Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0020.029 2000-2002 r~ - ~ -i ~ TESTI\10\1" OFDa\ ID I;I\h-~ FRS\h.L 'C ~ C~_ iti N~ 3 Po soli Ilse 'I Chatr Letthead-Todd and members of the Plamm~o Comm;itre RE ~PPOI\T\IE\T OF CHRISTOPHER 1'L'E\ a~ PL,\\i\G DI I am pleased to support the appouttment of C h~ is l sir i ac Pla iri s H a•.t ai ~ Counh Earlier thts.ear the Democratic Parq of Hat~at ~ ~,lopted t to a'~ r~n calling for stgntftcant reform of the Planning Department and Planrn g c ri th~• pa_t see eral .ears the Planning Department and Commis~ior h.« r repe.~i a~~ and authorized the destruction of natural resource; There ur fe~~ pe ~~1~ i I~r'tei suited to bringing about the kind of change needeJ m the Pl, nnin~ D~•p i~ ~ ~ i 1 u~_n \Ir Yuen has a solid groundmo ~n land use late He i~ lamilia~ ~ ' c=rr= of the island .and hts sen tce on the Boatd of Land 8. \atri-l 'tr~~~uice s I' ~~~ie e~petience He has e~actl~ the ktnd of e~penence and Lnrn led~~e th,rt Planning Director (see attached resolution) Comm. No. A 0 •a bale No. Ref. To: Preseafeu ~ (7G Ref. Date 1 9 2000 CALLI\G FORREFOR\[OFTHECOC\T1 OFHa\\ I P~},~~T1~ ~S ~ i'I 3 ~'~~tS DEP_aRT\fE\T ~\'HERE~S the~udtctan has repeatedl} found that the Hatt a FlarttxiaL l' ` tit ll•e Planning Commission hay e ~ wlated legal requaement ar; ~CHERE_aS the Supreme Court found that the Plamm~a Cnmrni>sion nr~~i~ members of the public standing to challenge a resort deg ei~~pment at ti~~l i ~ es~ ~horehne Ha~tai r ~ Haaat r Counn• Plannmy Commrm~7 tnd ~CHERE.aS the Supreme Court found that the Plannm~_ C ~annn~su•r air r tmpmperh authonzed construction of a cellular phone tots e- m t:~e a _n~ ai tl-e shoreline Curtts ~ Board of .appeals Count} of Hattart .end ~~-HER;;aS the Supreme Court found that the Planntni L`epuvnent un:. d to exempt a resort project from preparing an em tronmental a-~essnent ~_r „ e_n,,n of the \orth Iiohala Coastline ~ Counn,~f Ha~~ai i and \CHERE_~S a state ctrcurt court found that the Planning C,~inmrssmi tai • ~~er procedures m ~ranhng a permtt for the deg elopment at a 'ahz F P~ cc _ \ssoctauon t Ha~~ar'r Plannm~ Commission and «'IIEREaS a state ctrcurt court found that the Plannini C ~~nrmsstor in-. a permtt for a cellular to.. er dominating o~ er \Iaulua Gulch oen r E o,u ' Ord \\-HERE~S the State Land L'se Commission decision In ie t ~odfie~ r~ - , ~ ~ irn planning department teas not properl} protecun~ the rnte~t of ac r uli \O~~"THEREFOR BE IT RESOL\"ED TH.aT the Demerzuc Farts rr~ ,ider to reduce litigation costs and protect Ha«au•s unique natural ie~ource~ hr ,~f t to Hat~au Counn Plannms Department and the Commnston is 'ir~enth r~ !adopted b} t he Hatt au Counn Democratic Pam \I: ~ '_~'~ro i Re ~ .