Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0675.068 2022-2024 From: JOSHUA DREWS Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024 8:27 AM To: Council Testimony Subject: Comments Re: proposed Bill 121 Aloha, We are writing to register our concern and objection to the annual fees proposed in Bill 121. We have owned and operated a small un-hosted vacation rental with the apropriate permits and tax ID numbers for several years. The combination of GET, TAT, & HCTAT already combine to make one of the highest tax burdens paid by owners and short-term guests in the entire country. There is little, if any, on-going work required of the county to maintain existing registrations so there is no justification for charging substantial annual renewals. If the County Council feels it is absolutely imperative to collect even more money from properly registered and compliant transient accommodation rentals it would be much fairer to do so by slightly raising the HCTAT. The proposed "one-size-fits-all" annual renewal is, in essence, a regressive tax where the financial burden will fall heavier on the operators of smaller more affordable units than it does on larger more expensive properties. We strive to provide a safe, clean, and affordable rental. Please support us in providing affordable accommodations by not imposing annual renewal fees. There are better, fairer ways to generate revenue. Sincerely, , Joshua Drews & Cara Sloman - r.� ---: -i1c:, • Comm. N . S. Ref. To: G 1 Ref. Date 2 3 2