Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0269.013 2022-2024 P /Gourd comI4.%9 From: Antu Harvey Sent: Monday, May 01, 2023 4:10 PM wn To: Council Testimony Subject: Testimony- RES 163-23 - Oppose "AUTHORIZES THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF LANCAsfER NAMIE TOWN PURSUANT TO HRS 46-7, TO FORM THE PACIFIC HYDROGEN ALLIANME Mahalo for this opportunity to testify. I Oppose Resolution 163-23 (Hydrogen Alliance) , This rushed proposed resolution, which will only have one hearing, authorizes the Mayor to formally execute an agreement with terms undisclosed with cities in California and Japan. The purpose is to"work together to implement hydrogen project deployment to advance towards a hydrogen society." Last November, the US Department of Energy announced that the "H2 Trans Pacific Team' (Cities of Lancaster, CA, Nannie, Fukushima, and County of Hawaii (as Mentee)) was granted one of their two 2022 'H2Twin Cities Initiative' awards. Earlier in 2022, there must have been some sort of understanding worked out by County Department of Research & Development with the two cities as to what our County commitment could entail. This Resolution does not provide that information. My deep concern is that even within the intervening five months, our Council has not been provided any additional information about this alliance, or the staff resources we need to contribute, or the projects we are likely to undertake to fulfill our role as 'mentee' - AND now, this Resolution is being rushed through as 'Urgent', "that a breach be authorized to submit this Resolution after the ... deadline" and to "waive it from the Finance Committee in order to place it on the Council agenda". It is not public knowledge why this Resolution was not processed in a more timely and compliant manner - with good information presented to the Finance Committee so they could make an informed and thoughtful decision. This rush job after five plus months seems to gives us the perception of unskilllful management or more of the "trust us mentality" rubber stamping through pro forma approvals. _If you have not received information so you can confidently answer the following questions, please oppose passing this Resolution at this time and have it handled through the well-ordered process other Resolutions follow. • Even if Hawai'i County may receive $100,000 from US DOE for our role in the 'H2 Twin Cities Initiative', what County controls will ensure no existing staff resources will be diverted or distracted from current more pressing needs? • Does this Alliance agreement place us in competition with, or exclude us from participating in the State level efforts on the "Hawai'i Pacific Hydrogen Hub"? • Do you feel confident that this won't become yet another "shiny penny/ silver bullet" short term commercial exploitation of our lands, energy, and water? Please vote on this matter bearing your integrity and wisdom and confidence that the outcomes will be pono. Comm. NA,. 1191- 1 VIIMAI 1 Ref. To: Ref. Date MAY - 3 2023 r Mahalo nui for your dedicated service. Antu Harvey Holualoa - 96725 2