HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0709.001 1998-2000 is
j i t
Stephen K. Yamashiro \ rgE.CFi\ Richard Wurdeman
Mayor I�� t.l Corporation Counsel
rr `�+na'•� " UA! 2g PPS 11 57
Taunt of Xu aii rcE, - j i ;JAW
OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION COUNSEL
101 Aupuni Street, Suite 325 Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4262 • (808) 961-8251 • Fax (808) 961-8622
•
June 15, 2000 c .
O L rr •
C C
OPINION NO. 2000-01[
— N
k r
t -
Honorable Nancy Pisicchio
Councilmember, Hawaii County Council g —
25 Aupuni Street y N i , ;
Hilo, Hawaii 96720 c
SUBJECT: Sign Variance for Konawaena High School
Dear Ms. Pisicchio:
This is a response to your request for an opinion on the legality of a proposed sign to the located
on private property along Mamalahoa Highway between Kealakekua and Captain Cook in South
Kona.. The purpose of this sign would be to advertise various events, to be held at Konawaena
High School. As the school is off the highway, such a sign on school property would not be
adequate for that purpose.
That segment of Mamalahoa Highway is maintained by the County, but is a Federal Aid
Highway (FAP 11).
It is a condition of Federal Highway Aid that the states initiate "effective control" over signs
visible from Federal Aid Highways. Effective control, is defined as limiting signs to directional
and official signs, signs pertaining to natural wonders and historic sites, signs advertising the sale
or lease of the property on which they are located, signs advertising activities conducted on the
property on which they are located, signs in existence before 1965, and certain informational
signs to serve the traveling public. 23 USC §131(c). States which do not establish such controls
are subject to having their highway aid reduced. 23 USC 131(b).
Hawaii, to comply with this mandate, enacted what is now HRS §264 -71 -79 in 1966. This law
prohibited the erection or maintenance of any outdoor advertising visible from a federal aid
highway, again with exceptions similar to those noted above. HRS §264 -72. Such signs are
deemed to be public nuisances HRS §264 -76, and criminal penalties were provided. HRS §264-
77. Another law, Act 233 of 1965, now HRS §445-111-121, regulates outdoor advertising
generally without regard to visibility from federal aid highways. By virtue of the Act, a wide
variety of signs are prohibited, including signs advertising meetings when not displayed on the
Comm. No. • 00
File No., A
Ref. To: PW ➢C
ReCnite JJN 1 5 2000
Honorable Nancy Pisicchio
June 15, 2000
Page 2
premises where the meeting is to be held. Although that Act delegates to the Counties to further
regulate and control signs and billboards, that authority does not extend to signs that are
prohibited. HRS §445 -113. Civil and criminal penalties are provided for violators. HRS §445-
121, 121.*
The legislative power of the County to enact ordinances ends where it conflicts with a statute that
is intended to be uniform in application throughout the State, HRS §46.1.5 (13), Citizens Utilities
Co. v. County of Kauai 72 Haw 389 (1991). The billboard law previously discussed only
delegates to the counties the limited authority to regulate signs that are otherwise legal, not to use
a variance procedure to legalize prohibited signs.
While I recognize the valid public purpose of this proposal, it is clearly prohibited by both the
highway advertising laws. I reluctantly, therefore, conclude that the proposal that has been
presented to you can not legally be accomplished.
Sincerely,
d er
RICHARD D. WURDEMAN
Corporation Counsel
RDW:B3
PISICCHIO - Konawaena Hi Sch Sign
*The constitutionally of this Statute has been questioned in light of the decision in Metromedia Inc. v. City
of San Diego, 453 US 490 (1981). See Caldwell, K. Metromedia Inc. v. City o/' San Diego: The conflict
between Aesthetic Zoning and Commercial Speech Protection; Hawaii's Billboard Law under fire, 5 Univ.
of Hawaii Law Review 79 (1983). The law remains in effect, however, and for purposes of this discussion,
it will be presumed constitutional.
C — G — fJP:' x
f ,� l \
-d. r r o•
Nancy Pisicchio'c'!o'•. Tel: (808) 961 -8266
Council Member .,r Fax: (808) 961 -8912:
..�.r. r ,
COUNTY COUNCIL
Coun FILE COPY
County of Rowan ✓'
Hawaii CauiryBuilding .
25 Aupuni Street
Hilo, Hawn 'i 96720
June 15, 2000 `•
Mr. Richard Wurdeman, Esq.
Corporation Counsel
Office of the Corporation Counsel
Hilo Lagoon Centre
101 Aupuni Street, Suite 325
Hilo, Hawai'i 96720
Dear Mr. Wurdeman:
Enclosed is a copy of a request from Mr. Daniel Yoshida, Principal of Konawaena High School, for
two variances from the County Code regarding signs. See the attached description of the sign and
variances sought.
I would appreciate it if you could provide me with an opinion in writing regarding the following: 7 ;
Under State law, does the County have the legal authority to approve a request
for a variance to permit this sign to be installed off site, not on State property?
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
•
Sincerely,
ti '`' i ;..
Nancy Pisicchio
NP:sd
Enclosure
77 -6399 Nalani St., Suite 104 Kailua -Kona, Hawaii 96740 Kona Telephone: (808) 326 -5684 Kona Fax: (808) 326 -5697 • •