Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0671.009 1998-2000 raPR-a3-209 12:Sa PM KFiT HPYN'S OF kONr=i B08 3~6 76=~T P.V31 P.O. Box 9040, Kailua-Kona, HI 98745 April 3,2000 'Or; F,FC ~ P~ 1 °9 Post-It'"brand fax transmittal memo 7871 umn•p•¦ ~ _Z Mr. Aaron Chung, Chair r i ~ Aa~o ~ .•m~~? ` ~"'s` Finance Committee, ~ ~ Hawai'iCountyCouncil, °ipt 37 25 Aupuni Street, re'" r}-y/L, a .?16 7G..f' Hilo, Hi 96720 Dear Mr. Chung, Subject: BII121O and 12esolutlon 216-00 Please clroulate a SPY of this to all committee members and make this a numbered COmmunicatlon. I am writing to offer testimony in opposition to the subject legislative proposals submitted by the mayor and In support of the timely extension of Lako Street to Alii Drive. The arrrount of $3,000,000 was approved and appropriated for the Lako Extension project as part of the $30,000,000 bond float (Ord. 99-21). I understand that the mayor's proposal may compromise federal funding for the Kahalui- Keauhou Parkway end that the cost of his proposal will be substantially higher than Indicated. The idea is good for another access road but not at this time. The geographical location of Lako Street would benefit the greatest number of people in the event of an emergency and immediately reduce the traffic on existing feeder streets. The mayor's proposal would not provide the same degree of benefits. Time is of the essence. It is my understanding that the Lako extension can proceed upon completion of an Environmental Impact statement on a single parcel of properly. The Lako extension would tie in with the imminent mauka connection planned by the private sector that will provide another access to Mamalahoa Highway and reduce traffic on Hualalai Road. The proposed option would not. In conclusion, there are many compelling reasons to start the Lako Street extension immediately and to avoid opening up a financial can of worms with the mayor's proposal. The county's resources are limited and the need is now. Also, doesn't it make sense to Connect existing roads before we construct new roads? And. how can we consider new projects when we are unable to complete what has been agreed? For all the above reasons I ask you and the committee to reject subject proposals and support construction of the Lako Street extension. Thank you for your favorable consideration of my request. Cornm. No. 67 ~ ' Q y, File No. ~ M.l.. Ref. 'ro: FG htef. hate APR 0 3 2000 iaP2-0T-2000 12:51 PM KG+TMRYN'P. OF k~~~Nt=+ 808 3i6 Y6eT P. Oc April 3, 2000 • Page 2 Sincerely, ~O FITZGIBBONS