Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0649.000 1998-2000 RECEIVED 7-~~ ~,,,w 2:38 m~ g lorra'~451~,1 ilq~e.. ~ kyaouro County Council r January 18, 2000 zooozz Mr. Robert Yanabu Chief Engineer Department of Public Works County of Hawaii 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Mr. Yanabu: Subject: Hilo Wastewater Treatment Facility Operation and Maintenance Inspection Attached for your use is our annual Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Inspection Report for the subject facility. Department of Health staff inspected the subject wastewater facility on August 19, 1999. The facility is given an "Unacceptable" rating based on the deficiencies cited in the report. Please respond within thirty (30) days after receipt of this letter with an affirmative action plan addressing the deficiencies noted. A'reasonable time schedule for the correction of the deficiencies should also be included. Should you have any questions, please call Sina Steffany of our Wastewater Branch at our direct toll free no. 974-4000 extension 64294. S~ce"rely~ THOMAS E. ARIZUMI, P.E. Chief, Environmental Management Division SLS:jc Attachment c: EPA, Region IX (Attn: Mr. Tom Huettman) ~COUnty Council Public Works Chairperson DOH, Clean Water Branch / Comm. No. 10 File No. 'S~w Ref. To: Pwl c/ Ref. Date FFR 0 ? ~~9 OPERATION AND 1[AINTENANCH INSPECTION AEPOAT INTRODIICTION Faailitys Hilo Wastewater Treatment Plant Date(s) of inspection: August 19, 1999 inspector(s): S. Steffany, DOH Wastewater Branch Facility Aeprssentative(s)/Job Title: Lyle Hirota, WWTP Superintendent Andy L. Narido Sr., WWTP Supervisor (TA) BACKGROUND i. Current status of deficiencies cited in previous inspection reports: Deficiency: Infiltration/Inflow (I/I) continued to impact plant operations during the past year as noted by the low influent BODE/TES. As such, the facility was having difficulties in meeting its 85 percent removal permit requirement for BODE. However, with the completion of the Bayfront Sewer Line Rehabilitation Project, the i/I problem should lessen. Status: Grout sleeve equipment vas purchased and the County is in the process of purchasing chemical grouting equipment to reduce I/I. Aeducinq I/I vill be a on- going project. Deficiency: The influent sampler tube bracket had completely corroded away detaching the tube from the wall. This condition subjects the tube to downstream displacement caused by turbulence from the Pua Pump Station influent. A sidestream return line located downstream of the sample point may contaminate the influent sample. The influent sample tube must be resecured. Status: The influent sample tube vas resecured. Deficiency: The refrigerated influent sampler at the headworks was unlocked. NPDES samples must be kept locked to prevent possible tampering by unauthorized personnel. Status: The influent sampler unit has been locked. Deficiency: Influent screen no. 2 was inoperable awaiting repairs. Status: Repairs to the barscreen ware completed. 2 Deficiency: The design problem relating to water intrusion of the foul air piping at the headworks is still outstanding. Foul air is not being removed and treated as originally designed. Status: The eacloaures at the barscreens xer• removed to eliminate aoafined spans hasard• rhea performing maintenanoe on the equipment. xo iaareas• in odor problems resulted. The air piping was blanked off to prevent rater intrusion. xo lurther cation is proposed. Deficiency: Primary clarifier no. 1 has been inoperable 61nce 1995 due to a continually malfunctioning variable frequency drive (VFD). Efforts to repair the unit have been unsuccessful. The co-settling mode of operation requires two of the 3 clarifiers to be on-line at all times. Therefore, no backup is available should another clarifier unit break down. statues The Aastexater Division is evaluatiaq the removal of the vFD and replacing it xith a gear reduction spstem. The target completion dat• is 12/30/1999. Broxn i Caldxell is evaluatiaq this problem and th• target date may be changed. Deficiency: The diffusers for the preaeration basin required replacing due to plugging problems; Status: The diffusers rill bs replaced. The target completion dat• 10/30/1999. Deficiency: Biotower pump nos. 2 and 4 were inoperable awaiting repairs; Status: The County has attempted repairs and has a unit at a local machine shop. One pump rill be replaced and the other pump rill be svaluated for repair or replacement. Broxa i Caldxell rill be evaluatiaq this problem. The target completion dat• is 12/03/2000. Deficiency: The bent skimmer arm, noted in last year's inspection report, for final clarifier no. 1 was removed. Floating sludge clumps were passing through with the final effluent. status: Bids for the repair project is currently being solicited by the County. No target completion date has been scheduled for this project. 3 Deficiency: Final clarifier no. 3 was inoperable due to the pending repair of sludge pump no. 1. Although only 2 clarifiers are needed at any time, this situation provided no available backup unit. Status: The system Mss modified and the szistinq pump Mss rsplaasd with a submersible pump. No further action is required. Deficiency: The effluent flowmeter was last calibrated in October 1997. The County's NPDES permit requires semiannual calibration or as required by manufacturer's recommendation, whichever is less. The 1995 inspection report reminded the County that calibration was required every 6 months. The 6 month preventive maintenance sheet should be updated to include this requirement. status: The floMmeter is aurrentlp on a f month calibration schedule. Deficiency: The packing for the digester sludge mixing pump no. 1 was leaking; Status: The pump Mas modified and a nechanlcal seal has been installed. Deficiency: The waste gas burner does not relight automatically when the flame goes out. Statues The system was designed Mith a continuous LPf; flame to provide sutomatia re-ignition. Ths system will bs re- designed by a consultant to provide automatic rs- ignition Mithout a continuous flame. The target aomplstioa date is 6/30/2000. Deficiency: Thickened sludge pump no. 2 stator was worn out; Status: The stator has boon replaced. Deficiency: Centrifuge no. 1 was inoperable. The bowl needed to be shipped to the manufacturer for extended repair work. No backup unit was available. Status: The County contacted the nanufactursr regarding the repair of the unit. Humbolt-Decanter informed them that the loss of tiies Mould result in an aaaslsrated deterioration of the scrsM conveyor, but that repair of the screM could be accomplished at the time Mhen sfficieacy of the unit viii be affected. Ths County has decided to perform the the replacement Mhen the efficiency of the unit is affsatad. 4 Deficiency: The electrical conduits in the primary MCC room still have not been painted as noted in previous inspections. Status: The conduits xere not yet painted. The target aompletlon date is scheduled for 9/30/1999. Deficiency: The odor control prechlorination system continues to be inoperable as noted in previous inspections. Parts have been removed for use elsewhere in the plant. Status: The system is not bsinq utilised beaaus• of its high operating costs and the odor problems not being severs. Se-evaluation o! the system rill be aacompiished in the event that odor problems ar• encountered in the future. Deficiency: As noted in previous inspections, the automatic flow proportioned chlorinator remains inoperable and the unit continues to be operated manually on constant feed. This results in possible over or underfeeding of the amount of chlorine needed to fully disinfect the effluent caused by fluctuation in plant flows. Status: The automatic flox proportioned spates had not been installed on the dap of the inspection. In a subsequent letter dated October 11, 1999, the County stated that the system has been installed and is operational. Deficiency: Bacterial sampling results for the effluent are suspect due to the lack of adequate detention time in the chlorine contact tank. The sampling station is located only about 15-feet downstream from the chlorine feed line. Status: The County rill perform a dye test to oonfirm detention times lroa the effluent facility to the old Hilo 8TP facility. Bacterial and chlorine sampling rill be performed to ensue MPDES permit requirements are being met. Deficiency: Staff vacancies have impacted preventive and corrective maintenance work at the Hilo WWTP. Current vacant positions include: a sewer maintenance supervisor, an assistant operator, and a maintenance technician. In addition, the WWTP supervisor has been on leave for the past year due to a workman's compensation case. Status: The Sexer Maintenance Supervisor's position has been permanently filled. The County intends to fill the vacant mechanic and assistant operator positions. A final resolution of the WWTP Supervisor position is currently being pursued. 5 Deficiency: Safety - The stairway to the second floor of the centrifuge room was missing the middle rail. For safety and liability reasons, a rail should be installed. status: J?n additional rail Mas installed. Deficiency: Safety - The non-potable water warning sign for the hose station atop the biotower was broken and should be replaced. Status: The xarning sign vas replaced. Deficiency: Security - The main security gate at the access roadway leading to the plant is not equipped with electrical power. The gate remains open when the plant is manned. This is a design deficiency that has not been addressed by the County. Status: During work hours the gate remains open and unauthorised entry is being aonitored by staff on duty. The gate is locked during nos-xorkiaq hours. Deficiency: The sewer user charge appears inadequate to cover annual operation and maintenance costs of the facility. The 1996/1997 fiscal year (FY96/97) annual report indicated a shortage in the sewer fund and a portion of the fund was subsidized by the County's General Fund. The Hilo WWTP was partially constructed with state and federal construction grant funds. Federal regulations 40CFRS35.2208 requires grantees to implement an adequate user charge system and sewer use ordinance throughout the useful life of the treatment works. The Hilo WWTP has deteriorated during its 5 years of operation. status: The Wastexater Division rill be proposing revisions to the Haxaii County Cod• to increase the user rates. Target completion date is scheduled for 6/30/00. Deficiency: The equipment replacement fund for FY97/98 showed a balance of $2,052,775 on June 30, 1998. Considering the equipment problems noted in the inspection report, a zero ($0) disbursement during the fiscal year is questioned. Status: The Wastexater Diviaioa xill be increasing the number of repairs sad replacement of equipment. The County xi11 be hiring a sex civil engineer that rill be responsible for designing and/or contracting the necessary equipment upgrades or replacement. 6 2. NPDEB Permit 8tatuss Permit Expiration Date: NPDES Permit HI 0021377 expires at midnight on August 31, 2000. Comments: None. 3. Enforcement Actioa: Status: None. 4. Capacity Aaalysiss Average flow: 3.4 million gallons per day (MGD) for the period 8/98 to 7/99 Design Flow: 5.0 MGD; Percent of design capacity: 68 percent Previous year's comparison: Last year's reported flow averaged 3.76 MGD. This year's average flow decreased by approximately 0.36 MGD or 9.3 percent. The recently completed Bayfront Sewer Line Rehabilitation Project and the dry weather encountered during the past year may have contributed to the reduction in influent flows. 5. Influent/Effluoat Data Analysis: Based on aont~ly averages for 08/98 to 07/99. a. Influent BOD, 74.9 mg/1 (composite) b. Effluent BOD, 11.5 mg/1 (composite) c. Influent TSS 99.8 mg/1 (composite) d. Effluent TSS 12.4 mq/1 (composite) e. pH (min) 7.0 (grab) f. pH (max) 7.2 (grab) Permit limits are 30 mg/L and 30 mg/L for BODS and TSS, respectively. 6. Modifications/Additions - Planned/Present Construction Status: None. CURRENT INSPECTION 1. Maintenance: Check either: No. of: Preventive Maintenance: Current Backlogged Corrective Maintenance: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Major (or all) items requiring repair/replacement: a. Primary Clarifier No. 1. - Malfunctioning VFD. b. Grit Screw - Rebuild screw and replace housing. 7 c. Aeration Tank Diffusers - Needs replacement. d. Centrifuge No. 1 - Tiles are falling off. e. Biotower Pump Nos. 2 and 4. f. Final Clarifier No. 1 - No skimmer arm. 2. Aeuse: The facility has a DOH approved effluent irrigation plan: _ Yes _ No ~j_ Not applicable. 3. NPDSB or Chapter 62 violations (effluent limitations, spills, etc.): The 85 percent BOD5 removal rate was not met for the following months: October and December 1998; March, April, and May 1999. The chlorine residual limits were exceeded during the months of February, and May 1999. 4. visual quality of effluent on date of inspection (inapector~s judgment): The final effluent appeared clear on the day of the inspection. S. pacility~s Present Deficienoiess a. infiltration/Inflow (I/I) continued to impact plant operations during the past year as noted by the low influent BODS/TSS. As such, the facility is still having difficulties in meeting its 85 percent removal permit requirement for BODS; b. Primary clarifier no. 1 has been inoperable since 1995 due to a continually malfunctioning variable frequency drive (VFD). Efforts to repair the unit have been unsuccessful. The co-settling mode of operation requires two of the 3 clarifiers to be on-line at all times. Therefore, no backup is available should another clarifier unit break down; c. The diffusers for the preaeration basin required replacing due to plugging problems; d. Biotower pump nos. 2 and 4 were inoperable awaiting repairs; e. The bent skimmer arm for final clarifier no. 1 still requires replacement. f. The waste gas burner was not being used because it does not re- light automatically when the flame goes out; 8 q. The tiles for Centrifuge No. 1 still requires replacement. The bowl needs to be shipped to the manufacturer for extended repair work; h. The electrical conduits in the primary MCC room still have not bean painted as noted in previous inspections; i. During the inspection, boiler #1 had malfunctioned and was placed out of service; j. Bacterial sampling results for the effluent are suspect due to the lack of adequate detention time in the chlorine contact tank. The sampling station is located only about 15-feet downstream from the chlorine feed line; k. The automatic flow proportioned chlorinator remained inoperable on the day of the inspection. A County letter dated October il, 1999, stated that the system has been installed and is operational. 1. Staff vacancies continue to impact preventive and corrective maintenance work at the Hilo WF1TP. Current vacant positions include: an assistant operator, and a mechanic. Zn addition, the WWTP supervisor has been on leave for the past two years due to a workman's compensation case; m. The sewer user charge still appears to be inadequate to cover annual operation and maintenance costs of the facility. Federal regulations 40CFR$35.2208 requires grantees to implement an adequate user charge system and sewer use ordinance throughout the useful life of the treatment works; n. The equipment replacement fund for FY98/99 showed a balance of $1,909,172 on June 30, 1999. Considering all of the equipment problems noted above, a $150,000 disbursement during the fiscal year is questioned; and o. A discrepancy concerning the process control data for the biofilter influent was noted. The total suspended solids of the influent was less than the effluent. Therefore, a negative removal rate resulted. After discussing this matter with staff personnel, it was determined that the sampling location of the influent was not representative of the wastewater entering the biofilter. Apparently, the sampling point did not include the sidestream that was recycled back into the biofilter causing a lower influent concentration to be sampled. 9 BIIMMARY 1. cianaral Rating: ACCEPTABLE CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE UNACCEPTABLE Explanation: The rating is based on the numerous deficiencies that are noted above. Many of the deficiencies were cited in previous inspection reports. Efforts should be taken by the County to resolve these deficiencies in a more timely manner. l0