The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES 025 Draft 01 2000-2002 COUNTY OF HAWAI`„-e~s.~ STATE OF HAWAII RESOLUTION NO. 25 01 A RESOLUTION COMMITTING TO FUNDING THE COST ITEMS AWARDED TO THE HAWAII FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION BY ARBITRATION, AFFECTING FIRE FIGHTERS IN BARGAINING UNIT 11 FOR THE CONTRACT PERIOD JULY 1, 1999 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2003. WHEREAS, Section 89-11(d) of the Hawaii Revised Statutes relating to collective bargaining requires that in the case of a "final and binding" decision by an arbitration panel, "[a]II items requiring any moneys for implementation shall be subject to appropriations by the appropriate legislative bodies", and WHEREAS, this section further requires that the employer " shall submit all such items within ten days after the date on which the agreement is entered into is provided herein, to the appropriate legislative bodies", and WHEREAS, an arbitration decision has been rendered by the arbitration panel to resolve an impasse between the employers and the Hawaii Fire Fighters Association on behalf of Bargaining Unit 11, and WHEREAS, the cost items included in the settlement are shown on the attached exhibit, and WHEREAS, the estimated cost to the County of Hawaii for the period July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2003 due to the provisions of the new contract, as shown in the exhibit attached to this resolution, wdl be paid in FY2002 and FY2003 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII that the funds necessary to pay the obligations under this agreement will be included in the operating budget in FY2002 and FY2003 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the Department of Civil Service and the Department of Finance. DATED: Hilo, Hawaii, this day of Fehr„ar:, , 2001. INT DUCED COUNCIL MEMBER, COU OF HAWAI'1 COUNTY COUNCIL ROLL CALL VOTE County of Hawaii Hilo, Hawaii AYES NOES ABS EX ARAKAKI I hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION was by the CHUNG vote indicated to the right htreof adopted by the COUNCIL of ELARIONOFF 7{ the County of Hawaii on Februarv 22. 2001 IACOSSOx LEITHEAD-TODD ATTEST: PISICCHIO X SAFARIK TYLER YAGONG Reference C-68/FC-16 COUNTY CLERK CHAIRMAN & PRESIDING OFFICER RESOLUTION NO. ~ Counh' of Hawaii Bargaintug Unit 11 Settlement Costs July 1, 1999 (FY00) through June 30, 2003 (FY03) Annual Affect on Poll oct ac .Pat. Elect on pa}roll Base pay at 630 99 S 11,071,034 $ 11,071,034 FY00 & FY01 - tvo Increase - - Base pay at 6r30`O1 $ 11,071,034 $ 11.071,034 Fl'02 Longettty III increase from 10% to 12'/° 39,012 39,012 across-the-board (ATB) increase on July 2, 2001 555,502 SSS,i02 Catchup longetth• payments on July 2, 2001 275,475 - Longettty movements from July 2, 2001 to June 30, 2002 43,553 63,668 Step H movements for 25-}'r employees on Jan 1, 2002 30,575 61,150 Total payroll cost m F}'02 $ 12,015,156 Base pay at 630 02 S 11,790,366 Base pa}' at 630 02 3 11,790,366 5 1 1.790 366 FY03 5°oacross-the-board (ATB) increase on July 1, 2002 589518 589,518 Longettty movements from July I, 2002 to June 30, 2003 17,16' 17,167 Total payroll cost m Fy03 S 12,397,051 Base pay at 63003 $ 12,397,051 Less base pay at 63099 $ (I 1,071.034) Increase to base pay due [o [tits settlement S 1,326.01' FY02 FY03 Total (2001-021 (2002-031 EY_Q9=Q; Deternnnnnon oJtoad increase ur cost doe to proposed connar t Total payroll cost for each fiscal tear as per above calculations $ 12.015.156 S 12 397,051 Less base pay at beginning of each fiscal year (I 1,071,034) (I 1.790,366) Total addmonal cost 944,122 606,685 $ ) 550,807 Add affect of poor year increase m base pay 719,332 ~ 19,3 32 Total increased cos[ sublet[ [o fringe benefits 944,122 1 326,01' 2 270,139 Cenatn fringe bene£t costs (30 50%)* 28',9?' 404,439 692,392 Other Cost I[ems Increase m meal allowance effective 72 `01 17, 722 1 % 722 35,444 Increase m one dav-travel meal allowance effective 7'201 140 140 280 Prov tde 2 add'I sets of uniforms to 40-hr~ wk employees eff T2~01 840 - R40 Increase m proficiency pay for MICT's and E~•(T's** 73,000 110 000 183 000 Increased costs to be paid 1.313,781 1,858.314 3,182,095 Employers contnbunon to ERS (20 13°0 of total increased cost subject to fnnge benefits)*** 190,052 266,92' 456,979 Vacation srek leave and holidays (21°'0 of total increased cost sublet[ to tnnge benefits) 198,266 278,464 476,'•30 Total increased costs $ 1,712,099 S 2,403,705 5 4,115.804 •Fnnge benefits included are overtone, premmm pay, temporary asstgnmen[, compensatory time, meals, workers' compensation, and unemployment compensation ""Proficiency pay is reimbursable from the State under the E~1S contract •'•Actuanally determined contribution rate for classes B and D per ERS annual acmanal valuation dated 630.99 However, the amount of the Coun[v's contribution for fiscal year 2002 is already established and will not change because of [his payroll increase Fumre years' contnbunons will be affected