HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0236.110 2024-2026P /cauncil
,P,if( q7
CCMK.IM
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aloha Council Members,
I oppose bill 47.
Judy Weeks
Monday, May 19, 2025 12:36 PM
Council Testimony
Bill 47
Since my position is aligned with HIRPA's, I'll use their recent words to describe why I am against Bill 47.
"We want to take a moment to clarify our advocacy stance on Bill 47, in light of recent discussions, the imminent results of the economic impact study, and some
public misunderstandings. HIRPA's goal is not to obstruct regulation or spread misinformation, but to ensure that any legislation passed by the County
is grounded in facts, is fairly implemented, and protects the residents it affects most.
What We're Advocating For —and Why
Bill 47 is described as a "registration -only" hill, but as written, it includes vague but powerful enforcement mechanisms, significant fines, and opens the door
for future regulations tied to zoning and land use that could be easily used against good -faith registrants. While we believe the County Council has good
intentions, we advocate for revisions to clarify the county's assertion and protect the community.
We are advocating for three specific, responsible measures:
i. Delay final action on Bill 47 until the County's economic impact study is released.
The Council itself ordered this study to better understand the short- and mid-term rental
industry. It should inform any policy —not follow it. We believe this delay will ensure smarter
regulation, aligned with actual data and measurable outcomes - or even show that regulation
will not result in meaningful, positive change, and is unncessary.
2. Protect registrants through clear, written amnesty provisions.
Many residents operate in good faith but may have unpermitted structures, legacy additions, or
zoning that doesn't currently align with their legal use. These folks are not criminals —they're
community members trying to make ends meet. We're asking the Council to create protections
for those who voluntarily register and self -disclose, so that this doesn't turn into a "gotcha"
enforcement mechanism down the road.
3. Build policy based on trust, not fear.
After the experience of Bill 121, where late -stage amendments caused a surge in fear and
confusion, it's understandable that many in our community remain skeptical. We're not
encouraging mistrust —we're responding to it. Our goal is to make sure that Bill 47 includes the
necessary protections so that people can participate in good faith, and the county can start to
restore public trust.
We Support Regulation —But It Must Be Done Right
HIRPA supports thoughtful, transparent, and enforceable regulation. We are not trying to eliminate oversight or exempt STR operators from responsibility. But
regulation must be based on evidence, reflect economic realities, and offer a clear path for residents to comply without fear of retroactive penalties."
Thank you for your time,
Waikoloa Village resident and considering doing a hosted stvr
ComV.m. �®
RedVU. To:
Ref. 2025