Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0236.005 2024-2026 P/PcPO bill 147 bomi4.9.56. From: Kristina Anderson Sent: Sunday, May 4, 2025 11:46 AM To: Council Testimony Subject: Bill 47 OPPOSED , ca May 4, 2025 I -< La c,-� Honorable Councilmembers, Thank you for taking my testimony. I am adamantly opposed to Bill 47. Well, I cannot believe we are back here again. Less than 6 months after you all decided your original TAR bill was so bloated, so unpopular, so complicated and so ridiculous, you now come forward with Bill 47, which you claim with pats on your backs is nothing more than a "simple registration." After spending/wasting two years of time and taxpayer resources for literally nothing, you trot this thing out like it's some kind of welcome grand idea and answer to everyone's prayers. Do you think we were born yesterday? While at first glance, the new bill appears to be "simple registration." But indeed, a closer inspection reveals this is actually a malevolent trojan horse loaded with more land mines than anything else you ever heretofore proposed. It's also still replete with some of the things "Community" hated the most. One example: Enormous, targeted punitive fines. And apparently the mandate that unpaid fines for not registering will lead to having your property liened and sold as though you didn't pay your property taxes! What? A minor civil violation should not lead to a tax lien. Is that legal? You are losing your home not because of taxes but because of simple non-compliance where you didn't even get the chance to cure the violation? Draconian! Or this: I don't understand why a host and an owner are " jointly and severally liable" for the fines and violations. What if it's a tenant who lives on site and is just responsible for a few managerial duties? I think this could be unconstitutional. How can someone not involved in the ownership of a property be responsible for fines! It's absurd. What if they are a renter, and they don't own a piece of real property in which to affix a lien on? This was in the previous legislation too. I hated it then too. These are just two examples that I find troubling in this so-called simple registration bill. There's much more but I am already wearing of enumerating them in a letter of t-sti ony again. Comm. Ao e Ref. To: :1 0 1141 V4 i 1 Ref. !Me MAY - 6 2025 I am not in this business anymore and no longer have no skin in the game. (You have succeeded in getting at least one kupuna to quit!) But what infuriates me no end is the way you councilmembers seem to think there is some ginormous money being made by families., kupuna hosts or single moms renting out a spare room or ohana. I have to honestly ask again. Don't you have anything better to work on? Something that helps the community instead of making life harder? And speaking of life being harder for Hawaii Island residents, tourism to the United States and travel in general has dropped off a cliff, in case you haven't noticed. We are headed for a major, self-inflicted recession imposed by the Trump administration, which as longtime residents of this island know, will hit us doubly or triply hard and will make Covid supply chain shortages and hyper inflation look like the good old days. Coming soon! Yet you spend your time on this nonsense! Again. After the community and at least one planning commission rejected it outright. After endless parades of people gave their time to testify multiple times about what they hated about 121. After you went down rabbit hole after rabbit hole with this bad idea for two solid years. Especially Heather. Why not be proactive and help the community prepare for the upcoming economic catastrophe instead of limiting our ways to make income and participate in the state's largest industry? We do understand that you, with your high county council salaries of $86k annually plus benefits are safe, and don't have to worry about tariffs or economic conditions like the rest of us low-income peasants. So maybe that's why you are comfortable introducing more legislation to hurt residents. Really shameful that you cannot use your well-paid positions to actually help constituents for a change. Sincerely, Kristina Anderson 2