HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0675.052 2022-2024 •
Sent: Monday,January 22, 2024 11:55 AM
To: Darla Hartvigsen
Cc: Council Testimony
Subject: RE:WRITTEN TESTIMONY -TAR BILL 121
y .-K.
•
035
N
From: Darla Hartvigsen
Sent: Monday,January 22, 2024 11:53 AM
Subject:WRITTEN TESTIMONY-TAR BILL 121
To whom it may concern:
I am "OPPOSED"to the erosion of private property rights. Homeowners should maintain the right to use their home for
residential purposes regardless of length of tenancy or number of occupants.The County should not dictate to private
property owners which parts of their own home they may occupy, or rent, or how many visitors they may allow.
Furthermore, requiring homeowners to disclose which rooms they are living in or renting out is not only an undue
intrusion into property rights but is also unenforceable.The proposal of a public-facing list and license signage
requirements identifying all transient accommodations poses an unacceptable security risk, particularly when coupled
with public-facing calendars(e.g. on Airbnb,VRBO, Booking.com, etc.). OPPOSED to county regulation that directly
conflicts with state law.The proposed legislation contradicts Hawaii Revised Statutes. Many uses of residential property
are permitted. Eliminating existing unhosted transient rentals of 31 days or greater without allowing nonconforming use
permits for homeowners is prohibited by State Law. Increasing the minimum duration for short-term rentals from 30 to
180 days poses legal complexities and could result in unnecessary litigation.This change unfairly strips many
homeowners of their current usage rights, impacting the value and utility of their properties.This is especially relevant
considering a recent Oahu ruling(Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance v.City and County of Honolulu),where a judge
maintained the 30-day minimum and highlighted the legal and equitable issues of extending the minimum period.
I am "OPPOSED"to further endangering housing security. Bill 121 will disproportionately hurt those on the lower socio-
economic spectrum. No evidence has been presented by the County to demonstrate that property currently used for
transient accommodation will convert to long-term or affordable housing.The inherent risks (Landlord-Tenant code and
emergency proclamations) in providing residential housing combined with lower rental rates deter many owners from
offering their rentals in the long-term market. Residents who specialize in servicing such properties, offering maid
service, handyman assistance, and landscaping, especially in rural areas, will be affected. If these individuals have fewer
SLComm. No 7 •
Ref. To: / I M1D
Ref. Dote JAN 2 3 20�2
opportunities for work,they may be compelled to either leave the island or commute long distances for lower-paying
employment.These unintended consequences further hinder residents' ability to secure housing. Bill 121's exemptions,
by focusing on specific professional groups such as nurses and doctors, even as outlined in state legislation,
inadvertently create a discriminatory framework.This selective approach not only overlooks the broader spectrum of
housing needs across various occupational sectors but also fails to address the overarching housing shortage issue on
the island.
I am "OPPOSED"to punishing local homeowners with unreasonable fines,fees, and processes.The onerous application
process, and initial, and renewal fees outlined in this bill, create an undue financial burden on lower income residents.
Fines up to$10,000 in addition to Director imposed fines at twice the highest advertised daily rate are exorbitant and
disproportional to the violations proposed in the bill.These issues are in direct conflict with existing fines stated in the
Hawaii County Chapter 25 which start at$500 on first offense.Additionally, if a host receives three complaints within 12
months, the TAR/NUC may be suspended for up to two years.This concentration of power, combined with the
nontransparent complaint and appeal process for operators is unreasonable.The proposed bill's reporting requirements
are overly demanding, requiring monthly detailed submissions not just from large hosting platforms but also from
individual owners and small-scale operators, including'mom and pop'setups managing direct bookings.This
overreaching demand for comprehensive rental information is impractical and places an unreasonable workload on
these services. OPPOSED to additional regulations instead of full enforcement of Ordinance 2018-114. Ordinance 2018-
114(Bill 108) and the resulting Planning Department Rule 23 have had little to no impact on deterring illegal vacation
rentals or curbing non-compliant behavior.The lack of proactive enforcement measures by the county failed to
adequately address the underlying issues that Ordinance 2018-114 sought to solve.The County must actively pursue and
terminate illegal transient rental operations as well as equally enforce existing regulations to protect all residents.
This responsibility extends beyond a complaint-driven enforcement model which only contributes to the erosion of
community character. Until Ordinance 2018-114 is proven effective in preserving the character of our residential and
agricultural areas, reducing speculative investment in properties within these markets, and adding to housing availability
for residents,further regulatory changes should NOT be considered
Darfa.fartvigsen
� >r�r^+u
F ,1i Y
\ 1 Sti�., P'r.
E 4,y ' , k"} , Branch Broker, Equity Hawaii Real Estate
n �
RB-22680
': ")'t12 r :yie‘ IgflCRS, GRI, C2EX, GREEN, AHWD
`ti 1,,,,.}Y", 1 2024 Program Committee Chair&2023 President
Y*; `,•`' z 0.4 .V't�`:' 808-319-9913 1210 Kamehameha Ave.Hilo,HI 9672o
t' e'' u4' *"�y; •darla@equityhawaii.com
pli
d; •bigisland.equityrealestateusa.com
Qquity
•Join Our Team!
Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied, and used only by the intended
recipient. If you received it in error,please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephone, delete the
e-mail, and do not disclose its contents to anyone. Mahalo.
2