HomeMy WebLinkAboutJensen, Josh
Tsuneda, Kaci
From:Josh Jensen <jjensen1389@gmail.com>
Sent:Sunday, November 1, 2026 4:51 PM
To:Council Testimony
Subject:Written Testimony — Bill 147 (Draft 3) — Josh Jensen — Support with Amendments
To: Hawai ʻ i County Council
From: Josh Jensen, Kailua-Kona Resident and Homeowner
Re: Bill 147, Draft 3 — Hosted Transient Vacation Rentals and Related Property Tax
Protections
Position: Support with Requested Amendments
Aloha Chair Inaba and Members of the Hawai ʻ i County Council,
My name is Josh Jensen. My wife, Melissa, and I are raising our three children in Kailua-Kona,
where we own and occupy our home. I am writing in support of establishing a reasonable
legal pathway for hosted vacation rentals, while requesting greater consideration, flexibility,
and financial protections for local families who live in Hawai ʻ i County and depend on rental
income.
For approximately 15 years, our family has been actively involved in serving the Kona
community through local churches, ministries, and numerous community initiatives,
particularly those supporting vulnerable children and families. We are also foster parents
and have welcomed 12 Hawai ʻ i County foster children into our home, providing them with
a safe and loving family environment. Kona is our home, and we hope to continue raising our
children, fostering, and serving this community for many years.
For approximately nine years, we have welcomed visitors through short-term rentals, hosting
more than 1,000 stays. Our property is our family's primary residence. We live on-site,
maintain the property, manage our guests, and remain accountable to our neighbors.
Rental income is an important part of our family's financial stability. Much of our ministry and
community work has depended on charitable support rather than traditional salaries. With
the high costs of housing, property taxes, insurance, and utilities, along with substantial
medical expenses related to one of our children, hosting helps make it possible for us to
remain in Kona.
I strongly believe local resident families who host guests in their own homes should
receive greater freedom and consideration than absentee property owners who operate
vacation rentals while living outside Hawai ʻ i County.
1
A family renting bedrooms in its primary residence should not be placed in the same
regulatory or property-tax category as an investor who owns multiple multimillion-dollar
vacation properties but does not live in our community. These are fundamentally different
circumstances, with different impacts on housing availability, neighborhoods, and local
families.
I recognize the County's responsibility to protect residential neighborhoods and preserve
housing. However, regulations should also recognize that hosted rentals can help local
families remain in their homes rather than displace them.
I respectfully request the following provisions and considerations:
1. Greater flexibility for local resident hosts. Establish a distinct category for qualifying
owner-occupied hosted rentals, with greater flexibility and fewer unnecessary restrictions
than unhosted or absentee-owned vacation rentals. Residency and genuine owner
occupancy should be meaningful considerations in determining how these properties are
regulated.
2. Multiple rentable bedrooms and flexible listings. Clearly permit qualifying homeowners
to rent multiple bedrooms or suites to separate guests simultaneously, and to advertise
those rooms individually or together, without each reservation or listing automatically being
classified as a separate TVR. Occupancy and safety standards should govern actual use
rather than the number of online advertisements.
3. Existing dwellings and ʻ ohana units. Provide clear standards for how existing legally
permitted guesthouses, ʻ ohana units, and separate living areas may qualify for hosted
accommodations on owner-occupied properties, including clarification of the one-TVR-per-
building-site restriction.
4. Special property-tax provisions for local homeowners. Establish property-tax
classifications or relief provisions that distinguish qualifying full-time Hawai ʻ i County
residents renting portions of their primary homes from nonresident investors operating
vacation properties. Local families should not automatically face the same tax treatment as
owners of high-value investment properties.
5. Property-tax amnesty for existing resident hosts. Provide a reasonable amnesty or
voluntary compliance program for qualifying local homeowners who have previously hosted
guests while maintaining homeowner property-tax classifications. This should include
consideration of relief from retroactive assessments, penalties, and interest, allowing
families to become compliant without facing financially devastating liabilities. I ask the
Council to consider these protections alongside the related tax-amnesty legislation.
6. Income-based tiers and protections. Consider a tiered framework that accounts for
household income, rental revenue, owner occupancy, and property value. Lower- and
2
moderate-income resident hosts should be distinguished from high-revenue commercial
operators and owners of multimillion-dollar investment properties. Other jurisdictions use
differentiated classifications and income-based relief programs, and I encourage Hawai ʻ i
County to consider approaches appropriate to our local community.
7. Reasonable registration and transition requirements. Provide clear registration
instructions, affordable fees, reasonable compliance periods, and appropriate consideration
for established lawful operators. Registration should reflect actual accommodations rather
than imposing duplicative requirements simply because the same bedrooms are advertised
in different combinations.
I support reasonable building, fire, wastewater, parking, occupancy, and neighborhood
protections. My request is not to eliminate accountability, but to establish a fairer system
that recognizes the substantial differences between local families sharing their homes and
commercial vacation rental investments.
For our family, this legislation is about much more than a rental business. It affects our
ability to afford our home, raise our children in Kona, continue welcoming foster children,
meet significant family medical needs, and contribute to our community through churches,
ministries, and local service initiatives.
I respectfully ask the Council to give greater consideration to families like ours who live,
work, serve, and raise children in Hawai ʻ i County. Please ensure that Bill 147 and related
property-tax legislation distinguish genuine resident-hosted accommodations from
absentee-owned vacation rentals, provide meaningful protections for lower-income
homeowners, and create a practical pathway for existing hosts to comply.
Hawai ʻ i County should be a place where local families can afford to remain in their homes,
not one where resident homeowners are regulated and taxed as though they were wealthy
absentee investors.
Mahalo for your time, service, and consideration.
Respectfully,
Josh Jensen
Kailua-Kona, Hawai ʻ i
3