Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0313.013 2024-2026June 16, 2025 Policy Committee on Planning, Land'Use, and Economic Development Hawaii County Building 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, HI 96720 P/f�cp 16410 COUNTY CLERK C 50 COUNTY OF HAWAII 2075 JUN 16 AN It: ► Re: Opposition to proposed Bill 060 an ordinance amending Chapter 25, Article 1, Article 2, Article 4, Article 5,.f and Article 7of the Hawai'i County Code 1983 (2016 edition, as amended), relating to zoning district regulations for meeting facilities, churches, temples, synagogues, and community buildings. I am writing in opposition to the proposed Bill 060 that would prohibit churches from gathering before 8:00 a.m. and after 9:00 p.m. I have been a resident of Hilo since 1974 and have been an active member of three different Christian churches. I also have many family and friends who are active members of other faiths in this community so I am well aware of the type of services and activities that are available through these churches. Therefore, I believe 1 can speak on behalf of myself, my church, and many other churches that may be impacted by these proposed changes. On October 6, 2017, a memo was issued by the Attorney General of the U.S. Department of Justice entitled "Federal Protections for Religious Liberty" (Federal Register 82FR49668). It states: 1. The freedom of religion is a fundamental right of paramount importance, expressly protected by federal law. 2. The free exercise of religion includes the right to act or abstain from action in accordance with one's religious beliefs. Federal statutes, including the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 ("RFRA") support that protection, broadly defining the exercise of religion to encompass all aspects of observance and practice whether or not central to, or required by, a particular religious faith. 3. The freedom of religion extends to persons and organizations. The Free Exercise Clause protects not just persons, but persons collectively exercising their religion through churches or other religious denominations, religious organizations, schools, private associations, and even businesses. My primary opposition to the passage of Bill 060 is that it infringes on my First Amendment rights and my church's under the Free Exercise Clause that ensures that individuals or churches can practice their religion freely without government interferences. Secondarily, churches of all denominations and religions not only meet the spiritual needs of our communities but are vital partners to address the socio-economic, youth/elderly, substance abuse, recreational and other needs of the community. I have been apart of and have witnessed many churches involved in feeding the hungry and outreach to the homeless, providing voluntary care for the elderly, etc. Many of these activities require the use of church facilities to prepare for such activities and would be curtailed if the hours of facility use is restricted by the passage of this bill. As more government services and resources are being cut because of limited funding, it is more critical to turn to the churches and faith -based organizations to serve the community. For these reasons, I respectfully request that you VOTE IN OPPOSITION to Hawaii County Bill 060. Sincerely, Sara Narimatsu ` Hilo, Hawaii f' Comm. • Ref. To• Ref. Date 7 20