Uyy PeaxHmr(otOmar;8nnCIperaiiOris AM Peak HourPM Pee' intersection/Movement Delay LOS Delay LOS m000vmuoxvav ED Mohouli LT 7 9 * __ WB Mohouli LI us A 8.0 A NB Kukusu Combined / ao* C 14.8 � SB Kukuau Combined 12.3 {| B 15.3 c xv Mommm�� ' } P [ \ 11 sewoomucr ' ry A | 8I / A aexu,unacr 18.1 c /8.7 c SB Kupuna RT 9.8 A B mvxomxKvmvhava 33.6 C 36.6 D Moles: Delay is seconds/vehicle Analyses performed using 1 and summarized consistent with HCM,6th Edition,parameters AECOM 14 November 2020 ---- -- f ' Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development •, • Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS 3.1 Proposed Development The proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development proposes up to 90 affordable residential units on parcel TMK (3) 2-4-001:168 located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street aiid Kukuau Street. A conceptual site plan is shown in Figure 2 of this report. Access to the site is proposed via a right-in/right-out driveway with direct access to Mohouli Street and via a driveway that would connect to existing Kupuna Place. Kupuna Place provides access to Mohouli Street for the existing Mohouli Senior Residences and will also provide access for the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center. The Hale Ola 0 Mohouli driveway will connect to Kupuna Place via an easement that crosses the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center site. Assumed project time frame is five years in the future. 3.2 Future Roadway Conditions 3.2.1 Roadways No changes to Mohouli Street, Komohana Street, Kupuna Place, or Kukuau Street are anticipated within the time frame of this study. Mohouli Street, in the vicinity of the proposed project, has wide paved shoulders that would enable widening in the future if justified by background traffic growth. 3.2,2 Intersections No changes to the existing intersections of Mohouli Street/Komohana Street, Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place, or Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street are anticipated within the time frame of this st . 3;3 Future udyPedestrian, Bicycle, and Public Transit Conditions 3.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities No changes to the existing pedestrian facilities at the locations evaluated in this.study are assumed. 3.3.2 Bicycle Facilities As noted previously, bicyclists traveling along Mohouli Street either share the road with vehicular traffic or use the wide paved shoulders. No changes are assumed for within the time 'frame of this study. 3.3.3 Public Transit Hele-On bus routes documented in the existing conditions section of this report are assumed to remain the same within the time frame of this evaluation. AOM 1 5 November 2020 • - • Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.4 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Background Traffic Background traffic refers to traffic unrelated to the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli affordable housing development. Background traffic was projected for Year 2025 conditions based on an assumed five-year time frame for the proposed development. There are two maincomponents to a the background traffic volumes: • growth in traffic on Mohouli Street, Komohana Street, and Kukuau Street: • traffic generated by the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center. 3.4.1 Ambient Traffic Growth Table 2 compares peak hour traffic volumes counted from 2007 to 2020 at the • intersections evaluated in this study. As shown, traffic volumes have remained relatively consistent over the past 10 plus years on Mohouli Street and Komohana Street. With the exception of the 2020 counts, the traffic volume data are pre-COVID-19. Table 2 Comparison of Peak Hour Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Roadway Segment Eastbound Westbound_ Total Eastbound Westbound Total Mohouli.Kukuau-Kupuna 498 290 788 272 545 817 (2007 count) Mohouli:Kukuau-Kupuna 558 325 893 322 485 807 (2009 count) Mohouli:Kukuau-Kupuna 495 242 737 315 457 772 (2020 count) Mohouli:Kupuna- Komohana 470 245 715 290 527 817 (2007 count) Mohouli:Kupuna- Komohana 535 255 790 300 485 7B5 (2009 count) Mohoutt:Kupuna- • Kornohana 516 261 777 345 482 ` 827 (2020 count) Northbound Southbound Total Northbound Southbound Total Kornohana:South of Mohouli 1,215 430 1,645 605 890 1.495 (2007 count) Komohana:South of Mohouli 1,135 455 1.590 615 930 1,545 (2009 count) Kornohana:South of Mohouli 1.102 435 1,537 618 867 1,485 (2019 HOOT) Note:AM Peak Hour:7:00 AM-8.00 AM.PM Peak Hour:4:00-5:00 PM(varies slightly) Counts 2007,2009,and 2019 are prior to COVID-19 conditions • Based on the historic traffic data, it is judged that current background traffic growth will be based on new projects occurring in the vicinity of the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli COM 16 November-2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report affordable residential project. Many large projects were previously expected to occur by 2020 but have not. If they do proceed, an update of their entitlements will likely be needed. Therefore, growth in the year 2025 peak hour forecast of traffic at the intersections evaluated in this study is based on likely projects that will occur in the immediate vicinity of the Hale Ola O Mohouli project. A project that meets that criterion is the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center located on the parcel adjacent to the Hale Ota 0 Mohouli project. Traffic from the Fire Dispatch project will be added to the adjusted existing year 2020 traffic to • forecast theear 2025 background traffic. Y g 3.4.2 Future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center Forecast of traffic generated by the County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center was obtained from a previous study entitled Traffic Impact Analysis Report, County of Hawaii Fire Administration Support Complex, February 2008. This is considered a conservatively high estimate of traffic generated as the land use assumed in the report contained more than just a dispatch center. Figure 13 illustrates the projected Year 2025 peak hour turning movement volumes for the background traffic. AECOM - 17 November.2020 .... . , • Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report • ,-;z• 2 .... .. . z. 0 i 0 a • , , 5,cP‘e ., • ,o,'(4 .." . he- ,..0.,‘ - .-,.. =---,- -, - ,.., 4. f 4\%266s, , .0, • .,,,,- ,-..„-t. ,- c•:,,,z1.„ •...i, , Sk• • ei2- ,0"' .„.-)0 -1 i' 0 -•A.401 0 *P • I ' . .6s l'il. • %'. i % • \ . _ ...00/".\ , • 1 / •:- li. ' V) ea, LIJ --,V, fee' ,,SN- - eS•• c•Y ...e.cn c i,c1 = Ow 0 71 1/1 0 ..k• ' , . •0•. . , AI"- 1-5, LI 1 e 4)-4 E. .. - u.. % . 0 I ....., . . . . x is B• . cc 1--- U-() — 0 . , E 0 a 2 , • < i 0 . 1.9 2,5,'• 1--g. tio . iet, • 2-. 0 2 32 , la'cj 1.6 0 4 m ct-o n ) 0 ts ' 0, x 4 tu z< . • A j`P ,?- * a. ... _ >14 f •'••1 •4-4 z ‘ v <c:1 < .72 • ,.? ... iv CD M Z ' - '. 4-- ' 3, ...s = .. .,'* < = 2:. c_ .0 •-,)- m •;:, UJ , 2 0 i•-• 0 wo v : S --)Lii —0„.,,, I c.• s')‘ -..•.. 0 a) LI k) . re 73 a i ' Figure 13 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Volumes ICOM 18 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable R ` nhalDevelopment Transportation }mpa(tAs�emsn�entRepo� ---- ------' 3.5 Vehicular Trips G.u«neratted by Halo Ola 0 Moli0u!i Affordable Residential Development Table 3 summarizes the land use and estimated vehicular volumes that would be generated by the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development. The vehicular volume is based on the trip generation rates documented in the Institute of Transportation (ITE) pLlbhcation, Trip Generation, 10''' Edition. Equations for AM and PM peak hours of adjacent street traffic was used in this calculation. The trip generation eqfor Category 210 (Apartment) was used to estimate the vehicular traffic generated by the site. The index used as a predictor was the maximum number of dwelling units proposed. Table 3 Projected Trip Generation by Hale Ola Mohouii Afforclabie Residentiai Development � yTE AM Peak Hour / PM Peak Hour Land Use Intensity Category | In Out In Out ° Multi-family 90D�U� 210 10 38 44 24 Residential} / -- Notes:AMand PMpeak hour traffic volumes are invehicles per hour.Trip Generation b the.estimation ofvehicu)nrtrafGcbasedoneqvadonsdooumentedintheInsdtotenf Transportation Engineers publication,Trip Generation, 10th Edition, For Category 2Z0-Apartment,the t�pgenemhonequahonSae: AM:T=B.4B(X)+373 (20%EnteExiting) PM: T ~ =0.55 ` .V0+ 17.65 .<65�Ente�n�/35��[xi Exiting) where Ttraffic volumes (vehicles per hour).X=dwelling units D.U.-dweUingunds ASC» mo 1A ,N . | -__ / Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.6 ProjectedYear 2025 Traffic Volumes 1.6.1 Hide Okt 0 jMuhouli 'Frit) Distribution ;.u1(1 Assignment The projected Year 2025 vehicular volumes generated by the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli project summarized in Table 3 were directionally distributed and assigned to the roadway network. The directional distribution of turns onto and from Mohouli Street was based on the traffic turning movement conducted October 20-21, 2020. Turning movements at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street and Mohouli StreeUKukuau Street intersections utilized the turning movement patterns in the adjusted existing turning movements. The resulting projected Year 2025 traffic volumes generated by the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development are summarized in Figure 14. 3.6.2 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The projected traffic volumes generated by the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development summarized in figure x were combined with the projected Year 2025 background traffic summarized in Figure y to obtain the total Year 2025 peak hour traffic volumes. The total projected Year 2025 peak hour traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 15. • AOM 20 November 2020 . . ..... , .. .. .... ....._,.. ,, .. . , . Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report .• • 6.- — • (t- 110 I;L: d 7 .4N.,,cso.,...:,,:.,,,,,.., %-- ..„,,, I cn _ , . . . i g.a` E. tx.a o A a ,.. tc c cz.:- -.-• ... ui 2 OX") w2 t III Ce- i rill-,,•e-Ji le :I o I X . • r 'a:.- E I 2 11.! °' •F• 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 T$ 005 .6. ''1-' ' I 0.0 CZ .1) 0 I 1 * -i,- . •-‘, a.< , „ 2 a. z , . .4 •• iC".• 0 '4 1 X 13. 4' s? cst 0 X 0 o ,, --1- . •••••Z. IIS•,;),,,I m o t11 , 1 )- z . cl 0 s' S4 a. • , ).-- 0 Z cc e• o 0 .0 Lu — z E 4 • ...-. ... . , Figure 14 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Generated Traffic Volumes AECOM 21 November 2020 • . ,,,,,..,,....,.„.„,..._... \,.. Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report _......_ .. i e , o . ,..., "(..,. ,..• 6, ..:, .4" , ' 'V ‘\+ • ' it 1 1,,,f, ,• • -12 4. • #4yil •,'", - ..\' , 5 ".g 1.Z4-4 oo... „,.. o5s*- -,•,', . C-`.1-I 5'.' Ce e' 4` U•I 2 t (/) i...- g 0 •10.-^A , ',':;-„, = 4 0 111 Cf.,' 0 4 x (4- ,93"02,51 > P. 5 !,...''. c",-. • 0 U. u-LI' 'a Q 1 U. 4 < < 1 CC 4,5 2 cii-Fs -3 *4 a= 4.0 2.0 2Y, .-7^ZF 0 2 ea ce ..z.-r--', ' 1- 04toli 0 ii tb, 7 4.• 2 4 0 z.< _ 4't jes1.4 1 ..c 4' c0 tx .o4 < '• . .. Qf .9 ,a -.'.".• -S'rip4 > .„c 0 ,,e , -4-''' ••-•4 0 LUZ '*°.' i t. •,,S 0 C 1.. •V IX 75 Figure 15 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Volumes AECOM, 22 - November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Rert 3.8 Projected Year 202 5 Peak HVUi' |oLcr3eCtiou0ye/-abOm3 The projected Year 2025 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes with and without the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development were used to evaluate future intersection operations. The signalized and unsignalized HOM 6h Edition methods as implemented by the Synchro analysis software was used. Table 4 summarizes the results of the existing 2O2O. year 2O25without project, andyear2026u/hhpu4eotintarseohon analyses for AM and PM peak hour conditions, Table 4 Year 2020 and Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Operations Summary AM Peak Hour ' 2025 wm 2025 2025 wio memacm��|cve*len ' pml_e,c1 Existing Project , Delay1 LOS I oelaL LOS , Dela, I LOS . Delay | Lou oal,L LOS | nusw LOS mnxomvxvxuav � EBmoxmulicr -- | oa A 7.9 A 7.9 A 8,3 . A A 8.3 A %NBwuhouli LT ' o.o A 8.5 A 8,5 _ A 80 £�_ 81 A 8.1 A NB Kkuau Combined 20.4 C 20,6 C 20,9 C /^ua mo B 15o C oammvavcnmwcmu 12.312,4 B o 12.5 B 15,3 C 15.4 c | /o,o c Hale Ola oMvnouxni/eo ooRxnonT ^a n^ nn na es A ,ta na ( na na moxov/xxo2�a �ewvxnv}i T � 7.9 A 8.1 A 8.1 A 8.7 8.Z_ A naxupunaLr 18.1 C 18.7 C 2/,1 C 18,7 C 22.1C 26.6_ o SB Kupuria RT 9.8 A 9.8 A 9.9 A 110 8 11.7 B 1z1 B muxouxmomouanaL �' 33.6 C 33.7 ' C 38.6 o 36.6 D 36.8 D 38.6 o Notes: Delay is in secnumvnmu^ Analyses performed using Synchro Version 11 and summarized consistent with HCM 6Ih Edition parameters na=not applicable ---- __- --___-- Asshnwn' UheHa!eOlaC} Mohou|iaffupdah|enasidentiddevelopmEmtha3re|ahvay small traffic impacts at the intersections evaluated. The added traffic does contribute to a slight increase in overall intersection delay at the Mohouli Street/Kornohana Street intersection, and because the overall intersection delay due to current and projected background traffic volumes at this intersection are near the threshold for LOS C, the slight increase in delay moves this intersection to LOS D, usually considered acceptable to Lirban peak hour conditions. AEm.Onvx 23 November 2020 • Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 4.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Summary The proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development is a proposed affordable residential development that expands the existing Mohouli Senior Residences in Hilo It will contain - up to 90 multi-family residential units and is located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. The proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development is projected to generate 48 vehicles per hour(vph) during the AM peak hour with 10 vph inbound and 38 vph outbound. In the PM peak hour, it is expected to generate 68.vph with 44 vph.inbound and 24 vph outbound. The additional traffic generated by the proposed Hale Ole .0 Mohouli development is forecasted to have minor impacts on intersection operations at the intersections in the vicinity of the proposed development. A proposed driveway with traffic movements restricted to right-in/right-out movements will be effective in reducing traffic activity on_ Kupuna Place. The existing roadway infrastructure would be able to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development. 4.2 Evaluation of Traffic Signal Warrants at Kupuna Place The projected Year 2025 peak hour turning movements were used to evaluate the need for a traffic signal at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection. Currently, this intersection operates as a two-way STOP-sign controlled intersection with the STOP- . • sign on the Kupuna Place approach. Figure 16 and Figure 17 show graphic evaluations of the peak hour traffic signal warrant as documented in the Manual on Uniform Control Devices (MUTCD), 2009 as revised, for the projected year 2025 AM peak hour and the 2025 PM peak hour time periods.. As shown, in Figure 17, the projected year 2025 PM peak hour volumes are closer to warranting a traffic signal at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection than the projected year 2025 AM peak hour volume. Even for the projected year 2025 PM peak hour, the peak hour traffic signal warrant in not satisfied. The projected year 2025 PM peak hour traffic on.Mohouli Street is 910 vehicles per hour. To satisfy the peak hour traffic warrant,this volume would need to increase to approximately 1,000 vehicles per hour, a 10 percent increase. Given the fairly stable. • traffic volume level on Mohouli Street between year 2007 and year 2020, it is anticipated that this 10 percent increase would require growth over,-a substantial number of years or would be caused by a dramatic increase in development in the vicinity of the intersection. AEcOM 24 November 2020 . . Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Year 2025 AM Peak Hour Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3,Peak Hour(70%Factor) COMMUNITY LESS THAN i000 POPULATION OP ABOVE•10 MN Cri MAJOR STNE E T1 ! • , IX, - . . ".'',Oil Mont ,..,l.:51,?. .. : 2 Lq,,kIDFI Z ,.. t.MJCP-1 i 1 oia morai,EAr4Ez;, 1 L..Ni-- ' ' STREE t -„,...0 - -- .4 ..,2— • 4 I f : HIGHER- I ' "" , 1 ,..1 LANE A LANE VOLUME . . APPROA'CI-1- I 20 --- ----- - - - -- - - -- ' i VPH . I 4/110 1 i i I \ i 1 I 1 1 I ,1.-0 400 SIX) 000 709 mo 900 i0cx) 1109 120 1,191) MAJOR STREET--TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-- VEHCLES PER/-1Cliiri Vs'111-q '1401e;109 vpis app/tee as Me cower threahold vcarena kr a minchsvaat approach with Wag!moo lane;am 75 y0.1611,0 ai;ha low.;( rterasrmla volume or a mirJar-slroet;approach WElt one lane. Figure 16 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-MohouliiKupuna Intersection Year 2025 PM Peak Hour Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3,Peak Hour(70%Factor) . . (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) I 1 1 FT- 400 2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES---L--__I --- I I I 1 1 I MINOR 2 OR MORE LANES Z. 1 LANE STREET 2,00 — — HIGHER- .11111111 •1 LANE&1 LANE VOLUME APPROACH- 200 — ! VPH --"lilli"Illf 111111111ftimilaw.... I 1 J 100. 100 1 1 300 400 500 600 7010 600 900 1000 1 CO 1200 1300 • MAJOR STREET—TOTAL CF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR(VPH) 'Note:100 vph applies as the lower throshoW volume or a minor-streel approach with two or mare lanes and 75,rph applies as trre lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach Willi one lane. , Figure 17 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Mohouli/Kupuna Intersection . . AECOM 25 Nbvember 2020 , . — Hale Ola 0 Mohouh Affordable Residential Development • Transportation Imct Assessment Rert 4.3 Recommendations The following improvements are recommended for the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development: ° Implement the proposed right-tn/right-out driveway on Mohouli Street. As part of the implementation, restripe part of the wide paved shoulder on westbound Mohouli Street as a right-turn only lane into the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development: ° Assure that future mjor development occui in the area with traffic imto the segment of Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street provide an evaluation of traffic signal warrant for the MohOuli Street/Kupunauna Place.intersection. ` • MOOM 26 November 2620 . . Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report SM REFERENCES Hawaii Island Hele-On Bus - Hele-On - A Service of the County of Hawaii Mass Transit Agency. (2020). Retrieved from http:llwww.heleonbus.org/ Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2012. `210 Single Family Detached Housing." In Trip Generation Manual 10'h Edition, Volume 2: Data 297-298. Washington DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers. Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2012. "230 Residential Condominium/Townhouse." In Trip Generation Manual 9 ' Edition, Volume 2: Data 395-396. Washington DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers. Transportation Research Board of the National Academics. 2010. "Urban Street Facilities." In Highway Capacity Manual 2010, 3:16-1-16-47. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. 2009. "4C. Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies." In Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 4C.03 439-441. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration. AEEEOM 27 November 2020 Appendix A Traffic Count Data Raw Vehicle Turning Movement Traffic Count Worksheets ' / ' , 1 ' { j, File Name: C:\Users\jeffersomyoung1Documents\Kupuna_MohoulAkupuna_Mohouli Start Date: 1021/2020 , Start Time6:00:00 AM Site Code00000000 Comment 1: Default Comments , Comment 2: Change These in The Preferences Window Comment 3: Select File/Preference in the Main Scree . Comment 4: Then Click the Comments Tab ., - + ' , �� ?� ^`� � if,„'-",,,-,--","?— ��000u'; �'z�xr.��-^L*n��, ewus'_ � 06:00 XVI 0 0 0 0 , 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 ` 06:15 AM, 2 0 3 0 3 21 0 0 u o u 0 0 59 1 0 ( 06:30 AM 1 0 3 o 3 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 / 0 06:45 Am 0 0 2 0 6 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 o o 07:00 AM o 0 6 0 3 49 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 1 0 o715 AIVI' 1 0 9 0 10 uo 0 u o o 0 0 0 133 n n m7:30 uM 2 0 5 0 3 70 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 124 2 0 ' 07:45 AM x 0 7 0 9 78 b o 0 0 0 0 0 113n 0 ! 06:00 AM 1 0 5 0 9 52 0 0 n a a a a 94 2 o / 08:15 XVI 1 0 s 0 6 53 0 o 0 o o 0 0 83 1 0 AM Peek Hour 8 0 27 0 25 236 n o 0 a 0 0 0 489 a 0 7:00-8:00 AM ' ^ Vehicle Coun . ' ' | . ' • , . • . ) ' . - . . File Name; C:\Users\jeffersonpun AM Peak.ppd Start Date: 10/21/2020 Start Time: 6:00:00 AM Site Code: 00000000 _ Comment 1: Default Comments Comment 2: Change These in The Preferences Window `� Comment 3: Select File/Preference in the Main Scree Comment 4: ThClick thComments Tab ' .� �� - ,. : -, , : Trull | ' Left�.,I -Peds - I 06:00 MI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 AM 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 uu:aawm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 o _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 — 0 0 0 0 'o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:80-Am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 07:45 AM 0 0 V 0 i0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 ^o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 u 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ;. AIVI peak Flour o ' 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 i7:90:4:00 "= Bicycle Count , . ' . . . i 1 re . . — ` File Name: CUAMPeak4pd Start 1Date: 10/21/2020 Start Time: 6:00:00 AM , Site Code00000000 Comment 1: Default Comments Comment 2: Change These in The Preferences Window Comment 3: Select File/Preference in the Main Scree Comment 4: Then Click the Comments V . " ` ^ ' From '; � . r ��,,:geds I-,,'c^Righe1: Thor`1 Left _,I ,.Peds i 06:00 AM u o 0 0 o u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 06:15 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 06:30 AM o 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z o n 06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 3 1 0 07:00AM 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 ' .07:35 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30mw ' I 0 0 0 0 -u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 n 07:45 AM n o 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 o 08:00 Aryl .0 e 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n o 08:15 AM 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 *MPeak Flour 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 3 n 7:00-8:00 Am ' ` Pedestrian Count . ' | . . , ' , i ' 1 , . ' ' File Name: C:\Uoomtjoffersoo,youogU]onumenbU<upuno_tvlohuuDU<upuno_MnhuuUPMPouk„ppd Start Date: {0202O2O Start Time3:16:00 PM Site Code00000000 Comment 1: Default.Comments Comment 2: Change These in The Preferences Window COmment 3: Select File/Preference in the Main Scre Comment Then Click the Comments Tab , � � �� ~ ` ' .� �'� . "Pgdg,f . 'Rinmt-[ Thru 'I Left ',":1-Pods; ':1 03:15•pm 3 0 4 0 9 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 0 u 03:30 PM 3 0 6 0 4 112 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 75 3 0 03:45 PM 3 0 8 0 9 100 0 0 0 0 oo o 88 1 o 94:09 PM 1 0 12 0 7 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 3 o 0 0 5 0 n 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 n 04:30Pa 1 0 9 0 11 120 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 69 0 0 o*�npm \ 0 67 0 0 0 7 0 2 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 � uxo .upm 1 0 6 o 6 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 0 0 ' 05:15 PM 1 0 3 u 3 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 72 u 0 � 3 0 33 0 28 454 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 312 3 0 1 • Vehicle Coun ' / . . , } ' — ' — File Name: PM Peak.ppd Start Date: 1O/2O/202O Stan Time3:15:00 PM SiteCode: ODO0OQoU ' Comment 1: Default Comments Comment 2: Change These in The Preferences Window Comment 3: Selct File/Preference in the Main Scree , Comment 4: Then Click the Comments Tab � ~ � ` �``� / �� ' �� — : '/ From Nem ,� .�,��, "�p��p��*]rmLeft `�T� � � ' /- Pxmx / 03;15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n nnwnpM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 Pm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u u o 0 Pw' 0 0 o 0 0 2- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:,45•Pw. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 05:00 PM o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u n 05:/5pm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 o 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o aicymoount | ; ` • _ | � . ' ' � ! . ^ , i • . / | ` - ' . . File Name: |}PMPeak.ppd Start Date; 10/20/2020 Start Time: 3:15:00 PM Site Code: 00000000 I Comment 1: Default Comments Comment 2: Change These in The Preferences Window Comment 3: Select File/Preference in the Main Scree Comment 4: Then Click the Comments Tab -MOHOUL I ST- �� ° ~ � `` � � West� .`` -0��~` TBd4[l~Txm' L Left .0|`-Pads' ] 03:15Pm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:45 PM 0� 0 o 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 -04:15p m' �: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z 0 0 nwuoPM o- 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 04;45 PM 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:0opm0 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 � 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 Pedestrian Coun . . ' ' ' ` � , ~^` — .`-- Traffic Count Data from TIAR for Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood Project - September 2011 • . , • , KUKUAU ST KUKUAU ST to rn au ka to niduka to CD c, L 5 L 5 , tr., c ,.. 5.0 c-,) c-a — 500 c‘i — - ,— 295 MOHOULI ST —1 •1 1-, r 45 MOHOULI ST --1 4 L-- I- 20 . .._ 10 j -2 t i--• MOHOULI ST 50 T —, I r. • 230 - c to Kau mana 435 - CD LC) N LC) 85 1 0 -1 CD in L 5 L 20 Co in t 5 T._ 60 rr) c2, ED (D 0 0 Ct Lr) LC) Er) Er) N 01 C.1 •,— .-- 170 — 310 ''' '-' ,-- 490 - 580 . ..-1 1 . L-• .1- 145 -1 1 1- 1- 25 -1 1 1- i 130 -I 1 L.-- f 20 120 J -2 I r-- 10 J -2 I I- KOMOHANA ST 160 .1 -2 T 2- 35 7 -2 I r• 610 - 1:2 .2 s 760 --, c) 24-.2 0 CO Pon all awai 280 --# c) c) c) 350 -- Lo 405 I. - '-'• - 15 1 '-- - N" 175 -1 2 F4 ,r-- 10 ...-' 2..n CA MOHOULI ST KUKUAU ST MOHOULI ST KUKUAU ST to makai to makai to makai to Irtak.a i AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR • . . EXISTING 2009 TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 2 ,_ , . State of Hawaii Department of Transportation Traffic Count Station Data • • 10/26/2020 15 Minute Report =DOT Pim 5' Ir. ,A,-..);,_:;.: _ 1. Run Date:2a'ncra0 State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways Division , 15 Minute Volume Report Silo ID:0711940001.14 Town:HaWoii DIR I: ,MP 1 Functional Class:URBAN COI LEC FOR Count T cc CLASS Counter rule DIR 2: 418'+ RFout No: 9" Type: Type: Route Nu: 1,-n.', -Location DATE 14-DEC-16 j AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00.09:00) DIR 1. DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00.19:00) DIR I D162 TOTAL j IWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIREC110NAL PEAK AM-PEAK'FIR TlME 5715 AM 10 08 15 AM PM PEAK LIR UME 4,15?MI,,,415 PM AM PEAK 8R VOLUME -344 916 1,270 PM PEAK HR VOLUME 311) 510 to AM-K IACIOKCILI EV PM K FACTORI%51 • -15 AM-D(•%) 27,87 1'2.1 1 100 PM 0,591 50.16 39 5? ,,gy DIRECTIONAL PEAK 17I9(000001:PEAK AM-3)557 HR TIME 02,15 AM SUC4L15 AM 0700 AM in 08410 AM PM PTAK LIN TIME 4:39 P51 to 530 PM .r l'.t'3.1 •5;•t,; AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 35.1 927 PM•P11.37 HP.VOLUME 812 536 - AM PERIOD(3000-12410) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL- PM PERIOD(12:00.24:00) DIR I DIR 2 TOTAL IWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK•NR'11ME 07,15AM to 03.1.5 AM, PM-PEAK HR TIME .1-15 PM In 51t FM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME -354 440 1,270 PM-PEAK 1111 VOLUME 810 1112 ;0,, AM K1400806)6) - 8.01 PM-K FACTOP,(6:) C:12 AM=D0%1 27.117 72.13 100 - PM 01%1 La 18 79,02 '1111 I NON COMMUTER PERIOD(0700-157003 DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-4-01,12-HR 24--HR PERIODS DIR I DIR 2 TOTAL 1 1120 DIRECTIONAL 1'EAK AM 6 HP.PERIOD(06:610'12;001 1060 1.1141 71 PEAKHR-IML 1.45 PM to 2.45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD 03-0-00-12'00) 7..333 .1711, - PEAK 118 VOLUME 483 563. 1.040 PM 6 LIR PERIOD 02:00 18:00/ 3,442 2,5'75 417 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PER100112:50 24;001 4,985 4 2411 PEAK HR TIME 2.00 PM to 3:00 PM 1:15 PM to 2:15 PM 2.1.190 PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 7,315 a 071 15. ' PEAKHRVOLUML 506 574 D% 4017 5301 ..., TIME-AM ,D1i71 018 2 TOTAL TIME•AM MR DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR! DIR 2 TOTAL TIME•PM DI R1 01R 2 TOTAL 1200 12.1-5 15 10 25 116:00.06:15 02 30 146 12560-12-15 139 106 243 n 00 03.i• ,1 193 su 12:15.12.30 9 10 15 06:15-06:30 4? 137 179 17-15-12.30 107 717 22-1 1. ) Ii,., 1,;1 , 12:36-12:45 ri is 14 06:30-0045 71 167 235 1230-12:45 113 124 237 0 115 4•: 12:45-01:00 6 9 11 06:45..,07:30 75 195 270 1245-111)411 96 130 226 05 1' C:-::± 01:00-01:15 12 15 0):00 07;15 67 199 266 01.00-UL15 107 118 225 07007 01 P, ' 01:15-0130 7 9 (2 07;10-0730 96 229 379 01-15-0130 93 137 230 07 15 ..,3, 110 01-30'01:15 17 3 8 07:30;07:45 93 255 149 01(10-01145 95 135 231 57 71; 07, 1,1 01:45=.02'00 6 10 07:45-08.00 81 243 324 01.45-02:00 110 155 275 (I 41 08'0017 135, 02:00•:02•.15 4 a 0 08.00-08.15 34 180 272 0203-02 15 126 131 263 01150 1:5 15 %:4 11:7 02415-07130 7 1 10 0811 08-30 70 176 254 02-15 02311 113 12.1 236 00 11 as.,,,,, . - 0290.02:45 5 13 x.`•3'30-2&•10- 61 163 . 249 02:30 02'45 134 1 -15 111 772 59 30 14 :_ 0145-03,00 1 9 10 03'45-09:30 90 187 277 02.45 03:00 133 - 1311 234 0!..15 119 00 '•7 11., 0100-.03:15 3 0 3 0906.09:15 81 129 710 03.00 03515 149 1711 27.1 39.20 09.1: 777 03.15-0330 7 4 11 04,15-09:30 81 133 211 03:15-03'30 15-3 120 174 09 15-09.43 `1+ ii,..... 0330,03915 4 9 13 09:30-05145 82 127 209 03:30-,03:45 161 84 245 08 3'..05.45 -p1 , 03:5-IM DO 11 10 05-45-1000 98 M9 247 03:15 04 00 161 124 285 119)5- 170.7 __ 04:01)--04;10 5 19 24 1000 16 10 15 0 143 243 04 011 0415 159 109 278 1000.101' 5 34 3 ,., 04:15-04:30 4 14 16 13-15 1030 57 134 731 04-15 01-30 177 147 324 10 15 10 01 4, 44 1_ 04-30'0.:45 13 25 30 1030 1045 97 139 236 0.130 01915 216 519 335 1030 1141 7, '61:45-05:0 18 23 41 1445 1100, 6-1 14/ 231 043S 05:00 219 WS 361 1 S 11 uQ _, ,� .., •05:00-05-15 70 20 40 1130(1 11-15 129 128 251 05.(11) 1)91.5 196 122 370 11 711 ,1 1, 37 3 05915.05;30 7.0 39 til 11-15 1130 94 138 232. 05:10 05:36 179 327 305 11 -i-. . 05.30-05:40 26 73 99 11:30 1145 129 113 242 05:30 0045 131 97 <<229 I1 , -45 0: 22 .1r 05:45-06-00 33 39 122 1141 12:00 54 132. 222.6 05.45.05.00 162 121 233 11 2,,, hN/pdc07:80801ords/f?po10118;60245006411676_:NO•RP;P8_COUN T_NUt>4E3ER.P8_SURVEY_DAY:81956.14 1:2 10/26/2020 15 Minute Report _ 1-DOT Rip.. 3 Ic. Til` i --m u - ... - , 'Run Data:26-007-20 State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Sita ID:(1717L74000144 Town:H4wa1, DIR 1: .MP 011121-431` (mat AADT' I L. 7. Functional Class:URBAT4COLLEOIOI7 Count Typo:Cl ATE Counter Type; lubc n oP.hu. Location: DATE: 1S-DEC-16 - . AM COMMUTER PERIOD(OS:00-091001�� - -��DIR 1 - -_- •�� DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00.19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK. TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM,PEAK HR 1DME 07:15 AM 1008'15 AM PM PEAK 14R TIME 4411 PM to 590•''.41 AM PEAK HR VOLUME 330 965 12215 PM PEAK.HR VOLUME. 717 cr .. AM-"K FACTORI3(i E-04 PM•K 124..11711. AM.01%) 25.49 7452 101 - PM Dtna 5988 537 14 DIRECTIONAL:PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 177:419 AM r,Opi,3A61 07:75 AI1,7109:15 AM 93,7 PEAK HO TIME 4110PM to 5:30 PM •I 041 P7.1,,r 151=1 AM EfAK(1(1 VOLUME 343 96` PM-pCAK1(3W7(1,IML 777 . 'AM PERIOD(0000.12:00)- -__..._ _.__-- DIRT �. �� DIR 2 W„..,,..-- TOTAL - _-PM PERIOD(17:00-24:00) _,_„___ -- DIR 1 DIR 2 70100 .TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO 010E1 OE/NAL PEA); AM=PEAK HR TIME 07,YAM 010815 AM PM PEAK HR 11M11 340 PM to 5 )PM AM-PEAT.HR VOLUIdE 130 461 1,21S PM PEAK HR VOLUME 177 AM-K IACIOAI i 0.04 - PM K FAC 1011''}; sAl.1-01%) - 25+3F; .7452: 1.0(1 PM 0,917 59..101 11114 HON COMMUT€P.PERIOD(09:00.15,00) DIR 1 DIR 2 ' TOTAL 6-HIT,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR I DIR.) TOTAL . TWO D1REC11019A1 PEAKAMA-HT1.PERIOD II7APCI-12,T10I 20.53 1 1109 5747 P10(113 TIME. Zan PM to 3300 FM AM 12-717I PERIOD 9570 V.712 00) 3 424 3..303 5,," PEAK HR VOLUME 517 513 1,030 PM 6 HE PE0015012137-70:007 1.47) 3.73' DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12.11P PERIOD(17'0(024001 5.165 4401 _-.. PEAK HR TIME 2 01 PM to 101 PM 3935 AM 10 1015 AM 24-11R PERIOD 112 UJ 24.031 7`-93 4 04- PEAK HR VOLUME S 17 576 D'V 47.7.54 17 dr. :. . TIME.•AM 0311 0111 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIRT DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIRT 01112 TOTAL TIME-PM 0111 DIV 2 TOTAL 1200. 12,15 12 9 _71 01110.0015 44 107 151 12.x7-12:15 117 1II ?15 0i70-;7 Cu 1S "1 .. •- 1215-12`30 15 12 21 06:15-06:30 47 116 163 17.15 12:30 1.1: 116 252 DO 15-03,3B .. <. :. 1730-13-45 11 10 21 05730-06-15 75 155 230 1230 121440 107 109, 216 03309 00 45 --. .' .. 17.49 01101. 10 6 16 00.15 0700 71 168 239 1.145-01:00 94 11,3 227 0(145 0127' 01;00.01:15 7 6 13 1171)41 07-11 81 192 211 11100-DPL' 115 1.34 249 0/.00 L'12 •I". '7 01,15-0100 7 10 07'15 0700 70 244 31-1 0115 01.30 110 141 266 III 15 3;7. - ,L .01:30.0745 3 5 13 11 90 0'145 07 260 357 01'40-0145 113 138 15.1 Of-. - 7 -2 117 01'45.02:00 6 u '12 37.10 08:00 95 243 331) 01-45 02.011 98 140 748 0/45 (0/ill, 1731 0240-02:15 A 9 0800 0315 60 218 020 0210-02.75 11? 113 225 96361 0-i 15 : - 116 0215-0230 4 3 4 110:15 03:30 ' 12 179 251 (1215 3230 114 154 272 06.15 1...., 7. 5.i 1.1. 02730-02:45 3 - Ii '.12630 0845 78 170 756 02'.30-V41.4.5 144 115, 259 (,77 11) 111: 53 .02:45--0300 , 7 14 0045 09:60 87 183 765 0245 1)3:00 147 127 274 (794', I. --, 030 03.15 9 3 73 • 09'00.0915 65 142 207 03-00 03.15 -152: 140 292 09011 09 I', 7. -1 - 03,15-03:30 S 4 9 '09:.15.09.30 82 1217 208 337 5.0310 171 177 3087'15 7a 17' 34 43 .. 03:30 0315 3 9 12 17330 0945 93 139 232 01(0 01.45 171 131 302 3J 1el 33 .:I 32 . 0345 0410 7 10 13 09:45.1.000 66. 1114 4.04 03'45 16300 154 116 771 99-11 1910+ `,I 04:00-C4.15 1 14 20 10:00-1015 101 145 241 0400-04.15 179 135 11,1 111,3, i_ if li.ir c'2 04:15-•0733 9 71' 19 10:15 10311 94 117 . 211 Phi I5 17430 1159 131 3700 11) 7 to 01 - 4130-01.45 I? 17 39 10.3-111.19 Au - 136 17,0 1110 Dl>45 176 14! 373 10 05 11'.1. 1 -. 11:45:05.00 12 77 45 1045. 1100 111 107 7.171 0445 US0,1 ,.,395 171 317 i,345 11;5', 7 . 05:00-05:15 _ ?i _'_ 11.,X! 11,15 111 727 '115 05-00.09:15 -1513 1,7 303 1109 71 I`, .t ,.. 05;15-05130 29 0-9 -1115 1151 116 119 `315 K-S.15 05.30 21)7 142 - .145 771`, - 1,. I' 09-30•35'.45 32 93. 90 11-30-17:45 123 110 233 9530 05.41 143 • lila t 2137- `1+I ,-... ,C 00-45-0400 47 61 12.1 16. 5-1203 137 130 733 054516/0 13(1 127 2811 11.17 1- 1 - I hwypdc07:8080/ordsIf?p=101:8:6024500641675::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SURVEY DAY:81986.15 142 10/26/2020 15 Minute Report Hcicfr Rovls Tcal . st,-tv.,f, , •._..- Run Dl- 6-00520 State of Hawaii,Department.of Transportation.Highways Division ,a 2 15 Minute Volume Report - .. .. skarn:671194000144 Town.,Hawaii DIR I: ,73/1 DIR 22 MO Final ARM: 1,'1,.' .Ponclional Ciar.v UREAN'COLI,ECTOR Count Type:CLASS Counter Type: Tutu: Runt,-Nu 161, Locations DATE,310111L-17 _ ... AM COMMUTER PERIOD 035100-119,00) DIR 7 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15500-1950M DIR 1 DIET 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM PEAK EIR TINIE 0800 AM to 0100 AM PM PEAK Hil TIME 5.1515-I to 5 li PM AM-PEAK I-1R VOt LIME 347 994 1,341 7111 PTAK 10.1 VOLUME 01,5 7.851 1 071 AM- FACTOR3164 7.79 . PM-K 175,54047(71) ,-2 AM-016,4 25.0K 74.12 100 PM 0,90 6033 49 1, DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PTA!, AM-PEAK HR TIME 05.00 AM ft,09350,nm 01308 AM to 09:00 APO Pm-PEAK 1-111 TIME 5.15114(0 9.11,P1.1 I s 714 6, A11-PEAK 1-1/3 VOLUME 347 9114 . PM-PEAK LIR VOLIJME 313 092 , .. AM PERIOD(0(046-12:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:90) DIR I DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM PEAK HR TIME 03,15 ANI 7.9 09.15 AM PM 70311 143 11AIL 515 PM 10 1,15 6/3 AM•PEAK FIR vOLumL 379 423 1,3W PM PEAK MR VOLuMI 973 q1) 1 01' AM-1.:FACTORNi 1,919 PM-KFACTOR(%1 1..!';-:.f• AM--DM) 25118 74.12 100 Pm Droll 17.083 1711 NONCOMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15004 DIR) 01117 TOTAL G-HR,12-HR 24.1-IR PERIODS DIR 7 DIR? TOTAL • TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-110 PERIOD 409.00-12,00; 1.561 47,59 PEAK HET TIME 09-00 AM to 11300 AM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12_00; 7,134 4,617 PEAK HIT VOLUME $21 719 1,142 PM 6-HR 209100(12:00 15:001 1,610 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12 HR PFP1OD)12,00-24:00/ 5 555 0,105 1'001 PEAK 1113 TIME 0..45014 In 1A5 PM 09:00 AM to 112:021AM 24 Ell(PERIOD 512.0U-24:09j 6019 9,133 7710 PEAK HR VOLUME 535 719 DR 46 55 51-12 .PI, TIME-AM DIRT DIR 2 TOTAL TIME•AM 0161 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM 0164 D1R 2 TOTAL TIME'PM 171111 01 a 2 10100 12:00'12,15 32 22 54 06 00 06:15 14 20 34 12:00 12:15 121 128 249 0000 85,:5 152 12:15-12:30 37 14 46 65-15-06;30 73 -16 69 - 12 15 12:30 115 155 270 05 1 i 59.17 6 1 !I.,' 75-4 12:30'12.45 24 20 44 06-30-06:45 40 55 95 (7:30-12:45 122 114 235 06 30 09-15 170 :,..6 783 12:45-01:00 21 11 37 06.45 07:00 33 Si', 113 1745-0105) (7') 125• 264 u62-2,5-5;00 1-14 .!'516 05-00-011 5 13 1.1 21 0700 07,15 al 96 134 01911-01115 147 1.36 763 07.00 1113 514 117 7715 07%15 01:30 7 12 19 07.15-07:30 42 151 199 01:15 0130 134 133 267 (1115 0131, 115 1.'3 01:30-31:45 14 a 22 07.30-07515 7C 202 272 01,30 01:40 175 121 246 5730 0745 170 111 ''1 01:45-02,00 a a 14 07:45-00:00 72 166 236 n1:45 12:00 109 162 268 01-15 35(15: 17.3 .53 21, 02.00 0215 5 9 14 09.00-08.15 75 209 234 02:00 02:15 178 105 264 0150 09 1, 137 154 02:15 02:60 II 5 16 01315 0830 63 253 330 02.15-07 30 190 151 20I rm,s oq::,..., 51, rj3 112.: 02.30-02449 7 4 17 2.0:39-0a:4 S. ay 256 355 0236--112:15 132 160 242 (10-50 00 4'- IV, V( 1240 02:45 03:00 5 5 15 20-45-09.00 100 266 350 02.45 02.35) 177 152 209 119-11, 1:511:,: .75 1.45. 01.00-0315 2 4 ,.% 1271133-05-15 107 044 301 03.00 63 IS 191 123 254 0300 54l'; ,,,, -.7 14.4., 073:15:03;30 3 0 a 00535-09 36 101 169 292 03:15-123:30 135 104 294 06115 :0151 /2 1„6 0330 10345 a ... 12 0030-04:40 99 163 262. 03:30 03,45 124 114 - 258 09:1,1 0-os 1. ,E, 7 iki 03:45-0407 4 3 7 0045-30.00 114 113 28/ 09.40 051-051 135 120 260 611451 11610 ,.,, 41 00 041:00•04:35 5 I a 1900-1015 135 173 254 04:00 04.15 1611 12.3 277 .11071 I SI'. 44 IS 04:15--04,30 5 0 11 1910-1030 97 147 244 04,15-04-311 ISO ;22 200 :0 11 '0': 40 0430,-,0645 9 7 IS *3(1.10:4 5 59 10! 255 01:32-04.-15 2)15 147 337 10 30 10.5"... -4' %4 0445-05.00 7 13 30 1(935-11:00 90 149 /45 04.45 05.90 192 1-1,7 516 10:40 ,101. 56 10 03 0500-05:15 5 18 23 11 rya 71.15 114 100 276 65.09-05 15 213 135 - 35? ituu ii;-,. , ,0 5151 0515-0530 13 17 30 11:15 1130 71 131 202 05.i 5 05.30 213 ISO 371 11 15 11.10 ,. .44 05,30-05:45 12 79 37 11-30 11-45 93 141 214 05.30-05AS 25-1 153 7107 1900 11 90 ", 7,,, 05 45-(16D0 1/ 25 12 11 45 LIDO 104 159 263 05515-06.9.1 223 135 355' 1140 12 99 7.: 23 55 , . . . . • . . • . . . hwyptIc07:8080/ordsll?p=101:8:6024500641676::NO:RRP8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8SURVEY_DAY:32874,31 122 j- „. 10/2612020 15 Minute Report 3 i-Q 1 i viii: S i :,3;- _'011" -,7 .. Run Darr.26,0C1,20 State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways Division ` 1S Minute Volume Report Site 10:3711940,30144 Town:Hawaii 0101: +MP DIR 2: 34" 41,wl AA01:. I,...... EOncUorK,l Class:URRAN:COILLCIOR taunt Type:CLAS Counter Type:Tube Route.No . Location: DATE:31•JUL-17 - . ..,,......_,...,_ AM COMMUTER PERIOD.435:0046:001 DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(1S:00.19:001 DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK - TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM.PEAK HR TIME 031013 AM to 09:00 AM PM PEAK 110 T13& 5.15 PM to 6.15 PM . AM-PEAK HR VOLUME .347 094 1,3-11 PM-PEAK HR VOLUbt 713 495 ..- AM K.fAC1004r,l 7 79 PM-K 6AC101313 7 • AM-307631 :.7588 74.12 100 PM-[1771 60884. 33'' DIRECTIONAL.PEAK DIRECIIITNAI.:PEAK AM,PEAK MR l0,1E 73.6(17,1,0 to 091111 AM 0800AM 100959 AM PFt-11040119 111.11. ',IS I'M to.5 15 PM AM-PFA/t.HR VCR LIME 33/ 994 PM PEAK HR VOLUME 9I4 504 AM PERIOD Mao- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12,00.24:00) DIR 1 OIR 2 TOTAL. TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK - 1':N0 DIRECTIONAL PEAK - 1 AM-PEAK HRTIME 33;14 AM 1o11215 AM P1,1 PE1.1,11R 10.44 5IPM to I.IS 9h1 'AM--PEAK 4313XOLIIME 339 '123 1,358 PM 0E66 HR VOLUME 94 0,1 -t AM-K FACIORI*( 1.09 PM K IAC101.6c AM.D3%I 2589 74.12 100 PM.14111.E.) 6083 3'117 .- NOCOMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:001 0110 1 DIR 2 _,�.... -YT�_ N TOTAL N 6-HR,12-HR.24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 ",'OTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6 HR PERIOD 166 00 12010 1.861 1100 ..",. , PEAR HR.TIME 0500 91.1 to 11200 AMAM 12-ILP:PERIO010000 1:2'00/ 2134 x.030 PEAK HR VOLUME 423 714 1,142 PM 6-1-IR PI RI0D:1200.IR41 1. .31.18 3 303 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 17 HO PERIOD/17.00.34:00) 1,885 i 1.361 ' PEAK HR TIME 1145 PM to 1515 PM 09:00AM to 11200 AM . 24•61R PERI on 212-00 24001 8,0+19 3.1 So PEAK FIRVOLUM( S35 715 D'R:. 36.55 `-'34' TIME"•AM D1R1 01112 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR1 0192 TOTAL TIME-PM 01111 DIR2 TOTAL TIME.PM DIR1 DIR_ 10161 1 12'60-1215 37 22 5-1 110.17-06.15 14 20 34 1206 1715 121 128 249 06 4ti 1.15 .• -5 17.40-131130 32 34 ifs 06:15 30630 22 40 85 12 15-12;30 115 1.55 2711 Lk,11 (4,'4. _. 1230 12:45 24 20 04 20,30-0645 -10 55 05 12.30 1745 122 1 i1 136 4.0 30 114 4.. , 17.45-.61410 21 13 32 05:45 07:00 33 90. 113 12'45-01:00 129 125 281 3:1-1; "1,•', -1 01:00.01:15 13 34 27 07:00'07:15 30 98 134 9100-91.15 147 136 2.91 31 UO L,1, i." ,I I 7740 ,' 01.15''01'30 7 12 19 071115,07'32 42 157 199 71.15 0130 134 137 282 0 _0..>_ 110 ' -0140.01:45 14 3 22 07:30 07:45 - 70 202 272 9130 (11:45 125 121 246 0739 01 47 11; ' 1 --Sn .01145•0100 11 14 11145 00123 7,7 1621 7.35 01,45 0200 1044 102 266. 7. 11 00 0200-02;15 5 9 14 08:00-07.15 75 209 283 02:121 02.15 128 156 284 08700 178, .,, 02,15-0230 11 5 16 08:15-0330 01 7.53 316 02:15 02,30 114 III 251 001, 0,.2 _ 1n., 0230 02-45 1 4 11 09:40.01045 933 256 355 6230-0245 132 156 292 02-,.'l 0,:,.4'. .. .: "..1!;, 0/45-03.00 9 3, 15 0845-09 W 1011 260, 366 62.45-9339 127 142 299 ❑9 3'1106 .1 89, 03;00'-03a5 $ 0 15129-0413 107 194 301 03.00-03:19 III 123 251 116 01 '75 7.10 03, 4,03;t5:03_10 3 ., 5 (23:15.01:30 101 133 292 03:15-191.10 135 144 799 05 t 6 22.,.1.', -• 01430-03.45 9 - 12 K31'1 05i45 . 99 - 161 262 0330-03;45 124 134 259 09 20 04 26 55 39 03:45•04:00 4 1 7 09.45 10.00 11.1 173 297 03.45,14,91 135 125 20 (75431 1057:1 .. V! 04.00.10•415 , 3 8 1060 10 15 E6 178 264 161 08-114.15 145 17.5 277 1000 13 I', 5'l 0.7:15•0.130 5 ,. 11 10 IS 10330 97 147 244 0435-11.1317 159 17,7 2811 1015 1211e9. 04:30-04'45 _ 18 10 1:3 1: .10 1045 95 157 293 ( 0. 1.45 205 137 337 ! I' _3,- - -' , 41:45-05.40 �r II 20 10'45-11,00 - 56 149 245 41.45 '75011 152 144 336 10-15 10 1,2 .. . „ 0500.05:15 5 19 :"i 11"657 1115 114 162 3721 09.011 0.5.1 5 213 139 352 !11.111 !'.', .. _ .., 05`15-0530 12 11 10 'I1'1S 1130 71 131 202 0515 11590 213 158 371 1113 11 6, _ 0530-05:•15. 11 25 37 11:30 11:45 93 141 234 0531, 0545 254 153 407 1 11.11. 0545-Ov:00 17 p5 42 11 45 12.09 104 159 2E3 65'45 02.01, 723 134 358 1.'05 1.2 n+; .. .hwypdc07:8080/ordslf?p-101:8:6024500041676::NO:RP:P8_COLlNT_N UMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY_32874,31 1/2 .i1 I•'b•LBZE:Ab4 A9ArYIST8d'M7eAnNT.NfO3 3d'd21:0411":9L91-t79004pZ09:8=r0t=ULJIS1110/0809:000PdSmy. t. `3's - '.1 74"II 999 501 oto 00:90.56.50 ISO ort 101 0071 SL'tt /.S OC L1 0000-5F30 i I' II .4I II 09e SEL 0E2 56-50 06'50 977 LEI L6 574I 00-19 91• 42 It 5630-0£50 ='1 "+ 1 5i.L 1 171 161 0131 0750 5130 1,91: 051 9.411 041-51415 60 61. 91 0E:50-51400 '9 r4 Ia on Li 929 911 010 5150.(0160 1194' 051 Oil 51:11-00=14 _1 9i 9 5150;0050 I-' `'i- 1 i L ,:'i'1 692 171 991 0050 5960 99Z 091. 60L 011 LL 50:01 10 61 L 00:50.5769 q„,. ;601 RE01 0049 911 7911 S14O-9E30 100 191 90 5001-0E411 - E1 1 9 07:19-09190 ",- I.: on41 510, LIF 591 911 091-0 5110 050 801 001 06401 5101 Cl 6 6 0019 5140 6i _4 1.101 9,011 097 611 '0C1 01:0-0000 977 001 901 .510 l 0001 Z! 1 S SL:lO 06:60 I i 1u +''+.l!'.I 5660 992 1114! 1901 001,9 51•:66 15Z 1131 .Otl ' 411761 56060 E 9 i (101.11 5760 ON i 0.917 (LZ 911 9E1 SC-F0-0f:90 592. 109 iso 50.60 06.60 L 9 9' 57:00-01.90 • 4.16 . 111:61) 5:-60 6SZ 611 004ELI Of�40 5Lf0 991 911 01,60-59-110 01 E /. DFCO-SI:FO • '160-0990 197 001 261_ 5.190 00:90 919 611 2011 51-60 091,0 EL. 1.. o 5190-011'90 ... ,,-.1!:-:0 010 047 117 691 0010'56'00 565 697 4641 0060 50=80 I I 0 9 00:50-S7.00 .< ". 1 10 r,10 097 9111 1071 56:20 00.00 069 1,6,7 96 5600 00:90 71 9 11 5670 Or00 X1`'1 '-• „-,1'80 4107 9401 06 0E7.0 51-20 099 012 06 09.00 01130 9 - 1 01.:20-51190 • £61 "' - ,:'P' oe 130 0194. cot Lti 51.110.00.20 SEC 649 16 51911 00.90 91 5 11 51,20.00.70 '+,'t .0's- 5670 99? CLL I6 0020 5410 160 600- 09 00-90 5690 EL 9 L 00:20.56:10 ' s..-.:-.I 0E401 Ca 1191. LZt 96110•06.10 962 817 (1 5700-(16.00 E1 1. 11 9090-0710 I.'IZ C i II.10 51:17 961 1FL S11 110)0 5110 Y0Z 051 65 09 tO-SI-O 2Z 9) 9 0510...5110 t,: Fi -I 1 - COLO 640E 171 151 5110-1,6010 •.91 101 111 11.10 0010. 00 6 a W10-.001i6 _, 0 56:90 955 471. 041910)-56.21. 691 96 00 00.1.0.06'90 5.9 1) 61 00=90-5009 14 4; LI' - 09 90 297; 001 621 5774-02.21. 901 • 99 06 5640-0E=90 09 EL 97 SO'ZI.-07.21 . 1P111 i ,4 57.90 409 91, 91.1 0l?1 Iii.. I 91. 66 99- 0E-9'0-51?{i 69 41 05 0171-5121. �P. 9'=1 _ - 1 I19 90 9911 4-91 091 51,01:0071 (0 00 29 51:90-DON 66 94 99 SL71.0023 10 int '0010 1010 VJA'36:11. 10101 019110 92110 116-31111 199,0,9 Z1110 17710 HIV•31011 17101 21110 1010 1119.11911 ''t 75 110"!0 2.0 ZSL 05 9099101 OH A1/96 11 1: 015 150.0 (00.1Q-00713 001031 11-60 11000:011 41.019 01'60 lid 904 9.c%3 01-0 31911 811 11036 -. 549'6 260'! 100:42-00:Z1)t3OI11JO E9'91011 . - "9090-lON011038i0 i. ._.1 F, 095'9 0291.60471)7101931"001-9641d 1'91'1 9 1110 50 III' ,11940NIA 71903,3 11159 L<r 1167 10071!010010010300H-Z1 NIV INV O0211II,W600-50 31NLL011 0038 1166 E 0007 10051-00,9(0 9101004 149-9149 XVI!1'N0103810 OW. 10101 01119 L lila 50018368H•6211N'0 I-111-109 11{101 Z 810 11310 {00:51.'00:60100903611311115111110]NON 1111_. ____._ 111,1___.__- __.__ ..___._._.�-_1111.._._..__ _111,._,_ -- _ "' 141;5 1£•?', IF1(1 Wd 1111. 017! 0000 1110 W0 17100140.)9-lid 5911 _ (%)90130.40-'IV (410 790 311111040991119-7,1-lid 0961 094 901 369113040199 0998-011{ I'll 749/1190 Si.; 31011 tHaVJJ kid 0991)&6001+0007-90 011)111011919-I SV 5091 1VN011J3ILO 01111. 919919N0113321I0 091 1010.1 Z 4110 1.090 (00:9-0-00101)001113.3996 19101. 0 2110 L 810 -(0071-00:00)0011736 VW --- 111,. . _.._ _.,-.� 1C 4'01 3107,10409148910-119 1004 1141 ,il•'Ir1iOAH1304/3d'W9 .., ..'a 11„yq 01901.00109,49 9 119118'14031 lid 01000:60011'190000 INV 006001 NV 00.90 - .3W11.0H093d•INV 41039 1VNOI1)11110 591,3 1VNOIL77810 151'. 15'04 '59471 191 9).01 214! 0100? .(16)9) 119 :s-0}90IJ9J J! 119 5917 • l'tolt1013Vl31 019 . " s - L99 10Jf;lOA8(1 0931 lid 001,t 1601 I'M 51'9 01 NJ 515 - 31111 fill;1099 1110 100 11'Jf11Of109 9939- W9 WV CV60 01.ryVC>'J�5'0 71111 HH 9,739'iNV MV3d"19N0I.010IO OM.L 0113,-1990103010 OM1 164101 0 810 - L 010 100=61-0016 I)O0183d 031790 WOJ Vid 1N.L.01 01310 L 4110 (00l60-00:50/0011136 7911131.90100)6W 11•9fV•1.0 3,9640 - .1lo9'u0'1 ,..1 -ON-'In049 09449 1a06119 0903 55013:01612uno0 11OIJi1lOYNVOHO 1m0P uoo uul" :9-..-. ,l4IVV Iruli 1161-10010 JI14 11 810 "11-0H(010411 661000061119-:0101111 11eda i awn(on alflUMI 51. 11olsiAla s1A6M4b)I•I'UO(le).Jodsuclj 30 3U011J13CdaG'11eMe}{10 03005 00 1,30'9?=0100 04110 i i I„ "44(4.17c4'I l: C,1H )J©daa cinu(W 9t OZOZ/9V0I. 10/26/2020 15 Minute Report HOOT OT f;i - 3'1.1(, , : s': : . , Run Dale:26.OLa.10 State of Hawaii.DeplrtMent of o VolumTranse ortatiReport'Highways Division Site ID:871154000144 Town:11414•4:, DIR 1: .MP DER 2_. M:' Final ROOT Ic:.4. functional Class:URBAN COLLET.TOR Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:101No :41.1 location; DATE: 20-NOV-18 '• .. _2_222_. _ 22_2-._��..._,.-._- ---- ..., -..___._._ AM COMMUTER PERIOD(00:O0-09:00) DIR 1 D1R 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00.19:00) DIR 1 OIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL.PTAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07 00 AM to 073:00 AM PM-PEAK`IP.1(125 4 15 PM to 5 15 i'P:I AM-PEAK HR VOLUME .. 1,124 1,565 PM PEAK HR VOLUME 916 • -' • • AM••K FACTOR(%i • 8 93 PM K EACTORISO) ` ANL-USM) 28.36 71 64 100 71,1-011.1 61 1, 33 4 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEA.([ AM PEAK HR TIME 0701 AM to 08200 AM 07:05 AM to 0800 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME .1'311 PM 10530 PM :.15 PM ro•t=S 1971 AM PEAK HP.VOLUME 445 1,124 PM-PTAK HR VOLUME 932 -'I' _ I x) AM PERIOD(00:00.1210 •------^__^� DMR 1 0182 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00.24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL . TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PLAT: AM.PEAK HR TIME 0700 AM to 06 00 AM PLA-PEAK HP,TIME 4.15 PM to 5 15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 445 458 1.569 PM-PEAK HE VOLUME 516 337 1 °' . AM-K TACK/REM 893 PM•K PA11004161 .I. i 1011 PM DES:.) fll r$ 2834 71.64 .. -AM D(`b�l - ' _ �__..-___2,2,_22.--.._.-........._.__-__-- 222.2_._- _22.22.._-._-. ._.-2222----'-- -F _...............-_,._.__._ .. . .. NDN COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-10:00) 03111 D1R2 TOTAL 6.1.01,12-HR.2.•H R PERIODS DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL 'TWO 0191C110544I.PEAK AM 6-1tR P4810010600 12.000) 23.76 PEAK HR TIME 1.30 WART 2.45 PM AM 12-HR 1411100 0813.12.310: 2,637 125'4 '1'1 PEAK LIR VOLUME '120 654 1.774 PIA 6-HIS PERI00 311000-18.00) 4,155 4,401 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12446 PERIOD El 2.00.2400 5739 .:501 PEAK HR TIME 1.00 I'M 111 2.00 PM' 1.30 PM to 2:30 PM 24-4311 PERIOD 112.00-2400l 8810 9.92/ PEAK HR VOLUME 622 65• 0% 47,62 52.39 ' ._..__.._--..___-.____._��.___....-_______2,2.22_ TIME-AM DIRT DIR2 TOTAL TIME•AM DUO DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM 01141 0382 TOTAL TIME-PM 0101 D46 2 TOTAL 1200-12.15 16 -7 22 116.00-06-15 48 108 156 12 00-11015 133 120 253 :19 09 00 15 •.,• ;39 3.31 12:15.12.35 8 1, 19 06'15-06,30 51 123 174 1215.12.30 131 135 266 0h 1•; n... 4 _. 1200 17:45 R 8 15 6630.06V5 80 165 245 12;30 1245 131 160 291 15,31) C_-.. :- .12:45 01160 II 9 17 06-45 070-5 9.3 201 300 12.15.0100 147 35-0 2513 U644 4170:. 1::. .--. ,,,•11 01110.01:15 6 I 7 01700 0745 107 236 343 01-07 01:15 138 157 295 0700 1.71,, 11'. -. 154' , 0115-01:30 4 I 5 07:15 07,.30 303 300 403 01'15 01-30 1131 132 253 01 I'• UT 4:' ., 01.30 01,45 5 4 9 '077'30 07.45 10/ 312 - A15 51'30 0145 160 154 3D4 n7+9 0'452 -.1 0145-02:00 3 3 1 07.45 0800 128 276 404 01.75 5140 163 127 340 01.1': 50'.. 02:00..02:15 7 2 5 0800 08.15 106 221 327 022.00'02.15 132 166 295 1,01,:: 961' ... 9 0215-02:30 4 5 9 0815-08.30 87 173 260 52 15 5130 165 151 322 08 10 95 TO :. I:- 02.30-02-45 8 3, 14 0830-0845 Et 14.1 275 0230-02.45 155 122 277 ❑8 301 178 4'. P; ., 02:45.03:00 6 6 12 0845-0900 06 198 284 07:45-04.(0 . 165 143 312 03 15 09 00 'I' ,3 03.00 0315 3 5 8 0900-0915 89 131 220 03;00 0310 150 125 275 • 09 00 rei;5 I I 301 3,3 0315-0330 5 5 IT 09:15-0930 56 154 25; 03:15-03:30 201 136 337 599 5 na 3311 3, 2. 03'30 03.45 6 17 23 09430 0915 91, 152 748 0330-03:45 15; 137 320 Si::-7 104'. -- ,. . 0345 81100 4 II 0945'1000 1174 187 241 0345 04:00 153 15-1 947 00.45 11160 :_ 0400-04.15 7 10 13 10,10-10,15 94 115 233 04.00 0415 101 147 348 10 011 PO l': . ¢715-04.30 n 15 11 29 1015..1030 116 177 749 04.15 0430 101 165 952 10 I: 5,97 .. 0130.04:15 14 ?..I i1,, 11 30-1045 9(1 144 234 0.1.09 0145 217 lib 365 10 1 1045 .9 (51.15 0500 II 34 SI 15445.1110 1223 - 146 169 0345 05.017 251 1.45 '111 (UI', 1'. -- 05:00.05:15 231 11 II 11:110-1115 ITN I i') 223 0500.05.15 259 178 377 4100 11'17 ;4 0515-05.30 29 33 72 11.15.11:30 106 125 201 05.15-0535 203 93 256 1115 1140 I.. 05:30-05 45 411 65 lOS 1 1:30-1 3245 125 107 302 05 30-05 45 174 133, - 310 I 1;0 n 44 2 - 0545-103(10 46 111 160 11 45.1200 136 13.4 252 0545 Cw00 154 128 262 1145 3;00 • .. _ hw pdc07:8080/olds/f?p-101:8:6024500541676::NO:P.P:P5_COUNT_NUMEER.P8_SURVEV_DAY:3754;,28 tt? 1 k. 10/26/2020 15 Minute Report trE t - ( Run Date:2010LT-20 State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways Division. 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID:071194000144, Torn:Hawai . n DIR 1: M. OIR 2: b!v Final AADI: -.5...,- Funolior1nl Uwe:URb!1N:CGLLECTOR Count Type:CLASS Counter Type: Tithe RouteNo; I E Location: DATE 29-NOV-18 I -__.__ _1_11_ - AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIP,I DIP 2 TOTAL ' TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DI(EC1 IONAL PEAK AM-PLAK Ilk TIME 1:115AM to 16.15 AM PM PEAK HR TIME 4-15 PM to 5.15 NO I AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 417 1,102 1,579 PM PEAK 140 5014411.0 917 :4 I AIA K FACTOR;%) 3.69 PM K IAC1OIQfi t i AM 01) 26.41 73,09 1CII PM'377) - 112,47 37 55 6- I DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAR i AM-•PEAK HR ELME 05:051Ant to 09.03 AM 07;15 AM to 08.15 AM PM PEAK LIR TIME 430 PM to 510 P7.1 40.1 21'.1,:0'.,.0,_.0 4 AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 421 1,162 PM-PEAK HP VOLUME 919 551, AM P611100(00;00-12:00) DIR 1 •DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(10:00.24:00) DIR 1 OM 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK 1570 DIP-ECTIO,uAI PEAR. 'AM--PEAR I-IR TIME 07-15 AM to 08115 AM PM-PERI;HR TIME 4:15 PM to 5.15 I'M AM:PEAK HR VOLUME 417 479 1,575 PM PEAK HE VOLUME 5.1'2 949 AM'K FAC100/s4 8 e9 Pnl-K 1657 4 101x:; 545 AM-DM) 28.11 7339 1 C PM-'4477 6247 ., 10555 NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00.15:001 OM 1 010.2 TOTAL 6-HR,12-HR.24-11R PERIODS OIR I 011.2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONA!P65L" AM 6 HR PERIOD 306'00-112.301 2,410 .1305 PEAK HR TIME 208 PM to 3:00 PM- AM 12 HR PERIOD 500.00-12:01) 721 4 11 5.359 PEAR HR VOLUME 600 639 1,325 PIA 6 H P174001112.00-10,091 4,318 DIRECTIONAL PIAK PM 10-HR PER100(12.802400) 11)01 1- PEAK HRAME ,4,00 PM to 300 P:1 0900 A61 to 112:00 AM 24 HR PE MOO,I2-IXI-24:05) 6,424 9,331 1 55 PEAR HR VOLUME 486 641 DIS 47.15 52 55 I:n TIME'-AM 01111 01112 TOTAL TIME-AM 0181 DIR 2. TOTAL LIME-PM 0I131 DIR 2 -TOTAL TIME•PM DIRT 1)1712 TOTAL 12.00 17.15 12 7 19 C6:00-06:15 49 84 137 12:00 12-15 136 122 258 361)0 10,1:, 6,.2 17-.5 289 12115-12:30 13 13 25. 06.15-0630 43 144 192 12.75 12:30 111 1211 260 (10.15 06.31.3 5 1,4 7751 12.30-17:45 10 5 I5 0630.--06145 13 191 264 1230 1745 88 148 236 09 10 06.45 1245-01:00 6 5 11 - 06'45-07:00 112 195 307 12 45 01;00 103 135 230 Ut;45 Ur(s: '" 47 01:00-.01:15 6 5 -i1. 5'700.07.15 100 256 356 01 00 01:15 107 125 232 t./01 21 '-t .• 01:15.01:30 9 2 11 0710-0730 114 299 413 01:15-01:.30 113 1.18 266 0 I I, :,, 0130-01:45 5 4 5 0730 177.41 93 295 388 0130 01,15 141 145 290 u7 20 ,1,-1.1'., '7. 11,7 , 0E45-02,00 4 2 6 07'45 08.00 102 307 409 01:45 0700 118 3.9 209 13745 00044 '.1 .-2 0700-02:10 1 1 11 05:00-08:13 '1313 261 369 0700 0715 135 157 291 04/0 119 17, ,1 1 J 149 02:15-02:30 4 6 10 08:1.5•08:30 115 212 323 02:15-0230 155 352 307 09 15 141 16 ,I 51 122 02:30-02.45 3 4 7 0830-08,45 51 101 272. 02130-0745 202 175 377 0911 0,445 ,. 11 11,1 .- 02.45-"03:00 11 5 16 - 0045-09:00 11 I 195 306 0745-03.00 190 1600 350 COY>90 .1•t 01:00..:03:15 3 ,, 11 59.00-09.15 86 140 237 03010-0:+:15 193 1835 329 0111.1 59.1511,i 31 01:15-03-50 3 , 5 8 09:15-09.30 103 159 267 0115-.0330 160 145 0325 0 15 09 50 47, 46 11,2 03,30..0140 9 10 16 113:30 07:45 65 172 263 ' 03:30 03915 229 11.1 54.3 05 3 35 1.3 60 01 03'45.01.00 5 10 15 03.45..10:00 110 164 274 03:45-0::00 211 1.94 345 TO 451 10'01 , 64 04.00-04:10 9 15 24 10113 1015 106 14-1 250 94:00-04:15 185 169 300 1009 10 15 41 01 '04:15-04130 13 13 26 10:15-10.39 98 130 228 51 0-01:30 Ivy 146 330 1117'. 1010 :2 51'. 04:50-04:45 / 24 31 10:30-10.45 118 150 7.68 04 311.04'455 241 17.5 .372 1030 0.-4'1 ;0 57 04:45,05:007 Tu -13 49 1045.1100 1318 135 250 1-.i5-0`,1113 241 1111 5100. t7145 11:711 4 4 ,3 05:00.09'15 26 30 56 11:00 11:15 122 774 7411 9509 0115 291 137 350 +1011 111. . 0515-0530 25 49 78 11:15.11-00 134 110 -2.18 0515 05;30 2513 )32 337 11 1 L. ;,t 05.30-05:45 59 113 11,30-11:45 100 119 219 05.30-05-45 189 122 308 71,59-1:,17 1 05:45-,06:00 55 101 7136 11:15-12.00 122 114 236 0545-0111'01! 161 104 265 1 1 5 'I ._ • hwypdc07:8080/orris/f?p=101:8:6024500641676::NO:R P:P8_COU NT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:37544,29 7/2 10/26/2020 15 Minute Report 'RurvDatc 26 OCT-20 State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation.Highways Division - 15 Minute Volume Report Site TM 671194066144 Taws:Hawn1 DI131: EMP DIR 2: 107 Ina AADT , functional Class:.00137+7 COL1ECKIIO Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tom Root,No; i .tacatiart; DAL 19-SEP-19 AM COMMUTER PER100 105:00.03700) 01101 11102 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:1701 003 1 DIN 2 TOTAL 37NO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO 0170611014,4.1'530 AM-PEAT HR TIME 0+:M t„01110)AM PM 00,40 HR TIME 74:151.03 10 PM AM-PEAT HRVOLUME 412 , 1.154 1,4006 PM-PEAKHR VOLUME '9136 7.12 •,- AMd-KFA3700) ) 9 13 PM K FAC7O0102 AM,0;181 2752 7248 LOO Pm 01%, 09/16. 40 1.7 DIRECTIONAL PEAK 132Rr.CTIO673 PEAK AM-PEAK HR.TIME 0045 17 07 4 5 AM 0706 to 111300 AM PM PEAK 110 TIME 04:15 to 0019 PM 0460 ro a;i,;104 Aho-PEAKH0901011E 459 1,164 PM'PEAK 110 VOLUM1 937 550 AM PERIOD(POc00.12:00) DiR 1 01112 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12;00-24,00) MR 1 DIR 2 101.41 TWO DIRECTIONAL.PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK. AM-PEAK HR TIME 07-00 to MOO AM PM PEAK HP TIME 04.15 to 45515 PPM AM PEAK HP55)L47ME 442 1.161 1310, PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 930 0.. AM-KEAC10RT-f 9.13 •PM K FAC1OI600 AM-0131 27 52 7245 100 PM 019_I 59 83 40 14 :, ...999:..9_ _-;_.,._........_ ,..-._..�._�__._W..._� --.:__,.:.-- NON COMMUTER PERIOD109,130-15:00) DER 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6•HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS 01131 0112 2 TOTAL `TWODIRECTIQIIAI PEAK AM 64111 PERIODiCk:40-121)01 7.376 4 099 PEAK HR-TIME 021.15 to 03.45 PM • AM 12 HP PERIOD 1017.00-12:001 7,61:4 -=.7 PEAK HR VOLUME 8018 598 1'3133 PM 6-1-911 PERIOD 112th?-1003 7 4,100 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-110 PE16003174K1 311112 5 787 a.,,}2. - '0' PEAR TER TIME 02.45 to 03145 PM 073010 113:30 PM 24-PIR P31.1.100. 123042460) 11441 9 150 PEAK HR VOLUME 006 032 031 4746 _.04 I,- TIME-AM 0101 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR1 DIR2 TOTAL TIME-PM 0181 D1R 2 ,TOTAL TIME-PM Di 01 030.2 TOTAL 1200.12.15 11 16 0o666-06:.15 50 113 169 1200-17.15 129 116 241 310120 14;:-_ ,t1•1 12.15-12:30 8 7 15 0015. 0630 57 170 2317 1215-17,77; 1211 113 234 06.15 ,14 - ' - 12:30 12-45 7 4 11 06510-0605 '11 189 280 1230-1245 132 141 273 06 30 01,3- - , .. 12715-01730 7 a 10 06:15-07:0 119 1121 3007 1245-01'00 94 15.1 248 7645 01'41 i.. 01413 01915 7 3 10 07.00-0715 117 257 374 0100 0515 117 17.7 244 117 07 07 t:-• 1..,., ., 12.' 01:15 01:30 7 1 07'15 0730 170 717 437 0145 01311 109 145 254 0715 61 30 ..9 01:30.-01:•15 9 2 11 07-10.0740 103 293 346 01-30.01;45 122 131 253 71. :.:,r ., 4„ 01'45-0300 3 ., 5 07'45 (170 102 297 399 111715 07410 143 €71 314 07 12 0,1 try .1 • . 02200-37315 S 1 6 0800-13315 100 219 310 020 6015 177 131 253 08 -5 18 . - 02115-0230 -3 '. 10 08:15 11000' 11)7 195 302 02'10-02.311 151 167 310 77 11 59 39 .77 0130-02,45 6. , 13 6010 08.10 91 155 246 033.30 02-45 176 107 .1i6 08 30 131.1. '^ , 01,- 02:45.03.60 02:45-03'60- 1! 6 II 08:45 000 'tri 162 250 02.4 73:19: 170 1S3 340 OO11, 010. • . .' 03,017 0315 13 5 11 03.00-179315 96 114 247 03'70.0015 193 144 337 449 07 06,.18 1 4, _ 371.15-013:334 3 4 , 07;13 09.30 90 149 239 07115 03:10 170 177 347 99 19 79)7 4' ., r., 03:30-03315 9 10 19 09:30 0045 92 158 250 63.10 0645 047 171 371 329 04 104', 1.1 03;45-04.00 5 12 17 6145 1010 167 157 254 03.45 13.100 213 146 359 1.1 14, I I 04/60-0.1:15 3 11 20 10,00 10.15 92 127 214 1241513 34.15 207- 150 367. 101.63 10'':- ,. 04'15.113;30 11 1.1 16 1415 1030 ' 1114 130 77.1 64'15 34 321 701 192 049 1015 10_- •-. 113:30;0445 18 r... 40 19.30 10:45 RS 144 735 0410 07'43 221 134 455 1712 14,4. r ,u. 04-45-0500 22 4r, So 10.4.5 11-.04 121 119 240 13.145 0514' ,r.` l 1033 439 1045 1+ 15. 7 t 0000'-0015 19 315 49 11 00 11:15 1411 116 2011 0500 0015 233 131 01,1 11004 :'0 19 30 3- 05:15-06:W 35 4 60 11:15 11,30 113 100 213 05.15-05 70 191 116 .319 1 1 1:. ' 4 0 47 05:30-05:45 44 07 173 11:30-1105 109 96 243 08.30-0045 176 176 3134 11 36 14' 1, ,2 054,06:59J 31 105- 156 11:35 12.00 100 114 222 0545 775-.07 182 t 24 2110 I I . ,205 hwypdc07:8080/ords/Rpe10'1:816024500641676':NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMRER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:39B67,19 1'2 t. [. 10/26/2020 15 Minute Report n Run Date:26-07-21 20 State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways Division , 15 Minute Volume Report , Site IPc R71194000144 Town!H4wa,t RIR 1: :SIP PIR 2' MP it nal AADj'. . Tunetlonbl dow URLA11 COLLE C1011 Count Type:CLASS Counter Type' lupe Rowe Fou. 1'}lp,' Location; DATE:20-511-.P-19 .._-111_4_„ ...___.�. 1.111 f AM COMMUTEP.PERIOD(05:00.04:00) DIR 1 DIP 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-15:00) PIR 1 015 2 TOTAL. TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRE(^ONAt..PEAK AM-'PEAK FIR TIME 07:151750800 AM PAA PEAK HR TIME 0400 IA 05113 PM r. AM PEAK.HO VOLUME 425 1,102 1.537 • PM PEAK lit VOLULO: „+,, 6313 :, AM•012,0100c71'e 1159 PM-K IAC1ORP33., AM-OIl) - 783 717 100 PM ,.1 A D0'�- 4039 dt,. 15133 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK All•PEAKIIR TIME 0(-15 to 09:15 AM 07,00 to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK 11R MME 13130 to 0530 PM 03.37 I.•f.4.y 144 AM 0[136118 VOLUME 45.1 1,102 • PM PEAK HR VOLUME 692 637 ._.,„„.e.._„.._._ I I: AM PERIOD(00:00.12,00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 'EWO OIRECT1ONAL PEAK TWO DIRECIIONAL PEAK AM'PEAK HR TIME 07:00 n:08.00 AM I',M-PEAK tilt TIME 04.00 10 05.0.3 T.49 ' I AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 435 1,107 1,531 PM-PEAK ItR VOWME 667 019 :465 AM-"K FACTOPtAI 8.59 PM-K FAC1ORP651 ;1 •I AM--01%) 293 71.7 100 PM p15R;) 58.36 L 61 103 1. NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00.13.00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-HR 12-HR.24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 Dui 2 TOTAL I TWO DIRECfr It4AL PEAK AM 6.1 IR PE10100(06:00-12_001 2.304 4 I56 -:„n PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 0345 P61 AM 12-118 P117100100:00.-12.00' 0.062 ;553 ..133. PEAK HR VOLUME 757 00) 1.357 PM 6-HR PERIOD.I12:Cdb 11100; ;,0001 3,431 DIRECTIONAL PEAK - PM 17 HR PERIOD 112:0-24;0.11 5,337 4,611 _6c2 • PEAX'IIR TIME 02.-15 Lo 03.45 PM 09:30 to 10:30 AM 24-118 PERIOD(12433.2410) 6,515 11,363 9(93 PEAK HE VOLUME 757 643 D'.3., 17.SS ;247 TIME-AM DIRT DIR7 TOTAL TIME-AM DIRT DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM 01141 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM 0111 DIT+.: TOTAL 1200-12:15 1.3 9 22 00:00 00:15 38 117 155 32110-12.151 ig 124 962 06.00 0614 13,, .. 12'15.17:30 8 10 IS 00:15-06:313 59 157210 1;'15-02-3G G] 33-9 184 On 15 00114.. ;;:"; 150 1230. 12135 IO 5 IS 00'30-00'•15 63 194 277 12.-30"12-40 SS 123 718 06 10 1.61331 ,:, :PA - , 1245 0400 11 0 13 06:45.".31,00 04 210 794 1745 01'111) 105 113 219 V4 :00 11.1 01+1 2'6 collo 151115 9 6 1! 07009-0715 95 228 313 01-00 1)1:15 116 1211 211, 07_0,1 0;11: 53 7 0115 0130 10 5 10t 07:15-D7:30 1017 306 405 01.15 01:13 171 131 272 01.15 I:31., 01 In _.. ' 01-30 01:45 3 4 1 07,3.0-07:45 107 316 423 01130 0045 135 153 280 0-'.11 0711: 35 01:45.•03:00 s 4 9 07:45-08'00 131. 252 303 0145.07'04 139 147 265 • 07 9- 0160 5,01 3,9 110, 02:00-02,15 5 2 7 08;00-03:15 111 201i 019 0200 0215 170 146 316 - 08100 DS15 ,., , 1L, 0215-0230 6 0 37 0031.5-00230 • 65" 1713 ;3.13 02'15 02'30 146 100 796 06 15 6 00 1„ 02:30-02:45 -5 - '1 0.9.30-0845 93 132 225 07:,30"02:45 173 167 340 0' 91 40. .-, ,, 137 02:45-001131 6 7 13 0645-09.03 107 700 287 02,40 03:00 105 159' 333 n 6 1 (17 1-t; 03:00.0315 6 1 7 09:00-09:75 1013. 12) 227 01110 03:15 192 144 336 1)9169 0'11', "_ ,- 110 03:15.0;:30 5 3 9 09:15-09'30 03 132 215 03;15 03:10 197 736 315 00+11 (1,311 ,-. 03:30-03:45 7 5 32 0430-0945 113 141 256 03.30 03,45 203 1.50 353 L 1) 09-15 1411 ,. 112 03?15•04:00 7 13 20 09:45 1000 105 150 271 03315 01.00 212 1010 360 09.5 31:09 `I5 ,,, 04:00-04:15 4 3 13 1010< '1015 125, 141 210 04.00-04.15 710 154 364 10'01 10 15' 1,35 04:15.04:30 9 12 21 10:15 1030 110 107 303 04.15-04.30 154 165 359 10.15 -13 0Z 04:30-04:45 211 27 47 1410 1045 92: 125 2117 71;30 01,45 210 146 304 11,30 t(3-1'; 4, 1,..., 04:45-05,001 24 31- OP 11745 11-00 103 151 254 - 04:45-0400 245 153 399 1045 V(0' • ;,I 0- . 0500-05:15 21 10 51 11 130-11.15 1)3 149 272 OS(K)-00.15 22.2 137 355 11 00 1:1, t ..1 0535-05;30 27 44 77 11:15 1 1311 96 102 _ 190 05.15-05.30 197- 129 326 o33 a 33 , 31 05`30-05:45 43 69 112 11:30 11-45 117 124 241 05 30-05:45 141 127 2601 11'30 I,.4 ... i 7 4r 0445-060100 49 -07 135 11:45 12.04 116 124 247 05 45-0600 162 127 209 11 I1) 11,1.3 .. 15 3 • 'hwypdC07:808Dlords/Pp=101:8:6024500641676`,:N0_RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER;P8_SURVEY_DAY:39867:20 , 112 Appendix B Intersection Operations Analysis - Synchro Worksheets Adjusted Year 2020 Peak Hour Worksheets HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street • 11/13/2020 Intersection : lot Delay, s/veh 3.2 Movement viifiL.,,,,;Vitt:tit/13W: Es1 SBT SBR Lane Configurations 11 44 4* Traffic Vol,vehlh 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30, Future VoL vehlh 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peas,#ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RI Channelized - None- - None - Node Storage Length 150. - - 150 - - - - - - Yen Median # • ; ; „0_ , - 0 - '.9: Grade,% - 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 ,922 92 : 02' - 92 92192 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mirlit HOW' 49., 528 ' 511 -:-.186 92 , ConflictingFlow All 278 0 0 533 0 0 902 929 531 929 885 232 ,:$tage:4;.; , 254 254 Stage 2 - - - - 273 300 - 675 631 CrifiCafHclWy 412 412 712 ;6.52 - 622; :712 6.52', 622 Critical 1-ldwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - efi0t4',H0V0Y5f9:2 612 552 612 552 Follow-up ildwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3,318 3,518 4.018 3.318 • - - - . . - . P.01,C411-1 Mah0.1ivdf 1285 268 548 248 284 807 , Stage 1 - - - 470 475 - 750 697 - ' . Stage 2 - 733 066 444 474 Platoon blocked,% MovCaplManeuver 1285 1035 236 2$5:`;'--548 12 270 807 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 236 255 - 192 270 Stage 1 452 457 722 689 Stage 2 • - - - T. 690 659 -. 353 456 - .rA'Voi',iciailNNFETI!E,ZT'Eij7TT,E1,Z;Tgf;ZOTCTZZRrg,KFENIREE:ET5t;TrTZNTgfflgiCraUiiiiinTWfigfNIPINFJ:Ffii fi..(ato.rticlploi§ 0 7 03 204 123 HCM LOS rif5:07:-SheirNiaiiii7MViiiiV,IgaNblift:17-gaff.:Pti3t5,7.tallt.7.07tfff,:s3WWIZitiktb.PAMIRTRITEIPFLIf,s5F,P,Z7F,7,.7,74:73'iN.:"."f.K7jiffr41 Capacity(Vati#1) 347 1285 1035 533 1-1CM Lane WC Ratio 0.329 0.038 • - 0.011 - - 0.077 1-ICM Control Delay(s) , -;'7 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - B HCM 95th%tile:Q(1'7qt') " • Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 • • • HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 at Delay.slveh 12 Movement EBR -1NBL ,WBT.',V1/13€z N131_ NBT NBR SBL SBT 'SBR Lane Configurations el '44 Traffic Vol,veh/h 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Future Vol,vehlit ' 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peds,#ihr , 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized . Nene - - None - None - None Storage Length 150 • - 150 • - - - - — - Veh in Median Stoiege, .9 - 7 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - 0 • - 0 -- Peak Hoer Factor. 92- 92 92 92 92 - 92 92 92 92 92 92. 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 49 528 5 11 186 92 2233 - 60 3 .5 33 NfgiQMiiiOF.:7„TrMTfmiWiTzi;IR7ZG:a1ifh7iiNfTFST1),li'liaZ:;i,.'M'45*ffitiiTTr Conflicting Flow Al! 278 0 0 533 0 0 902 929 531 929 885 232 Stagel — 629 ,-629 - 25'4 254• . . • - Stage 2 - - - - • 273 300 - 575 631 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 ; 4.12 , , - 7.12 6.52. -6.22 7.12 6.52 G.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - • - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - critical Hdwy S(94 7' 52 612 5 52 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 1518 4.018 3.318 Pot COP-1 Manetnier 1285 ; . 548; 248,-..284 :807 Stage 1 - - — - 470 475 - 750 697 - Stage-2" - -- •-•, • -73.3 .;666 444 474 - Platoon blocked,% Rev Cap-1 MatiettVer, 12852 71035 236 -,255 548 192 " 270 807 - May Cap-2 Maneuver - - — - - 236 255 - 192 270 Stage " •• . 1" ' , I 452 157' ‘` 722 689 • - Stage2 - - 690 659 ,- 353 456 - 1-100 Control Delay i 07 03 20 4 12 3 KIM LOS C 13 Conicity(vehth) 3471. 1285 -;,. - .1035 533 ' HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.329 0.038 - - 0.011 - 0.077 11CM Control Delay(s) 20.4 8.5 12.3- : HCM Lane LOS C A - - B HCIV1-95th C/(velt) - , 0.3: . Existing AM Peak-Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/13/2020 -`'4' -* t` 41-- 4\ f / \ 41 , Movement •' - - EBL EBT . EBR ;,`WBL .MT WBR '', NBL' _- NBT°�' NBR� ` 'SRL ',SBT.' `SBR Lane Configurations ) + P' ) 1, ) '1 1.4 Traffic Volume(vehfh) 16 366 191 115 139 180 144 610 405 145 170 8 Future Volume(veh/h) 16 366 191 115 139 180 144 610 405 145 170 8 Initial Q(Oh),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A„phT) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlh/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 17 398 208 125 151 196 157 663 440 158 185 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 -0.92 , 0.92 0.92 0.92 6.92 0.92 0.92- 0.92 0,92 0,92 0.92 Percent.Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh . 109., 530 449 252 205 266 586 748 634 225" 690 34 Arrive On Green 0.0R 028 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.39 0.30 Sat Flom eehJta' 1781 1370' 1595 1731 • 739" 950 ` 1731, 1870 1535 1781 1703 86 Grp Volume(v),vehlh 17 398 208 125 0 347 157 663 440 158 0 194 Grp Sat Flew(s),veh/h/ln .'1781 1870 1585. '1781. • 0 1698. .1781 1870 1585 1781 , 0 1855 Q Serve(g s),s. 0.8 17.4 9.7 4.5 0.0 16.7 4.7 29.7 20.8` 4.8 0.0 6.4 Cycle 0 Cleat(g_c),s 0.8 ., 17,4 '9,7 4.5 0.Q 16,7• ,' 4.7 29.7 20.8 4.8 • 0.0 6.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 109 530 449 252 "`0 472 5$6; 748 '634. - 2.25 0 723 V/C Ratio(X) 0.16 0.75 016 0.50 0.00 0.74 0.27 0.89 0.69 0.70 0.00 0,27 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 109 530 " 449 252 0 472 ' 586 . 748 634 225 0 `723 MOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstrearni Filter(t) 1,00 ;- 1,00 ` 1.00" 1.00 .`-0:00 1.00`- "1,00 ` 1.00`° 1.00. 1,"60 0;010 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 40,1- 29.4 26.6 23.4 0.0 29.5 14.6 25,1 22.4 21.0 0,0 18.7 (nor belay(d2),slveh, , .- 3.0 -- "9.4 ,3.4; 6,8 0.0, 9,8.. 1,1 14.6' r 0.2.'' 16.8 0.0 6.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ife•BackO(Q(50%),veh/!n 0,4 ' : 8.6 3.9 , 2.2- 0,0 7,.6 =).9. . 14.8 8.1 , . 2,0 - 0.0 ,2,7 Unsig.Movement Delay,sive(' LnGrp Delay(8),slveh 431. 38.8.- • 30.b ' 30,2 0;0 , 39.3 15.7 .39.7 ,-28.6- 37 8, 1 . 0.0 '39.6 LnGrp LOS DDCC A D B D C D A B Approach VOL veh/ll . ,o 0.623 .472 ' 1260. ,. ,352=. Approach Delay,sive)) 36.0 36.9 32.8 27,8 Approach COOS, ' D , .D.. ? C .. C i E er t Assr f 11$K' d v:.w ��`v 1 e1 ."r' w : : a�.., 4%^r^r�n 5 �r x en y' W°' f,.ti,.. }§i,�#if ° { ""x-Yi',� V`�ra t rtf` y^- rr C ,.,E 9n .w: r � 2 .. .3.x....� 4. ,,n. 5 .,.,s':>+.�B.g�� > � .y_ � .�.x,..g� ,.,n" i ,.:,, v �` Pfis Duration_(G4:Y+Rc) s :140 40.5 ' '',9:.„5 'SQ.0 ' 10.0, ` Max Change Green',Setting(VI-Re), s s 4,5 34.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 34 5 14.5 29.E g( x), ,0 25.5 '6,4'•,`• 35.1 5.5 25.0 .. Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 5.8 31,7 6.5 19.4 6.7 8.4 2.8 18.7 Green Ext Time(p c),s 0,0 •2.3 0.0 ' 1.5 '0.0 -1.0 0.0 . 1m Intersection Summary.V.' r d p'.>a ' ,7 "" .'3a h< ,i r7 ..< ,a cK '' 1 , HCM'6fh Ctri Delay' HCfvl6th LOS C Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouti Street 11/13/2020 lntesection Int Delay,siveh 2.6 Movement 'EBT EBRWBL WBT-WIZfBL NBT NBR' SBL .SBT .SBR •..- Lane Configurations ) 44 Traffic Vol,vehih 20 292 5 50 407 5 4 '10 25 2 20 55 Future Vol,vehib 20 292 5 ,50 407 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Conflicting Pads,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop T Channelized None - None — None - '-. None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# • -0 0 0 - - 0 Grade,% • 0 - - 0 - • 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92. 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2- 2 Mvmt Flow „ 22 317 . 5- • 54 442 5 :4 . 11 27 2 22 60' MAVM.'fti.RTRT:S7Mif(iifgiS%?937tTMifdit7D?77,7;3WVifga:tcwxriwrilffggizg-F;mr..luz7:cF:7J Conflicting Flow All 447 0 0 322 0 0 958 919 320 936 919 445 Stage1 • — 364 .364 - 553 653 •-• , Stage 2 - - - - 594 555 - 383 366 - CritiCal Hdwy ' 4,12 -4.12 - :712 - 6.52 6.22 7.12 '6:52 6,22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 612 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy St 2: ' - 6.12 '5,52, 6.12 5..!.i2 FolloW-up Hdwy 2.218 - • 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot'CapA:Manetiver 1113 - 1238 - 237-• ',271 721 245 '271 613 ' Stage 1 - - - - - 655 624 - 517 514 - - --Stage2 ; = 491 513 - 640 623 Platoon blocked,% - 11/16V Capi Maneuver.1113 - ' 1238 - - 191 ,254 721 217 264'• 613 May Cap•2 Maneuver - - - - - 191 254 • 217 254., Siegel " `.; : ," 642-- -612 - 507 -491 , Stage 2T - - - - - 405 490 - 593 611 - „ • - HCM contrel Delay, 0.6 - 0.9 14 , 113 -- HUM LDS El C ariait'W-4TOrarriffiiik5igiglitTnETIFEBV5t157firf-,'.-Ftlf-k-5:Tiilif5rdWilf. ,ATTIPT.STAfinTSI;RPRII7I-721:4P,771•Fig'7,7Z77,71.32-iVi:g7i Capacity'f(vettili) 411 1113 - 1238 -, 433: — • " . HCM Lane ViC Ratio 0.103 0.02 - - 0.044 - - 0.193 FICIVI,Contfol Belay :.; 14.8 8.3. - 8 = - - 15.3 HCM Lane LOS BA - - A - - C TIC1111.95th%tile()(vell), '0.3 0.1 .• - 0.1 - 0.7 . Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place /1113/2020 Intersectiom.. ,,., ., Int Delay,slveh 1.1 Movement EBL . EBT WBT Wf3R- SBL SBR Lane Configurations t + r r Traffic Vol,vehlh 4 315 485 40 48 4 Future Vol,veh/h 4 315 485 40 48 4 Conflicting Peds,4/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 - Veh in Median Storage,4 - 0 0 -0 Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Avtnt Flow` 4 . 342 521 43 52 4 Maor`pjor/Mtny i ' M" atorl`.. . a Maor2. ,Mtnor2" . -,.:;r,m. r} "L^"". .. 't&.WW3W T i 4.,. w .: Conflicting Flow All 570 0 0 877 527 - . Stage 1 _ - 527' Stage 2 - - - - 350 - Critical Ild y 4.12 -. " 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critki C686117104 Stg 2 5,42 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Mtlaneuver 1002 •319 _551 Stage 1 - - - - 592 Rage-2. - • - 713 Platoon blocked, May Cap-1 Maneuver 1002 -. - - 31iJ� 551 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 318 - ,Stage'9. _, 590 Stage 2 - - - - 713 r 4 � � �r rP ,err^ � f �` h �'i "�',''� �"b a r w ""' �' %^ �u AppWnac �, ,v, , EB- r a��,VB, .; ; 'SB.r9 �A r .: ,r_,. �i ..,,��,,,, .`; ., q,.;1 HCM•Control Delay.,s D:1 0' • 16 NCM LOS C Mtiagr l anelMalor;Mvmt ..EBS` ,7.tb .,W 1TWEfi "SBLrtiSdLn2 %r1 1 w ri'` ;''. ,7 ,,. Capacity(vehlh). 1002 -, 318 2551 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.004 - - - 0.164 0.008 HCM Control Delay(s) 8. 18.5 11.6 HCM Lane LOS A • - - C B HCM;95111%tile-1).(veh) • ° 0 0.6 0 ,• Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 NOM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 C 4\ t /1°- \* 'Ir 'WI Movenient -'. : : EBL ': tEit:'' ', EBR: 'WBL - VVBT ' WBR ' NBL. -::NBT NBR SBL'' SBT , 'SBR Lane Configurations ‘1. t rr ) 1* '9 t r Traffic Volume(vehlh) 10 174 179 300 333 110 180 280 175 130 490 12 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 174 179 300 333 110 180 280 175 130 490 12 Initial 0(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Acij(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Atli Sat Flow,vehlhlin 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehth 11 189 195 326 362 120 196 304 190 141 533 13 Peak Hour Factor ' 0,92.. 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,velith 109 530 449 382 373 124 325 748 634 445 709 17 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow,veitih ' ' 1781 1870 1585 1781 1314 .445 1781 1870 1585 1781 1219 41 Grp Volurne(v),veh/h 11 189 195 326 0 482 196 304 190 141 0 546 Grp Sat FlowavehlhAn 1781 1870; 1535- 1781 , .. 0 1790 .1781 1370 1585 1781 9 , 1362 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.5 7.3 9.0 5.0 0.0 24.0 6.0 10.5 7,4 4.2 0.0 22.8 Cycle 0 Clear(g,$),s . : 0.5 7.3 9.0., ' '5.0 0.0 - 24.0 6.0 10.5 ',.7.4 4.2 0.0 22.8 Prop in Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehill : 109 530 '- ‘"449', 382 0 491 325 748 634 445 9 726 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.36. 0.43 0.85 0,00 0.97 0.60 0.41 0.30 0.32 0.00 0.75 Avail Cap(c.,a),vehill 169 530 449 382 . 0, 497 325 748 634 441 0 726 HCM Platoon Ratio 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(i) ' „ . 1.90" '1.0- 1 00 , 1:00 0.00`;, 1.00, 1:00 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.0 1.,99 Uniform Delay(d),sivell 39.9 25.7 26.4 31.0 0.0 32.1 18.4 19.3 18.4 15.3 0.0 23.7 Incr Delail(d2);styeh. : .. 1,9' 1.9' 3.0:' 21,0 0.0 33.4 8.1 -1,6 '21.2 19„ 0.0 7.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile BaCkOf0(50%),vehilp 0.3 23.3'„: 3.6 ', 6.5 0.0 14,2 . 2.9 ': '..4. . 2 '2.7 143: ,00,' 10.4 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGip Delay(0),siveb '41.8 27,6 - 29.4 - 519 0,0 65.5 26.5 21.0 19.6, 17.2 0.0 , 39.7 LnGrp LOS , D CCD A EC C BB A C . , . Approach VpLyellt1i. , 395 . ,' - '808 500 s: , 687 Approach Delay,slveh 28.9 60.1 22,2 28,0 Approach LOS . : - • . C : ''„ . E. . • ' 0 , . '• - c ftF,.:'"'"A-siiAifiaphi':::;;T::TTTT:T;',7;ZIV,-'77Z,T.-:ZZZFZ'iZS:Z7r477'',-7A.17:: T7:'r,i'r6;:7rA7170':;,:':f2:67:',-',TMfn:777'7S,;7',ir:7'775!1 Phs Duration(G•tY4-Rc);s. : 10.0- -40.5 - 9,5 30,0 40.9 .:39.6 10.0 29,- Change Period(Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 5,5 36,0 , 5,0 '215 6.4' 35,1 5.5 25,0 Max 0 Clear Time(g_c411),s 6.2 12.5 7.0 11.0 8.0 24.8 2.5 26.0 Green Ext Time(p.....c),s -- 0.0 2.2 0.0 1.3 ' 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 . rr'if6!R6ieq;'ifT§6'j"-tij-Tali17,77:57,TZTFSC'-Z75Ti2TZTzfi?RY,Fq'iFgT't..5T77- 73T:; :,z7,;jr:CP";;7',7,77-7:,'7F.:Z':T: HCM 6th 6w Delay • 36.6 11CM 6th LOS 0 / Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 ' ........... . Year 2025 Peak Hour Background without Project HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 11/13/2020 Intersection Int Delay, stveit 3.3 Movement , ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBIL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 Traffic Vol,vehlh 45 491 5 10 172 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Future Vol,veh/h 45 491 5 10 172 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 • - 150 - - - - - - - - Veil in Median Storage,# • 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 • Grade,% - 0. - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% • 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvint Flow 49 534 5 -11 187 • 92 22 33 60 3 5 33 77-2 Conflicting Flow All 279 0 0 539 0 0 909 936 537 936 892 233 Stage 1 ,. • - • . - 635 ', 635, .255 255 - Stage 2 - - - - - 274 301 - 681 637 Critical Hdwy 4.12 • - 4,12 - - 7.12 6,52 6,22 7.12 6.52 6.22 ' Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - — - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - CriticaTtldtiq Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5,52 - 6.12 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 1318 3.518 4.018 1318 pot Maneuver 1284 - - 1029 . 256 265 544 245 281 806 Stage 1 - - - - 467 472 - 749 696 - Stage 2 — 732, „665 - 440 , . Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1284 1029 233 252 544 189 267 806 1 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 233 252 - 189 267 - Stage 1 • - - '449 454 .721 686 - Stage 2 - - - - 689 658 - 350 453 - • HCM Control Delay, 0.3 20.6 - • 1.„2„.4- HCM LOS C B „ . Miil'r6irin-4T,M7aTO"rWV.'riii7FFIWi'ilf"YBV:,7,Eftrt:131C,CaLTtitWVB-14S-13rnf7Z,RIT:;i7;403:XEF,T?-':g;T9r:C.:77:'r-'7: Capacity(veh/h) 343 1281 - 1029 - .529 1-ICM Lane V/C Ratio 0.333 0.038 - 0.011 - 0.078 1-ICM Control Delay(s1 20,6 7.9 - 8.5 - - 12.4 HCM Lone LOS CA - A - - B HC11/195th%tile Q(Veti) . 1,4 0.1 - 0 - - 0.3 ' 2025 Background AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 11/1312020 Intersection Int Delay, s%veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t. 1` r i Traffic Vol,veh/h 14 535 257 80 43 10 Future Vol, veh/h 14 535 257 80 43 10 Conflicting Peds,i/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 • Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 582 279 87 47 11 Major/Minor , ,7,7,'Majcmi , .Major2 sMtnor2, .b , i Conflicting Flow All 366 0 - 0 891 279 Stage 1 - - - 279 - Stage 2 - - - - 612 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 -. - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - = 5:42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1193 - - 313 760 Stage:1 - - - - 768 - Stage,;2 Platoon blocked,No Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1193 - • 309 760 May Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 309 - Stage 1 . - - 758 , Stage 2 - - - - 541 - Approach: EB :" WB $B I HCM Control'Delay,s 0.2 0 " 17 HCM LOS C 141inot.)`ert Mal4r Mvmt . =;EBLR I<BT .WBT..WBR SBLn1. BLii2s 7 17 , , .. , m, Capacity;(vehlh) 1193 - - 309 760 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - - 0.151 0.014 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.1 - - 18.7 9.8 HCM Lane LOS A - - - C A HCM 95th°Mile Q(veh) 0' - 0.5 17 2025 Background AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 �- ^ ` ' ' ' . .... _ _ - -- - ' . - _ ^ . HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11113/2020 4 _-0' `0' *--- -4_ ik °� f t L | -/ Movement ~� ' , � ' EBLEBT EBR WBL WBT WBR ' mBL � NBT 'NOR. , 'SBi SBTSBR i000Con8ymalio^ ) 4 r ') I. 'I t r ..f i 1, Traffic Volume(velilh) 17 367 194 115 147 180 172 610 405 145 170 18 FumreVolume("vhlh) 17 367 191 115 147 180 172 610 405 |45 170 18 Initial O(Oh).vah 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Pod'8ikoAdj(kphq 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 0 1.00 1.00 lOO Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone 0 Approach No No No No Adj Sat F|wu.neh/h8n 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1670 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 18 389 211 125 160 196 187 663 440 158 185 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.82 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cop.vohm 109 530 449 251 212 260 581 740 634 225 627 68 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 088 0.28 0.28 0.08 0.40 8.40 0.06 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow,volin 1781 1370 1585 1781 735 937 1781 1870 1535 1781 16I9 179 Grp Va|uso(v),msh/U 13 399 211 125 0 356 187 USS 440 158 0 205 GrpSaLR6n(s)/mhAhiln 1781 1870 1686 1781 0 1702 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1838 QSowe(g_s)'s 0.9 17.5 9.9 4.5 0.0 17.2 5.7 29.7 20.8 4.9 0.0 7.0 , Cycle QC}eudg_c).0 0.9 17.5 9,9 4.5 0.0 17.2 5.7 29.7 20.8 4.9 0.0 7.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 010 1 Lane GrpCup(c),vehIlt 109 530 449 251 0 473 581 748 634 225 0 694 VIC Ratio(X) 0.17 0.75 0.47 0.50 0.00 0.75 0.32 0.89 0.69 0.70 080 0.30 I Avail Ca, _vehth 109 530 449 251 0 473 . 581 748 634 225, 0 691 HOWPlauon Ratio 1,00 1.00 1I0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1I0 1.00 1.00 U/mmomFilter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.o0 1.00 1.00 1l0 1J0 0N 1IN Uniform Delay(d),sit/eh 40.129.426J 23.4 0.0 29.7 14.9 25.1 22.4 21.2 0.0 Delay19.6Incr � s/veh 3.2 9.5 3.5 6.9 0.0 10.6 1.5 14.6 6.2 16.8 0.0 1.1 Initial ' 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 90|e8 0in 0.5, 8.7 3.9 2,2 OD 7.9 2,3 14.8 81 2�. KU 3.0 � Un�g��ovumen D�a�s�eh LnGrpDd /'k0,s/vob 43.3 38.9 30.2 30.3 0.0 40.3 16.4 3S39.728.8 38.0 0.0 20.7 LnGrpL0SDDCC A 0 BD CD A C Approach VOL, Vol 628 � .481 � 1280 ` 363 Approach Delaydveh 36.1 37.7 32.5 28.2 Approach D iJ C C �' � Timer 9hs '' ��_��1 _� 2__�_3r_� ��-__� ,�_�- `' `. ,. 10.0 40.5 9.530.0 `72.0 3U.6- 10.0 29.5 Change 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 (Y � Max Green (Gmux),u 5.5 J�.0 ' 5.0 2s.5^" 73 34.0 65 25.0` MaxQ 1),s 6.9 31.7 6,5 19.5 7.7 9.0 2.9 19.2 Green Ext Time(p_ds 0.0 2.3 0.0 1.5 uO 1.0 0.0 1.o ---- - �- ~�- ,� �7 `--- � � � `- � `- -- --- ��`--- I �� |�.��.` ^ ` �� " � ` � ��, �'~ ^ ' �- , .`'� � � ^� � � - ' HCM 6th did Delay 33.7 . HCM 6th LOS C 1 2025 Background AM Peak HouSynchro 11 Report Page 1 , HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 1/113/2020 Intersection,. . . . , Int Delay,siveh 2.6 Movement ,- EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1+ 4 Traffic Vol,vehJh 20 295 5 50 412 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Future Vol,veh/h 20 295 5 50 412 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Conflicting Peds,it/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - • None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - -• 0 - - 0 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvrnt Flow 22 321 5 54 448 5 4 11 27 2 22 60 Major/Mmol''' 7'Major1, , Majo l c , n Min 01 ;>�--- .-r2��. �;� r .Mrnorz,. Conflicting Flow All 453 0 0 326 0 0 968 929 324 946 929 451 Stage 1 - - • - - - 368 368 559 559 Stage 2 - - - - - 600 561 - 387 370 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 .6.2.2 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical I Idwy Stg 1 - - • - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Sty 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1108 - 1234 - - 233 268 717 241 268 608 Stage1 - - - - - - 652 621 - 513 511 - Stage 2 - .- 488 510 - 637 620 Platoon blocked,% - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1108 - - 1234 - 187 251 717 214 251 608 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - • - - - 187 251 - 214 251 - Stage1 - - - - - 639 609 - 503 489 - Stage 2 - - - - - 402 488 - 590 608 - Xlpproach - EB .�4Vf1, NB =58 . ... NCM Control Delay,s 0.5 0.B 14.9 15.4 HCM LOS 8 C Miner/rine/WarneMvtt. IV(31n1,";'EBL 114,r ESE2 lichiC iff',VIIBR, 8f:h1` ,,,.. , ,"°. ' LL ..,.` Capacity(vehlh) 406 1108 - 1234 - 429 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.104 0.02 - - 0.044 - • 0.195 HCM Control Delay(s) 14.9 8.3 - - 8.1 - 15.4 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A - - C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 .0.1 - - 0.7 2025 Background PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 11/1312020 Int Delay,siveh 2.3 Movement -,-' , , , EBI: EBT WBT WBR SBL £BR:. ... Lane Configurations '19 + + r li r Traffic Vol,vehlh 7 315 485 59 94 9 Future Vol,vehlh 7 315 485 59 94 9 Conflicting Peds,#ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT.Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 • - Vett in Median Storage,#. -- . 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 IVIvmt Flow . 8 .342 : 527, 04 102 . 10 M3T6WtitNOivijiaiairKiaiFia.gz:;!,Oiii4i,nia-Zi7Nirr.FKNF27TTF-P7RifiT,T::R:ET5;Fif9K7-gi-Tz7cq:,i,,,:,Ti. Conflicting Flow AH 591 0 - 0 885 • 527 'Stage 1 ' .; - 527 - ! - _ - ' .', ' : ,f• .-" Stage 2 - - - - 358 - Critical Hdwy . 4.12 , --. , - - 6A2 6,22• Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5,42 - Critical Hriwy Sig 2 , -• , - .5,42.. , r'. • . - • Follow-up Hdwy 2218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ,. 985 . ' -'', „., 315. 551 . • ' , - ' • .; ... ' ' ' - Stage 1 - Stage 2- : ., , 7: ' ': ' '7 :''r 707 , '7 ' • , , ,,- ,' ' , , ''' '., Platoon blocked,% - - - , MoV cap-1 Planeuver ' 985. `-'- ' ,. :- ' .•-,''' 312 551 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 312 - Stage 1 : ' — . , „. -„ ' ;',- - . :5?-7 -- .7- ', .'' ' ,„ '”„ •-' 2'. ' ' ' ' Stage 2 - - 7, - 707 - • ..— ,,, '' , ' . .,. ,. - ''. , . . . , - . --, . — . • 411I,64*.17.:00,7M7,I0713EgIONVITFTRUligil7.740.,Rtifia,::;.S.:1.*W97,.;;"74,317aWlaprzgrgiRTAT),F,77:5f.5;,7,77:71 HCM Control Delay:s 0,2 • 0 ' . : . 2-14 2 . HCM LOS C . . , • . . , . , MiF6RYiiiriffiRTMTifgfR$iftTiIitafiak3fAWB.Rs'ra4g?'rsBiffCfg!rZgg'TErNPRVK75:RIE'TPN:5:F.T.FT,1:7Wi:1 Capacity(velifh) ' ; : 985 . - - . ; 312 '551 , '• ' - ' . - ' ' ' ' HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.008 • - - - 0.327 0.018 HCM Control•belay_N - . :2 i 8.7- .. - . - 22,1 '11.7 HCM Lane LOS A - -., - C B HCM 95th%tile Q(vert) . O.' ',- - - . ,. 1.4. 0.1 . , , , ' . -1, .• , •, ' - 2025 Background PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 NCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/13/2020 J -1 c 4- k 4 t r1" 4 ! 4/ - Movement EBL . , EBT . .EBR . WBL :`'WBTWBR NBL NBT `.-NBR. SBL SBT SBR I ane Configurations , r 'l •j, ) t r I,, Traffic Volume(veh/h) 20 182 207 300 338 110 191 280 175 130 490 15 Future Volume(vehlh) 20 182 207 300 338 110 191 280 175 130 490 15 Initial Q((lb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/1111n 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 22 198 225 326 367 120 208 304 190 141 533 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 109 530 449 428 418 137 302 663 562 420 584 18 Arrive On Green 0.06 0,28 0,28 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow,vehlh 1781 1870 1585 1781 1350 411 1781 1870 1585 1731 1306 54 Grp Volume(v),vehlh 22 198 225 326 0 487 208 304 190 141 0 549 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh/ln • 178,1 1870 1585 1781 0 1791 1781 1870 1585 7781 0 1861 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.1 7,6 10.7 7.9 0.0 2.3.2 6.8 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 25.5 Cycle Q,Clear(gc),s 1.1 7.6 10.7 7.9 0.0 23.2 1 6.8 11.3 . 7.9 4.7 0.0 25.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 109 530 449 428 0 555 302 663 562 420 0 602 V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.37 0.50 0.76 0.00 0.88 0.69 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.91 Avail Cap(c_a),veli/h 109 530 449 428 0 555 302 663 562 420 0 602 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fitter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),sive(' 40.2 25.8 26.9 25.7 0.0 29.4 20.9 22.4 21.3 18.2 0.0 29.2 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 4.1 2.0 4.0 12.1 0.0 17.6 12.1 2.3 - '1.6 , 2.2 0.0 . 20.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 °Toile l3ackOfQ(50%),vehflh 0.6 3.5 " 4.3 3.7 0.0 11.9 3,5 5,0 3.0. 2.0 0.0 13.8 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 4.9.3 27.9 30.9 37.9 0.0 47.0 33.0 24,7 . 22.9 20.4 0.0 49.8 LnGrp LOS DCCD A DCC CC A D Approach VOL vehlh 445 813 702 - 690 Approach Delay,slveh 30.243.3 26.7 43.7 Approach'LOS' C i) 'C 0 Timer-Assigned Phs ' 1 ° '2' ' ` 3 • ' " 4' 5 6` ' . Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 11.2 36.4 12.4 - 30.0 14.0 33.6 10.0 .32.1' Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gniax),s ,617 31.9 ' 7.9 25.5 9.5 29.1 5.5 27.9 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.7 13.3 9.9 12.7 8.8 27.5 3.1 25.2 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.8 Intersection Sumrna _- - - - i ry°. 1 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 36.8I HCM 6th LOS D 2025 Background PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Year 2025 Peak Hour with Project HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street /111312020 Intersection lot Delay,slveli 3.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL 'WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations '+ * 4+ Traffic Vol,veh/h 45 493 5 10 179 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Future Vol, vehlh 45 493 5 10 179 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 49 536 5 11 195 92 22 33 60 3 5 33 Major/M[0r rt. �.Ma1or1 ,. Majot2 .- .Minot1 3.Mina2-'. , a i Conflicting Flow All 287 0 0 541 0 0 919 946 539 946 902 241 Stage 1 - - - - - - 637 .637 - 263 263 - Stage 2 - - - - - 282 309 - 683 639 - Critical Hdwy 4.12. - - 4.12 - -• 7.12 6:52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - • - - 6.12 5,52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - • - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5:52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3,518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1275 - 102.8. - 252 .262 542 241 277 798 Stage 1 - - - - - - 465 471 - 742 691 • Stage 2 - . . 725 860 439 470 Platoon blocked,% - - - - May Cap-1 Maneuver 1275 - 1028 - - 229 249 542- 186 263 798 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 229 249 - 186 263 - Stage l - - - - . . - 447 453 - 714 683 - Stage 2 - - - - 682 653 - 349 452 - A'Pproacti EB wB t`rFN6 SB . HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 0.3 20.9 12.5 HCM LOS C B Mirior,LanelfulaforMvitit °�NBLri1 -EBL. .E67:; EBR ,:11147 r'4NBT WBR•S1313 ,71 , „: ,.-7777:77:77-7777.77-771 Capacity(vett)) 339 1275 - 1028 •- ' - ,522 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.337 0.038 - - 0.011 - 0.079 HCM Control Delay(s) 20.9 7.9 - - 8.5 . - - 12.5 HCM Lane LOS C A - A - - B HCM 95th%the Q(veh) 1A 021 - 0 03 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 11: Mohouli Street & RI/R0 Driveway 1111312020 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 0.1 Movement. EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Line Configurations r r Traffic Vol,vehlh 0 551 267 8 0 7 Future Vol,vehlh 0 551 267 8 0 7 Conflicting Peds,//hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - 150 - - Veh in Median Storage,If - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 599 290 9 0 8 Major/Minorrt. °Major1, • Major2, '.Minor2: ,. 1 Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 - 290 Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - • Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - - 0 749 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 0 Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 749 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - - - - Approach - EB" SB - HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 9.9 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvint HBT ANBT_.°WBR S8Ln1 • . . ,`. '22 G Capacity(vehlh) 749 1-ICM Lane WC Ratio - • - 0.01 HCM Control Delay(s) - - 9.9 HCM Lane LOS - - A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - 0 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 11113/2020 Intersection" Int Delay, slveh 1.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 9 + t r ' r Traffic Vol,vehih 16 535 265 80 74 10 Future Vol,vehih 16 535 265 80 74 10 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 • 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 17 582 288 87 80 11 lajoriMmor ° e' -106ri, 3Ma1or2, `MmSi2`.. , "l Conflicting Flow All 375 0 - 0 904 288 Stage 1 - - - - 288 - Stage 2 - - - - 616 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 6,42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy 5tg 2 - - - = 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 • - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1183 - - - 307 751 Stage 1 - - - - 761 - Stage 2 - -. - . 539 Platoon blocked,% - - - May Cap-1 Maneuver 1183 - - - 303 751 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 303 - Stage 1 - - 750 Stage 2 - - - - 539 - ipproach EBS, R .,jB. S HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 19.8 HCM LOS C Min3or Lariail~1aI©r,MUn .. , ' :;EBL, ;; gT .Wf31 .WBFt:SBLn1"S Ln2 '.` ," " " Capacity(vehih) 1183 - - 303 751 FICM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 - - - 0.265 0.014 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.1 - - - 21.1 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A - - - C A 1-1CM 95th%tile Q(veh) ,0 - . 1 0 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 • HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/13/2020 C "4- k- 4\ t P \s' 1, 41 , . _... Movement' .' - EBL 'EBT ' EBR '' Wel'', WBT. '1111BR NIL NBT, MBR SBL'. SBT ,-SBR I Lane Configurations ) + r t) T.+ ) + Traffic Volume(vehlh) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 . 175 130 490 23 Future Volume(vehlh) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlh/In 1870 1810 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 '1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 24 203 241 326 380 120 229 304 190 141 533 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0:92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ' Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 422 422 133 296 663 562 420 573 27 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow,vehlit .1731 1870 1585 1701 1363 430. 1781 1870 1585 1781 1772 83 Grp Volume(v),vehill 24 203 241 326 0 500 229 304 190' 141 0 558 Grp SatFlow(s),vehltilln 1781 1870 1585 1781 . . • .0 1793 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1855 0 Serve(g_s),s 1.2 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24.0 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.2 7.9 11:6 7.9 0.0 '24.0 . 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehlh 109 530 449 422 0 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.38 0.54 0,77 0.00 0.90 0.77 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.93 Avail CaP(c_a),vehlh -109 530 449 422 -' 0 556 '296 663 562 420. 0 600 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filler(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 40.2 25.9 27.3 25.9 0.0 29.7 21.3 22.4 21.3 18.2 0.0 29.5 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 4,6 2.1 4.5 12.9 - 0.0. 20.1 17.8 2.3 .1.6 2.2 0.0 23.0 initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile'llack01Q(570%),veh/In •0:6 3.6 4.6 ,' 3.8° ":0.0 12.6 - .4.2 .5.0 3.0 .2.0' 0.0 14.5 Unsig.Movement Delay,slveh LnGrp Delay(d)1s/veh 44.8 28.0 31.8 38.8 0.0. 49.8 39.1 24.7 22.9 20.4 0.0 52.5 LnGrp LOS D C C D A 0 D C C C A D . . Approach Vol,vehlh, - 468 ,826 ' 723 699 . Approach Delay,slveh 30.8 45.5 28.8 46.0 Approach LOS D 1 Phs DuratiOn(G-1-Y.FRc),s 11.2 36.9 . 12.4 30.0 14.0 . 33.6 10.0 ' 32.4 Change Period(Y-4-Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 1 Max Green Setting(Gran ),s 6.7 31.9 7.9 ' 25.5, 9.5 29.1 .5:5 27.9 Max 0 Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.7 13.3 9.9 13.6 9.5 28.2 3.2 26.0 Green Ext Time(p_c),S 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.6 Intersection Suifirnary>'- '..7.--: ..' .. :,7-,;..- :- ,,, -- ,. . ,.. 7-...„ :, -:-- -,::' - : ,,, ,, ..„- ':-, , : - . . • l , NCM 6th art Delay . . 38.6 - - HCM 6th LOS . 0 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 _ 1 HCM 6th TWSC • 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 1111312020 Intersection xs Int Delay, s/veh 2.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) j, t.* 44 Traffic Vol,vehlh 20 299 5 50 414 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Future Vol,vehlh 20 299 5 50 414 5 4 - 10 25 2 20 55 Conflicting Peds,it/hr 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free. Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,i1 - 0 - 0 - - 0 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 325 5 54 450 5 4 11 27 2 22 . 60 Mif..�T r x^s �� - � s b s�� ^'u rv�;,r^ d """° --.r`%,VA tix�- ,""`F d t� or/Mmnr.,,: , .'M4iFt ,... -slMajar . .n tt ihotl , . -, Mmor2',. .. Conflicting Flow All 455 0 0 330 0 0 974 935 328 952 935 453 Stage 1 - - - - - 372 372 -- 561 561 Stage 2 - - - - - - 602 563 - 391 374 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - -, 4.12 - - 7.12. 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 , Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - • - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - -6.12 5,52 = `6.12 5:52 - - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1106 - 1229 - 231 265 713 239 265 607 Stage 1 - - - - - 648 619512 510 - Stage 2 - 486 6.09 633 618, Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1106 - - 1229 - 185 246 713 212 248 607 • Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 185 248 - 212 248 - Stage 1 - - 635 '607 502 488 Stage 2 - - - - - - - 400 487 - 586 606 - rp-Feacfi EB:`:.. WB .- ; .NB ; SB' HCM Control Delay,s 0.5 ' 0.9 15 15,5 NCM LOS C C Minor LaitelMaforMvmt NBLn1= 'EBL .EBT., EBR WBL' NtBT `VilBf2 SBLt`1n... _ : . vn ` ... ., ., .. .'r Capacity(vehfh) 402 1106 - 1229 • 426 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.105 0.02 - - 0.044 - - 0.196 HCM Control Delay(s) 1.5 8.3 - 8.1 - - 15.5- HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - C HCM 95th Vile Q('leh) ` 0.4 0.1 - 0.1 : - - . 0.7' 2025 Total PM Peak Hour ' Synchro 11 Report Page 1 - - ' ~ ' - HCM 6th TWSC 1 1: M0h0u|i Street & RI/RC) Driveway 11/l3120Z0 h8om*ch&h':• �• I-.i'• •'+^�`` ^ •'` ~- - `��^ '/��- �'''� int Belay,sboh V Movement EBL EBT WBT VVGR SBL SBR , • Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 326 462 40 0 2 Future Vol,vea Q 326 462 40 0 2 Conflicting Pods,#/hr 0 0 0 O 0 0 Sign Control Free Fns Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Norte Storage Length ' - 158 - Veh in Median Storage,# - O 0 - 0 - Grade,Y6 ' U 0 - 0 ' Peak Hour Facto82 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 354 602 43 0 2 Conflicting Flow All ' O - 0 - SO2 Stage 1 ' -- � - ' Stage 2 - ' Critical Hdmy . , - ' - ' 6.22 Critical HdwvSgl Critical Hdwy Sty 2 - - F - - - ' - 1318 Pot Cap-1 ManeuverO - -- Q 569 ` Stage 0 - ' - 0 ' Stage Q _ ^ -- - 0 - ' � Platoon blocked,% - - .1‘,4oyCap4Maneuver - • ' - ' 5§9 � Mov Maneuver - - . - Stage 1 _ Stage 2 ' ' ' ' - - , ' . ` , HCM Control Dela ,s 0 fl '11.4 HCM LOS HCM Control Delay(s) - ' ' "11.4 11CM Lan LOS - 8 HUISGN%0bQkeh - - ' 0 � 2025 Total PM Peak Hour Syncm11Report 1 Page • HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 11113/2020 Intersection Int Delay,siveh 3.2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations + r Traffic Vol,vehfh 11 315 525 59 116 11 Future Vol,veh/h 11 315 525 59 116 11 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop , RT Channelized - None - None • None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvm€Flow 12 342 571 64 126 12 Major/Minor Major1.;. Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 635 0 - 0 937 571 Stage 1 - - - 571 - Stage 2 - - - - 366 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 6A2 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 948 - 294 520 Stage 1 - - - - 565 - Stage 2 - - - - 702 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 948 • - - 290 520 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 290 - Stage 1 - - - - 558 Stage 2 - • - - 702 - Approach EB . WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.3 0 25.3 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL SEDT WBT 11VBTI WBR,SBLn1SBLn2• Capacity(vehfh) 948 - - - 290 520 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - - 0.435 0.023 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.8 - - - 26.6 12.1 HCM Lane LOS A - - - 0 B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 2.1 0.1 2025 Total PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/13)2020 - c 4\ t /* 1 4/ Movement .EBL EBT EBR' : WBL' - WBT" WBR` NSL NBT NBR SBL SBT .SBR I"ane Configurations i ' 15 1 1 t ? 'I 1 Traffic Volume(veh/h) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 Future Volume(veh/h) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 175 130 190 23 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pod-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlhlln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 24 203 241 326 380 120 229 304 190 141 533 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92• 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veil,% 2 2 2 2 .2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 422 • 422 133 296 663 562 420 573 27 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.09 .0.31 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.07 0,32 0.32 Sat Flow,voiiTh 1781 1870 1.55 1781 1353 430 1781 1370 1535 1731 1772 33 Grp Voluma(v),vchitr 24 203 241 326 0 500 229 304 190 141 0 558 Grp SatF1pw(s),vehlhttn 1781 . 1870 1585 1781 0 1793 1781• 1870 1585 1781. 0 1855 0 Serve(g_s),s 1,2 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24.0 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Cycle Q Ciear(g_c),s 1.2 " 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24.0' 7.5 11.3. 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 109 530 449 422 0 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.38 0.54 0.77 0.00 0.90 0.77 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.93 Avail Cap(c,,a),vehlh 109 530 449 422 0 556 296 663 562 420. 0 600 1 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),siveh 40.2 25.9 27.3 25.9 0.0 29.7 21.3 22.4 21.3 18.2 0.0 29.5 Inc)Delay 021 slveh 4.6 2.1 4.5 12.9 . .'0.0 20.1 17.8 2.3 1.6 2.2 0.0 23.0 Initial C Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °/Wile BackO1Q(50°%O),vehil 0.6 3.6 4.6 3.8 , ; 0.0 12.6 4:2 5.0 - 3.0 ' 2.0 0.0 14.5 Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),siveh 44.8 28.0 31.8 38.8 0.0 49.8 39.1 24.7 22.9 20.4 0.0 52.5 LnGrp LOS DCCD A DDCCC A D Approach Vol,vehth 458 826 723 699 Approach Delay,shveh 30.8 45.5 28.8 46.0 Approach LOS C D C D ;timer AssiymdP:hs 1. 2 :. 3, T.. .C. -76- 7-- -:, -'"-T -C7-7-7 :Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 11.2 36.4 12.4 30.0 14.0 33.6 10.0 32.4 Change Period(V+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 - 4.5 Max Green:Setting(Gmax),s 6.7 31.9 , 7.9 25.5 0.5 29.1 . 5;5 27.9 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.7 13.3 9.9 13.6 9.5 28.2 3.2 26.0 Green Ext Time(p.,c),s ' 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.6 l tersection`StCmn r ry ',. '`7 . ,. _F HCM 6th )r!belay 38.6 HCM 6th LOS D 2025 Total PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Appendix C Intersection Level of Service Definitions Highway Capacity Manual 2010 Signalized intersection level of service (LOS) is defined in terms cif a weighted average control delay for the entire intersection. Control delay quantifies the increase in travel time that a vehicle experie` es due to the traffic signal control as well as provides a surrogate measure for driver discomfort and fuel consumption Signalized intersection LUS is staled in terms of average control delay per vehicle lin seconds) during a specified lime period (e.g.. weekday PM peak hour). Control delay is a complex measure based on i-nary variables, including signal phasing and coordination (i.e.. progression of movements through the intersection and along the corridor), signal cycle length. and traffic volumes with respect to intersection capacity and resulting queues. Table 1 summarizes the LOS criteria for signalized intersections. as described in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010(Transportation Research Board. 2010). Table 1. Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Average Control Delay Level of Service (secondsivehicle) General Description <,0-- — Cron Flow ..,....... -.�,e�..�,...�...�.,-,..,.�.,..�.• B >10-20 Stable Flow(slight delays) — C >20-35 Stable flow(acceptable delays) �— — >35-55 Approaching unstable flow(tolerable delay,occasionally wait tnrough more than one signal cycle before proceeding) E >55-80 Unstable flow(intolerable delay) F' >80 Forced flow(congested and queues fail to clear) Source:Highway Capacity Manual 2010.Transportation Research Board,2010. I If the volurre•to-caprtcity(v/c)ratio for a lane group exceeds 1.0 LOS Fins assigned to the individual lane group.LOS for overall approach or intersection us determined solely by the control delay. Unsignalized intersection LOS criteria can be further reduced into three intersection types: all-way stop, two-way stop, and roundabout control. All-way stop and roundabout control intersection LOS is expressed in terms of the weighted average control delay of the overall intersection or by approach.Two-way stop- controlled intersection LOS is defined in terms of the average control delay for each minor-street movement (or shared movement) as well as major-street left-turns. This approach is because major-street through vehicles are assumed to experience zero delay, a weighted average of all movements results in very low overall average delay, and this calculated low delay could mask deficiencies of minor movements. Table 2 shows LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections. Table 2. Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay(seconds/vehicle) A 0-10 B >10-15 D >25-35 E >35-50 F' >50 Source:Highway Capacity Manual 2010,fransportatirsn Research Board,2010. 1 i}the volume-to-capacity led ratio eu+ceeds f.0,LOS F is assigned an individual lane group tar all unsignaliznd intersections,or minor street approach at two-way step-conlralied intersections.Overall intersection LOS us determined solely by control delay DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY OF HAWAII HILO, HAWAII DATE: December 29, 2020 TO: Zendo Kern, Planning Director FROM: Department of Public Works, Engineering Divisi) SUBJECT: STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT (SLU 20-000054) Request: Agricultural to Urban Applicant: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) TMK: 2-4-001:168 We have reviewed the subject request forwarded by your memo dated December 1, 2020 and provide the following: The subject parcel is in an area designated as Zone X on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Zone X is an area determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on site and not directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared and the recommended drainage system shall be constructed meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works. All earthwork activity, including grading and grubbing, shall conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentation Control, of the Hawaii County Code. Construction within the County right-of-way (ROW) shall comply with HCC, Chapter 22, County Streets. Connection to Kupuna Place and Mohouli Street will require ROW permits. Install streetlights and traffic control devices as may be required by the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works. The applicant shall be responsible for the design, purchase, and installation of such devices. Questions may be referred to Robyn Matsumoto at 961-8924. Planning Dep . Exhibif. 5_____9.. 38942 • • DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY COUNTY OF HAWAII 345 KEKUANAO'ASTREET, SUITE 20 • HILO, HAWAI'I 96720 aiiiltA T; TELEPHONE(808)961-8050 FAX (808)961-8657 AetatDecember 30, 2020 TO: Mr. Zendo Kern, Director ;:; y Planning Department FROM: Keith K. Okamoto, Manager-Chief Engineer • SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment Request: Agricultural to Urban Applicant: Ilawai`i Island Community Development Corporation (IIICDC) Tax Map key 2-4-001:168 We have reviewed the subject application and have the following comments. Please be informed that there is an existing 12-inch waterline along Mohouli Street fronting the subject parcel or an existing 12-inch waterline along Kupuna Place. Based on the consumption history of the Mohouli Senior I lousing project, water can be made available in accordance with the Department's existing water availability conditions, which are subject to change without notice. Prior to issuing a water commitment for the proposed project, the Department will request estimated maximum daily water usage calculations, prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of I lawai`i, For review and approval. After review of the calculations,the Department wil! deterinine a water commitment deposit amount, prevailing facilities charge (subject to change) to be paid, and any water system improvements required for final approval. Construction plans showing the proposed water system improvements must also be submitted for review and approval. • Please be informed that the existing 1 2-inch waterlines within both roadways are adequate to provide 2,000 gallons per minute for fire protection, as required per the Department's Water System Standards. Any meter(s) serving the proposed project will require the installation of a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly within five (5) feet of the meter on private property. The Department must inspect and approve the installation prior to commencement of water service. Planning Dept. Exhibit 6 _. . . . Water, Our Most Precious P source . . . 7.a Wai., pane , . . ' . �3 9 0 3 5 The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer. /..cndo Kern. I)irectk,r Dember 30. 20:0 should kcrc he :11)% quesi.ion.!--,. please contact NIT. 16 an Quik.Nridno olour Remmri...es ani 4-.;07(). e.•;lension 250. Sincerely wurs. Keith K. Okamoto. PI. Manager-Chief Ent2,incer RO:dlo copy — Mr. Keith Kato, Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation • Mitchell D.Roth '• „� - i, Ramzi 1.Mansour Mayor _��+ Director Lee E.Lord Managing Director •• County of Hawaii DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT o 345 Kekuanao`a Street, Suite 41 • Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Ph:(808) 961-8083 • Fax: (808)961-8086 Email: cohdem@hawaiicounty.gov MEMORANDUM TO: Zendo Kern, Director Planning Department FROM: Ramzi I. Mansour, Director l' Environmental Management Department DATE: December 16, 2020 SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20-000054) Request: Agricultural to Urban Applicant: Hawai'i Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Tax Map Key: (3) 2-4-001-0168 The Solid Waste Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments and/or recommendations (contact the Solid Waste Division for details): ® No comments. ( I Commercial operations,State and Federal agencies, religious entities and non-profit organization may not use transfer stations for disposal. Aggregates and any other construction/demolition waste should be responsibly reused to its fullest extent. Ample and equal room should be provided for rubbish and recycling. Green waste may be transported to the green waste sites located at the West Hawai'i Organics Facility and East Hawai'i Organics Facility, or other suitable diversion programs. Construction and demolition waste is prohibited at all County Transfer Stations. Submit SolidWaste Management Plan in accordance with attached guidelines. Existing Solid Waste Management Plan is to be followed. Provide update to the department on current status. I I Other: F.a ling . e .. i. Exhibit 7 County of Flaaai'i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. 1 8 7 8 9 The Wastewater Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments and/or recommendations (contact the Wastewater Division for details): I1 No comments. j Require connection of existing and/or proposed structures to the public sewer in accordance with Section 21-5 of the Hawai'i County Code. P) Require Council Resolution to approve sewer extension in accordance with Section 2I- 26.1 of the Hawaii County Code. Complete Sewer ExtensionApplication. Require extension of the sewer system to service the proposed subdivision in accordance with Section 23-85 of the Hawaii County Code. X Check or line out as applicable: � � If required by the Director of the Department of Environmental Management ("Director of DEM"), applicant shall conduct a sewer study in accordance with the then applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the County sewer system. Applicant shall provide such sewer line or other facility improvements as the Director of DEM may reasonably require, which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation of impacts of the proposed project. Contact Wastewater Division Chief for details. I_i Other: • RM scs • 1 •Couniy of Ha3sai`i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Enipiloyir. • )1„ ttt Mitchell D. Roth -4,0.-,c„.� 7,7, 1, Robert R.K. Perreira Mayor % Acting Fire Chief '.' Lee E. Lord 111. Managing Director County of TOatuari HAWAII FIRE DEPARTMENT 25,lupuni Street•Suite 2501• Ililo.I1ae'ai'i 96720 (808)932-2900•Fax(808)932-2928 December 16, 2020 TO: ZENDO KERN, PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: ROBERT R. K. PERREIRA,ACTING FIRE CHIEF SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 20-000054) Applicant: Ifawai'i Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Request: Agriculture to urban Tax Map Key: (3)2-4-001:168 In regards to the above-mentioned request, the following shall be in accordance: NFPA 1, UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 2006 EDITION Note: llawai'i State Fire Code, National lire Protection Association 2006 version. with County of Ilan oi'1 amendments. County amendments are identified tivith a preceding "C—" of.the reference code. Chapter 18 Fire Department Access and Water Supply 18.1 General. Fire department access and water supplies shall comply with this chapter. For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature, or where special hazards exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy, or where access for fire apparatus is unduly difficult, or areas where there is an inadequate fire flow, or inadequate fire hydrant spacing, and the AHJ may require additional safeguards including, but not limited to, additional fire appliance units, more than one type of appliance, or special systems suitable for the protection of the hazard involved. 18.1.1 Plans. . 18.1.1.1 Fire Apparatus Access. Plans for fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the lire department for review and approval prior to construction. -r d d 7 Pionning Dew. f A ' Exhibit- 8 RE i Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. 1 al 8 5 7 2 rHV ally A.q pa rpolu ag d) pal. [truod ac[ [Iet[s 1.6• •z•g I i{;ino_tgi ['E.-681 JO sluauJ Jrnira.r ar[1 ` Lras3.rd ale SSa[ Jo ( lu LE) 0,{0017 saltl)3ns's Jo siiulpinlg poti'aelap purr •svuTp[tnq It;.ullin3r'.I ie •spat{S •suod.io7J `so e.e',,i a10Ar.Td.10 srul[[a.1p Xinue.I-OA1.) purr -auo Om1 uerR zoom iou uat[m -aE" I i'_•"L $l :f oa.lorp uoiieutguroo o.f0 'SJuc[ 5101 'S3u0[3.1.1[ •SA12Atpo.O.1 {:O 1S1S1103 'lugs Speo.I SS23311 111M11LJ8d3a 3Jld z.•l,`c7.gii 'paleoo[a.l.10 palanhlsuoa Ja1J1:a1all &u1.p[tng e.[,O uof.tod.10 utpltng •,(11}l 1J Asa.Aa Jof pap[,to.td aq I[eiis spear ssa3ae luauu.redap aril patoidcly 1'I' •ssaJaV pa.rrrllJ.aJ l"cV I (uvaj. se pat.tajai aq Aeru*) •speoj ssaaay Iualu1.Iudaa a.rl:,tl .•i.-g "SS30313 l.uauTIJedap 3.111 luana.Id p[no3 1841_murmur e ut paytpotu S! 553338 341 1134M f[-[ 1 341 C1.11Ou[legs `z•z•z•gi JO p2Jr ads se ssaoon ivauti_redap any po.n ba.r gum, `oare.io waron.al.s e Jo wednoao.ro laun ° al{•� •aauelt:31uroj SSa33V ,'Z.Z.SI .1.113ISAS JO.33!Aap p3AOJddt; 08,10 asn aq1, I4 11o:1t{) S10.3.LICIO 3Aap.10 suotsTATpgns pale? 01 pap!Ao.Td aq ss333e 1uau11.Iedop any: a.rinba':r o1 ,t1l.roylne ai[l 0AUi[ [legs IRV atu•s;uarudoloA3U Jo suoistAlpgns pa1e4}oI ssaaay z-z.z.si • 'i li.rllaas.{o asneoaq )!n31Urp Sl 83.18 JO 3.[11)361.5 L' 011111A110 01 550338 2J31-I,11 UO11e301 algtSS333e UR u1 1)3[Ie1s1.11 3q of (Sa)xog ssa33e Ul? a.unbar of AlT.logine all) 2A13CI IIe1IS fi-[d' al{I•(SJ)XOa SSaaay l.'C..L.HI •se3.1V.10 Sa.niyanJ)c;01 ssaaa\? Z•Z•sl -6. [ tr 113,3-,6 aourrp.r000e ut [131981,ur8ww p1W papinoJcl ac{ ![ergs ssaooe 1uotu)Jedap a.lo purr ssaaae luourl_.edap and [-z•81 •ssaaaV luauq.rudaq 0.11,4 Z•81 •IauUOS.Tad nl:a.lna uo!luOnald 3.11.1 ,{q passaulr,» s]u1:Jpn11 JO aaue1d233e pre OUIL1Sll[I 3111 purr 'a3tItUalUteU1 J0/purr • ulls31 ule.rp,Cl{ 'Suorle.lado gulltlulio.11l fiull7npuOa [auu0s.rad l lour ed3a ?.11.[ :uo!lda3x l •1-1.131S.AS J0 •c1ddns .I018A1 18.11) S11_Tan05.10 SUA\01ct11 rctL'dtuoo.10 •luottl).eclap our Jo 0Aneluas2.1claJ J0.8311.110 0111 11iW11 11111.134 t>Jo uolsSIIIAJ d sa.113as 1s.n.I uos.iod gins ssalun lultip:iy aria ,iur al+eJ3d�� .10 osn glens tIO Jali I13%Lrntilneun °N •suoi)al.1.)saN pure asn Uu°Jp,'[I a•/!.[ I•Z'I•1•8I ~J '110113r1J)S110.-) or Jol.td IelO.Illdtl pull :11x11?.1 .IOI IlM111.18d3p 3.111 3111 01 pailllugns ,c1 I!e1I` n113.1p4.11 .ul .101 Su0llratllads purr sur,id •suralS,ts lint l J_4I 0.I!I z-[•[•8 8.10 Z "t'<I (JZOZ. .9! .tai{ulaa3Q .10)331 K'] d "11.13N 0pu37 Zendo Kern. Planning. Director December O. 2020 Page 3 o18 18.2.3.1.4 When lire department access roads cannot he installed due to location on property„ topowraphv, waterways. nonnegotiable grades. or other similar conditions. the Al-li shall be authorized to require additional lire protection features. 18.2.3.2 Access to Building. 18.2.3.2.1 A tire department access road shall extend to within in 50 It (15 in) of at least one exterior door that can be opened from the outside that provides access to the interior of the building. Exception: 1 and 2 single-family dwellings. 18.2.3.2.1.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13, 'NFPA i 3D. or NFPA 13R, the distance in 18.2.3.2.1 shall be permitted to be increased to 300 feet. 2provided such that any portion of the facility or .18.2.3..:.._ Fire department access roads shall be ) 1 any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located not more than 150 ft (46 m) from fire department access roads 'as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. 18.2.3.2.2.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13,NFPA 13D, or NFPA 13R, the distance in 18.2.3.2.2 shall be permitted to be increased to 450 ft (137 m). 118.2.3.3 Multiple Access Roads. More than one fire department access road shall be provided when it is determined by the AI-IJ that access by a single road could be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, or otherfactors that could limit access. 18.2.3.4 Specifications. 18.2,3.4.1 Dimensions. C— 18.2.3.4.1.1 FDAR shall have an unobstructed width of:not less than 20f1 with an approved turn around area if the FDAR exceeds 150 fret. Exception: FDAR Ibr one and two family dWellings shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 15 feet, with an area of not less than 20 feet wide within 150 feet of the structure being protected. An approved turn around area shall be provided lithe FDAR exceeds 251 feet. C— 18,2.3.1.1.2 F.DAR shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less then 13ft 6 in. C— 18.2.3.4.1.2.1 Vertical clearances may he increased or reduced by the AI-1.1, provided such increase or reduction does not impair access by the lire apparatus, and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating such approved changes. C--18.2.3.4.1.2.2 Vertical clearances shall be increased when vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to accommodate fire apparatus. Zendo Kern, Planning Director December 16. 2020 Page 4 of 8 • C- 15.2.3.4.2 Surface. Fire department access loads and budges shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads (25"Tons) of the lire apparatus. Such FDA R :til shall be comprised oral) all-weather driving surface. 18._7 .3.4.3 Turning Radius. C- 18.2.3.4.3.1 Fire department access roads shall have a minimum inside turning radius of 30 .feet, and a minimum outside turning radius of 60 feet. 18.2.3A.3.2 Turns in lire department access road shall maintain the minimum road width. 18.2.3.4.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 It(46 in) in length shall he provided with approved provisions for the fire apparatus to turn around. 18.2.3.4.5 Bridges. 18.2.3.4.5.1 When a bridge is required to be used as part of a lire department access road, it shall • he constructed and maintained in accordance with county requirements. 18.2.3.4.5.2 The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to cavy the imposed loads of fire apparatus. 18.2.3.4.5.3 Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges where required by the AH.I. 18.2.3.4.6 Grade. C- 18.2.3.4.6.1The maximum gradient of a Fire department access road shall not exceed 12 percent for unpaved surfaces and 15 percent for paved surfaces. In areas of the FDAR where a Fire apparatus would connect to a Fire hydrant or Fire Department Connection, the maximum gradient of such area(s)shall not exceed 10 percent. 18.2.3.4.6.2* The angle of approach and departure for any means of fire department access road shall not exceed 1 ft drop in 20 ft(0.3 m drop in 6 m) or the design limitations of the fire apparatus of the fire department, and shall be subject to approval by the AI-1J. 18.2.3.4.6.3 Fire department access roads connecting to roadways shall be provided with curb cuts extending at least 2 ft(0.61 in) beyond each edge of the fire lane. 18.2.3.4.7 Traffic Calming Devices.The design and use of traffic calming devices shall be approved the AHJ. 18.2.3.5 Marking of Fire Apparatus Access Road. • Zendo Kern. Planning Director- December 16. 2020 Page 5 of 8 18.2.3.5.1 Where required by the AI-1.1, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained to identify tire department access roads or to prohibit the obstruction thereof of both. 18.2.3.5.2 A marked tire apparatuS access road shall also be known as a lire lane. 18.2.4* Obstruction and Control of Fire Department Access Road. 18.2.4.1 General. 18.2.4.1.1 The required width of a fire department access road shall not be obstructed in any manner. including_'by the parking of vehicles. 18.2.4.1.2 Minimum required widths and clearances established under 18.2.3.4 shall be maintained at all times. 18.2.4.1.3* Facilities and structures shall be maintained in a manner that does not impair or impede accessibility for lire department operations. 18.2.4.1.4 Entrances to fire departments access roads that have been closed with gales and barriers in accordance with 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be obstructed by parked vehicles. 18.2.4.2 Closure of Accessways. 18.2.4.2.1 The AI-I.I shall be authorized to require the installation and maintenance of gates or other approved barricades across roads, trails, or other accessways not including public streets, alleys, or highways. 18.2.4.2.2 Where required, gates and barricades shall be secured in an approved manner, 18.2.4.2,3 Roads, trails, and other access ways that have been closed and obstructed in the manner prescribed by 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be trespassed upon or used unless authorized by the owner and the Al-1J. 18.2.4.2.4 Public officers acting within their scope of duty shall be permitted to access restricted property identified in 18.2.4.2.1. 18.2.4.2,5 Locks, gates, doors, barricades. chains, enclosures, signs, tags. or seals that have been installed by the fire department or by its order or under its control shall not be removed, unlocked, destroyed,tampered with, or otherwise vandalized in any manner. 18.3 Water Supplies and Fire Hydrants 18.3.1* A water supply approved by the county, capable of supplying the required ffre flow for fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities or buildings, or portions thereof,are hereafter cOnstructed,ormoved into or within the:.county: When any portior>.ofthe • Zendo Kern. Planning Director December 16. 2020 Page 6 of facility or building is in excess 415(1 fk.:et (45 720 nun) from a water supply on a fire apparatus access marl, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building. on- site lire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided when required by the All.), For on-site tire hydrant requirements see section I 8.3.3. EXCEPTIONS: 1. When facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system the provisions of section 18.3.1 may be modified by the AHJ. 2. When water supply requirements cannot be installed due to topography or other conditions, the A1-1.1 may require additional fire protection as specified in section 18.3.2 as amended in the code. 3. When there are not more than two dwellings, or two private garage, carports, sheds and agricultural. Occupancies, the requirements of section. 18.3.1 may he modified by AM. 18.3.2* Where no adequate or reliable water distribution system exists, approved reservoirs, pressure tanks, elevated tanks, fire department tanker shuttles, or other approved systems capable of providing the required lire flow shall be permitted. 18.3.3*The location, number and type of tire hydrants connected to a water supply capable of delivering the required fire flow shall be provided on a fire apparatus access road on the site of the premises or both, in accordance with the appropriate county water requirements. 18.14 Fire Hydrants and connections to other approved water supplies shall be accessible to the fire department. 18.3.5 Private water supply systems shall be tested and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25 or county requirements as determined by the AHJ, 18.3.6 Where required by the AHJ, fire hydrants subject to vehicular damage shall be protected unless located within a public right o r way. 18.3.7 The Al-fl shall be nod lied whenever any fire hydrant is placed out of service or returned to service. Owners of private property required to have hydrants shall maintain hydrant records of approval, testing, and maintenance, in accordance with the respective county water requirements. Records shall be made available for review by the A1-IJ upon request. C— 18.3.8 Minimum water supply for buildings that de not meet the minimum County water standards: Buildings up to 2000 square feet,shall have a minimum of 3.000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings 2001-3000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 6,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Zendo Kern, Planning Director December 16. 202( Page 7 of.t Buildings, 300i- 6004.) square feet. shall have a minimum of 1.2.001) callous ol'waler available for Firefighting`,. Buildings. greater than 6000 square feet, shall meet the minimum County water and fire flow requirements. • Multiple story buildings shall multiply the square feet by the amount of stories when determining the minimum water supply. Commercial buildings requiring a minimum lire flow of 2000gpm per the Department of Water standards shall double the minimum water supply reserved for firefighting. Fire Department Connections(FDC) to alternative water supplies shall comply with 18.3.8 (l)- (6) of this code. NOTE: In that water catchment systems are being used as a means of water supply for firefighting, such systems shall meet the following requirements: I ) 1n that a single water tank is used for both domestic and firefighting water, the water for domestic use shall not be capable of being drawn from the water reserved for firefighting; 2) Minimum pipe diameter sizes from the water supply to the Fire Department Connection (FDC)shall be as.follows: a) 4" for C90() PVC pipe: b) 4" for C906 PE pipe; c) 3" for ductile Iron; d) 3' for galvanized steel. 3) The Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall: a) be made of galvanized steel; b) have a gated valve with 2-1/2 inch, National Standard Thread male fitting and cap; c) be located between 8 ft and 16 ft from the Fire department access. The location shall be approved by the AHJ; d) not be located less than 24 inches, and no higher than 36 inches from finish grade, as measured from the center of the FDC orifice; be secure and capable of withstanding drafting operations. Engineered stamped plans may be required; I) not be located more than 150 feet of the most remote part,but not less than 20 feet, of the structure being protected; g) also comply with section 13.1.3 and 18.2.3.4.6.1 of this code. 4) Commercial buildings requiring a fire flow of 2000gpm shall be provided with a second FDC;.Each FDC shall be independent of each other, with each FDC being capable of flOwing 500gpm by engineered design standards. The second FDC shall be located in an area approved by the AHJ with the idea of multiple Fire apparatus'conducting drafting operations at once, in mind. 7.endo Kern, Planning Director December 10, 2(120 Pac�e.8 ot'8 5) Inspection and maintenance shall he in accordance to NRA 25. (i) the owner or lessee of the properly shall he responsible for maintaining the watei quality. and appurtenances of the system. EXCEPTIONS TO SECTION 1.8.3.8: l) Agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and shade houses with no combustible or equipment storage. 2) Buildings less than S00 square feet in size that meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirettnents. 3) For onand two family ciwvt9(irt��s, aLricuiitiral buildings, stor$oG:,n%ds, and detached garages S00 to 2000 square feet in size, and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements, the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 1000 feet. 4) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings, and storage sheds greater than 2000squaie feet, but less than 3000 square feet and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements, the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased • to 500 feet. 5) For buildings with an approved automatic sprinkler system, the minimum water supply required may be modified. If there are any questions regarding these requirements, please contact Assistant Fire Chief'Ian Smith at(808) 932-2907. ROBERT R. K. PERREIRA Acting Fire Chief • DAVID Y IGE ELIZABETH A.CHAR,M.D. STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH F6?. P.0.BOX 916 HILO,HI 96721.0916 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 8 2021 TO: Mr. Zendo Kern Planning Director, County of Hawaii FROM: Eric Honda�Z2-\_-_--"L District Environmental Health Program Chief SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20-000054) Request: Agricultural to Urban Applicant: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) TM K: 2-4-001:168 The applicant would need to meet the requirements of our Department of Health Air Pollution Rules, Chapter 60.I, Title 11, State of Hawaii for fugitive dust control. If there is need to discuss these requirements, please contact our Clean Air Branch staff at Ph. 933-0401. The Department of Health (DOH), Clean Water Branch (CWB), acknowledges receipt of the subject document on December 8, 2020. The CWB has reviewed the limited information contained in the subject document and offers the comments: J following Permit Issuance Any project and its potential impacts to State waters must meet the State's: 1) Antidegradation policy, which requires that the existing uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses of the receiving State water be maintained and protected; 2) Designated uses, as determined by the classification of the receiving State waters; and 3) Water quality criteria [Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR), Chapter 11-54], PI 3nnmg .k A Section 401 Water quality Certification (WQC) is required if your �^ project/activity: Requires a federal permit, license, certificate, approval, registration, or Statutory exemption; and 4 i 0 3 P 1 Mayresult in a into State waters. The term "discharge" is dischargea 'Lend? Kern March 8, 2021 Page 2 of 4 defined in Clean Water Act. Subsections 502( 16). 502( 12). and 502(6). Examples of 'discharge'' include. but are not limited to, allowing the following pollutants to enter State waters from the surface it in-water: solid waste. rock/sand/dirt, heat, sewage, construction debris. any underwater work, chemicals. fugitive dust/spray/paint. agricultural wastes. biological materials, industrial wastes. concrelc/sealant/epoxy. and washing/cleaning effluent. Determine if your project/activity requires a federal permit, license. certificate. approval. registration, or statutory exemption by contacting the appropriate federal agencies (e.g. Department of the Army (DA), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), Pacific Ocean Division Honolulu District Office (POH)Tel: 808-835-4303; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Tel: 415-947-8021: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Tel: 866-208-3372-, U.S. Coast-Guard Office of Bridge Programs Tel: 20?.-372-1511). To request a Section 401 WQC, you must complete and submit the Section 401 WQC application. This application is available on the e-Permitting Portal website located at: 0,1.:1.0ii 11.Iv\.�`I Please see 1-JAR, chapter 1 1-54 for the State' Water Quality Standards and for more information on the Section 401 WQC. HAR, Chapter 11-54 is available on the CW.B website at: Id ii tll;,__t;tf=ftat` , f_ • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit coverage is • .required for: -Storm water associated with construction activities for land disturbances of one (1) acre or more, Land disturbance includes, but is not limited to, clearing, grading, grubbing, excavation, demolition, uprooting of vegetation., equipment staging, and storage areas. -Storm water associated with industrial activities for facilities with Standard Industrial Classification Codes regulated in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(i) through (ix) and (xi). -Storm water and certain non-storm water from a small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. • -Discharges of water pollutants into State surface. waters. Examples of these discharges include, but are not limited to,cooling water, hydrotestingwaters, dewatering effluent, and process wastewater. -Discharges from the application of pesticides (including pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, rodenticides, and various other substances to control pest) to State waters. • An-application for an NPDES individual permit must be submitted at least )80 calenclah days before tate cc tstrilencement ofthe•discharge or start cif cOnstru tion. Zendo Kern March 8, 2202I Page 3 of 4 activities. To request and NPDES individual permit, you must complete and submit the NPDES individual permit application. This application is available on the e-Pe•rtnittin e Portal website located at: A Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage under a specific NPDES general permit must he submitted at least 30 calendar clays before the commencement of the discharge or start of construction activities. To request NPDES general permit coverage, you must complete and submit the NOI. The NOl is available on the e-Permitting Portal website located at: • h,li i t 0l h.it‘, Si! :1',0!,V,,i'I?all` Please see HAR, Chapter 11-55 for more information on the NPDES individual permit and NPDES general permits. The specific NPDES general permits located in MAR, Chapter 11-55, Appendices B through M. .1-JAR, Chapter 1 1-55 and BAR, Chapter.l l-55, Appendices B through M are available on the CWB website at: t+it`vi/iK',_llt';t �i.ia�,,{ii �t?t\\hi • According to State law, all discharges related to the project construction or operation activities, whether or not NPDES permit coverage and/or Section 401 WQC are required, must comply with the State's Water Quality Standards. Monitoring • Effluent discharge and/or receiving water monitoring may be required as conditions of Section 401 Water Quality Certifications and NPDES General and Individual permits. Enforcement • Noncompliance with water quality requirements contained in MAR. Chapter 11-54 and/or permitting requirements specified in HAR, Chapter 11-55 may be subject to penalties of$25,000 per day per violation. • Violations of Hawaii Revised Statutes 342D and 342E may elicit administrative, civil and criminal penalties for such violations. Polluted Runoff Control • • Manage projects identified in watershed-based plans that reduce polluted runoff . and educate the public about nonpoint source pollution. Projects are selected through an annual request for proposals. Funding is provided by the EPA through the Clean Water Act. For more information on projects and funding opportunities, please visit_ Gti �, a.tlil'��fkl_ anhi+!Iv ilk ithat daunt if you have any questions, please contact Ms.Joanne Seto, Supervisor of the Engineering Section, CWB, al (808) 586-4309,. „ . . tendo Kern March S. 2021 Page 4 of 4 (_ onstruction activities must comply with the provisions of Hawaii Administrative Rules, Chapter 11,46. -....ti oininunitv Noise Control.” 1. The contractor Inti$1 obtain a noise permit if the noise levels from the construction activities air expected to exceed the allowable levels of the rules. 2. Construction equipment and on-site vehicles requiring an exhaust of gas or air must be equipped with mufflers. 3. The contractor must comply with the requirements pertaining to construction activities as specified in the rules and the conditions issued with the permit. Should there be any questions on this matter, please contact the Department of Health at 933- 0917. We recommend that you review all of the Standard Comments on our website: ,111I Any comments specifically applicable to this project should be adhered to. The same website also features a Healthy Community Design Smart Growth Checklist (Checklist) created by Built Environment Working Group (BEWG) of the Hawaii State Department of Health. The BEWG recommends that. state and county planning departments, developers, planners, engineers and other interested parties apply the healthy built environment principles in the Checklist whenever they plan or review new.developments or redevelopments projects. We also ask you to share this list with others to increase community awareness on healthy community design. SUZANNE D CASE c:r y (MU k zsON DA\111Y.ICE t�-.... <a ,„,,Al,tt1,7>.m<NAl.nl.v; Si%1N'NE D.CASE CHAIRPERSON DAVID Y.IGE BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOI'RCES GOVERNOR OF RANIAD C'OH?1LSSI®V 0S HATEH RESOURCE MANAGEMENT is kyr si `" j STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU.HAWAII 96809 January 19, 2021 County of Hawaii Planning Department Attn: Ms. Tracie-Lee Camero via email: tracie-lee.camero(a hawaiicounty.gov 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Camero: SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20-000054) - Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban - Proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development located at Waiakea, South Hilo Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4-001:168 on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. In addition to our previous comments dated December 29, 2020 and January 7, 2021, enclosed are comments from the Division of Forestry & Wildlife on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (808) 587-0417 or email: darlene.k.nakamura,cni hawaii.gov. Thank you. Sincerely, Russell Tsuji Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures cc: Central Files Plonning DepL. Exhibit 11 139321 o^aa Y ISE ^, .""^^ I ,.".."°v"" `m.1,,1", VlI `"*. ! ` , ~ \ IT: U[ U\u \)/ ou'\x/m[\| oit/^v` \ |('xo.xcvxxre, mn*o� /^w/x / x / o.x^�` ,N1/4v / / ' x\x \n v*." December 7, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: nLNBAoenoies: Div. of Aquatic Resources _Div, of Boating & Ocean Recreation XEngineeriny Division 'DLNQ. goq) }<Div. of Forestry & Wildlife hllvrcisa1ternao ) Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management M(c-Dhaeaii.gov) Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands X Land Division— Hawaii District /Onrdoo-o.heiikicii!ha \ Historic Preservation �o011 T5* FROM: RusseU Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator ~ • SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20-000054) - Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban - Proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohou.fl Affordable Residential Development LOCATION: VV�i�k�a South Hilo Island of Tk8}<' (3) 2-4-001:168 . Hawaii; � APPLICANT: County of Hawaii, Department of Planning on behalf of Hawaii island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter which can be found at: hth3�!//havvahO/rni- mv.eha/epoinLconi:[:/g/parsonmKdadene knakanoure poy/Ev1Aw- ov4Jd OqbSNi Nio T Please submit comments by December 28, 2020. If no response is received by the above date, we will assume your agency haS no comments. Should you have any questions about this request, p\oeoeoontoct Darlene Nakamura a(daLlene.k.nakamuraf1D . Thank you ( ) We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. /Z) Comments are attached. �U& Signed: Print Narne: DAVID G. SMITH, Administrator Division of Forestry and Wildlife Division: Jan 13IO2� Date: Attacbmentslnt Files ("NSF 1).‘110 ! �..e, H .•.IP . .... . I. 1AP•u\o5g yr .•I`.i. .1.I... i .,l;. r.l:.. r::! Nfl!7:.H'I ..\I.\.I.11\ • • R 1 I q�f K •�'�� \I I \ lfl ll lhl ll. STATE OF HAWA II lit I\kNI tir tANI) AND NArt'RA I. I:IattlBiu(t.� DIvtir!)ti OF FOR1.STRY AND V.11_1,1.111' i5 I I't [Mom t ;' 1-10i`oLtrr.U..11,,mAii lni•.mr; January 1-?. 20?I ,MEMORANDUM Log no. 2967 TO: RUSSELL Y. TSUJI. Administrator Land Division FROM: DAVID G. SMITH, Administrator Division of Forestry and Wildlife SUBJECT: Division of Forestry and Wildlife Comments for the State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 20-000054)—Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban — Proposed Hale Ola o Mohouli Affordable Residential Development The Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW) has received your inquiry regarding the state land use boundary amendment for the proposed Hale Ola o Mohouli in Hilo on the Island of Hawaii. TMK: (3) 2-4-001:168. The proposed project consists of expanding the existing senior residences by constructing up to 90 additional affordable residential units. The State listed Hawaiian Hawk or'Io (Buten so/zlarius) is known to occur in the project vicinity, DOFAW recommends surveying the area to ensure no Hawaiian Hawk nests are present if trees are to be cut. lo nests might be present during the breeding season from March to September. The State listed Hawaiian Hoary Bat or `Ope'ape'a (Lasitrrus cinereus sernotns) has the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project area and may roost in nearby trees. If any site clearing is required this should be timed to avoid disturbance during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15). If this cannot he avoided, woody plants greater than 15 feet(4.6 meters) tall should not be disturbed, removed. or trimmed without consulting DOFA W. To prevent the spread of Rapid 'C)hi'a Death (ROD). if ohi'a trees are present and will be removed, trimmed, or potentially injured DOFAW requests that the information and guidance at the fallowing website be reviewed and followed: hens:/!cram.ctahr.ha\\`aii.cduirod. DOFAW recommends minimizing the movement ofplant or soil material between worksites, such as in fill. Soil and plant material may contain invasive fungal pathogens(e.g. Rapid 'Ohi'a Death), vertebrate and invertebrate pests (e.g. Little Fire Ants), or invasive plant parts that could harm our native species and ecosystems. We recommend consulting the Big Island Invasive Species Committee at (808) 933-3340 in planning, design, and construction of the project to learn of any high-risk invasive species in the area and ways to mitigate spread. All equipment, materials, and personnel should be cleaned of excess soil and debris to minimize the risk of spreading invasive species. Gear that may contain soil.such as work boots and vehicles.should be thoroughly cleaned with water and sprayed with 70% alcohol solution to prevent the spread of Rapid `Ohi`a Death and other harmful fungal pathogens. We note that artificial lighting can adversely impact seabirds that may pass through the area at night b) causing disorientation. .I his disorientation can result in collision with manmade artifacts or grounding of birds. For nighttime lighting that might be required. DOFA\\ recommends that all lights be fully shielded to minimize impacts. Nighttime work that requires outdoor lighting should be avoided during the seabird fledging season From September 15 through December 15. This is the period when young seabirds tike their maiden voyage to the open sea. For illustrations and guidance related to seabird-friendly light styles that also protect the dark, starry skies of Hawai'ihttp P lease visit: s://dlnr.hawaii.�,tovivvildlifeifiles/2011/031DOC439.pol'. ! We appreciate your efforts to work with our office for the conservation of our native species. Should the scope of the project change significantly. or should it become apparent that threatened or endangered species may be impacted, please contact our staff as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact Koa!vlatsuoka, Protected Species Habitat Conservation Planning Associate at(808) 587-4149 or koa_rnatsuuka;ii',hawaii.eov. Sincerely, DAVID G. SMITH Administrator _ SUZANNE D.CASE Y.1GE ,r CHAIRPERSON GDV DAVID o>'NAVdJn BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOL RC ES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE �Y MANAGEMENT Y � s fLr � STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND{N.VIUR.- I,RIS000RCES LAND DIN ISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 December 29, 2020 County of Hawaii Planning Department Attn: Ms. Tracie-Lee Camero via email: tracie-lee.camero('la hawaiicounty.gov 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Camera: SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20-000054) - Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban - Proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development located at Waiakea, South Hilo Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4-001:168 on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Land Division of the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) distributed or made available a copy of your request pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR's Divisions for their review and comments. At this time, enclosed are comments from the (a) Engineering Division and (b) Land Division-Hawaii District on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (808) 587-0417 or email: darlene.k.nakamura(a hawaii.gov. Thank you. Sincerely, Ru,s-c6,(4, 7"cc5g- Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures cc: Central Files 1Planning Deng. Exhibit12 • .. �` �'..v".../ o=m, "IF '' `^^' ` ° ~ , . '\ � ",//.`".`,"n"" p,""^ .`' `� '"""~~`^.""`"^".""". I • ^~ `` :oy .• • ST- T[ o[ K'\x,AU v/rumm ` o/ /'\v^m` ‘|( o\ xuxxx(u` /o/`m`mm m*'xw/.x\x4/ `wo December 7, 2020 MEMORANDUM f8: DLNR Agencies: _Div. of Aquatic Resources ]iv. of Boating &Ocean Recreation )X(Engineering Division (DLNFiENGl(Ci)hom/aiigov) X Div. of Forestry& VN|dUfe (rubynrsa.t.bo/oaqo(chawaiioov) Div. of State Parks )iCommission on Water Resource Management (DLNR.0 havaii^ooy) Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands X Land Division — Hawaii District (gordono.heiihawaii.qov) Historic Preservation kti.5.5011 /sqii f-frefit- Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20'000054) - Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban -Proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development LOCATION: VVmiakee. South Hilo Island nfHawaii; TWiK: /3\2'4-OO11G8 APPLICANT: County of Hawaii, Department of Planning on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (H|CDC) Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter which can be found at: • https://hawaiioimt- my.sharepoint.com/t/g/oersonal/darlene k nakarnura havvaii gov/Ev1Avv- pv4Jd(}v9*xSpsJU'gB3UDub9Ni Tu5aTzczNVrPw?e=[YTJdT Please submit comments by December 28, 2020. If no response is received by the, above date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at dadene.koakomunaahmvvoh.gov. Thank you. • ( ) We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. (v/ ) Comments attached. Signed: g-Z? Print Name: Carty S. Cheng, Chief Engineer Division: Engineering Division Date: Dec]3,2Q2O Attachments/cc: Central Files DEPARTMENT OFLAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION 1.1)/R ussell V. Tsuji Ref: State land t se ISnundary Amendment (51.1.. 20-1)0005-4) - Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban - Proposed Hale Ola O N'lohouli Affordable Residential Development Locatiou: lVaiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii Ti\IK(s): (3) 2-4-001:168 Applicant: County of Hawaii, Department- of Planning on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) • COMMENTS • The rules and regulations of the Notional Flood Insurance Program t\F IP),Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (4.4CFR).are in effect when development falls within a Special Flood Hazard Area(high risk areas). State projects are required to comply with 14CFR regulations as stipulated in Section 60.12. Be advised that 4-1CFR reflects the minimum standards as set forth by the NFIP. Local community flood ordinances may stipulate higher standards that can he more restrictive and would take precedence over the minimum NFIP standards. The owner of the project property and/or their representative is responsible to research the Flood Hazard Zone designation for the project. Flood Hazard Zones are designated en .FENIi\'s Flood insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), which can be viewed on our Flood hazard Assessment Tool (FHAT) (http://gis.hawaiinfip.org/FHA`I ). 4 If there are questions regarding the local flood ordinances. please contact the applicable ('aunty NFIP coordinating agency below: o Oahu: City and County of Honolulu. Department of Planning and Permitting (803) 763-8098. 0 1 lav aii Island: County of Hawaii. Department of Public V orks(808) 961-8327. o Maui/Molokai/Lanai County of Maui, Department of Planning (808) 270-7253. o Kauai: County of Kauai. Department of Public Works (808)24i-4896. 0-16'; Signed: CARTY S. CHANG. CHIEF ENGINEER Date: Dec 23, 2020 /.0 OAVID Y r Is lii<rt.ltiON / S111r,111(Hill l(f • I Ari OF HAWAII i 111 (IF 1 011, \D NA-11 1:11 RI ',(11 Ili I AN1)11111S1cr1 1 1 UI )1 WO,A14 December 7, 2020 • MEMORANDUM TO: DLNR Agencies: _ Div. of Aquatic Resources Div. of Boating &Ocean Recreation X Engineering Division (DLNR.ENGR( hawaii.gov) X Div. of Forestry&Wildlife (robvrosa.t.te,rraeo a hawaii..ov) Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management(DLNR.CWW/1(aThawaii.gov) Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands , ; „.., -Land'DiViSidn'7HOINElii Distriat'(aordorteAtelighaWaii.00V) Historic Preservation Russell rstof FROM: Russell.Y.Tsuji, Land Administrator SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 20-000054)- Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban - Proposed Hale-Ola 0 Mohoull Affordable Residential Development LOCATION: Waiakea, South Hilo island of Hawaii:-FMK: (3)2-4-001:188 APPLICANT: County of Hawaii, Department of Planning on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Transmitted for your review and comment is informatibn an the above-referenced subject matter which can be found al: https://ltawaiioirnt- inv,sharcooint,comi:Uq/personaltdarlene k nakamura hawaii gov/EvlAw- pv4J(10v9‘..vxS_psJU-gB3iDgb9Ni Tu5aTzczNorP•At?e=fYTJdT Please submit comments by December 28, 2020. If no response is received by the above date: we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at ciarIene.k.nakaintirWhawaii.p_Ov. Thank you. viv\Ne have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. ) Comments are attached. Signed: : dire • Print Name: orrDatti C. /4 , 7 • Division: 2--6,v1c4' J}/j'/J/e'A Date: Y/2-49 Attachments/cc: Central Files SLLANN E U.CASE CHAIRPERSON DAVID Y.IGE HOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOCRCF_S GOVERNOR 01,HAWAII fOdSNLSSION ON\V.S7ER RESUCRCE ,4 MANAGEMENT t \- :z,7-- .. STATE OF HAWAII `- DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 021 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 January 7, 2021 County of Hawaii Planning Department Attn: Ms. Trade-Lee Camero via email: tracie-lee_camero(a hawaiicounty.gov 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Camero: SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20-000054) - Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban - Proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development located at Waiakea, South Hilo Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4-001:168 on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. In addition to our previous comments dated December 29, 2020, enclosed are comments from the Commission on Water Resource Management on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (808) 587-0417 or email: , darlene.k.nakamura @..hawaii.gov. Thank you. Sincerely, Ras-e-&; 7✓sujr% Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures cc: Central Files 1 Nanning Dew, Exhibit 13 ' ElAVIO Y in> f.1+.171`..NNE cxer 1 k • AM.-NA BEAM-P., D MICHAEL 0 130111( ELIZABETH A C.11,\B.M.D NEIL J I IANNt.1-119.. '1.4:(..YI1JE V. K.:. AMP PAUL J MEYER MAIIHE STATE OF HAWAII .,.— DE''ARiNIENT OF LAND A'.D HA URAL RESOUP.CES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 20 X 611 January 7,2021 REF: RFD.5539.8 TO: Mr. Russell Tsuji,Administrator Land Division FROM: M.Kaleo Manuel,Deputy Director 161W2 Commission on Water Re-source Management SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 20-000054)-Request to Change-from Agriculture to Urban-Proposed Hale Ole 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development FILE NO.: RFD.5539.8 TMK NO,: (3)2-4-001:168 Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject document. The Commission on Water Resource Management(CWRM)is the agency responsible for administering the State Water Code(Code), Under the Code, all waters of the State are held in trust for the benefit of the citizens of the State,therefore all water use is subject to legally protected water rights. CWRM strongly promotes the efficient use pf Hawaii's water resources through conservation measures and appropriate resource management. For more information,please refer to the State Water Code, Chapter'174C,Hawaii Revised Statutes,and Hawaii Administrative Rules, Chapters 13-167 to 13-171. These documents are available via the Internet et http://dInr.hawaii.goviewrm. Our comments related to water resources are checked off below. ri1. We recommend coordination with the county to incorporate this project into the county's Water Use and Development Plan. Please contact the respective Planning Department and/pr Department of Water Supply fbr further information. [ 1 2, We recommend coordination With the Engineering Division of the State Department of Land and Natural Resources to incorporate this project into the State Water Projects Plan. 3. We recommend coordination with the Hawaii Department of Agriculture(HDOA)to incorporate the reclassification of agricultural zoned land and the redistribution of agricultural resources into the State's Agricultural Water Use and Development Plan(AWUDP). Please contact the HOOA for more information. [X j 4. We recommend that water efficient fixtures he installed and water efficient practices implemented throughout the development to reduce the increased demand on the area's freshwater resources. Reducing the water usage of a home or building may earn credit towards Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design(LEED)certification, More information on LEED certification is available at httpl/www.usgbc.orgileed. A listing of fixtures certified by the EAP as having high water efficiency can be found at http://Mvw.epa.gov/watersense. --X-1 5. We recommend the use of best management practices(BMP)for stormwater management to minimize the impact of the project to the existing area's hydrology while maintaining on-site infiltration and preventing polluted runoff from storm events. Stormwater management Blv1Ps may earn credit toward LEED certification. More information on stormwater BillPs can be found at httpliplanning.hawail.goviczmiinitiativestlow-impact-development/ ri6. We recommend the use of alternative water sources,wherever practicable. [1] 7. We recommend participating in the Hawaii Green Business Program,that assists and recognizes businesses that strive to operate in an environmentally and socially responsible manner.The program descripticin can be found-online at httpillenergy,hawaii.gov/green-business-program. X 8. We recommend adopting landscape irrigation conservation best management practices endorsed by the tandtcape Industry Council ofFlawaii.These practices can be found online at • Mr. Russell Tsuji Page 2 • January 7, 2021 hhpa/www.ha.faiiscape_comiwp-contentjuploads!2013104iLICH_Irrigation__Conservalion_BM1Ps.pdf. I 9. There may be the potential for ground or surface water degradation/contamination and recornrnene that approvals for this project be conditioned upon a review by the Stale Department of Health and the developers acceptance of any result ne requirements related to water quality • I _I 10 The proposed water supply source for the project is located in a designated water management area,and • a Water Use Permit is required prior to use of water. The Water Use Permit may be conditioned on the requirement to use dual line water supply systems for new industrial and commercial developments. I-1 1 1 A Well Construction Permit(s)is(are)are required before the commencement of any welt construction • wort;. 12 A Pump Installation Permit(s)is(are)required before ground water is developed as a source of supply for the project. 13 There is(are)well(s)located on or adjacent to this project. If wells are not planned to be used and will be affected by any new construction,they must be properly abandoned and sealed. A permit for well abandonment must be obtained. 14 Ground-water withdrawals from this project may affect streamftows,which may require an instream flow standard amendment. • 15 A Stream Channel Alteration Permit(s)is(are)required before any alteration can be made to the bed and/or banks of a steam channel. 16 A Stream Diversion Works Permit(s)Is(are)required before any stream diversion works is constructed or altered. t l 17 A Petition to Amend the Interim Instream Flow Standard is required for any new or expanded diversion(s) of surface water. II 18 The planned source of water for this project has not been identified in this report. Therefore,we cannot determine what permits.or petitions are required from our office,or whether there are potential impacts to water resources. I I OTHER: Planning-The State Water Code requires each county to update its water use and development plans as necessary to maintain consistency with its zoning and land use policies(§174C-31 HRS). Should a change in zoning be approved for this project,please coordinate with the respective Planning Department and/or Department of Water Supply to incorporate this project into the county water use and development plan. The proposed water source(s)and projected water demands for the project,both potable and non- potable,should be identified and the calculations used to estimate demands should be provided. A discussion of the potential impacts on water resources'and other public trust uses of water should be included,and any proposed mitigation measures described. Water conservation and efficiency measures to be implemented should also be discussed. . If you have any questions,please contact Lenore Ohye of the Commission staff at 587-0216. • r AND t; {. SI 1)2iL;11% 1,tonf.i. I Hi am! \\ Illlil�: **IIIc: In Reply Rear To: December 23, 2020 olEri oo•2o2t-51.-dllt Mr. Michael Yee Director, Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street Hilo, Hawai`i 96720 Subject: Technical Assistance for proposed State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 20-000054)of TMK (3) 2-4-001:168, Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project, Hilo, Hawai`i Dear Mr. Yee: Thank you for your recent correspondence requesting technical assistance on species biology, habitat, or life requisite requirements. The Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office(PIFWO) of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(Service) appreciates your efforts to avoid or minimize effects to protected species associated with your proposed actions. We provide the following information for your consideration under the authorities of the Endangered Species Act(ESA) of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), as amended. Due to significant workload constraints, PIFWO is currently unable to specifically address your information request. The table below lists the protected species most likely to be encountered by projects implemented within the Hawaiian Islands. Based on your project location and description, we have noted the species most likely to occur within the vicinity of the project area, in the "Occurs In or Near Project Area"column. Please note this list is not comprehensive and should only be used for general guidance. We have added to the PIFWO website, located at httn ://www,lws.gov/pacificislandsipromo.cfrOid-177175840 where you can find recommended conservation measures intended to avoid or minimize adverse effects to these federally protected species and best management practices to minimize and avoid sedimentation and erosion impacts to water quality. If you or the project proponent are representing a federal action agency,please use the official species list on our web-site for your section 7 consultation. You can find out if your project occurs in or near designated critical habitat here: https:/Iecos.fws.gov/ipac/. INTERIOR REGION 9 INTERIOR REGION 12 COLUMBIA—PACIFIC NORTHWEST PACIFIC ISLANDS IDAHO, MONTANA OREGON*, WASHINGTON AMERICAN SAMOA. GUAM. HAWAII. NORTHERN r,ann'`t MARIANA ISLANDS Planning De-p;, Exhibit_, 14 • Mr. Michael Yee - l hider section 7 of the lar\. it is the Federal agency's for their nom-Federal designee) responsihilitto make the determination of whether or not the proposed project."may affect- federally listed species or designated critical habitat. A "may affect. not likely to adversely affect" determination is appropriate when effects to fedcrall\ listed species are expected to be discountable (i.e.. unlikely to occur), insignificant (minimal in size). or completely beneficial. This conclusion requires written concurrence from the Service. I H "may ,!fleet, likely to adversely affect- determinatioli is made. then the Federal a tencv must initiate formal consultation with the Service. Projects that are determined to have "no effect- on federally listed species and/or critical habitat do not require additional coordination or consultation. Implementing the avoidance, minimization, or conservation measures for the species that may occur in your project area will normally enable you to make a "may affect, not likely to adversely affect"determination for your project. If it is determined that the proposed project may affect federally listed species, we recommend you contact our office early in the planning process so that we may assist you with the ESA compliance. If the proposed project is funded, authorized, or permitted by a f=ederal agency, then that agency should consult with us pursuant to section 7(a)(2)of the ESA. if no Federal agency is involved with the proposed project, the applicant should apply for an incidental take permit under section 10(a)(I)(B) of the ESA. A section 10 permit application must include a habitat conservation plan that identifies the effects of the action on listed species, species habitats, and defines measures to minimize and mitigate those adverse effects. We appreciate your efforts to conserve endangered species. We regret that we cannot provide you with more specific protected species information for your project site. If you have questions that are not answered by the information on our website, you can contact PIFWO at (808) 792- 9400 or pifwo_adminfrJfws,gov and ask to speak to the lead biologist for the island where your project is located. Sincerely, DIA( EDigitally signed by pp DIANE SH ER 5 ETH E fl3 3:41562010'00' Island Team Manager Pacific islands Fish and Wildlife Office Mr. Michael Y cc protected species most likely to he encountered by projects The table below liststhe 1 by within the Hawaiian Islands. For your guidance. we have marked species that may occur in the vicinity of your project: this list is not comprehensive and should only be used for Gu eneral :iiilancc. Scientific Name I Common Naiue / Federal May Occur Ilaw•aiian Name Status In Project Area _ /Mammals I - Las/ ins rincrcus scnwnts i Hawaiian hoary bat/ E Ly! 'ope'atpc' t__ _ Reptiles E C'hclurticr nrrcicrs Green sea t urtle/hone T ❑ - Central North Pacific distinct population segment Eicctinuohe/vs in bricrrta Hawksbill sea turtle! t l: n -1ono 'co jBirds ---- --- ---- --- .. _--_ Anus ti'vvilliana Hawaiian duck/ F ❑ koloa — Branla sandi icensis Hawaiian goose! T r nen(-- Fnlica alai Haw aiian coot/ C "1 -nine kea Ga//linela galeata Hawaiian gallinule! E ❑ sandvic•en.Sis 'nine. 'lla - 1linYantopeis mexiCan21s Hawaiian stilt/ E IA /cieiidseeii Ae'o _ Oceanodrnrua castr'o Hawaii distinct population E lel segment band-romped storm-petrel/ -akee'ake Prc.^rodrvnur s'undit,ichensis Hawaiian petrel/ 'ua'u I E f Pt/Ants auricularis is newelli Newell's shearwater! T %e 'a`0 Ardenna paci/ices Wedge-tailed Shearwater/ MBTA LI 'ua'a kani Buie°solirarius Hawaiian hawk! i MBTA f] 'io G,t-gis alba I White Tern! MBIA LI I Manu-o-ku Insects Alanduca hlockbrnni Blackburn's sphinx moth I E j 0 A./egalagrion pacific um Pacific f-Iawaiian Damselfly — E j ❑ -___ Al. .xanthonrelus Orangeblac.k Hawaiian E ❑ Damsel fly J Mr. Michael Vee 4 t M. ui;grohcnnutnm 1 Blackiine Hawaiian • E ❑ ,ri!'r•nlincatan ; Damselfly Plants laths Scientific Name Common Natue Federal Locations May or Status Occur in Hawaiian Name Project { Area 41,111il0u ntcii:iesii Ko`oloa-ula E (Ti, L, Ni. II ❑ ____ .,lchi'ranthes splendeirs 'Ewa hinahina E 0 ❑ var. rotruiclnia 13onamia nren_iesii No common name L K, 0, L, Ni. II ❑ Cancri'alia puhe.scen.s `Awikiwiki E Ni, K, L, M ❑ C'olubrina oppositil"olio Kauila E 0, Ni, H ❑ C'perir.s t•achysanthos Pu`uka'a E K, 0 U Gouania hillehrandii No common name E Mo, M .l-Iibiscus bracicenridgei Nia'o hau bele E 0, Mo, L, Ni, H ❑ Ischcrenium burone Hilo ischaernum E K, 0, Mo, M, H ❑ Isodendrion pi'ri/olitrnr Wahine noho kula E 0, H ❑ Mars ilea a'illosa 'lhi`ihi E Ni, 0, Mo ❑ Alezoneuron kavaiense Uhiuhi E 0, H ❑ P''othocestruni breviflorum `Aiea E H• —__ ❑ Panicwn fi-nirici var. Carter's F Molokini Islet(0), ❑ carted panicgrass Mo Panicum niihauense Lau'ehu E K ❑ Petrccdantmi sanciwicense Makou E K, 0, Mo, Ni ❑ Pleomele (Chrysodracon) Flalapepe E H ❑ Itawaiit psis Portulaca seierocar pa 'lh i E L, H ❑ Portulaca villosa 'lhi E Le, Ka,Ni, 0, Mo, ❑ NI, L, H,Nihoa Pritchardia aJJinis Loulu E H ❑ (nraiclenianal Pseudogncrphaliuni 'Ina'ena E Mo,.iM ❑ sant/iv/cc/is/um var. mulokaiense Scaevolcr coriacea Dwarf naupaka E Mo, N'1 ❑ Schenkia (C'entauriuun) `A-wiwi E K, 0, Mo, L. M ❑ sebaeoides Sesbania tonienlosa `Ohai . E Ni, Ka, K, 0, Mo, Ni, ❑ L, I-.L.Necker,Nihoa Teiraniolopium rocldi No common name T Mo LI 1 i \\cMichael Yee 5 — ----------- - ---- � ---- \ ---- L. H. ---' [— []--- [��ocnrux»oo nun c /TL ��o, xJ. xu L^L:u/imnkey: 0-0-:hu, IK=Kuuu'i >l~NlxoiL Ku~Ka| /obx'e. Le [chuu Rhawai`ilslandComnunityDevelopmentCorporation(HICDC)SLU.10/5/2021 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION HAWAII ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (HICDC) STATE LAND USE DISTRICT BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (SLU 20- 000054) Upon careful review of the request, the Planning Director recommends that a favorable recommendation for the State Land Use Boundary Amendment be forwarded to the County Council. Since this recommendation is made without the benefit of public testimony, the Director reserves the right to modify and/or alter this position based upon additional information presented at the public hearing. The favorable recommendation is based on the following findings: The applicant, the Hawai`i Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC), is requesting a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban for 9.09 acres of land, which is the future site of the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project. The applicant intends to develop 90-units of affordable housing which aims to provide afforable housing and related services on a parcel in South Hilo, which was made available by the Govenors Executive Order No. 4531. According to the applicant, the proposed affordable housing development will seek exemptions from certain code requirements, pursuant to HRS 201H-38 of the Hawai`i Revised Statues for the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project from the County Council through a resolution submitted by the County of Hawai`i Office of Housing and Community Development. Construction of the proposed affordable housing project is anticipated to begin in early 2022 and be completed by the end of 2023. The completion of the full project will be dependent on funding availability and is expected to be completed by 2024. The total cost of the proposed projectis estimated at$30 to $40 million. The approval of the reclassification from the State Land Use Agricultural to the Urban District for approximately 9.09 acres will not be in violation of Section 205-2, Chapter 205, Hawaii Revised Statutes, nor will it be inconsistent -1- with the Land Use Commission Rules, the County General Plan and the Hawaii State Plan.Under the Land Use Commission Rules, one of the standards for considering an area for urban reclassification states that, "In determining urban growth for the next ten years, or in amending the boundary, land contiguous with existing urban areas shall be given more consideration than non-contiguous land, and particularly when indicated for future urban use on state or county general plans."The project area conforms to this standard as it is situated adjacent to existing urban-designated lands to the south and is designated for future urban growth(Medium Density Urban) on the County's Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide(LUPAG) map in the General Plan. According to the General Plan, the MDU designation allows for village and neighborhood commercial and single family and multiple family residential and related functions (multiple family residential -- up to 35 units per acre). Thus, the SLU Boundary Amendment is consistent with the LUPAG MDU designation. Finally, the reclassification action would be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Hawai`i State Plan by providing urban type uses in close proximity to existing urban areas where adequate public facilities are already available and converting marginal or non-essential agricultural lands for appropriate urban uses while maintaining more productive agricultural lands in the agricultural district. The Urban District request would be consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use and Housing elements of the General Plan. The Urban District request would be consistent with the goals,policies and standards of the Land Use-Multiple Family Residential and the Housing Elements of the Hawai`i County General Plan by encouraging the construction of affordable housing. The Urban classification conforms to the standard that the development is within reasonable proximity to centers of trading and employment and to basic services such as schools, police and fire protection, transportation systems and water. Access to the subject property is proposed from Kupuna Place by way of an easement over the adjacent parcel TMK: (3) 2-4-001:176 and Mohouli Street, both County roadways. Kupuna Place is a two-lane paved roadway with an existing pavement -2- width of 32 feet within a 50 feet right-of-way. Mohouli Street is classified as a major collector road with an existing pavement width of 80 feet. The applicant conducted a Traffic Impact Assessment Report (TIAR) dated November 2020,prepared by AECOM Technical Services, Inc. The proposed affordable housing is anticipated to generate 48 a.m. peak hour trips and 68 p.m. peak hour trips. The TIAR concluded that traffic from the proposed affordable housing is expected to be minor. Additionally, the TIAR recommended the implementation of a right-in/right-out access on Mohouli Street with restriping part of the wide paved shoulder on westbound Mohouli Street as a right-turn only lane. At this time, the applicant is proposing full movement access on Kupuna Place as well as the right-in/right-out access on Mohouli Street to accomodate traffic generated by the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development. Furthermore, DPW has indicated all driveway connections and construction to allow connection to Kupuna Place and Mohouli Street will require Right-of-Way permits and will need to conform to Chapter 22, County Streets, of the Hawai`i County Code. Finally, DPW recommends that the applicant install streetlights and traffic control devices as may be required by their Traffic Division. According to the Department of Water Supply, County water can be made available to the property from the existing 12-inch waterline along Mohouli Street as well as along Kupuna Place. This waterline is also adequate to provide the required flow for fire protection. The applicant will connect to the County sewer system, which is available along Kahikini Street in the adjacent subdivision to the north via easements along TMKS: (3) 2-4-001:176 and 2-4-001:177. The applicant indicated that all waste generated by the project will be disposed of at appropriate sites designated by the Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Solid Waste Division. The applicant will comply with Federal, State and County laws, codes, rules, regulations and requirements for this project. Police, fire protection and emergency medical services are located in Hilo, less than two miles from the property. Electricity cable and telephone are available to the site. Urban Districts shall include lands characterized by"city-like" concentrations of people, structures, streets, urban level of services and other related land uses. This proposed reclassification action does not represent the creation of -3- a new urban concentration, as the surrounding area is already an urban-like environment. Adjacent to the subject property to the east is a 5.35-acre parcel that has been designated for the Fire Administration Support Complex. Phase 1, 2 and 3 of the Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood are located further to the east and were established via County Council resolution using the HRS 201H-38 provision for exemptions from County Code. Properties located to the west and northwest, north and northeast consist of single-family dwellings on land zoned A-1a and RS-10 that are part of the Sunrise Ridge Estate Subdivision. Additionally,properties to the east across Komohana Street and along Mohouli Street consist of single-family dwellings on lands zoned RS-10. The property located at the southeast corner of Komohana Street and Mohouli Street is designated UNV by the General Plan, for the use by the University of Hawai`i at Hilo. Other land uses within a half-mile radius to the south of the subject property include medical offices and the University Park, which houses a number of research and technical support facilities for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Basin Agricultural Research Center and the astronomical observatories on Mauna Kea. Additionally, the Wailani Project District was approved in 2004 and is situated to the North(mauka) of subject property.As these urban type uses are located within the area, the urbanization of the project site will not contribute towards scattered urban development and be generally compatible with the surrounding area. The reclassification action would conform to the following goals, objectives and/or policies of the housing element articulated in the Hawaii State Plan.The request would be consistent with the following goals, objectives and/or policies articulated in the Hawai`i State Plan as it will provide greater opportunities for Hawai`i's families to secure reasonably priced, safe and liveable housing located in suitable environments in areas in which housing has become scarce and costly. • Seek to use marginal or non-essential agricultural land and public land meet housing needs of low and moderate-income and gap-group households. • Effectively accommodate the housing needs of Hawai`i's people. -4- • Stimulate and promote feasbile approaches that increase housing choises for low-income, moderate-income and gap-group households. • Promote design and location of housing developments taking into account the physical setting, accessibility to public facilities and services, and other concerns of existing communities and surrounding areas. Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the policies outlined in the Hawai`i State Plan. The properties have no severe geological or topographical problems which cannot be properly rectified, or which would render the land unusable. According to the Department of Public Works—Engineering Division, the subject parcel is in an area designated as Zone X on the Flood Insurnace Rate Map (FIRM) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Zone X is an area determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain. All development-generated runoff will be disposed of on site and not directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study will be prepared and recommended drainage system will be constructed meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works. All earthwork activity, including grading and grubbing, will conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentation Control, of the Hawai`i County Code. Any improvements to the subject property must comply with Chapter 27 of the Hawai`i County Code, relating to Floodplain Management. Thus, the reclassification meets the standard which states that the lands included within the urban district, "...shall be those with satisfactory topography and drainage and reasonably free from the danger of floods, tsunami and unstable soil conditions and other adverse environmental effects. " While the subject property is located within the State Land Use Agricultural and County's Agricultural (A-la) zoned district, it has been vacant of any uses for several years and is not classified as Important Agricultural Land. The State of Hawai`i Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH) Map classifies the subject property as "Unclassified." The Land Use Study Bureau's Overall Master Productivity Rating classifies the property as "D"or"Poor."The U.S.D.A. Soil Survey classifies the soils within the subject property as Keaukaha Series, Keaukaha extremely rocky muck with 6 to 20 percent slopes. The soil consists of well-drained thin organic -5- soils overlying pahoehoe lava bedrock. The soil above the lava is rapidly permeable. The pahoehoe lava is very slowly permeable but water runs rapidly through the cracks. Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is slight. The Hawai`i Right to Farm Act, HRS Chapter 165, was enacted to protect farming operations on land in the State Land Use Agricultural District when adjacent land is reclassified out of the Agricultural District. A condition of approval will require the applicant to notify prospective purchasers, tenants or lessees of the Hawai`i Right to Farm Act. The reclassification of the 9.09-acre area from the Agricultural to Urban State Land Use designation will not be detrimental to the reduction of this area from the agricultural land inventory in the County of Hawai`i. Furthermore, an Urban classification would complement the existing and future land use pattern of the surrounding area in view of the.urban uses already in existence in close proximity to the subject property. Based on the above, the approval of the State Land Use Boundary Amendment from the Agricultural to the Urban District complements the State Land Use,District Regulations and County General Plan and is supportive of the Hawaii State Plan. The accompanying draft bill to amend the State Land Use Boundary Map is provided for your favorable consideration. Please note the proposed conditions of approval attached to the draft bill. -6- COUNTY OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII .+r'rE.oF•N BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. (PLANNING DEPT.) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STATE LAND USE BOUNDARIES MAPS FOR THE COUNTY OF HAWAII BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM THE AGRICULTURAL TO THE URBAN DISTRICT AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII TAX MAP KEY: 2-4-001:168. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. The State Land Use Boundaries Maps for the County of Hawai`i are amended to change the district classification of property described hereinafter as follows: The district classification of the following area situated at Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii, shall be Urban: Beginning at the southeast corner of this parcel of land, on the east boundary of Lot 180 as shown on Map 73 of Land Court Application 1205 and at a jog on the north side of Mohouli Street, the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station"HALAI"being 4745.09 feet South and 1023.39 feet West, thence running by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: 1. 206° 53' 52" 335.82 feet along Lots 180, 179 and 178 as shown on Map 73 of the Land Court Application 1205; 2. 253° 59' 52" 710.47 feet along Lots 178, 177, 176, 175, 174 and 173 as shown on Map 73 of Land Court Application 1205; 3. 356° 22' 643.58 feet along Public Safety and Related Purposes Site, Governor's Executive Order 4223; I� I 4. Thence along the north side of Mohouli Street on a curve to the right with a radius of 1950.00 feet, the chord azimuths and distance being: 99° 31' 34" 887.88 feet to the point of beginning and containing an AREA OF 9.091 ACRES. All as shown on the map attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2. This change in district classification is conditioned upon the following: A. INSERT CONDITIONS SECTION 3. In the event that any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other parts of this ordinance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAII , Hawai`i Date of Introduction: Date of 1st Reading: Date of 2nd Reading: Effective Date: -2- CHawai`ilslandCommunityDevelopmentCorporation(HICDC)SLU.10/5/2021 HAWAII ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (HICDC) STATE LAND USE DISTRICT BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (SLU-20-000054) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • A. The applicant(s), its successor(s) or assign(s) shall notify prospective purchasers, tenants, or lessees of all lots that farming operations and practices on adjacent or contiguous land in the State Land Use Agricultural District are protected under Hawai`i Revised Statutes Chapter 165, the Hawai`i Right to Farm Act. This notice shall be included in any disclosure required for the sale or transfer of all of the proposed lots. B. Any action that would interfere with or restrain farming operations on adjacent or contiguous properties shall be prohibited under Hawai`i Revised Statutes Chapter 165, the Hawaii Right to Farm Act,provided the farming operations are conducted in a manner consistent with generally accepted agricultural and management practices on adjacent or contiguous lands in the Agricultural District. i 1 Ni • et, • # tliaktiiiftft • • URBAN ♦ •iI%, . AGRICULTURAL ` , 0\-\ 4. 4- )jURAL * 04__URBAN k*L. AGRIC► ,,- , , , AGRICULTURAL4 1-0 111 O URBAN y �Pv RBAN 92761 � J�P 4 U r URBAN O J�\5( P 0p� 4,745 09 S 1,023 39'E "HALM" AGRICULTURAL AGRICULTURAL ' AGRICULTURAL TO URBAN 9.091 ACRES • N Feet 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 AMENDMENT TO THE STATE LAND USE BOUNDARIES MAPS AMENDING THE STATE LAND USE BOUNDARIES MAP FOR THE COUNTY OF HAWAI'I, BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM THE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO THE URBAN DISTRICT AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAI'I MAP PREPARED BY: COUNTY OF HAWAII, PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE:November29,2020 TMK:(3)2-4-001:168 EXHIBIT"A" HICDC Map 20-202 st r a - Dctittop DC ) STATE -LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT SLU - 20 - 000054 , , _ ...... ..... ... .;;;.-; '---.• ---..1'----: '!.-:-::',17-:" !,-;'';','' :', - '..,r,",!°1:r-,--7";,-itS ,,. lb — tett- Kneit) Le w . _ . .. . . _. ... .__ . .,. .. _ ,... . .. _ ,..........-...„._, : _ ,.. , _ _ _ , . : , ....: , ,,,„ . , . ,., , . ,. . . ... ... . . ... .. . ... ,,,,.., . ,_,,,.....„ -i-c.--- .„...,,,-,....:1•,,,,. , . ,..„..,,,,?"„,....,..,,.....„.„.„.„,..,:„......,,...„...,,........„....„,,..„....„....„......._ ..,..„..„.....„..,,,,,,...„,....,,,,,,,,...„.._.„:„.„.......„:„,„...„...„,,,,,,,...?", , ..„.„„....„....,, ......„ ...,. ....„„. , .. .,, ,,,, ,,.. .. ..,. .,.. , . .. _ ... , ......, . _, . ..,....„,„,....„_ ....._,..„ ,,,,,,, ., .„. _ _, ,, , ., „ . ,4, :,, .,,,...:X,'!';',1',.;'4','-.;14f.lifAia,tit*,147at?!.$,':?;44.4t1I''.:fir*24411;,! :'•,*1,!:,..;77c,::!:,‘: .4,1i.5,.A:4-1t_:),.,-.,,..,,,,.,.:„..' '''''';:'''''''L4''''j.' ' •'''''''' '' , '.4k*.'' ' ' '.1*''''. 4°.' '''' '14""''''. • '''''.%' ' '.''''''''''' 41q*,,I.,,,,,,. - '',.;11'44::,,..?;.,A.?.''','''''7''''''-',-.''''''f.';1-''.-7,4-':'' ',•I'''''''''''''''''.''''' '''' H ,..,,-,- -,,,,,,,,,..,,,,,, -,.,":,,,,,,, ,,, -,...,-,,-„,,,-, - - ,,--,-;,s2r,4,.-T;,,,,-,-,,,,,,,,,--, - - • .--,-- ..-:,,,,-.,:.1-.4,%-i..-- -T-.,-.L,,-- :,.',.-- -',,, -: , ' ' ',, ......, . . .„...,.. , UniVerSitY q Hal,. , ,,ali at Hilo 9 - Walinart .. .: 4 ile3 47 - — ...-- / ,----Th t,2aoc.,„ 2cCF\9, Kaurratta CaveS 9 ,,,...t.„,...,..3 ,_ . Itu Go gie (2000,\, 1 , , 1Ippt1cnt RpiSt THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A STATE LAND USE DISC RICT BOUNDARY AMENDMENT TO DEVELOP 90-UNITS OF foFFORDABLE HOUSING WHICH AIMS TO PROVIDE AFF DRDABLE HOUSING AND RELATED SERVICES ON A PARCEL IN SOUTH HILO, WHICH WAS MADE AVAILABLE BY THE GOVERNOR' S EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 4531 . 1 • 0 ..„---- .' 7- -, , I ye-- - / , /f _ , ,,': ' \.":04.4)1.1',- ti P;'-'•.;: \\\\ f i ft fles1 C� ZC „.„ • ,... ,',•,, ..,... D ,. 1 , v„- \ , ,. ,. 1 1 1 I II 1 ..., 1 1 I i 1 ° „ '1 "4-- , „..... 1 • ! 4:1: , :\, -\,,,. - \ \ 1'':,'''-.,.',-, . :5, it-,,,•-L'- . . ‘,.)..:.1 --,{\<, \' -*.----''''Arv1P-#.-t',4:1-t.1::-f-_-: ':.. ... ,..,, 7,,,:-t-1-. 4,:,I-L .,,,,:f;•-.1-117.., \-. -•.<7 . ; \44fri,,,,,,,,„,„,.....,,L.-------,,i,.„- 4-. • ',,,, . - -\ - -, -, • : Iv- . ,„ , „,..--,. :.-...::-.Ji,.LS', 4.44. ..1.'„.,-,,,-!-..-,ftiv,, .'' '. : 0 '',:, / / '•("( ti,' -e:''.; ' ... / '..., .....,.iii3OP'.',,,:r-.,:tti'.....'.: , t-''N'..,' i -j 'VA' \ ' ' ' . :,,.•.:' L A '.- !-':'. --...:: '.-?..1-P-V.:i:' ,,.• . ''. '- ,' ..• , N," '-'f' / .I,„ .,,,, ' I',.' --',:'''::' {v-,.. '' -'', ',.--(:• ' '-':- n,,,i•.y.ftr,i'lIkt I'''''''i'' •<' t e- / I \ X f ' ....:—'. : N: . . , / / '-f>''', '''''' '1"" . ' ''':.'i--:-•'::,' ,X-, :=...), 1-,-7 r -'-''''',., ->d\ - . ;,,7--- \ \-'-,'; , ....-- ---)4, ',.',.... ,•:••,- ,;:-,,:- ;•:'-':' )..---'- -•-• , _ ',, -'• • -,•,'_. ,--------- - \ _ -''' '.:-. ''':', ;',--'-'••.-4. -:••:,•••';.:...-'..--,... 1,T:'• -"' ...,„ • • . , ........,- •,....„. ,-------- . ....-,-.,..,-,•,„ t• ' .,.' -....,. . . .. -... . -. .. 4...v,... . . . . ,:. ,„„ : . • „.. . , • ,, , . . -. • ,....-f;--c.--•„ .,,,,,:-.----:-. - , ,. . . , . . . , „:„ . , .........,,..„....."„ _,... ''.,/:• .___..., ---- U U • P. -----._.-----_---__-_-_- ,_ -'`..".....„. ..,..•. ., 4.1,41,, .. ,41110,44...'•Li_,:,::.k,,-,..'-'-;;;;.:.r.''-. . rti C ) ri eat) (11 tiiiilli4 ( ILU ce,,t-tc)siii IJAc ratttiliii ''Ifiz's x i �: ., .3 % cam', e-4-5,',.'T".'.. • '_ t ; ' ar -o, , , b � , s` t _ .. i .-.:4-. .,o--- 4-'4, AO ,, Q Qj< / --. " . -,-,- '' 7:11'":',',-.4410,,:;,,-.1,:,'''' -''''' G a s, r / h 4 4 . .E1.4.._ '.. v.': _ se, ,k,',-0--.7.; 1 t v ft .i Y44,' d- ,w y } a p v. e rr, ? tit II 4 p p ft,cf:itti.'" A sat r ,,..,,,,,,r,„ ,_ „.. ...... .. 3. -- , 1\ 1 t . t 1 1 \ 1 single story residential ' 1 , rte' AL. ,f c ` / l i 1 ' ,1 --:i' 1 1 �- 7 t l / community center 1 30'setback / / 1 r , . R.,7,,,,,,,,.,..„..„..„.„ , ,I/ / .”....: .... multi-story residential _ 14' Landscape b tte — x^;''-'474';'''''''i _ 't ;: 7-----'---i''''":"'1'.-i.. -- ms , .tea _ - �,. ,, #fete i` y «o-u ,.t ft dY' - '� � -ri f ax. ).l.is , _ 'k@'_ r - 40 1.1 ,-- '-- ' 2 ', '_,-,- '-,-, .1.“(I) 411P1)I 11(1444(144 -(141 'Pt)I14c 13 . • , • • , • • . • . S • �rk ._ s� ti t., . ,,,, ,, 4, A„... _ .. , 4iii . . ... , . ,. . t4,„ 1 ' '''''''';' * . --- o > i ,...., cP M ' Y° r- • 1 y� 4 •' �a J^ri f, t • Z • a, y s I . I • • • ' ,k-,_ .• • • # • • . , .-----.. - 4) • I 12 . ........ 1',,,,„- okir / • • • / • • .4",Jr-' - , '4•W':-' ' , • • - • , 4,.. -.. Alik ' • 4t ... ..- . a • ii e / ., ! ; r i ".' . ...o ,I. A. 1 icimivimi:zosio:ztlaimetevit)cii.,,;-/$1644:-.2I.: ,agiesmii •Iii; 1 , so, 1 i ., - imiliiikk ' Q p . t--,, •i . ...--- -. # • • . .. •* • • ' '"..- ' • . .. - •••-•.• -- , „. .. - ,, • • .. )0. • . , , • • • ., • • • ..:,1 ,1. ". ' , t,: 0 • • • ) .' • 0 0 • • _ . .. ., • k ...- . ...- :, • • • I/ . . 4 *' • 1 A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION Diefitt#911 FOR THE STATE LAND Ilaolsoilikhztatiolki, USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY COUNCIL .