HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0608.003 2020-2022 Comm.0
GIBER �F�Q arr'rnereP
t 0, �
Japanese Chamber of Commerce
m & Industry o�f Hawai`z
�r
� rRY of YAP 'ince 190
1951-2027
February 17, 2022
Honorable Maile David
Chairwoman and Presiding Officer ---4
Hawai'i County Council ` ---*
CIO CD
25 Aupuni St. -#
Hilo, HI 96720
a3
Honorable Susan"Sue"Keohokapu-Lee Loy
Chair, Public Works and Mass Transit Cormnittee co
Hawai'i County Council
25 Aupuni St.
Hilo, HI 96720
RE: Bill 120IReference Communication 608.1
An Ordinance amending Chapter 24,Article 8, and Chapter 25,Article I and Article 4,
Division 5, of the Hawaii County Code 1983 (2016 Edition, as amended), relating to
providing, maintaining, and dedicating parking spaces and charging stations for
electric vehicles
Dear Council Chair David and Committee Chair Keohokapu-Lee Loy:
The 300 members of the Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Hawaii (JCCIH)
respectfully submit this letter in reference to Bill 120, concerning the providing and maintenance of
parking spaces and charging stations for electric vehicles in the County of Hawai`i.
The JCCIH has consistently supported legislation and policies in favor of energy-efficient and
sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels that seek to preserve our environment and improve our way of life.
We support Bill 120 subject to necessary legal amendments by the Hawaii County Council that will
ensure congruency with existing State law, and not deny our Big Island businesses the equal
protection of laws.
Unfortunately,the statement that"The purpose of this ordinance (Bill 120) is to enforce the
requirements of sections 291-71 and 291-72, Hawaii Revised Statutes(sic)" is inaccurate. If the
Council adopts this legislation and enacts this ordinance as submitted, Big Island businesses will be
denied the equal protection of laws since disproportionately more financially expensive burdens will be
imposed upon them vis-a-vis Oahu based businesses.
714 Ktmoelehua.4vewee, Hilo, Hazoai'i 96720-4565
Plzone:(808)934-0177 •:'Fax:(808 934-0178 •:'Email tr�F:�la.r�r�r
trim. Pa _
Ref. To vVTd
Ref. Date FEB 2 2022
Honorable Maile David
Honorable Susan"Sue"Keohokapu-Lee Loy
February 17, 2022
Page 2
Section 291-71, Hawaii Revised Statutes, as amended("HRS"), was originally enacted into law
by the Hawai'i State Legislature in 2009. This state law provides that places of accommodation"with at
least one hundred parking spaces available for use by the general public shall have at least one parking
space equipped with an electric vehicle charging system located anywhere in the parking structure or
lot."
This carefully crafted statewide legislation ensured the promotion of sustainability, while taking
into account the differences in economies of scale that existed between Oahu businesses and their
neighbor island counterparts. Further, HRS Section 291-73 provides that"Each county may adopt
ordinances to enforce the requirements of section 291-7, including the establishment of penalties for
failure to comply with the requirements of that section or maintain electric vehicle charging systems in
working order" (emphasis supplied).
Unfortunately, Bill 120 goes much further than set forth the enforcement mechanism for HRS
291-71, but instead imposes different requirements in the proposed creation of Section 25-4-54.1,
Hawai'i County Code 1983 (2016 Edition, as amended) ("HCC"). The proposed language of this
portion of Bill 120 seeks to require places of accommodation in the County of Hawaii to dedicate and
install electric vehicle chargers "for each increment of fifty parking stalls."
Bill 120 injures our local businesses in the following ways:
1. Bill 120 is repugnant to the requirements of HRS Section 291-7. The State Legislature has pre-
empted the counties with respect to the specific numerical requirements of electric vehicle
charging stations and stalls, as these requirements were carefully crafted based upon the
appropriate economies of scale, since Oahu businesses are larger and better able to absorb the
cost of this govermnent-imposed requirement. By now"upping the ante" for Big Island
businesses with no corollary ability to economically fimd these mandates, Big Island businesses
are denied the equal protection of laws by our Hawaii County Council (assuming the Council
adopts Bill 120 as submitted).
2. Bill 120 should be limited to enforcing the existing requirements of SIRS section 291-7 only, as
that is what the Legislature has specifically(and only) authorized the counties to do.
The JCCIH will continue to support legislation and policies that promote energy-efficient and
sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels. We are members of our business community, and members of
our beautiful island community as well. HRS Section 201-71 already establishes a fair statewide
balance in encouraging businesses to do their part in the sustainability effort for our state and counties.
There is no need to harm our consumers by creating arbitrary requirements that exceed the mandate of
state law,which will necessary result in consumers having to pay more for the products and services
they enjoy on our Big Island.
29.5016.3v1
r
I
I
I
s
Honorable Maile David
Honorable Susan"Sue"Keohokapu-Lee Loy
February 17, 2022
Page 3
Based on the foregoing,the JCCIH respectfully request that if the Council does entertain passage
of Bill 120, that proper legally necessary amendments be made by deleting the proposed HCC Section
24-4-54.1 This proposed section is repugnant to our state law, exceeds the Council's authority by
essentially creating discriminatory burdens on local Big Island businesses, and needlessly exposes our
County to liability for a constitutional deprivation of equal protection of our laws.
Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
t
Lincoln S. T. Ashida
President
i
it
i
ii
2950163v1